₦airaland Forum

Martinez39s:
@emboldened

Why part with something valuable (your money) just to cut out nagging and long talk when you can cut her off if she is not ready? What happened to the abundance mindset? Are there no girls that will fùck you for free? The guys that are fùcking for free, do they have two heads? I have never been a fan of exchanging money, which is valuable, for something worthless as pùssy. As I have always said here, pùssy is worth $0.00.

The fact that a girl is giving you nagging and long talk instead of getting down to business and fùcking you shows she is not sexually attracted to you. A girl that finds you hot and wants to fùck you will be on your case, make herself available and get down to business without playing games or stalling. Females don't fight or delay their sexual desires when the opportunity arises to... you know.

Anyway, I won't impose it on people how to spend their cash.

Martinez39s:
You are missing the point. I didn't say you should have any business with the guys fùcking her for free. The thing is, if it is being given to others for free, why are you paying for it? Why is your case different?

Some will say "well, if you are not paying money, you are also paying with your time and attention". This is ludicrous because everything you do in life requires your time and attention no matter how short; even sleeping takes time, though not attention. The same is with fùcking. You can't help it, but you can help not giving your valuable resources (money) for something worthless as pùssy. If you don't have sex, you will not die. While you can't help giving your attention and time to the things you do, the important thing is not to squander too much of it on unproductive and worthless things, or even to the extent that they interfere with productive and worthy things that you have to do.

"But what about the time spent wooing and/or chasing" well, what happened to not spending (too much) time trying to get someone that is not responding? Where is the abundance mindset?

"I like what I see, I pay, I fùck."
One thing people who use this argument don't know is that this argument, and its variations, can be used by simps who subscribe to a hoès' OnlyFans accounts or who spend and invest considerable amount of money to maintain their relationships. In fact, that argument and its variation can be used to justify many simp behaviours. After all, they can say "I like what I see, I pay and get it" coupled with "it's my money, I spend how I like. If they are the rich types who spend 100k or more for sex, like some Nigerians do, they can say "it's chicken change to me, I see what I like, I pay, I fùck".

James Harden, NBA star, once regularly spent $20,000 just to spend time and have sex with model Jenna Shea. A lot of rappers and NBA star spend up to $10,000 just to have sex with these hòes. You might say you wouldn't got to such extent, but he can use your logic of "I like what I see, I pay for it, and I fùck." How then can you now caution this simp? How then can you complain and deal with the issue of the female entitlement and their overestimation of their self worth and pùssy? It is when he realizes his value, learns game, understands that others are fùcking her for free, and gets girls for free that his foolishness will dawn on him. Unfortunately, people like short cut. Some people think they can't go beyond basic stuffs until they pay; with that mindset, they will never get the sluty monster side of a girl for free. When you know you can get it for free is when you start expecting it for free.

How can simps take the red pill seriously if at the end of the day they see redpillers acting like them, to whatever degree, and using the same justifications and rationalization they use?

We can agree to disagree. It's perfectly okay.

Nah! Not every greenlight is a genuine greenlight; not every choosing signal is genuine. Let's not forget that women are master manipulators and are aware of the basic things we discuss here, like choosing signals. If a woman is stalling and making things a little bit hard for you, she was not really turned on by you. Women will even pay for sex and hot male bodies if they are that good. That's a fact!

If you have seen where women are chasing men they want to fùck and paying huge transport money to see these men, you will never chase a woman in your life again.

ubunja:
I like what you said last time when you said people will do what they want with their money. And I know some slow thinkers took your words to mean it's okay to pay for sex if you can afford it since it's one's money. Which is sad.

Paying for sex is a moment of weakness when you wanna deal with Lust quick quick. From time to time men will slip and fall, but it must never be bragged about and put up for the world as something of an achievement. Because it's not. Buy pussy if you fall but know it's a weakness and chastise yourself after. This is the reason why guys must learn to have a rotation.

Have I ever brought pussy myself? Yep. About 4 times when I first came to South Africa. Seeing barely naked bootylicious coloureds made me lose frame for a minute. But tell you what? I don't even remember enjoying anything because all these encounters were about 3 mins each because my mind wasn't at rest which meant my dick wasn't even that hard. I was just too distracted by the stupidity of it all. After the fourth time I quit that shït. And as fate would have it, a few years later a girl I was sleeping with broke up with her BF and started living with prostitutes. And she came to me and asked me to be her BF intending to give me the money she'll make from selling pussy. And that experience corrupted my mind forever.
To this day I have girls I have given tips online on how to be prostitutes. And have had one or two or three want me to manage them. Now when I see a red piller stand and speak about paying for sex with pride, I feel a disgust I can't put in words.
Prostitutes are intensely interesting people and I'll hang around them all day. But never as a customer. Maybe as a prostitute myself. Or a Manager.

Guys let's not lose our senses. It's too early in the game. Paying for sex is a simp move. Do it but it's not something to brag about.

Skepticus:
I'll give my perspective on this.

Having seen the back and forths, I'll make some things clear from my understanding on this I have observed so far:

A good number of guys who come here to comment have no basic understanding of the red pill, though some may drop comments that indicate some level of awareness but no understanding and when some of them spill ignorance in the name of trying to make comments, and get corrected, the emotional side of them is exposed and you see them making blunders and doing the typical feminine antics of shaming others for exposing their ignorance.

Prostitution is among the oldest professions (not the oldest as some people say) showing that women have always offered their pussy for money even in times where men were naturally red pill aware. Also, at the time (and in the more recent past), societies were closed with women's "sexual misbehaviour" curtailed by religious and other cultural methods. Despite all of this, some women still "misbehaved". Some men still slept with them and they knew it was never a thing to "brag about" knowing that such women were skanks, and no match to the women they had as wives (homely women who assured their paternity).

That said, Justifying picking skanks (prostitutes and other trashy ladies) using the lure of money under the red pill is disingenuous. It's also dangerous because there are a lot of young impressionable men on this thread who may see it as "normal" and will set them up for life as money-paying slaves for pusssy. I've seen it ruin the lives of young men and not make them understand how to attract women despite having physical and financial features that can naturally attract women.

At the beginning of this thread, a brother asked me if picking prostitutes was Red Pill or Blue Pill. My response to him that it WASN'T Red Pill (in all ramifications) and MAY or MAY NOT be blue pill in itself and went to explain to him that prostitution may serve some purpose for certain kinds of men. In that comment, I said it that it is good to reduce the INCELIZATION of men who because of genetic and other artificial cases of severe deformity, can not attract women naturally with their body game, social status or verbal dexterity. Occasionally one may be having sexual thirst and just need a quick fix (like a drug addict) to ejaculate, hence paying for a hooker. I have no issues with that but if you try to justify it as being red pilled or some form of "alpha OG bragging" here, you will get called out. You can take it to the ASHAWO thread which exists for that reason. That thread is serving a beneficial purpose of reducing the INCELs and sexual thirstiness among men (I see some of them getting red pilled in some way because of their experiences with prostitutes). Incels are men who seek vaginas badly but because of being gameless or having an extremely low SMV (here, Looks, Money and Status), they can't access women. Your stories of paying pussies would certainly impress these types of men who don't get pusssy that often and see it as they see it as some kind of golden trophy.

If you take it as being alpha, paying sluts to do different forms of sexual depravity for you, you are just deceiving yourself and you know it. My advice is to pay your sluts, enjoy the temporary high it gives you and keep it shut here because you'd be looked down upon as LOSER (A thirsty, shiftless, incelized one). When I worked with club hoes (some of them are now online using, tinder, badoo, instamessage and codedruns and are the type to get down for dirty sexual behaviours), I saw guys who regularly asked me to help them get these girls and I did. I looked at them the way a drug dealer looked at his drug-addicted client - a LOSER with benefits. I got the same thing you paid for free or almost free which when I look at it now, has nothing special to it. Just empty ego.

Another thing, in the level up world of scheming women (GOLD DIGGERS), the type of sluts most guys (including the ones in ASHAWO thread) spread around or brag about, are looked as bottom feeders who can't even buy a motorbike from their hustles. Only colourful fake designers clothes, dirty wigs and used Iphones. Those at the top wrung of the ladder are going for richer men and are building wealth and investments out of it.

Martinez39s:
It is true that women are attracted to successful men, and no one is disputing that. However, when you talk about who a woman will chose, it should be made clear if you are talking about fùcks or serious relationship (eg. settle down). Lack of distinction between both categories is the major cause of confusion in discussions like this. When it comes to lust, a woman will choose to fùck the guy that turns her on; such a guy can fall in any social class. On the other hand, when you talk about committed relationships, a woman will choose her best financial option that's available regardless of whether he is sexually attractive or not. Hypergamy applies to the situation of committed relationships.

Martinez39s:
Like, I don't know why people keep confusing how a female goes about her lust with how she goes about her survival and committed relationships. The rules are different.

When it comes to lust, a female will choose the guy that turns her on and gets her in the mood regardless of his social class. That's why a rich woman will fùck a hot gym rat that turns her on even though he is barely struggling to pay his rent and isn't fit to tie the shoe lace of her beta husband financially. Lust is a short term thing and what matters at that moment is the satisfaction of that lust, not your ability to pay the bills and give her expensive gifts. Such a guy can be above or below her in social status, rich or poor.

When it comes to committed relationships, particularly courtship and marriage, a woman will choose the best financial option available to her. It doesn't matter if he is a beta, alpha, redpillers or simp. All that matters is financial stability, her comfort and survival, which all boils down to your resources. You ability to satisfy her lust doesn't count as it cannot buy bread. If you are a redpiller with a great sexual appeal and a masculine frame made of adamatium or vibranium, the woman you are discussing marriage with will overlook you and pick the man that has more resources than you even if he the most pathetic simp and he is so unattractive and disgusting. She will pick him even if she has to share him with other women. Women don't marry based on lust and your ability to satisfy them in bed, they consider your resources and what you can provide, and they will keep swinging, at any time, to the better financial option available to them. This is hypergamy. Hypergamy is innate, it only cares about now and it doesn't sleep.

Martinez39s:
Kai. At that point, you lacked some red pill. As I have always said, it is not by decent dressing, nice gestures, wearing christain cover shoes or hijab, speaking in tougues, good character in many aspects, attending Deeper Life church, saying that they are not after your money etc. As usual, a woman can do all these and still be a big hòe and gold digging viper (all women are gold diggers anyway, survival tinz).

The flaw of men is that we look at the outward appearance and make assumptions upon it; making big and hasty assumptions with no room for doubt and suspicion is one of men biggest enemies. This is why men who take the red pill to the fullest are always suspecting and taking all moves a woman makes at the moment with a grain of salt. They play the game and enjoy the flow, but they don't trust or place their full hope on women.


True. We've said this before. However, you missed a red flag. Let me explain.

The Chosen Principle capitalises on LUST (aka genuine desire). A girl that has genuine desire wants to fùck you and get freaky in bed with you, not date you. A grown girl that lusts after you won't tell you that she wants to date you. Dating and serious relationships are reserved for men (blue pill or red pill) that she perceives has the resources; the moment she mentioned "date", you should have known that you were sized financially by her and her friends. You should have known that it was about the cash, not you.

Women will also try to secure rich men, but that is not the "chosen" the Chosen Principle is talking about.

If a girl lusts after you and whats to fuçk you, she will do the following:
(a) make herself readily available,
(b) make it very easy for you to fùck her (she won't stress you at all), and
(c) she will be ready to try many sexual stuffs with you and give her sexual best without you spending a dime.

If a girl you think is choosing you is doing the opposite of these, bounce. Make sure you bring the issue of sex first (as Ubunja would say); if she is not down for it or doing the opposite of the above, bounce. Sex first; you can't know the red pill, think a girl is choosing you and then try to take things slow and look for something serious... sex first! In fact, within a short time of playing the field and digesting red pills, we men should be able to tell when a girl lusts after us from the signs she is giving.

Martinez39s:
Once men can put their ego and delusion aside, and start thinking, they will adapt.

In addition to the need to propagate their genes, most men want the be and feel like the "boss man", the traditional "boss man" like ancient patriarchs with submissive wives. This ego, the need to spread gene, and the blue pill delusion/assumption of thinking their spouses are different (and wouldn't do what other women did to their husbands) keep men on the rigid life path that hasn't acknowledged the massive changes society has gone through.

In pursing this path, they forgot that the ancient patriarchs not only enforced the traditional conventions in his household, they also had social pillars and norms that encouraged and backed them up in their patriarchal roles. The modern societies don't have these social pillars and norms, in fact they frown on them as misogynistic and backward. Ironically, even most modern men who want to live the patriarchal life frown upon these too. Also, the type of woman the ancient patriarchs had are different from modern women: women of old were bred to master home keeping skills, they had no equal rights as these men, and they were to submit and rever their husbands. The men, in turn, didn't just have a free ride: their unquestioned leadership and authority came with huge responsibility and sacrifice for their society and families; they had a huge burden of performance and had to earn their post.

> (Patriarchal male) + (traditional woman of old) + (traditional society and social norms) = Smooth running patriarchal households.

> (Patriarchal male) + (modern woman) + [modern society (especially a gynocentric one) and social] = a project doomed to fail for the patriarch trying to enforce traditional settings.

> (Patriarchal male) + (traditional woman in modern day) + [modern society (especially a gynocentric one) and social] = (a project likely to fail for the patriarch trying to enforce traditional settings. This is probably due to bait and switch and ease with which the woman will acquaint herself with the norms of the modern society and break off from tradition. Women are highly social animals that follow and adapt to the latest trends)

Either men can swallow the red pill, drop their ego, and flow with the trend and social norms that are here to stay and are not going any time soon (just like Ubunja, Skepticus, Zabiboy), or they can make things difficult for themselves by threading the old path. Even if men, especially those in gynocentric societies, want to get into relationships and marriages and retain their masculinity and peace, they must sit down and plan how to fix social situations that will impede these things eg. changing the marital and family laws, setting high standards that they will enforce to make women sit up, changing laws that are biased against fathers' rights, etc.

Unfortunately, men don't do this. They just jump in due to reasons I listed earlier; they think they don't have to worry about anything happening to the social norms since they think their case will be different and they will just find the right woman. Most men are like kids playing with the abacus when others are using scientific calculators.

Skepticus:
In the neighborhood where I grew up, I know boys who (up to this moment) spend their entire 24 hours smoking weed, doing hard drugs. Dirty and dusty. These guys range from 17 - 33 years in age. Knowing a few of them personally, these guys are making every effort in this world not to self improve (they are not even attempting internet fraud like the other young people do), they just hang out in street corners, uncompleted buildings begging for crumbs from neighbourhood dudes, smoking all brands of weed, crack cocaine, popping pills like rohypnol etc. Almost all of them I knew had baby mamas who they met as virgins or with few body counts in their youthful prime. I may be giving off personal information here but I knew one who had 3 baby mamas different women. The guy (his nickname was "Dagger" ) is about 5'5 tall, skinny, spots dreadlocks with burnt charred lips. I met one of his fair, cute baby mamas later in the wealthiest neighborhood of the city. A girl I would rate as a 7 - 8 (very attractive), giving a rich successful bros "headache" in the city much later. In my mind, I was like if this guy knew the dirty broke nonsense guy this girl has fûcked (and probably still fûcking), he would sit down and give himself multiple hard knocks on the head for being a thirsty fool. Na mumu (which most guys are), girls dey "package" for.

Skepticus:
Way to go... I already took my male solipsism to another level. When dealing with a woman, I act like a man but think like a woman as they do when dealing with men by putting their needs first.

A lot of gents in the red pill and those heavily stuck in the blue-pill matrix miss a lot of things about female nature. They can yell "Women are Hypergamous" all day where Hypergamy means women going for what's better but same folks get confused (especially with current complex social events) where a decent number of women are going for what they (by their judgment as men) consider lower than what the women would naturally go for. To summarize it, some women are flipping HYPERGAMY on its head, the way men know it much to their confusion.

That missing link is FEMALE SOLIPSISM which a lot of men in the red pill do not deeply touch and the confusion brings up a lot of discussions that further complicate matters. For the woman, it is all about herself first, when dealing with men from mundane stuff (that men often over-look) like attention, protection to more material stuff like dick, money etc.

It's why I tune off when men try to link parameters that men use in ranking each other (male hierarchy attributes like wealth, social status and competence) and project same in dealing with women. It's a recipe for failure in understanding women. Whether low or high in any of this male hierarchies, women deal with all, as long as it is, to her advantage. Whether the males in whatever ranking of this hierarchies get equal benefits doesn't matter much. Where the males get benefits, the women get greater benefits.

For instance, a very wealthy guy drives a luxury automobile and parks on a street. Both men and women around checks him out. For men generally, they are like "wow, I like this guy's car, I want to earn so much to be able to afford his car and his lifestyle". Women on the other hand think same but take it a notch further: "He appears rich, I want his money, influence etc, to my benefit". This is also the reason why the most feared 60 year old general commanding a legion of men who respects and are intimidated by his presence or a 50 year old mega-rich CEO, would be getting childishly manipulated by a 17 year old girl who has been groomed in the understanding of men. For poorer guys who serve a purpose beneficial to women, it is the same.

I'm all for men (regardless of their rank in male hierarchies) winning in their dealings with women whether they choose to deal with them fully or sparingly. If completely avoiding them also makes a man win, I'm all for it regardless of what society thinks.

Men can do better

Skepticus:
As you chase your dreams and build your value in life, women will come and this is when you have to be very careful, so you don't revert back to the blue pill.

Avoid the beta-buxxx/beta provider role for used-up, damaged women like the cum-dumps of other men (women with high body counts who have been established not to pair-bond), single mothers (excluding those who lost their husbands to death), gold diggers, women on the spectrum etc.

Below, is the tale of your typical, nice guy, high achieving, career-focused beta provider and damaged women who are only in for the provision after enjoying being banged over and over by other men.

Nazgul:
This post was triggered by a friend of mine who is passing through hell in his 3 year old marriage. His wife made him believe that money isn't everything and he ignorantly got married to her in his indigent state. She stopped respecting him a long time ago. As I'm typing this, she has left him with their 1 year old daughter in Lagos and relocated back to Uyo.

So let's talk about money in courtship, Because you will need plenty of it in marriage.

Those who are of the opinion that all that matters in marriage is love not money are not serious! In fact I'd like to term them as jokers. Why? Because love won't pay your bills and put food on the table.

Women naturally respect financially buyouant men. Or in simpler terms, men who have money.

So don't let any woman manipulate you into marriage when you are not financially ready simply because age is fighting against her, because if you succumb to her pressure and get married to her, you are in for a Shocker

Women can sweet tongue you into doing what you don't want to do and blame you for being stupid to listen to her in the first place.

Before any lady corner you and tie you down in forced matrimony, ask the following questions...

1. How much do you both earn monthly? How much will you require to run your marriage monthly? Take inflation into consideration, and calculate how much you will spend on rent, feeding, utility bills, transportation, medicals among others.

2. Who pays the running bills monthly? The husband, the wife or both of you? At what percentage? 50/50, 60/40, 70/30? Discuss it with your Partner.

3. How long will you both work as salary earners? Any plan to invest in other businesses? What does it take? How much of your fiance will it take? What type of sacrifice will it require?

4. Will you engage in monthly savings? If yes, how much percentage of your salaries would go into savings?

5. Will you be operating a Joint or Separate accounts? Discuss this with your partner.

6. If you are running a business; How much does it generate monthly? Would she join you in running it when you get married? If yes how best can you two grow your monthly income?

7. What are your yearly Financial goals? How do you both plan to achieve them?

8. Do you believe in paying tithe, first fruits, offerings and sowing special seeds? You need to discuss this with your partner, so you can both plan ahead whenever the need for such financial commitment arises.

9. What percentage of your income will be going to your parents or siblings monthly? Discuss this with your partner. It's very important.

10. When CHILDREN start coming, how MUCH will you need to take good care of them monthly? Would you want them to attend public school or private school, are there affordable Private schools in your neighborhood where you can enroll them, what percentage of your earnings or savings would they require monthly to see them through nursery and primary school. Would government secondary school be better for them or private? Would public universities be better or private or abroad? These are things you must iron out with your partner before getting married.

Plan your FINANCES before getting married.

Set up your self for Financial growth not Financial failure in marriage.

Most broken marriages occur due to lack of finances or poor financial planning from one or both couples.

ubunja:
yes, men can turn down sex due to self-control and morality issues. That's commendable. The "but" here is that no man must think doing so has a bearing on how women view him. As concerning value and worth.
Because at the end how it plays out is That pucc you're passing on to appear special/different from other men, the lady is just going to take it to another guy! Usually some guy who's always available for quick cheap no-stress sex. Some guys just make it so hard and complicated to give them sex girls simply stop offering.

I'm sure we've all heard of a situation where some morally upright gentleman of a guy had a lady always visiting him acting funny for him but the guy was always "controlling" himself until the lady gave up, stopped visiting and somehow ended up getting pregnant for some clown.
What the gentleman did is really not playing hard to get in the dating sense, he just missed opportunities.

Okay let's switch genders for better clarity.

How does a woman play hard to get?

We go back to the foundation of male/female dynamics: Men love sex, Women love money. Men want sex, Women want money.

A woman then plays hard to get by being stingy with SEX. Cause sex is what men want.
While a man plays hard to get by being stingy with LOVE aka commitment, cause that's what women want.

A man doesn't play hard to get by refusing sex just as a woman doesn't play hard to get by refusing love/commitment/money. A man takes the sex but refuses to give the woman that one thing she wants (love/commitment/money) -that's him playing hard to get. Because until a man is in love or committed the woman hasn't actually got him.

Same way,,, a woman takes the love, commitment and money that's offered to her but denies men that one thing they all want: sex. Cause until a woman has given a man sex, the man hasn't actually got anything worthwhile from the woman. He hasn't yet "got" the woman.
The moment of truth for women is when a man finally commits. And the moment of truth for men is when a woman finally gives sex.

If you're a woman it doesn't matter if Davido or Chris Brown wants to sleep with you. What matters is Do they want to commit?Do they want to marry you? That's the question cause that's what really determines your worth IN THEIR EYES. Being good enough for sex is inferior. Being good enough to committment is superior. Its when a man commits that you have got got him.

That's why when a woman cheats a man's first question is "Did you sleep with him?" Cause for men there's nothing serious until sex happens.
And when a man cheats women's first question is "Do you love her?" Cause women understands that men will fucc anything, its when a man commits that things become serious.

Men and women are looking at sex and love from opposing sides, so what they value, what they see as valuable, is also opposed.

When a girl tells her friends "Moses loves me!" What do the friends ask? They ask, "What has he done for you?!"
Meanwhile, if a guy tells his friends, "Dorothy loves me!" They're going to ask "Did she let you smash?"

Which is to say, A woman can't say "Moses loves me cause he had sex with me". Not really, cause sex is not something men control. Just as a man can't say,"Dorothy loves me cause she bought me this and that". Cause a womans commitment is worthless. As long as he hasn't smashed Dorothy, his friends can't really be convinced Dorothy loves him. Cause the only thing of value Dorothy has is the pucc. Until she puts that on the table, she's holding back.

All this is to illustrate both men and women understand the "moment of Truth" concerning each gender. A woman can't use commitment to show a guy she loves him, just as much as a man can't use sex to show a woman he loves her. Women express love by sex, men express love by commitment. Hence that woman who's hard to fucc is the woman everyone fights for cause she has value.Just like that man who's hard to commit is the man everyone fights for cause he has value.
Which brings us full circle back to the virgin and the Bad boy as the most valuable in the dating field.

ubunja:
they're fighting for their interests. For to acknowledge the red pill will mean they must stop being hoes, in other words they must say NO to casual sex with multiple men. Thats a tall order. Women love sex.
What men must do is we must double our efforts to make sure none of our gender is exploited. This is the very meaning of the gender war.

Dealing with hoes is not wrong but committing to hoes is wrong. You can't be paying top dollar for something trashy jerks have been getting for free for a decade.If only the average man can see the shenanigans the average girl gets up to between the ages of 17 and 27ish, guys wouldn't be too quick to dismiss our message of being selective.
Anyone who has gone to college or university knows what girls get up to while their male coursemates are struggling to get even a proper GF.

CaveAdullam:
Women's pride lies in the number of attention they receive from men.

1. I have observed that women these days will not hesitate to give out their numbers to guys because they see these guys as potential recruits into their hordes of chasers. The only way to sit on top of their list is if from the beginning you already titillated her hypergamy, acted as some interesting movie about to happen, and show intentions of spoiling her with fun and excitement. On a general note, these women just feel like veterans of war because men do chase them.

2. The good side to these chasers is that they are not after defending or protecting her but to fvck her like other men and move on. But the downside is that these guys end up throwing their time, energy, attention, and resources down the drain to please her; some end up being friend-zoned, some manipulated and others jettisoned along the way.

3. If we should observe this photo clearly, there is a higher probability that the man feeding her with his cum/seeds is not on that list, the guys on that list are just chasers wanting their fill. Let's go a little bit deeper:

A. All women have that one specific man they love with all their heart, with all their might, with all their mind, and with all their life. The funniest thing is that this man can either be rich or poor, but take it that every woman has that particular man she wants to spend her life with.

B. Despite the aforementioned, she may still cheat on that man she claimed she loves so dearly. However, whomever she cheats with is her golden calf and not her god (take the Israelites of the Bible as an example).

That's why a woman will still stay congealed to her broke boyfriend while leeching on a 7+ figure earning dude. Alright, it is hypergamy.

However, a man should know that if her woman behaves like this, it is not love but a lustful passion - Job's wife. Because like Job in the Holy Bible, true love endures pains, agony, wilderness, stress, darkness, and despondency and in the end comes out refined. True love is Sarah, following Abraham through thick and thin. True love is Job staying faithful to his God. Or, the disciples of Christ staying faithful to the gospel even unto martyrdom.

4. This myriad of attention from men makes them feel a sense of worth, howbeit, one is based on nothing and no achievement save beauty and physique. Their ego and entitlement mentality increases along this line because they feel that if they truly have nothing to offer why are men queuing up in their numbers just to have them? This is what I call the attention deceit: thinking you are important because of the circle of attraction towards you which is way similar to the Dunning-Kruger effect.

5. It is this attention deceit that has kept women where they are and not any patriarchal oppression. Being associated with a king doesn't make you king, queens are not kings. These women think they are like men or even better than men because men chase them 24/7 unrelenting - testosterone doing nature's work to the detriment of men who can't simply place their hands on their libido.

6. There is no possible way this rabbit hole can't lead us to CHOSEN VS COLD APPROACH. We are here again. If she chose you she won't list you among the numbers of tasty men who want a drip of her pvssy juice. She will want to protect you and her interest. Notwithstanding, with a good game, cold approaching can segregate you from the hordes.

7. Summarily, any woman that act this way, telling the world of the number of men that chase her (it may even be that some of these men just want to help her/friendship) is truly deluded, and has a low sense of worth, and should not be taken seriously. She's but for sexual gratification.

On the other hand, guys should calm down and look out for girls that show genuine interest in them, even if it is just 1 girl in a year or two...forget beauty and class, I know you will be judged by the kind of woman you are with especially when it comes to beauty and class, but women are lurking around to have you. Use these women as samples to experiment and understand women and up your game/life from there. She may even up her game because she wants to secure you.

The time you will use in chasing women around should be saved in doing something more productive. It is only through genuine interest a man can understand how far a woman can go when she's crazy in love. Dealing with the wrong women or chasing women all-around has its potential lessons, however, it comes with painful stings and is not enjoyable.

Without further ado: DAY 164, REDPILL 2022

Authority: Genuine desire.

Cc. AIhabaze, food is ready. Yummy!

Martinez39s:
... typing

Let's say you have read the The 48 Laws of Power. Someone who has read The 48 Laws of Power will have success implementing what he has read against others and even against you to some extent if you are unaware of his knowledge (sometimes we losen up and don't always analyse, read meaning into and suspect everything; and we don't remember vividly all we've read). However when that person tells you he/she has read the book, you become alert and might find yourself reading meanings in his/her action to see where he/she is possibly applying these laws... and you wouldn't want to fall for his/her "tricks (who would?). If the person has been pulling such moves on or plans to pull such, you are more likely to notice it. You see him/her in a slightly more machiavellian light than before, unlike when you thought he/she was a bit clueless and being honest in some of their actions. Sometimes, even when they are not pulling any "tricks" from that book and doing things honestly, you are still reading certain unnecessary intents to their actions and speeches. This analogy shows you additional effects (additional to the previous paragraph) of letting a woman know your source.

=================
The notable exceptions to my write-up are as follows:
(1) if she has no other options and your association with her is very beneficial (especially financially), you can leverage on this to make some rules and put her bullcraps in check. However, she will yield unwillingly because it ensures the benefits, but her pùssy won't get wet for you ever again. Showing her sexual best to you and doing the nasty stuffs —that she would have willing done to the alpha— will be unavailable to you; you are a turn-off.

If left to her, she would have distanced herself from you sexually and still want the benefits. The difference between you and the perceived natural alpha is that she yields to him of her own accord and readily makes herself available because he inspires genuine desire and her feelings are involved. Your leverage (the benefits) can only go so far.  Genuine desire can't be negotiated. To experience profound and maximum success in your new red pill awareness IN ALL ASPECTS, starting afresh is the only way.

(2) If you made all these mistakes as a little kid in school and many years elasped before you met again; you can create a new impression. If the simping was minimal and wasn't a big-time, blatant mistake, the better chances you have at correcting them.
========

I am not advocating divorce or the dissolution of your relationship. I am just reporting on how I see things. Even in marriage and relationships, there are things that you do that will irreversibly damage sexual attraction from your woman and level of respect as a alpha; despite this, relationships and marriages still continue despite the damaged because of financial benefits from the man, investments, convenience and diminished options. Heck, even betas are married to women who don't find them attractive and worthy of respect, but they move along because he has the benefits she married him for. A lot of husbands have lasting marriages, but they will never get to the sexual results and unalloyed lust from their wives that an alpha has gotten and can get from her. A woman's heart and pùssy can desire someone else, but she will endure a lifelong marriage if it benefits her.

I am just reporting as I know things are.

I welcome counter opinions; let's compare notes. I am forever opening to learning and reorientation.

Martinez39s:
^{NB: my write-up applies especially to spinning plates and maintaining rotation; you know, when it is all about lust and fùcks. To a good extent, it can also be applied to serious relationships and marriage since your respect, your frame and sexual attraction from your woman are important components of the dynamics.}

I might want to add some clarification for the sake of discussion. First of all, I COULD BE WRONG, sajmark was probably not referring to marriage; you know most people, even I, in this country use "relationship" and "marriage" differently. Na so e be for naija and some parts of the world even though marriage is also a relationship. That being said, l move to want to duscuss.

If you have been simping (especially big-time simping) to a woman; if you have been a confirmed beta to a woman; if you have defied certain red pill principles to the detriment of her attraction towards you (eg crying, telling her your emotional problems); and she has "seen you finish," your simp/beta status is indelibly registered in her psyche. It will be impossible for her to perceive you as an alpha again and yield positively to your red pill/alpha moves. When you try to make alpha moves, she sees you as a beta who is acting a borrowed script and trying to be what you are not; as a result, she will perceive that you are manipulatively playing a game on her or, precisely put, trying to play a smart one on her and cross your boundaries. Your new efforts will fail for two simple reasons:

(1)  Your past beta self has become your identity and innate personality to her so that it now comes across as unbelievable and fake when you gyrate like an alpha and make red pill/alpha moves. She won't buy it. You are forever a turn-off. You simply can't command from her the respect, willing compliance, genuine desire (aka lust), and sexual openness an alpha commands. This is why in order to experience profound and maximum success in your new red pill awareness in all these aspects, starting afresh is your best and easiest option. If you apply red pill newly with that female you have done all those beta, simpish and nonredpill stuffs for and it is not working, move along and don't stress yourself. Women plenty.

(2) Female ego naturally won't condone succumbing to what she perceives as tricks and fakery coming from a man she perceives as a simp and beta in and out. Women take glory in playing the simp/beta, not the other way round. Women are wired to only willingly succumb and yield sexually to the man who she thinks is naturally an alpha, a man who naturally "gets it" and who she thinks have alpha/red pill sharpness and qualities in his DNA and isn't faking it. This can be called a natural feminine fantasy since no man is natural endowed with red pill awareness at birth and such has to be acquired with experience and exposure. As a result of this, women will willingly give the pùssy to, yield to and break rules for the alpha guy in whom she has seen no traces simping and weakness. He, unlike the beta and simp, gets the utmost sexual openness and her hòe side without much effort and spending a penny... genuine desire (aka unalloyed lust). This is why first impression matters and would set the tone of the encounter. This is why in order to experience profound and maximum success in your new red pill awareness, starting afresh is your best option.

Remember, only alphas can succeed with alpha moves. Betas can't get away with or succeed in making alpha moves; they will meet failure and stiff resistance from females who have seen them as betas.

My point in (2) is the reason why some guys would have noticed something: when you are running game on women and things are going smoothly, everything goes south when she discovers that you are watching and reading red pill contents and materials. In her mind, she is like "He is probably a beta and not a born alpha who naturally "gets it, hence he depends on online help and tricks from others to teach it game and manly frame. He has probably been tricking me and faking it all along and he isn't a natural alpha." She would lose interest rather than risk being a "victim" of the tricks and fakery of a beta and simp; she wouldn't risk it or give you benefit of doubt as her ego is at stake.

This is why many redpillers will advice you to never tell a female you are gaming that you are learning and consuming red pill contents and materials (online or offline). Don't let her see you reading or watching them or find out by any means that you are consuming them. Seal your mouth from using terms that shows your are learning of consuming red pill. Hide your red pill books and sources. Instead, be silent about your red pill awareness and let your actions speak for you from the first impression so that it looks as if they come naturally to you. This will make things easier for you and, sometimes, even less likely for her to intercept, anticipate or be aware of what is going on while she is focused on dealing with the alpha. She won't fear any beta tricks since she thinks you are a natural and she will drop her guard and yield

Let's say you have read the The 48 Laws of Power. Someone who has read The 48 Laws of Power ....

typing....

ubunja:
the more brutal you are with women they more they come to you. Because as much as love is about romance and all that sweet stuff, the pussy only gets wet when dealing with a cold motherfucker. Be cold. You'll never starve for sex. Be romantic and you'll be friendzoned. Girls want romance but when they wanna marry but they wanna marry when they're done with the fvckers.

Stay sharp. Stay cold. Stay winning.

Martinez39s:
Unfortunately, many men will never learn. They think having millions of dollars is the cure all to every issue they could have with women from approaching women to having sex with any women they want to winning women's hearts and loyalty. What a grim misapprehension.
— Johnny Depp got burnt with Amber Heard (despite evidence coming out that Amber was the abuser, the media remains silent, Amber is still treated as the victim, and nothing has been done to recoup the damages done to Johnny by Amber's false accusations);
— Brad Pitt's riches didn't spear him;
— 52 year old Pamela Anderson, an advocate of men and four time divorcee with children, recently got married to 72 year old rich man Jon Peters after proposing to the rich simp foolish enough to wife a 50+ post wall thot. After 12 days, she ended the marriage when the simp paid off her $200,000 debt;
— Did Prince Harry's wealth make him alpha?

I could list many cases of brutal divorce rape among celebrities. Having money does not make one alpha. Riches just makes one a target. Riches makes one tantamount to a winning mega lottery ticket in the eyes of these höes. Many rich men's wife are cheating on them with the gate man, driver, his friends, brothers, strangers etc. Many rich men are raising kids that ain't theirs. Many rich simps are marrying used up products and single mothers. Being rich won't spare anyone from female nature and the blue pill mindset. Good luck to those that think riches will make them alpha. Many rich men are disgraceful simps.

Martinez39s:
Exactly!

A particular redpiller of YouTube once told a story of how he lost his job back then because during break, he drove all the way to fuçk a particular girl and arrived late at work. It is sexual incontinence that will make a lecturer put himself in a sex-for-mark scandal and tarnish his image all because of five-minute pleasure. Let's not talk about how many pastors it has put in trouble. I could write much more, but let me stop here.

It will always pass. Most times a lady is sexy and hot to a man just because the man is heavily barraged by konji. It after the sexual encounter that he experiences post-nut clarity and he realizes what a foòl he has been. Most times, the fantasy you have built up in your head about a lady and the assumptions you've made about how good you will enjoy her in bed is never met in reality; it is then men think "it wasn't as good as I hoped", "her puśsy stinks", "she is actually lazy in bed", "her pùssy isn't as tight as I thought", etc.

No one should be fooled that a man must release. No one should be fooled that it is impossible to effortlessly subdue your urges. I used to think like this, but I have proven myself wrong with practice. There is nothing there, the urges come and go.

Martinez39s:
I always tell guys to stop upgrading women and investing so much in them and their growth all in the name of romantic relationship. Women are not good investments in this regard, deal with it. Leave her at the level you found her, e her why; take what you want and shift her aside, simple. What men are usually looking for in relationships can be gotten without relationship so why single out one woman, accord more regard to her by committing to her, invest and spend on her and start doing serious boyfriend-girlfriend stuff for many months or few years? Kilode? What special and meaningful thing men usually think they have in relationships are usually lies, assumptions, illusions, blissful ignorance or overrated śhits.

That's just my take. I am mostly referring to conventional romantic relationships.

Martinez39s:
PART 2

WOMEN AND CHEATING (part a)

^{NB: any talk of pleasure, enjoyment or whatever is simply referring mainly to lust, and sexual fantasies in some aspects.}

Following the first part of my short write up, some would be inclined to ask "since we can't stop a woman from cheating if she wants to cheat, can't we find a woman who out of goodness and decency is guaranteed not to cheat? The good, decent girl who won't cheat?" This second lengthy write up will put you in a perspective where you can answer this question for yourself.

As a woman will invariably have her best interests take precedence over you, whatever bond you think you share, and whatever you have done for her in the past and present, so will she do with her sexual enjoyment, exploration and pleasure. These will be readily prioritised over whatever sanctity or regard for you which you think are intrinsic to your committed relationship. In this regard, female nature exempts no man; doesn't matter if you are a redpiller or not, simp or not. As a result, there is no man that cannot be cheated on.

Some men naively think there are women who sincerely say to themselves "this man has been good to me and he will continue to be good to me. He also provides well. Hence, out of my respect, appreciation, sanctity and/or regard for our relationship/marriage, I will close my legs and not utilise any SAFE, SECRET AND NONJUDGEMENTAL opportunity (that let me indulge all sorts of fantasies, pleasures and debauchery I want) to have sex with the guy who currently gets me in mood and who I think can pound me to my satisfaction, even better than my man does." lmao. Lori iro; female nature doesn't work like that. It doesn't happen. Things such as "I like/love him, therefore I will close legs and not have the fun I am opportuned and in the mood to have in secret while I keep my relationship/marriage." Such never happens. Even if you are the best provider and the most excellent husband/bf/father or you are the most knowledgeable and astute redpiller with a masculine frame made of adamantium, the same applies. Her sexual enjoyment, exploration and pleasure will take precedence over you and your deeds.

Even if she genuinely feels and treats you as the "love" of her life openly, it won't deter her from cheating. As much as people might want to think otherwise or intuitively think, even the respect and regard she has for you won't stop her from prioritizing her sexual enjoyment and pleasure over you and your deeds when the "iron is hot"; what RESPECT and REGARD do is that they ensure your woman takes extra steps to conceal her infidelity and shenanigans from you, and she will keep these things far away from you and be discreet so as not to get you upset or bring shame to you. This won’t make sense to many; it will sound counterintuitive because it seems natural to think that a woman who respects you will not cheat because she has regard for you, but female nature doesn't work like that. It is what it is. Don't let a woman's or simp's words make you think otherwise.

This is the reason why picking a woman from the gutters, helping her family in whatever way, and giving her a good life as a boyfriend or husband won't stop her from cheating on you with the available guy that is sexy, gets her in the mood and who she currently thinks can rock her world in bed if the opportunity presents itself and she can get away with it and still keep her relationship or marriage. This is the reason why a woman will have no problem sleeping with another guy in the apartment you bought for her if she can keep it a secret from you and still maintain the relationship/marriage for its benefits and security. If she can have the best of both worlds without any trouble, she will. What you have sacrificed or done for a woman does not guarantee fidelity the same way these won't stop her from monkey branching; no man is exempted from this.



Make sure you have it in mind that women are the prime self-centered UTILITARIANS of nature, most especially towards men in their dating strategy. That's nature. They put themselves first and are always after their best interests. Their best interests will always supercede what you have done for her in the past... the same applies to her pleasures and search for sexual novelties and fulfillment of her fantasies. Married or not, old or young, etc the same applies. What you have done as a guy, redpiller or not, and the sacrifices you have made cannot elicit sexual loyalty from a woman; your provision and resources only guarantee association with the woman (it's in her best interest to associate with you). It doesn't matter if you trained her (as a wife/gf) in school, gave your kidney to keep her (as a wife/gf) alive, or lost an arm to save her life; when she is in the mood and she is opportuned (as I explained), her pleasures, interests and satisfaction will take precedence over your past deeds. Your past deeds and the respect you command wouldn't stop her from seeking and eloping with a better option in the same way your past deeds and the respect you command wouldn't stop her from sampling a better diçk and exploring with that guy that gets her in the mood, regardless of the sanctity of her relationship/marriage.

The same way people believe woman can love them, as the blue pill suggests, is the same way people believe there are women who will give them sexual loyalty for whatever reason (eg. virtue from religion or culture, appreciation, respect, regard, sanctity of the relationship etc.) As a utilitarian, her association with you is based on benefit and your usefulness to her (Briffault's law). The sanctity of the relationship doesn't feed her or pay her bills or counts were it comes to prioritizing her best interests and sexual pleasures; how long the courtship/marriage is or how long you've known each other won't count when it comes to prioritizing her best interests and pleasures. The same applies to the vows, love promises and profession of love she made to you. If she can get the best of both worlds by getting "fun" in secret and reaping the benefits and security from being in a relationship/marriage with you, she will; she is getting her needs and wants, and that's all that matters.

Martinez39s:
The fact that this trick works on blue pill men shows something about men in their naivety: a man can love a woman despite her flaws as long as she is a decent and faithful human being at heart and he thinks she loves him as much as he loves her. But are women worth this compromise and delusion? Hell no! Never! Men ought to be realistic, have good standards, and ruthlessly put themselves first.

Being a Christian doesn't mean you should overlook a woman's past, marry a post-wall woman or get yourself saddled with a "retired" thot/sperm bucket, or single mom. Being a Christian doesn't mean you must get another man's scrap. No matter how Jesus forgives a thot, there is no requirement for you to marry that thot. So don't let rubbish talk to lead you astray. Don't blindly listen to any pastor who claims to have heard from the Spirit that a certain lady is your wife; do your investigation. If she turns out to have a sordid past or is a post-wall woman, ignore your pastor. A loving God won't serve his child a "retired" hoe or scrap.

Lastly, be careful of these religious girls, even the one that speaks in tongue. Anyone with a good little experience in life wouldn't see anyone, man or woman, in a favourable light just because they are religious or claim to be; take religious affiliation with a pinch of salt when judging people's moral uprightness and their dedication in following every rule in their holy book. I understand that people naturally judge from appearance. The religious girl that you think the Lord is leading you to or is decent is usually another man's hoe. As I have always said, one man's hoe, past or present, is someone else's nawalt somewhere. A Christian sister is somewhere accommodating d!ck while a Christian brother is somewhere thinking the Lord is leading him to her.

Martinez39s:
Impressive!

I am glad that people here are aware of how religion, particularly Christianity, can be weaponised to keep a man stuck in the matrix, make blue pill decisions, and fulfill the female imperative.

> "Thou shall not judge",
> "Anyone in Christ is a new creature, and old things have passed away",
> "Let anyone without sin cast the first stone",
> "Forgive, just as Christ forgave you"
> "No one is perfect. Everyone has a past"
> add yours

The above list has been used by "retired" hoes and the church to make blue pill men overlook the sordid past of these hoes. Please, say no to retired hòes, nonvirgins, single moms, infertile women, feministic women, post-wall women, etc. Don't let any church or religious chick, especially one who falls in any of these categories, use any of the aforementioned quotes to beguile you into settling with any of these types of women.

As the wall approaches, many women who have been hopping on d!cks during their younger years (and enjoying the company of bad boys) start trying to appear conservative, mature, and religious, and they plant their tents in churches hoping to fool and cuff a Christian brother with their religious/conservative affectations. Even when their pasts are told, under the pretence of regret, to these blue pill and simple men, these men are still exhorted or compelled to overlook the past using one of the quotes in my list. Since these quotes come from the bible, which is presumed to be the inspired word of the Almighty, these men think they are not doing anything wrong. SMH.

The thing that makes me angry is that this brutal trick and fraud depends on and exploits the inherent capacity of men to genuinely love a woman in the ideal sense. It also exploits a natural and understandable mistake that men who are yet to take the red pill make: they unknowingly project they capacity to love, reciprocate love, psyche and virtues on women. It takes what it is good in a man and uses it against himself. This is why the red pill is very important. It's a cold world out there, even religious institutions don't have your back as a man in the intersexual dynamics.

ubunja:
Okay, what I'm going to say will have many variables and question marks and holes,, but I'm just putting it out there to give a general idea of things. It must not be taken as a complete, ironclad theory or set of principles.

Bro you're on point on this.

Never invest in a woman because you're just improving her SMV (sexual market value). Which will activate her hypergamy. Keep her where you found her and use your money in such a way that if she disconnects from you and goes, she'll find herself where you found her.

There's a huge difference between marrying a beautiful woman whose hair, nails and makeup are top notch AND marrying a plain woman then making her beautiful with good hair, nails and makeup. The first is you getting what you deserve or can afford. While the second is you INVESTING in a woman - Which is what men must avoid. You can use your money to maintain a slay queen. But if you find an average girl and turn her into a slay queen then you're investing in her. Which will backfire spectacularly, Because after you're done with her, her SMV will be higher than when she started, which means she's now considering you BELOW HER - nevermind you yourself improved her said SMV.

Investing in a woman includes things improving a woman's education, helping her start her own business (which will inevitably lead to her independence from you) etc. You must keep her dependent. Supply her needs and wants without putting her in a position where she can replace you. She must not own anything but be happy. (Hard but not impossible) . You must be her provider, not investor. You can very well give a woman a good life, a nice home, fun trips and good experiences without investing in her. But just showing her how much you love her.

Pïmps mastered this game ages ago. They keep all the money but make sure their women get the best of anything - the best accommodation, the best food and the best outfits. The women get everything they ask for - except for cold hard cash. That's always a no. These pïmps even do the shopping on behalf of their women to stay ahead of the game. Cause give a woman cash, no matter how little - she'll find a way to grow it. It's their gift. Pïmps prevent this and keep cash away from women.

This may seem unfair, cruel or extreme in this day and age; but women do play the same game with men as regards to sex. A Woman always keeps a man dependent and relying on her and her alone for sex. A man is not allowed to even masturbate. If a married man services himself you'll hear all the wailings from women shaming him and demanding to know if his wife is not enough for him!! He'll be Condemned for destroying his wife's self-esteem and confidence. He must always get his sex from the wife. If she's not in the mood, he must wait for her. Not go elsewhere. Not even to a prostitute.

Now, because women are masters of the game, they monopolized the sex and also monopolized men's money:
Did not our elders, fathers and uncles hand over their own hard-earned money to their women, the WOMEN who would then give the men money bit by bit on a daily basis as the needs arise, eg every morning he's given transport money and every weekend he's given beer money. This was the norm a few generations ago in many places. This is how cunning women have been. Pïmps merely give women a taste of their own medicine - with brilliant results. It needs be that men start looking closely at how those flesh peddlers mastered women.

But many men are intent on achieving women's growth. They'll take a woman from the bottom and keep pouring money into her growth until she outgrows him. Then she leaves. Men are out here educating their wives, getting their women plastic surgery, buying investments and the like. Which is foolish.
All that money and effort and even plastic surgery must have been for themselves. For the men. To keep their own SMV ever so high. And yes I said it, men must not shy away from plastic surgery. If you've something about your face that you don't like, save money and go get it fixed. Leave the scratches and scars, they add to your masculine beauty. But that nose, that eye, those ears - get them fixed if you ain't happy. Same goes for teeth: if yours are discolored, go whiten them. If they're crooked, consider investing in braces to straighten them. If a front tooth is missing, move heaven and earth to replace it. All this may sound all too shallow and even feminine... But it will pay dividends. Cause combine this with the body game (gym) and you're an Adonis. women will come. And you won't be invested in any of them because you invested, instead, in yourself.

Iamolukorede:
Without many stories, I like to keep information poised and simple, we are here to help each other grow and also learn as we journey.
-
Not all problems are curses or come from your enemy, some of them come from your own hands 🙌 your greatest enemy is sometimes the enemy in you the greatest fight is to conquer your desires.
Below are habits that as the force to keep you poor.

You can also add yours to keep the idea going.
-
- overeating
2. doing drugs
3. over generosity
4. smoking
5. womanising
6. impulse buying
7. using internet data to gossip and idle away instead
of using it to make money
8. Buying lottery ticket 🎫 /betnija ticket
9. buying bottled water instead of filtered water
10. Patronising pornography websites
11. spending without a budget
12. Regularly eating out
13. Buying designer clothes instead of regular ones
14. Buying things you do not need just because they are on discounts
15. Attending aso - e bi party every weekend
16. keeping up with your neighbors.
17. Patronising money-focused churches 🛐
18. Alcoholism ( different from moderate intakes)
19. Buying coffee or tea at shops instead of making yours at home.
20. Constantly upgrading to the latest technology gadgets ( iPhones )
21. Buying apps when you can use them for free during trials.
22. Laundering your clothes when you can wash them yourself.

-
Add Yours.

Wotowotoman:
This one dey find okpo to nack as konji don nearly finish him life. Tomorrow now you go talk say na only virgin you wan marry and that modern women don spoil finish as dem dey nack up and down.

Bloody hypocrite just talk true say e dey pain you as the girls no dey look your side. Yamayama fall on that your face wey be like potopoto

Uptheante:
Oga, you copied & pasted my comment on the sexuality thread. Courtesy demands that you at least give me credit for that