₦airaland Forum

jeffrizzy1:
Your cerebellum is faulty,you lack balance.

COWARD!!!

hahahahahahahahaha relax sir, have a beer

Seun:
Ah ah people are not that stupid. Right?

apparently many are more stupid than that

alBHAGDADI:
The peaceful atheist are the ones who lost believe in any form of religion and decided to ignore religious folks whom they sometimes view as lost I. delusion. The good part is that they don't waste their time arguing about things they believe don't exist.

The radical atheist are the opposite of the above. They behave like children of the Satan the Christian Bible speaks of. They believe God doesn't exist, but are always seeing arguing and making mockery of something they believe doesn't exist. It's like making mockery of nothing or a man laughing because of nothing. Is that not madness? They have now become radicals cos they verbally attack Christians and their beliefs at every given opportunity. I hope we won't start seeing ISIS kind of atheism.

isn't it remarkably funny and speaks tons about atheists that to you radical atheism always is about people who are outspoken about their atheism and argue about it on the internet or offline.

-speak about radical muslims you think about Boko haram, ISIL, al queda and so many of them.

-speak about radical christianity you talk about Abortion clinic shooters, ku klux klan, christians of central africa republic and just about as many examples.

-but speak about radical atheism, its just a simple folk sitting behind his computer or offline, voicing his opinion and arguing to make his points...


now visualize this, think about it and take all the time you need.

Blogthug:
please stay focused on our chat, u are everywhere, or are u their leader? that question is meant for him to ask me to prove it lol

just bring on the arguments and stop this digressing rigmaroles

Blogthug:
I just showed that your logic is flawed sorry u couldn't grasp it, absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, this is primary school logic nau lol

lol that is another way of saying i cannot hope to prove the negate that no cup is on that table - absence of evidence not evidence of absence is a mantra we hear everyday.

your task was simple, prove the negate, prove there is no cup on that table... stop jumping up and down.

we are heading to page 3 yet no argument presented, i am still patiently waiting for one

Blogthug:
I do actually, God exists

that is not an argument but just your opinion now kindly regale us the thrilling arguments in support of this opinion which you have provided none yet.

till then what he said stances - You have no argument

Blogthug:
are concepts nothing or something?

concepts are basically ideas, child of the human mind.

Blogthug:
lol primary school logic,

lacking evidence for a red cup is never evidence for No cup , observations contrary to what is expected if a red cup exists is evidence for No cup, I know this will be hard take time to understand it

you think so high of yourself even when you appear so puerile, we are yet to get a compelling proof that there is no red cup on that table - state these observations and reconcile them as proof of no cup on that table

reminder - page 2, yet no argument

Blogthug:
if u can't grasp a simple analogy, there is no point discussing with you, meet others for notes later

Just admit that you pulled a very nasty flop, there is no two description of nature that contradicts either in principle or essence, so you gave a very wrong analogy... give us conflicting description of nature from these supposed scientists you talked about.

Blogthug:
u write very long trash , now answer me

hahahahahahaha we are getting somewhere

Is God something or nothing?

i dont think there is God so just like a unicorn god can be said to be nothing more than a concept. why not you that argues for God define God and we will take on that from the principle of your definition.

Blogthug:
most of them are ignorant of basic logic, imagine a free thinker saying stuff like " u can't prove a negative claim " lol they don't know that by logic that statement is itself a Negative claim , which means it cannot be proven. I can't start teaching everyone now, will take years so I'd let some slide, I know where I'm going

example - "prove there isn't a red cup on this table" adepeter26 watch closely, he will evade and dodge

Blogthug:
listen here young man, saying you can't prove a negative claim by logic is itself a negative claim, so it cannot be proven, think deeper bro, u boring me lol

no argument yet - page two already

Blogthug:
even if that's a baby logic let me let that slide.

evasion and i will not have that - you have hit a wall today and no running away from it, you should asked before engaging me.

i am teaching you a lesson in your own game, there is a red cup on that table, please prove there isn't [ i thought you are good at asking proof for the negate, now chew on your own gum]

now my prove for God's existence is because Nothing does not exists

another classical example of saying my proof of tree fairies are trees. it doesn't work that way, you can't just point at an unrelated subject as proof of your opinion without deriving a compelling argument to bridge these subjects. i am still waiting for your argument.

Blogthug:
if u don't know that u can prove a negative by now, I think u should drop out of this argument,

perhaps a good analogy is best to teach you this basic tenet of an argumentative discussion.

Mr A: i have a diamond ball
Mr B: I don't believe you do
Mr A: prove that i don't !
this is a classical example of what you are doing here, asking people to prove your own unproven propositions which is both nonsensical and consonant with the simple rules of argument

a better scenario should be

Mr A: i have a diamond ball
Mr B: i don't believe you do
Mr A: here it is [shows his diamond ball]

I don't need slow people sorry,

failing your own rules yet again - this is a good example of an unnecessary ad hominem

better yet google it!

why not just show us and leave google out of it, i thought you are extremely intelligent

Blogthug:
listen, I don't have time for your strawman, this argument is about Theism Vs Atheism not atheism Vs a particular religion, stay focused. God is defined as the creator of the universe and origin of life, prove God doesn't exist

you are already failing in simple tenets of argument. You cannot make a proposition and ask someone who doubts your proposition to prove the negate.

the onus is on your who asserts the existence of a God to prove this not the person who doubts it.

now to demonstrate, there is a red cup on the table {image attached} now prove there isn't

Blogthug:
lol, let me let that slide, now, my argument, Do you agree that everything exists? yes or no

when you say everything, what do you mean by that?

everything possible or everything that can be or are you referring to what is as everything?

and things exist not necessarily everything

Blogthug:
prove it!

is this the argument you promised? how exactly are you going to convince any atheist with this puerile talks.. proving a negate, christ.

Blogthug:
pls try to answer my question directly , do u believe it's not a belief? u said u know the universe exists, and it's not a belief and I asked, do u believe it's not a belief? it's a logical question

read this mesh of nonsense one more time, slowly... and please bring your argument, this thread is already on the second page yet not a single argument from you.

Blogthug:
strawman, I said Describe , please read properly

haaaaaaay Jesus..... there still are no contradicting descriptions of nature either in principle or essence so you still have no case with this.

Blogthug:
it makes a lot of sense, remember I specified Capital letter G, the capitalization is important, it denotes a different category of being with ability to create /cause the universe , get it?

it doesn't make any sense what so ever because even using nature for example. using capital N and small n doesn't give the word any special meaning than it already has.

so far you have not brought up any argument just dragging over capital G and small g, i still patiently await your arguments.

Blogthug:
do u believe it's not a belief?

jesus. there is a difference between belief and knowledge. something certain and sure cannot be said to be belief a belief while a belief on the other hands bears a stinging mark of uncertainty.

Blogthug:
it's like a scientist asking another scientist " which nature exists ? " nature is nature and God is God, though no two scientists will describe Nature same way, so as no two religion will describe God same way , get it?

there is no two definition of nature that differ or contradict each other in principle or essence so this comparison makes no sense at all.

Blogthug:
do u believe nothing exists?

lol i already see where this is going - lets roll with it..

i know the universe exist, i know many things exist - it's not a belief.. so?

it is obvious that apostle suleiman is desperate, i mean take a look at the shameful clown show the man and his wife is pulling off, they are just trying too hard

Blogthug:
capital G, which I will define as Creator of universe and origin of life, any deity that's defined this way fits to be called God, eg Allah, Brahman, Yahweh

do you think it makes any difference to spell dog with capital D or small d.. the letter makes no difference here.

Blogthug:
OK Do u believe God exists?

no i don't

male God, male angels, male jesus and holy spirits, male apostles and all - heaven sounds more like a gay get together

Blogthug:
agreed! just God's existence, u game?

i am game ....

let me officially register my presence.. let's discuss.. hahn

Niflheim:
@the general house,

I hope you are aware of this!!! The Atheists Society of Nigeria has finally been registered by the Corporate Affairs Commission!!! The President is Calistus Igwilo(I do not know him personally, but he is very visible on Facebook)!!!

i don't think i fancy the idea of an atheistic organization. . .

hahn:
hmmmmm

Is god really worth the stress?

fun