₦airaland Forum

and the essence of this is?




icebucket challenge was for charity et all

this is for what?

Neldrizzy:
https://www.richestlifestyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/David-Oyedepo.jpg
1) David Oyedepo. Net Worth: $150 million
2) Chris Oyakhilome. Net Worth: $50 million.
3) Benny Hinn. Net Worth: $48 million (US).
4) Creflo Dollar. Net Worth: $27 million (US).
5) Billy Graham. Net Worth: $25 million(US).
6) TD Jakes. Net Worth: $18 million (US).
7) TB Joshua. Net Worth: $15 million.
8 ) Matthew Ashimilowo. Net Worth: $10 million.
9) Chris Okotie. Net Worth: $10 million.
10) Joseph Prince. Net Worth: $5 million (Singapore)

http://www.richestlifestyle.com/top-10-richest-pastors-in-the-world/

N Your point is?

How about those that would teach u "a" but set "z" in their exams?
They are very happy to see parallel "fs" n "Es"

While their mates outside this shores get annoyed or even sacked for mass failure .


How about the ones dat r so wicked they'd do anything to frustrate u....because they didn't bag first class, they wouldn't want anyone to!

And the ones that rain failure curses on their generations b4 getting down to d whack bizness that brought them


And the Epic fail ones: they still use their 1802 notebook in lecturing in this century! They don't ever update, nor up grade!
Imagine a lecturer teaching z80 n 8085 processors in dis era!

Superstar007:
The thing is that niggas need to step up their games. When you see a full blooded nigga thanking a girl on fb for accepting their friend request or the bro that keep texting a girl when it obvious she is snubbing you, let me not mention the guy that is ever ready to send babes recharge just to outdo his "competitors" why won't these get into their heads. As for me, if I text you once and you don't reply or I feel like I'am the one doing all the talking, this brother got no time to waste before deleting you.

That's why j always advise guys to get them dough first, hone their skills n set the bar so high up there only few ladies can attain. Unless ofcos u just need some object of passionate pleasure ,u don't ping, u roll out ( to an area with dense density of em n use ur hunk)

As for them Facebook nitwitts, I totally ignore them n use that very thing they like about d gurl to spin jokes ! We always stand out n out stand

Have u noticed it yet? That guys like us only spend because it's our usual routine, we just invited her along to share d space? Not cos we wano impress?

Ain't no time for thrash!
I am the one that usually keep their bum waiting on dah long line now. I've got what they all need ... And they know I'm not available yet still they crawl over....feed them back on their coin . so Kul to have d control knob. The view is better from that end.
Whooohoo!

Vessi:
wicked! At last sentence.

Mprex:
my God! why are you sounding so pained Seems like you are really a victim of this ish!

Vic wor? Sorry to disappoint u.
A lion does not turn a puccupine at the flip of d coin. If every guy was like yours truly, men would eat at the very exalted tables they were fashioned for n not scrub scraps ...

Let's say I'm a voice of correction to these whack guys that don't know that not for naughts were they born .
N to C snubs like u who think d sun shines out of ur bu77s , try something more challenging like having Kul people who u can hv intellectual talks with n r challenging, not having 500bbm contacts yet none got brains.

"No disrespect buh I killa queen !"






Btw, how twisted can u get? Advertizing ur pin on ur signature so u can hv more recharge card clients? N when they don't send, u turn blind eyes to their pings ?

emitope:
dude, u just made my .......hour

Isn't it just anonyingly amazing ?

some dudes go chasing for months n can't get a game, yet others just meet same gurl and under an hour be smacking it real good.

This one thing I tell guys: get ur shytes together n get them dough ...... money ain't never wrong.

Then instead of pinging , u call em with a sleek hunk
Instead staying up all night hoping she returns ur call, u be changing 9ners like a piece of apparel . n don't hv to visit same forest twice if it ain't worth it.
U were created da boss, stop selling short n take d role gallantly !

Made For More

datguyojay:
So wat r we supposed to do

Share urs n stop forming Don Jazzy Jor!

Mprex:
Lol. I'm sooooo guilty of this.
So many unreplied messages on my facebook, bbm and e-mail



its not like a ignore the messages with any purposeful intent sha. Juzt that most times i'm busy, bored with your chats or i feel there is really nothing for us to talk about

Oh yea? Sure given, I know guys can be really boring n ish. But ehmmmm, is it so hard a task to just use the d delete button?
Quit d cheap excuses: u just simply derive great pleasure from seeing so many pending msges. Gives u a sense of cheap importance huh?
Rubs up ur ego, makes a princess outa all ur ugly a33es doesn't it?

I don't blame u gurls, the blame is fully on ma wussbags male folks who swallow alota shytes from u folks

MarthaK:
"Send me some of your pics"
"What are you wearing now"
"Send me a hot pic"
Are you mad?

Too weak a reason

Ehmmm is there any guy that whack n old sch?
What kinda guys u roll with?

BTW, u gladly make humping vids with em big boiz n r glad to use their phones for a nu8e selfie so other gurls knows he's hooked .....

Daninya1:
I really can't fathom why a lady will ignore her male Friends on any of the social network.. They seem not to care when you are online.. But, they are quick to respond with the speed of light when you send your Pm.. Some will even ignore it for days and you knowing fully well that that the message was delivered and read.. Some of your messages will never be replied... Why do Ladies act so cold and paranoid on social networks..
My sister once told me that she ignores her boo sometimes knowing fully well that he is online... Lollxxx... My girlfriend also does same... but, she answers my pm without delay... If you don't pm them, they will ask whether you didn't notice them online.. A friend of mine once deleted his cousin sisters on account of these...
So ladies, why do you act the way you act on social networks... Or is there something we guys are not saying or doing right??.. .

U know why? Cos her big deddies don't hv time for chit chats . they call her to meet em in so and so hotels . what time does she have to respond to ur lil whack talks when she is rumping and humping?
Go make them money dudes . let em be

Nah, none of the reasons above , they are just simply applying d basic law of economics: the scarce the commodity, the higher the price.

Greater demand = higher price
N guys tend to not only appreciate it wen she responds but also value her all d more!

She feel very important n elated so many guys r on d roll call n she takes her time to filter.

How so annoying: there r two tins I don't torelate

1) u keep me waiting for a reply wen I see u online: u so gone !
2) don't take my calls nor call back , gone ! So many come back begging...oh if all men were like yours truly!

MarvellousGod:
I don't stand anywhere! !!!!


I must make decisions with my husband, I must have a say.. we must talk things over, he can't just decide alone.... Nobody has the final say in a marriage, decisions should be reached by both couples. ..


btw, why are you men not disputing my first point??

Your first point is nothing but a bait to turn your man into a she-male runt n all men would mos def resist this! Keep ur Kash . we were doing just fine , thanks. It is because of ur type we got the 3rd model.

God help that man that U WUD marry. Cos tlhe wud pay the bride price only for u to assume control d next day.

jumzzy448:
model 3. let me work and keep my money. so if anything comes up and hubby is not readily available, i can shoulder the responsibility.

Ghost wify ! Here is to those who would rather watch u suffer n die claiming they don't hv only for them to buy the best coffin for ur buriah!

hoyinkansola:
lol.. vewi funny..

Don't just laugh n leave, tell us some stunts u'v pulled for luv jor

Ninilowo:
Yes oooooo............. Just one film like that..... the title is.......... USA '94 starring: NIGERIA & ITALY

Men don't cry! We just supper strain d heart n because all veins n artillaries hv their root in there, the heart strain spreads to d eyes which bcomes so red as we stare into d distant past

omenka:
What manner of school did some of you guys attend really??

... And this construct of yours is perfect ? Huh?
U got a log right in your eyes , yet you go about pointing out lil dent in another's ....

@ op, I'm glad we could get to the bottom of this.

I look forward to an unreserved apologies from the SA government . if not, we'd start their malhanding with MTN

omenka:
What manner of school did some of you guys attend really??

... And this construct of yours is perfect ? Huh?
U got a log right in your eyes , yet you go about pointing out lil dent in another's ....

Richard Taylor, a spokesman of the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority, believes it is just a matter of time before we see more widespread use of mobile devices on aircraft, but that calls will remain banned during take-off or landing for the foreseeable future.
“When regulators like us are convinced that an aircraft can be used safely even with portable electronic devices being used in the cabin, that the signal being emitted from the cabin at any stage of the flight can be safely absorbed without affecting any of the aircraft systems, of course the rules will be relaxed,” he says. “But it’s up to the manufacturers, and of course to the airlines, to prove that they are operating the aircraft safely.”
Perhaps that day may come soon. However, having learnt how difficult it is to prove definitively that planes are safe from interference, I'll be making sure my phone is properly switched off in future. After all, when I'm en route to my holiday in the sun, I don't want my handset to be responsible for tricking the pilot into landing in some rainy old place. Or for something even worse.

Source: bbc.com/future/story/20130604-why-we-turn-devices-off-on-planes

A 2006 analysis of the database identified 125 reports of interference from electronic gadgets, of which 77 were defined as "highly correlated". In one incident a 30-degree error in navigation equipment was immediately corrected when a passenger turned off a portable DVD player. This problem reoccurred when the device was switched back on. Fight crew have reported a number of similar cases in which they have watched readings on navigations systems change apparently in response to passengers being asked to turn specific devices on and off. In another report, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) identified 75 separate incidents of possible electronic interference that pilots believe were linked to mobile phones and other electronic devices between 2003 and 2009.
In the competitive world of aviation, some airlines such as Virgin Atlantic and Delta Airlines have started advertising the use of technologies that allow greater use of mobile devices on flights. In-flight mobile phone systems such as OnAir and AeroMobile use miniature on-board base stations called picocells which allow devices to transmit at lower power levels. Transmissions are processed, transmitted to a satellite and then on to the normal ground networks. This, says AeroMobile chief executive Kevin Rogers, enables the use of mobiles “as a roaming service just like when you go to a foreign country, except that in a foreign country you don’t need a satellite link.” Some airlines are now starting to fit AeroMobile equipment during production.
These systems allow you to use your phone while at cruise altitude, but not during take-off and landing. Rogers thinks that this might change one day, but at the moment it is still difficult to “prove categorically that there is indeed no interference – so airlines tend to err on the side of caution and be conservative.”
But as Rogers adds: “Many phones are always left on anyway. If there was a real risk of interference of a mobile phone or an iPad with the aircraft’s systems, people would not be allowed to take them on the aircraft at all.”
Some air authorities remain unconvinced, however. In-air mobile services cannot be used in US airspace, for example. The US Federal Aviation Administration has come under pressure to relax its rules and last year set up a group of experts to study the question. A decision is expected by the end of this year.

Mobile phones and other gadgets could interfere with sensitive electronic systems, some theories suggest. So why is it still so difficult to prove the truth behind the claims?

I have a guilty secret to confess. My plane was preparing for take-off from London’s Heathrow Airport in March when a flight attendant made the usual request for passengers to turn their electronic devices off. Far from complying, I pushed my smartphone deeper into my pocket. I had important work messages to check, and surely my little handset wasn’t going to cause the plane to plummet from the sky, was it?

It seems I'm not alone. A recent survey found around four out of 10 US air passengers admitted they don’t always turn their gadgets off on flights. One notable occasion saw the actor Alec Baldwin reacting furiously on Twitter after being kicked off a Los Angeles-to-New York flight before take off for refusing to stop playing the online game Words With Friends on his phone.

According to regulations, which are pretty uniform around the world, the use of portable electronic devices is not allowed below around 3,000m (10,000ft), even in "flight mode” which stops the transmission of signals. Above this height devices like laptops and music players can be used, but phones must remain off. These rules are important, we are told, to avoid potentially dangerous interference between signals from these devices and sensitive onboard electronic systems. But do these fears have any scientific basis, or is it time to relax the rules?

The fear of interference comes from the fact that gadgets connect to the internet or to mobile phone networks using radio waves. To explain the theoretical dangers, Peter Ladkin, Professor of Computer Networks and Distributed Systems at Bielefeld University, Germany, uses the analogy of holding a blowtorch to your household heating pipes. The central heating system in your house makes changes based on the readings of thermometers within those pipes, so the blowtorch will heat the water, change the temperature readings and trigger the system to make adjustments.

Personal mobile devices could act in a similar way on aeroplanes, on which hundreds of electronics-based systems, known as avionics, are used for navigation, to communicate with the ground and to keep track of the components that keep them in the air. Some involve sensors that communicate information to cockpit instruments. It's not just an issue with mobile phones. Kindles, iPods, laptops, handheld gaming consoles – they all emit radio waves. If these are at frequencies close to those of the avionics, signals and readings could be corrupted. This could affect systems such as radar, communications and collision avoidance technology, and the problem is potentially magnified if gadgets are damaged and start emitting stronger radio waves than they should, or if signals from multiple devices combine.
So much for the theory, but is there any proof that this is a problem? There are no known recorded incidents of crashes having been definitely caused by such interference, but that said the causes of accidents can sometimes remain unknown. A flight recorder may not identify that a critical system has failed because of electromagnetic interference from passengers’ devices.
System malfunction

But while definite proof may be lacking, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that the risks should be taken seriously. A report summarising 50 cases of safety issues thought to have been caused by personal electronic devices, was published in January this year. These were compiled from the US Aviation Safety Reporting System, a database maintained by Nasa, to which crew members can anonymously submit reports of safety problems. One such case was summarised as follows: "First Officer reports compass system malfunctions during initial climb. When passengers are asked to verify that all electronic devices are turned off the compass system returns to normal.”

firstEVA:
yes its only guys

Like huh?

There are more broke gurls than there are ants in this universe . and just to keep up, they borrow their friend's shoes, cloths , earrings , bags, jewelries , cars , human hairs .... To mention but a tiny few.
They sip garri @ home and come forming tongue twisting when ordering stuffs @ fast fud( when guys take em out)

@ op, have u ever seen where an herbalist gave arms? Or the sun shine @ night?

99% of gurls r herbalists when it comes to releasing their own duh.

D guy's money is for everybody,theirs is theirs alone! Only heavens knw what they do with their money. We still make their hairs,fix their nails,take em shopping et all.

Lil wonder very few of em are wealthy in the world

Epic!

If fPhone 6 can do all these, what is left for zPhone10 now?

Hello United Fam

The joy I feel to go thru this international break on the back of that win against Everton , can only be imagined .

How would I have survived with my team sh1ting down EPL table if we had lost that match?
Now we top 4, two weeks to spare, bois wud be retuning from injuries , youth revelations and the team gelling !

Let this two weeks come and pass on! We gas to return

Epic fail

lynpetra:
A tale of a worthless,i:idioti,and notorious cheating wife with her indisciplined,insensitive and cursed boyfriend(she is not your ex,you are already fuckkkkking the mistake of a wife).i only pray you Guys are caught and she is thrown out to the street!Usless combo.

Lyn? Didn't know u cud rain brime stone n fire like this oooo

Congrats op!

As much as this is a good news, the unemployed should seek for ways of creating jobs instead of searching sitting searching n whiling away!

Bliv me, itz a far rewarding adventure! N u couldn't imagine the joy that comes with feeding families, touching lives positively!

U r here to solve a problem , earlier d beta u locate it

MrRainBigxtorm:
So what's your point...?I think there only flop in it is the bypass of Windows 9,they should've done the upgrading as usual, now it's kind of disturbing with all the data's they collect from user,,,,

It is no flop: the Win10 is a fresh build from scratch, But MS didn't want to do a major name change like xp to vista. They skipped 9 to tell u that this is not a continuation but a fresh breed .

Data collection is only done on d test version , it would stop when major ish has been identified n patched.

Saw the review on YouTube .

It has so many sleek features and revamping d cmd prompt is just one of then outstanding ones.

It combines the functionality of win7 with d p1mp-feel of win8 but they say its a built from scratch Win(like moving from xp to vista)

Id most def run a test version