₦airaland Forum

I am about crying. This country. Ehn

u want theif

Injustice. He steals pass Saraki?

As inevitable as death. If our leaders can be attending the wake keep of people like that. They will reason there own is one day and thereby discharge their duties and stop embezzling. Saraki look at your friend, how many billion naira was put in his grave? Any amount stolen is for your children to share after you have gone.

And where is even lalasticlala self. Is he asleep? WAEC std must be rest assured na

The West African Examinations Council (WAEC) has bowed to pressure, and is ready to amend the part of its 2018 SSCE Examination that clashed with the Friday Jumah prayer.

The affected subject is Chemistry 1 and 2, which was originally slated for 2pm to 5pm on Friday, April 20, 2018.


Following reactions from Muslim organisations, the Director of Public Affairs, WAEC Nigeria, Mr Demianus Ojijeogu has confirmed the slight amendment to Premium Times.

Mr Ojijeogu said: “For the sake of the people who will go to the mosque, the exam will be delayed till they come back”.

According to him, “the paper will be delayed till 2:30 pm or 3 pm, when the Muslims will return from the mosque.”

Prof Ishaq Akintola, Prof Abdulrazaq Kilani, Dr Saheed Ashafa and Hajia (Barrister) Mutiat Toyosi Orolu spoke with Premium Times, which exclusively investigated and reported the story.

http://www.iwitness.com.ng/waec-bows-to-pressure-adjusts-timetable-to-enable-muslims-observe-jumaat/

Cc:

Sissie & Mukina2

LaudableXX:
You are the one that has refused to understand the simple facts! Lawyers have been wearing the wig and gown as the approved outfit for court appearances, since this country became independent, and since law school started in 1962. The only approved, prescribed uniform for lawyers appearing in court, is the wig and gown - NOT wig and hijab! Many female muslim lawyers understand this part, and they comply with the legal requirements of the profession. They have been doing so, since this country called Nigeria was created.

Any Muslim female who feels she is incomplete without a hijab, should NOT study law, because the hijab is not approved for the use of female muslim lawyers within the court, here. Instead, such a woman can study teaching, nursing or any other course that permits the use of a hijab. It sounds crude, but that is the only way to get the message across to people like you. It is not by force to study law!

Now, since I believe you went to school, this fact must be simple enough for you to understand. But if you still want to argue without understanding the facts, like you have been doing, please ask God to give you wisdom so that you can stop sounding clueless!

I can see they have brain washed u sir. Can't you think logically? Which one superceeds? Human right or law school?

happney65:
Muslims are real weere people..They will be doing as if they own the world..Members of the seventh day adventist should also go on a protest and tell the Federal govt not to fix elections on Saturday or else they will go and tear ballot papers..or when there are environmental days on Saturday they should protest and destroy everywhere..

These people no get any sense at all..They will keep on disturbing the peace of the whole world

What you are saying is not?

bigdot1759:
u have no knowledge of what we call ablution, before u are eligible to do any salat u have to be clean, so how would u make ablution WITHOUT washing where u must wash hand is first thing to wash so how would u wash it WITHOUT all dirt in & out?

I hope you understand what I write. You can kindly go through again

LaudableXX:
You were the one that started the abuses first. Check your previous post. I merely replied you in the same coin. There is NO injustice in this case. Hijab was NEVER part of the approved outfit for lawyers in the first place, since 1962 when law school started in Nigeria. Go and check.

The injustice is from those people who now want to force an item of dressing (i.e hijab) that was never there in the first place, into the whole uniform. After signing different forms that they would abide by the rules of the law school, and the dictates of the legal profession, they now turn round to break it by demanding for a hijab, which was never part of the uniform of the lawyers, from inception - they are the real hypocrites!

If truly you have sense, you would see that clearly, except you have been blinded by hypocrisy! #Dont be a hypocrite and a dunce

But dont you understand my explanation since. The basis is the country combines Muslims, christian and other religion. Muslims have the one they go out before even before Law school started. should they inconvienient themselves or face the wrath of their creator because they want to go to school? until you guys understand Hijab is part of our sisters' dressing, Muslim sisters without hijab is like a body without head. We are not competing religion as for the Hijab wearing as many think. but they are not complete as human being without the hijab. pls try and understand that and the fact they dont force you people to cover your head or not wearing on your head should not cause any problem at all my friend. Let us tolerate one another pls! we own this country together. To reiterate, Our Hijab is like head on the body, without it, they are not completed. Thanks

Many of the untrained nurses even shout at patience. Since nobody taught them psychology. Nigeria gba Ole ati Eru. You even see a chemist in front of your treating people and prescribing drugs. Haba! They have killed many people with thier ignorance

I support consistuted authority for this, FG should place ban on them too and provide portable health services. It is only in Nigeria you see a secondary school holder that practices nursing. Many lives have been claimed by them

Oyo State government has warned that it will continue to seal private hospitals that employ or train any auxiliary nurse in their health facilities as part of its efforts to reduce quackery in the state.

Commissioner for Health, Dr Azeez Adeduntan made the disclosure after Oyo State Taskforce on Private Medical Practice sealed eight private health facilities in Ibadan and reassessed others for reopening.

At Apete, a suburb of Ibadan, the task force met a graduation ceremony for nurses ongoing at one hospital, while another had slated a graduation ceremony for its nine trainees.

Also, another hospital being run by an unregistered nurse, that was initially closed in 2008, but practicing under another name in Orogun, was also sealed.

Offences of the sealed hospitals range from non-registration of the premises, unhygienic hospital environment, improper disposal of medical wastes and failure to have qualified medical staff on ground.

Dr Adeduntan, speaking through Chairman, Oyo State Taskforce on Private Medical Practice, Dr Adebisi Ayoola, said only those that trained at accredited and approved training institutions are expected to be working in these facilities.

He declared: “there is no room for the training of the so-called auxiliary nurses; anybody that is interested in the profession should attend established and government accredited medical and nursing schools.

“In Oyo State alone, there are 12 institutions where they can be trained as nurses. Often, those we called auxiliary nurses are mostly people who do meet the criteria to attend such schools. Auxiliary nurses are quacks, as far as Oyo State government is concerned.”

Dr Adeduntan, however, warned private hospitals and medical laboratories with their annexes that only registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission to also get them registered appropriately by Oyo State government.

According to him, all facilities found culpable for any offence that regulates private health facility practice stand to face a penalty of N100, 000 or one-year imprisonment.

The exercise, which he said was a continuous one, he declared, was not targeting anybody or vindictive but corrective, urging people who need information on criteria for registration on any health facility, including medical laboratories to freely come to the ministry.

Credit: Nigerian Tribune

http://insideoyo.com/oyo-govt-goes-private-hospital-training-auxiliary-nurses/

Cc:
Lalasticlala
Mynd44

LaudableXX:
Your brain needs to be rebooted. After all the explanations given, you cannot see that your Firdaus was just being a drama queen, who decided to display her stuvpidity. She had more than 5 years to file a case in court, seeking approval to wear the hijab as part of her lawyer's robes, to court. She did not do so, but decided to wait until the day of the call to bar to throw a tantrum. Her name has now become synonymous with illogicality. She had ample time to raise a petition before the date of the call to bar, requesting the Council for Legal Education to change the rules in her favour. She did not do so. Can you see how immature she is?

In several countries where there is a dress code for court appearances by lawyers, did not suddenly change overnight to admit hijab wearing female lawyers. Many of those female muslim lawyers in such countries filed a case in court, seeking approval or permission to wear the hijab, as part of their wig and gown, before they were granted the chance to do so. In the USA, they do not have a prescribed uniform or robe, for lawyers, so most lawyers wear what they like, as long as it conforms to the notion of formal wear. That is why, there hasn't been much fuss over female muslim lawyers wearing the hijab. Educate yourself and stop recycling crap like a parrot.

As a sign of maturity, I won't abuse you like you have done but if truly you have sense as u claimed you will see there is injustice on the part of Muslims sister banning Hijab wearing to the call to bar in the first instance. Do they believe only Christian will practice law? But your hatred will not let you see it was wrong. #dont be hypocrites

What of if we have bokoharam members on nairaland. You want them to track you?

if we dont protest, our govt will not do wat they sud do

Tolyna04:
Hijab isn't allowed in the law school. That is sacrosanct. Nothing can change it. No accommodation for religious zealots in the law profession in this country. It is not their right to dress anyhow anywhere the Nigerian constitution expressly forbids state religion. She's wasting time. She should take her matter to court.

Like I said the hatred you guys have Islam will not help you see that it is part of our right to practise any religion.. Pls diversify Ur thinking Sir and make religion apart

Cooly100:
Why in this world would you guys like to claim superior to others?

A Saudi person will like to visit London or Germany all wrapped up...They will also like the person from London or Germany visiting them in Saudi to be wrapped up like them...

Can you see the point? Why not also allow others to have the same attitude as you.

Do you see any tolerance with you guys?

The problem is that you guys didn't understand is hijab is part of our dressings. We mean no harm. Our sisters are not completed without this hijab

LaudableXX:
When people like you who are supposed to be educated, come online to say such dirty things it makes me wonder if you truly acquired that education, or you bought your certificate. You are the one saying smelling things that needs to talk to your own brain.

When did law school start in Nigeria? 1962. Since that 1962 till date, do you want to tell me that muslim women have not passed through the Nigerian law school? Do you know how many female muslim lawyers and judges exist in Nigeria? The former Chief Justice of Nigeria was a Muslim woman - Mariam Aloma Mukhtar was Nigeria's first female Chief Justice in 2012. Did you ever see her wearing a hijab under her wig and gown, in the law court?

Anybody that decides to study law, already knows what the uniform for lawyers looks like. So if you do not see lawyers wearing hijab, and you know it is not allowed, why not study another profession like teaching where it is allowed, if it is so important for you to wear your hijab?

Stop saying dirty things and go back to school to get an education, instead of insulting people who do not share your views. Only daft people like you do so, because they lack intelligence. In the legal profession, hijab is NOT allowed to be worn as a part of the approved outfit for lawyers, in court. Deal with it! Let Firdaus go and practice law in a Sharia court, if she wants to wear hijab!

I can now see something is wrong with you sir. If you speak to your brain if truly you are educated and mature like you proclaim you will see and understand that Nigeria is not the only country practising law, why is Hijab allowed in other country Law school even with less Muslim population. But the hatred you have on Islam will not allow you to say the truth. Are they not Nigerian? Is it not thier right to wear what they like or do any profession they like with their way of religion. I am so disappointed in you and some others who because of Islam hatred can not say the truth.

Fourthly:

Determining what materials prevent water from reaching the skin is dependent on the nature of these materials. The scholars studied this matter, and reached the conclusion that materials are of two types:

The first type is material that has substance, i.e., it remains as a layer (on the skin), so when it is placed on the body it remains cohesive, separate from the skin, and can be removed by peeling or wiping it off.

The second type is material that has no substance, i.e., it does not form a layer, and as soon as it lands or is placed on the body, it loses its cohesiveness and it breaks down and is absorbed by the skin, and there is nothing left of it; rather only traces of it remain, such as colour and the like.

See the answer to question no. 240518.

Based on that, it may be said:

If the dirt has substance in the sense that it forms a layer on the skin to the extent that it prevents water from reaching the skin, then it must be removed when doing wudoo’.

If it is simply a matter of colour, or it had substance but it is very little and can be removed with water, then it does not make wudoo’ invalid.

And Allah knows best.

https://islamqa.info/en/265777

Thirdly:

With regard to the hadith mentioned in the question, there is a difference of opinion concerning it.

Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Regarding the hadith of Anas, it was narrated by Abu Dawood, but its isnad includes al-Waleed ibn Zarwaan, whose status is unknown….

It also has other isnaads from Anas, but they are da‘eef (weak).

End quote from at-Talkhees al-Habeer (1/86).

It was classed as saheeh by Ibn al-Qayyim in Tahdheeb as-Sunan, and by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.

Assuming that it is saheeh, the command mentioned in the hadith may be understood as meaning that it is mustahabb, so as to reconcile between this and other reports, because the majority of those who narrated reports about the Prophet’s wudoo’ did not mention running the fingers through the beard (to make the water reach the skin); if it were obligatory, he would not have omitted it from his wudoo’ (and would have done it every single time), and if he had done it in every wudoo’, then those who narrated descriptions of his wudoo’ would have mentioned it, and they would have made sure to describe how he did it in a clear way, or most of them would have done that.

Secondly:

What is enjoined in the Book of Allah is to wash the face. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O you who believe! When you intend to offer As-Salat (the prayer), wash your faces…”

[al-Maa’idah 5:6].

With regard to the area under the chin, it is not included in the definition of the face, so it does not have to be washed.

Al-Kaasaani said: Because the face is what is seen when looking at a person; whatever is not seen is not part of the face.

End quote from Badaa’i‘ as-Sanaa’i‘ (1/3).

Praise be to Allah

Firstly:

You do not have to use something to lift the nail so that the water can pass beneath it; rather that is a kind of strictness that is not acceptable according to Islamic teachings. If the person who is doing wudoo’ washes the parts of his body in an ordinary manner, then he has obeyed the command of Allah, may He be exalted, and has done what is required of him.

If it so happens that there is a small amount of anything under the nail that the water does not reach, then it comes under the heading of negligible matters that are pardoned, such as dirt under the nails and cracks in the feet; the one who is doing wudoo’ does not have to make sure that water enters every single crack or to check them and examine them.

It says in Mataalib Ooli an-Nuha (1/116): A small amount of dirt under the nails and the like does not matter, and the same applies to the inside of the nose, even if it prevents water reaching where it should, because these are things that usually happen a great deal, and if wudoo’ were not valid in the case of such matters, then the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would have explained it, because it was not permissible for him to delay explaining at the time when such knowledge was needed.

To that – i.e., the issue of a small amount of dirt – Shaykh Taqiy ad-Deen ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) added every small thing that could prevent water reaching the skin, such as dried blood or dough on any part of the body. This was the view he favoured by analogy with dirt under the nails.

That also includes cracks that may appear on some parts of the body. End quote.

Question:

I have a few questions regarding wudu. what is meant by when washing the face it needs to be done from "ear to ear" does it mean where the top of the ear connects to the head going towords the face so includein some of the side burns? please clarify also when wipeing the ear does the entire ear have to be wiped front to back becuase the ear and on my foot toe nail of the nail is average big and if firmly on the skin should i live the nail with a thin object to allow water through without pain? Also is washing undet chin needed? Is this hadeeth strong?- Anas (RA) narrates that the Prophet (SAW), when he made wudu, used to take a handful of water and enter it below his chin and rub it through his beard and said, "This is what my Lord - the Great and Exalted - has ordered me to do." (Sahih - Abu Dawood, Al-Baihaqee, Al-Haakim) And finnnaly how does one tell of the dirt on his hand or something will prevent water. would be nice if all questions can get clear answer please so i can move away from doubts during wudu (Ablution)

Islam is beauty.

Answer:


All praise is due to Allaah. May peace and blessings be on the Messenger of Allaah, his household and companions.

One day, Shaykh Al-Albaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) phoned me while I was away.

So my little daughter picked the call and said: "Assalaam alaykum warahmatullaah"

Shaykh asked after me from her and said to her, "(when your dad returns) inform him that Muhammad Naasirud-deen Al-Albaani asked called. (He didn't add 'Shaykh' to his name. And this is part of his humility. May Allaah elevate his position in Jannah, Ameen).

Upon my return, my daughter informed me that a man named Muhammad Naasirud-deen Al-Albaani had called.


Immediately, I phoned him and, after he had discussed his matter with me.

He said: O Aboo Islaam! When I called your number earlier, your daughter answered it and initiated the salaam. Is this something proven from knowledge or just a personal action from a minor? Benefit us O Aboo Islaam! (this also is part of his humility and wisdom in Da'wah. May Allaah have mercy on him).

I replied, this is something from a minor and (this is happening for the first time). What we know concerning this matter is that the receiver should only pick his call and say, "Na'am". Then, the caller should say the salaam while he the receiver responds to it and not that he initiates the greeting.


Shaykh said: Yes, this is the correct position which is known to us. The caller via telephone is like someone knocking on the door. There's no difference between them.



May Allah forgive the shortcomings of our scholars and be with them.

Related by a student of Shaykh Al-Albaani Aboo Islaam in his book "Aqeedah first, only if they know" vol.I, pp. 16-17.

The justice that Allaah makes obligatory on us has to do with al-Maaddah, things that can be bought with money and so on. We should be just when giving them money, when providing shelter, (regarding) what they wear and so on. However, it is not possible to be just amongst them in your heart. There is no one who can be just amongst his wives in his heart. You married them because you love them, but there is no doubt that you will love a person more than the other; you may not be able to identify it, but they may be the ones reading it for you. So Allaah does not ask us to be just regarding this.

What we should be just about are things we have power upon as the Prophet would say, ‘I have done that which I am capable of, do not call me to account for that which I am unable to do’. This justice has to do with something which money can buy and with catering for the needs of all the wives regarding what they want. If there is a wife from the four wives you have who was brought up with eating yam flour (lafun), which is from the cheapest of foods, you should give her what she needs. A bag of yam flour may not be up to ten thousand naira. If there is another one who was brought up with Semovita, (you should give her what she desires even when) you know the amount you will spend to get that will be exorbitant if you wish to buy the same size of Semovita as that of yam flour. So we should buy whatever each of them cherishes; this is justice.

There are from women, those who have never slept on bed before, they were trained with sleeping on mat. If she insists that you must buy her a mat, the one made by hand weaving; you have to follow suit. If you decide to buy a costly one and she rejects it, you will be just once you buy what she wants for her. As for the one who desires bed, buy a bed for her; that is justice. If you want to buy clothes for them and one of them desires a cloth of three thousand naira while the other desires a cloth of six thousand naira, if you buy what each of them wants, you have applied justice. The price is not a problem, because the most important thing is to give each wife whatever she requests. This is what is referred to as equality in Islaam; this is what Allaah orders us to do.

Injustice is when you cater for the need of one wife and you neglect the need of the other wife. However, it is left to women to be patient with their husbands. Most times, they make their husbands misbehave. They frustrate their husbands by asking for needs excessively. And this makes their husbands preoccupied with their own activities alone. Women should be patient with their husbands; be patient and contented with whatever provision Allaah has given your husbands. There is no doubt that every sensible person knows that facing hardship in marriage is preferable to not having a husband to marry. This is because if you remain in your father’s house, you will regret alone by the time you’re insulted once in a while. You may consider committing suicide by the time you are mocked for not having a husband. Since Allaah have blessed you to have a husband, be patient with him. It is better for you than staying in your father’s house. Na’am.

Question answered by Dr Sharoffudeen Gbadebo Raji (Hafidhou Llah)

[SOURCE: Q&A session of the tape, “Explanation of the Harms of takfeer” at Ede]

Transcribed by Aboo Aaishah Al Odeomeey

LaudableXX:
Was she not practising the religion before she applied to study law, and was informed from day one while she was still in school, that hijab is not allowed as part of the wig and gown in Nigeria?

Honestly u are saying what is smelling sir. But you are graduate now. Y sud Hijab be banned in a law school in the first instance when it is right of some citizens. Pls let us talk to our brain now, is it only Nigeria practising law? And will Hijab makes her not to be a good lawyer. Because I don't understand this country walai. You tell soldiers to safe their beard when you know some religions will prefer to leave it whereas it is not like that the beard will not allow them to shoot. Why won't just for once say truth even if it is bitter bro