Lukgaf's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lukgaf's Profile › Lukgaf's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 98 pages)
As for putting one’s hand on the Mushaf or inside it, this is an innovated thing which some people do for emphasis to warn the one who is swearing the oath against lying. Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about the ruling on swearing by the Mushaf. He (may Allaah have mercy on him) replied: It is not permissible to make vows or swear oaths except by Allaah or by one of His attributes. If a person swears by Allaah, may He be glorified and exalted, then there is no need to bring the Mushaf for him to swear on it, because swearing on the Mushaf was not done at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or at the time of the Sahaabah; even after the Mushaf was compiled in book form they did not swear on it, rather a person would swear by Allaah without swearing on the Mushaf. End quote from Fataawa Noor ‘ala al-Darb. It says in a statement of the Islamic Fiqh Council: 2 – It is not essential for the person who is swearing the oath to place his hand on the Mushaf, Torah or Gospel when swearing for his oath to be valid, but it is permissible if the judge deems it essential so as to warn the one who is swearing the oath against lying. 3 – It is not permissible for the Muslim to place his hand on the Torah or Gospel when swearing an oath, because these copies that are in circulation are distorted and that are not in the original form that was revealed to Moosa and ‘Eesa (peace be upon them), and because the sharee’ah with which Allaah sent His Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has abrogated the laws that came before it. End quote from Fataawa Islamiyyah (3/463) Secondly: If a person swears an oath then he cannot fulfil that oath, he has to offer expiation. The expiation for breaking an oath (kafaarat yameen) here. https://www.nairaland.com/4350191/kafaarat-yameen-expiation-breaking-vow#65093518 And Allaah knows best. https://islamqa.info/en/98194 |
Praise be to Allaah. Firstly: An oath is not binding unless it is sworn by one of the names of Allaah or by one of His attributes. Swearing on the Qur’aan is swearing by the word of Allaah which is one of His attributes. As for swearing by the Mushaf, if what is meant is the words of Allaah contained therein, then it is an Islamically acceptable oath, but if what is meant is the paper and ink, then it is an oath by something other than Allah, which is shirk, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever swears by something other than Allaah has committed an act of kufr or shirk.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (1535) and Abu Dawood (3251); classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Tirmidhi. Hence it is better not to swear by the Mushaf, because the Mushaf contains the words of Allaah, and it contains paper and ink. |
Q&A: His Wife Accused His Mother Of Stealing Her Ring! https://www.nairaland.com/4350158/q-wife-accused-mother-stealing#65093212 |
source: https://islamqa.info/en/185208 |
To sum up: Your wife is not sinning if she thought that about your mother, so long as your mother is known for that or there is circumstantial evidence to that effect. In that case, what you must do is keep them apart in a wise manner. If your wife has any proof for what she is saying, then try to find out the truth from your mother using wise means and tricks. But if she does not have any proof and your mother denies that she took it, then there is nothing wrong with you asking her to swear an oath to that effect. In fact this is something that is prescribed in Islam. The shar‘i principle is that proof is required from the one who makes the claim and the oath is required from the one who denies it. In that case, there is no blame on you, in sha Allah, for what you did of asking your mother to swear an oath. In fact this may reduce the possibility of problems and resentment between them. But if you feel that your wife is telling the truth and that your mother’s feelings may be hurt by that, then try to compensate her for it by showing kindness and using tricks, and try harder with your mother to encourage her to repent to Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, and to stop doing such things. Try harder to suffice her and take care of her so that she has no need to do such things. Ruling on swearing with Mushaf can be found https://www.nairaland.com/4350171/ruling-swearing-mushaf-expiation-breaking#65093331 And Allah knows best. |
Ash-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Thinking of others may be divided into two categories: The first category is thinking well of others, which requires you to think positively of your brothers so long as they are deserving of that. This applies to the Muslim who appears outwardly to be of good character; such a person is to be thought well of and praised for what we can see of his commitment to Islam and good deeds. The second category is thinking badly of others (suspicion). This is haram in the case of a Muslim who appears outwardly to be of good character; it is not permissible to think badly of him or suspect him, as the scholars have clearly stated. They (may Allah have mercy on them) said: It is haram to think badly of a Muslim who appears outwardly to be of good character. With regard to thinking badly of someone for whom circumstantial evidence indicates that he deserves to be thought of in such a manner, there is no blame on the individual if he thinks badly of him. Hence a popular proverb says: “Be on your guard against people by thinking badly of them.” But this is not applicable in all cases, as is well known. Rather what is meant is be on your guard against people who deserve to be badly thought of, so do not trust them. A person will inevitably find thoughts coming to mind reflecting suspicion of anyone concerning whom circumstantial evidence justifies that, either because there are signs of that in his face, as you can see a frown and displeasure on his face at meeting you, and the like, or because of his situation and what people know about him or the things that he says, so he is ill thought of. In such a case, if there is circumstantial evidence to suggest it, there is no blame on a person if he thinks badly of him or suspects him. End quote from Tafseer Soorat al-Hujurat (49) |
Secondly: It is not permissible for a Muslim to accuse his fellow Muslim or cast aspersions upon his honour merely on the basis of suspicion. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “O you who believe! Avoid much suspicions, indeed some suspicions are sins. And spy not, neither backbite one another. Would one of you like to eat the flesh of his dead brother? You would hate it (so hate backbiting) . And fear Allah. Verily, Allah is the One Who accepts repentance, Most Merciful” [al-Hujuraat 49:12]. Al-Bukhari (5144) and Muslim (2563) narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Beware of suspicion, for suspicion is the falsest of speech. Do not spy on one another; do not seek out one another’s faults; do not hate one another; and be, O slaves of Allah, brothers.” Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said in Fath al-Bari (10/486): The prohibition applies to suspicion regarding a Muslim who is sound in his religious commitment and honour. End quote. Al-Qurtubi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: What distinguishes the suspicion that must be avoided from other kinds of suspicion is that every suspicion for which you know of no clear sign or obvious reason is haram and must be avoided. This applies if the person who is suspected is one of those who are known for dignity and righteousness, and is apparently trustworthy. Suspecting evil and treachery on his part is haram. This is in contrast to one who is well known among people for indulging in suspicious activities and who openly commits evil deeds. End quote from Tafseer al-Qurtubi (16/331) |
Question: My wife accused my mother of stealing her ring, and insists that this is the case. I asked my mother to swear an oath on the Mushaf without my wife’s knowledge, in secret. Was I sinning by my action? Please note that my mother has a habit of stealing. |
Johannesburg – Jacob Zuma has resigned as president of South Africa. "I have...come to the decision to resign as the president of the republic with immediate effect," Zuma told reporters at the Union Buildings on Wednesday night. Zuma's time as president has been marked by controversy, ranging from his relationship with the controversial Gupta family, dropped charges of corruption and his acquittal on a charge of rape, to the upgrades to his Nkandla homestead. He broke his silence on Wednesday afternoon for the first time since discussions to oust him started in a televised live interview with SABC. The ANC caucus met on Wednesday morning on the outcomes of a meeting of the party's national executive committee (NEC). ANC treasurer-general Paul Mashatile told the media afterward that they had given Zuma until Wednesday to resign. If not, the ANC would proceed with a motion of no confidence against him on Thursday to legally force him to resign according to the Constitution, he said. ANC secretary general Ace Magashule and his deputy Jessie Duarte delivered Zuma’s recall letter to the presidential guesthouse on Tuesday morning. Zuma's much-anticipated resignation comes after the party’s highest decision-making body, the national executive committee (NEC), decided after a marathon meeting into the early hours of Tuesday morning that he should go. The ANC called the urgent meeting following ANC president Cyril Ramaphosa's direct talks with Zuma. An emergency NEC meeting, that was meant to happen last Wednesday, was cancelled by Ramaphosa after his Tuesday meeting with Zuma. Ramaphosa replaced Zuma as leader of the ANC at its elective conference in December. On Tuesday last week, Parliament's presiding officers postponed Thursday's State of the Nation Address (SONA) amid fears that it might descend into chaos. "We wish to assure fellow South Africans and everyone affected by this decision that these actions are being taken in the best interests of Parliament and the country," National Assembly Speaker Baleka Mbete announced at the time. https://m.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/jacob-zuma-resigns-as-president-of-south-africa-20180214 Cc: Lalasticlala Mynd44
|
Don't let Cultural Challenges make you immodest and vulgar person https://www.nairaland.com/4336941/dont-let-cultural-challenges-make#64892837 |
Differences in individual modesty, in accordance with the wills of Allah, have impact of the culture we were raised in. Culture either nurtures modesty or destroys it. Apparently, modesty is a generally acceptable character in all cultures for it is believed that immorality is incited by immodest. But what is modest in a culture may be immodest in another. Some cultures see nothing wrong in premarital sex; in fact, it is part of requirements of some families or cultures for the lady to become pregnant before marriage. In another detested case of immodest, young boy will impregnate a young girl and reject the pregnant with boastfulness….but why? If you asked, hmmmm..her parent has no manner of talking. Then, people will start begging him to accept the pregnant (and may be with the lady) Subhaanallah! Are the perpetrators so powerful that they cannot be punished? Nooooo! The community or culture is pleased with the injustice. The media (especially social media) and people in the community keep claiming that our Muslimaat (Muslim Ladies) are not beautiful enough because they cover their body in obedience to Allah and His messenger. Today, ladies only seem to be valued for their bodies and not their brains and many have compromised by uncovering the body in the public for the flimsy assertion of the agents of devil in the media…Many are pleased with the abuses that almost everything to be advertised needs half naked woman. Today we come across people who are dressed but still they are naked. People who work in films and advertising industry wearing see-through dresses, indulging in shameful chitchat with people especially opposite gender arouse sexual passions of the public and the viewers, and they seems not to be ashamed. Does what you see in the media or society makes you feel bad about your size, color, shape, Islamic dresses…? Glorified be His Name the Best Creator. Have you started wearing short, tight dresses and uploading your prance pictures on internet? And what have you gained in return? Multifaceted problems! Agents of devil have been struggling to bring Muslim men and women out of modesty into immodesty and indecency. Now, vulgarity and all its ingredients have become commonplace even among Muslims in the zeal of imitating the non-believers. The unrefined one among us are now using the opportunity of the so called civilized or modernized Islamic way of preaching to promote immoralities. * Muslims are feeling ashamed to reject opposite sex handshakes! If you asked him/her why? I don’t want them to see me as an extremist or uncivilized – Imagine! * Muslims bride and groom are not ashamed to offer kiss to another in front of the crowd! Ask them why? * Muslims bride and groom are not ashamed to dance for the participant! And it happened in the mosque sometimes, subhaanallah! * Muslim lady is not ashamed of campaigning in front of men, and even sing and dance with them! And women were not created for such, hence, much dissimilarity can be easily noticed but one with highest immorality among them may perform better. * Muslims are not ashamed of singing, dancing, hugging, kissing, …in the name of acting (in the movies) to educate the masses – Subhaanallah! Malik b Uhaimir reported that he heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) saying that, “Allah (subhaanahu wa ta’ala) will not accept any good deeds or worship of an immodest and vulgar person.” We asked, “Who is an immodest and vulgar person?” He replied, “A man whose wife entertains non-mahram men.” Go though over this, May Allah grant us understanding of His words http://fiqhclass.org/index.php/2017/09/30/al-hayaa-modesty-no-modesty-no-faith-8-of-9/ |
What Is Required Of Widower Mourning Her Husband Demise According to the four Modhaabs https://www.nairaland.com/4336922/what-required-widower-mourning-husband#64892572 |
Lukgaf:Answer: Praise be to Allah What this woman has told you, and attributed it to the Hanafi madhhab – that the recently-widowed woman only has to refrain from remarrying, and that anything other than that, such as adorning herself, is permissible for her and there is no blame on her if she does it – is not correct. The Hanafi fuqaha’ have stated that the recently-widowed woman must refrain from adorning herself. As-Samarqandi said in Tuhfat al-Fuqaha’ (2/251): Explanation of mourning: it means avoiding everything that women adorn themselves with, such as putting on perfume, wearing clothing that has been dyed with safflower or saffron, putting kohl on their eyes, using skin creams, combing their hair, wearing jewellery, dyeing their hair, and so on. End quote. In Tabyeen al-Haqaa’iq Sharh Kanz ad-Daqaa’iq by az-Zayla‘i (3/34), it says: The recently-widowed woman observes mourning by refraining from adornment, perfume, kohl, skin cream (unless she has a legitimate excuse to use it), henna, and clothes dyed with safflower and saffron, if she is an adult and Muslim. That is because of the words of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him): “It is not permissible for a woman who believes in Allah and the Last Day to mourn for more than three days for someone who has died, except in the case of a husband, in which case she should observe mourning for him for four months and ten days; she should not wear kohl, or wear any dyed garment …, or use perfume except when she purifies herself [following menses], a little qust or azfaar [types of perfume].” Agreed upon. And he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “The woman whose husband has died should not wear clothes dyed with safflower, or jewellery, or dye her hair, or use kohl.” Narrated by Ahmad, Abu Daawood and an-Nasaa’i. End quote. The Hanafi fuqaha’ regard it as permissible for the recently-widowed woman to go out during the day for necessary purposes, such as earning a living, seeking medical treatment, and the like, on condition that she go home at night and spend the night at home. It says in al-Bahr ar-Raa’iq Sharh Kanz ad-Daqaa’iq wa Minhat al-Khaaliq (4/166): The recently-widowed woman may go out during the day and part of the night in order to earn a living… But it is not permissible for her to go out to visit other people or for any other purpose, whether by night or by day. To sum up: the only reason for which she is allowed to go out is for necessary business or errands; once she done what she needs to, it is not permissible for her after that to spend time outside her house. End quote. Al-Kaasaani said: With regard to the recently-widowed woman, she should not go out at night, but there is nothing wrong with her going out during the day for necessary purposes, such as if she needs to go out during the day to earn enough to cover her expenses, because she has no maintenance from her deceased husband; rather she is responsible for her own maintenance, so she needs to go out in order to earn that money. But she should not go out at night, because there is no need for her to go out at night. This is in contrast to the recently-divorced woman, whose ex-husband is responsible for her maintenance, so she has no need to go out. End quote from Badaa’i‘ as-Sanaa’i‘ fi Tarteeb ash-Sharaa’i‘ (3/205). With regard to staying in the house and avoiding adornment during the ‘iddah period, there is virtual consensus among the four madhhabs. In the case of the Maalikis, Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr said in al-Kaafi fi Fiqh Ahl al-Madinah (2/622): Mourning is obligatory for the one whose husband has died, until her ‘iddah is complete, either in terms of the requisite number of months or when her pregnancy ends. Mourning means avoiding everything with which women adorn themselves, such as jewellery, cosmetics, kohl, dyeing the hair, or coloured or white garments worn for the purpose of adornment. ... As for jewellery, rings and so on, it is not permissible for the woman who is in mourning to wear them. The same applies to all kinds of perfume. If she has no choice but to use kohl, she should apply it at night and remove it during the day. She should not use any kind of perfumed oils. As for things that are not used for the purpose of beautification, there is nothing wrong with the woman who is in mourning using them. End quote. In the case of the Shaafa‘is, Abu Ishaaq ash-Shiraazi said in at-Tanbeeh fi’l-Fiqh ash-Shaafa‘i (1/201): Mourning means avoiding adornment. So she (the woman who is in mourning) should not wear jewellery, put on perfume, dye her hair, style her hair, or use kohl made of antimony. If she needs to use kohl, she should apply it at night and wash it off during the day. She should not wear red or bright blue. She should not go out of her house unnecessarily, and if she wants to go out for some necessary purpose, it is not permissible to do that at night. It is permissible for the recently-widowed woman to go out to meet her needs during the day. End quote. In the case of the Hanbalis, Ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdisi said in ‘Umdat al-Fiqh (1/107): Chapter on Mourning: It (mourning) is obligatory for the woman whose husband has died, and it means avoiding adornment, perfume, kohl made of antimony, and the wearing of dyed clothes for the purpose of beautification .… She should stay at night in her house in which she is obliged to observe ‘iddah and where she is living, if possible. End quote. And Allah knows best. https://islamqa.info/en/230456 |
Clarification according to the four Modhaab |
Questions: My husband died a short while ago, and I am now in the ‘iddah period, aadhering to what is required during this time. A few days ago I spoke to the mother of one of my friends, and she said that for them in Turkey, the matter is somewhat different with regard to the woman in ‘iddah, and that the only thing she must refrain from is getting married, and nothing else; as for other matters, such as putting on perfume, adorning herself, or going out for necessary purposes, they do not see anything wrong with that. She attributed this to the Hanafi madhhab that the people in that country follow. Is what she said correct? Is there a difference of opinion among the fuqaha’ of the four madhhabs concerning the ‘iddah of a recently-widowed woman? I would like to know these details, not only for myself, but so that I can offer advice to that woman. |
Ruling On Celebrating Valentine Day https://www.nairaland.com/4336904/ruling-celebrating-valentine-day |
Praise be to Allaah. Firstly: Valentine’s Day is a jaahili Roman festival, which continued to be celebrated until after the Romans became Christian. This festival became connected with the saint known as Valentine who was sentenced to death on 14 February 270 CE. The kuffaar still celebrate this festival, during which immorality and evil are practised widely. Secondly: It is not permissible for a Muslim to celebrate any of the festivals of the kuffaar, because festivals come under the heading of shar’i issues which are to be based on the sound texts. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Festivals are part of sharee’ah, clear way and rituals of which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “To each among you, We have prescribed a law and a clear way” [al-Maa’idah 5:48] “For every nation We have ordained religious ceremonies which they must follow” [al-Hajj 22:67] -- such as the qiblah (direction faced in prayer), prayer and fasting. There is no difference between their participating in the festival and their participating in all other rituals. Joining in fully with the festival is joining in with kufr, and joining in with some of its minor issues is joining in with some of the branches of kufr. Indeed, festivals are one of the most unique features that distinguish various religions and among their most prominent symbols, so joining in with them is joining in with the most characteristic and prominent symbols of kufr. No doubt joining in with this may lead to complete kufr. Partially joining in, at the very least, is disobedience and sin. This was indicated by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) when he said: “Every people has its festival and this is our festival.” This is worse than joining them in wearing the zinaar (a garment that was worn only by ahl al-dhimmah) and other characteristics of theirs, for those characteristics are man-made and are not part of their religion, rather the purpose behind them is simply to distinguish between a Muslim and a kaafir. As for the festival and its rituals, this is part of the religion which is cursed along with its followers, so joining in with it is joining in with something that is a cause of incurring the wrath and punishment of Allaah. End quote from Iqtida’ al-Siraat al-Mustaqeem (1/207). He also said (may Allaah have mercy on him): It is not permissible for the Muslims to imitate them in anything that is uniquely a part of their festivals, whether it be food, clothing, bathing, lighting fires, refraining from a regular habit, doing acts of worship or anything else. It is not permissible to give a feast or to give gifts, or to sell anything that will help them to do that for that purpose, or to allow children and others to play games that are part of the festivals, or to wear one’s adornments. To conclude: the Mulsims should not do any of their rituals at the time of their festivals; rather the day of their festival should be like any other day for the Muslims. The Muslims should not do anything specific in imitation of them. End quote from Majmoo al-Fataawa (25/329). Al-Haafiz al-Dhahabi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: If the Christians have a festival, and the Jews have a festival, it is only for them, so no Muslim should join them in that, just as no Muslim should join them in their religion or their direction of prayer. End quote from Tashabbuh al-Khasees bi Ahl al-Khamees, published in Majallat al-Hikmah (4/193) The hadeeth to which Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah referred was narrated by al-Bukhaari (952) and Muslim (892) from ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her) who said: Abu Bakr came in and there were two young girls of the Ansaar with me who were singing about what had happened to the Ansaar on the day of Bu’aath. She said: And they were not (professional) singing girls. Abu Bakr said: “Musical instruments of the shaytaan in the house of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)?!” and that was on the day of Eid. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “O Abu Bakr, every people has a festival and this is our festival.” Abu Dawood (1134) narrated that Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: When the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) came to Madeenah, they had two days when they would play. He said: “What are these two days?” They said: “We used to play on these days during the Jaahiliyyah.” The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Allaah has given you instead of them two days that are better than them: the day of al-Adha and the day of al-Fitr.” This hadeeth was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. This indicates that festivals are among the characteristics by which nations are distinguished, and it is not permissible to celebrate the festivals of the ignorant and the mushrikeen (polytheists). The scholars have issued fatwas stating that it is haraam to celebrate Valentine’s Day. 1 –Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: In recent times the celebration of Valentine’s Day has become widespread, especially among female students. It is a Christian festival where people dress completely in red, including clothes and shoes, and they exchange red flowers. We hope that you can explain the ruling on celebrating this festival, and what your advice is to Muslims with regard to such matters; may Allaah bless you and take care of you. He replied: Celebrating Valentine’s Day is not permissible for a number of reasons. 1- It is an innovated festival for which there is no basis in Islam. 2- It promotes love and infatuation. 3- It calls for hearts to be preoccupied with foolish matters that are contrary to the way of the righteous salaf (may Allaah be pleased with them). It is not permissible on this day to do any of the things that are characteristic of this festival, whether that has to do with food, drinks, clothing, exchanging gifts or anything else. The Muslim should be proud of his religion and should not be a weak character who follows every Tom, Dick and Harry. I ask Allaah to protect the Muslims from all temptations, visible and invisible, and to protect us and guide us. End quote from Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (16/199) 2 – The Standing Committee was asked: Some people celebrate Valentine’s Day on the fourteenth of February every year. They exchange gifts of red roses and wear red clothes and congratulate one another. Some bakeries make red coloured sweets and draw hearts on them, and some stores advertise products that are especially for this day. What is your opinion on the following: 1- Celebrating this day 2- Buying things from the stores on this day 3- Storekeepers who are not celebrating it selling things that may be given as gifts to people who are celebrating it? They replied: The clear evidence of the Qur’aan and Sunnah – and the consensus of the early generations of this ummah – indicates that there are only two festivals in Islam: Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. Any other festivals that have to do with a person, a group, an event or anything else are innovated festivals, which it is not permissible for Muslims to observe, approve of or express joy on those occasions, or to help others to celebrate them in any way, because that is transgressing the sacred limits of Allaah, and whoever transgresses the sacred limits of Allaah has wronged himself. If the fabricated festival is also a festival of the kuffaar, then the sin is even greater, because this is imitating them and it is a kind of taking them as close friends, and Allaah has forbidden the believers to imitate them and take them as close friends in His Holy Book. And it is proven that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.” Valentine’s Day comes under this heading because it is an idolatrous Christian festival, so it is not permissible for a Muslim who believes in Allaah and the Last Day to observe it or approve of it or congratulate people on it. Rather he has to ignore it and avoid it, in obedience to Allaah and His Messenger, and so as to keep away from the causes that incur the wrath and punishment of Allaah. It is also haraam for the Muslim to help people to celebrate this or any other haraam festival by supplying any kind of food or drink, or buying or selling or manufacturing or giving or advertising etc., because all of that is cooperating in sin and transgression and is disobedience towards Allaah and His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Help you one another in Al‑Birr and At‑Taqwa (virtue, righteousness and piety); but do not help one another in sin and transgression. And fear Allaah. Verily, Allaah is Severe in punishment” [al-Maa’idah 5:2] The Muslim must adhere to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah in all his affairs, especially at times of fitnah when evil is widespread. He should be smart and avoid falling into the misguidance of those who have earned Allaah’s anger and who have gone astray, and the evildoers who have no fear of Allaah and who do not have any pride in being Muslims. The Muslim must turn to Allaah and seek His guidance and remain steadfast in following it, for there is no Guide except Allaah and no one can make a person steadfast but Him. And Allaah is the source of strength. May Allaah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions. End quote. 3 – Shaykh Ibn Jibreen (may Allaah preserve him) was asked: Among our young men and women it has become common to celebrate Valentine’s Day, which is named after a saint who is venerated by the Christians, who celebrate it every year on February 14, when they exchange gifts and red roses, and they wear red clothes. What is the ruling on celebrating this day and exchanging gifts? He replied: Firstly: it is not permissible to celebrate these innovated festivals, because it is an innovation for which there is no basis in Islam. It comes under the heading of the hadeeth of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allaah be pleased with her), according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever introduces anything into this matter of ours that is not part of it will have it rejected.” Secondly: it involves imitating the kuffaar and copying them by venerating that which they venerate and respecting their festivals and rituals, and imitating them in something that is part of their religion. In the hadeeth it says: “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.” Thirdly: it results in evils and haraam things such as wasting time, singing, music, extravagance, unveiling, wanton display, men mixing with women, women appearing before men other than their mahrams, and other haraam things, or things that are a means that leads to immorality. That cannot be excused by the claim that this is a kind of entertainment and fun. The one who is sincere towards himself should keep away from sin and the means that lead to it. And he said: Based on this, it is not permissible to sell these gifts and roses, if it is known that the purchaser celebrates these festivals or will give these things as gifts on those days, so that the seller will not be a partner of the one who does those innovations. And Allaah knows best. End quote. And Allaah knows best. https://islamqa.info/en/73007 |
So painful |
hotwax:I pray God show you His way |
Let every Muslims stay away from it |
Canadian Mathematician Tried To Prove Quran False, Ended Up Accepting Islam https://www.nairaland.com/4312139/canadian-mathematician-tried-prove-quran |
Gary Miller was a professor of Mathematics at the University of Toronto. He also was a Christian missionary who noticed that Muslim people were almost impossible to convert to Christianity. In 1977 he decided to study the Quran with the goal of finding scientific and historical errors that would help in convincing Muslims they are following a false religion. The first thing professor Miller noticed was that many verses of the Quran challenge people to use reason: "Will they not then contemplate the Quran? and if it had been from other than God, indeed they would have found in it many contradictions." (Quran 4:82) "... and in case you are suspicious about what we have been sending down upon our bondman, (i.e. prophet Muhammad) then come up with a surah of like, and invoke your witnesses, apart from God, in case you are sincere." (Quran 2:23) After careful study professor Miller was amazed by the Quran and reached the conclusion that it cannot be the work of a human being. He accepted Islam and started calling people to the straight path through lectures and other activities. His lecture "the Amazing Quran" shows the deep knowledge he acquired during his study of the book of Allah. Here are some of the points he makes in the lecture: "There is no such author who writes a book and then challenges others that this book is errorless. As for the Quran, it is the other way around. It tells the reader that there are no errors in it and then challenges all people to find any, if any. The Quran is not Prophet Muhammad's autobiography as many non muslims claim. It does not mention the hard events in Prophet Muhammad's personal life, such as the death of his wife Khadijah, or the death of his daughters and sons. Strangely enough, the verses that were revealed during a time of defeat for the Muslims proclaimed victory while those revealed at time of victory warned against arrogance and called for more sacrifices and efforts. If one writes his own autobiography, he would magnify the victories and justify the defeats. The Quran did the opposite and this is consistent and logical: it was not a history of a specific period but rather a text that sets general rules for the relationship between God almighty and the people. https://www.allamericanmuslim.com/gary-miller/ |
Responding To The Greetings Of A Parrot Or Phone Ringing? https://www.nairaland.com/4312119/responding-greetings-parrot-phone-ringing#64522714 |
Praise be to Allah. Firstly: Al-Fayyoomi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The babgha (parrot) is a well-known bird. The word babgha may be masculine or feminine, and the plural is Babghawat. Al-Misbah al-Muneer fi Ghareeb al-Sharh al-Kabeer, 1/35 Secondly: It seems that it is not prescribed to return the greeting of a parrot which has learnt how to say salams (Islamic greeting), because saying salam is an act of worship and a supplication which requires intention on the part of the one who said it, and there is no such intention on the part of this trained creature. So one should not return its greeting. The ruling is the same as that on a tape on which the greeting is recorded and can be heard. It is a transmission of sound and does not come under the ruling on greeting when it is broadcast live, in which case returning the greeting is prescribed and is a communal obligation (fard kifayah). Al-Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Sometimes the greeting may be recorded and they put it on the tape and run it. If it is recorded then you are not obliged to return the greeting, because this is just a transmission of sound. Liqa’ al-Bab al-Maftooh, 28/229 See the rest of the fatwa and details on this issue in the answer to question number 128737. Based on this, the parrot does not intend to give the greeting of salam, because it does not possess the power of reason, and when it speaks it is just repeating what it has been taught, without meaning what it says. Some of the scholars have stated that it is not prescribed to prostrate if one hears a verse from a parrot or from a recorded tape. One of the conclusions of the book Bahjat al-Asma‘ fi Ahkam al-Sama‘ fi’l-Fiqh al-Islami by Prof. ‘Ali ibn Dhariyan ibn Faris al-Hasan al-‘Anzi (published by Dar al-Manar in Kuwait) is: The listener need not do the prostration of recitation if he hears it from a source that is not human, such as a trained bird like a parrot or hearing it from an echo. End quote. And Allah knows best. https://islamqa.info/en/140497 |
If a person dies in the bathroom, is that indicative of a bad end? https://www.nairaland.com/4312094/person-dies-bathroom-indicative-bad |
Question: What is the verdict on one who dies in the bathroom whilst he is fasting in the month of Ramadan? Praise be to Allah. In such cases, if a person dies in such circumstances, it has nothing to do with being praiseworthy or blameworthy in and of itself, and there is no Islamic ruling connected to that. Islamic rulings only have to do with the deeds of those who are accountable. If a person dies in a particular place, or at a particular time, or in a particular posture, that is not part of his deeds and it is not within his control, so there is no ruling that is connected to it. With regard to the death of one who is fasting, this is the matter concerning which there are reports which point to its virtue, not because death in this situation was within his control, but because he died whilst doing a righteous deed and his life ended with that. It is the righteous deed that is within his control and is connected to the ruling of Allah. If a person dies doing such a deed, that is a blessing granted by Allah, may He be exalted, to His slave, and it is encouraged to constantly do such deeds, in the hope that one might die doing such a thing. It was narrated that Hudhayfah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever fasts one day, seeking the Countenance of Allah, and his life ends with that, will enter Paradise.” Narrated by Ahmad (no. 22235). Shaykh al-Arna’oot said: It is saheeh because of corroborating evidence. It was also narrated by al-Bazzaar in his Musnad (1/436) as follows: “If a person’s life ends with a day of fasting, he will enter Paradise.” Classed as saheeh by Shaykh al-Albaani. Al-Mannaawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The words “If a person’s life ends with a day of fasting” mean: if a person’s life concludes with a day of fasting, in the sense that he dies when he is fasting or after breaking his fast. The words “will enter Paradise” mean: with those who enter it first, or without prior punishment. End quote from Fayd al-Qadeer Sharh al-Jaami‘ as-Sagheer (6/160) Muslim narrated in his Saheeh (5126) that Jaabir said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) say: “Each person will be resurrected in the condition in which he died.” Ibn al-Jawzi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: If a person dies in a particular condition, then his life ends with that, and in that condition he will be resurrected. End quote from Kashf al-Mushkil min Hadeeth as-Saheehayn (1/751) And Allah knows best. https://islamqa.info/en/174416 |
Mynd44:Just stop saying what you of no knowledge of my friend |
Mynd44:You are shooting your self on the leg bro, if you respect others too truly, you won't post what u posted before Lukgaf:Any respect here. FYI Islam is the religion from our creator not people views religiom |
Mynd44:Let's listen and stop what you have no knowledge of, a devout Muslim must respect Shari'ah as those who reject it are like you people in categorisation |
aonag:What class are you sir/ma? Talk like a graduate now. Is everything islamization? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 98 pages)