₦airaland Forum

Eniitankorede:
➜You are complete ignorant of how people are referred according to their genealogy. Even your bible contains such description of people. You are ignorant about little things. Mary is a progeny of Al Imran.
➜ In Revelation 22:16, Jesus referred to himself as the son of David. Now tell me, did David directly bear Jesus? You will continue to remain in ignorance and darkness by refusing to read and make research.

1. But this information is completely false. 🥱🥱

2. You should probably read well to understand the reference. 🥱

16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to tell you these things for the churches. I am the descendant from the family of David. I am the bright morning star.” - Revelations 22 vs 16

Offspring includes all those descended from a root, in this case, David! 🥱🥱

victorVIC1:
You are trying. I did that for few months, I couldn't help it. It felt so lonely to the point that I was hanging at my place of work till night. Had to fast track my wedding to same year.

Fear of death was the reason for your marriage?😫😫😫

Eniitankorede:
✓ How can the All-knowing copy events that He was a witness?
✓ You seem to have problem understanding that the Quran is actually the revealed words of the All-knowing and All-aware and omnipresent Allah. When you get your head round it, you won’t be saying what you are saying.

Who is all-knowing in this? A man that confused the identity of Jesus Christ's mother with a woman who was written to have lived more than 1500 years before? How can a witness make such a blunder? 🥱🥱

2. You have never read that book in your own, have you? 🥱🥱

MMempire:
➜And this below is what?

You should probably open the book itself and read it for yourself to learn what it in fact says about that Maryam character. 🥱🥱

MMempire:
➜And coincidentally, your Quran copied almost all stories from the Bible. Even the Quran mentioned the name of Mary more than how many times your Muhammed?

The Mary in the Quran is not the same as the Mary in the Bible. Also, most of the stories in the Quran are not the same stories as in the Bible.

drstranged:
➜This is not a gender war. I am specifically referring to women, and I want honest discussion. I find this behaviour hypocritical and two-faced, and I’ll explain why. A woman accuses her boyfriend of “disturbing her for sex,” says he’s too sexually demanding, and uses that as a major reason to end the relationship. Fine. She has every right to leave.
But after the breakup, she goes on to date other men and ends up having the same sex she complained about — sometimes even more. Those relationships don’t work out. Then she comes back to the original man.A lady broke up with my friend because she said he was disturbing her too much for sex. After leaving him, she entered two separate relationships at different times and had sex with both men. Both relationships ended badly. She later tried to return to my friend.
The issue is not that she dated other men — that is her choice. The issue is this: How do you accuse a man and blame him for wanting sex, end a relationship because of it, and then turn around to willingly give even more sex to other men?
➜To my friend, this came across as dishonest justification for the breakup, a clear case of blaming him for something that was not really the problem,
➜ and an attempt to return only after discovering the grass was not greener elsewhere. Naturally, he no longer saw her the same way. Respect was lost, and attraction died.
➜ So my questions are straightforward: First, Isn’t it hypocritical to condemn a man for wanting sex, only to offer the same or more sex to others?
➜ Second, Why expect a man to accept you back after treating him like the problem?
➜ Don’t actions like this damage how a man values and respects you? This is not hatred. It is a real pattern I’ve observed, and it deserves honest conversation.

This is simple! As humans, we are not all sexually attracted to just about anyone, and even then, we may find ourselves no longer sexually attracted to people we once were. Just as some men lose sexual attraction to their wives after a period— some men also complain that their woman desires sex when they have none to give her— but would do anything for sex with a sidechick or some woman out there, the same applies to women. You really can't force these things. 🥱🥱

Be happy she at least left you instead of resorting to cheating on you with someone else she found more sexually appealing/attractive. 🥱🥱🥱

2. Suggest that your friend go get therapy immediately.

3. He should not see her the same way because that attempt to boomerang back to your friend afterwards was not out of love for your friend, but a desire to settle for what formerly existed while waiting for better to open up later down the road. Both men and women do this. It has nothing to do with the "Grass is not greener on the other side" nonsense people love to spew a lot in Africa. It is part of monkey-branching/rebound behavior.

4. It isn't hypocritical when men do it, and neither is it when women do it. A person can become no longer sexually attracted to someone they are in a relationship with due to many reasons.... quality of sex, hygiene, change in appearance(weight, health, etc.), abuse/violence in the relationship, change in general preferences, or hormonal changes...Nothing hypocritical about no longer sexually desiring someone you used to desire, only for you to have the same sort of desires for someone else entirely. 🥱🥱

5. Trying to convince a man/woman to take you back is simply that... trying to woo them over. It doesn't necessarily mean the one being wooed is loved or desired; likely, he/she is just the closest pushover for a lonely/anxious heart to cling to in the interim. 🥱🥱

6. Of what worth is this value and respect you are going on about now? If the man had been the one who dumped the woman for the same reason, and then came knocking at her door much later on, would you also be wailing about values and respect then too? 🙄🙄🙄

Wordsfrombimpe:
➜Trust me on this You will be fine 😊 All the best once again

Given your penchant for avoiding questions while pretending you speak sensibly, I can't and don't trust you.🥱🥱🥱

Wordsfrombimpe:
➜We have seen cases where the woman does that
➜ during the time her husband needs her the most
➜ Which brings me to the highlight of my point Support Your issue is you don’t read to understand and comprehend, I get your views but honestly Is all love Support is both ways and this topic for today is for the women All the best once again

You Nigerian government revealed in stats released on 2025 that females are breadwinners in almost 50% of marriages in Nigeria. Clearly, I am not referring to any of the cases you pretend there. I specifically asked about the case where the female is the breadwinner in the marriage, should the same assumption you made earlier apply? 🥱

2. You claimed that by merely paying the rent in the marriage, the man does everything in the marriage. However, now you suggest that when the man is, according to your argument, no longer doing everything, he needs the woman the most? Why?

3. When the man does everything, the woman is a nobody in the marriage, since you claim the man does everything. And when the man does nothing— not even able to keep a roof over his own family's head — you insist that it is the place of the woman who you earlier concluded does nothing, to support him? 🥱 🥱

Wordsfrombimpe:
➜You have already answer your question Once again all the best

Are you insinuating that paying rent, the man does everything? If so, what happens when the woman is the one paying the rent, feeding the family, and all else? Should the woman in that case not bother at all with the man's business ideas?

Wordsfrombimpe:
➜Who pays the rent You or the man When you answer this question I will give you my reply ?

Let's for the sake of this discussion accept that it is the man who pays the rent in the marriage. To that, I would then answer why should it matter who pays the rent? If the man paid rent before marriage, why should his continuing to do the same after marriage give him power over a woman or mean, to you, that he does everything in the marriage? 🥱🥱

Wordsfrombimpe:
➜You read to defend But you don’t read to comprehend Read my words carefully Also there is space for you to create your own thread and discuss further on your mentality This views of mine is strictly to encourage women to be supportive of their husband and that’s ok , like I stated earlier when I want to discuss on men being supportive towards their wives , I will write on that , once again , the article is strictly on supportive women
➜Being supportive as a wife is very essential In the home The man does everything and what is there in supporting him in his business by being there for him He is the head and you are the neck What’s the job of the neck if not to support the head Read to comprehend and all the best

1. The one who has gone on the defensive here is you. Look again at my retorts to see that what I posed were questions to help me better understand your logic begining with your OP. Instead of answering the questions, you have been going on the attack... wonder why?

2. Ah! The man does everything! Where does this notion of yours come from? Are you of the mind that the woman's contributions to the marriage, essentially keeping the home — a family home, is a business/company that requires running, after all—is inconsequential/of no worth to the man and the family? 🥱🥱🥱

Eniitankorede:
➜You are still ignorant. You expect BBC to give you evidence of coded secrets of Mosad? How naive could you be.
➜ Al Bagdadi is a native Jew of IraqI origin. They are sponsored by Mosad for Islamic education so as to lead ISIS.
➜ The only time ISIS mistakenly strayed into Gholan heights, they begged Isreal profusely for forgiveness. Did you see them attacking any Isreali sites? Everyone close to him knew he was of Jewish origin. You can’t get that on Google, okay!

1 Let me guess, the man's Wikipedia page, which confirms his ancestry, was also written by the BBC to spite Islam? 🥱🥱🥱

Al-Baghdadi was born on 28 July 1971 in Samarra, hence his nisba (onomastic) al-Samarra'i. He was born to a Sunni Arab family that belonged to the tribe of Al-Bu Badri, giving him another nisba al-Badri.[16] This tribe includes a number of sub-tribes, including the Radhawiyyah, Husseiniyyah, Adnaniyyah, and Quraysh.[6] Al-Baghdadi later claimed that he was descended from the Quraysh tribe and therefore related to Muhammad, although there was no evidence to back up his claim.[43][44][45]

He was the third of the four sons of Awwad Ibrahim, a religious cleric. According to a short semi-authorized biography written by Abu Humam al-Athari, his grandfather, Ibrahim Ali al-Badri, apparently lived until the age of 94 and witnessed the US occupation of Iraq.[43] His father, Awwad, was active in the religious life of the community.[32] Awwad taught the teenaged al-Baghdadi and got his own start as a teacher, leading children in a neighbourhood reciting the Quran.[32] Both his father and grandfather were said to be farmers.[43] His mother, whose name is not known, was described as a religious, loving person and was notable in the al-Badri tribe.[49] One of al-Baghdadi's uncles served in Saddam Hussein's security services, and one of his brothers became an officer in the Iraqi Army.[32] He has another brother, who probably died either during the Iran–Iraq War or the Gulf War while serving in the Iraqi military.[32][49] Al-Baghdadi was described as extremely conservative and religious even in his youth.[11]

2. And the tribe that he is from, confirmed to be a muslim arab tribe, is a Jewish one because you want to push away every fact out there in an attempt to save face for Islam?

Al-Badri is an Arab tribe in Iraq, predominantly based in Samarra, Diyala, and Baghdad. It is mostly a Sunni tribe of around 25,000 but has a small Shia minority of about 1,500

🥱🥱

3. It must be hard having to live in a bubble where denying all the facts known to the literal world today... Iraqis online have more than confirmed that the man was born into a muslim family and a predominantly muslim tribe...is the only way you can think to make sense of your religious delusions. 🥱🥱

Wordsfrombimpe:
✓ This perspective strictly focused on the women being supportive to their husband
✓ And if you disagree with the perspective it shows you don’t truly love the person
✓ When it’s time for me to talk about men being supportive to their wives I will get to that point later on for now this is focus on women being supportive to their husband and that should not be a bad thing at all

1. Why is your perspective focused on the woman giving to the man when marriage is meant to be a union of mutual benefits unless your particular view is such that the woman loses her place in humanity the moment she signs the dotted lines? 🥱🥱

2. What you are implying then is that a man who takes from his wife at the expense of her dreams is one who loves his wife? 🥱🥱

3. Ah, I see! Though the marriage contract suggest the man and woman are joined as one in the contract suggesting what benefits the one must also benefit the other, you would rather indicate the individuals should be kept separate were it concerns treatment and benefit in the marriage. 🥱🥱🥱

Fiscus105:
✓ I guess your own ideology is confrontational, by hook or by crook. (Nzobuzobu).
You will soon wake up from your trance

I see! Your particular blindness is of the religious kind. Ok! 🥱🥱🥱

Qasim6:
✓ I don't know where I say anything that implies I'm denying Jesus Christ claimed YHWH was his father.
But let me ask you this. Is Jesus as "son of God" the same across the 4 canonical gospels?

I would ask what gave you the impression that the Gospels do not all hold the same views regarding Jesus Christ of Israel being the Son of God? Where does this notion of yours come from? 🥱🥱

Wordsfrombimpe:
Dear Nigerian Women,
If you have a good Husband not the one that cheat on you , the one that is loyal and treat you like a Queen
Please do everything you can to support his business , if you can take extra miles please do that
Take his business like your own
✓ Forget the fact that I am single , I am not married 😂Just take the words seriously. Remember he is the head of the home and will need to pay bills and your bills. So do your part to add values to his finances. Do not act like I don’t care 🤷‍♀️ .Change that attitude today

Does this good husband take the wife's business like his own too or is it only the woman to support the man's business at the expense of her own business? 🥱🥱

2. Add values to his finances because the woman's own dreams and ambitions are of little to no worth in the same Marriage? 🥱🥱

Fiscus105:
Did you find yourself so much attached to your ex, and unable to detach yourself from thinking and loving him/her, even when him/her had moved on. Below are the steps you can take to stop loving him and open your heart for new relationship.
..
2. LIMIT CONTACT. You should endeavour to reduce calls, messages and social media interactions with him or her.
3. REMOVE TRIGGERS. This can be achieved if you try as much as possible delete away photos, gifts and reminders that can make you thinking about him/her.
4.PROCESS YOUR EMOTIONS. That's, you let go of yourself, any feelings of anger, guilty, sadness, betrayal or disappointment, in other to create new & open mind for next healthy relationship.
5.SET NEW GOALS. You now channel your energy into personal growth and career development and let go of past disappointment.
6.GIVE IT TIME. With time, every wound of betrayal and disappointment will heal, meanwhile, endeavour to quickly rush to new relationship, it can lead you to more disappointments or partner that would take advantage of your presence predicament.

So, basically, your idea is founded on using avoidance as the major tactic? 🥱🥱🥱

2. It is false to claim that time heals wounds. Time only gives you more opportunities to face and heal your own wounds -- your demons. It does not magically heal wounds or resolve unresolved issues. 🥱🥱🥱

Qasim6:
➜Which yeye eyes dey open? last I checked it's Christianity that is now suffering heavily with the availability of scholarly works here and there.
All we have been hearing before is eye witness accounts bla bla bla, now we know they are not so eye witness, more like hearsay and gossips written by unknowns or outright forgeries in some cases. You need to quit this strawmanning regarding how trinity is described in the Qur'an, it is not looking good on you, you are only exposing ur cluelessness and dishonesty
Qur'an does not anywhere define Trinity as Father, Mary and Jesus, what Qur'an does is condemn people worshipping Mary. Historically, there had been people that did that, even this present day some Christians venerate and pray to Mary, or you think a book that is so much about unity of God is wrong in condemning Christians that engaged in such act?
What Qur'an says concerning Trinity is "Do not say "trinity" stop for your own good." We know over the years there have been different from of trinity such as Modalism, Arianism, Tritheism and all different kinds, just name it. To know how bad it is, Tertullian the first to use the term would even have been an heretic as it is later defined by the nicene-constantinopolitan creed. What Qur'an is doing is condemning every form of trinity, even if you wish to add your own form (Father, Mary and Son) that you are trying very hard to impose on the Qur'an.

1. I am not here to hold brief for those of the Christian religion since that issue is left for the Christian section, which this thread is not on. I do have an issue with you denying the claim that Jesus Christ claimed that YHWH was His Father... He was literally referred to as "Son of God"... in the Gospels, which the Quran affirms. 🥱🥱🥱

So, is this an attempt by your person to deny the Quran or suggest that it is wrong to assert that the Quran is erroneous in affirming the Torah and the Gospels as truths?

Malagans:
➜I do that consistently and I'm serious about this. That's minus other needs that may come up before the Month ends.
If there's a Pressing need before Month end, I help and still fulfill the monthly allowance which is fixed

Do you do all this because you feel somewhat obligated? Or is this all from the kindness of your heart towards this mother of yours — something like, you make a lot of money, so you might as well spend on her?

Malagans:
➜I do that consistently and I'm serious about this

OK! That is good. Just stop investing any other energy into her at this point. Rather, pour your energy into healing yourself and your life from all the wounds she got you into. 🥱🥱🥱

2special:
E go soon reach your turn

So?

Malagans:
➜Thanks so much. I give her almost 38% of my entire monthly earnings

Hey, if you can afford to give her that much each month, that is fine too.

Mrdealer4all:
➜I don't feel pity for him. You came from a polygamous family. I know Your parents didn't give you the opportunity. Instead of you to pave way for your kids. You keep telling them no one train you

. There's got to be more to this story... at least the part about the why of the parents needing some sort of forgiveness from the child... than you are telling us here. 🥱🥱🥱

Forgive yourself at least for not having the best father and mother out there, and choose to move on— accept and heal from your childhood wounds and scars— so you don't end up rebooting the same pain and horrors against your own children or those around you. 🥱🥱🥱

AntiChristian:
➜But they are killing Kids like YHWH! Look at today's Israel?
➜ Na only direct slavery remains!
➜ Of course! The so called terrorists are by far better. Haven't you seen Samson whenever Holy Spirit enters him? He just goes on a killing spree! Na so Boko haram dey do!
➜ So which God do you represent wey never commands carnage?

Oh! So, your Allah, who affirmed the words given by YHWH to His people— bani Israil—, sent out his own people to go out killing folks as supposed as YHWH did? Is this how you explain why terrorists in Islam kill numerous muslims every single year in the name of Allah? 🥱🥱

2. Direct slavery? For the longest, Islam has been about exactly that... direct enslavement of all those who do not bow to its many different mandates. So, what in the world are you on about? Look at what is happening today in Iran. Are those being killed not considered Islamic slaves who deserve no freedom from their oppressors? 🥱🥱🥱

3. Oh, I see! The massacres of people across the world daily in the name of Islam are by far better than the killings carried out by the nation of Israel, courtesy of the commandments of their YHWH thousands of years ago. Now I get it! 🥱🥱

4. I don't represent any deity. However, I see that you represent Mohammed and his Allah well. You are indeed a product of Islam! 🥱🥱

AntiChristian:
✓ How do you know they have nothing to do with YHWH?
✓ They are doing less than the attrocities YHWH commanded
✓ and you no dey shame at all!

It is written right there in the books. 🥱🥱🥱

2. Wow!, we are comparing the works of Islamic terrorists to the God of Israel now? 🥱🥱🥱

3. I don't fight for YHWH...and I don't compare myself to YHWH. I can't pretend shame on behalf of a God of Israel. Same way I am not a representative for the Greek gods or the gods of Nigeria. 🥱🥱🥱

AntiChristian:
✓ Is this how you were taught to comprehend?

That is your comprehension turned around at you there. 🥱🥱🥱

Malagans:
...I don't know if this is how all mothers are. I don't know why God gave me this one. Sometimes I avoid her calls for weeks and even months, then she goes about reporting me to people, thereby making them feel like I'm irresponsible. When they ask me why I don't call or pick her calls, I can't explain the issue to them cos I see it as a family affair.
If I have money, I pick her calls and check on her, but anytime I'm broke, I don't call or pick her calls. This is because monetary demands will be made and I wouldn't want to explain my situation to her.
She'll say her Blood pressure is high because I don't pick her calls. Sometimes I just feel I'm being emotionally manipulated.

Your mother sounds like one of those who were conditioned to believe that their lives make no sense without a man -- men in this case believe that they need a woman to complete them -- and also that children are a retirement plan that ought to provide for them, not necessarily the other way around. There are lots of such mothers and fathers out there. And if you trace back, you might find that the cycle in their family did not begin with them either. 🥱🥱🥱

Yes, traditionally(religion included), Nigerians tend to raise terrible parents. And children are usually an afterthought, or should I say slaves, a sort of benefit that marriage provides to such parents.🥱🥱

Stop seeking worthless validation altogether from her and the people all around you, and focus your energy on giving yourself the life you were not given by both your father and your mother. If you can afford it, send her some pocket money each month -- limit her to that. More importantly, endeavor to get yourself professional mental health counseling to help you process and heal from all of the pain and hurts of your past, so you do not turn around and pick someone like your mother for a partner or inflict the same ills on your own children after all that. 🥱🥱

Generational curses are mental dissonance that result in our repeating the mistakes of those who hurt us. This happens when we try to cover up the pain instead of doing the hard work necessary to heal entirely from the wounds. 🥱🥱🥱

merrymike47:
I realize that I didn’t even answer your question. No woman will/wants to marry you without giving you babies, so your dad have to procreate.

That is a lie! Many women out there would rather be in relationships where they would not be required to procreate. There are many childfree couples out there, even today. 🥱🥱🥱

Peakdesign23:
✓ I was thinking about something lately and I want your honest opinions.
My mom and dad we're so in love, they birthed beautiful kids, both boys and girls, unfortunately, she died. Her story ended, it was a very sad moment for my family. 2 years after, he married again, not because he wanted companionship but probably because he wanted a brand new family.
✓ This is my question, why do men marry again and procreate even after their first wife gave them both genders?

They were so in love yet not long after she was gone, he desired a brand new family...a seek to shelve or erase the past? 🥱🥱🥱

2. Men remarry because they realize the energy that the woman-- note, not any particular woman but any woman---brings to the relationship, they cannot of their own give it or anything close to themselves and those around them. Only a handful of men even try to. 🥱🥱🥱