₦airaland Forum

uboma:
My boy is ready. Seen him several times trying to mount some bitches (not on heat).

As long as the bitch is on heat, leave the rest to my boy, he knows what to do.

I've also seen male dogs of 5 months mount female dogs that are not on heat, will you say that the dog is ready because of that?

I think you should allow your dog mature first, at 10 months it's basically still a puppy.
it's like letting your 14-15 year old son start messing around with women because he has started showing interest in women

at maturity the mating process will be easier and the female will be more willing to mate with him and also he'll be more sexually productive than he is now which means the chances of pregnancy and large litter size has a better chance.

your dog is really nice btw

decatalyst:
No be as e dey do e go dey get experience ni?

At what month is right?

it's not only about experience, the correct age to mate a dog should be from 15 months.
at 10 months the dog is still a puppy

amehrada:
I have to agree with IamAnderson because I also feel that there's is no way a good guard dog won't exhibit some form of aggression(Territorial or protective aggression) when an intruder invades their territory, isn't that what they were bred for?

Proper obedience training and socialisation is key to controlling such aggression. Same thing Anderson has been yarning since.

I personally think territorial and protective aggression are both good aggression in dogs while certain others like fear aggression, possessive aggression and predatory aggression are not good and it's because of these kinds of aggression that aggression in dogs is generally thought to be a behavioural problem.

There is need to understand the different types of aggression and not just aggression in general.

exactly my point
they will say it's "high nerve strength" which means high instinct and drive but when you ask them high instinct to do what?
high drive to do what?
then they start rambling again

I don't know why it's so hard to call it what it is, when you've already convinced yourself that a word is all negative you'll start trying to change the meaning of words and straying away from the point when you can't avoid using the word.

they will also say barking, growling and snarling isn't aggression but "kennel frustration"
even though it's clearly there in the list of signs of aggression in dogs that they themselves sent.

and people don't want to understand that even a well balanced guard dog has to be aggressive when it's needed.
that is why some breeds are chosen to guard over the others.
a greyhound is a more agile dog than a gsd but it lacks territorial aggression or protective aggression which disqualifies it from being a guard dog or attack dog.

a Newfoundland dog can be trained to be a guardian and company for children and they can form strong emotional bonds with people but they lack territorial or protective aggression which is why even with their massive size and powerful jaws they are not chosen as guard dogs instead the Caucasian Shepherd is chosen even as they are harder to train and less obedient.
these dogs can work under extreme pressure and not crack, they are used to find corpses, find drugs, swim and retrieve things, work as professional race dogs, they are used as seeing eye dogs, show dogs e.t.c
why then are they used for all those jobs except guarding?
will you say they don't have "high nerve strength"?
they lack one factor which is territorial or protective aggression
no matter how you want to sugarcoat it, it's the truth
a dog cannot be a guard dog or attack dog without having this trait, which is why some breeds are picked over others, you can say it's " obeying orders" but you cannot train a dog without territorial or protective aggression to guard your property or protect you no matter how obedient it is.
which is why even as the labrador, golden retriever and great dane are easier to train and easier to work with than a Caucasian Shepherd, the Caucasian Shepherd is still chosen as a guard dog over these breeds.
these dogs can be trained to do a multitude of other things better than some guard breeds except guarding or protecting because of the trait they lack

okayman4real:
Some one told to cross my female gsd with Caucasian too. But I dont know if is going look good also.

what reason did the person give you?

amizzy48:
A friend of mine cross his female Gsd with a male Caucasian and the female Gsd is already pregnant. I want to see picture how the puppies are goin to look like after delivery . Though am still considering crossing my female Gsd with a Caucasian.
Pls anyone who have this combo should upload the picture( adult or puppy)

when you cross breed dogs the results are unpredictable, both how the dog will look physically and the temperament.

even if you see a pic of a gsd/Caucasian yours mights not come out like that.
also you should consider some things if you're bent on cross breeding your dog, a Caucasian is far bigger than a gsd, the puppy size is definitely not going to be the same thing too.

if the Caucasian is from a huge blood line do you think it's wise to let your gsd carry the pups?.
do you know that she can die during childbirth or have complications because of the size of the puppies?

here's an example, a liger is a cross between a lion and a tiger, they only use a male lion and a female tiger and never the other way around because a female lion cannot carry a cub that big to term easily unlike the female tiger that is used to carrying big cubs due to their larger size.

if you want to cross breed your dog, be careful with the dog you mix it with and also have it in mind that the puppies might come out bad or good, it's just based on chance.

Dreazy23:
That would be one big bowl

yeah he eats in a basin lol

Dreazy23:
How many times do you feed Roscoe?
I still feed Rex thrice a day cause of the way he eats

Roscoe eats once a day now

try rice with mear or fish and supplement with multivitamins

or noodles with meat or fish and multivitamins

or garri and draw soup with meat or fish

Spanishmilf:
I'm alao getting a Caucasian i heard they eat alot

like mad
one day I'll snap Roscoe's food and show you guys.

Dreazy23:
It's actually working although he injured me by mistake now he just growls but when I collect it he just looks like please na

But he still attacks bailey if she comes close when he's eating Meat

that's good
just keep on doing it and he'll learn, don't stop until you have total control over his behavior around food, still continue again when he's grown and more mature
I don't think you should let Bailey disturb him while he's eating tho, he might harm her.
try to chain them apart during feeding time.

oh and how's Bailey acting now? have you started training her to calm her down?

phunkypalace:
and yes you referring to yourself as a "dogman" is funny, it sounds like you're part of that small percentage of Nigerians that feel like them knowing about dogs makes them better or smarter than other people so they join every social media platform to talk to the 5% of the population that is interested in "dog social media" like they are bosses or superior. smiley

the real people that are actually knowledgeable and important in the dog community don't bother themselves in social media antics, rather you hear their names and their work and dogs speak for them, it's always people like you that are in every group and forum creating threads


I thought this was going to end well in a more respectable manner but I see trying to impart knowledge and trying to answer that your question is now a sin. Don't worry I won't create threads and won't bother going into social media antics. This is the major reason why some of them don't talk, people like you throw out bants. Keep it up, there is a reward for everybody.

I'm a linguist and I just read PDF files...very funny. If and when I see a more open approach without bants, I'll answer your question.

you said a lot of things without my answers, if you really had answers to my questions you would have said them before typing long paragraphs for over 24 hours

I'll address you when you have my answers

Ozonexy:
@IamAnderson...am sure you will be afraid of dogs when you meet a strong-willed,apparently knows only its owner and is ready to give any stranger a smack-down...My warning dnt form James Bond with unfamiliar dogs...i came across one stud ..the owner is on nairaland here MESSI (ROTTWEILER) ...has no mercy...ready to attack moving cars...
I'll advice you respect is reciprocal...

lmao it's a Rottweiler nah I won't try that with a Rottweiler.
that's why I said any dog smaller than a German Shepherd and is not physically stronger or heavier than me.
if I see a dog that can take me down I approach with caution

phunkypalace:
"we do not believe in violence yet we are an organization that teaches dogs how to attack on command" you see how that statement doesn't make sense right?

This above is your self coined phrase and as such does not apply to the rudiments of the Schutzhund training, you are only twisting up everything just to suit your narrative and yes it doesn't make any sense.

Secondly you stated that the steps in the schutzhund training means violence but the last time I checked there are three steps which are:

Tracking

Obedience

Protection.

if you checked the screenshot I sent you'll see I only took a screenshot of the protection step because that's the part I was trying to talk about, you listing the other steps has literally nothing to add or take away from what I said earlier.
you are teaching the dogs in the protection stage of the training to attack to defend their handlers and you cannot say attacking is not a form of violence yet you say you do not train dogs how to be violent does that add up to you?
which is why I listed the signs of aggression in dogs and asked you to tell us how a guard dog does it's work without using any of the signs since you said you use dogs without any form of aggression. you are still yet to answer that question.
I also asked you why a Newfoundland dog cannot go through training to be a guard dog but can go through training to be an emotional crutch dog, what does it lack that differentiates it from other popular guard breeds, since you said the dogs are just obeying orders and they have no form of aggression why can't the Newfoundland dog obey orders to attack but can obey orders to accompany little kids and stay by their side? what attribute does it lack? what is the attribute that all the other guard breeds have in common? since you said aggression isn't needed at all, tell us what the attribute is?.
You still haven't answered that too instead you're bringing up random topics from shutzund training that has nothing to do with what I asked.

see I noticed you've been acting like I'm just a random person that has no prior knowledge of the topic and you're the one with the wider platform to talk
imagine you telling me I need to understand the science? lmao
do I need to remind you that you're a linguist that read PDF files and joined a club?
I'm not the kind of person that brags or uses degrees in arguments because I find it very immature and riddled with insecurities, but let me just tell you that if we want to go that way, you talking to me about genetics or science is going to look like a big joke.

don't reply me again with another long comment filled with unnecessary paragraphs I have to delete before replying you except you're answering the questions I asked.
I'm not going to repeat myself another time, it's not my fault it's hard for you to read and understand what someone is trying to say.

answer the questions I asked or stop hitting everywhere except the head of the nail.

and yes you referring to yourself as a "dogman" is funny, it sounds like you're part of that small percentage of Nigerians that feel like them knowing about dogs makes them better or smarter than other people so they join every social media platform to talk to the 5% of the population that is interested in "dog social media" like they are bosses or superior.

the real people that are actually knowledgeable and important in the dog community don't bother themselves in social media antics, rather you hear their names and their work and dogs speak for them, it's always people like you that are in every group and forum creating threads

Dreazy23:
So I have brought this up one time but still experiencing the same issue, Rex is Meat Agressive

Once you've handed meat to him he doesn't know anyone again....i thought it's something that he will grow out of but he's far from that.

Basically I can get bitten by Rex if I disturb his meat time but he's cool with food, I can put my hands in his mouth when he's eating his food and nothing but once it's meat it's totally different.

Tips on how to curb this? cause it's Dangerous for the new pup who like disturbing him and also for me

try to stop simply handing the meat to him
hold the meat and let him sit or lay down before you give him, also when you give him let him eat it while you hold it, if he tries to take it away or growl at you then take it and walk away.
with time he'll understand he has to be well mannered or no treats, he's just acting like that because he really loves meat and he's testing your boundaries.
I did this and it worked, now if my dog wants the meat in my hand he'll sit and wait for me to hand it to him before he takes it slowly and runs away with it to eat it were no one will disturb him .
it's like you're scared of Rex
don't let him see that, his testing is just beginning, if you don't assume the alpha role he'll only come harder for you when he's older.
sometimes when he sets boundaries, break them and you'll see he's just testing how much power you have over him.
when my dog went through this faze I used to ignore his grolws and remove whatever I wanted to remove from his mouth no matter how much he growled or snarled at me.
it got easier later on, right now he allows me touch any part of his body anyhow I want, I also have free access to his mouth which helps me a lot during grooming or brushing

phunkypalace:
We do not believe in violence hence the reason you would never find it in the shutzhund training manual, it goes as high as letting you know that dogs in the schutzhund training for thr BH title are also thrown out if they show any form of aggression...so please...change your narrative.

You've been screaming embarrassed..embarrassed..embarrassed. I can't be embarrassed with this, this is nothing compared to my achievements in the German Shepherd world. I have world class stocks and some of my puppies are doing well in their various homes, some are in Ghana too, my works and my dogs speak for me. As a matter of fact I can't count how many chats and calls I receive from people who want to learn new things on daily basis. BTW, I am not trying to win you in anyway, you are clearly not the type I can compete with, you don't have the balls so trying to win you is a complete waste of time.

What am I doing?....I am trying to help other members who are reading this thread in other for them not to be misinformed. Folks like you are on the rampage on NL and I won't stop the good work by preaching against foolish assumptions and misconceptions that you preach out there because once you own a single dog, you think you know virtually everything.

I won't answer you again because you want the world to think this is a competition and your use of innuendos and indirect insults is totally out of it, to me it isn't, when you give false informations, other people who are willing to learn are clearly seeing my posts and they'll pick one or two things from it.

You own a Caucasian, go and meet the likes of Bsquared In Jos, talk to Tox, Divine In Anambra, talk to Embo and Cephas in Kaduna..let them put you things you think you know but you don't.

English definition is not it in the dog world okay?....you're novice today, but you can actually come out of it tomorrow if you're willing to learn.

I wish you all the best.

"we do not believe in violence yet we are an organization that teaches dogs how to attack on command" you see how that statement doesn't make sense right?

and now you've listed all your accomplishments no one asked for and you still didn't answer the question I asked you in my previous comment.
you see were the problem is?, you felt you could actually make a point but when you found out you couldn't your insecurity jumped out and you've been name dropping and talking about courses you've allegedly studied in dog training
I don't have the balls and winning me is a complete waste of time yet guess who spent over 15hrs arguing with me?

and I've seen you've been trying to bring in the fact that I don't have multiple pedigree dogs to try to discredit me
it's always like that with some vets,trainers or breeders when they feel cornered or threatened, "I have multiple pedigree dogs so I'm experienced' has to be one of the most stupid beliefs ever.
I've seen people that have pedigree dogs and still don't know what to do, they still go around asking for advice.
it's people like you that feel like a dog owner having a non pedigree dog is such a big deal when even the people you struggle to download their PDF files in their country most dog owners own mutts or non pedigree dogs.
but because you have learned the meaning of pedigree you now go around throwing it like it's an added laurel to your head, pleeaassse.
and why would I start travelling around to meet popular Caucasian breeders because I own a Caucasian?
does that really make sense to you or is it just more name dropping?
do you think it's every dog owner that is interested in getting these laurels that have no value in the real world like you?
lmao some people just love dogs and want to keep them, you reading PDF files or joining any organization that anyone can join if they choose to doesn't make you better than them so just slow down and think.

you've called me a novice several times yet I'm still waiting for you to type one ground breaking comment that'll prove me to be a fool

throwing titles and names around doesn't mean you've made a point, I see that has been your mode of operation for some time now.


when you're ready to get off that wooden horse you think you're riding into the sunset you can answer the question I asked you in my previous comment, otherwise goodbye Mr "dogman'
lmao .

phunkypalace:
Lol...my point is you literally have no idea of shutzhund training. Schutzhund training is not everywhere oga, that I am very sure of, it is only done in a country...the others you see are copy cats. Stop trying Mr man, the word aggression means wild and uncontrollable in the dog world especially in the working German Shepherd Dog.

You can keep on trying but on this Schutzhund training is literally not backing you in anyway. Do you even have the idea of the first step to be taken before we check the dog's temperament, you can't know except you look up google and get informations.

The likes of Grandiose German Shepherds in the person of Major General Ahmed Mohammed have been to these shows, he has taken his time to teach us how it is being done through videos and PDF files, so you can't know beyond what you know. We know what the Schutzhund training is, in our world a dog with courage and any form of enthusiasm, being confident is never an aggressive dog and in fact it is an embodiment of every German Shepherd Dog.


You've been screaming violence and every other term you deemed it fit to use, but you can't see any of those words in the Schutzhund training.

What you don't know is above you oga. If you like continue your narrative, according to the normal standard of the SV Schutzhund training, a dog with any form of aggression can never make SCHH1 let alone SCHH3.

And BTW, what else do you know that is being done in a Schutzhund training?...go and marry your google ooo. Like rumenase will say, NA DEM

first of all, when I said shutzund training is everywhere I obviously meant online because I'm sure as hell you didn't go to Germany to learn it, you sat in Nigeria and downloaded PDF files.
and secondly the steps in the shutzund training literally meant violence, violence is not a term used in dog training but several words are used to describe violence.
thirdly, knowing about the terms and steps in shutzund training didn't help you win a "nairaland novice with only one dog" so you should be embarrassed.
fourthly, I thank god that I am not a man insulting people for googling facts and going toe to toe In an argument that lasted for hours with him and his bitch even though his only certification for the topic he pats himself on the back so much for is a collection of PDF files he downloaded.
fiftly, let me leave you with this, since you said a dog cannot be a good guard dog without any form of aggression then tell me how the good guard dogs you've seen or trained do their jobs without any sign of aggression

phunkypalace:
That a dog must be, alert, confident, watchful nd courageous is never the same thing with your own aggression that you've been shouting since ages. The dogs are never required to have any form of aggression, the first thing we check before a German Shepherd can suit into the working field is the temperament which consists of the basic things I've listed already. On this one you better just sit with your Roscoe or you learn gently. What do they mean by inappropriate aggression, and why didn't it state that a normal or balanced aggression is needed?

So having courage and being enthusiastic means violence?....somebody should wake me up because someone is spitting out total bullshit.

okay the dog should be alert,watchful and also confident and courageous to do what exactly?
what does the dog need all those qualities for? is it not to be able to get up to attack or engage threats?
how does a dog engage threats? isn't it through biting? is biting not a form of violence??

and what type of aggression have I been shouting since? haven't I been saying some breeds of dogs naturally have aggressive traits but it doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing because aggression can be bad and also good?
didn't I say aggression doesn't mean recklessness? didn't I say you can train a dog to channel it's natural aggression into useful tasks? (e.g protection and guarding)

what should the dog have courage and should be enthusiastic about? isn't it engaging a threat? isn't engaging a threat violence??

them saying a dog has to be courageous and willing to attack the threat already means the dog has to be ready to be aggressive when the handler orders, which is why inappropriate aggression is not a good character and dogs that show it are disqualified.

and the pic you attached is obviously talking about inappropriate aggression, I don't know why it's so hard to understand it aren't you supposed to be a linguist??

how do you want to teach a dog how to defend it's handler and attack on command and expect it not to have any form of aggression??
what do you expect the dog to do? smile and ask the threat to calmy back off?

even the most well trained attack dogs bite and growl which is a form of aggression.
the problem here is that the word aggression means wild and uncontrollable to you which is wrong.

there are some dog breeds were lack of aggression is states as a fault sef , they are supposed to have natural aggression which can be trained and channelled into performing a particular task(guarding or attacking)

tell us if you've ever seen a guard dog that doesn't bite or bark and tell us how the dog does it's work without violence or violent tendencies.

and shutzund training is not a new thing, it's literally everywhere, you can learn all the steps if you want I don't know why you feel it's such a complicated thing people won't know or get.

and why are you talking as if I'm mentioning shutzund training because you said it?
you're trying to use shutzund training to disprove me and I'm showing you that the shutzund training still backs what I'm saying up.
what's your point??

Endy10:
Exactly.
I was waiting for someone else to bring up this point.
The reason for this thread is for people to learn. I know a lot of people are, even if few would take a little longer to learn because of years of wrong information.

this is how dogs that go through the protective shutzund training are trained, you can clearly read that the dog must have courage or be enthusiastic to engage the helper in a struggle which means violence right?
you can also see where it clearly states that any dog with INAPPROPRIATE aggression will be dismissed which also means the dogs are required to have aggression but they are required to be controllable which means a dog cannot undergo shutzund training without being willing to switch to aggression.
you understand me now?

vincentjk:
Get a boerboel. They're calm giants, with good tempermant and if raised well would transform their aggression into territorial instincts and most of all their looks and barks are very intimidating

This is the grandfather to my dog (from the maternal side)

wow he looks amazing

phunkypalace:
What I showed you in the pictures are dogs obeying and complying to an instruction but how are you going to understand if you have no basic knowledge of what is being done in the pictures...SMH

also since the dogs are just following orders then tell us why you cannot train a Newfoundland dog to be a guard dog or attack dog and why you can train a Rottweiler to do both.
tell me the qualities the Newfoundland dog lacks that makes it a guardian and emotional company dog and not a guard dog.

the quality is willingness to be aggressive at any point, a Newfoundland is not aggressive in any way even though its obedient and trainable which is why it cannot even perform those tasks. a Rottweiler is a naturally aggressive dog which is why it can be trained to be aggressive towards intruders or threats.

phunkypalace:
Did you read this at all?


Aggression is the most common and most serious behavior problem in dogs. It’s also the number-one reason why pet parents seek professional help from behaviorists, trainers and veterinarians.


You claim it is normal in dogs and I am telling you it is a problem, at least there is a reason why the article called it a problem a behavioral problem at that in which I kept on ringing in your ears but you think it's normal.

So to let you know if your dog shows any form of aggression, you have a big problem.

And BTW, where did I call forms of aggression work quality?....It's not even up to 12 hrs yet and you think you can lie against me?...funny

There is a difference between a dog with a good guard instinct and a dog with aggression. Aggression in dogs is willingness to attack without any provocation which is very abnormal.

What I showed you in the pictures are dogs obeying and complying to an instruction but how are you going to understand if you have no basic knowledge of what is being done in the pictures...SMH

first of all that statement wasn't made about guard dogs, they were referring to abnormal aggression.
the article even said the different forms of aggression and listed territorial aggression which is when a dog shows signs of aggression towards intruders which is basically what every guard dog does.

so if your dog growls or bites it's a big problem? have you ever seen a well trained military dog that doesn't growl or bite??

and you weren't the one that said that it was the OP, I mixed you people up, that was shortly before you joined the thread.

and aggression isn't the willingness to attack without any provocation, the article clearly listed things that show when a dog has different forms of aggression
e.g
when you enter the territory of a dog with territorial aggression it'll attack, is that unprovoked??
when you mess with the food of a dog with food aggression it'll attack, is that unprovoked??
and the dogs obeying the instructions are they not biting or growling?
aren't those signs of aggression??
were they laughing?
didn't I say you can channel a dog's aggressive behavior into productive things and how aggressive behavior doesn't mean uncontrollable and how dogs with aggressive behavior can be trained well and also be obedient??

didn't I say aggression doesn't always mean reckless and overly done?
didn't I say even a bark or bite is a sign of aggression?

phunkypalace:
Well I don't think you have any idea of what the videos would be made up of and if you can truly understand what is being done. You saw what the article was trying to point out right?...Dogs in that category will never make a working dog. If you wanna know how that is possible, you ask and stop proving your English based definition of aggression crowns it all.

the article was talking about dogs that are overly aggressive, it was very obvious and I had also said that when a dog is overly aggressive it's a problem.

then the article said the different signs of aggression and dogs that are well trained military dogs still show some of those aggressive signs.
I also said how people use the term "aggressive dog" to describe dogs that are overly aggressive and how technically even the most well trained military dogs show signs of aggression and how a dog cannot be a guard dog without showing signs of aggression which you still haven't been able to prove me wrong instead your articles even support the points I said earlier that you choose not to understand

phunkypalace:
You claim to be far above, so there should actually be some basic fact to support your claim.

If you are truly above and know your onions, you will clearly understand what I mean by that question.

If you are less interested in banters, maybe we could have a meaningful conversation, I'm not even sure that can happen.

Oh and again you didn't say anything to the first paragraph...lol

in my thread I clearly stated that I basically rescued a pup from the kennel were it was kept with other dogs that were bullying it without even asking to see his parents, the only thing I got was his date of birth.
so tell me how the way he was bred has anything point to prove when I have already clearly stated how I had no idea of his filial generation??

phunkypalace:
Endy10 please kindly use the following links to back up your claims about Aggression in Dogs.

Would have love to create a new thread entirely but I just want you to stand firm on what you have shared with us and to respect the fact that you started this interesting topic.

In the future do not let anyone bamboozle you on mere say and assumptions. At first I thought he was willing to learn but immediately I saw him make the very first three contributions, I knew I was dealing with a retard.

https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/aggression

https://www.thesprucepets.com/dogs-and-aggression-1118229

Any other interested person(s) can also learn and stop arguing with science especially when the aggression in your dog is as a result of a genetic disorder.

If anyone wants to know how the pictures I posted in this thread really looks like and how it works when the dogs are in the working field please send a message. It's a pity videos can't be uploaded on NL.

notice how the articles you posted listed things that are signs of aggression in dogs, things I said were signs of aggression that you called 'work quality"?
remember when I said aggression can also be a behavioral problem when it is uncontrollable or too much like what was said in the article?

did you read in the article when it stated that some specific breeds are naturally aggressive but the aggression can be reduced or removed depending on what the owner wants?
didn't you see when it stated that territorial aggression is when the dog shows aggression towards intruders in it's territory? so tell me how you can have a guard dog without aggression and how it can defend it's territory without doing any of the things listed there as signs of aggression?.
i don't know why understanding is so hard for you, what I said earlier about aggression is still what's in the article, you're just bent to believing what you've already made up in your mind.

okay

phunkypalace:
In the future do not let anyone bamboozle you on mere say and assumptions. At first I thought he was willing to learn but immediately I saw him make the very first three contributions, I knew I was dealing with a retard.

https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/aggression

https://www.thesprucepets.com/dogs-and-aggression-1118229

Any other interested person(s) can also learn and stop arguing with science especially when the aggression in your dog is as a result of a genetic disorder.

If anyone wants to know how the pictures I posted in this thread really looks like and how it works when the dogs are in the working field please send a message. It's a pity videos can't be uploaded on NL.

lmao so I'm a r£tard and you're a scientist now?
the jokes write themselves

and you can post videos of dogs being trained all you want, it still doesn't disprove what I said.
after everything I said all you have to say is that you have videos of dogs being trained

phunkypalace:
It's a good thing to fantasize, say things on paper but it's a different ball game if you've really been put to test and experience the real deal. With that, the gap and difference between me and you is a no go area. Remind me how your Roscoe was bred again..

what does how my dog was bred have to do with the topic?
if you actually read my thread you'll see I clearly stated how I got him

Chuma93:
Crossed her last on 4th Dec does she look pregnant

....that's a male dog

phunkypalace:
What you don't know is above you. Have a good night rest jooor.

imagine how far high I am above you if this statement were true. goodnight

phunkypalace:
You can revert to insults and question my linguistic certificate. Keep it up.

mehn you're not making any sense again, I'm actually getting bored to sleep.
I've said all I wanted to say about the topic, you can keep the meaningless rants to tend to your insecurity and embarrassment

phunkypalace:
Lol..... ;DIt's good to push what you feel on people okay?..and think they feel the same way too.

On you area of aggression or whatever it is you call it, when you pick up a course with ICB, you'll know more okay? Stick with your dictionary meaning and keep arguing against science.

since when did things random men that call themselves dog men come up with become science?

phunkypalace:
Not making any point, I don't need it. I'm just exposing the fact that you're clueless.

The dogs you were bragging about knowing their history all of a sudden becomes random online dogs, you really need to dig deeper next time.

I'll say it again, what you don't know is above you.

the only thing you've proved here is that your linguist certificate needs to be questioned.
when did I say I knew about their history?
didn't I also explain how they were random online dogs because I can't reach their owners and I haven't had any encounter with them?

you're not making any sense bruh

phunkypalace:
I don't pray you learn anything from me. If your teachers are here, there are two ways to it. Either all of you are in the same bandwagon or you literally just choose to be behind.

pleeease I've had more intelligent conversations with 16 year olds

your self flatter is funny, you really think you're all that huh?
you've spent hours arguing something and not being able to back it up, then switching to a totally different topic and still loosing,then asking for unreasonable things as proof when that didn't work you switched to basic insults and self praise

all that screams hurt,insecure and embarrassed