₦airaland Forum

Ptolomeus: Exactly.
Only a blind or a fan does not see that ...
My respects!

hehehehehehehehehehehehehe
*grabs guguru and epa,watching as things unfold*

brainpulse: [b][/b]

This is the last time i will reply to your post, i believed you are very intelligent but i can now see.

So if you are seeking the truth you dont make reference to the source of the truth. You dont measure and prove the truth against all odds without making reference to a logical fact that can dissaprove the truth. Whao so how can you be so confident about an information when you are not bothered about the source bro. In case you have not done any project work or research before, You make reference to the source of the fact/ truth you are quoting and before you disapprove any truth you must have superior knowledge and proveable facts."WIHOUT WHICH HEAD KNOWLEDGE IS NOT ADMISSIBLE IN CONTEXT".

The truth about God is only found in the book written by great inspired men and most of what was written down had being provened by acheological discoveries and research. So for some one to do a writeup on the internet then i must be a fool to believe that, if he has no proveable source.

Head knowledge can not be use to understand and explain the bible we have told you countless times, because you do not know the begining and ending of God's wisdom so for you to understand His thoughts you must seek him in spirit and in truth. The more you use head knowledge, you will be confused and come out with errors and ambigous thoughts, thinking its the bible.

You sound pathetic.go through the post again and stop embarrasing yourself.you do not need the holy spirit to understand the word of God.the word of God is simple and easy to understand.that is why christians are prey to fraudster marsking as mog.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]This is simply a very poor attempt at falsifying a prophecy. You and I both know that strict literality is not criteria for falsifying prophecy. For instance; if I said that you will have have your hands pierced and your clothes sold, it is irrelevant how exactly your hands came to be pierced or how exactly your clothes came to be sold. What matters is that your hands are indeed pierced and your clothes sold. Your rebuttal is laughably poor plus I'm convinced it's a terrible copy-paste job[/quote]Hehehehehehhehehehe.
That prophecy aint about jesus,it is evident that christiandoom tried to reconcile jesus alledged suicide to psalms 22.there are obvious fall outs and loop holes.hehehehehehehehehehehehehe

brainpulse: Mr. Man I don't blieve in what you believe. And what you believe is not near what I believe. Your judgement about truth and falsehood is based on your personal perception of the information you are exposed to and your level and ability of interpreting things. You cant interprete or solve a FOURIER SERIES equation in advanced engineerinng Mathemeties if you'r still battling with 3x3 simulteneous equation. So it is laughable to say its an error what you cant comprehend. Quran has no fundamental fucrum to judge what has existed before it was written nor decide to extract what will support its religious ego and still paint it false. Is it not rediculous? LO. The power behind the name of Jesus works when the user believes in the efficacy of the name. So call the name 1billion times, it wont work for you. Only Believe.

Those who sincerely and earnestly seek the truth should not really
care about its source.what should matter most to them is if, in fact
it is truth. As an example, does it matter if the truth about God is
found in the Bible, Qur’an , Torah, Vedas, Avesta e.t.c.? No! What
should matter is if such a source reflects observable truth- and our
generation certainly possesses the yardstick to use in evaluating the veracity of any such claim.

teewai27: The name of Jesus is a strong tower, the righteous run to it and they are saved.

Key word here being "righteous". We are made righteous by our faith. So if you don't believe in the name of Jesus, it won't work wonders for you. Its plain and simple.

phillipians 2:10 is clear.hehehehehehehehe

[quote author=Mr_Anony]perhaps the miracle is that it wasn't cured by tablets[/quote]stomach ache is curable.hehehehehehehehe.

hmmmmmmmmmmm
interesting.

[quote author=itunu_07]Arrant nonsense...absolute gibberish!!!!!!!!!.....
Fools..[/quote]to you,cos you are blind to see the truth.
Open your eyes.hehehehehehehehehehehehehe

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Good, now if you read that psalm, you must have also read verses 16 to 18

.........The congregation of the wicked has enclosed Me. They pierced My hands and My feet; I can count all My bones. They look and stare at Me. They divide My garments among them, And for My clothing they cast lots...........
notice how that chapter which was written by David about a thousand years before Christ was born describes in detail the agony of Christ on the cross.

God assures us that He will never forsake us. When I am suffering and I call out to God like that, it means that I believe that He will do what He promised even though I cannot presently see it else I won't even bother calling out to Him in the first place.
What Christ - and consequently all Christians - have with the Father is a relationship of love and not one of servitude so when we feel lost and alone, we call out to our father in our pain and He hears us.
That was what Christ did on the cross. It is never blasphemy to call out to your father when you are in danger.

(Of course, there is even more meaning to that verse if you can bear it, but I'll leave it at this for now)[/quote]psalms 22 speaks of a man who
is despised and mocked by the
people, who suffers from thirst,
who has been cut all over, who
has pierced hands and feet and
who is near death. He feels he can count all his bones. People
are casting lots for his clothes. Alleged Fulfilment. The crucifixion of Jesus Christ. New Testament Interpretation. This may be accepted by John
(19) for he said the bit about the
casting lots was about Jesus but
then John used a verse right after
that (19:36) that was taken out of
context so perhaps he believed that the psalms only contained
bits about Jesus and that the
context did not mean anything.
Matthew weaves passages from
this psalm into his narrative but
this means nothing. Hebrews 2 cites a verse from the Psalm as if
it were spoken by Jesus but it
does not say that it was about the
crucifixion of Jesus or that the
whole psalm was about Jesus. It
is possible that the same holds true for John. Never does the
Bible use the entire psalm as a
prophecy of Jesus. The Truth. It could be describing a severe beating. The man can
number his bones for he can feel
in them in the pain. They have
pierced his hands and his feet
probably to prevent him from
walking to get help and using his hands after the attack. Jesus could easily have cut his own hands and feet if he had got a
beating to fulfil this prophecy. Christians contend that something
very bad happened then when they were singled out for a
mention. But that may have just been because of their
importance. If Jesus wore good clothes on his final journey it would have
ensured that the soldiers would try to win them in a game of
casting lots. If the gospels did not mention the casting lots and it
never happened Christians would be saying that it did happen. Had it been a real prophecy, we would be reading in the gospels
that Jesus went out in poor clothes and these were ripped off him
and valuable ones put on and for those better clothes the soldiers
cast lots. Then it would have been harder for Jesus to fulfil the
prophecy. Here is proof that the psalm is not about Jesus. The man says he cries in the day and the night and is hated by all
and they pierce his hands and feet and cast lots for his clothes.
This shows the suffering is in the context of something that lasted
longer than what Jesus went through, three hours on the cross.
When a man says he cries day and night and God does not hear
and he is in jail he means or most probably means that he was in jail all that time. It is the same with the Psalmist and especially the
Psalmist because he uses the one tense until he turns to the future
tense at v22. Verse 8 says that the persecutors yelled that the Psalmist trusted
in and delights in the Lord. This is supposed to predict the Jews
sneering at Jesus and saying he could save others but not himself
and that God would not help him. But the Jews never
complemented Jesus on his trust and joy in the Lord. They always
accused him of being thoroughly bad news and a practitioner of deceitful magic and satanic magic. They would not have praised
him for they wanted to be seen as better than him. Verse 11 asks God to be near for there is nobody to help. Jesus
did not want any help and refused to try and hide when he was
about to be arrested. During his trial he deliberately upset and
provoked the High Priest and Pilate and would not defend himself. Verse 12-4 says that the person is hedged in or imprisoned and
that is why he is thirsty. Jesus was offered drink before he was
crucified and he would not take it. A man deliberately making
himself thirsty on the cross to emulate the Psalmist could be
nothing else but a fake fulfiller. Prophecies are supposed to be
beyond fabricating. When the Psalmist puts the thirst before the wounding of the
hands and the feet it strongly suggests that the wounding was not
the reason for the thirst. But crucifixion causes thirst. It is
suspicious that Jesus only asks for a drink just as he is about to die
(John 19:28) which means either that he had already drank enough
or that the story was made up for he would have been desperate long before that. The Psalm never mentions death and just says that the Psalmist
nearly died (v 15). A prophecy about Jesus would not omit such
an important detail. Verse 20 has the author asking for
deliverance from the sword and the power of the dog which is the
person who is trying to kill him. It is fantasy to say that this is
deliverance from death by means of the resurrection for it most probably means rescue – remember, never interpret something as
meaning supernatural when it could mean natural. And especially
when there is no hint of resurrection anywhere in the Psalms.
Jesus was not killed by the sword but by the cross. Jesus, if good, would not think of his attackers as dogs like the
Psalmist did. First of all, Luke says he forgave them for they did
not know what they did. Secondly, the gospels say that Jesus was
at his holiest during his passion. Thirdly, the gospels exculpate the
Romans who crucified Jesus and say the Jews forced them. The dogs reference proves that the passage about the pierced
hands and feet is symbolic. The passage is actually saying that
since the author is surrounded by dogs they are tearing holes in
his hands and his feet – he is using the image of dogs biting him.
He is trying to defend himself with his hands and feet and the
dogs are making at them for they are his weapons. The passage is poetry. The present tense in the original Hebrew says they are at
his hands and feet which is proof that is not referring to Jesus
because the Hebrew actually does not mention piercing at all –
that is something that the translators assume the Hebrew means.
They imagine that it is implied. But it is not implied for dogs being
at you does not necessarily mean you are being bitten by them. (See www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/bp/890/
interpretation.html.) Others see that the Hebrew says “like a lion at my hands and feet”
meaning mauled. The Christians just assume the piercing and
translate it as piercing to trick people into thinking the nailing of
Jesus is meant (Challenging the Verdict, The Fabulous Prophecies of
the Messiah by Jim Lippard). In our tradition, the Psalmist had no strength at all and compared
it to a fragment of clay pottery and for emphasis and his tongue
was stuck to his mouth with weakness and thirst (v15) BEFORE he
said he was being pierced. But Jesus was able to yell just before
he died AFTER he was pierced so he was not that weak. If the
Psalmist was predicting Jesus’ experience, he was disputing the authenticity of the gospels. Christians make the prophecy seem more convincing when they
say it is not chronological. For example, the pierced hands and
feet should have been spoken of first and then the thirst if the
prophecy was about crucifixion for after being nailed and hung up
the person gets very thirsty. But a prophecy worth its salt would
be chronological. For example, if I predict that President X of the USA will get married and have one child and visit Ireland and then
suffer tragically and only one thing comes true, his marriage, then
somebody could say that the visit to Ireland happened before he
became President and the one child refers to the boy he had
before he became President and the tragic suffering happened
when his friend died when he was ten. The credibility of the prophecy is undermined. If I really know the future I will be able
to get the order correct. The composer is on about his own experiences for and to say he
was not is to abuse the scriptures for only express prophecies
have the right to be considered.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]have you read psalm 22 yet?[/quote]just did.
1st samuel 12:22 stated clearly that God will never forsake his people.to utter such statement as jesus did is disbelieve.he never trusted God.God never break promises
hehehehehehehehehe

brainpulse: What is your definition of the truth? Is it when it suits you or when you are comfortable with it. What is the difference btw a chemistry textbook and a Quran? They all tend to speak the truth to those that use it, though one is proveable while the other is believeable.
To you, you believe so much about what your quran told you and that is your truth and if it works for you, fine. But you can't comprehend the words of God (pls not allah) with your human brain, because they where all inspired and of the same meaning to the spiritual man but will remain a point of controversy to the physical man.
You cant understand spiritual things, that is the reason why we are different and can never serve the same God and the name of Jesus may not work for you. there is no need to argue about this, you believe in Mohammed, Mohammed serves Allah and it works for you. We believe in Jesus the savior our God and He works for us. So we dont serve the same God and no need to argue about it.
You have a different parent and I have mine.

dude i just pointed out lies enshrined in the bible.its your duty to seperate truth from falsehood,as a sincere believer.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]It is not blasphemy at all. You may want to read Psalm 22:1, it says: "My God, my God why hast thou forsaken me......."
In fact read the whole of psalm 22 and compare it with Jesus' crucifixion.
Contrary to blasphemy, you will see a fulfillment of prophecy.[/quote]jesus is being regarded as a pious and righteous person.
And God made a convenant to be with his people and never
forsake them.
1 Samuel 12:22 For the LORD will not forsake his people for his
great name's sake: because it hath pleased the LORD to make you
his people. 1 Kings 6:13 And I will dwell among the children of Israel, and will
not forsake my people Israel. But mathew 27:46 clearly is a blasphemy from jesus according to
the bible.this is a great insult as such words would come from
unbelievers in God,further it is incredible that such words should
come out from a prophet of God.God never breaks his promise.

mincuu: i saw d post and decided to share a testimony.. brother, the beautiful name of Jesus just healed me of a stubborn stomach problem..

do you know what miracle really is?

Dude miracle is An event that appears inexplicable by the laws of nature and so is
held to be supernatural in origin or an act of God:
ur stomach ache can be cured by tablets.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]It is not blasphemy at all. You may want to read Psalm 22:1, it says: "My God, my God why hast thou forsaken me......."
In fact read the whole of psalm 22 and compare it with Jesus' crucifixion.
Contrary to blasphemy, you will see a fulfillment of prophecy.[/quote]

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Please show an example of Jesus blaspheming .......and sorry we won't base it on the quran because the quran came much later. We will base it on the Jewish Torah which is what was known of God at the time. Do you agree?[/quote]jesus is being regarded as a pious and righteous person.
And God made a convenant to be with his people and never forsake them.
1 Samuel 12:22 For the LORD will not forsake his people for his
great name's sake: because it hath pleased the LORD to make you
his people. 1 Kings 6:13 And I will dwell among the children of Israel, and will
not forsake my people Israel.

But mathew 27:46 clearly is a blasphemy from jesus according to the bible.this is a great insult as such words would come from unbelievers in God,further it is incredible that such words should come out from a prophet of God.God never breaks his promise.

[quote author=Abd'Hafeez]If any of you christians can convince me that the Bible is the word of God and Jesus is the son of God(Astagfurllah),I will convert.[/quote]heheheheeheheheheheheheheheh
its like riding bicycle to mars.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]Lol, How can anyone convince you when you have already decided not to be convinced? No matter the verse I show you, all you will say is that the verse isn't really what Jesus said for no better reason other than you simply don't agree with it.

For instance if I said grass is not green and that only brown grass is real grass, how can you convince me that grass is actually green?



Your choice is completely biased towards the quran. How do you know that the quran is indeed more accurate and the true word of God? How do you know for sure that Jesus blasphemed and prophesied falsely in the bible?[/quote]i know that the quran is more accurate,because it is free from errors,discrepencies.unlike the bible.
Jesus blasphemed according to the bible,jesus made false and unfulfilled prophecy in the bible.
Its all written in the bible.

[quote author=Mr_Anony]All you've really said is "I choose to believe only what I want to believe from the bible and accept the quran wholly" I.e Jesus according to the bible is not true but Jesus according to the quran (which was written 600 years later) is more accurate. For this claim, you have no better reason other than you just believe it to be true.
Anyway, which of the gospels would you consider to be an undoctored account of Christ?[/quote]my choice is simple and unbiased.
Because the quran is more accurate.there are blasphemous staments credited to jesus,failed and false prophecy credited to him.

tomakint: I don't seems to get it why this doctrine has generated so much confusion even in Christendom! My take has always been God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are three distinct (separate) Supernatural Beings United in Agreement of purpose, vision, spirit and the likes and not what I hear around that they are actually three entity in one unified body all in the name of - its a MYSTERY! when the BIBLE clearly states the supremacy of God the Father over and above all as attested to by our LORD JESUS CHRIST! Please what is your take on this?

None of the Bible’s Writers Believed That Jesus is God: Christians and Muslims both believe in Jesus, love him, and honor him. They are, however, divided over the question of his divinity. Fortunately, this difference can be resolved if we refer the question to both the Bible and the Quran, because, both the Bible and the Quran teach that Jesus
is not God. It is clear enough to everyone that the Quran denies the divinity of Jesus, so we do not need to spend much time explaining that. On the other hand, many people misunderstand the Bible; they feel that the belief in Jesus as God is so widespread that it must have come from the Bible.
This article shows quite conclusively that the Bible does not teach that. The Bible clearly teaches that Jesus is not God. In the Bible God is always someone else other than Jesus. Some will say that something Jesus said or something he did while on the earth proves that he is God. We will show that the disciples never came to the
conclusion that Jesus is God. And those are people who lived and walked with
Jesus and thus knew first hand what he said and did. Furthermore, we are told in
the Acts of the Apostles in the Bible that the disciples were being guided by the
Holy Spirit. If Jesus is God, surely they should know it. But they did not. They
kept worshipping the one true God who was worshipped by Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (see Acts 3:13). All of the writers of the Bible believed that God was not Jesus. The idea that Jesus is God did not become part of Christian belief until after the Bible was
written, and took many centuries to become part of the faith of Christians. Matthew, Mark, and Luke, authors of the first three Gospels, believed that Jesus was not God (see Mark 10:18 and Matthew 19:17). They believed that he
was the son of God in the sense of a righteous person. Many others too, are
similarly called sons of God (see Matthew 23:1-9). Paul, believed to be the author of some thirteen or fourteen letters in the Bible, also believed that Jesus is not God. For Paul, God first created Jesus, then
used Jesus as the agent by which to create the rest of creation (see Colossians
1:15 and 1 Corinthians 8:6). Similar ideas are found in the letter to the Hebrews,
and also in the Gospel and Letters of John composed some seventy years after
Jesus. In all of these writings, however, Jesus is still a creature of God and is
therefore forever subservient to God (see 1 Corinthians 15:28). Now, because Paul, John, and the author of Hebrews believed that Jesus was God’s first creature, some of what they wrote clearly show that Jesus was a pre-
existent powerful being. This is often misunderstood to mean that he must have
been God. But to say that Jesus was God is to go against what these very authors
wrote. Although these authors had this later belief that Jesus is greater than all
creatures, they also believed that he was still lesser than God. In fact, John
quotes Jesus as saying: “...the Father is greater than I.” (John 14:28). And Paul declares that the head of every woman is her husband, the head of every man is
Christ, and the head of Christ is God (see 1 Corinthians 11:3). Therefore, to find something in these writings and claim that these teach that Jesus is God is to misuse and misquote what those authors are saying. What they
wrote must be understood in the context of their belief that Jesus is a creature of
God as they have already clearly said. So we see then, that some of the later writers had a higher view of Jesus, but none of the writers of the Bible believed that Jesus is God. The Bible clearly
teaches that there is only one true God, the one whom Jesus worshipped (see
John 17: 3). In the rest of this article we will explore the Bible in more depth, and deal with the passages which are most often misquoted as proofs of Jesus’ divinity.
We will show, with God’s help, that these do not mean what they are so often
used to prove. 2) Evidence From the Acts of the Apostles: Jesus performed many miraculous wonders, and he without doubt said a lot of wonderful things about himself. Some people use what he said and did as a
proof that he was God. But his original disciples who lived and walked with him,
and were eyewitnesses to what he said and did, never reached this conclusion. The Acts of the Apostles in the Bible details the activity of the disciples over a period of thirty years after Jesus was lifted up to heaven. Throughout this
period they never refer to Jesus as God. They continually and consistently use
the title God to refer to someone else other than Jesus. Peter stood up with the eleven disciples and addressed the crowd saying: “Men of Israel, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to
you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as
you yourselves know.” (Acts 2:22). It was God, therefore, who did the miracles through Jesus to convince people that Jesus was backed by God. Peter did not see the miracles as proof that Jesus
is God. In fact, the way Peter refers to God and to Jesus makes it clear that Jesus is not God. For he always turns the title God away from Jesus. Take the following
references for example: “God has raised this Jesus...” (Acts 2:32) “God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.” (Acts 2:36) In both passages, the title God is turned away from Jesus. So why he did this, if Jesus was God? For Peter, Jesus was a servant of God. Peter said: “God raised up his servant...” (Acts 3:26). The title servant refers to Jesus. This is clear from a previous passage where Peter declared: “The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus.” (Acts 3:13). Peter must have known that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob never spoke of a Triune God. They always spoke of God as the only God. Here, as in Matthew
12:18, Jesus is the servant of God. Matthew tells us that Jesus was the same
servant of God spoken of in Isaiah 42:1. So, according to Matthew and Peter,
Jesus is not God, but God’s servant. The Old Testament repeatedly says that God
is alone (e.g. Isaiah 45:5). All of the disciples of Jesus held this view. In Acts 4:24 we are told that the believers prayed to God saying: “...they raised their voices together in prayer to God. ‘Sovereign Lord,’ they said, ‘you made the heaven and the earth and the
sea, and everything in them.’” It is clear that the one they were praying to was not Jesus, because, two verses later, they referred to Jesus as “...your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed.” (Acts 4:27). If Jesus was God, his disciples should have said this clearly. Instead, they kept preaching that Jesus was God’s Christ. We are told in Acts: “Day after day, in the temple courts and from house to house, they never stopped teaching and
proclaiming the good news that Jesus is the Christ.” (Acts 5:42). The Greek word “Christ” is a human title. It means “Anointed.” If Jesus was God, why would the disciples continually refer to him with human titles like
servant and Christ of God, and consistently use the title God for the one who
raised Jesus? Did they fear men? No! They boldly preached the truth fearing
neither imprisonment nor death. When they faced opposition from the
authorities, Peter declared: “We must obey God rather than men! The God of our fathers raised Jesus...” (Acts 5:29-30). Were they lacking the Holy Spirit? No! They were supported by the Holy Spirit (see Acts 2:3, 4:8, and 5:32). They were simply teaching what they had
learnt from Jesus — that Jesus was not God but, rather, God’s servant and Christ

[quote author=Mr_Anony]@justaqad and Abd'Hafeez, Do you believe in everything Jesus said?[/quote]in the bible 50% in the quran 200%

brainpulse: It is inspired by the Creator or Heaven and earth. We dont live by the letters but by the life that the word produces- Meaning real christians dont just read the letters,we hear the word from the bible as interpreted by the creator of heaven and earth.
There is more to the bible than what you see or think and that, you will never understand till then it will be like a novel and just a book; like the name of Jesus you guys are talking about. That is the reason why we dont have to kill for his name

.

Seems you are only a church goer.
Read the bible dude.

[quote author=Abd'Hafeez]The name of Jesus is powerless and there are proofs in your own Bible! The Holy bible has been doctored and revised by men of the world and that has made it impure.I have proofs of those too
Christians! One question. Who wrote the bible.
Im not here to fight with anybody.lets rub mind like gentlemen and women.
Justaqad,Jazak'Allah khair.[/quote]ramadan kareem brother.when they face defeat they claim,you lack the holy spirit to understand the scripture.i wonder who is inspiring most controversial topics by influencial MOG?
Some say tb joshua is fake,others believe he is a prophet.same as pastor chris,dr sign fireman.they all claim to be in possesion of the spirit.
Hehehehehehehehe

[quote author=itunu_07]Stop lookn 4 sm1 Τ̅☺ disaprove ur claims cos dey sound really stupid..ℓ☺ℓ ..ur opinion simply shws off ignorance  closd mindednedd** pls tell ur imam Τ̅☺ stop prechinh the bible Τ̅☺ u guys abi una quaran no reach una again??lolzzz..[/quote]heheehhehehehehhehehehehehe.christianity(religion without men)psycho.

[quote author=itunu_07]Trust ε̲̣̣̣̥ u D̶̲̥̅̊☺n̶̲̥̅̊'t ncessrili need Jesus Τ̅☺ av ɑ̤̥̈̊ nice life ..

Even atheists, witches... selfs av nice lives
Satn cn gv u ɑ̤̥̈̊ nice life bt robb u of etrnity.. Only Jesus can give eternal life ..☀̤̣̈̇ː̖́ onli time will tell*
Wow...Α̲̅♍ so proud of my confdience..gusshh..


Lastly Christians ar nt brainwashd oo.. If nt dere will b only one chrh doctrine dt evry one follows.. Dts y dere Is S̶̲̥̅Ơ̴̴̴̴̴̴͡ much controversies nd disgremnt... No one can force anione Τ̅☺ bliv anitin..u J̲̥̅̊u̶̲̥̅̊s̶̲̥̅̊t̲̥̅̊ interprete. practce wt u av undrstood i̶̲̥̅̊n̶̲̥̅̊ ur bible..
Aldou.all christines round thE world despite diffce i̶̲̥̅̊n̶̲̥̅̊ chrch doctrines  mode of worship, prech the MST imprtant Doctrine, the doctrine of Christ wch Is holliness, righteousness, sanctification, repentance frm dead works,  rebirth,  salvation .. Απϑ that Is wt makes one ɑ̤̥̈̊ Christian  guarantees eternity.. Evry odr doctrine Is only profitable for man[/quote]and what makes you think you are heaven bound?thank God u said there are so much controversies in christianity.controversies emanating from different intepretation by the holy spirit.hehehehehehehe.why would the holy spirit cause so controversy in christianity?islam is a religion of peace.few of its adherents are extremist.islam does not support killing of innocent.
Lastly,this is my belief.
isaiah 43:10: “You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord, “and my servant whom I have chosen, that
you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was
formed, nor shall there be any after me

Logicbwoy: I hope that you realise that you're sounding crazy right now

hehehhehehehehehehehehehe.

Logicbwoy: Yes. I am logicboy/macdaddy

remember i said i was expecting a visit from holy spirit?
I actually got a surprise visit.hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.i believe you must have been visited,cos i gave em ur address.i am gonna post it later.

Logicbwoy: Good

i have something really great i will like to share with you.but first of all are you the same logicboy,aka macdaddy?

salam brother usisky.
I applaud your courage and conviction,but there are areas we might lockhorns.mind if we chat offline.
U can reach me on justaqad@gmail.com.
P.s its a decoy,drop ur message i will get back to you asap.

Logicbwoy: What is the need for the hadith if the Quran is perfect and complete?

the quran is indeed perfect and complete.
As stated in the holy quran.that is the reason people like usisky dont dont believe the hadith.

most muslims have been fed with so many lie about islam emanating from the hadith.but i realised quran is the only guidance any muslim should seek,cos Allah has promised to guard it.
But i seriously find it hillarious why he would delete your posts,since they are all quranic.hmmmmmmm.

*anxiously waiting*

iv4fb: @justaqad. Don't sound pathetic, where's the insult? I guess you prefer arabic, unfortunately english is our lingua franca. Do you even know the meaning of insults? Tell me one statement that I've made that you consider as insult, but you'll have to prove its false first.

You calling Jesus powerless is not an insult, right? Drawing cartoons of ur leader is sufficient for ur people to start killing people.

Btw, how old are u? U seriously need to grow up.

You kept repeating Jesus is powerless over and over again. What if I say mohammed is dumb or foolish for marrying a kid? Remember I have rights to my opinion too; btw, how many wives did he marry again?

Live and let's live brother, you don't have to attack someone else's believe to prove a point, instead analyze intelligently. If you're educated, you'll understand this. Although u don't sound academically inclined probably you're 'arabically inclined'; I wouldn't know.

smh.
You cant disprove my claim.*piss off*