If this is proves to be a complex case for their FA to handle, then they should check for his relationship with the female player and staff of their national team, people who know him should come forward for and present instances where such similar behaviour might have occided in the past. This should form whatever strict sentence they might want to hand down on him, if none is found, a suspension with strict warning should be given.

thesilentman:
She is married and a senior in my department. She never got tired complimenting my eloquence-always says she likes the way i speak.

Everyday,she'd wait for me so we can work together out of the plant and anyday i tell her i ain't ready for home yet,she gets clearly pissed.We chit-chat a lot.

Yesterday,she cosied up to my desk,as usual and said,in the presence of fellow colleagues,"Baby...oh,sorry,mr bla bla bla..."

Everyone was gobsmacked cos that's the same way she addresses her hubby who ocassionally drops her at work.

Now tongues have been wagging on account of that incidence-that both of us are probably...

I tried to dismiss the matter by saying that it was a freudian slip but my colleagues who were not having any of it,just told me to be careful.

Wahala dey o!

Was she nonplussed after the she said that? If no, then she prolly is intentional about the signal. She might even be casual about the way she said it, but still she's giving you a subtle signal, maybe she think you're not paying attention, and the best way to do this is to be casual about, that's if she said it casually. It's a way of setting you up to whatever that comes after, which now solely depends on your conviction.

Was ocean drive not rothmans advert song that year?

As long as you're sure of what you know in your field of study, what need to be work on before the next interview should be your confidence. You can do this by putting yourself in a situation that mimics you being in the interview. It will elevate your boldness and ability to deliver. You know sometimes in situations like this, it's not what you know, but how to get what you know in your head out, and deliver it coherently. That's the first place where confidence lies. Take a deep breath and don't rush. Those are the basic things, and it works all the time, people just don't realise this. You're even free to take short pause whenever you are asked a question just to properly form your answer to deliver them. Like I said, Do not rush. The only problem in all of this is, if you're not sure of what you know.



Sidekick. If you really need this job, and you eventually got picked. You really need to be thankful to the man amongst the panel who chose to give you a second chance. I hope you won't fluff your chance this time. I wish you all the best this time.

Emotions shouldn't be cloud judgement, even if it shows a sense of remorse. Laws should be maintained. Leniency can be pleaded, but sentenced must first be served.

You're obviously high on moonrock

TemplarLandry:
Only archaic men with lowest of the lowest self-esteem imprison their wives under the guise of housewifehood.

Women are not dullards or nonentities. They have parts to play in every functional society. A real woman has to make some money for herself too.

Being a housewife means you're only useful to your husby as a copulation machine and a babies-producing device. Zero contribution to a functional society. That's bad bad.

You think being an housewife is being useless. This is one of the self harm we do to ourselves.

The heading should be "Some Men finds it difficult to adjust to the reality of their high earning wives"

Lol, copier salesman . Same America's format of the salesman story, of how they hit goldmine by starting out as a mere salesman.

Amigoss:
What a simp,what a finished man!!! He needs to read Shola's book and get sage advice from nairaland red-pill influencers for some red-pilling.

You broke, u still dey form redpilling.

@helinues. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

This is similar to what buhari is doing, tbh, to move to a digitised based economy will ensure accurate and more tailored tax economy, its now up to the government to be accountable for tax paid by the citizens.

Everyone is Africa's enemy . What if Africa's enemy is Africa? You know, just saying

We have the potentials and brains for a Literate country, but the system is limiting the growth of these potentials. If the system is okay, you'll see the figure drops drastically. If the system is exciting and attractive enough, it will ignite children's interest in education. Kids are naturally curious beings, and the school is one of the place to explore their curiosities. If the schooling system is not attractive enough, without sound instructors too, kids will be disinterested in schooling. If you want to fix anything in a nation, fix education first and make enabling environment that will encourage people to learn. Then you'll see other things fall into place. A nation of enlightened people will not want her country to decend in chaos. Unfortunately, most of our politician does not care, b3cause the system with which they ascend the postion was rigged. So they don't bitter to make a favourable environment for education so that people eyes won't be open, they rather lead a nation of blinds, they want to lead , but not a people with open eyes.


One thing I'll love to be introduced into our curriculum is the art of rational thinking and philosophy. It needs to be introduced early enough to kids. You'd be surprised by the result.

Everything to remind him of Kim.

PrinceOfLagos:
Aboki is not insult

Go ask the meaning of aboki, it's not insult

You're stupid. Stupid is not an insult

To everyone saying she's using him, why not also question why he brought up the issue of paying the daughter's school fees, when he asked the question of why he was denied of sex. Its pretty obvious you're being nice to her to get into her panties. That's straight up your mission! Stop deceiving yourself cos every fake emotions and affections you're currently displaying towards her will eventually fade once you dip your hands into her honey pot. The fact that you asked the question of "why sex is getting hard to get these days" shows that you're not into her for marriage,but to satisfy your konjiness. In doing so, to make her fall, you shouldered her responsibility by paying her daughter's school fees. Abeg who send you work? Kuku say you've been sex starved, and one can then proffer the appropriate solution to your konji dilenma

OGIBRA:

His work that deal with anytin that create division among nigerians only, is that a gud work?
What is his investigation about oil theft n fuel scarcisty?
What is his sugeestions about cbn new policy n d new naira notes?
What is his opinions about the partial opening of second niger bridge?, all these affect majority of nigerians, no matter, their tribe or religion,hope u can also kindly tel me, why is he not interested in all that? Apart from divisive story and individual attacks...
I.O.T

Bring your head here and let me check what's inside your brain because I dont know how this bullcrap you typed made sense to you. Over 40 people were killed in what is perceived to be systemic ethnically religion cleansing, and you want this to be swept under the carpet for more fancy news story? Are you sure you're okay laikdis . No be person wey dey alive dey cross Niger bridge, no be person wey dey upright dey breathe they spend new notes. Do you know how many people were killed in southern kaduna this year alone, and you're here criticising someone's else effort in exposing the massacre that's has barely had the recognition for a proper discussion on what need to be done to prevent these attacks. I don't think you're okay. If it's your loved ones, you won't type this trash

Joey4321:
If a comet was that close to earth tonight

You and I wouldn't be here exchanging messages.

They are rarely harmful, most comets burns off in the earth atmosphere upon entering, because they are icy objects that when they pass by the sun, they leave a trail of gas as tail. These gas trails also contribute to their speed, and also they evaporate in the cloud mostly before reaching earth's atmosphere. If you have anything space hazard to be worried about, it should be the asteroids, which are heavier, as a result of gravitational force attraction between these dust. They were formed early in the evolution of the solar system, when there were a lot of attarctions between objects like ice, dusts and gas. They are formed and harden into rocks, they constitute the object that are gravitational bound in the solar system. They are destructive on an extinction level .

They were the culprit in the extinction of the dinsoasurs , which gave rise to the evolution of mammals. Thier impact was found to be destructive on a nuclear extinction level. The hiroshima nuclear blast pales in comparison to the impact of the asteroids that wiped off the dinosaur. It cause massive climate changes on a global scale. Earth experienced scorching temperature rise within the moments and times of and after the impacts, followed by a devastating temperature drop. This caused most photosynthetic activities to halt, because the sun which is responsible for photosynthesis was blocked out. It made many large animals that roamed this period to die out, starting with the plant eaters to the meat eaters. So in essence, its really the asteroid we should be worried about. Its a civilisation ending event, if it were to happen, because we are not readily prepared for it.

Yes connection will go a long way, but you need to put into account the devotion and character of the "would be " Messi. Messi put his heart and soul in the pitch each time. It's not really about finding the next messi. To me, I'd say that's not even far fetched. Most Nigerian players are just so comfortable with the way they play once they reach Europe. The motivation to be better than the level of football that brought them to Europe in the first place is got extinguished once they're signed to an European club. That's why we have mediocre footballers in our national teams. No drive to be better than what we hail them for.

Save for osimehen that's really working hard to better himself, all others are bunch of mediocre, couple with attitude problem. Also the urge to show off, as if they play football only for the paychecks. Its really annoying. Look at chukwueze, and ask yourself an honest question, if his game has improved. He's still stuck in the hype of his breakout performance in villareal. Nigerian players need to do more for themselves !

TenQ:

So, you are saying that the Manufacturer shouldn't have created the computer.

But,
Don't forget that the computer was created by the manufacturer to be of USE to him: Are you saying that the purpose and needs of the Manufacturer is unimportant?

Let me make myself clear. @the bolded , it's up to him to have created the computer in the first place, but know this, a computer virus is cannot exist without a computer to infect. Abi na u computer virus wan infect?

TenQ:

Computer system is not the same as Computer!
Highly confusing!

You may rephrase your question please!

. You're the one confusing your self. Dont let semantics confuse you.

This is quora definition of a computer system. �


Simple answer 1: a computer is like an engine whereas a computer system is like a vehicle (a car or truck or boat) that contains one or more engines and does something more complex than what the engine does. But the engine is the essential component that enables the vehicle to do what it does.

Simple answer 2: a computer exists in a single place and does a primitive set of functions. A computer system combines a computer with many other things to perform a complex set of functions. It can also exist in a single place, but it may exist in many places at the same time.

More elaborate answer: A computer is a device that does certain things (mostly very basic data manipulation and mathematical functions), just as a building is a device that does certain things (such as housing offices or apartments). What makes a computer special is that it does these things very very quickly. A computer system is a mechanism that incorporates multiple computers along with other things like data storage devices, networks, and data paths (ways to move data around among storage devices and computers), as well as software (rules for how to do things), procedures and processes and protocols and on and on. A computer system performs a rather complex function, just as a city is a system that involves multiple buildings along with roads, sewage treatment plants, water and electrical systems and many other things that enable it to perform a function considerably more complex than the function performed by a building.

A major advance in the field of computing was the advent of networking. Before that, computers had to be near each other in order to communicate with each other and computer systems typically existed in a relatively small physical location where all the computers were in the same place. If you see a movie released in the period from roughly 1950 to 1980, you will note that computers and computer systems were typically depicted as gigantic things located in a large room. With networking, a computer system might have computers in one place, remote access devices in another place, and other computers in other places. Thus a building might have computers and terminals and printers and what have you all over it, all capable of communicating with each other. The internet, which enables world wide networks, has made it possible to have computer systems that consist of thousands of computers (or more), located all over the globe.

Whether I use a computer or a computer system, it doesn't matter. A Computer virus cannot exist without a computer or a computer system. Whichever you choose to do with.

TenQ:

Are you saying that:
The manufacturer should NOT have created computers SO THAT Viruses will NOT exist?

This seems to be your argument!

This is my stance once again. A Computer system needs to exist for a computer virus to exist. Do you have any opposing argument. Please present them, then we can thrash it out

TenQ:

SMH!
1. I didn't speak of ANY computer system
2. Except your solution is that :
To ELIMINATE computer VIRUSES, it is sufficient to eliminate all COMPUTERS.

A Computer VIRUS is a kind of low level computer program made by a malicious software programmer.

In this case, the computer is good UNTIL the user introduces a FOREIGN Trojan gift into it.

This is what you said down here�

When the manufacturer creates the laptop computer, does he load it with virus?
OR
Virus get into the computer because the USER connected an unverified software source accessing the computer?

And I replied you. I asked if there's no computer system, how will computer virus exist. So Where's the confusion in my reply.


You even replied again with this�

You even replied that Except your solution is that :
To ELIMINATE computer VIRUSES, it is sufficient to eliminate all COMPUTERS

So obviously you understood my reply.


And also you said,

I didn't speak of ANY computer system

When you initially started with this�

When the manufacturer creates the laptop computer, does he load it with virus?
OR
Virus get into the computer because the USER connected an unverified software source accessing the computer?

Or is it my use of "computer sytem" that's confusing you?

TenQ:

When the manufacturer creates the laptop computer, does he load it with virus?
OR
Virus get into the computer because the USER connected an unverified software source accessing the computer?

. Incorrect bro. If there's no such thing as a computer "system", how will a computer virus exist . Try harder next time.

No matter how y'all spin it. Imperfection has always and will always be part of creation. We only want to turn a blind eye to it .

Kobojunkie:
1. A terribly flawed conclusion on your part! As to whether I have taken a stance or not regarding perfection, my stance means nothing since this ought to instead be about that which is written. According to the story, man, Adam, was not made perfect by God from His beginning. This goodness certification is a quality of the work done by the creator, and not a characteristic of the man himself.

2. If you would stick to what is written rather than these numerous attempts to redefine/redraw that which is written, you will find that it ain't as complicated as you think it is. God created all creatures, He breathed life —the breath of Life which is spirit and belongs to God — into every one of the living creatures that He created. There are no ambiguities in any of what is written as is written.

3. There you go insisting that it should all have been according to how you supposed. Adam was given a choice and made to know the consequence of disobeying said choice. Oh well!

4. In your confusion, you keep forgetting that evil was created by God Himself. You know what, You need to make up your mind whether you want to argue the delusions and musings of you or need to focus instead on seeing what is written as it is written.

This goodness certification is a quality of the work done by the creator, and not a characteristic of the man himself.

1. You're stretching this further and further. How did man got these characteristic if not from God's likeness. Its like making a robot and you'd expect it to just perform the task you built it for, without the necessary programmes and instructions it need to be fed with, to execute it. . Such creation is nothing more than a caricature!


If you would stick to what is written rather than these numerous attempts to redefine/redraw that which is written, you will find that it ain't as complicated as you think it is. God created all creatures, He breathed life —the breath of Life which is spirit and belongs to God — into every one of the living creatures that He created. There are no ambiguities in any of what is written as is written.

2. Since God breathed life into every living creatures. I am sure the the carnivorous animal we have today, initially started out vegans or how did they got the knowledge of killing other animals to help them survive. Or was it part of the plan too? Or was it humans fault, that made them share in the punishment too? Please explain this.



There you go insisting that it should all have been according to how you supposed. Adam was given a choice and made to know the consequence of disobeying said choice.

3. Maybe your error is you believing that I had wanted a perfect world, where everything would have worked out as plan. As if eating the supposed apple wasn't even part of the plan! since the consequence of eating the apple was stated, the it had to be part of the plan, else God would've made only the tree of good only, to save himself the stress of regret of making man. I said it earlier that the fact the tree of good and evil exist, then he should've had the premonition of what to expect. The flaw didn't just come spring up from "thin air", even though he saw it that it was good. This does not invalidate the possibilities of the probabilities of Adam going the opposite way of the "intended plan" . Stop looking at this from only one side of the coin. Adam was given a freewill within a constraint set of choices ffs! It's like the dilenma choosing between A and B, Of which it present in its enticing possibilities. Common. Man, do not make it look as if Adam deserved. Don't be God's jury here. You don't even know its intention, even though he said he regretted making man. Haven't we ever entertained the thought of going back to our childhood when the world then was without pressure and responsibilities, when we received the attentions and care, but the constraint is we have to grow. And by growing, we shoulder more responsibilities.




In your confusion, you keep forgetting that evil was created by God Himself. You know what, You need to make up your mind whether you want to argue the delusions and musings of you or need to focus instead on seeing what is written as it is written

4. If evil was created by God, what was the intention of him creating it, if he created a perfect world? Are you telling me the all knowing God do not know the probabilities of the outcomes of his own action!!!!! Tell me please. Make me understand. Even of he wanted to test Adam with the tree of good and evil, then he should still know what the outcome will be on both sides, which means God's creation was good in "making" but not entirely good in characteristics. And if this is still the case, God who created evil himself is capable of evil, because he can comprehend what evil is, even if he's not inclined to do so. It's like two side of a coin. Both are inseparable!!!!! So in essence God's creation can only be assumed to be good in aesthetics, and not in their characteristic; of each of his creation.

Emphasis on the word "Love". What is love? It is a deep and intense affection for something, usually people. And for an intense affection to be triggered, it must require your attention. Cos love Is all about attention for affection to take a foothold. So if you dedicate your attention for something material as money, either every other thing will take back seat value to you, or their as a means to an end. And this therein, is where rhe evil lie.

I do not believe them to be herdsmen, but rather armed robbers masquerading as herdsmen to give herdsmen a bad rap.

Kobojunkie:
1.

2. What fault slipped through? Where?

3. I think your confusion comes from you turning both on their heads as if to force the same meaning on both. God created Adam good so that Adam was fully able to choose between right and wrong, good and evil - choices. Adam was created by God fully capable of choosing to live according to the Perfect will of God, or not. Adam had no fault that would hinder him from making perfect choices if he were to have chosen exactly that for himself. The choices Adam eventually made have nothing to do with his creation since He was created and certified good by His creator.

If this is what you claim, then don't you think there's a mixup somewhere. Please think deeply about this thing. Mind you, what I seek is not to prove you wrong, nor do I have any need to validate my position being the right one. I am only imploring you to take a second look, and you you'll see perspective changes. Some of these words will pass of as authentic, until you think deeply to notice the ambiguities and conflicts in them.

This is what you said down here



Make certain you understand what is written abeg. God certified that man was created by Him to His exact specifications. Declaring the finished product GOOD means the product was created without fault from its beginning.

2. Goodness is a quality of being in conformance with God's specification and design, whereas holiness or perfection has instead to do with being in compliance with God's Law.




If God created man in his image, obviously then, man will be perfect or Isn't God not perfect? It means you've not really made a taken a stand if man Is perfect or not. You said specifications fine I agree, but where will you fit in the part where God said he made man in his image and likeness. Don't you think there's more to it? He breathed into man his spirit for man to be conscious and aware. How did you miss that part too? See brother, in your assertions, you've kind of blur the line between being good and being perfect, often times, since when I engaged you, you're kind of not sure what word to use, whether it's good or being perfect. And that's one of the ambiguities I am talking about.

If Adam was given an instruction to follow in the garden of Eden, the acclaimed first paradise that consists of tree of good and evil. Then there should be a premonition of both outcomes! He's omniscient ffs! He should know this, and if this is the case, then God's creation are likely not perfect. They may be good, and being good is not a cushion against going the wrong way. In the garden of Eden, there's the paradox of choices which cannot be resolved if one is to follow hkw its being described in the bible. And also, please ponder on this too. If God could make a tree of Good and evil in the bible, don't you think God can comprehend what evil is, and if he can do this, then God can have the tendencies to be evil, even if he's not inclined to do it. He might have created a supposed perfect place out of his "good heart" but it doesn't make the creation perfect in anyways, if there's a tree of evil in the garden!

Kobojunkie:
1. Make certain you understand what is written abeg. God certified that man was created by Him to His exact specifications. Declaring the finished product [b]GOOD means the product was created without fault from its beginning[/b].

2. Goodness is a quality of being in conformance with God's specification and design, whereas holiness or perfection has instead to do with being in compliance with God's Law.

I understand bro, just calm down. That in the bolded is where I will draw my next point of arguement. We all agree God is omnipresence right, and his(sic) presence permeates every existence, like everywhere right? And u said everything was without fault in the beginning (atleast in his eyes). How come this fault slipped through unnoticed into his creation, if he's the essence that permeates all existence? (I am sorry I used the word essence, since religion God has been genderlised . I take it back. I'll continue with the his henceforth, thank you.



Goodness is a quality of being in conformance with God's specification and design, whereas holiness or perfection has instead to do with being in compliance with God's Law. [/quote]

I am sorry bro, I might not agree with this, it almost like subtly equating being good to being perfect. It's like since God created me good, then I must be perfect by following his law. Dont you think that line there is even conflicting, since you even state earlier that Declaring the finished product [b]GOOD means the product was created without fault from its beginning[/b]. And come to think of it, there's no law without sin.