₦airaland Forum

WritterNg:
⚡U.S. Senator Graham calls ICC arrest warrants against Netenyahu and Gallant as "outrageous":

Warning that the U.S. could be targeted next, Graham says, “If we do not act forcefully against the ICC…we are making a huge mistake.”

To counter this, Graham says he plans to introduce legislation targeting nations that support the ICC’s actions, stating:

“Any nation that joins with the ICC after this outrage is a partner in a reckless act that tramples the rule of law.”

Vic2023:
Welcome

obedience4:
😅😅😅😅

Go through my posts I stated and I quote" The YPG do not kill or attack civilians"
until you can prove otherwise I won't be drawn into a worthless back and forth

Yes suicide bombings are OK, at long as it is targeted against combatants.

obedience4:
😅😅😅

Remember what now clown?? The last thing I can reminisce from the irksome discuss with you was your constant tendency to jumb from pillar to post.

Still waiting for your evidence to show the YPG killing and attacking civilians.

Gbadebo19:
Yes, the clown 🤡 who can't properly interpret a legal provision.

obedience4:
Are you not the clown who couldn't secern between the YPG and the PKK??

🤡🤡🤡😅😅

motayoayinde:
They're not very smart people after all.

obedience4:
Pillar to post

Bright bulbs indeed

obedience4:
So one Israel soldier is now the yardstick to gauge a whole nation.

Bright bulbs

Lawag3:
What's the point of debunking?


You can't debunk genuine facts.

You debunk what doest have a sound base as you said.

Mille:
I tire o.

No one will fight over the descendants of traitors.

Gbadebo19:
Don't hide guy. There is nothing anonymous about me. My name and picture had been posted here several times. There are people who know me physically and can describe me to you. So, am not anonymous.

Gbadebo19:
Sorry to say. I swear, you are mad. You don't understand human beings at all. Am done with you.

Gbadebo19:
Let me respond to your number 4. Whether you like it or not, as long as there is no verifiable history to support your position, you can never win. Your populatuon doesn't matter. Take for instance, Ilorin Nigeria has an 80% population of Yorubas. Now the question is:
If Nigeria were to break up today, Who owns Ilorin? Yoruba or Fulani? Let me see your view

Gbadebo19:
Let me respond to your number 4. Whether you like it or not, as long as there is no verifiable history to support your position, you can never win. Your populatuon doesn't matter. Take for instance, Ilorin Nigeria has an 80% population of Yorubas. Now the question is:
If Nigeria were to break up today, Who owns Ilorin? Yoruba or Fulani? Let me see your view

Gbadebo19:
Can you please avail me with the Internationally recognised borders of 1967

Gbadebo19:
Don't let's argue further. Can we just agree that Israelites had a longer history on the land more than the Palestinians? 1000 years BC to the 7th century is quite long. Do you agree?

Gbadebo19:
I am getting tired of you now.
You know something? Let's start from 1948 or if you have any historical fact or documented evidence that we can use to render the UN creation of Israel as illegal. Cest finis

Gbadebo19:
My friend, as an objective learned colleague. If a thief lives next door to you and continually burgles your home, as a reasonable human being, what would you do even after several communal intervention, the thief never stops.

Gbadebo19:
Let us give you the benefit of the doubt.
1. Palestine had no history
2. Israel had no claim
3. In 1948, justice was done by demarcating the land between two opposing elements. Rather than abide, Palestine claims they own the land (without proof) and keeps attacking Israel. Israel responds and Palestine is crying. Where does that leaves us?

Or don't tell me your view is that Israel shouldn't exist. If so, can you provide any historical fact or documented evidence that can be used to render the 1948 demarcation as illegal? If you can do this, I swear, I will respect you forever.

Gbadebo19:
Guy, it seems that you think the reason why Israel is fighting Palestinians today is because of biblical history of Gaza and the likes belonging to them. Don't get confused, we all know this is not true. By the partition of 1948, the borders of Israel was demarcated and the only reason why there is no peace in that region is because of the relentless attacks from Arab nations and Palestinians which forces Israel to push them backwards. Israel occupying those Gaza and Golan heights etc is a result of them loosing the war they started and that is nobody's fault.
Even till today, everyone knows that loosing war comes with loosing land especially if you share borders. If I am wrong, why is Egypt not claiming Gaza, what about Lebanon, Jordan, Syria and the likes. Why is it some random people (Palestinians) claiming lands that belongs to other sovereign nations.

Gbadebo19:
You are very funny!!!
By the way, I never said you did.
It is actually absurd for you to state that the reason why Italians never lay claim was because it is not legitimate in the 21st century. How can you use a conquest of over a thousand years ago and use a 21st century legality to justify reasons.

Lawag3:
You debunk it if it's false.

Gbadebo19:
It is absolutely useless and no one is using it. You are the ones going back and forth on the legality of Israel to exist as a nation.
United Nations already partitioned the land, recognising the right of both Israel and Palestine to exist. (Two state solution)
It is you people who believe Israel doesn't have a right to exist that bring up stories which necessitate the need to tell you that what you are even claiming never belonged to you. Okay, no biblical stories, can you cough up anything document or history that established that Palestinians were the original owners of ancient Judea?

Gbadebo19:
Italians have a stronger claim due to the Roman conquest of biblical Israel. Definitely!!
This is the only sensible thing you have said in the last 17 years but you failed to realize that the Italians never lay claim to the land, they only established their government there and allowed the Jews to continue calling it theirs. In those times, you live according to the will of your captors.

Gbadebo19:
Hope you know histories have a timeline and things occur one after the other.
We are talking about how the state of Israel initially existed to how Judea came to be known as Palestine. I just wonder how people like you just happen to believe that a group of people who never had a king, never had a capital, never had a currency can legitimately own a land.
Even Africans that were termed uncivilised by the colonial masters had cowry shells as money, we had a seat for the king. Come on, don't be dumb.

Gbadebo19:
Are you blind? Did you not see conquest?
The conquest is a biblical story, I agree. But you forget that it is the same biblical stories that ever established the first existence of the fundamental human right to religion in the code of Hammurabi.
Isn't it hypocritical to use biblical stories to establish the first ever documented human right and then turn against it when it talks about Jewish conquest?

Gbadebo19:
Who is giving you biblical stories? I am telling you of historical facts and the actions of Emperor Hadrian who renamed ancient Judea to Palestine simply because he wanted to wipe out every trace of Jewish history because they seriously opposed his government (Do you see that in any Bible?)
The biggest mistake you make is to think the ancient Philistines are the current day Palestinians.
That place came to belong to biblical Jews through conquest which was a valid means as at that time. Are you now satisfied? Or you want me to school you like a kindergarten pupil?