₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Case settled!

Correct!

So Russell is the founder.

So JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES ORGANIZATION is operating according to the rules set by Russell shey?

You're still asking!

Do you believe Jesus returned in 1914?

Do you believe Faithful and discreet slaves are the one Jesus is using to feed His organisation toady?
Do you use Watchtower Magazine?

Ọmọ all you need is honesty that's all.

History of Russell or which one?

If your father buys a building, renovated it, set rules on how to maintain it and gave his children to inherit it the former owner has automatically become your father shey?

Very dull.

Where is the correlation here?

MaxInDHouse:
OK so now you agree that he's not even worth being called a JW today.

Yes! Based on JWs new light of teachings not me

Which will also make him not to be part of that heavenly ruling

So what makes you feel he's the FOUNDER o!

1. because He established it and spent His own money.

2. He is the one who proposed 1914

3. He came with the slogan of "Faithful and discreet slaves"

4. He was the person Jesus would've have met when searching the whole Earth

5. He started WTBS

Even though Elon Musk has bought Twitter and became the owner, everyone knows Jark is the FOUNDER OF Twitter and nobody will ever address Elon Musk as the FOUNDER OF TWITTER

MaxInDHouse:
Emusan no sabi anything he just dey happy sey hin dey follow JWs tok!

Always miss yarn

So Charles Taze Russell FOUNDED a publishing company and after his death an organization took charge of that company therefore Charles Taze Russell is the FOUNDER of that organization.

Hilarious indeed!

Last last you agree that Russell actually founded something and organisation TOOK OVER WHAT HE FOUNDED.

CASE CLOSE!

@advoactejare can you see it?

So Russell was not a JWs in a nutshell

Janosky:
Emusan LIAR, did you open those verses?Nah 8 old men write Acts 15:6-15,Acts11:26 & Isaiah 43:10,21 in your own Bible?
Ozuo pro max glued to DECEIT.

Yes I did and I didn't see where JEHOVAH WITNESS was written.

So can you show us where it was written there?

Janosky:
Screenshot PROVEN evidence
Please read slowly until it enters your brain.
The founder of Zion's Watch Tower Charles Taze Russell made the ...
christianity.stackexchange.com › questions

Yes, it's obvious Russell did NOT believe Jesus was the Almighty God for he believed Jehovah had created Jesus as an archangel"

Emusan LIAR exposed for DECEIT

Oma se oooo

My point was, Russell Worshipped Jesus.

So how does this prove my point wrong?

So you haven't retrieved your brain from your Hall?

Janosky:
The disciples SAID they are Jehovah's witnesses, the people bearing Jehovah's name,Acts 15:6-15 SAID the biblical prophets agreed.

The Christians of Acts 11:26 confessed they are JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES.
It's as simple as that.

Why can't you quote all these verses so that we can see where JEHOVAH WITNESS appear even from your own translation?


Deluded JWs JaNosense the worshiper of the lying 8 old men in Warwick

Janosky:
Emusan LIAR exposed by the Google screenshot.

Which of my points are you addressing JaNosense?

Janosky:
Your comprehension skills leaves much to be desired.

Says the very ignorant one who almost everyone on this section knows he has NO BRAIN

Janosky:
Isaiah 43:10,21 Jehovah God FORMED HIS CHOSEN SERVANTS,JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES FOR (HIM)SELF."

And this has to be Russell who later became idolater by worshiping Jesus.

Mr Russell founded the legal entity named "Watchtower Bible and Tract Society" to fulfill the law of Ceasar.

MUMU TRINITARIAN

So ONLY THE LEGAL ENTITY Russell founded now

So is Russell a JWs?

The deluded one has come again and after being humiliated he'll ran back into his shrink hole

Janosky:
[b]Isaiah 43:10,21 Jehovah God SAID "YOU are my WITNESSES,MY CHOSEN SERVANTS... the PEOPLE I FORMED FOR MYSELF"

And Russell didn't discover this till he died despite Jesus was using him

Emusan LIAR , Advocatejare & Courz LYING on Nairaland forum SAID Russell wrote Isaiah 43:10, 21 (ASV) in his own Bible.

IBERIBEISM & Ozuo pro max.

Your position and that of your organisation is contradicting your beloved Britannica

When you're well post something meaningful

MaxInDHouse:
At least you've quoted what the organization said on that so i'm less concerned now!

Of course as the organisation says "WE VIEW"

MaxInDHouse:
My promise on this thread!

But Russell is still the founder of JW

If you like deny it till you die, that truth won't change.

MaxInDHouse:
If you're not a LIAR just quote it and stop this nonsense!

You're the liar on this forum.

This has been proven times without number on this forum.

So just tell me first what you say about this.

pandoragirigory:
You mean the female graduated as a male, how possible is that, because the university herself confirmed and released pictures of him, they confirmed he was their bonafide student, he might have lost his certificate and instead of going through the rigors of asking for replacement, he did another one but if you believe he was a female but graduated as a male, that means you must be part of those that have submitted their brains to Kanu nnamdi, that believed killing your fellow igbos will give them biafra

Can you provide the link to this?

The truth is many of you just defending this man but will go mad with teachers or the school if your children ever having such issue in school.

MaxInDHouse:
So who is the LIAR now?

Ọmọ i don't have the time for your stupidity today jọọ!

Everyone knows you're a liar!

Just tell me what you say about that first.

I have receipt

MaxInDHouse:
Can you quote where i typed and post the highlighted?

You can prove me wrong by quoting what you said about that before.

MaxInDHouse:
© The ORGANIZATION PRACTICING WHAT JESUS COMMANDED said:

"We view him (Jesus) as our FOUNDER"

So it's because they are PRACTICING WHAT HE COMMANDED that's what quantify them to say he is the founder of CHRISTIANITY which they are in fact doing the WORK.

© Of course Jesus' group must be ORGANIZED that's what makes them his true disciples WORKING with the same line of thought! John 17:22

© Surely since what they are PRACTICING isn't the ideas of any human the one whose ideas they're using should rightly be VIEWED as the FOUNDER of their group!

You can't chase rat with this!

That's just a point for another day.

The main point is that you lied that Satan founded Christianity and followers of Jesus aren't supposed to be called Christian.

How long will you continue to lie against Jesus for defending your gods in Warwick?

MaxInDHouse:
Please according to what you quoted who are the TRUE CHRISTIANS?

It was not stated there.

You can point it out.

The organization says Jesus is the founder of our group CHRISTIANITY.

You're still lying on what is written in black and white.

The organisation says "Jesus is the FOUNDER OF CHRISTIANITY" and went further to say we "VIEW HIM as the founder of our ORGANISATION".

So two things are involved here CHRISTIANITY and ORGANISATION.

And take note of that @underlined word "WE VIEW" which means Jesus didn't command any of your leader to found anything but your leaders JUST VIEW HIM as their founder just as many people lay claim to Jesus for their churches.

Very interesting!

But since Satan has planted weeds like you guys using the same tag {Matthew 13:25} JEHOVAH began calling His own worshipers by another group name: JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES! Isaiah 65:15

See the clown....so Satan only planted weeds now and not that Satan founded Christianity.

Remember your claim was that Jesus followers are not to be CALLED CHRISTIAN as that name came from SATAN.

Anyways, I'm not surprised at your lies.

That's how Jesus called out his own disciples out of the confusion you people found yourselves today. Revelations 18:4

The fact is that Jesus founded Christianity!

Why do you lie that it was Satan?

Over 41,000 different religions with contradicting teachings and conflicting doctrines all claiming CHRISTIANS. Luke 11:23

GOD forbids such madness!

It's none of your business.

Jesus founded Christianity! That's the fact.

So allow Him to control what He founded and not you dictating your delusion.

MaxInDHouse:
OLÓDO!

Mention with reference from the Bible the religion that Jesus Christ came to establish on earth and where he called it “CHRISTIANS“

But your organisation says Jesus founded Christianity

See receipt below

Always lying for your gods in Warwick.

advocatejare:
MaxInDHouse let me make it simpler for you. You lied that Jesus was the founder of JW religion, just substantiate your claim, simple as ABC

The @underlined is a cover up which is a lie.

Everyone knows that Russell is the founder.

Twisting history can't never erase the truth.

Forget the lies from him.

Mention with reference from the Bible the religion that Jesus Christ came to establish on earth and where he called it “Jehovah’s Witnesses “

Someone who lied that The Name Christianity was of Satan plan reason why God gave them a new name JW.

But see what his own organisation says about the name Christianity in the attached below.

The organisation says Jesus is the FOUNDER OF CHRISTIANITY.

Can both Jesus and Satan founded Christianity?

So taking someone like him serious is an insult to an intelligent mind.

skj1377:
No. The case against Tinubu has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt. It's a presidential case. No rerun either.

You mean all these aren't proven beyond reasonable doubt or you're the one who couldn't see it?

TheMadame:
I am going to tell you something today,you don't come to another person's thread and try to bully your ideas onto them.

Take it easy, don't let your blood rise!

You explain your argument and points succinctly and carefully.

Which I did!

If you have a superior point, everyone will acknowledge and accept that superior argument and learn from it. As such everyone learns and gains from it.

You people and superiority! Are you collecting prize for it?

You on the other hand have come here and been a bully trying to force me to accept what is not correct.

Where did I bully you and force you to accept what is not correct?

Only a blind person or a religious famatic would argue in a weak and watery way that there are no discrepancy in the way the resurrection stories are told in the gospels.

Yes I said it again there is not discrepancies in the four accounts of resurrection but only those with dishonesty will see one there as those accounts never GAVE POINT ON "ONLY"

From the time,to how the event occurred,to the personalities involved,to whether the women told the Apostles or they kept quiet about it. Discrepancies run through the four stories.

About the time 3 said "EARLY IN THE MORNING" except one who used "while still dark" so is this a discrepancy or lack of understanding of time by the critics?

4:00-5:00AM is early in the morning and still dark. So how can a reasonable and honest person sees something wrong with this.

About personalities: they both report PLURAL of WOMEN visited the tomb and no any account used "ONLY"

Are you arguing that ALL THE FOUR MUST REPORT THIS EVENT WORD FOR WORD?

It even makes a lot more sense to even say the difference stems from translations.

Not at all, the problem is inability to reconnect the four reports into one.

Not to come here and bully that there is no discrepancy.

Where did I bully you?

Yes! There's no discrepancy.

Discrepancy will mean one account said there's an earthquake while the other will say THERE'S NO EARTHQUAKE

Or

The women met Angel and another will say the women didn't meet any Angel.

You need to check some of my threads here.

I don't need to.

I am a Christian

Congratulations on that.

but I am not a mindless one who does not ask questions.

I've already said it's good to ask questions.

Me too do ask questions.

TheMadame:
I am not satisfied with your answer.

You never said so, you only quoted definition of discrepancy which is never inline with the OP.

Got a problem with that?

Never!

TheMadame:
Read the OP and the four posts that follow it

I have done that and replied, you forgot?

TheMadame:
Yes,there is.

Point it out!

TheMadame:
Mmmm

Sure: is there DISAGREEMENT between the four ACCOUNTS?

TheMadame:
Good day. Recently I was reading the four gospels (Mathew,Mark,Luke and John) accounts of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ and found that the four accounts are surprisingly very different.

Of course, you can't expect four different authors to pen down something and all we be word for word.

I said surprisingly because I found out that in some accounts it was many women that visited the tomb while in others it was at least two women.
In one account the women ran away and told the Apostles but in other accounts the said nothing. In fact in one account Peter even followed them to the tomb to see for himself.

Sure as different writers give further details to their narrations.

But if you can put them together you'll know they all arrived at the same conclusion.

Discrepancy would've been recorded when one account says it was WOMEN while another says it was MEN.

OR

The women saw Angel and another says the women didn't see any Angel at all.

There is also discrepancies in how the stone in front of the tomb was rolled away. One account says there was an earthquake while other accounts say the women found the stone rolled away when the women arrived at the tomb.

Is this what you called discrepancy?

Discrepancy is when one account says there was an earthquake and the other says there's no earthquake but people rolled the stone away. OR the earthquake happened in the presence of the women and the other says the women saw how the stone was rolled away by the people.

If the women found the stone rolled away before they got there, definitely something had happened.

The accounts also differ on the number of angels at the entrance or inside the tomb. Were they two or was it one angel?

Further details.

I ask these questions because such a significant event such as the resurrection of our Lord should be a constant and consistent account.
I will post the passages from the four gospels for those more enlightened to cast more light and explanation. Thank you.

It's good to ask questions.

But observations from those passages you quoted, one can deduce that some writers just limited their narrations while some give further details.

Courz:
Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

You are too much! You really know how to scatter their Brain. Chai! 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

The truth is, all the criteria used to judge other churches today are what Russell ticked without missing any.

But to deny Russell is to deny the very foundation of JW reason why you see them packaging Russell to be among the saints at all cost.

-Russell came up with the doctrine of 1914
-Russell started Faithful and discreet slaves slogan.
-Russell is the very person Jesus met when Jesus returned to Earth invisibly (even this meeting wasn't audible, vision, dream & physical: then you wonder how did they know Jesus has come and CHOOSE THEM)

So definitely, Russell must be compensated for something but unfortunately, if Russell eventually became part of ruling class then anybody can be irrespective of his/her church yet this is where they always draw the line

Very funny set of deluded people

MaxInDHouse:
I'm quoting you because i've known others are not sincere neither are they faithful that's why only you have been able to confidently mention the name of your church.

Just say you've put yourself in a tight corner

Very soon you'll begin to call him different names

You will notice that i picked interested in your comments immediately you mentioned the name of your church because it shows you don't know why they're all HIDING their religions.

Now the lying liar is claiming people are hidden their RELIGION

So if you're worried because i'm interested in your comments know now that it's because my brother and i sensed a slight difference between you and all these fugitives!

Just say you think it's someone you can deceive with your lies and brainwashing for now but immediately you discover he's not ready to swallow your lies and deceptions then you quickly come out openly with your true color of cursing and abusive language

Courz:
Hahahaha. Anyone would deny such a personality in public. But get this, do you know that their publications always mention Charles Taze Russell? When you read their publications, they paint Russell with so many good words, talking about how he searched for Bible truth, Truth that have now expired. They paint him so well. Their videos about their history have Russell in them. If you go to their Headquarters, they have a library they proudly showcase all the books that Russell wrote. All of them! They showcase him with pride. Yet, in public they deny him so that, as you said Gullible people who don't know anything will fall for their antics.

How does it make sense that you include him in your History and show him proudly in your videos and publications but you deny him in public? Why do you have to lie like that?

You can even see it on this thread how he first painted Russell in bad light but started shipping in the deception of how Russell is still God's anointed

The other one I do call JaNosense said, I don't know God's name so I'm not saved.

I then told him that Russell don't know God's name but you claimed he is saved.

He replied, Russell read Psalms 89:13 (KJV & ASV)

I then told him that, it means I'm saved too since I'm reading Psalms 89:13 and went to further to ask, or should I need to add ASV join?

He changed mouth again.

cornelboy:
See sense

That pass your sense!

plaindealer:



No more eyes on the judiciary, na eyes on Chicago State University remain..

Bunch of losers on another laboring in vain errands..


I like the sub the Uni dropped here, they made sure to categorically use the phrase, Tinubu, President of Nigeria.

They know exactly who graduated and to whom they awarded the degree.

Atiku and Pandora ipobs can continue to entertain us, no wahala, we dey enjoy their entertainment.

So why two different certificates for one person?