Kkins25's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kkins25's Profile › Kkins25's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 162 pages)
Supremos:What do people do with money for christ sake?? how much food do you want to eat? how many cars do you want to ride? Can't African leaders be corrupt like American leaders, instead of stealing money, why not help business prosper, and then put in policies that help such business to prosper, then buy stocks. ![]() |
efficiencie:Certainly. But this holds true if you're drunk on the idea that there was "nothing." As a matter of fact, we don't know what "nothing" is. Can you define "nothing"? And now, for the obvious rebuttal, 1) what then caused God? 2) why didn't God create the world before the time of creation, or after the time he created it? In other words, what caused God to create the world then, why not now, or now before then? 3) A follow-up from point 2. Why hasn't any creation occurred since then? Did God run out of juice or ideas? Is humanity the best God could do? Why does a creator wait for evolution---a process of trial and error, to achieve perfectionism? Even then, this "perfectionism" is nothing but the ability of the creation to adapt to the constant environmental changes, which are also unpredictable. Is the probability of change so innumerable that it's beyond the imaginative faculty of God? 4) If you cannot answer these questions, then you do not know God. Therefore, it's evil to teach me about what you, yourself, have no idea about. 5) A creation that cannot understand its creator cannot claim to be created in the spitting image of the creator. That goes to say, the God you serve could also be the creation of another CREATOR, who's also transcendent to the God you serve. In order words, your God has a GOD. Insane? Not quite. Read on the gnostics, Yaldabaoth the demurge, and the divine mother, Pistis Sophia. Some folks definitely had that idea, going all the way back to Pluto or even Socrates. What is Evolution? 1. Evolution Is not the creation of the world, nor does it offer any theories of how life was formed. For that, read on Abiogenesis (Do not confuse this with the debunked theory of spontaneous generation like Sirtee15). 2. Evolution only tells us how wolves became dogs, figuratively speaking. 3. Creation of the universe? For that, the most plausible theory is the Big Bang---the compression of all sub-atomic particles, collusion, fusion, and expansion. Just to get that out of the way!!! You need an uncaused first cause that must be responsible for all life and responsible for all morality.Then, why isn't morality the same for all beings? |
efficiencie:No, my friend. Hollywood isn't America. As a matter of fact, conservatives are in the majority. That's by the way, though, as this does not negate what the studies have shown. FYI, more than one study demonstrated this. And yes, it's good to scrutinize studies; that's what makes science---SCIENCE. However, if you believe that a whole Scientific paper could be falsified for propaganda, how much more is the bible, which wasn't handed down to you by the authors? The paper is false but the bible which was forced down your throat is the one void of any propaganda? Come on bro! Don't make me pull my hair out! The link to the journal is cited in the page, if you cared to do some homework. |
15 students ? The fvck! To knack no dey tire these lecturers?It must be some kind of fettish or something, cuz, what happened to all d sex workers? Why do they derive pleasure in having such affairs with students? |
efficiencie:A study conducted by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, found that atheists and agnostics are more driven by compassion to help others than highly religious people The study, which was published in the July 2012 issue of the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, analyzed data from a national survey of more than 1,300 American adults The findings indicated that compassionate attitudes were linked with how many generous behaviors a person engaged in, and this link was strongest in people who were atheists or only slightly religious, compared with people who were more strongly religious In another experiment, participants were told that a participant before them had given a portion of their money to a stranger, and those who reported feeling more compassionate and less religious were more generous in this experiment The study suggests that empathy and compassion are not the only factors at play in religious people's giving, but it does indicate that atheists and agnostics tend to be more compassionate and more inclined to help others when they feel compassionate. https://www.livescience.com/20005-atheists-motivated-compassion.html |
Zonefree: ![]() |
BRATISLAVA:Good luck. Don't forget to make daddy G.O happy tomorrow!! |
Expanse2020:You're half right and half wrong. First thing's first, no single book in the current bible was inspired by God. Because, then, how would the people prove it such? To the matter, most of the books you mentioned aren't genuine. Not in the sense that the canonical scriptures, in themselves, are accurate, but that the books you've mentioned were written by fans. Yep. The same way people make alternative outcomes to anime scenes, movies, etc. Religious books also have fan fiction. Apostolic authorship: The books were either not written by an apostle or were considered to have insufficient spiritual content.We know for sure that most of the gospels aren't written by those they are named after. We don't even have the oldest and authentic documents. In fact, all accounts of the gospels are fan made. Some were just closer to the original than others. For instance, you find major discrepancies here and there on the accounts of Jesus' life. How can God-inspired book have contradictions? Orthodoxy: The books did not conform to the essential teachings that all churches accepted.Yep. The same guys going about killing innocent people are the ones to tell us what's holy or not. Usage: The books were not widely used by the churches from the beginning.Ahhh... any book that church fathers found wasn't helping their ministry was thrown out. God that inspired it, him no get sense abi? So, church father don turn God? Divine inspiration: The books were not considered to be divinely inspired.The fifty shades of grey, the harry potter books, and so on, were all inspired by God. Bite me! Authority: The books were considered to lack the authority of the Gospels.This I can somewhat side with. There are thousands of manuscripts that were written all bearing "gospel of mathew" "Gospel of John," and so on. But each of them was different from the other. How? So, you see, Christianity had a large fan base, and many fans didn't like the plot. If life gives you lemons, make lemonade, and that's exactly what they did. They made their own gospels. Infact, I'd argue that gospel of John is one of those. Controversial material: The books contained material that Early Orthodox Christian leaders did not agree with.Anybook that didn't fit into the narrative of christianity that the church daddys had was thrown in the dustbin. |
BRATISLAVA:Again, you see why i say, theist fail to use common sense more often than not. All you have to do is look around you, even our ancestors were more intelligent that you lot. At least, they didn't have the knowledge we have. Even then, religion, was their way of life and no different from their culture. Today, somebody with mental problem is going to church hoping pastor will cast the demon out. Do you see why i say y'all are the dumbest set of "religionist" on the planet? ![]() I even told you that studies have revealed that people who subscribe to religious belief lose a part of their brain. It didn't shake you. Of course, the only time you trust science is when you have malaria. After that, brain reboots to default wereyness. ![]() efficiencie:A study was done recently on the level of compassion for their fellow humans, i believe, between Atheist and Christians. The study showed that although Christians complained more about evil in the world, they didn't act on becoming better or even fighting the evil. ooops, that's just me putting words into the study... The study showed that Atheist are willing to do and currently do more for humanity than Christians. What the study really wanted to say was "Christians are all hypocrites and selfish." ahhhh....That's more like it. What more would one expect from a bunch of delunded pricks who believe their are the "best" in the world? "God's children." Yeah right! ![]()
|
SIRTeee15: ![]() otilor ![]() |
BRATISLAVA:The problem is most of you aren't. Atheist, on the other hand, are aware of their ignorance, that's why if you ask me, "how did the world start?" I'd say, I DON'T KNOW. A theist, however, seems to not know God and knows God, at the same time. A conversation with the average theist, and you'd find just how unintelligible most people are. The Atheist aren't necessarily more intelligible, it's just that, the very fact that they are willing to learn from ground zero proves their willingness and resolve to learn. That, to me, gives them a score in favor of superior intelligence. If theist were intelligent, would they cue at the gates of a church like that owned by TBJ, huh? Intelligent theist know and recognize that religion is one of the many boats which humans built to navigate the waters of life. Unfortunately, such group of theists are mostly educated in philosophy, and make up about 0.0001% of theist. PS: Intelligence here isn't general IQ, even though, studies show Atheist to have better scores. Plus, studies have shown that theist tend to have an underdeveloped frontal lobe. As in, the front part of their brain begins to die due to religion. However, intelligence is a spectrum. Here, i'd define it as the ability to identify and solve problems, alter their beliefs in favor of more credible and productive ones, and ability to see the world through the eyes of humanity. Another PS: Thiest here refers to those who cling to Abrahamic religions. |
. |
KnownUnknown:I don't think it was more of condoning slavery per se. The Christians truly believed the world was ending in their era. If it were ending now, what was the essence of fighting for freedom. I know, if there's one thing the Jews hate, it's being called slaves. |
The recent king is liberal and doing his best to push the country towards liberalism. I've watch a couple of vids of sheiks accusing him of abandoning the "way." But, this move is simply for money, and not women empowerment. So, I agree. "we did not build women tennis sport for Saudi Arabia to exploit it." I thought the "women" must be escorted by a man shyte has stopped. hmmm.... |
what do fvck do you mean by core belief, SIRTeee15? So, if Jesus is not God, how the hell could salvation, resurrection, baptism, and everything else about xtianity make sense? |
What is SIRTeee15 even saying? What do you mean by core belief? |
Smile4mee01:Are you in Diaspora or it's a name of a village in Nigeria? All the health facilities there, this shouldn't be a problem, should it? You also don't know that the quality of sperms reduce as you age, even as a man? O ma se oh... |
The court thereafter ordered his remand in a correctional facility. |
YoungLionken:No Sir.. Control ur penis. |
E don enter front page, you go too collect... Dem no go gree for you...oga sukkot. ![]() |
Aemmyjah:A Volvox is not a multicellular organism. It's a colony of unicellular organism, much like an ant colony. Same with the green stuff you see in ponds and water. The thing is, two unicellular Volvox can attach to each other and function as a bi-cellular organism. |
Aemmyjah:you'd do well to review the links I sent. A iiger isn't an intelligent design Aemm. Because we didn't know the outcome. All we did was get a "Lion to knack a Tiger." As you've seen, even dogs can knack humans. If they happen to give birth to a Huma-Dog, is that intelligent design? |
Aemmyjah:Anything that needs a host to survive and cause damage to that host is a parasite Aemmyjah. Humans can be parasites too.. You no sabi English ne? Again, an hypothesis is not a factHere you go, this began in the 1950s.... https://www.britannica.com/science/Miller-Urey-experiment. it has been replicated severally and the verdict remains the same. In the right conditions inorganic molecules could react to for organic-life-supporting, molecules. Ask chatgpt or any baby science textbook if a virus is a living organism. Why are you foolish like this? Bible, you no sabi.Yes. but that is the definition we give to SSS students. . Us biologist argue as to the state of being of a virus. here's a Virus according to WikiA virus is a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism.[1] Viruses infect all life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.[2][3] Viruses are found in almost every ecosystem on Earth and are the most numerous type of biological entity.[4][5] The creation period was divided into six parts called days but not 24 literal hour days cos the heaven and the earth were already there in the beginning . The entire universe is about 14 billion years old...So, why do you have a sabbath day? If the entire universe is about 14 billion years old, when was Adam created? And, how does that tally with the Genealogy of Jesus Christ who can be traced back to Adam via the gospel accounts. Lemme bring it down to your shallow understanding. And I'll use football soccerWhen was Adam formed? What was Adam? A man, or a homo Habilis? Is there day and night from God's dwelling place? we only have day and night cos of the movement of the Earth on the solar system. Only on earth do we have the 24 hours stuff of day and night cos of its movement and the satellite and the sunlight.I wouldn't know. If you did know, then maybe you've spoken to God, which I doubt, or you're speaking on his behalf, and saying things he never said. As usual with christians. |
Aemmyjah:Oh Ammejah.... A baby starts of as a unicellular organism, an Embryo, becomes bicellular, then spits further, and so on. So, do plants. Remember your Volvox Colony from your SSS biology? Something like that.... Good old Euglena ![]() |
Aemmyjah:"Although many equate abiogenesis with the archaic theory of spontaneous generation (Aemmyjah and Sirtee15), the two ideas are quite different." |
Aemmyjah: 1. How can you replicate biological(organic) molecules from inorganic molecules? 2. "It's a work in progress my man" - How is a scientific fact a work in progress 😂 You atheists are just fooling around. You are just like the transgender fanatics using science to explain that not only women can get pregnant whereas we know that only women can get pregnant. You're just hotheaded and came to Nairaland to start trouble when y'all have nothing meaningful to offerAbiogenesis, the idea that life arose from nonlife more than 3.5 billion years ago on Earth. A biogenesis proposes that the first life-forms generated were very simple and through a gradual process became increasingly complex. Biogenesis, in which life is derived from the reproduction of other life, was presumably preceded by abiogenesis, which became impossible once Earth’s atmosphere assumed its present composition. Although many equate abiogenesis with the archaic theory of spontaneous generation(Aemmyjah and Sirtee15), the two ideas are quite different. According to the latter, complex life (e.g., a maggot or mouse) was thought to arise spontaneously and continually from nonliving matter. While the hypothetical process of spontaneous generation was disproved as early as the 17th century and decisively rejected in the 19th century, abiogenesis has been neither proved nor disproved. ---https://www.britannica.com/science/abiogenesis |
Aemmyjah:If you were honest, you wouldn't be going in circles. Okay, tell us how a dog or house cat came about. What biological phenomenon occurred that led to Dog, cats, maize, water meon, pineapple, and so on? 1. You said Abiogenesis is a fact. No science textbook or Chatgpt agree. OlodoAbiogenesis is a broad term, a hypothesis that tries to explain the evolution of inorganic molecules to organic molecules, and to living organisms. As I said, the transformation of inorganic molecules to biological molecules has already been demonstrated in the lab. Scientists were able to mimic environmental conditions that would have existed millions of years ago at the ocean's floor where ife first began. Your ignorance is becoming as glaring as the morning sun. You claim it's impossible for inorganic molecules to become organic, but you believe god molded man out of dust and clay. Tell me, are these not inorganic molecules? Can you explain the mechanism, used by god to turn clay inot a breathing man? 2. You mentioned something about HIV? HIV is a virus and not a biological or living organism. Olodo. Go and meet any pupil who studied elementary scienceGood. At least you know this. Now, HIV is parasitic, why don't you ask yourself, how comes something like HIV exists? Waht's its purpose? This cannot be a mistake because, HIV knows to target the one thing that can kill it, that is, the immune system first before going out to target other systems. Why? Why does the HIV membrane have molecular extensions that can interact specifically with the cells of certain organisms? How did HIV have the ability to bypass the nucleus of the cell and know how to hijack the DNA? How? Intelligent design? But, you said it's not a living thing. 3. Ligers are hybrids created by human breeders in zoos or animal sanctuaries. You don't know history, science or biology or even logic. You don't just know anything but you crown yourself as emeritus when you know nothingBut, you do know, these are lab experiments and barely happens in the wild, not just because they reside in different habitats, but because they are different species, right? Therefore, god didn't create the liger... Man did. We are it's God! 4. You said the Bible mentions that the world was created in 6 literal days. It was what your pastor misinformed you that is making you mad and behaving very irrational and saying what the Bible does not teach...Then why is it understood that it was created in 6 days? And a seventh day sabbath is observed? Is jesus stupid to not know that he didn't create the world in 6 days? 12 points in all for you, I hope you don already carry league cos i won't bring myself down to your level and be claiming points like a little childNow, I lost count of the points you've lost. |
Aemmyjah:So, God didn't create all living things? ![]() |
Aemmyjah:ahhhh... I see. Tell me, what's the probability of a man picking one woman out of a 100 million versus the probability of one egg being fertilized by one out of a 100 million? The bible does not teach God created the bible in 6 days? Is that so? then why do you have a sabbath day, and not a sabbath era? ![]() |
Aemmyjah:You seem to be mistaken spontaneous generation for abiogenesis.. Abiogenesis is somewhat a fact because lab experiments have replicated the formation of biological(organic) molecules from inorganic molecules. It's a work in progress my man. It's not a fact or a theory yet, and it doesn't describe one phenomena. We know bio-molecules came from inorganic molecules, but haven't been able to show how those bio molecules became self replicating. So, Abiogenesis might not be a fact per se, but it's a credible hypothesis. |
Itooweak4una:Whaaaaaaaat!!!!! Did he tell you he is masturbating ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 162 pages)
? The fvck! To knack no dey tire these lecturers?
