₦airaland Forum

Lifestylecom:
Easy please, Doc

I'll try sorry.

MaxInDHouse:
Never mind, by the time your neighbor that you both worship the same god is hunting your life due to POLITICS i will be in the same area freely preaching and teaching about God's Kingdom then you will know Religion is not the problem but politics!

Ah yes! To cap it off a delusional made up scenario that'll play out nowhere in reality but your head. See why the schizophrenic hat fits you guys so much. Go sit down, old man.

MaxInDHouse:
You wake up in the morning and believe bread will make your breakfast but i woke up and prefer rice what is the crime in that?
Where the problem lies is when i want to force rice down your throat or you want to force bread into my mouth claiming that's the best morning meal instead of allowing me to choose for myself.
That's what POLITICS does!

Here we go with the half baked obtuse analogies again. Go and sit down and educate urself. It'll help you stop talking nonsense.

Myrrhis:
Children are aware more than adults think.
Only they hardly know how to express what they think/feel.

Think about when you were a child.

Exactly. You're smart.

Mikespecialone:
What brain does he have at 5 ?? He’s even happy

@EmperorCaesar

By the time he understands this, he will no longer see it as a big deal. He will glide through life without really missing or inquiring about his Dad's death


You reason well

You couldn't be any more wrong.

dominique:
Why would anybody ask a young child what killed their parent? Are people really that nosy?

Lack of empathy and like you said, nosy so they have something to gossip about. Ws in the exact same shoes as this boy, finally decided to make up stories when they ask questions.

MaxInDHouse:
There is no confusion in religion it's either you believe or disbelieve the main issue is POLITICS as those who want to dominate others are desperately seeking ways to blindfold gullible people so they can gather such ones to fight for their own personal interest!

😅Always talking op. No confusion in religion because every religious person believes the exact same thing right?! mtsheww!

Lifestylecom:
God is indeed not an author of confusion

Indeed he only sends confusing messages so his people fight and kill each other over whose interpretation in right. Hallelujah.

One of the biggest ironies is that "god is not an author of confusion". WTH!

No questions asked, the rapture as has been described is absolutely real, that is if you're schizophrenic, haven't tak3n your meds and are in a state of hardcore psychosis. So yes its real.

sonmvayina:
I am still waiting for your evidence on the historicity of Jesus... I will not stop chasing you till you present the evidences you talked about..

Ignorant and confident, very dangerous combo typical of close minded folks.  Anyways let me use a fine comb to comb said ignorance and school you. I'll start with Dr Bart Ehrman which you confidently, amusingly and ignorantly claimed to support a position which if you just took a couple of secs to educate urself would have found contradicts the claim you were making, least i forget the hilarious mention of Kenneth Humphreys.  I already cited one of Dr Bart's works up there "Misquoting Jesus" as a source.

In addition his books "Did Jesus Exist" and "Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet Of The New Millennium" further addresses and asserts the historicity of Jesus. Bart had this to say in a 2011 review of the state of modern scholarship on the subject matter, Ehrman wrote: "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees." Reputable historian James Dunn also writes: "Today nearly all historians, whether Christians or not, accept that Jesus existed.

Other notable scholars like Maurice Casey of University of Nottingham in his book "Jesus: Evidence and Argument or Mythicist Myths?" addresses the mythicist claim that Jesus didn't exist. Funny thing is the question of historicity was generally settled in scholarship in the early 20th century, before you even thought to exist.
Mark Smith, John Meier, Paula Frederiksen and Helen Bond amongst others have all supported this consensus view in their various works. So anyone still questioning this at this time obviously doesn't know what they're saying and are not to be taken seriously...

Seems my comment educating ignorant folks was removed for being too long or something or maybe too many sources😅. Anyways i'd try pasting it again in smaller chunks.

Thoth02:
Nonsense to a person who cannot come up with with something to refute me.

I don't expect you to believe that there is more than one God.

I be shocked if you believe me. You were brainwashed from your childhood.

How can you easily let go of what you were taught ever since you were a child.

The thing is where do you even begin to pick apart what's obviously garbage. If i were brainwashed i would most likely come up with the garbage you did up there, that has no basis in reality and pat my self on the back, cause it seems more nuanced in my binary thinking than another similar set of garbage. Do you have reputable sources and irrefutable proof for what you spouted up there? No?! Then it, as well as that which you refute is absolute garbage, once again no offense😁.

Thoth02:
The God that run human affairs is not the God you think.

"Let us" make man who was talking and who was being spoken to.?
Oh please don't tell me God is talking to the holy spirit Or to the angels.

Angels don't have the image of the Gods.

If God being male created humans, how are there females.

These Gods mate and procreate same way humans do and they give birth to children who are in turn Gods.
That was Jesus was born - Revelations 12.

The God who told man not to eat the fruit so they couldn't have knowledge is Enlil/yahuah father of Jesus whom christians worship.

The God who made man to eat the fruit and gain knowledge is Enki - another God who is kind to humans.

The snake in the Garden is not the devil.
Contrary to what you were taught in church.

Ever wondered why there are two trees in the garden.?? it's because those trees represent the nature of the two Gods who created man.

The snake is not the devil - open your mind all right.

Everytime, you say Amen in church, you call the name of a God - Amen Ra multiple Gods have ruled since time past. Which the bible didn't talk about.

The bible is simply the summary of the ancient text.

No offense but this is pure nonsense.

All roads point to incest, something YHVH hates ironically but doesn't mind using when it suits his agenda, even though there's simplier solutions to prevent dealing with something as bad as incest that he claims to hate. Anyways these were still early stages for creative fictional. writing so there's bound to be plot holes especially when its different writers with different worldviews.

sonmvayina:
Keep up young man.

I made a comment that the Jesus character is a myth because it has all the elements of mythology..like virgin birth, which is also shared by Perseus, Hercules, Bacchus etc.
Hope you are not being deceived by the two contradictory genealogy in mathew and Luke, that invented a human history for him. If really he was sired by the holy Spirit, what is the purpose of the genealogy ? That should be a red flag.
The Torah on the other side was written by Ezra and the priests when they left the Babylonian exile.(Not by Moses) Much of the material used where from Babylonian mythology. Like I always say, the stories are the same, the only difference is who is telling it...the Jews adapted much of Babylonian stories and included them as part of their belief system...
There are a lot of mistranslation in the Christian Bible...example include Allah for virgin in Isaiah 7:14. Isaiah was referring to his wife who was with child and somehow the author of the gospel according to Mathew mistranslated it, for Jesus...

Jesus never existed...that's fact.

Like i said fact doesn't care what you believe. Flat earthers till this day believe the earth's flat even when they can't prove it. Who cares what they believe, we know the facts. So it doesn't even matter what you say, it's already what it is and can be backed anywhere by brilliant scholary peer reviewed research from top institutions the world over. You keep jumping from one to another without even defending some of the funny(i'm trying not to use the words ludicrous and baseless) stuff u've spouted without virtually any reputable source or proof, just more spouting.

The only 'proof' or 'source' you managed to bring just happened to contradict what you said, which is ironic as fvck. Now its Ezra wrote the torah 🤦 like wtf. Anyways like i said Jesus existed and no reputable scholar goes against that. That's what matter not randos on the internet without any proof or peer review spouting any ludicrous thing. Fact's are backed by evidence, reputable sources and peer reviews, not baseless unverifiable claims.

PheelzAlmighty:
After these women will be forming like they don't need a man...
This one fit still follow for men are scum crew
Men are gods, the real price.
Dea+h to all simps💀

Look at her username 'Matriarch'. She dumped feminism quickly, praying for and happy at obtaning scum.

sonmvayina:
Fact remains Jesus belongs to mythology same as Moses, Abraham...I am not excluding anyone ..

The only reason they where written is for us to read the story and learn the messages they contain.
The Torah is still about the two brothers..
Enki = Jacob
Enlil = Esau...
So when Christians decided to mistranslate the text just to deceive, that fact is what I am pointing out...

.

I'm sure you know what mythology means. How can someone who we are sure of his historicity be part of mythology, the fact historical figures get mythological elements added to narratives about them doesn't make them mythological, YHVH's what you call mythological not Jesus.

I don't necessarily care why they were written as its full of historical inaccuracies and contradiction after contradiction. It's always obvious when somone uses random youtube sources cause that's how they come up with ludicrous stuff like enlil = jacob without any reputable sources or historical or textual evidence. Lay off the youtube source, its garbage.

Lastly saying christains mistranslate the texts is funny, when there's virtually no objective interpretation of the texts. Everyone comes to their own subjective conclusions cause there's nothing objective about it, circularlly at least, one book(thats not even considering the different versions) several religions and denomination. Where's this objective translation that is been mistranslated, lol and how does mistranslation equals Jesus didn't exist. Like i said you are everywhere. You should take your own advice.

sonmvayina:
Why don't you read the book by Kenneth Humphreys "Jesus never existed" to update your knowledge.
He never existed bro...

He being born with no input from a human father should be a red flag for any body with half a brain. No to talk of the two contradictory genealogy in Mathew and Luke...so may holes in the story.

😅 Kenneth Humphreys! Really! You just made my point. So first you cite Dr Bart, a reputable renowned scholar to support your claim because you saw a random pic without even understanding the context, and then attibuted it that he supports said claim, when in fact the reverse is the case. Which is funny in itself, i then tell you the academic consensus and that almost if not all reputable scholars subscribe to this consensus.

You then mention Humphreys, who has limited info on his academic credentials, no apparent affiliation with any reputable academic institutions or even engagement with the academic community, which has largely ignored or criticized his work. Even Carrier, a mythicist who you mentioned earlier has described Humphreys work as amateurish. So it's funny you mention him all in a bid to cling to bias.

That's the thing about consensus fact though, it doesn't care if you believe or not, it just is. The fact there are people who believe the earth is flat won't make the earth flat. Your bias is leading you all over the place. Fact remians there was a 'historical' Jesus. Myths about him being born of a virgin or what not have nothing to do with this fact. And its also ironic and funny you believe in part 1 of the book and call part 2 fiction when the whole book is same.

tsdarkside:
why didnt they run to ukraine people....??

It's obvious no one read the article, headline's a bit misleading. They didn't necessarily run away, they were abandoned at an outpost with clear instructions or food. So after their resources depleted they had to move.

sonmvayina:
He is s scholar in religious studies....

An associate professor...

One of the best in Bible history.

Same with professor Richard Carrier...

Read their books...and educate yourself..

Maybe you should educate urself better. Bart is not a mythicist and doesn't subscribe to the view Jesus never existed. The biblical academic scholarly consensus is that there was a historical Jesus, a position Bart himself holds. Mythicists like Carrier are among a minor minority who go against the consensus. So there was a historical Jesus, a pic of a quote taken out of context does nothing to change this, you could check out his 'Misquoting Jesus' amongst other books or his blog or podcast. Infact you'd be hard pressed to find a reputable scholar that supports your claim save for mythicists, so refer bk to first sentence.

Omooba77:
Without the Church, Nigeria would have been worse than this.

Who's your crack dealer?

let me fix your question for you... "Why do other religions show more love among themselves than christainity the Abrahamic religions" ...cause they are all the same corroded can with different colours of paint pretending to be unique. The answer to your question?! Well when you read the texts of any of the 3, you find out how much selfishness and prioritizing of self is propped up and how much empathy's most times dismissed, even though they're written in such a way to disguise that fact.

If satan was real and i saw him/her/it/they/them, i would empathize with her for all the false accusations. Satan didn't commit genocide, infanticide or permit sexual assault or slavery. The little chaos he orchestrated was with the permission of his supposedly benovelent buddy.

Yahweh: "What 'cha doing, Satan?"
Satan: "Just out for a walk on earth"
Yahweh: "Hey, I know a guy named Job. He's pretty cool."
Satan: "Yeah, but would he be as cool if we ruined his life?"
Yahweh: "You son of a bitch, I'm in!"

Krismas:
What hinders an animal anatomically and physiologically from speaking? Very dumb! Thing is, I detest arrogant people. They think they know something, talking condescendingly down on others, when Infact, they are the ones preposterous!
Thanks and bye. U won!

Maybe, just maybe educate urself better ✌🏾

Edojoma:
Lol,, don't worry my man,, it's my fault.

Thought I was having a rational conversation with a mature mind. I'm so sorry, take care bro. One love

Stfu! Hypocrite.

Krismas:
Animals speak. There is nothing obtuse about it.
Nam Chimpsky was able to tell it’s handlers how it’s mother was killed by poachers.
U are the one dat need to stop being obtuse

My dog communicates with me when he wants to eat and take a shit ergo animals can speak. It understands me when it hears i want to go out and comes clinging ergo animals can speak. It understands me when i tell it to fetch my pillow when I'm curled on my sofa ergo animals can speak. A gorilla gets taught sign language and communicates in sign language, ergo animals can speak. Ws willing to let the mimicry of a parrot slide so as not too be pedantic and then gave my previous analogy but you had to bring up something even more obtuse. That's not even considering the anatomical and physiological limitations that make it impossible or the crappy false equivalence even. Damn! The number of daft people on this forum is too damn high. No surprise the country's a shithole. Please show me videos of these animals "speaking" 🤡

Edojoma:
U r are right, to us , humanity is sacred,we ain't religious fanatics.

95% of all terrorist groups in d world are muslims/islam. Yet u are bothered abt it. U didn't make any point, just vague grammical expressions.

U will say all muslims are not terrorists, yet all terrorists are muslims. I av written a lot on this religious tolerance. And presented seminars as well. U don't av any point bro, just shut d Bleep up and acknowledged d short coming of ur religion.

Dafuq do i care if most terrorists are from islam, its the same Abrahamic daft nonsense like ur christainity, used to purport violence all over, same coin different sides. Of course when you believe in ludicrous, archaic and daft texts that have no single proof in reality like the quran and the bible, you are bound to practice the delusions contained within and become a full blown schizophrenic nutjob urself, case in point, you😄.

Eat from a bowl of shit then delude urself your breath smells nicer than someone else eating from a different bowl of shit forgetting you're all eating shit no matter the bowl. If that isn't the zenith of absolute stupidity, then 2 must be a prime no. You still have the chance to save what little brain matter you have left from the amount of shit you've consumed, so simple points and vocab dont fly over your airhead.✌🏾

angelboy01:
Gibberish, e no get head he no get tail just spewing gibberish.

Of course its gibberish for an airhead whose last 2 brain cells are fighting for third place. 😄

Krismas:
Let me be more specific.
Nim Chimpsky and Koko are just to mention a few.

A chameleon changes colour ergo a dog or rabbit can change colour, don't be obtuse 🙄