Kingston277's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kingston277's Profile › Kingston277's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 14 pages)
War Canoes https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/22/Bagandanwarcanoe.jpg/300px-Bagandanwarcanoe.jpg [img]http://libweb5.princeton.edu/visual_materials/maps/websites/africa/stanley/stanley2-8.jpg[/img] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/95/WarcanoeKongoriver.jpg [img]http://libweb5.princeton.edu/visual_materials/maps/websites/africa/stanley/stanley1-6.jpg[/img] |
[img]http://3.bp..com/-0dOr6aFg_MU/UEjpEvbXtGI/AAAAAAAABfw/NdGzw0FzQME/s640/8kyocanoe8tj.gif[/img] PhysicsMHD: In Dafuna Canoe, History is Being Made |
PhysicsRND: "[b]In pre-colonial times, as now, the builders were specialists, often (in |
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1114/4733717449_3cf49dbe33_z.jpg PhysicsRND: "West African canoes were constructed according to a method which |
PhysicsHD: 13. |
PhysicsHD: I posted three more things, but the spambot attacked me. |
PhysicsMHD: 9: |
PhysicsMHD: Really? |
The following info provided by user Physics and co. https://polishingpeanuts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Will-Boase-African-Boat-Builder.jpg Pleep: African Man building a fishing sailboat in the same way his ancestors did hundreds of years ago. |
https://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01649/Mopti_-Niger-River_1649863i.jpg https://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/40/4003/AT4WF00Z/posters/nigel-pavitt-niger-inland-delta-a-pirogue-under-sail-on-the-niger-river-between-mopti-and-timbuktu-mali.jpg https://www.westafricadiscovery.co.uk/uploads/1/4/2/7/1427275/8251735_orig.jpg?225 https://www.visitgaomali.com/SiteDuneRoseY.JPG |
Pharaoh Khufu's Ship https://cdnfiles.hdrcreme.com/40368/medium/khufu-ship.jpg?1338734771 Width: 19.5ft Length: 143ft |
Swahili Dhows https://www.insightguides.com/docs/images/lead/76de5f34-53f3-443f-a467-177a23462ecf.Swahili_dhows_South_Coast_TanzZanz.jpg https://www.duarasafaris.com/media/k2/items/cache/7f2cd38b7681e6e2ef83b5a7a5385264_XL.jpg https://www.kizingonibeach.com/media/uploads/A-dhow-racing_jpg_918x358_crop_q85.jpg From the BBC (Dr. Chami)"It was thought that Swahili settlements were founded by foreigners, particularly by Islamic traders," he says. "But these discoveries show the people here were interacting with other civilisations - and long before the Islamic era."http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/1924318.stm |
More Niger Boats [img]http://cityofmythsriverofdreams.files./2013/03/p1010529.jpg[/img] https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Travel/Pix/pictures/2008/12/23/MaliPR4.jpg https://www.sagatours.com/images/sailing.jpeg https://www.visitgaomali.com/Moptipinasse1.JPG https://tupela.cachefly.net/tb/uploads/niger-river-niafounke-mali.jpg https://www.rosemarysheel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/mali_niger_river_pinasse_sail02_smug.jpg |
I usually don't make topics on forums but people have covered other interesting African cultural topics here and I thought indigenous water vessels, rarely discussed at all for some reason, should be touched on more as well. It might also help provide incite into the Malian voyage to the Americas theory. I'm going to try to post up some of the larger, more ship-like ones while I'm at it. Niger river https://www.onhiatus.com/journal/photos/155-364-25.jpg https://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/13760027.jpg https://us.123rf.com/450wm/piccaya/piccaya1203/piccaya120300477/12572237-vessel-at-the-harbor-of-mopti-on-niger-river-in-mali.jpg https://www.onhiatus.com/journal/photos/141-489-20.jpg From wiki: It is known by historians that at its height the Mali Empire built a large naval fleet under Emperor Mansa Musa in the late 13th and early 14th century.[23] Arabic sources describe what some consider to be visits to the New World by a Mali fleet in 1311.[24]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship Wiki on Cape Verde: Possible visits from Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cape_Verde#Possible_visits_from_Africa |
"The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you can see." -- Winston Churchill It has always been intuitively obvious to me that the past and the future cannot be severed from each other. Back when I was a young, naive liberal, it never occurred to me that I should despise the old simply because it is old; when I grew older, wiser, and more "conservative," I never felt that the new is bad, simply because it is new. The only problem, for me, has been to understand how "tradition" and "progress" came to be considered contrasting rather than complementary opposites, and to articulate the reasons why this contrast is unnecessary, and even dangerous. At first glance, it seems that "conservatism" and "progressivism" are equally self-evident, yet equally vacuous. Who will deny that good things ought to be preserved, and that evils ought to be abolished? It makes no sense to distinguish between "progressives" and "conservatives" without indicating what kind of progress, or conservation of what. It makes no sense to want to change everything all at once, or to preserve everything forever. Although conservatives rarely if ever want "to preserve everything forever," conservatism emerged historically as a defensive reaction against people who did want "to change everything all at once." The political Left is defined, first and foremost, by its desire to tear down the existing society and build some preconceived utopia on the ruins. No wonder the Right has habitually regarded the future as a menace. The irony is that it's the utopians, from Plato on down to the feminists and environmentalists, who believe that society is, or can be, eternally fixed and inalterable. The utopian, exactly like the caricatured conservative, intends to "stand athwart history yelling Stop!" -- once he has recast society on his own design. Utopians underestimate the complexity and dynamism of the world, and overestimate the power of a simple and static order. Society is too complex, unpredictable, and deeply rooted to be designed or recreated by anyone. Every plan for the complete reconstruction of society must be rejected outright, no matter what goals it aims at. The attempt to level society and rebuild it from the ground up will only lead to death and destruction; society will be damaged, but no utopia will replace it. Nor can the evolution of society be predicted or planned: there are too many variables. The world has a certain resistence to the force of human intentions, a certain inertia, even a certain perversity. There are two reasons for this. The first is that man is not omniscient, and therefore all our actions have unforeseeable consequences. The second is that man, by nature, is free; that is to say, he has free will. The intentions of social planners will always run up against the wills of the rest of us -- us, the planned. Whenever a self-selected few set themselves up to plan the destiny of all mankind, as the Communists did and as the liberals still do, they set themselves against every other human being; every one of us, to some extent, is going to resist being treated like inanimate matter to be shaped according to some planners' notion of how the world should be. Now, "progress" must have a particular direction, which is itself a matter of debate. There are different kinds of "progressives": nowadays, there are liberals and libertarians. Liberals want to "progress" towards an all-powerful government; libertarians want to "progress" towards anarchy. The good news is that "progress" is indeterminate: we are free to decide for ourselves what it means -- what we want to progress towards. We can re-examine the idea of "progress" and redefine it as the continuation and enlargement of our inherited culture, rather than its contradiction and destruction. Progressivism and conservatism, as such, do not contradict each other: in fact, each is necessary for the other. Tradition, Chesterton said, is democracy for the dead; progress, then, is democracy for the unborn. We owe a kind of filial piety to the past -- to the ancestors who slowly built up our civilization over the generations; and surely the best homage we can pay them is to continue to increase the civilization we have inherited, which we in turn will hand down to our descendants. Conservatism is pointless with nothing to conserve; it is dependent on prior discovery and creation. Tradition, the inherited wisdom of the race, is simply the accumulation of the wisdom of individuals. A hallowed past is not a dead past -- it is the foundation for the works of the present and future. The past dies when its heirs fail to increase it. It is futile and pointless simply to try to preserve the status quo, which is always doomed, sooner or later, to go the way of all mortal things. Progress is necessary for our very survival: history shows that a relatively static society is doomed to be overrun by more innovative competitors. Innovations strengthen the established order by adapting it to changing circumstances. On the other hand, tradition and order are needed to consolidate and preserve past accomplishments. Innovations are only enduring when integrated into an established order. No matter how desirable any reform may be, the preservation of social order and the rule of law must always have greater priority. Given this basic stability and continuity, one may effect gradual and prudent reforms, as necessary. It is a basic requirement of human action to have stable and predictable social conditions. Any rapid change or violent disturbances, even in the name of "progress," can only threaten the security that individuals and societies require to survive and flourish. The complexity of civil society is such that any attempt to impose sudden, drastic changes will only lead to chaos. Stability and law are inherently necessary and good, even if a stable order is less than perfect, and even if there are some bad laws. Society is natural; types of society are conventional. Given the existence of society and human nature, and their requirements, it is possible to evaluate the many possible forms of society. The problem is to discover how to make convention conform to the standard set by nature, without disrupting the social order as a whole. Some things are bad and wrong, everywhere and always, and one should try to eliminate them when they exist, and prevent them when they do not. But in the gray areas, which are most areas, we should accept that which is, simply because it is. "When it is not necessary to change, it is necessary not to change." The habit of questioning traditions is a dangerous one. The very fact that a particular institution or custom has existed for a long time, creates a very strong presumption in favor of continuing it. This is true for two reasons. First, human beings are imperfectly and unequally rational. Therefore, most human behavior is determined by the forces of imitation and habit: in a word, tradition. Reason is embodied in history by means of tradition, and tradition must in turn be guided by reason. Reason discovers new facts, ideas and techniques; this knowledge gradually becomes taken for granted, habitual, quasi-automatic, freeing the mind to discover new things. Very few people discover or invent anything; they learn from those who do, by imitation. Nor could even the creative minority recreate the whole body of knowledge they have inherited; they have to take it for granted just as much as the inert majority. No one person, no one generation, can independently discover all truth. No one can even guide his own individual life solely on the basis of reason, without the support of tradition. Reason alone, then, is even more inadequate to create a whole social system. Reason must operate on the substance of a given situation: an individual life, or a common culture. Individuals and societies must take their inherited beliefs and customs for granted, and only examine and change them in exceptional circumstances. Ordinarily a tradition is not recognized as such: it is simply "the way things are done." When a tradition is recognized, it can be either rejected, modified, or affirmed. The last course is the safest, because there may well be reasons for a tradition that we have forgotten, and relearning those reasons the hard way would be unnecessary, and probably painful. Thus, rationalism is not necessarily opposed to tradition. It is precisely reason that reveals the importance of tradition, a fact of human nature that must be reckoned with. Second, traditions have value in and of themselves, regardless of their content: they are social landmarks that give us our bearings in the world. Inherited patterns of behavior connect us spiritually to the past from which we inherited them, to those around us who share the same ways of doing things, and to those in the future to whom we shall pass our inheritance on. It has often been said that rapid technological change requires us to change our morals, customs, and institutions. This is plausible only if we assume that man was made for the machine, not the machine for man. Technology only gives us new means to pursue ends: it is up to us to decide what we will do with it. If anything, technological progress makes cultural conservatism more necessary than ever. We need to hold on to our old standards and purposes, lest we be lured (as so many have been) into making idols of our machines. Conservatism is not (or need not be) merely a resistance to change in general, but a positive attachment to some particular way of life and the community that embodies it. Because communities, traditions, and nations do exist and are important, conservatism is not merely temperamental and insubstantial. Shared traditions are essential for social cohesion, and therefore a primary and permanent good. Any conception of "progress" that undermines social cohesion is flawed -- it is not progressive at all, but destructive. It is this attachment to particular traditions that allows us to maintain the thread of continuity through the changefulness of the world. The most politically relevant attachment is patriotism, loyalty to one's country: in the modern Western context, this means loyalty to one's nation-state. America has changed amazingly (not always for the better) since we became an independent nation, but we are still the same country we were in 1776, and if we are willing, we shall still be the same country in 2776. © 1999 by Karl Jahn http://karljahn.tripod.com/tan/tradprog.html https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Kumasi.png/220px-Kumasi.png https://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/350000/images/_353462_eredo300.jpg https://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/vd51233bc0.jpg |
RandomAfricanAm: @kingston277Thank you. This is the problem with self-haters and non-Africans for that matter. Not only do they form opinions off pure ignorance and think they can preach it to others like qualified experts(All the anti-African threads on here), but they ALWAYS fail to use consistent logic when studying human history and connecting it with today's issues. For example, they will gladly explain that Greece and Rome fell from dominance to economically shaky republics over time but equate the problems of Africa today with ancient indigenous cultures to justify their ignorant views. They won't even question how Mesopotamia is now part of modern day Iraq, and these people never get questioned for their logic! Self-haters will happily lap up any "information" about themselves by their foreign colonial/slave masters without question and view them as role models while shun their own culture no matter how insignificant. Have you seen the thread about the funeral practice which had the corpse sitting-in-state instead of lying-in-state? According to Nigerians, it's a barbaric practice. Look at this thread, they want equate the pre-colonial leaders with modern day leaders, ones that housed and fed their citizens with ones that have to go abroad for health care: https://www.nairaland.com/1365502/why-blacks-destroy-every-neighborhood smh. |
@KoloOyinbo You seriously have a lot of research to do because you have failed to demonstrate adequate understanding of this conversation or any of my points. I have called you ignorant because you choose not to even react to my clarifications and continue on arguing about juju which I have demonstrated time and time again I do not support nor did I even defend. It seems I have to spell it out loud and clear for you since you either are having comprehension problems or you are choosing to be ignorant to African culture. No, a juju or mami waters-centric is not going to be taken seriously in general except among like minded people let alone in a high intellectual career, a traditional medicine-man, philosopher, engineer or surgeon however, can easily get a job and even build a business due to their years of experience in their fields, not even these people would take a juju priest that seriously because that is against their principles. You are beginning to sound like a culture thief who attributes any developments or achievements Africa has made for thousands of years beyond hunting and gathering to the work of foreign intervention, this mentality is typical of non-Africans and "Afropeans" alike who have failed to open a book, look at a documentary or surf the web for creditable sources and it is the main reason why the world is such as mess today; ignorance, bigotry and ethnocentrism. Magic healing? For the third time, WHAT DOES ANYTHING I HAVE POSTED SO FAR HAVE TO DO WITH MAGIC, JUJU OR SUPERSTITION? Seriously, show me? |
KoloOyinbo: OK it looks like you want the last word on this nonsense.Or, it seems you seek to spread falsehood on this thread through your uneducated, ignorant posts. KoloOyinbo: I know I will not convince you as you have not even attempted to address the point of this thread and only attempted to spout illogical superstition about juju etc which no rational argument will ever convince a silly believer that it is rubbish.I don't care about the topic so much as I do about your nonsensical preaching getting through without evaluation. You come on here bantering about some correlation between the religious beliefs of some Africans and how they are negatively viewed from the outside. Then when I drop in with my 2 cents offering up proof to the contrary, the discussion suddenly gets derailed(anyway) into an argument about which culture is more advanced than the other based on level of reliance on science vs. religion which is DOA since all cultures had some level of scientific foundation as researched by Henry Odera Oruka in Sage Philosophy article which you clearly didn't bother to read. I tried to explain to you that the Op’s views are owed to mismanagement and neo-colonialism and that the west seeks the scientific view of life no more than developing. I also presented proof of this by statistics and centuries old techniques to show that many pre-colonial African societies were structured just as many contemporary western or Asian societies all through history with qualified people like sage, medicinemen or blacksmith working as scientists, doctors and engineers and average society holding superstitious views. But instead of reading any of my posts and responding to the links, you just skip over everything and regurgitate the same irrelevant B.S. over and over again. Now you think you and your shaky points can succeed by propping up deliberate misinterpretations and pointless strawman arguments about juju to avoid answering my questions and refuting my evidence directly Try again plz.KoloOyinbo: THE DOGON BULL**** IS NOT UNDER DEBATE BY ANY SCIENTIST JUST A FRINGE OF SEMI EDUCATED PSEUDO SCIENTISTS.Until you can supply peer reviewed sources that have deemed the Dogon debate dead as of the late 20th century/early 21st century, it’s a moot point. The new argument is weather Sirius C exists or not in which I have provided a Wikipedia link that gives both sides to the debate, but since you do not click on links but prefer to shout and swear to get your opinions across, you cannot correctly address my questions as you have demonstrated above. KoloOyinbo: To say the West (I presume you mean the DEVELOPED World) is hypocritical, is offence and just plain wrong!Learn to read links and check the sources plz. KoloOyinbo: The beliefs of long ago have been put to the test. Those passing are incorporated as science, those failing get relegated to superstition. That is how society and science works.https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc4m1azMpM1qlyh48.gif Congratulations, we are finally on the same page now. Simply let the third world debunk their own myths and organize a testing ground for them like your recent ancestors did with yours. Ancient traditional hypothesis, philosophical and engineering tactics that pass get incorporated into modern science while unnecessary religious practices get relegated to superstition, simple, just a cultural reevaluation like the wise sages have done for centuries. Your error was that you discredited indigenous science and engineering by lumping it with juju but really, the argument should just end here. KoloOyinbo: As for Bigfoot and UFO's (lol)... please... again you take some uneducated non scientists as representative of our societies!If you try clicking on the links for once, you will see fully qualified sources issuing these surveys. Even if they were non-scientists, that still doesn't change the fact that the issued surveys that went around the country specifically asked if they believed in UFO’s and 80 million checked YES! In some schools they used to issue surveys about physical health to students, did they need fully qualified scientists to calculate those results? What's the need to inflate the results? KoloOyinbo: Instead ask if a belief that JUJU can make a human bullet proof - often in the papers in Naija and even included in a recent Police Report - is helpful to Naija in its attempt to develop.Ask your police department if the mediums they employ are helpful in finding kidnap victims-often in papers AND media here in Canada and in the US. And please don’t sidetrack this into another “Trying to justify juju” argument because I'm not clarifying my opinions again. KoloOyinbo: Instead of trying to argue that Developing world societies are no more superstitious than developed you would be better addressing your efforts to debunking and eradicating those stupid superstitions that exist in your local.Didn't I recommend this to you in an earlier post with your local area? That was the time when I called westerners hypocrites? KoloOyinbo: I don't want to clutter this thread any more so please reply direct.I got your first message but it said something about not being connected. New to PMing on nairaland ![]() KoloOyinbo: However please don't bother to quote newspaper clippings and utube nonsense to include in a scientific argument.Again, look at the articles and videos BEFORE calling them non-sense. Most of what you said is irrelevant to my point and my sources. KoloOyinbo: To even quote the Dogon rubbish (resolved MANY years ago) show the false information and lack of scientific training that you are arguing from.Seriously, when was this resolved? You say it was "resolved" MANY years ago but the latest results NASA released were inconclusive: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995A%26A...299..621B (were you even in astronomy during the time this was written?) Please, how can the Dogon issue be "resolved" when many astronomers claim they don’t have telescopes powerful enough to get a clear shot of Sirius B let alone detect Sirius C, not to mention THEY CLAIM both stars have irregular orbits? Again, moot point. KoloOyinbo: As for all other readers please lets return this thread to its original premise and not be distracted by any justification of primitive beliefs that are just plain wrong and diminish the society they are in and those uneducated enough to believe them.Yes, please. This whole argument is moot until someone provides some rock solid evidence that answers any remaining questions. Especially since it is clear you do not have full grasp my stance well enough to notice that nothing I have posted since joining this discussion fits your accusations nor do any of my sources. Please go back and review before replying. |
ladionline: It's on record how the 'doctor' of the time administered bleeding on George Washington and jeopardise the old man's life thinking they were 'curing' him. But that never stopped earl Nightingale from revamping old ways of doing things. Hipocrate did not invent medicine but he was sung. Imagine if these individuals were just all about what their ancestors 'almost' or 'actually' got right! We would still be in the woods right now. Like John occam would say 'do not invent new weird theory when a simple common sense one already exist' any procedure that can not be adaptable to industry or mas production but subsistent process is D.O.A.! The glory of Africa is what the future hold, not the 'almosts' of the past.So you would prefer orthodox doctors to jeopardize his life instead like Ronald Reagan? b.t.w, how has chemotherapy survival rate been going for cancer patients lately? |
KoloOyinbo: Check around the web?? Where some people promote superstition along with science and others (often intelligent but lacking in a scientific education) cannot tell the difference between the two. Sorry I prefer to leave those in ignorance alone as long as they are not harming others. Don't believe every video on the web please.What does statistics have to do with superstition KoloOyinbo: I am really not sure what point you are trying to make by these repeated postsMy point is, the west is being hypocritical. They say the developing world has outdated beliefs but proceed to fill their populations minds with UFO propaganda. Also, examine the percentages again. KoloOyinbo: Is it that old superstitions are correct??What superstitions of any kind is correct? When did I say any superstition was correct? Ask your fellow scientists if the Bigfoot hypothesis sounds correct. KoloOyinbo: No scientist would believe even a fraction of the things you have quoted.What? No scientist would believes those stats I posted? There just stats, why would that concern scientists? Or perhaps you were talking about the bush doctor? I recommend you stroll down to your local pharmacy and see just how much herbal medicine is being taken seriously by science these days, and these recipes come straight from the people you are criticizing. KoloOyinbo: Mankind progresses and nonsense gets left behind although new nonsense gets dreamed up to put in its place. 'Bush Doctors' and herbalists or the equivalent in every society often get some things correct (penicillin etc) but good modern medicine is far better and the bush docs also do a lot of damage as well.http://www.healthline.com/galecontent/chemical-poisoning There seems to be an equal amount of concern about the safety of orthodox medicine aswell. And as you can see... https://www.nairaland.com/1324798/fg-include-herbal-medicine-medical https://www.nairaland.com/1526308/african-traditional-priest-performs-brain-surgery https://www.nairaland.com/1168777/nigerian-medical-students-study-traditional Medicine men are getting a lot of attention lately, and now you have doctors running to them for cures to market to their consumers as "an ancient healer from deep in the jungle now available to you". You seem overly confident with orthodox medicine for solving all illness but others disagree with that stance...(they don't call it alternative medicine for nothing) mimifonwon: i so agree with this, for western medicine no matter the developments -it cannot cure all the ailments in africa, for africa must learn to look inward to help itself advance to better nations, am proud of nigeria for this, if it is carried out right. The problem sometimes in naija is that we have good ideas but it is rarely carried out right. There are so many ailments that dibia's or native doctors know how to cure better. For example when am on my period, i drink 4oz onugbu( ewuro), ugba water, and nchawu boiled with 1teaspoon of salt added and i dont get cramps through my period, and it helps with stomach aches too, and if you boil mburogu with ayakata, fish head and aligator pepper and give to a woman who just gave birth it helps her heal faster. Also if you have high fever and you drink ewuro( first rinse) and oha water ( 1 full cup), your fever will go within an hour. ( crush akilu,akanwu( 1/5 tsp), palm oil(1tsp) and oji( kolanut and its fruit and orchard fruit and you drink it while studying it helps your memory and keeps you awake like hell depends on the amount you take. Its better than red bull. (my grandma-native doc makes them). It helped me through out college, and my brother who had what americans called add and my grandma was like, "rubbich, bringi him to nigeria and i will cure him" lol - my mom did as she said and my brother was definitely cured, his now a physicist and i guess it made him too focused. But what am trying to say is that most of our cures we need is in nature and our native doctors are better than most western doctors, and understands our body and nature better, its just ignorant and brainwash that makes us believe that western medicine is better than our native medicine. Yes there are things western medicine can offer that native cant, but its better if they work together. Btw my grandma is a healthy 98 year old woman, still farms and cooks her own meals and take care of herself without anyone's help. So I trust her native medical ways, and she has never been to a modern doctor or to a hospital( she hates western doctors).Wouldn't a better plan be to fuse tradition with orthodox like other countries are doing? People around the world are dying of malaria despite an abundance of herb cures collecting dust because people are more interested in waiting patiently for whatever hocus pocus the west can come up with rather than turning what WORKS, cultures learn fro each other you know. Fortunately the Nigerian government is tuning that around by sending students to study it. Even China is said to be modernizing indigenous herbal remedies to distribute internationally, why not Africa aswell? KoloOyinbo: No properly educated person will accept the nonsense of Dogon or some of the other things you mentioned. Tribal superstitions are holding Africans (and other developing societies) back from taking their rightful place in the world. Fortunately they slow the process but do not stop it.The Dogon issue is till under considerable debate so it's pretty soon to jump to conclusions when no one else has. They is even evidence of Sirius C recently http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogon_people#Dogon_and_Sirius Back on the topic of medicine, it seems the drug companies, Nigerian government and many others don't agree with you as can be observed with their eagerness to promote medicine men over orthodox medicine. There are well though out plans to get these methods you call "juju" into mainstream distribution through modernization, simply slap dosage stickers on the drugs and distribute them over the counter, or take that brain surgeon in the video and put him in a hospital with a heart monitor and other modern equipment and watch tradition work wonders Even that bush doctor lady can become a millionaire off what she does with some funding, equipment, facilities and attention. KoloOyinbo: Now I am sorry but I cannot waste either of our times disproving every stupid superstition you care to post here. I have other things to do and only entered this thread to disagree with the extremely racist idea that white people were more intelligent than black. You seem to have taken my remarks on the primitive beliefs of developing cultures as some sort of personal attack. they are not. Merely historical fact. Now I don't want to spend more time on Ghosts, Juju, Magic and that nonsense. If you believe that stuff then fine but dont blame me for what people think of you (it will not be complimentary).Now I'm not going to dig too much into the strawman arguments and misinterpretations in the remainder of your post but I will ,however, leave you with more proof that African society have always been moving foreword. This article for example discusses "sage philosophy" (wise men) and how they basically worked as the scientists, philosophers, and cultural organizers for their community before colonization. This research by Henry Odera Oruka works to dispel myths that Africans were tied to religious practices and were able to discern what was practical and what was not. Even some wide spread practices such as juju was not endorsed by many wise sages whom seeked logical explanations for occurances. Sound familiar? (scientific community principles vs. hyper-religious citizens, anyone?) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/african-sage/ |
KoloOyinbo: Yes it is clear you are NOT a scientist. That is OK. Please when quoting about science though it is best to quote FROM SCIENTISTS and NOT from the popular press or stupid internet articles/blogs/social media sites by uniformed non scientists.These polls were reliable enough to get featured on news networks (of course news networks are iffy with accurate info) and it is now common knowledge. Check around the web. KoloOyinbo: They DO NOT represent science. Science WORKS (otherwise our technological world today would not).Just like what many ancient African sociaties believed! KoloOyinbo: Science is proven! And if you have travelled as widely as I have you realise that stupid superstition is present everywhere by is much more prevalent in the developing world for obvious reasons discussed at lenght before.I have travelled around the Caribbean (were my parents are from) and can see both superstition and common sense just like any where else and in the same proportions, even with the maroons up in the mountains, Here is Jamaican herbal medicine using centuries old scientific techniques: kingston277:How did they manage to do these things? certainly not with superstitions. |
KoloOnyinbo: Yes ancient beliefs are primitive compared to 21st century knowledge which incorporates these beliefs into it's philosophy and passes it off as modern science, but in ancient times it was top notch info. Are you comparing an average African to western scientists? I like in the west and am having a hard time believing that statement about westerners being enlightened with all those people over here believing in ancient aliens, phycic mediums, ghosts, race, bigfoot, ufos, etc. Please explain how they are different again. If you long for an enlightened developing world, start with the developed world first plz.No, I am not a scientist, I am merely here for answers. kingston: 277http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/survey-shows-republicans-conspiracy-theories-article-1.1306229Why are these percentages so darn high then? there no exuse for this the developed world. Yes, most of my links are about Americans, thats mostly what I could find but my point still stands. Why does that country have a huge bible belt that believes the earth was created in 6 days? The country is not setting a good example for the rest of the world. How many scientists came out of the woodwork to debunk said beliefs only to be met with ignorance. Why are Chinese scientist still producing nonsense despite presumably ridding themselves of such beliefs? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEbZLriuOR0 Why is Japan having sucide problems? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewmcfbrown/100063456/why-do-so-many-japanese-people-kill-themselves/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku Yes, nations need to rid themselves of superstions mostly in their scientific coummunities (science seeds logic anyway), but with such silly beliefs running rampant in contermporary western sociaty (excluding the scientific community), what reason does the developing world have to let go? Can't a society believe what they want as long as it doesn't cloud their scientific community or learn to disprove such beliefs on their own since their so committed? |
Man I hate posting on tablets :PMy last posts really got messed up ![]() |
Of couse this knowlegde was shared by many civilizations, people including Africans were philosiphers and seeked possible (scientific) explanations for things like everyone else. I listed the above to show you that Africans were not consumed in superstion which from what i've read from your posts, you imply their beliefs were "primitive" even for Ancient period standards and I came to debunk that. I read Dogon and Sirius, while it has some possible explaination to consider, it does not debunk the possiblitity of the knowlage originating from another group of Africans or The Dogons themeselves origination from a civilization of sorts. This read by Van Sertima elaborates and pushes the possibility that sirius b was indeed visible 2000 y.o. in red giant form through ancient greek accounts, so maybe the dogon (and others) must have been able to observe it even with their level of technology: KoloOyinbo: The Dogon were actually quite unaware of Sirius B. (I was an Astronomer for over 20 years) and simply had some guesses misinterpreted. The had zero 'secret knowledge'.I've read a person's explanation on a website saying that It was unlikely that a person interviewing the dogons decades later would not get the same answers that the two Frenchmen got, He used an anology of one person seeing fish in a river, and another person going there and not seeing such fish, would you say there are no fish in the river at all? Plus, the Dogons also had knowlage of the rings of Saturn and preform a dance representing Sirius B's orbit around Siruis A every 50 years. KoloOyinbo: All ancient beliefs were primitive! African are otherwise. i am not attacking African culture merely supporting it as no more primitive or advanced than any other ancient culture. My point is that the DEVELOPING world (Note I did NOT say African and would reject that premise entirely) still retains non logical or scientific superstitions. I HATE this as it allows Racists to Denigrate people they have no right to. I look forward to an enlightened Developing world (including Africa) free of superstitious nonsense and when I can travel to Naija without people chattering about 'JuJu', Mami Waters and such. (Dogon Mythology is OK though) I hope i have not offended but am actually trying to be supportive.Yes ancient beliefs are primitive compared to 21st century knowledge which incorporates these beliefs into it's philosophy and passes it off as modern science, but in ancient times it was top notch info. Are you comparing an average African citizen to western scientists? You know not all scientific knowlage reaches the general public immediatly right? I live in the west and am having a hard time believing your statement with all these people chattering about ancient aliens, phychic mediums, ghosts, race, bigfoot, ufos, etc, Please elaborate. If you long for an enlightened developing world, starting with the developed world might be a good starting point. To add, the average citizens do not represent complete pre-colonial knowledge as they are not of those professions. For instance I read and article that some iron working sociaties had citizens that believed blacksmiths had special powers, they thought this because the ability to blacksmith was limited knowlage. The article explained that the priests, medicinemen, etc were more scientific and logical than the rest of the population because they needed material to support their beliefs or in the case of the medicinemen, concoct something that works. Not to mention ancient peoples all over the world mixed science with religion, that's how science was born in the first place, even catholicism pioneered advanced medicine and incorporated scince into their beliefs. Philosophy leads to logic even in the midst of religion. |
KoloOyinbo: KoloOyinbo:Please link me to one of these "explainations" because as far as I know, the dogon beleifs are still fact and has been theorized that the knowlage came from nile-valley along with other people of the sahel. So the Dogon Knowlege of the Circulatory system is false? what about the Yoruba theories of a spherical universe which is still wide spread in science today? What about the Africans that can skillfully preform medical procedures? Please pay a visit to your local library, these are well documented. |
KoloOyinbo: OK. Firstly do NOT confuse intelligence with education. Forget black and white. The people in the developed world are in general better educated simply because they come from the developed world! People in the developing world however, often have not had the benefit of a full education to the standards of the developed world. NOT THEIR FAULT AND IT DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE LESS INTELLIGENT JUST LESS FORTUNATE.So the Dogon beliefs are primitive even though they were proven correct in the 70s? smh. |
Try again plz.
Even that bush doctor lady can become a millionaire off what she does with some funding, equipment, facilities and attention.