₦airaland Forum

Sixfiguresmart:
I understood your entire logic. If you find it difficult to explain, then you are not solid on that point yet. I was pushing you to your limit cos I saw that your conclusion wasn't strong enough. I knew that If I pushed you harder, you would do a few research that will improve your knowledge on the subject.
That is not a fact. Americans have not refuted that. That is only hearsay. do not peddle hearsay plagiarize bloggers. Get your facts straight from reputable establishments. If you discredit it, that is your respected personal opinion. But do not make a blanket statement that will get you in trouble.
You are now the one peddling lies. Cos' the US has not called it a lie. You are now the lie seller. Where are you getting your facts?
I am not saying that I refute all the discoveries. I am just trying to make sense of the trend. It is suddenly becoming a cliché if in each year we make extraordinary discoveries like this repeatedly.

The foot prints of Dinosaurs are ridiculous to say the least. The dating makes them even easier to dispel.

you're not pushing me to any limit, I'm just too busy to type or reply messages currently. I have every evidence that America has never been to the moon. I don't say what I'm not sure of. When I'm less busy I'll reply all your messages.

Sixfiguresmart:
You are conflicting issues here. Two places to get evidence are places with UNENDING ice, and life started in the WORLD. Where is this unending ice located, in the world or the astrodome? Are your referring to the arctic?

One thing that you and I agree here is that there was a beginning. What do we know before the beginning? Only the Bible provides such information. No other book in history can affirmatively tell you a single fact. What science is doing is not fact finding but carbon dating. The Bible did not provide a clue regarding how long the earth stayed before creation in it began. The answers has been very clear from the earlies. Nothing but water. Which is evidential as 71 percent of the earth is water. When life started in the world, the animal/human body does not decompose to ice, does it? Why do we have to search in unending ice when the body becomes dust eventually just as the bible says? Rather than searching in the ice for clues, the earth holds more evidence than ice can produce.

Your ice analogy comes from the ice age theory that scientist up till date have not been able to produce. Their pants are sweting right now as heat waves expose more of the lies that they have told over the years. They claimed that the ice ice altered climates and froze waters, thereby freezing the dinosaurs. Over the past 30 years, the oldest and thickest ice in the Arctic has declined by a stunning 95%. Not a single Dinosaur bone or fur strand was discovered after 95% decline. What did the almighty scientists do? They discarded this theory and distanced themselves from it. This is the theory that you are promulgating. Scientist have long seen the damage in such theory. Apply caution when you recommend such school of thought.

One question that you can ponder hard about is, if science cannot give us the age of the earth, where did the 4.5 billion years come from?
Earth didn't exist 3000 years ago, and humans did not exist prior to Adam which is arguably less than 7000 years.

You are relying on carbon dating which is extremely difficult to date for samples that are older than about 40,000 years. So, how were they able to go beyond 4.5 BILLION years? Scientists have long recognized that carbon dating is subject to error. So, how how has this invention performed so far? Still Science only provides an ESTIMATION. As a matter of fact, the calculation of the formation of the earth is based on an astronomical rock. Follow this: Science claims evolution, things EVOLVES, then uses rocks from meteorites and rocks gotten from Apollo Expeditions to the Moon to ascertain an estimated number not for the moon, but for the earth. Tell me about rocket science. I will post a link here so you can track this scientific fluctuating theories of science.
https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/1553-age-of-the-earth-timeline

Now, Apollo Expeditions to the Moon did not go with Uralmash-15000 to get rock from a deeper depth. As you can see in the videos, they picked rocks from the surface. Common sense knows that to get a near perfect age of something that EVOLVED, you have to drill deeper. But, stones on the surface of the moon is carbon dated and presented as the fact. Come on, men! We can do better.

So, watch out for more twists and new carbon dates as NASA prepares to launch a new ambitious drilling mission, set to launch for the Moon in 2022.

Is this the science that you trust? That taught you 9 planets and now teaching your kids 8 planets? Your grand kids could end up with 7 planets.

and with all your knowledge you believe in the Bible? Yeah, you're about to defend it. Don't stress yourself, I think you should focus your research knowledge on the existence of the Bible. What you don't know is greater than what you do. I don't have the energy to argue to convince anyone. But sooner than now you'll understand.

Sixfiguresmart:
Well, you are talking to someone with over 60 countries under the soles of his feet. I don't know where you want me to travem to now? Been to Egypt 2 times. What do you want to tell me about the pyramid that wasn't discovered. It has been standing for centuries before the archaeologists discovering plastic mummies and graphic footprints were born.

It is not rocket science to see the folly in all these nonsense, Sir. As I ain't smarter than millions, also refuse to be as stupid as the gullibles. I know science when I see one. I know stupidity when I see one too.

What artefacts are kept in places? The pyramids? Sir, kindly tell the that you didn't go believing all these scameologists. Do not be one of the deluded. There was no kife 133 million years ago. Funny how all their number ring in million with fresh prints that go back to 3000 years only.

You mean, the dinosaurs walked on snow? Or snow has preserved it for 133 million years? Other scientists claim that they were here 50,000 years ago. This one came up with 133 million years. And then, when did they EVOLVE? Which is the subject of the matter.

Is fossil and footprints the best diacoveries in the 21st century?

Sir, even in the 17th century people have been doing that without the advancements in technology and science. What should I applaud now?

That in the heart of the 21 century a diacovery this mammoth cannot be captured on camera for the public to see?
The last diacovery was the expedition by James cameron. Proof and evidence attest to it. No shade, no secrets.

So, life began in Africa, yes? And, relics of all pasts are discovered elsewhere. How plausibme is that?

Ask them to reconcile their facts and revert. Cos if I ever prssented a case like theirs in court, I'd be thrown out.

centuries to come, our existence will be argued just like we are deliberating on whether there was life older than what we believed. Earth didn't just exist 3000 years ago, but if we were good with carbon dating, we'd be able to separate the truth from lies.

Life didn't start in Africa, but Africans had the oldest documents science could lay their hands on. Life started equally in the world. Two places to get evidence are the places with unending ice and unending heat. You can point out where I speak of.

Earth is old, how old ? No one knows.

Sixfiguresmart:
Well, you are talking to someone with over 60 countries under the soles of his feet. I don't know where you want me to travem to now? Been to Egypt 2 times. What do you want to tell me about the pyramid that wasn't discovered. It has been standing for centuries before the archaeologists discovering plastic mummies and graphic footprints were born.

It is not rocket science to see the folly in all these nonsense, Sir. As I ain't smarter than millions, also refuse to be as stupid as the gullibles. I know science when I see one. I know stupidity when I see one too.

What artefacts are kept in places? The pyramids? Sir, kindly tell the that you didn't go believing all these scameologists. Do not be one of the deluded. There was no kife 133 million years ago. Funny how all their number ring in million with fresh prints that go back to 3000 years only.

You mean, the dinosaurs walked on snow? Or snow has preserved it for 133 million years? Other scientists claim that they were here 50,000 years ago. This one came up with 133 million years. And then, when did they EVOLVE? Which is the subject of the matter.

Is fossil and footprints the best diacoveries in the 21st century?

Sir, even in the 17th century people have been doing that without the advancements in technology and science. What should I applaud now?

That in the heart of the 21 century a diacovery this mammoth cannot be captured on camera for the public to see?
The last diacovery was the expedition by James cameron. Proof and evidence attest to it. No shade, no secrets.

So, life began in Africa, yes? And, relics of all pasts are discovered elsewhere. How plausibme is that?

Ask them to reconcile their facts and revert. Cos if I ever prssented a case like theirs in court, I'd be thrown out.

how do I make this easy for you to understand. We all know scientists can be crazy most times, like for example when America said they've been to the moon.
Which was later discovered by the same Americans that no one has actually been to the moon, it's all staged.

But we wouldn't use these lies to justify the rest as false. The foot prints were discovered, many will go to verify if it's tire or not. Man has been walking the surface of the Earth even before science came to existence.

[center][/center]

Sixfiguresmart:
Just the fact that as a child, I watched the discovery of Egyptian mummies on video recording and today, I am shown pictures is staggering. To know that James Cameron has video recording of the Mariana Trench and all these discoveries that happen in distances that a child can easily walk, have no video recording is mind-boggling.

How can I believe these pictures that I myself can create on a computer? Where is the place that it has not become a tourist attraction. From the Dinosaurs footprints to this. Tell us the location, we can go and verify these 133 million years footprints.

The reverse storyline of the African ghost that goes to a foreign land to father children is what we are seeing. Africans can neither tell you the place where the ghost who fathered the ghost babies was born nor the family that it happened to. It is all about "one man", and "one place".

you need to travel often. The Egyptian pyramids still standing, and artefacts are perfectly kept in places where they should be. Not everything is done with a PC. You're not smarter than billions of people walking the surface of the Earth.

iamyemiakins:
Make these Archaeologists dey try regulate their lies na. If dinosaur pass ontop cement wey dem just lay sef wey later dry, I no sure say you go see the clear footprints again after 10 years, in such environment

get sense abeg

Evolution

[quote author=AloneTK post=115946900][/quote]the dude looks happy.

drunkpunk:
Open to reasonable offers...
Nationwide delivery...

how the one Wey you hold take resemble the one Wey dey Amazon?

I just book space, I no even read the write up

solidgold:
LG 8KG WASHING MACHINE. CALL 07082083024. NA GIVEAWAY PRICE

how much and location?

woodboi:
Clearance sale

Washing machine - 30k

And a 12kg cylinder - 10k

Call - 07011602585
07066649542

location?

donbenie:
Only him alone with 8 women lying about him?
Na only him Waka come?

they can do anything for Money and fame.

Peritome:
Killer shot. So had it been a human, the human would have died.

Airplane are more fragile than humans. A little bird can bring down an airplane.

Peritome:
Killer shot. So had it been a human, the human would have died.

Airplane are more fragile than humans. A little bird can bring down a plane.

oloet:
product appearance variation is different from selling grade C as grade A knock off....

yeah, but the buyer was judging based on the pictures used for advertisement.

oloet:
I have been in this situation before with a seller here, they post pictures of the original and send you a last grade sneakers... I counted my losses and moved on when I saw the rubbish I got... for heaven sake I know I am not buying the original but haba, don't send me what will make me swear for you....

it's everywhere, Amazon, eBay, Jumia, Konga, AliExpress. Things don't always appear the way they are in pictures when you see them in reality, that's why these stores makes room for reviews. That's why I always say originality is key.

Who the Bleep is jalingo in that picture, because they all seem less concerned and happy in that picture.

Akwamkpuruamu:
So he was with a knife besides him while dreaming. The story no clear

sleep walking. Such people can be sleeping and yet travel to Nasarawa state.

Copy and paste professors. All they know is to embark on strike for their personal interest.

BenNash:
How do I prepare the soya beans please?

remember once again, small quantity. Unless you wan use all your money take treat your dog.

quadrikosemani:
Pls help am already noticing ticks on her body,although they said I should use Adi agbon but I don't know if it will work.

go to a pet store and get tick spray.

Grandmeister:
You lie! Cold blooded animals have high intelligence too. They can recognise faces and respond to commands. You think they survived all these time with no intelligence? It has been proven that crocodiles and gators recognise their benefactors. Turtles fo too,

you amaze me, just for the record.

FreeStuffsNG:
Wow!!There are actually legitimate licensed folks in this kind of business.
Doing it illegal is a big risk that is not worth it at all.
check my signature for freebies!

its not about bringing it into the country, they were worried about the animals survival.