₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,778 members, 8,513,640 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 10:22 AM

Toggle theme

Malvisguy212's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Malvisguy212's Profile › Malvisguy212's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 (of 366 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 8:41pm On Apr 06, 2015
Misogynist2014:
Why then did Jesus die? Are you telling me you're righteous!?( 2 The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any
that did understand, and seek God.
3 They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth
good, no, not one.) Salvation is by faith..... For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Jesus died ,ressurected and live forever, if I believe in Him, His righteousness will dwell in me and I will be righteous, why won't I say I am righteous? God has already work salvation for me through Jesus, and I believe, what does it mean?
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 8:36pm On Apr 06, 2015
The knowledge of the law help us to understand sins, without the law we wouldn't have know this;

Galatian 5:19-21
19 The acts of the flesh are obvious:
sexual immorality, impurity and
debauchery; 20 idolatry and witchcraft;
hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage,
selfish ambition, dissensions, factions 21
and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the
like. I warn you, as I did before, that
those who live like this will not inherit
the kingdom of God.

the purpose of the law is to revealed sin, however we are led by the spirit and if we believe in Jesus we will be called the sons of God and the fruit of the spirit will indwell in us;

Galatian 5:22-25
22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy,
peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness,
faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-
control. Against such things there is no
law. 24 Those who belong to Christ Jesus
have crucified the flesh with its passions
and desires. 25 Since we live by the
Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit.
26 Let us not become conceited,
provoking and envying each other.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 7:57pm On Apr 06, 2015
Goshen360:
When you study every context of Christ ministry, you will see some contradicting statement. At a point, Christ said, don't go to the gentiles. At another point, he said go to all. It was also written, he came to save HIS OWN people. Another said, to save the whole world. At some point, he gives harder laws and at some point, he violates things written in the law. That tells me, it is not what the law says to do but what was written about him in the law that he came to fulfil.

Paul the Apostle by revelation said, Christ came to redeem THOSE under the law. First, who are those people? You and me? Certainly not. 2. If he was redeeming them from under the law, is he putting them back under the law from which he redeemed them?

So, to your questions. Christ operated under the FLESH that is, atmosphere of the law to bury people in the law and he operated under the SPIRIT, that's atmosphere of Grace and truth to show the glimpse of the new covenant. These things you will read in the epistles.
first gentile is used to described outsiders,the gentile are referee as enemy of the Jews the gentile are not country people ,in Mark 7:26, Jesus helps a Gentile woman who had asked for her daughter’s freedom from a demon.when Jesus indicating "don't go to the gentile" you have to understand the context and asked, who are the gentile in this context? There is a reprobate nation , a nation which God has already judge but God waited until they filled up there measures, example is the amalikites, God judge them in exedus but God waited for more than 300 years after they filled up there measures, David Wipe them out.they are good example of the reprobate nation also read isaiah 6.

But when christ say go to the gentile, also you need to understand the context, the gentile may be reffering to the Romans or Greek and christ is telling the disciples to preach to them ,there is no contradiction in the word of Jesus.When writing to the (mostly Gentile) church in Rome, Paul communicated his goal: “For I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile” (Romans 1:16). Paul realized that the coming of Jesus provided the opportunity for salvation to whoever would believe in Christ’s name ( John 3:16).
Let me ask you this, to you,what do you gain from the law? Do you think you will know lust without the law? Some nation whom the gospel has not been preach to , how will you preach to them without them understanding the law of God?
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 6:18pm On Apr 06, 2015
Goshen360:
cheesy cheesy cheesy

My brother, I have studied Romans 7 and the whole of Romans as a whole. If any preacher\teacher of the word hasn't study Roman which is the entry point to the new covenant, such person is yet to begin.

I have never said, Grace means one is lawless. The laws we keep is in obedience to the law of the Spirit, not the Mosaic. This law of the Spirit, you as a Christ knows it is not right to steal, kill etc. But when you don't do these things, someone like you will see it as obeying the things written in the Mosaic law but no, it is not!

The people taught Paul was only talking about some aspects of the Law in Romans 7 but Paul showed that, he was talking about the whole law as one, the 10 commandments inclusive. We're free from all the law. Our obedience is the the law of faith in th Spirit of God which leads to life.

Expanded Bible (EXB)
(Those who are not Jews [Gentiles] do not have the law, but when they ·freely [by nature; instinctively] do what the law commands, they ·are the law for themselves [or reveal their awareness of God’s law]. This is true even though they do not have the law [ the written law of Moses].

King James Bible
For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:

Romans 2:14

^ The above verses says:

1. The Gentiles, that is, YOU & ME....DO NOT HAVE THE LAW. That is, the Law OF MOSES wasn't written to US
2. It says, WE DO THINGS contained in the law. How? By our nature.....I would call this OUR NEW NATURE in Christ
3. This does not equal obeying the law of Moses even though we see ourselves carrying out what's written in the law of Moses. We are only carrying out BY NATURE of our new man, things contained in the law. So, the Spirit of God in you doesn't tell you to steal, kill, murder etc.
among your conclusion,this confused me;
1. The Gentiles, that is, YOU & ME....DO
NOT HAVE THE LAW. That is, the Law OF
MOSES wasn't written to US.

Jesus quote the law of Moses and claimed to fullfiled this law, now if the law of Moses wasn't written to us as you said, doesent this mean christ wasn't sent to All nation? But to the Jews? Remember,in acts1:6-8 Jesus command his disciples to preach to All nation.

The second paragraph in the op say;
"When the law was introduced, it was
never intended to be the instrument by
which man would save himself, but it
was the instrument through which man
was to be saved."
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 3:22pm On Apr 06, 2015
Goshen360:
You can never understand that verse until you dig the connection between "abolish" and "fulfill" the law. It simply means "somethings are written IN THE LAW about him and that's what he came TO FULFILL, NOT TO ABOLISH". He's not telling you to "continue" to keep the law is he had already fulfill it and it wasn't written about you and to you in the for place, it was written for you.
I like your explanation, we are all here to learn from each other.

The advantage of the law is to revealed our sinful nature(if the law do not say, you shall not kill.,I wouldn't have known that) but man still find it hard to keep the law, the question is What motivate God to meet our need(grace)? It's love;
Romans 5:8
8 But God demonstrates His own love
toward us, in that while we were yet
sinners, Christ died for us.
John15:13
13 “Greater love has no one than this,
that one lay down his life for his
friends.

Grace is an umarited favour from God, we all are sinner and cannot keep the law. The bible defined salvation as the work of God base on the belief of Jesus christ, if we believe in Jesus christ. We will not sin or break the law .we are not under the law of sin and death.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 3:02pm On Apr 06, 2015
truthman2012:
Good writeup bro.

The Law is good because it was given by God but Grace is better as it gives God's children the ability to live by God's laws.

Law was never cancelled but fulfilled by Christ. Under the dispensation of the law, it was on paper. People read or memorize them to observe them. People knew them but could not fulfil them wholly because a break of one of them make a person a sinner. Under the law, forgiveness is not obtainable as break of any one attracts punishment. This is the reason Apostle Paul said ''by practice of the law shall no flesh be justified (Romans 3:20). You cannot be perfect by practicing the law. Anyone who commits fornication/adultery at that time would be stoned to death without forgiveness.It is almost like what exists in the world justice system today. A break of any law is not subject to forgiveness because punishment is always attached to the break. I have not seen a court judge discharging a person who has been proven to break the law.

Then, are we not to observe the laws because Christ had fulfilled them for us and we are now under Grace? Does it mean we can now lie, commit fornication and do anything that pleases us? The answer is no.
''But if, while we seek to be
justified by Christ, we
ourselves also are found
sinners, is therefore Christ
the minister of sin? God
forbid'' (Galatians 2:17).

While the law is on paper in the OT, it is in our heart in the NT, made easy to be fulfilled by the Holy Spirit.
And when he is come, he will
reprove the world of sin, and
of righteousness, and of
judgment (John 16:cool.

It is for the fulfilment of the Law God promised the NT in the OT:
I will give you a new
heart and put a new spirit
in you; I will remove from
you your heart of stone
and give you a heart of
flesh (Ezekiel 36:26).
''This is the covenant that I
will make with them after
those days, saith the Lord, I
will put my laws into their
hearts, and in their minds
will I write them'' (Heb. 10:16).

The new spirit and the new heart are obtainable after rebirth in Christ i.e after being born again.

Just like it was impossible to fulfil the law in the OT with the old spirit and old heart, so it is even now. Anyone that is not born again, having the new spirit and new heart cannot fulfil the Law of God.
joyful77 if you don't understand the op enough, read this post, you will understand more.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 2:26pm On Apr 06, 2015
davien:
You're basically using a circular argument here....lol grin

New testament writers are evidence of "jesus" existence as the author of Harry potter is evidence of hogwards'

And perhaps you don't know that early historians were mostly Christians for the first half of western development....
Jesus lived what He preached. His
followers preached what He lived and then wrote it down. The new testament writer where not historian,they were
common men and excepting Paul,
Luke, and possibly Matthew . But does education or
high position guarantee honesty or
accuracy? Surly only GOD himself could've inspired this men to write this gospels.

Come to think of it. Jesus’ first-century enemies published nothing to deny the
resurrection ; True, why would they?Yes,
His body was missing and there
were disturbing resurrection rumors,
but why would His enemies publish
written accounts denying an event they claimed never happened?
No physical evidence for the resurrection: True, but what physical evidence should we expect? Religious and Roman authorities never produced Jesus’ body to quell growing resurrection rumors even though they had every motivation (and the manpower) to find Jesus’ body and put an end to these But they didn’t.you guys (atheists) always claimed to be interlingent, but have you guys ever ask this questions?
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 1:57pm On Apr 06, 2015
Joyful77:
La ila ila Allah, Muhammad Rasul'Allah (SalAllahu Alaihi Wasalam)..... I'm a Muslim.

But what does it matter if I was an Atheist? The validity of your point should NOT depend on my religious affiliation.

Peace onto you too!
your post doesent sound like a muslim, is more like an atheist.

I will like you to answer the above post, what are the law in Islam?
Christianity Etc › Re: To Athiests, What Are Your Reasons For Dumping Religious Faith To Athiesm by malvisguy212: 11:15am On Apr 06, 2015
johnydon22:
its very simple.. i summed it all for you.. #When you die, You are fvcking dead.. simple.. NEXT!!!
Ready? Quote the thread.don't be afraid.
Christianity Etc › Re: To Athiests, What Are Your Reasons For Dumping Religious Faith To Athiesm by malvisguy212: 11:15am On Apr 06, 2015
Dp
Christianity Etc › Re: To Athiests, What Are Your Reasons For Dumping Religious Faith To Athiesm by malvisguy212: 10:39am On Apr 06, 2015
johnydon22:
Why should i fear death. If i am, death is not. if death is, i am not. why should i fear that which cannot exist when i do. smiley

Only you guys that believe in fairy tales and dabble in wishful thinking fear death..

Latest News #If you die, You will be fvcking dead grin
I do not create the thread for debate, I don't know if you are lying or not, I ask a very important question in the thread, (the last sentence in the thread) go and read the thread when you finished, type your answer "YES"or"NO" and you pass by.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Non-Christian Chatbox ( sticky ) by malvisguy212: 9:41am On Apr 06, 2015
musKeeto:
Phew... GMB won. Stil hard to believe. Cant wait for May 29. Till then, I wont be celebrating just yet.
https://www.nairaland.com/2239640/why-fear-death#32399073
Christianity Etc › Re: To Athiests, What Are Your Reasons For Dumping Religious Faith To Athiesm by malvisguy212: 9:39am On Apr 06, 2015
johnydon22:
First i read because i love reading, even as a religious person i read alot. to me life is not worth living without reading....Please i advice you get more books and read more ok.. Knowledge is powersmiley

Secondly i come to religious section because i love to argue. Too bad you failed to notice am also very active in science section...You haven't noticed we love making you religious people sound dumb (bcus u niggas dont read..lol) only revolve ya thinking on one primitive absurd fairy tale written by ancient jews because u worship an iron age jewish deity.

Atheist love to argue and show how absurd religions are.. So i am here for fun and moreover i also learn new things tho..

Life is beautiful when you are free and relaxed then when u are free throw in a little fun in nairaland.
its epic smiley

From other lower part of ur postz grin eeeyaaaah!!! he tortured his son, aaah thats too bad..

#WeFuckingLoveAtheism. smiley
https://www.nairaland.com/2239640/why-fear-death#32399073
Christianity Etc › Re: Question: Did Jesus Read The Bible? by malvisguy212: 9:35am On Apr 06, 2015
AllNaijaBlogger:
@ Empiree,

I see that you are using dubious techniques to argue. I asked you to summarize why or how Paul created Christianity and yet again, you copy and paste long-winded nonsense from anti-christian sites and then your "supporting muslim" brother cheers you on.


You then throw all manners of irrelevant statements to confuse and deceive. If there were many people referred to as "Jesus" does that change the fact that there was an original who was from God? Even your Islamic religion claims that there was an original who wasn't crucified.


Had you even read what you copied and pasted, you would realise that Paul expatiated on many things Jesus had already taught. Meaning that Paul was an early christian. Paul didnt create christanity, he was one of the writers who helped to codify the message of Christ.

If you have read the bible. you would have realised that Paul's teachings do not even reach up to a quarter of what churches and christians preach in their everyday lives.


I told you to summarize what Paul is about and yet you dodge and then copy-and-paste nonsense. What a shame.
don't wast your time on him, I created a thread "did Paul invent Christianity?" https://www.nairaland.com/1981918/did-paul-invent-christianity non of them where able to give a reasonable reply. The atheists and muslims were just posting trash.
Christianity Etc › Re: Islamic Allah's Messenger Claims Allah Wrote The Bible by malvisguy212: 9:26am On Apr 06, 2015
truthman2012:
Thank you bro. How are things? God bless you richly.

You see, the devil is a master deceiver. He needed to destroy the bible first to establish his own, quran. It is this same allah who said his word cannot change and that nothing can change it (Quran 6:115). Then how come he (allah) could still say men changed the bible? It shows he was not the speaker in the bible, hence men's capability to change it. If he was not the speaker in the bible, who is he?
the nature of God in the quran is like the nature of satan, the bible say "our God cannot lie" yet in the quran,we see allah changing his word replacing them with new revelation just to favour his ONLY prophet , the sad thing is that this innocent muslims do not have problems with this lying nature of Allah. May God help us. Thank you, good to see you once again.
Christianity Etc › Why Do You Fear Death? by malvisguy212(op): 9:14am On Apr 06, 2015
People who have no assurance of their
salvation fear death. I know, since I was
afraid of death before I put my faith in
Jesus Christ. If there is no God, then
death would be merely a ceasing of
existence ,with nothing to fear. However, if Christianity is true, then those who do not believe should fear death, since the fate of believers and non-believers is quite different.

WHY JUDGMENT?
The consistency of the physical laws of
the universe are reflection of God's
unchangeable and righteous nature. In
order to be consistent and righteous, God must judge every behavior that is not consistent with His. Therefore, any
ungodly behavior must be judged and
condemned by God in order for Him to
retain His righteousness. A common
myth is that God "grades on the curve"
and "as long as I behave better than
most people, He will allow me into
heaven." God's righteousness is absolute, not relative.

WHY FEAR?
All spiritual creatures ( angels, and humans) recognize that their spirits are eternal and that they will go through judgment of God, based upon their adherence to the laws of God. The Bible says that knowledge of God's existence and the eternal nature of the human spirit has been revealed to all people:
Ecclesiastes 3:11>>>>

He has made everything beautiful in
its time. He has also set eternity in
the hearts of men; yet they cannot
fathom what God has done from
beginning to end.

NO FEAR;
There are many possibilities on the existence of God. Atheists say that
God doesn't exist and that death results
in the end of individual existence. There
should be nothing to fear from death,
since your brain just shuts down. Deists
say that God exists, but doesn't have any interests in humanity. So, there is no heaven/hell and death ends it all, as in atheism. Many other religions claim
a god or gods, but none seem to be
interested in punishing human beings.Islam say if your good deed outweigh your bad deed,you will be favour,although this seems like a punishment to sinner that may lead to fear but this ease up the fear (if I can do enough).It is only Christianity that says that death brings judgment to the unrepentant. So, if you go by the odds, either death brings the cessation of existence or some kind of paradise that is open for everybody. It is irrational to fear this kind of uncertainty. So, the only kind of uncertainty that should be feared is whether or not Christianity is true.

ENDING FEAR;
If you want to relieve your fears about
death, you should try to determine if
Christianity is true or false. The
assignment is not too difficult. It isn't as
if you need to examine every religion on
the face of the earth - just one. Unlike
the other religions, which generally go
uncriticized, there are numerous
objections to Christianity, especially by
atheists. It's as if they know that
Christianity is the only religion that
seriously challenges their atheism. So,
you are going to live in fear and doubt
until you deal with the question of
whether Christianity is true or not. Visit
the atheists' websites. Visit the Christian
sites. Get informed and make a rational
decision.

CONCLUSION;
So to my atheists friends. If you fear death, yet believe that God does not exist, then you are being irrational. Then again, maybe you uncertain whether death is the end of your existence. ARE YOU READY TO DIE?
Christianity Etc › Re: Islamic Allah's Messenger Claims Allah Wrote The Bible by malvisguy212: 8:47am On Apr 06, 2015
truthman2012:
''The originals are long gone''.....

Gone to where, a book that was already in circulation?

By whose order were all the copies withrawn from circulation with no single copy remaining?

Allah must be very weak to allow men to destroy his book.
good morning sir.nice talk.
Christianity Etc › Re: Islamic Allah's Messenger Claims Allah Wrote The Bible by malvisguy212: 8:45am On Apr 06, 2015
Abuamam:
@OP. Being deliberately uncomprehending as usual, I see.

The Qur'an, in many verses in the Qur'an, refers to the 'Injeel' as the scripture given or revealed to Isa (as); or Jesus if you like.
Reference...
AlImran :48
AlMa'idah :46
AlMa'idah :110
AlHadeed :27
None of those books you hold today are those given to Isa (as). They are 4th century sectarian compilations of different sources which were written majorly by anonymous authors and attributed to disciples to mimic authenticity. Some meagre extracts of the sayings of Isa (as) are doubtless contained therein; but the falsehoods are too many to filter out. The present OT falls under the same general rule; although slightly older. It may also contain parts of those scriptures given to Musa (as), but which portions are original and which ones are the imaginations of the 'lying pens of scribes making the law a falsehood' (Jeremiah 8:8 ); is impossible to sift out today.
So in clearer terms, the present day gospel is NOT the original Injeel revealed to Isa (as), nor is the present day OT (Jewish,Catholic or Protestant), the Torah in its original form.
When you understand that, you will realize that the contradictions are not between the Qur'an and the Injeel; both revealed by Allah. They are contradictions between the Qur'an revealed by Allah and the different Bible versions written by mostly anonymous people.
where are the books given to Moses Jesus and David? (if not the bible) will Allah be so weak to protect his word? Infacte the quran is one of the bias book ever, the quran is the only book that condemned the faith of other religion.
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Jesus Die for Our Sin? Which Sin? Ifeann Should Please Come In by malvisguy212: 8:38am On Apr 06, 2015
udatso:
You just proved me right. Keep recycling
the quran and hadith say the pagan ritual muhammed retain it for the worship of Islam, and he say"it was the symbol of Allah, (the Arab pagan where the first to practice tawaf between safa and marwa) so I ask, how is the practices of pagan becomes the symbol of Allah? Non of you were been able to answer it ? Instead you guys are just writing with different type of colour like Artists full the thread with note without saying anything.
Islam › Re: The French Seek Knowledge About Islam From Islamic Books by malvisguy212: 9:27pm On Apr 05, 2015
Abuamam:
That applies to those muslims who convert to xtianity and other falsehoods. Listening to spirits and demons that appear as 'angels of light'; claiming to be God or 'Holy spirit'; and telling m'men of god' to impregnate other men's wives, worship in the nude, and use poor people's wealth to buy private jets.



The way that xtians; especially pentecostals; base their faith on signs and wonders and healings and testimonies of miracles.



I leave you to ponder on which particular faith leaders best fits this description. Hint... not those of Islam.



No faith has relied on philosophy and empty deceit as xtianity has.



By preaching 'riches and prosperity' and exploiting the laity via tithes, first fruits, thanksgiving... and so on and so forth.



We Muslims know that men will fall away from the true faith in the last days. The prophet (saw) said...

"Islam began as a stranger and will end as a stranger. Glad tidings to the strangers."
1.why not used your quranic verse to support your claimed? The op say Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world,(bible say broad is the way that lead to death, many there will go in there) meaning Islam is the broad way.

2. You are absolutely right,even me, I don't trust most of nowadays pastors.however this include all the written on the tree and baby born with quran and soo many of them.
3.Christians can be "case makers" precisely because the Christian faith is an evidential faith. When we, as Christians, argue for the truth of the Christian Worldview, we are not sharing an opinion. There either is a God, or there is not. Jesus is that God, or He is not. Salvation comes through Christ alone (as Jesus Himself maintained), or it does not.
This is not a matter of opinion, personal
preference or wishful thinking. The
Christian faith is grounded in evidence
that can be assessed and evaluated. The Christian faith is an evidential faith. https://www.nairaland.com/2148108/christian-faith-based-upon-evidence.
4.Islam began as a stranger meaning God did not recognised it,infacte God did not recognised religion.
Christianity Etc › Re: Question: Did Jesus Read The Bible? by malvisguy212: 8:52pm On Apr 05, 2015
Continue...
Bishr died because he trusted
Muhammad. Muhammad died, too. His
pain and sickness just lasted much
longer. In Sunan Abu Dawud,
Muhammad even described his pain to
Bishr's mother.
Sunan Abu Dawud 4449 Umm Bishr said
to the Prophet during the sickness of
which he died, "What do you think about
your illness, Apostle of Allah? I do not
think about the illness of my son except
the poisoned sheep of which he had
eaten with you at Khaibar." The Prophet
said, "And I do not think about my
illness except that. This is the time when
it cut off my aorta."
There's that aorta again.
At-Tabari, p. 124 The Messenger of God
said during the illness from which he
died—the mother of Bishr b. al-Bara had
come in to visit him—"Umm Bishr, at this
very moment I feel my aorta being
severed because of the food I ate with
your son at Khaybar."
Okay, Muhammad, we get the point
about the severed aorta.
According to Aisha, Muhammad was in
total agony before his death.
Sunan ibn Majah 1622 Aishah said, "I
never saw anyone suffer more pain than
the Messenger of Allah"
In the end, Muhammad couldn't even
walk on his own. His followers had to
drag him around.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2588 Aisha said,
"When the Prophet became sick and his
condition became serious, he requested
his wives to allow him to be treated in
my house, and they allowed him. He
came out leaning on two men while his
feet were dragging on the ground."
Now, since the Qur'an says that if
Muhammad were a false prophet, Allah
would sever his aorta; and Muhammad
eventually admitted that he could feel
his aorta being severed. You might think
we have a pretty good reason to reject
Muhammad and his religion, but you're
wrong. If you look more closely, you'll
see that we have at least ten good
reasons to reject Muhammad here.
First, think about Muhammad's
argument in the Qur'an. "If I'm a false
prophet Allah will cut my aorta!" People
who make silly claims like this usually
aren't prophets. "I am a prophet! If I'm
not, may God strike me with
lightning....Ah, no lightning! This proves
I'm a prophet." When someone uses that
kind of reasoning, chances are, he's a
false prophet, but that's exactly how
Muhammad argues in Surah 69.
(Video clip: "So logically..." "If she weighs
the same as a duck, she's made of
wood!"wink
Second, even though these God-will-
strike-me-down claims are usually
enough to spot a false prophet, I believe
that God sometimes makes things even
more clear and obvious for us. If
someone's running around saying, "I'm a
prophet! God didn't strike me down,"
God might ignore him, but in some
cases, God might decide to thoroughly
disgrace and humiliate him. And if any
false prophet in history was a candidate
for divine judgment, it was Muhammad.
Now, Surah 69 was a Meccan surah,
meaning that Muhammad was reciting
this to his followers for years. He spent
years telling his companions, "If I'm a
false prophet, God's going to sever my
aorta!" My friends, there are thousands
of ways to die. Do you really think that
it's a coincidence that Muhammad died
in exactly the way the Qur'an said he
would die if he's a deceiver and a false
prophet? Looks like divine judgment to
me.
Third, I don't wanna call Muhammad
"stupid" because that wouldn't be
politically correct, but let's think about
this for a moment. Muhammad and his
followers attack Khaibar. After the
Muslims kill a bunch of men and rape a
bunch of women—standard practice for
Muslims back then—a Jewish woman
comes up to Muhammad. Muslims had
slaughtered her family, and she offers to
cook dinner for Muhammad and his
band of merry men. Muhammad accepts
her offer. "Sure, I love lamb. So nice of
you to cook dinner for us after we
butchered your father and your
husband." Look, if Muhammad doesn't
have enough common sense to realize
he probably shouldn't eat that lamb,
why should we trust anything the comes
out of his mouth? If a woman comes up
to you and says, "Hi, you slaughtered my
family! Care for a delicious meal?" And
the only response you can think of is
(Video clip: "Duh! Yeah, I think so.) Sorry.
You're not a real prophet.
Fourth, despite the fact that Muslims
had slaughtered her family, the Jewish
woman, Zaynab, was actually open to
the possibility that Muhammad was a
prophet. She gave him the poison as a
test. If you were a true prophet, you
wouldn't eat it. If you were a false
prophet, you'd die. Since Muhammad
died from the poisoning, he failed
Zaynab's test.
Fifth, Muhammad's companion, Bishr,
who'd tasted the poison as soon as he
put the lamb in his mouth. Why did he
keep eating? He kept eating, because he
believed in Muhammad. "There's no way
this lamb is poisoned. Muhammad is
eating it. He's the prophet!"
Bishr's faith in Muhammad got him
killed; and I'm willing to lay this down as
a rule: If I can't trust you with my dinner,
I definitely can't trust you with my
salvation. If you can't figure out what's
waiting for you in food, how could you
possibly know what's waiting for you in
the afterlife?
(Video clip: "Ignorance is bliss."wink
Sixth, when Zaynab told Muhammad
that she had poisoned him, Muhammad
said that Allah would never allow it! But
Allah did allow it. So if Muhammad was
wrong about Allah then, please explain
to me why I should trust him when he
tells me other things about Allah.
Seventh, Muhammad claimed that the
lamb he was eating spoke to him and
told him that it was poisoned. So he got a
special revelation, because he was a
prophet. Two questions: (1) Why didn't
the roasted lamb say something five
minutes earlier, which would've saved
Muhammad's life (not to mention Bishr's
life) and (2) Why did Muhammad need a
revelation when you could taste the
poison? Isn't this proof that Muhammad
was actually making up revelations? Isn't
it obvious that he tasted the poison,
same as Bishr, but instead of saying,
"Hey, I taste poison." He said, "It's
speaking to me! I'm a prophet!" Sounds
like a fake to me.
Eighth, think about the justice here. The
justice is just a little too poetic. This can't
be a coincidence. Muhammad did more
than anyone else in history to provoke
hatred against Jews. Muhammad did
more than anyone else in history to
oppress women. Muhammad told his
followers that women are stupid. And
then, Muhammad died a miserable,
humiliating, wretched death after being
outwitted by a JEWISH WOMAN.
So God didn't merely disgrace
Muhammad by severing his aorta,
thereby identifying him as a false
prophet. God added to Muhammad's
degradation by severing his aorta
through the hands of a Jewish woman
seeking vengeance against the man who
had brought her community nothing but
death and rape.
(Video clip: "Fair is fair! We didn't start
this. We didn't mean it to happen, but
we're not giving up 'til you pay. Fair is
fair!"wink
Ninth, according to the Qur'an, when the
Jews tried to kill Jesus, Allah intervened
and rescued Him. This is Surah 4:157-58.
Allah took Jesus safely to Paradise. He
wouldn't give anyone the victory over
Jesus. But when a group of Jews wanted
to kill Muhammad, what happened?
Allah sits back and watches as a woman
poisons his prophet, and he does
nothing as his prophet dies a humiliating
death. Why does Allah protect Jesus
from harm—zips Him straight to
Paradise—then when he turns around
and sees Muhammad wallowing in
freakish misery, Allah doesn't lift a finger
to help him. Sounds like Allah was
showing a little favoritism. Don't mess
with Jesus! Allah won't let you, but go
ahead and feed Muhammad some rat
poison and Allah doesn't care.
Finally, Muhammad's greatest wish was
to die in battle.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2797 The Prophet said,
..."By Him in Whose Hands my soul is! I
would love to be martyred in Allah's
Cause and then come back to life and
then get martyred, and then come back
to life again and then get martyred and
then come back to life again and then
get martyred."
If you read the Muslim sources, you
know that every time Muhammad wants
something, Allah gives him a special
revelation granting him what he desires.
Muhammad wants to have sex with
Aisha, Allah gives him a revelation.
Muhammad wants more than four wives,
Allah gives him a revelation. Muhammad
wants to marry the divorced wife of his
own adopted son, Allah gives him a
revelation. Allah's got nothing to do but
sit around all day making Muhammad's
dreams come true.
(Video clip: "Well, I read about genies
but I never thought they really... It's like
something out of the Arabian nights."wink
Muhammad's ultimate wish was to die in
battle. It was his greatest desire. But
instead of letting Muhammad die while
fighting the Jews, Allah let's him die a
disgraceful death, in utter agony at the
hands of a Jewish woman. Death by leg
of lamb.
After spending more than two decades
granting Muhammad anything he
wanted, Allah suddenly decides not to
give Muhammad what he wanted most.
It seems Allah had a change of heart.
Putting all this together, we found at
least ten reasons to reject Islam just by
examining Muhammad's death. If we
look at how he lived, of course, we have
another trillion or so reasons to conclude
that he's a false prophet. What I find
most interesting, though, is that Muslims
will be upset with me for making this
video. They'll complain about the movie
clips I used. They'll complain about the
things I've said. "David, how dare you
put up a Weekend at Bernie's clip to
illustrate what we read in Bukhari."
But let me be perfectly clear, nothing I've
said about Muhammad comes anywhere
near what God said about Muhammad.
I'll go a step further, If you take
everything that people have ever said or
done to insult Muhammad—Salman
Rushdie's Satanic Verses, the Danish
cartoons, people burning the Qur'an—if
you take everything critical of
Muhammad and roll it up into one big
ball, that's nothing compared to the way
that God insulted and condemned
Muhammad. There's no comparison
between some guy drawing a picture of
Muhammad and God severing his aorta
to humiliate him. God is the ultimate
critic of Muhammad.
So, what are you going to do, my Muslim
friends? Are you going to run around
calling God an Islamophobic bigot
because He insulted Muhammad? Or are
you going to accept correction from the
Almighty?
Islam means "submission". Muslims
think it refers to submission to God—but
God has already given His answer. He
commands you to reject Muhammad. If
you continue believing in Muhammad,
what you're really saying is, "God can't
make me stop believing in Muhammad. I
don't care what God says. I believe in
Muhammad anyway."
But in that case, Islam isn't submission
to God. It's submission to Muhammad. If
you care more about Muhammad than
you care about God, you, guys, are living
in Shirk Central.
David: That's right. I SOLVED the cold
case, so put that in your file.
(listens)
David: No, I just wanna hear you to say
it: "Colombo, ain't got nothin' on me!"
Christianity Etc › Re: Question: Did Jesus Read The Bible? by malvisguy212: 8:47pm On Apr 05, 2015
http://frolickyfingers..de/2011/11/transcript-who-killed-muhammad-by-david.html?m=1

David: Hello? I'd like to report a murder.
(listens)
David: His name? Muhammad.
Muhammad ibn Abdullah.
(listens)
David: I think he was poisoned.
(listens)
David: No, he's the prophet of Islam.
(listens)
David: Well, it was almost 14 centuries
ago, but don't you, guys, have a cold
case file or something?
(listens)
David: Not for that long ago! Don't you
know how important this case is?! I've got
Sunnis telling me a Jewish woman
poisoned him. I've got Shias telling me
Aisha poisoned him, and I wanna know
who killed.. Hello? (snorts) She hung up.
I guess I'll have to solve this one myself
—through a careful investigation of the
Muslim sources.
By the way, to all my Muslim friends out
there who didn't bother to read your
most trusted sources, may I say in
advance: Mua ha ha.
Okay, I've been through the Qur'an, the
hadith, and the sira literature, and I
think I've solved the mystery of
Muhammad's death. It's actually pretty
straightforward. The Muslim sources tell
us that Muhammad was poisoned. All we
have to do is take everything we know
about how Muhammad was killed, and
ask ourselves who would've killed him in
that particular way. Police do this sort of
thing everyday. They match up a bullet
with the gun that fired the bullet. They
match up fingerprints with the finger [of
the person] who left the fingerprints.
They match up details of a crime with
the criminal who has a certain M.O. So to
figure out who killed Muhammad, we
just need to do a little profiling.
(Video clip:
Accused: But the fact remains you can't
prove that I did it. It could've been
anybody!
Colombo: It can only be you—by your
own admission!)
The main difficulty we face is that lots of
people wanted to kill Muhammad. The
pagans wanted to kill him for conquering
their cities, smashing their idols,
slaughtering their men , raping their
women, and enslaving their children.
Jews wanted to kill them for seizing their
land, destroying their communities,
slaughtering their men , raping their
women, and enslaving their children.
Christians wanted to kill him for
threatening to conquer them. Men
wanted to kill him. Women wanted to kill
him. Old people wanted to kill him.
Young people wanted to kill him.
Muhammad made a LOT of enemies.
(Video clip: "What's the matter Rodney?"
"Ohhh, I don't get any respect at all."wink
Fortunately, we can narrow down our list
of suspects by ruling out people who
would've killed Muhammad in some way
OTHER than poisoning. Certain killers
like to strangle their victims; they're not
going to use poison. Some people prefer
knives. Some people set fires. Some
people push their victims off cliffs.
Colonel Mustard wouldn't poison
anybody. He used a lead pipe in The
Ballroom.
Interestingly, the Qur'an tells us how
Allah would've killed Muhammad. We
find Allah's M.O., his preferred method
of executing prophets, in Surah 69:44
through 46. According to the Qur'an, if
Muhammad were to invent a false
revelation, if he were to make up verses
of the Qur'an, Allah would kill him by
severing his aorta. (The aorta is the large
artery that comes out of the left ventricle
of your heart. Some Muslim sources call
it the "life artery".)
Let's look at different translations of
verses 44 to 46 along with a
commentary, so we can get a clear idea
of what the passage is saying. The Hilali-
Khan translation reads:
Qur'an 69:44-46 And if he (Muhammad)
had forged a false saying concerning Us
We surely should have seized him by his
right hand (or with power and might),
and then certainly should have cut off
his life artery (aorta). [Hilali-Khan]
And in parenthesis, the translators add,
"aorta". The Pickthal translation declares:
Qur-an 69:44-46 And if he had invented
false sayings concerning Us, We
assuredly had taken him by the right
hand and then severed his life-artery.
[Pickthall]
Dawood's translation reads:
Qur-an 69:44-46 Had he invented lies
concerning Us, We would have seized
him by the right hand and severed his
heart's vein. [Dawood]
ibn Shakir renders these verses:
Qur-an 69:44-46 And if he had
fabricated against Us some of the
sayings, We would certainly have seized
him by the right hand, then We would
certainly have cut off his aorta. [Shakir]
Just so we're clear on the meaning, and
no one accuses me of misrepresenting
the passage, let me read one of the
greatest Muslim commentaries of these
verses. This is Tafsir Jalalayn:
Tafsir Jalalayn [on Qur-an 69:44-46]
And had he, namely, the Prophet,
fabricated any lies against Us, by
communicating from Us that which We
have not said, We would have assuredly
seized him, We would have exacted
vengeance [against him], as punishment,
by the Right Hand, by [Our] strength and
power; then We would have assuredly
severed his life-artery, the aorta of the
heart, a vein that connects with it, and
which if severed results in that person's
death.
So if Muhammad had been a false
prophet and a liar and a deceiver, we
know how Allah would've killed him—
Allah would've cut his aorta. As long as
no one severs Muhammad's aorta then,
we can rule out Allah as a suspect.
(Video clip: "I didn't do it! Just because
the blood was in my hand, doesn't mean
I stabbed the man."wink
Now that we've got our strategy, let's
turn to our Muslim sources, so that we
can put together our profile. According to
Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, and
other text, Muhammad was poisoned by
a Jewish woman.
Sahih al-Bukhari 2617 A Jewess brought
a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the
Prophet who ate from it. She was
brought to the Prophet and was asked,
"Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." Anas
added, "I continued to see the effect of
the poison on the palate of the mouth of
Allah's Messenger."
People could see the effects of the
poison in Muhammad's mouth. The
poison apparently disfigured his palate,
making his mouth look strange.
Sahih Muslim 5430 A Jewess came to
Allah's Messenger with poisoned mutton
and he took of what had been brought to
him. (When the effects of this poison
were felt by him) he called for her and
asked her about that, whereupon she
said, "I had determined to kill you".
Thereupon he said, " Allah will never
give you the power to do it."
Muhammad tells this woman, "Allah will
never allow you to kill me!" I guess
Muhammad didn't know Allah very well,
because the poison ultimately did kill
him.
In case you're wondering why this
woman wanted to poison Muhammad.
She tells us in ibn Sa'd:
ibn Sa'd, p. 252 The Apostle of Allah sent
for Zaynab Bint al-Harith [that's the
woman who poisoned him] and said to
her, " What induced you to do what you
have done?" She replied, " You have
done to my people what you have done.
You have killed my father, my uncle, and
my husband, so I said to myself, 'If you
are a prophet, the foreleg will inform
you; and others have said it: '"If you are
a king, we will get rid of you."'
The woman poisoned Muhammad,
because he slaughtered her family. I
guess Louis Farrakhan got something
right.
(Video clip: "But as a man soweth, the
same shall he also reap. And that's why
Jesus told Peter, 'Shield your sword,
because those who live by the sword, will
die by it.'"wink
But there's a plot twist here, my friends.
You see, Zaynab didn't act alone. She
had a co-conspirator, someone working
behind the scenes pulling the strings.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4428 The Prophet in
his ailment in which he died, used to
say, "O Aishah! I still feel the pain
caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and
at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being
cut from that poison."
What's that Muhammad? Something
about your aorta being cut? That's funny.
I seem to recall someone telling us that if
he were going to kill you for being a false
prophet, he will do it by severing your
aorta.
But let's keep reading.
Sunan Abu Dawud 4498 - A Jewess
presented [Muhammad] at Khaibar a
roasted sheep which she had poisoned.
The Apostle of Allah ate of it and the
people also ate. He then said, "Lift your
hands (from eating), for it has informed
me that it is poisoned. Bishr b. al-Bara b.
Ma'rur al-Ansari died. So he (the
Prophet) sent for the Jewess (and said to
her), "What motivated you to do the work
you have done?" She said, "If you were a
prophet, it would not harm you; but if
you were a king, I would rid the people
of you." The Apostle of Allah then
ordered regarding her and she was
killed. He then said about the pain of
which he died, "I continued to feel pain
from the morsel which I had eaten at
Khaibar. This is the time when it has cut
off my aorta."
"This is the time when it has cut off my
aorta."
Didn't someone tell us in the Qur'an that
he would kill Muhammad by cutting his
aorta? Notice the passage says that
Muhammad's companion, Bishr, died
from eating the poison. Interestingly,
before Bishr died, he told Muhammad
that as soon as he put the lamb in his
mouth, he could taste the poison, but he
ate it anyway because he saw
Muhammad eating it. In ibn Sa'd we
read:
ibn Sa'd, pp. 252-253 The Apostle of
Allah took the foreleg, a piece of which
he put into his mouth. Bishr ibn al-Bara
took another bone and put it into his
mouth. When the Apostle of Allah ate
one morsel of it, Bishr ate his and other
people also ate from it. Then the Apostle
of Allah said, "Hold back your hands!
Because this foreleg has informed me
that it is poisoned." Thereupon Bishr
said, "By Him Who hath made you great!
I discovered it from the morsel I took.
Nothing prevented me from spitting it
out but the idea that I did not like to
make your food unrelishing. When you
had eaten what was in your mouth, I did
not like to save my life after yours, and I
also thought you would not have eaten it
if there was something wrong." Bishr did
not rise from his seat but his color
changed to that of taylsan (a green cloth)
.To be continue.....
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 8:28pm On Apr 05, 2015
Unbias:
Thanks Bro. As we commemorate His death and ressurection, may our strenght and hope be renewed.
Death could not hold Him captive... Alleluia
A very big Amen to that.
Thank you for this wonderful thread, I was planing to create thread like this but when I saw this, you just reduce my stress .
Christianity Etc › Re: What Jesus Meant By "Fullfiled The Law" by malvisguy212(op): 7:56pm On Apr 05, 2015
Joyful77:
"Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law (the Old Testament) or the Prophets;  I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.  I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law (the Old Testament) until everything is accomplished" (Matthew 5:17-18)

Jesus came to fulfil the brutal laws of the old testament; laws of rape, laws of mass killings, laws of smashing children against the ground, laws of ripping pregnant women open, laws of eating flesh of fellow men!


Op, I will remember this one as YOUR OWN version, as opposed to the ORIGINAL Version that Jesus stated CLEARLY enough!
I thought you are a muslim, from the above post, I believe you are an atheist, this thread is not for atheists. Peace
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 7:50pm On Apr 05, 2015
Unbias:
Pls read the article in the link below. Its titled ' WHY YOU CAN BELIEVE THE BIBLE'. I do not expect you to believe in Christ's ressurection since you consider the NT gospels as mythologized history.

You are probably not aware that other writers in the New Testament aside those of the synoptic and John confirmed the death and ressurection of Jesus Christ on account of which they also suffered and martyred. You may have also forgotten that the Jewish Talmud and other early historians acknowledged the existence of a man called Yeshua/Jesus.
http://www.everystudent.com/features/bible.html
also brother,this link help too

http://www.rationalchristianity.net/jesus_extrabib.html


Tacitus (c. A.D. 55 - c. A.D. 117)
Annals, book XV:
Consequently, to get rid of the report,
Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted
the most exquisite tortures on a class
hated for their abominations, called
Christians by the populace. CHRISTUS,
from whom the NAME HAD ITS ORIGIN ,
SURFERED the extreme penalty during
the reign of Tiberius at the hands of
one of our procurators, Pontius
Pilatus, and a most mischievous
superstition, thus checked for the
moment, again broke out not only in
Judaea, the first source of the evil,
but even in Rome, where all things
hideous and shameful from every
part of the world find their centre and
become popular.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 7:43pm On Apr 05, 2015
gearcoin:
I can now see you surely have problems.
Am not on board to treat your disease.
Please take your time and type and post more. Lolzz
if you decided to reject the grace of God He bestows upon Jesus christ, it's your choice,either you believe or you reject, it's your freewill. Thank you for your time. Peace
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 6:54pm On Apr 05, 2015
gearcoin:
I studied your act in the previous thread also. You always repeat words upon words.
Do you think everybody has time to waste like you.
like other people, I have taken my time to treat your delusional thinking and you persist to remain in your delusional belief do you want me to force it in your brain.
You better use your time well and stop sleeping and waking up on nairaland posting useless thrash.learn how to use nairaland wisely.
It is not a must of us to treat your delusiniasis syndrome, we only quote you to aware the audience your public trash.
You raised a point I dispute it and you did not agree to my point and so what ! You want me to force you or waste me time on you ? which I will never do.
Peace .
let me show you one more error.

Both the Qur’an and the Bible tell us very clearly that Jesus had no human father.
We must therefore ask ourselves this
vital question, “Since Jesus is addressed
as a ‘son’ by the angel Gabriel both in
the Qur’an (Surah 19:19) and in the Bible (Luke 1:35), whose son is he?”
Is it Mary’s? In Surah 19:19, the angel
Gabriel said to Mary: “I am only a
messenger of thy Lord, to announce to
thee the GIFT of a holy son .” Here,
Gabriel refers to a son who was to be
given as a “GIFT” by God to Mary. Since
the Qur’an makes it very clear that the
son is a gift from God, it shows that Mary was only the recipient of that gift. She is not the source of that gift but God. The gift belongs to God. The gift was a son. Therefore, the son belongs to God which means the son was His or His
son. In other words, God’s son. This
testifies to the Gospel truth that Jesus is
the Son of God.

The word “son” means “a human male
considered with reference to both his
parents or either one of them; a male
descendant.” Every male child or person
has to be the son of a father who
produced or generated his life.and the quran keep on calling Him "son of Mary" who was his father? If you don't know the father of Jesus, you do not know the true God.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 5:55pm On Apr 05, 2015
gearcoin:
Buha buhaa ! Which flaw you showed? I can show you thousands of flaws in the novel in your hand called bible.
Please do you have work at all ?
So you typed all these rubish to yank nonsense.I pity for you.
It is glaring you will may liable to high BP over Islam.please continue, I will like to laugh at you more and more.
you don't know what to say anymore then you chose to reply me with abusive word, thank you for your time. Peace.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 5:32pm On Apr 05, 2015
gearcoin:
Is like you have problem in reading line to line.
The power of hatred is that you will never care anything to hurt the person your hated. That is what happen to the Jews. Upon many miracles Jesus did in isreal, they surely knew he is the messiah sent to them so they attempted to kill him which they did not succeed according to quran evidence.

Yes quran admited that Jesus is a messiah sent to isrealite, not me and you.
you must be the one that confused.
why are muslims soo rude when ever they are shown the flaws in there book? You said the Jews know that Jesus is the messiah and they conspired to killed him? Go to isreal now, ask any Jews about the messiah, their answer will be " we are still waiting for his coming" why will they conspired to killed the one who they are waiting for?

According to the prophecy, the messiah will deliver the kingdom to the Jews , all the kings in the bible fought war for the Jews and win it, so when Jesus claimed to fulfilled this prophecy, they are hoping he will continue the tradition of fighting war for them;

Acts 1:6-7
6 So when they had come together, they
asked him, “Lord, will you at this time
RESTORED THE KINGDOM TO ISREAL ?” 7 He said
to them, “It is not for you to know times
or seasons that the Father has fixed by
his own authority.

In verse 8 Jesus told them to preach the gospel to the end of the earth, meaning JESUS CAME TO CALLED THE SINNERS TO REPENTENC.
Mark2:17>>>17 And hearing this, Jesus said to them, “It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick; I did not come to call the righteous, but SINNERS.

That why the Jews did not accepts him as their messiah,because he did not fight war as deed the old testament kings like David,ahab,saul solomon and the rest. Now if the Jew know Jesus is the messiah according to the quran, why will they want to killed him? I repeat,muhammed is very very confused here, he did not no what he was writing.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 5:03pm On Apr 05, 2015
EreluY:
[size=15pt]@ davien, many thanks for the rebuttal. Lazy indoctrinated Nigerians don't see beyond their nose. The latest scholarship on this subject matter is Richard Carrier's "On the Historicity of Jesus" published last year (2014) by Sheffield Phoenix Press Ltd. A 712 pages long, that has been robustly and positively reviewed in leading biblical studies journals, it is the second book of a two volume set, the first being "Proving History: Bayes’s Theorem and the Quest for the Historical Jesus" (Prometheus Books, 2012). Both works, for many biblical scholars, succeeded in demolishing the historicity of Jesus. Why Nigerians keep believing in trash called religion is beyond me.[/size]
Another reason for rejecting God (choosing atheism), is a willing acceptance of satanic deception.

The angel Lucifer (“luminous one”) fell
and became Satan (“adversary”) due to
his desire to supplant God. This was
Lucifer’s single-minded obsession.

He not only rejected God by attempting
to supplant Him, but he urged humans
to do likewise. Satan urged Eve to choose against God for her own self-fulfilment:

He said to the woman, “Did God actually
say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the
garden’?” And the woman said to the
serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the
trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You
shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’” But the
serpent said to the woman, “You will not
surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:1-5 ESV).

LET ANALYSED THIS VERSE;
The tactic is clear: firstly, question God’s
statements, then, contradict God’s statements and, finally, urge rebellion in seeking equality with God.

This manifests in atheists as
1. Questioning whether there is a God to
make statements in the first place, so
God did not say anything.
2. Contradicting the statements said to
have been spoken by God.
3.Seeking equality with God by replacing God with the self.
This satanic deception appeals strongly
to atheists as it bolsters two of their
desired delusions: 1) absolute autonomy —being free to do as they please, and 2) the lack of ultimate accountability—there are no eternal consequences for doing as they please.

May God open your mind to the truth.
Christianity Etc › Re: 14 Evidences For The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ by malvisguy212: 4:55pm On Apr 05, 2015
caxim04:
sorry bros I am a Muslim and I know what am saying.
after 600 years, Allah send muhammed to say they crucified him not? All the Jews and christians who believe Jesus was crucified before the coming of muhammed, if they died, who gonna take the blame of their unbelief? Satan or Allah? Infacte Allah waited for soo long to send muhammed to contradicts the bible meaning All those who have been reading the bible before muhammed arrived if they died before muhammed came, they are going to hell? Isn't it strange to you that All the prophet are from isreal with the exception of muhammed?

Surah 29:27: And (as for Abraham), We
bestowed upon him Isaac and (Isaac’s
son) Jacob, and caused prophethood and
revelation to continue among his
offspring.

The prophethood are to come from the lineage of Isaac and Jacob. Muhammed is from the lineage of ishmael and ishmael had no covenant with the true God.with proved from this surah, muhammed is a false prophet.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Has ALLAH Got To Do With The MOON? by malvisguy212: 4:30pm On Apr 05, 2015
May God open there eyes.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 (of 366 pages)