₦airaland Forum

saaphiere:
My case is different because I desire this kind of men in my life? Swear you won't wish same.

If I were a woman, I'd rather have me a man who would motivate me in every way possible to make wealth for myself. I'd rather have me a career and life builder, not one who would constantly stir up my insatiable desires. I'd desire a man who would challenge me to live an independent life and still love and build a happy home with him.

saaphiere:
Have you read that part she said she didn't ask for it? The guy chose to buy for her.

Isn't that the point I'm making here?

saaphiere:
In other words, Toke is lazy.

She didn't ask for it, and she seems like she could afford it without his assistance. Your case is different.

saaphiere:
Cry me a river. You all hate to see good things come to women.

No, I don't. I will spend on my woman when I have one, but I won't spoil her to the point where she becomes lazy and starts feeling entitled. That is exactly what you're exhibiting. You probably don't have a man in your life and you're already feeling entitled. Wo, wa pe m be! I have a strong repulsiveness for ladies with your mentality.

saaphiere:
Yes real men. A real man cares.

Just because a man spends on you doesn't necessarily mean that he cares for you. Use your head woman!

saaphiere:
What rubbish? Don't I have my preference ?

"These kind of men are the real men" . Massive shame on you!

saaphiere:
I need this kind of men in my life. God plsss. These kind of men are the real men.

What a mentality!

capitalzero:
When will ask people to do autopsy for suspicious death of their relatives, they will quickly rush to do burials citing religious and superstitious reasons.
The boy has been buried, no evidence he was beating to death. No video or picture of teacher beating him.
To know the truth, body must be exhumed for autopsy!!!!

Then why is the teacher on the run?

Jashub:
It is well. All the same, I wish her good luck in her search for a job.

Lol we don't even know if that chat is real in the first place, but this should be a lesson to all job seekers.

Jashub:
Baba, I am not giving excuses here ; I am only stating the loopholes the company failed to put in place in their recruitment excercise. How do I know? Because I am an employer too.

Every organization has their peculiar management system. This goes as far as recruitment exercises. In this case, I think there's nothing wrong with their method. Sometimes, you have to disguise to know who people really are.

The disguise here was necessary, because the employer himself had a firsthand experience of how she relates with people. If he had gone directly, she would have passed and it would take a while before her real attitude shows forth. Who knows how much damage she would do before that happens?

Jashub:
For a graphics job? I do not think so.

Business goes beyond skills. The way you relate with people is very important. You can't tell people to come kiss your feet just because you're a genius or you got some skills. People will always look at your attitude, and that will make them more comfortable doing businesses with you.

Jashub:
This is your OWN response. And not everyone will act the way you would under a given situation. Remember that

How can one respond that way when they haven't confirmed the intentions of the other person? What if the company decided to approach her that way to test her? You can't expect a test to always come directly. The girl is mean, and she fumbled, period! Stop giving excuses for her bad attitude.

2cribz:
So many tins don make ne wan commit suicide but i no fit,as long as i top up my ntn data,1 cliwnt must pay put. He is a stupid guy,im aure hez one of tbose fools that went to school to do fashion show and forgot himself fool. Theres notbing in naija uni to be proud of,do youe time,graj and fuc k out. No. Na big boy,big gal,off k life,i wan drive car,i wan go mall,see wetin end am he was def living above his means finish.

Look at his pictures if he looks like any of those things you mentioned. This comment reeks of absolute inhumanity. How can you be so judgemental about someone you know nothing about? May God keep me far away from people like you. Smh!

chuksoyo21:
The thrust of the teaching is to do good irrespective of what one identifies himself with.
Doing good and keeping right is the best religion one can ever practice.
In the said illustration of the Good Samaritan, a priest and levite walked passed and none helped out.
You don't have to be a Christian or Moslem time be kind to humanity.
Kindness and love for everyone supercedes all form of religion.

I already explained that in my comment. Love actually is the best religion, but have you forgotten that God Himself hates sin? If you claim to love your neighbour and do good to them, and sin against God, then you do not love Him. If you do not love Him, then what you feel for your neighbour is just something that looks like love, not love itself.

chuksoyo21:
"I believe that the true worship of God is in our right conducts and not in our religious association and buildings"[b][/b]

Dude is absolutely right on this.
A typical example is seen in the good Samaritan illustration in the Bible...
It was not stated by Jesus if the Samaritan was a Christian or not. Instead, it was established that he was a *Good Samaritan".
All you need do is to be good to man and nature.
Since God created man, there is a trace of God in us all way before religion came to be. And that's our conscience.....
Just be good and let the rest slide, I tell you, you will be doing God's will.

That was a parable, and the whole point of it was to teach us not to consider differences (religious, ethnic, tribal, etc. ) before we decide to help others. Jesus forms the basis of Christianity and He told us that He is THE way to the Father, not A way. So for us to be guaranteed a fulfilled life both here and in the afterlife, we have to follow Him. Following Him then makes these things relatively easy for us to do.

PigTormentor:
[s][/s]
RUBBISH TRASH.

Bitter soul.

sonmvayina:
We are waking up..even if it is one soul a day...we will get there. Everything they stole from us, they will return them..beginning with our spirituality..

So you despise Christianity because.. ?

Righteousness89:
The Persons who did this to their fellow Human are more Wicked and Evil than the one they Murdered!!

That's a proper definition of hypocrisy.

Dollywood:
Really? I'm bad at detecting errors. Please help me out.

Lol.

Nothing in this whole world can stop Lewandowski from winning this award.

NOT


Nothing in this whole world can stop Lewandowski from not winning this award.

Dollywood:
Nothing in this whole world can stop Lewandowski from not winning this award

You just indirectly said nothing in this world can make Lewandowski win it. Read your statement again and spot the error.

ILoveDemMANNA:
Oh boy!
Once upon a time invisible club in the whole wide world. CHANGE : The only constant thing in life!

Invincible.

LordReed:
You said nothing of the sort, maybe you should go back and read what you wrote.

How is that a good way to know what to believe? You'll believe any explanation you are given until you get a different explanation? So how do you tell the difference between explanations?

I thought I said something of that sort, my bad.

It's easy for me to believe because I already believe in the spiritual. However, that doesn't mean I should believe everything I hear or read. I could easily refute the claims, but on what basis if the story is true? The questions I asked favour my belief. Except there's a logical explanation to demystify that, you can't expect me to believe otherwise.

LordReed:
I asked questions, you replied with questions and are now saying I should answer your questions first?

I said that the possibilities you stated cannot be ruled out, but then again, you seem to have concluded that those are the only possible causes when there's no evidence for that. Now, in the absence of an evidence to those possible causes, I have to believe in the claim. So how do you expect me to believe otherwise if you can't answer my questions?

LordReed:
I didn't refute any claim, I asked you questions. You want me to accept your explanation for these occurrences but you are not willing to answer simple questions? It doesn't work that way. Answer the questions, may be your explanation will hold up or may be it won't.

I recall I asked you three questions from my first post which you blatantly ignored, stating that you have nothing to explain. Those questions form the basis for what I believe in this case. If you can't answer my questions, why should I answer yours?

LordReed:
It's not for me to explain anything, you are attributing things to gods and I am asking you how you eliminated these other likely causes. A man said he invoked a god and that's all you know?

If you refute a claim, you should make sure that that claim doesn't make sense before you make your point. While those causes are possible, the question is why they had to happen when those activities were carried out. What if someone (not necessarily the one who summoned the god) actually poisoned the victim, the question is why did it happen when the god was summoned? There are many phenomena that science can't explain till date, yet you believe them. Just because there's no scientific evidence for this one, you decided to refute it at first thought.

LordReed:
How did you rule out the vagaries of natural circumstances or the wilful acts of man either to introduce disease vectors or poisons to the so called victims?

How do you explain the tree getting dried up within ONE WEEK after the stone was removed from it? Why didn't that vagary occur before then or long after? What are the chances of releasing disease vectors or poisons to the victim after claiming that he summoned a deity?

mamagee3:
[color=deeppink]I was known as female Einstein back in school...Why was that?[/color]

Albert Einstein was a question freak. With the way you ask questions here, it's easy to guess that you were like that in school, hence the moniker. However, Einstein's questions were extremely thought provoking, yours on the other hand are quite needless and easy to figure out.

womenareapes:
simp!

go complement your mother and not that one who's lip look like her anus

You expect me to take you seriously with that username?

lkillbrokehoes:
Simp forever!

Sorry, but I don't live in your world of toxic masculinity. I respect women, and if you think complimenting them is a function of being a simp, then there's a problem somewhere.

Pierocash:
even though I quite understand your point. But bro, sometimes it doesn't work that way. Nobody rejects courtesy, kindness, and neatness. Most of the ugly men I know all have very beautiful women in their lives.

Therefore cast not away your confidence, which has great recompense of reward

I understand you too bro. That's why I said "very few" in my previous post. Being polite/not shouldn't be an effect of how people treat you, it should flow out naturally. However, it can seem difficult to make the first move when you're an introvert lol.

Chii59:
Yawns. Day don break

Heyy! I just want to say you look pretty, and those glasses look damn good on you.

Pierocash:
If you are handsome,meeting them won't be a hard nut to crack.

I am an introvert,but believe me ,I don't struggle to get one whenever I need. Friendship, politeness,and hospitality has been my strongest technique. Believe me,it doesn't fail

If you were not handsome, very few would care to pay attention to the other qualities. Being unattractive and introverted is a tough place to be.