Italo's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Italo's Profile › Italo's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 (of 308 pages)
Goshen360: New International Version (©2011)You accuse me of saying something that is not (explicitly) stated in scripture and tell me to prove it with scripture... But you say somethings that are not in scripture too...and you make no attempt to prove your statements with scripture. Isnt that double standards?! Can you show me where scripture says: "The name 'Catholic church' is a name of a denomination IN OR WITHIN THE ONE CHURCH OF THE LIVING GOD?" The answer is NO! However, I can show from Scripture that the Biblical Church is the Catholic Church but it will be even clearer if you let me add extra-scriptural sources like the Early Church Fathers to prove to you unequivocally that the Biblical Church was the Catholic Church. Which method do you choose? *bear in mind that the same method will be applied to you too.* Goshen360: Second, like we started, if this is NOT private interpretation from you, what is it because you're the one constructing your own words into 'God-breathed' words......definition of private interpretation again,..."(of private) interpretation;" i.e. the writers of Scripture did not put their own construction (of words) upon the "God-breathed" words they wrote.This your point is INVALID because I believe private interpretation is okay, as long as it is in line with Catholic teaching. I said that before: italo: I'm saying it is the duty of the Catholic Church to teach men the doctrine of God. You can go and interpret it the way you want...if you are in line with Catholic teaching, fine... if not...sorry. Goshen360: Third, and again, this course seek to teach and\or discuss how we can STUDY to arrive at the accuracy of the preserved TRUTH of God's word. Yes, you're right, the church, that is we, Christians are the pillar and foundation of the truth BUT how do we teach the truth? How do we preserve that truth which we are the foundation? If we are the foundation and pillar of the truth, how can we ensure falsehood is NOT build upon the foundation and pillar of such truth? That's what this course seek to discuss.Why did this imaginary and ambiguous "church" of yours rely on the visible and mystical Catholic Church which Christ founded to preserve the written truth of God's word by compiling the Bible and deciding which books to keep and which to discard in the 4th century? How can you be the foundation and pillar of truth when you dont even know what truth is? One "christian" says Jesus is solely DIVINE, another says he was solely HUMAN, yet another says he was both DIVINE and HUMAN. Is this the "one Lord, one faith" St Paul talked about in Eph 4:4-6? PLEASE ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS OF MINE O Goshen360: I started by saying or telling us the God's way to arrive at the accuracy of the truth, you disagree it is not 'scripture interpret scriptures' and I expected you to simple mention another point but you pointed us to 1 Timothy 3:15 and you said, that church is the Catholic church BUT that scripture itself NEVER mentioned Catholic church as 'church', you did. You need to just tell us how we can accurately arrive at the truth other than what I said and let's move on.I already mentioned it. Submit to the teaching of God's Church - The Catholic Church. That is how you arrived at the accuracy of the truth that Mark and Luke wrote "Mark" and "Luke" under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. These werent written anywhere in those books. That is how you knew that "Acts of Peter" and "Gospel of Barnabas" are not inspired word of God. That is how even your Protestant fore-fathers got to know the TRUTH himself - Jesus Christ. The Catholic Church told them and they believed. They didnt see. WHY STOP NOW? You were ignorant and they taught you and gave you the Bible, now pride has set in and you believe you know better than them. |
Goshen360: Having time now, working from my computer and going back again to read; I found the 'problem' of holding the thread from here. Now, what is meant by 'allowing scripture to interpret scripture' is the only way God says the word can be VOID OF PRIVATE INTERPRETATION. That is, I cannot pick a scripture now and built on it BY EXPLAINING OR INTERPRETING IT WITH WORDS OF MAN'S WISDOM without using another scripture that explains how I arrived at the interpretation I'm giving to the former scriptures that one is seeking meaning to. For example,In order to just cut the long story short and prove to you that this your "let scripture interpret scripture" method is not a sure way of arriving at truth and is not devoid of private interpretation, let us put it to practice on a particular issue. In John 6:35, Jesus declares, "I am the bread of life..." The Catholic Church says he was talking about Holy Communion which we receive at mass and believe it appears as bread and wine but is ACTUALLY the body and blood of Jesus...and I believe it because I believe the sure way to know God's teaching is to listen to the Catholic Church. You, as a Protestant, obviously have a differing opinion (correct me if I am wrong). What is your actual position about this matter and how can you prove it to be the truth, using your preferred "let scripture interpret scripture" method, without infesting your explanation with your PERSONAL INTERPRETATION? Please go ahead. |
Tgirl4real: Can you tell me what makes the Roman Catholic Church different from the C n S u mentioned?Answer my question...at least I answered yours. Are you saying it is Cherubim and Seraphim...or your imaginary "universal church" that includes millions of people and "churches" teaching millions of contradictory and differing doctrines under the inspiration of millions of "holy spirits" that should teach us all truth? Tgirl4real: Of course it is.Then why did you accept when they infallibly declared the 27books of the NT to be inspired and declared books like "Acts of Peter," "Gospel of Barnabas" and many other books to be uninspired? Tgirl4real: Is it not made up of humans?So the writers of the NT werent infallible? If they were fallible, why do you accept their teaching as God's law?.. When they could have been mistaken Tgirl4real: How do u expect mere men to interprete scriptures without allowing their personal preference, experience and opinion cloud it (same thing u accuse Goshen of) if there is no room for validation?It is the duty of the Church to interpret scripture by the spirit that Jesus has sent to guide it to all truth. |
try harder |
Tgirl4real: Lol @ remix.I know these more than you, I think. Tgirl4real: Having said that, you must also know that "The Church of God" - the body of Christ consist of those who are saved not the many denominations we see around.Who are "those who are saved?" Tgirl4real: So, quit looking @ "the church' as a disjointed body that don't agree on a single doctrine. The true Church of Christ have ONE Faith, ONE Lord, ONE Baptism and practise the same doctrine.St Paul said the Church is the household of God... It is visible. Matt 18:17 If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector. How can you report someone to an invisible church? You and Jesus are clearly not talking about the same church. You are on your own. |
Tgirl4real: Looking at this (ur) submission again and what u claim Goshen would do unknowingly...The Catholic Church - Yes! Are you saying it is Cherubim and Seraphim...or your imaginary "universal church" that includes millions of people and "churches" teaching millions of contradictory and differing doctrines under the inspiration of millions of "holy spirits?" Tgirl4real: 2. Are u also saying that the leadership of the RCC (Papalcy -- I hope I'm correct) is Infallible?The Papacy - Yes. Are you saying it is fallible? |
Everybody mustu talk...even the one wey no get anything to talk...nairaland sha |
Bobbysworld28: When we say Catholic aren't we all Catholic? Catholic means universal. So I tell u this I am catholic too. We all r. But not d Roman one. Because immediately d church got to Rome & embraced its traditions d heresy we hv now was spawned. I urge all Roman Catholics to read d words of Jesus & compare them to d misnomer dt they practice now. Now also take time to digest d body of revelation d Apostle Paul penned down while digesting d ones Jesus' disciples wrote. frosbel: The church does not validate the bible.@ Goshen360 and Tgirl4real, do you see what I was telling you I was trying to avoid? re-read my post again: italo: I will tell you plainly at my own time. Please be patient. I want this discussion to be as reasonable as possible. So far there has not been much exchange of reasoning perhaps because some of the fanatics and psychopaths on nairaland have nothing reasonable to add. But I assure you, if I point you to the PILLAR and FOUNDATION of TRUTH, you'll see them rushing in to condemn it without even reasonably addressing the topic of discussion...thereby, derailing the thread.Do you see that I was perfectly right? People who had nothing to contribute all day have suddenly awoken at the slightest opportunity to express their hatred for the Catholic Church. Notice that they are not even addressing the main topic of discussion in any constructive way. You see that they want to turn the thread to another 'Catholic-bashing' thread... |
You tell us the Jesus the Catholics worship. Afterall you claim you were a Catholic for years and your family are still Catholic. So which Jesus did you and your family worship all those years? |
Is Davidylan the only human being on this thread? |
freshpapi: @Italo: r u saying we have to wait for the catholicWhy then did you wait for them to compile the Bible and tell you which books were inspired and which were not? I'm saying it is the duty of the Catholic Church to teach men the doctrine of God. You can go and interpret it the way you want...if you are in line with Catholic teaching, fine... if not...sorry. freshpapi: Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.Okay, tell us then, who is correct, out of the millions of people and churches teaching different and contradictory doctrines through the illumination of the Holy Spirit? |
Good luck with your "freedom" that leaves you chained to other people's problems. |
Goshen360: Okay. Back to what I started....allowing scriptures explain scripture, can you use another scripture to show us that the 'church' in the context or as used in the verse quoted, means SPECIFICALLY Roman catholic?You have either not been reading this thread thoroughly or you are avoiding certain things here. I challenged your position that using scripture to explain scripture is not a sure way of knowing the truth and I gave my reasons. I said using scripture to explain scripture only means 'using your fallible personal interpretation of other scriptures (which could be wrong) to explain your fallible personal interpretation of the first scripture 9which could be wrong too). ...And you had nothing to say about it...only to ask me now to use the same method I debunked. I also said the Church existed before the Bible and even created it. The Church validates the Bible and not the other way round. The Church, not the Bible, is the Pillar and foundation of truth...so believe what the Church tells you. Thats what the BIBLE says. |
Tgirl4real: I'm a Chriatian and I don't belong to the Roman Catholic Church.Here is what that verse says: Eph 4: 4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism; 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. It doesn't say that "Every believer is a member of the universal body of Christ." You are the one that 'remixed' it to say that. Do you see what the verse 5 says? Some say Jesus was a mere man, we Catholics say he is God. How can "every believer" then have "one faith?" Is this one faith? Many say homosexuality is a grievous sin...yet some say it is not a sin... is this one faith? It is obvious that the "believers" in this your imaginary "universal church" have millions of faith. How can it then be the Church of the ONE LORD in verse 5? On the contrary the Catholic Church I know has only one Lord, one faith and one baptism, just like in verse 5. Make your deductions. |
Mayowura: Thread's going nice."Confusion?"... Amen. "Argument?" It can be good as long as it is a reasonable tranquil argument and not just filled with hate and bias. |
Goshen360: @ italo,Yes. |
truthislight: I dont have "a superior bible knowledge", am still learning.I put it to you that you are scared to say who you think that verse is talking about. |
any new gist? *whistling* |
IIIIxRoyalxIIII: So you Choose to be a Slave? Oh OkNone of your business. |
truthislight: "Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called god, or that is worshipped; so that he as god sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is god." (2 Thessalonians 2:4).Brother, you have a superior Bible knowledge, please tell me. I too want to know the person. |
The Catholic Church is the Catholic Church, whether Roman or Nigerian or Argentinian. That is why we have an Argentine Pope and we are still ONE. Tgirl4real: Cos all believers are a member of the Catholic ChurchProve this. |
ifeness: You have no choice but to obey! sheepI have options. I can disobey, but I CHOOSE to obey... ...and none of it is your business so I'm wondering why you're loosing sleep over it when I'm very happy. |
Dont tell me you are this daft... If your kill the Pope, we'll have another one in two weeks. The events of the last two weeks are sufficient to make even a non-living thing know that...much less you. |
Syncan: Humility continues to evade you.Though we're hidden in anonymity,but your actions speak so loud that your words become mere noise. You accused a man of not mentioning Jesus, irrelevant as that may be to those he shepherds,It has long been pointed out to you that you acknowledged that he did say a prayer "Hail Mary" which included words from the scripture, and in this prayer was the word "Jesus" reverently mentioned. The accusation remains the title of this thread and it is wrong. You need to acknowledge your gaffe, it is true Christianity to say "I was wrong, I'm sorry". As long as you do not...all i see is pride, the more you put up defenses, even you know you're going far away from light.!!! |
ijawkid: Italo u never still stop this your mumu run arounds??.......Please excuse me, there are intelligent men here I want to discuss with...unlike the other thread where you idiots were having a field day. |
Its just an advice: dont kill yourself over this issue because we Catholics are happy with our Pope. But you have a right to kill yourself if you insist. |
There is only one Church, one faith and one doctrine of our Lord, Jesus Christ (correct me if I'm wrong) It is the duty of that one church to transmit God's one doctrine to the children of God and that is how it was for 1500years before the heretics came and turned everything upside down...now look at the confusion they have put you people. The Church is infallible in its teachings because Christ has given the Church the Spirit to teach it the truth. That is why you believed that Mark wrote "Mark" and that it was inspired by the Holy Spirit. Because the infallible Church told you so. The Church wrote the New Testament and compiled the Bible and declared it the word of God in the fourth century...and you submitted to their authority. 1Tim 3:15 says the Church is the pillar and foundation of the truth. That one church that was founded by Christ is the one that compiled the Bible in the fourth century...it is the same one that Luther broke away from in the 16th century to start this confusion... That one church is the Catholic Church. |
what are you people doing here? worshiping the bible or what?[/quote]What is the pope doing here? Decoration or what?[quote author=Boomark]
|
davidylan: 1. So does the moldy heart heal or cure evil spirits?The heart of St. John Vianney, like Elijah's bones, St Peter's shadow, the handkerchiefs and aprons that touched St Paul...cannot cure anything by themselves. However they can cure evil spirits and even do much more through the power of God that is communicated through them and other relics. davidylan: 2. I do not subscribe to the use of handkerchiefs by pentecostals.Forget about those fraudsters. Do you subscribe to the use of handkerchiefs and aprons in Acts 19? Do you agree that you were wrong in thinking that relics were only permissible in the Old Testament? |
Enigma: Interesting irony going on here.I wondered too. Why they are so keen on the pope mentioning Jesus when they think Jesus was only a mere man. Frustrated haters! |
I dont know, since I am not a slave. All I am saying is that we Catholics are okay with our pope, so you people should kill yourselves because of it. |
davidylan: Dear friend i answered you. Back in the old testament, the people didnt have the luxury of an in-dwelling Holy Spirit. They had to rely on physical acts divine power unlike us who now have a advocate with the Father through the blood shed on the cross. God used a myriad of opportunities to reach His people - Elisha's bones, a river, an ass, a harlot etc. Do we also venerate a river for curing Naaman of his leprosy?Acts 19: 11 "God did extraordinary miracles through Paul, 12 so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them." God also used handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched St Paul to reach His people. Did this also happen in the Old Testament or it happened in the New Testament? Be honest, if it were Catholics taking handkerchiefs and aprons that had merely touched a priest or bishop to the sick, what would you say about us? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 (of 308 pages)




