₦airaland Forum

angelfallz:
The bolded,
I thought i was the only to notice it too. However, note that civilisations collapse gradually, it might be another 50 to 100 years before america collapses totally.

The painful thing is that when civilisation collapse and time consequently becomes hard, women and their feminist talk cease and they hide in the shadows in silence, playing the traditional women while everything is left for men to fix and rule. Funny enough, women will blame men for letting things fall to śhit. Men then become hard, resilient and masculine and build back civilisation under a patriarchy and carry women and children along. When such is done and times become safe and comfortable again, women start manifesting/revealing their natural feminist disposition, demand "equality," blame patriarchy for nonexistent oppression, become unappreciative and disdainful of men who built the civilisation they enjoy and even attribute misogyny to them (We know they don't appreciate and they are operating on the "we no longer have use of you" mindset), etc. That's when you hear nonsense like "the future is female".

Funny enough, the new generation of men, most of them, will be simps who will indulge these women and repeat the cycle. Already, China has learnt from the West and China is pedestalizing men, and investing in masculinity, in their aim for world domination. As long as masculine and efficient men exists, the world and future will belong to them.

*sighs*

@CaveAdullam

Nice one! Your take and my thoughts are in perfect accord.

Baawaa:
You are an unbeliever

I am a hardline atheist.

AdakaBoro8:
how come tithe didnt save adeboye son? these people preach that only tithe can save. which means Jesus death is invain.. who say oyedepo nor go hell fire?

Perhaps he sowed seeds and paid tithes for prosperity and didn't do the same for long life.

Hope he didn't preach miracles and signs and wonders, Lest people start asking questions.

BRATISLAVA:
The usual retort of empty misogynists.

You're taking medicines that aren't dangerous and still have a high degree of degenerate idiocy to ask after benefits.

Strong vessels that are destroying the world. The good news is that men will destroy it and even kill themselves, and it's still the blood of men that will undo the evils that men created. It happened in 1945, it will happen again. The vessels don't disappoint.

Know your place, man. Read it again.

You didn't answer what kparoskii asked. Can you list the benefits? I am sure you don't know, so take your time to google hard.

Kparoskii:
What benefits? please list them
Idiots
Know your place woman
Weaker vessels

UyaiIncomparabl:
I found it sarcastic, though.

... because it is sarcasm. Anyway, renounce your God, and come join me and others in atheism.

KnownUnknown:
God is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as myth, and by the pastors as useful. Now go pay your tithe and stfu

Loud it.

UyaiIncomparabl:
You are cunningly evil.

Did I lie? Stop being an angry thot.

I believe the resurrectional power of Jesus will raise the son back from the dead.

CSTRR:
If Chelsea was efficient, we would have destroyed Madrid 4-0.

Wasted too many chances.

Could have been 6 - 0 as well.

Skipperrabiu:
ar swear madrid no sabi anything wallah fatig go catch after this match na explone dey go sip take sleep body nobe firewood

Playing three defenders, playing Hazard, playing Vinicius Jr as a right back, and using 3-4-1-2 instead of playing the 4-3-3 with the right squad selection destroyed Madrid this night.

Skipperrabiu:
Zidane which kind tactics be dis na from 4 defence to 4 strikers , (benzema , hazard, rodrygo, asensio,) good game the blues today kante go hear multiple hug from tuchel

Zidane's tactics just made Madrid look like Jose Mourinho's 2018 Manchester United.

Benjaniblinks:
GOAL!! 1-1 serves Chelsea right

Chelsea 2 - 0 Real Madrid.

Chelsea is efficient.

Chelsea is the better team in this game.

IamNumeroUno:
I'm only concerned about the Chelsea to win the final. Just because Guardiola allowed you guys to win in FA cup match, you feel you have what it takes to defeat Man City. That was Guardiola sacrifice his Queen for the ultimate Checkmate.

Na so. As if a coach won't win the treble if he can.

Madrid keeps pressing high. Just play with your number back four. I want Madrid to win, but my head tells me Chelsea will win.

waywardpikin:
Remember guys, don't feed the troll. But we can allow she/he/it to keep us entertained should we so desire.

Let's end any discussion about her. Let no troll/female/simp take the spotlight from our red-pill discussions any more. Good night.

waywardpikin:
Hahaha I wish I had the energy to find that thread. Surprised you missed it. Why did you think Zzor deactivated? Everyone discovered that she had one long sausage and two egg rolls between those hairy legs.

waywardpikin:
No be Zzor alternate be that? She/he/it appears to still be in character, which is impressive.

She/he/it was busted a while back trying to scam one innocent but intelligent guy after they moved from NL to WhatsApp. YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN her ITS HUGE MAN HANDS.

Babe/bros/hermaphrodite deactivated sharpaly afterwards, and alternates like the one pining after your asś sprang up in she/he/it's defense.

I like aproko sha

Jesu Kristi! What did I just read?!

waywardpikin:
No be Zzòr alternate be that? She/he/it appears to still be in character, which is impressive.

the Zzòr/Roźcol character is just that of an insufferable thot who needs home training, some IQ points, and serious discipline.

waywardpikin:
A guy stalker masquerading as a female. Can someone please advice me how to feel about this, I'm confused.


Is Martiñez39s's asś safe?

It's safe; my ass will not be defiled. That's if the stalker is indeed a male, which I doubt.

MASTERYANKEE:
Uti is making allots of sense these days

He is a smart guy.

heartofcity12:
Guys are waking up and these females are getting to realize this. I’m glad guys are getting miseducated from the societal norms. Kings, keep maintaining this energy.

Lone wolf seriously doesn't want beta orbiters to drift.

MJBOLT:

Quick maths.

emmaodet:
Gynocentrism is already here in nigeria and there is little to nothing anyone can do. I agree with all you wrote. I don't know why people think they can fight a trend.

I wouldn't say gynocentrism is already here in Nigeria, though there are elements of it here. However, we can safely say that it looms on the horizon given the following:
(1) Massive simp culture,
(2) Mother worship,
(3) The vilification and abandonment of patriarchy and automatic male leadership,
(4) The increasing participation of women in key positions, especially law making.
(5) the scarcity of manly fathers/strong masculine figures who will raise little boys to be masculine and redpilled.
(6) Influence of social media and the subsequent open hoè culture among Nigerian girls. Social media also fortifies and flairs up the feminist disposition of our females, and it acquaints them with the latest feminist and gynocentric trends around the globe. Thanks to "women liberation and empowerment", women are not required by society to improve in character and fitness or to bring anything to the table even though men are still required to maintain their disposability and meet their traditional burden of performance (which is even increasing and getting stricter). For the females, just being a female is enough.

While from my view gynocentrism isn't fully here, these six problems are what is currently plaguing our society. These problems will likely prove to be the foundation of full-blown gynocentrism in upcoming decades.

Gynocentrism and the six problems I listed are not something few redpillers can fight and prevent. A few redpillers are not bigger than the society; few people can't fight the government, politicians, legal institutions, police & military, and the masses who are deep in the matrix. Even hundred Ubunjas can't change the system; even a thousand DEMZÈE (Dapcity) with all his signature braggadocio, uncultured aggression, and patriarchal zeal can't fight these even if he becomes rich, marries ten wives, and lives the patriarchal lifestyle; the influence of society and these things will burst into the home of a modern-day patriarch and other few like-minded individuals through their wives (especially series of bait and switch, her female friends, social media, and subtle parental alienation) and their children (especially the daughters). To combat these, there need to be a serious cultural revolution. For this to happen, the overwhelming majority of men must be red-pilled and understood gynocentrism and they must be on the same page on how to abolish the six vices I listed and gynocentrism (if it exists); a city divided against itself will not stand. It will take generations, years, and persistent efforts. Even the gynocentric structure in the West took years, careful planning, hardwork, media influence and persistent efforts from feminists, and such is still happening; they even had support from men (simps) and the government (with time). How much more redpill revolutionaries who will face stiff opposition from women (who will never agree with us, or they would try to infiltrate us) and simps and the government and constitution (along the line, we will try to infiltrate these two, but it will be hard.)

Jmw2kblogposts:
Like i will always say, leave the thread for people who understand it. You obviously just felt like commenting without any meaningful thing in mind actually. Peace

Your ancestors are proud of you. Keep it up.

angelfallz:
Well said.
I don't think Aisha Yesufu is a northerner. She should be from Edo state.

Noted. I will look it up.

^^^

The modern man, unlike before, will have to oppose society and its modus operandi in living the traditional patriarch lifestyle. Also, since unlike in the past, the modern man's traditional and patriarchal rules begins and ends in his home (society no longer supports patriarchy and automatic Male leadership. It has opted for 50-50 and liberalism), how will he deal with bait and switch when children are involved and when society provides a safety net for the woman to pull her bait and switch and cry out against a family life women and society today deem "oppressive", "misogynistic", "patriarchal", and "toxic" (even when she agreed to these settings during dating and marriage) ?

NB: this post is my opinion. Feel free to counter logically. I stand to be corrected.

angelfallz:
Some weeks or months ago someone was arguing with me that western divorce laws are not biased. That it doesn't matter the gender, i tried to explain to the guy that western divorce laws subtly favour women. That western divorce laws were designed to transfer wealth from men to women.
McKenzie Jeff Bezos' ex wife is one the richest women in the world because she divorced a billionaire.
Probably the same thing would happen to Melinda Gates.

Unfortunately, Nigeria is gradually walking down that path. National assembly wants to create and reserve more seats for women. Once that is done women can heavily influenced laws in Nigeria..

We really need to restructure Nigeria ASAP..

@Emboldened text
Well, some people believe gynocentrism cannot come into Nigeria because of men in power and the Islamic North. A lot of men, even most in the North and those you think are patriarchs, are actually simps. Also, the North is not the only part of Nigeria; even if the North doesn't yield to gynocentrism, can't we have a case where other parts are gynocentric except the North? Even when that happens, educated Northern women (eg. Aisha Yesufu) will subtly collude with women from the South to push "equality" and gynocentrism. Mind you that generation by generation, Muslim men are becoming soft and simpish, especially the educated ones in urban areas; it's only a matter of time. Do women like Aisha Yesufu look like traditional submissive women to you despite their hijab and whatever? She is even a feminist, a Muslim feminist, let that sink in. Does her husband look like the domineering, Islamic, alpha patriarch some aspiring patriarch here wetdream to become? Where is the power of Islam in the face of gynocentrism and already-embraced western influence? Many muslims, especially educated ones, are even being moderate muslims if not leaving Islam or being nominal muslims. It's so bad that you have muslims who are feminists or support "equality," and the rise of muslim women who are demanding that their husbands remain married to only them and not get other wives.

Factors, which I will not explain, that ushers a society into gynocentrism
(1) A safe and comfortable time.
(2) A simp culture and the majority of men being simps.
(3) "Equality" in the constitution and the participation of women in positions of power and lawmaking.
(4) Lack of a manly fathers/strong masculine figures in the lives of children, especially boys. Your mother, female guardians, simp fathers/guardians, will raise little boys to be simps.

Some redpillers might call me a misogynist, but if you encourage women to take up positions of power, become judges/lawyers, decide laws, and even vote, you have no ground to complain about gynocentrism and the propagation of the female agenda. You know fully well, as redpiller, that the females in these positions carry their female nature with them and will always work in accordance with the female agenda. With females (about half of the population) being allowed to influence laws, and majority of men (simps) on the side of the female agenda, gynocentrism is sure to run its course; it's only a matter of time.

I remember, few years back, on nairaland, when I conversed with a female nairalander (ladyçewhy, I think). She, a staunch feminist, played the victim and complained that Nigerian women are suffering and are shortchanged. I pointed out the error in this, and I asked her what the solution would be to her supposed problem. She said the family laws in western countries would be the solution in order to protect women. I kid you not. Even some Nigerian women are aware of the laws over there and they fully support it.

Those who marry now in Nigeria or western men who move to conservative terrains don't know how the existing laws will change in ten, fifteen or twenty year's time; you never can tell when or how it will change. Note that even if you marry before these laws, your marriage and divorce will be subject to the newly passed gynocentric laws once they are passed. This happened to traditional American men who got married in the 40s - 60s only for their virgin conservative wives to take advantage of the new marital, child support, and domestic violence laws that feminists fought for in the 70s and 80s (these are the traditionally nurtured and supposed well-bred wives of the 40s, 50s, and 60s, whom are esteemed by the media and others as the archetypal submissive and traditional wives). Some of these wives even became feminists in the 70s and 80s, to the chagrin of their husbands, most of whom fought in world war. AWALT. (They were submissive and traditional because of the world wars, and they couldn't dare venture feminist talking points. They allowed men go to war while they played the traditional women until things became safe).

Finally, I acknowledge that Islam got a lot things right about women and it's the most red-pill religion among its abrahamic contemporaries. However, Islam isn't just about the red pill, it is way more than that, and it needs a lot of reforms in order to make it compatible with basic human rights, especially freedom of speech and expression, and technological advancements. Also, instituting Islam for the sake of putting women in check and establishing patriarchy in every facet of life will face many challenges: do most people believe in Allah and are they willing to thread the core Islamic path in an age where we know so much? NO! If that's the case and an Islamic caliphate is established, a rebellion will quickly abolish the caliphate or a massive bloodshed and force by muslims will be required to keep the caliphate alive. We already know that an apostate or critic of Muhammad will be killed in an Islamic caliphate, and most people abhor honor killings and a lot more in Islam. Also, a theocracy is as strong as the number of those who earnestly embrace the necessary beliefs and practices of the required religion. It also doesn't help that there is a reason why people flee Islamic countries and come to the west. If you are willing to trade your freedom and rights because you want to put "hoès in check", that's your business; Islam doesn't put only women in check, it also put men in check as well. Perhaps, one can create a system based of (Islamic) red-pill principles and infuse it with secularism and freedom of speech and expression; that's not my headache.

From the onset till now, I accept that patriarchy is good for both genders, but in a time like this where the SOCIAL pillars ancient men had to enforce and protect their masculinity is almost nonexistent, the patriarchy that men of old had shall somewhat remain an unattainable ideal of the modern man.

@Ubunja

I can see you viewing. Please, for the sake of the red-pill growth of people, drop one or things: either what we don't know or something useful concerning one of the things being discussed now or recently. We are all learners here.

NB: you don't have to oblige, you owe no one anything, but if you can when you are free, I will appreciate.

MJBOLT:

Blaqbonez is a talented rapper. I hope he makes it very big.