₦airaland Forum

Ihedinobi: hehehehehehehehehe....... What, you don't like my fatherliness? Lol

Uyi Iredia: There you have it ! A clear reason why MacDaddy trolls Nairaland. He is jobless.

seriallink: Still persecuting Yahweh huh?

Ihedinobi: I think that it is no insult to call a person who acts like it a fool.

Where is the citation that proves that biologists overwhelmingly support evolution? Where also is the argument for the idea backed by the majority being the right one?

davidylan: and you took this poll were? Most of the biologists [b]i went to school with [/b]were largely catholic and took their religion much more seriously than i did. Again vapid mules shold not be making claims they dont understand.

SimonAndal: On a more serious note, Mac, .... I dunno what to say, so I'm gonna be the troll everybody loves to hate. See, I found God, on the corner of First and Amistad.

musKeeto: hmmmm...

<in low voice> we could pretend to be men of God.. buzugee will handle deliverance and miracles, jesoul offerings, of course we wont preach tithes, no need for JoAgbaje, non tithing should mark us out, we'll just focus more on the importance of giving... secretly, we'll send the money to any atheists of our choice to invest in something more worthwhile ...

church name would be ... hmmm.. give me a sec..

davidylan: which is it? the bible is real and its words taken seriously or merely to be used as a hypocritical stick to beat christians with? Make up your mind you despicable weasel.
IF the bible is a book of fairy tales then why are you worried about my "fruits"?

lol as for not being a "knowledgeable scientist"... abeg let me rush off to take a shower, my job has to be attended to. I would hate to work jobs that let these empty heads so much time to rant at a "god" they claim is nothing but a sky pixie.

Ihedinobi: Silly questions really, seeing as you think that evolution is a science and therefore a biologist cannot reject it. Is it really? And why should we believe it is?

Second question is all the more silly because it assumes that certain pronouncements are insolent and abusive. But then, is it possible to insult a mad man by calling him crazy? Or to abuse a fool by telling him that his reasoning is empty? What you think?

Ihedinobi: How do you know what a fake christian is? Or what a fake scientist is? What is the mark of genuineness for either? Do you know?

frosbel: Surely you are not this 'thick' , right ?

Deep Sight: Hate is such a strong word. To be honest I actually like you: you're funny and entertaining and energetic, but sadly you are not yet rigorous in thought or logic. Please read and comment (line by line) on Prizm's.

Because it is lazy comebacks;s like this one that convince me that you guys have not even bothered to think deeply about the issues you wish to debate.

How can you then be taken seriously?

Also think of the “Equator” or “the center of gravity of the solar system”. The equator has an attribute like a certain length; one can cross the equator but the equator is clearly NOT a physical object even though it exists in time and space. The same goes for the center of gravity of the solar system which is a point moving about in space. It is not a physical/material object either. It is an abstract spatiotemporal object for theoretically the center of gravity of the solar system is a moving point in space that you can momentarily enclose in a tiny container before it passes right through the container as it moves about.

Deep Sight: It is very nauseating that nobody will read or comment on Prizm's profound write-up, but tomorrow, on another thread we will see them arrogantly jumping up and down with silly phrases like "epic fail" and "argument from ignorance". . . . . . I dey laff.

Deep Sight: It is very nauseating that nobody will read or comment on Prizm's profound write-up, but tomorrow, on another thread we will see them arrogantly jumping up and down with silly phrases like "epic fail" and "argument from ignorance". . . . . . I dey laff.

let me show you why your logic fails.

Premise 1: An omniscient being is one that knows everything
Premise 2: An omniscient being cannot know X (rather no being can know X)
Conclusion: Therefore an omniscient being cannot exist.

(it doesn't matter what X is because the moment you define something as all-knowing, you immediately cannot make exceptions for it)

Delafruita: religionists,especially christians havee a hypocritical notion about wealth and riches.they claim the riches of these world should be forgone for the riches of heaven.however,the same people will readily take a scrappy job that pays peanuts.others would start a business and give a gazillion % of it to their churches as tithes,offerings,first fruits, etc.me loves money because money gives you the power to give meaning to your life

SimonAndal: Are you bumping your own thread? Lol

MacDaddy01: [size=18pt]No one listens to a poor man. Get that swag, atheists. No one can argue against a good behaviour and a range rover.
[/size]




Sermon is over, please donate to the logicalist church of atheism, yourt tithe will be used towards a range rover and then a private jet!

cyrexx: @ Macdaddy,


let me sing a song for you from Rihanna's "(Cheers) Drink To That" and make it a toast as we pop this e-champagne together.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR0v0i63PQ4


and here is the lyrics



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nVI0ovKg8A

musKeeto: A rule is there to protect one from danger or hurt.
Note, you can work on any other day. But on a particular day, drop your tools.

What is the danger in working on the Sabbath?

Note: Like you said, predictability is trustworthiness, that's why I picked a command that is at best flimsy. I could anticipated your response :-)

Ps: keep in mind Jesus' response to a similar question in the NT.

jayriginal: I havent heard that word in ages.

Did you grow in the midwest?