₦airaland Forum

Gbola5:
There are no loopholes. Jon is breaking his vow by leaving the Night's Watch. Who would believe him South of the Wall ? The vow says, " It shall not end until my death.", but he's alive, it's like a patient on CPR. The vow also says, " I shall live and die at my post." Live and Die. It also says, " I pledge my life and honor to the Night's Watch, for this night and all the nights to come." All the nights to come. The episode was Oathbreaker afterall.

Gbola5:
It felt like if not for Sansa arriving at Castle Black, then Jon wouldn't have anything else doing. The plot moved Jon.

Gbola5:
They're not from google though. Jon thinks he's better actually. And i stated to choose which one of them you want to as Jon may have been an unreliable narrator at that.

oyetpel:
I noticed, where did the hounds go?

timothyuche1:
When Ramsey 's men were after sansa and Greyjoy, they had with them dogs but later when fight started, the dogs suddenly disappear. Did anyone noticed that?

jonsnow92:
I just hope G.o.t don't eventually fall our hands in the end.
1) Y bring Jon snow back..everyone predicted the red woman would bring him back and she did..[b]What gets many of us glued to G.o.t is d unpredictable nature and their ability to make our guesses go wrong..[/b]You might say Jon has a bigger role to play.if yes then y kill him in d first place
2)The mumu attitude of the khals in the danys episode is somehow..Yes they wanted to show Dany as been strong willed and all but yet not even one khal could think of killing her,instead they just ran around like fools
3) Jon saw Hardhome and he knows that is the rral war yet hes concerned about fighting Ramsay..Yes anyone would want to rescue his brother in that situation but whats in explaining to everyother person what he saw at hardhome..
many more questions and many more fears that in the end i just pray and hope i dont get disappointed
Abeg make them sha Leave Tyrion for me abeg

Ranchhoddas:
how exactly is Ned overrated?

Gbola5:
Jon says that he's a better swordsman but Robb is a better lance. Whether you choose to believe him or not.


He was of an age with Robb, but
they did not look alike. Jon was
slender where Robb was
muscular, dark where Robb was
fair, graceful and quick where
his half brother was strong and
fast.

ilynem:
I don't know if you have read the books, but in the books Ned was an average swords man. The show made him better. That fight in season one he had with Jamie, if that was in the books, he wouldn't last five seconds against Jamie. So the first question is, are we judging from the books or the show? If it's from the books, you can't call great fighters and call Ned. Ned's late brother Brandon was the good swordsman in the family. But if we are going with show, Ned was OK. But there are still better fighters. I can call ten people from the show that would floor Ned. So yes. Drogo was a far better figure than Ned

stonemind:
I keep having this feeling that SANSA or one of the STARKS is going to be killed soon

Gbola5:
Ned is average. He's not really that good. Jaime(before he lost his hand), Barristan, Loras, Arthur would beat Ned anyday. He's more of a commander.

UjSizzle:
Well said. The only boobs we're interested in are Mel's and the Sand Snake's

olyrayy:
Exactly, the show and the books are quite different, I don't blame them though. Most book readers, me inclusive, are usually pissed off when they see books being torn to shreds in the films that adapt them.

Molz:
was she actually forced in that scene? considering the fact that they've being having sex prior to that time.
I think it was kind of rekindling what they both had for eachother.

horlajide:
_{Till you give a plausible justification} This is a daft statement

Kaycee7:
It's a movie thing. In the books, when she entered Drogo's pyre, she emerged unburnt but she was bald. HBO probably decided that a bald Emilia Clarke wouldn't be all that sexy so they extended her fire immunity to her hair. Makes more sense though. Hair is, afterall, a natural part of the body.

horlajide:
Oga leave all the biography aside. Ser Jorah is a skilled knight, I concur. However your tone is exaggerated. [b]His success in the fight with Drogo's bloodrider can be attributed to the fact that he had his armour on, else he would have been killed. [/b]If you are in doubt, please try and watch that scene again.

Akanniade:
No its not love. Its more of awe. Jaime had that same look when he saw Brienne for the first time.

Kaycee7:
Rewatch that season 1 fight and watch last episode's fight. Last episode's bloodrider was something else. The dude was a born fighter in the midst of born fighters. The guy is dead. Don't deny him his glory. He was awesome.

Gbola5:
Their relationship was in no way antagonistic.

Gbola5:
Dany is not immune to fire.

Migines:
Ned can't be held responsible for how people intepreted the story over the years. Ned and dayne were in a fight, Ned came out alive and dayne stayed dead. Only Ned and Reed were present to know how it went. Every other person could have interpreted it to taste and passed it on. Ned on the issue gave credit to Reed. Even though he didn't explain. If bran heard differently, it certainly didn't come from his father. My bet is on his Maester Luwin WHO WASN'T THERE. And about Ned telling it to Jamie, I hardly think so. I can't think of any situation where they could have had the discussion... Certainly not over a bottle of wine.

Gbola5:
He never claimed to Bran he defeated Arthur Dayne himself. It is only what other people interpreted into it.
The scene in the show and conversation between Bran and T3ER suggests that there was something wrong in the story that Bran was told.

He didnt tell Jaime. Ned wasn't a talker

, all everyone else knows was that Ned survived and Arthur Dayne died,

but Ned never lied to his kids and told them true he would have died but for Reed, he wouldn't brag about such a dishonorable fight like it was portrayed in the show.

Gbola5:
Ned never bragged about killing Arthur Dayne, because he didnt.

Gbola5:
It's common knowledge Howland Reed saved his life, and in the original scene Ned did nothing dishonourable. Why are you making a character who died because of his honour appear a dishonourable liar ? He wasn't, why go against the character like this?

You can rewatch the scene. Even Bran was suprised.

Gbola5:
Ned told his children from the time that they were young that Howland Reed saved his life and that he would've been dead but for him. And it became this;
Bran: Father you do not fight with honor
Ned: No... He did.

You might think it minor but its not.