₦airaland Forum

Botking:
But wait first, waiting that fellow do you wai you dey attack am, like this, abi u want cash Cruise, because this your own account is open today for all this, I no come understand

KiNg0G:
i rather believe in man than an Abstract figure.

men fail yes!, but God doesn't fail because they is nothing like a God anyway.

it's an illusion, a character portrait by men.

he ain't there, he is not in The sky bro, that's part of the script in the storylines.

just give me one reason!

Premiumwriter:
Stop giving yourself false credit.

I didn't read it because what you wrote is utter trash. I only try to be respectful in my previous post not because you spoke any truth.

Premiumwriter:
Do you think other religions offering human/animal sacrifice do so without reasons?

Premiumwriter:
You keep saying reason, so what reason justifies the sacrifice of Jesus? Is that reason reasonable enough?

SSIPON:
I never said a flood never happened, I said a WHOLE EARTH FLOOD...

SSIPON:
Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.

SSIPON:
Please read;

Again, don't misquote me.

The middle east is prone to floods.


Read the title of this post, I said "WHOLE-EARTH" flood.


Nna,it seems reading is such is a difficult thing for you.

I even created a post describing the topology of the middle East and why the story exists in the first place. The Noah's Flood story is not even a Christian/Muslim/Judaism tale in the first place. It was based of off a Sumerian tale.


You and MaxInDHouse have the same problem and let me list it here for you:

1. You don't read properly. This is why having a decent conversation with you is hard, because you just like to quote, even if you don't understand.

2. You are so obsessed with your Bible that you don't realise that it doesn't work that way. It's just like a Muslim trying to convince you that Islam is true, by pulling out his Qur'an, putting your verses to your face and expecting you to believe or something.

I was once Christian like you. I did all these things you are doing now. You think I was born agnostic or something?




Please if you are going to misquote me, then do it intelligently. This is embarrassing and you know it.

Also for the last time, I don't know who is Workch, so keep me out of whatever you and him are beefing about. I'm not in a good mood today. I'm not joking.

Have a nice day.

Workch:
Same way you can’t see evidence for theory of Evolution

SSIPON:
it is extremely likely that a huge flood could have occurred. However, the next question is: "Did the Noachian Flood cover the whole earth?"[/color]

Una thinking eh!

"extremely likely a Huge Flood could have occurred with the question "Did the Noachian Flood cover the whole earth?

Does this make any good sense?

The huge flood referred to, The topic of this thread, is it not the same one covering the whole earth?

Abi, e cover space?

[quote author=SSIPON post=106831488]Scientific Evidence Against a Whole-Earth Flood

Because this flood was intended by God to destroy all flesh on earth (Genesis 6:13) and because sedimentary rocks on all continents contain fossils that supposedly represent the "destroyed flesh of all life," it might be thought that the Bible story, describing a wholeearth flood, was true. However, interlayered with these fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks on all continents are layers of evaporite rock salt (sodium chloride), gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate), anhydrite (calcium sulfate), and various potash and magnesium salts, which are associated with red beds (shales) containing fossilized mud cracks (Schreiber and others 2007).

Workch:
[s][/s] no evidence for that

Danniedpastor:
I was expecting you to mention the things mentioned in the tract.

Danniedpastor:
Anyways, God Hates sin not the sinners. Be careful how you handle them. So that your teaching (of condemnation) won't drive them away farther from God.

BluntTheApostle:
God is liable in many ways.

First, He created humans that had no knowledge of Good and Evil. How can you create something so naive with a wise serpent lurking around, and you expect the naive human to survive temptation.

SSIPON:
Okay Dtruthspeaker

stockwise:
Sir, what exactly is your question or what are you debating? I haven't noticed anything from you that is debatable. Or am I missing something?
Hope you know the topic of thread

SSIPON:
On this website, if you notice that a religious person is about to start and argument with you, just quote one of this replies saying, "Okay [moniker], have a great day ahead". It's such a subtle but great way of signalling the guy on the other end that you don't even have their time.

Example:
"Okay, MaxInTheHouse, Have a great day ahead!"
"Okay, Dtruthspeaker, I hope your day is as fruitful as mine".

However, an argument has already begun and really isn't going anywhere (the religious person is just going around in circles). Just quote him, saying "Okay [moniker]". This will give the person on the other end a false sense of "accomplishment", because he'd think He's won the argument. Whereas, you are the one that doesn't want the conversation to go any further because you are certain nothing will come out of it and it will just be a waste of time and data.

You get

BluntTheApostle:
...Who took responsibility for the MTN outage that many Nigerians suffered recently? Was it not MTN that did?

BluntTheApostle:
If Kalashnikov makes a rifle that is known to misfire regularly, would he not be blamed?

BluntTheApostle:
..But God created Satan and man, and should be responsible for the evil they commit.

Danniedpastor:
Please sir, define "evil".

Most of the time you just stand and condemn people in the name of"preaching" the gospel.

What some people do is to preach "damnation" over "reconcilation".

Judgement day will be funny o

MrBrownJay1:
none of the above laws are a requisite to enter an invisible after life world ruled by an invisible god....

MrBrownJay1:
of course, and if/when i follow the laws of this job, i will get a concrete salary, with concrete benefits etc...i certainly wouldnt get a pipe dream that NOBODY CAN CONFIRM! why should enter a convenant that has NEVER been proven? a job i get an outcome from following its laws, same as any other laws outcome. your religious laws outcome are the only ones that are made out of thin air and that can NEVER be verified nor proven!

MrBrownJay1:
i am sorry, all the above laws you are talking about are to enter an imaginary heaven ruled by an imaginary god....shouldnt we therefore FIRST check the validity of all this imaginary stuff?!?!?

LordReed:
I now know what's going on with 2 of you. You live together. You are either siblings or husband and wife.

Premiumwriter:
I tried reading this but it's so painful to read I had to abandon it.

Like I said, first thing first let's call a spade a spade. If the death of Jesus was for the atonement of our sins, then it's a sacrifice involving a human life.

The reason for such a sacrifice is secondary.

Boomboost:
...A new year comes and goes and others follow, still the situation doesn't change yet people still believe God is interested in making Christians rich.

truespeak:
No one gives cars, houses, work, e.t.c to the dying, rather we seek cure for his ailment first!

It is only after they are cured, that all these can be added unto them!

This is what Christ meant when He said " Seek ye first ..."

But do these so called Pastors tell them so? No, they take advantage of them!

They are no different from Fraudsters who take advantage of the sick and dying to fleece them of their earnings!

Wickedness!

dazzlingd:
Lol, arguing against you.

, she was even too nice, arguing a religious robotic brain can be so exhausting, imagine playing chess with a duck that keep shitting on the board.

In your deep delusions, u think u are at the pinnacle of making sense

Premiumwriter:
...Take for instance, when you as a Christian see idol worshippers carrying sacrifices to the shrine, you don't stop to think that they may be carrying a sacrifice to the gods because they are happy that the gods they served has blessed them or they just want to do it as an appeal to the gods for wealth.

Premiumwriter:
...And if the God of Christianity have a reason to demand for blood with no one castigating him, then maybe Christians shouldn't castigate others obeying their own gods.

SisterFire:
...I wanted to reply u earlier but I was so scared my humanly 11,500/14,350 will reduce to 500/890, it happens anytime I argue with u , jesusjnr2020 or sister anas09 my IQ reduces so much that I will want to shout " Jesus come and rape me with ur holydick"
Arguing with u its same as ezike pig owner dragging mashes in the faeces gutter with a full grown pig , and when the pig wins its master ...it will say with pride " I serve the great god of strength and wisdom " .while shame and distaste shall be d purtion of its master who joined d pig to fight over shits .
Me and dazzlingd wishes rapture to u holy ones " I can give my life for raptures to come" SMh

Myer:
The bible simply says you can call one a fool if he says there is no God.

Myer:
You mean calling me mad and a fool was respectful?
I wonder if you passed English at all or you're simply a religious bigot.

Myer:
Note that it is religious bigots that angrily defend their god to the extent of insulting anyone who challenges them and even resorting to murder.
You're just a step away... you'll soon get there.

BluntTheApostle:
But who created Lucifer and men?

Myer:
Are you a Christian?
If yes, you're a shame to Christ and Christianity.
Instead of addressing the issues, you resorted to insults which is obviously the defense mechanism of the ignorant and angry.

If not, by all means you're allowed to have an opinion. It's a free world.

Premiumwriter:
...Human Sacrifice from my perspective is any ritual that involves the shedding of human blood to either obtain favor from a deity, appease an angry deity, or a form of Thanksgiving for the good done by the deity.

The reason for the sacrifice does not matter much in this our argument but what is most important is the process and the 'item' of sacrifice.

Ayo081: