₦airaland Forum

Bombblacks:
The price won't be different. If he can ask that amount from common Vila then he will even be demanding more from a bigger club.

When you want to leave an employer, you may make a ridiculous demand as the price for keeping you. Make we see the salary when it come out. And that boy is a first team squad player anyway, and £50k to £100k is what we pay them at Chelsea

Bombblacks:
Which one is cry more again do I look like a Barca fan. I read report previously he was asking for 100k per week at 18 which pushed various clubs away.

£100k is what he asked Villa.

For a big club he wants to go to, the price will be different. Let's see his salary when it comes out.

Bombblacks:
Various clubs stayed far away from him due to his wage demands. Una don fall maga

Cry more

lordfalcao:
heard he is talented

He is

We've signed Carney Chukwuemeka

Boehly is the man!

WhodeyHause food done done. Barca were chasing him ferociously

drisham:
How far egbon are you creating an fpl league this season??

It's top thread on this section

benalvino3:
Are they part of the revolution? Yes? Then they are the Arab spring as well.

They are not part of any revolution. They are all facing their own revolution at home and trying to quell it. It is only Ghaddaffi matter that they chook mouth. Imagine neighbours Egypt and Tunisia fighting against people's uprising and regime change at home, yet calling for regime change on Ghaddaffi and recognising the rebels as the legitimate Govt of Libya. Probably even allowing the rebels to rest and resupply if Ghaddaffi chase them across the border.

Finally proof of Segedinho and Airmark JuJu. Raumdeuter come and see



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDG6Qsccsoo

benalvino3:
The Arab spring is the revolution which include the Arab league and the western states backing them.

The Arab Spring is a revolution. The Arab League is an Association like African Union. You don't even know the basics.

The Arab League was against the Arab Spring because their Govts were threatened by the people uprising. Ghaddaffi was the only leader in the Arab world that the Arab League encouraged Arab Spring against, and even recognised the rebels as the legitimate Govt of Libya to show you Ghaddafi cup done full. Arab Spring is anathema to the rulers. You say Arab Spring included Arab League. Mumu

I never argued with you whether Libya intervention was right or wrong. I told you it was INEVITABLE when you have all Arab countries and America's key allies calling for his removal, and a West incentivised by terror attacks on its civilians by the same Ghaddaffi to heed their wish. There is no American president living or dead that would not treat Ghaddaffi at the behest of his Arab and NATO allies, with UN backing, and his people and all security agencies happy to see payback for Lockerbie.

Keep ranting what nobody sent you.

popizaino:
Father lord forgive me for ever thinking Kante was close to this guy. The coach that sold this guy from real Madrid must be a fuckin racist.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGJIb-io6ac

Best DM of my lifetime

benalvino3:
Arab spring set aside and puppet to replace Gadaffi the following day Nato enforce No fly zone. Again, The Arab spring cannot call and approve a No fly zone, the UN approved it. all that is a distraction just to let people think The US and France and England is not behind everything.
again, Look at Syria and reflect on what happened to Libya. They always use uprising. Look at Ukraine, and they tried with Iran as well. the pattern is there for you to see. the moment they have the means to smuggle weapons into that country the moment the country will burn.

The No-Fly zone they enforced, how is it that they were attacking ground troops and positions as well? What kind of no-fly zone is that? How is immediate Ceasefire only apply to Libya's army and not the Rebels they armed?

Who is the Arab Spring? You mean the Arab League?

All your off-topic rant all over the place, addressing topics nobody is arguing with you will not move a fly. You have started an anti-West diatribe over what the Arab League requested be done to their brother. When you finish, go and read about Qatar funding and stoking that whole rebel movement from inception, before you absolve the Arabs and blame only the West again like a typical Putard.

The West was only too happy to oblige their request and treat Ghaddaffi fückup finally. Westerners know, as a Westerner told you in the bolded below. You can only rant from far.

raumdeuter:
The post 9-11 climate made anxiety about "WMD in the hands of AlQaeda" seem legit, Ghadaffi had bombed Lockerbie way back in 1988, and has been openly anti West. It was just a little excuse of Arab Spring that was used to treat his agelong fvckup. There was nothing Ghadaffi was doing in 2010 that he was not doing for the past 40yrs, I will even argue that he had calmed down his anti west stance in 2010 vs earlier years

Ihebu4chelsea:
Chief Gooday.

Bros I have replied your email so communicate by email and delete the above

donstan18:
Is he that versatile?

He is capable of it but not better than Puli or Sterling on the wings

donstan18:
Nobody is even saying he isn’t good, but talking down on Chillwell who isn’t a flop because of Crocodile is annoying and embarrassing.

Chillwell of Leicester >> Crocodile
Chillwell of Chelsea >> Crocodile
UCL winning Chillwell >> Crocodile

Kukuruku might shock you and play LW like he did at Getafe

benalvino3:
It's not propaganda, it's a Voltron excuse you are throwing out here. We all know what happens to Nations like Libya with oil. Like i said, Syria shows a pattern but you can't see it. You are closed-minded. its Lockerbie

My own is based on knowing what happened and how the West thinks and reported Ghaddaffis death in relation to Lockerbie. I know very well that a state-sponsored terror attack on USA citizens will always be remembered and paid in kind somewhere down the line, and I know that the Arab League are who pushed the no fly zone through the UN. These are facts. Your own is based on foolishness and the same old lazy conspiracy theorists first refrain on blaming everything on money and who got the oil. So Italy bombed Ghaddaffi to help French companies win contracts that belonged to Italian companies? Your mumu never do?

Koulibaly calling Terry to request the 26 shirt


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSuaob3QBYM

Donstan done provoke

benalvino3:
You are making excuses for that saint Obama with a lie. Everything i said is responding to your argument.
you never told me how America works, you just spread the propaganda they fed to you.
I am not waiting for bush because I know why he invaded Iraq. I know how Saudis were against it, telling them the threat is the Iranians.
trust me, His father has nothing to do with it. another useless nonsense you believe in.

Lockerbie is not one, Never part of it. keep throwing this lie.
The international Justification was a lie, the same lies in Syria, Iraq, and Libya. Know the lie.

If it is international Justification, then it could be stated. All the Lies they said and the propaganda was the international justification....

The truth is about oil and france strangle hold of africa. get sense.

You call my own propaganda, but your own about France Oilfield is not propaganda? Face front jor. The West is not in the business of provoking war for the intent of taking oilfields from Italy and giving to France. Lockerbie and Arab League is a better reason than all that nonsense. That is after the fact.

Ihebu4chelsea:
Chief can i message you privately... Wanna discuss something with you. Thank you!!

Go ahead

BlueMann:
I lowkey don't want RLC sold, because of his versatility. That man can play almost everywhere. Good squad player to have.

We don't pay such salary for squad players. He can go if there is a bidder at the table

benalvino3:
.

Oga, thats not the reason, it is all nonsense. First, your stupid reason was the Lockerbie bombing. All the actors involved never mentioned that.



you did not agree with their actions but you are here defending them and giving reasons they themselves did not give. Ghadaffi has a bad past, he acknowledged it and he says times have changed and he has changed. His people wish he is still around today. So the Question for you is what did Obama achieve by leading a coalition to kill him and what is the state of the people he claimed to be helping?

.
Did you even watch the 3 videos I posted? why was France so interested? Have you not talked about the Countries in Africa that are prisoners of the French? Did you know Ghadaffi wanted to free those countries economically? what about the oil? why are you not talking about the deals that are at the heart of that conflict? why do you think they are going after Syria? Assad was killing his own people right and they cannot sit and watch him just like how they cannot sit and watch Gadaffi abi?



Biden did something great yesterday, he killed Alqaeda's leader. Obama did his own bin Laden, Trump did to several including ISIS leader and Irans Sulemani... all of them stood on the podium and said why they did it. Terrorists will be found and killed where ever they are. Gadaffi's death was not the case. You coming to say the quote above shows you are lost.

Did they follow the rules? When they called for a cease-fire, did they even give them time to cease fire? Nope... their intent was not to stop the violence, it was to put a proxy who will give them oil. its that simple.



No US government does and Saudi relies on the US as well. it does not mean that if Saudi tells the US to bomb country X the US should start manufacturing propaganda.

You are supporting what happened and saying you did not support it at the same time.

The Saudis have a role in 9/11 as well... how is America revenging?
How did America respond to an Israeli attack on the American warship USS liberty that killed 35 marines?
it is not even clear that Gadaffi was responsible for the Lockerbie bombing.

After the Crash, Two of the accused men surrendered themselves and faced trial in Scotland. which terrorist does that? then the Libyan government took responsibility and paid Billions in compensation. again, which terrorist does that?

causing the UN to lift its sanctions placed on Libya. again, why? isn't that an act of terrorism by the state of Libya? why remove the sanctions then?

You are ranting at the wall over things I never argued with you. I have told you how America works, simple. Keep waiting for Bush to tell you he invaded Iraq because of assassination attempt by Saddam on his father. There are internationally justified reasons for military intervention, and there are reasons that can't be stated. Lockerbie is one.

benalvino3:
you are sounding like a mindless worm. The Arab league requested a no-fly zone so the UN rushed to deliver it. All the Videos I posted mean nothing. You still believe the Lie of Saddam has WMD right? The UN does not carry out a No-fly zone because an Arab league asked them to. They lied that Ghadaffi was causing atrocities as a pretense to go in all for Oil. stick to what you see in the news. You are seriously brainwashed. What has the killing of Ghadaffi caused?

All those movies from the 90s have brainwashed you where you see the US as always the Good guy and anything they bomb is bad.

It is stupid to tie this whole thing with the Lockerbie bombing... Only VOLTRONS will do that. After Libya, Syria should have shown you a pattern... help yourself and research Libya, Benghazi, and Syria.

Because the Arab league requested. Do you think that's how things work? they throw your bait and you eat it. Fish brain.

the whole thing has nothing to do with Oil abi? just Ghadaffi killing people in Libya abi? and the Arab league wants him gone so the US will go and kill him.

In the Video I posted, the 2nd one shows it was Qatar that sponsored the Up-rising but there is more to it. the part France played and How obama lead the whole thing. Educate yourself. the Uprising itself was a failed uprising.

Obama gave you his reasons for killing Ghadaffi and non of them has anything to do with Lockerbie etc. stop pulling crap out of your ass. You pal Obama is worse than bush and Putin put together.

Stop ranting off topic. I have told you the reason for intervention in Libya. I didn't say I agree with it, nor would you ever see me support the invasion of Iraq based on WMD lie. The reason for intervention in Libya is as I said, to treat Ghaddaffi fückup, and on request of the Arab League; and I posit that every American leader would have done the same. No country will come and tell you they are revenging terrorist attacks from the 1980s, countries need a justification for armed intervention and "protection of civilians" is a justification that follows the rules of international engagement, not talking about terrorist attacks from 1988, but if you check many headlines after Ghaddaffi was killed, you will see "Justice for Lockerbie at last".

I have told you that anything Saudi wants, Saudi gets as Americas strategic ally, and no USA Govt will turn back on Saudi. Add in revenge factor of Lockerbie, and Ghaddaffi goose was cooked. Check American involvement in Yemen for clues if you want to argue that your man Trump won't support Saudis in conflict.

benalvino3:
VOLTRON I think you need to get your head checked from all the propaganda and lies controlling you. look at the bolds and laugh at yourself.

All you posted up there was rubbish. Obama revenging for Lockerbie, He is making noise. total rubbish Because you are Voltron, You must defend.

the Qataris actions were nothing and a failed uprising without Nato. They did exactly the same in Syria.

You are now tying Lockerbie to it. something or excuse that even Obama did not use. there was never a time Libya was strong enough to face the US. just as how they destroyed Syria, they destroyed Libya.

If they make noise so? are they attacking anyone? Ghadaffi was not making noise before they killed him, he was helping. he also warned them of the immigration crisis and terrorism he is helping to prevent.

Mumu, everything I posted that you bolded is facts. Ghaddaffis Arab brothers were the ones who requested the no fly zone, and were the ones who sponsored the uprising against him. The West were happy to see him go, just like they would any Al Qaeda terrorist leader that killed Westerners. They don't need to spell it out for you.

CoolUsername:
Funny how it's the black democratic POTUS who managed to Bleep things up for the largest black population in the world. Not even the most racist, alt right, KKK lunatic could have dreamt of causing so much black suffering.

You must be joking to think Ghaddaffi will bomb an American plane and any American President won't go after him the moment he shows weakness. Whether black, white, democrat or Republican, any American President would have done the same. What happens after cannot be predicted. America never forgets. They go treat your fückup when the time is right.

Even if America and UK had heart to forgive him for Lockerbie which they never would, all the Arab countries were pressing to get rid of him after numerous insults to the Saudi Royal family and even a rumoured assassination plot on King Abdullah. Libya had no relevance in the Arab League and that's why he came to African Union to throw his weight around. You never see Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco making noise in the AU, only Ghaddaffi and that's because he was non grata in the Arab League. It was the Arab League that requested a no fly zone over Libya from the UN, and it was the Qataris that funded the uprising. These are America's strategic allies calling for the ousting of a President who has carried out terror attacks on Americans. A no brainer.

popizaino:
Stop this hindsight cus I will just dig out some of your posts in 2009 and those of your likes underrating this same Barcelona team.

Nonsense. . . Rijkaard squandered Barcas brilliant squad and everyone knew it.

Gambojimeta is not BrotishNaija. SMH

God1000:
How is she evil? For supporting democracy and human rights

You are talking to mad man. Ignore him

Jew rat this, Jew rat that, DemonRat this, Deep swamp that. Signs of mental instability

Ihebu4chelsea:
One thing i want you to understand is this.... Chelsea is a Big Club. Not where to conduct Trial and Error Experinment

The error of Werner, Lukaku, Havertz, Kepa, Ziyech, Puli never do you.

Is there any big signing we made in the last 4 years that has been successful except Kovacic and Chilwell to a certain extent?

The three trial we did in Mendy, Thiago and Sarr, at least Mendy and Thiago hit. Sarr we can sell because his price is low and his wage is low, and Fulham even want him, while we are reasoning how to dash out Ziyech, Lukaku, Werner and Kepa.

Liverpool used Robertson, Tsimikas, Matip, Joe Gomez, Wijnaldum, Milner and Harvey Elliot as trial players to full up their squad successfully. Now they are doing another trial with Carvalho. The Gabriel Jesus and Zinchenko City just sold are trial players. Dey there thinking every player must be £50m, you will end up with bunch of unsellable useless players like we have now. Every player from abroad is a trial. What makes Fofana with one year injury and one year experience in England or Cucurella with one year in England less of a trial than Diallo who has played in Dortmund and PSG, in UCL and already has two of his brothers and Senegal defensive partners in the dressing room? Player valuation is simply based on which player has had opportunity to shine at that moment. There are many players whose value is low due to one thing or the other, does not mean they are not good players. Like I said, Spurs upgraded massively with two unwanted players from Juventus for peanuts.

6ixT8:
Ibime come and talk about the sponsorship. E be like na you go sponsor am. As e sure me say na you go still be the champion again.


I also noticed last season that Nairalnad FPL has gone overseas, there are lot of Indians manager on board.

I no know where all those Indians come from oh. Maybe Muki needs to clean them up.

Playing for money no.make sense because players will just start copying template teams in order to chase money

lordfalcao:
you always rated ake highly. you were against Chelsea selling ake, to Bournemouth few years ago.

Why you don’t rate him high? You once called him a 35M player in the future, now you are angry the club wants him back

Chelsea was playing 3 at the back at the time and looking forward to robust players that can play 4 at the back and he's not strong enough. Rating a home based player that can do a job on cheap wages is different to blowing £50m on what is supposed to be a sure starter. He made the £40m I predicted and now you that chased him away saying you want finished products is now telling us to buy him and forget unfinished product like Colwill who is better than him at his agez and probably even better than him now, to pay £50m and £150k.wages for something you had for free. Does that make sense to you? Meanwhile you only ascribe "finished product" to him because Tuchel bid £45m. Last time he was a starter, he was getting relegated

raumdeuter:
Chelsea also won the CL in 2020, Their midfield of Mount and Jorginho made the Euro final, Jorginho was actually Best player in Europe winner
Last season Chelsea finished 19points off the league winner

So its expected for any coach to win the sextuple with Chelsea this season (lets even forget the issue of losing their icon Ronaldinho and Deco). Similar to Chelsea losing Kante

Chelsea have not been challenging in the league in the last 5 years unlike Barca who finished joint top just 12 months earlier

Ihebu4chelsea:
Chief. Why do you always recommend those 2 Psg Centre back. Kehrer and Diallo? Our goal is how to beat Liverpool and Mancity to win the Epl. And we need the best in the TW. And not some Psg Rejects

So na Ake wey breeze fit drop for ground we want use beat them? Or Dumbfries?

At least I've seen Diallo lock down all those star players like Salah, Zaha in AFCON with no sweats. Guess who Napoli is chasing to replace Koulibaly?