₦airaland Forum

Adakintroy:
Many of this feminist hide behind compassion and the power of guilt to further their misplace agendas.

GBAMSOLUTELY!

Pete Edochie can say what he wants; it is his freedom of speech. No feminist group is owed any apology from him, and no organization or man should succumb to any feminist pressure group to persecute that man for expressing his own ideas. Who are they to demand an apology from him?

Martinez39s:
HealerH won't see this.

On a more serious note, HealerH didn't specify his god, but he did say ''And I'll tell you this truth, whereas I discovered God by His grace in me and also through my extraterrestrial reflection on his creation,...

He also insinuated that pastors are given their wealth through god, and we know the god pastors claim to serve.

For someone who talks about an elusive god, it is important that you identify your god and communicate his attributes, so that people can properly scrutinize your god claim. I listed abrahamic gods and religions in my earlier post because in this part of the world and in most places, they are the major or only forms of theism and the starting point of many in their knowledge of god.

hopefulLandlord:
isaiah 45:7-8 KJV
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil : I the Lord do all these things.

HealerH won't see this.

continued...

HealerH:
To see that these things are no evil, try to see the world from the perspective of God. That's actually why I told you to join the line and collect your lenses. From the perspective of God, you won't see only the Flood, you'll see the deserts too, you won't only see the Earthquakes, you'll see the Alps too. You'll see the entire world as one harmonious being. From the perspective of God, human rationality has it's limit. The only thing God sees in his creation is Good, no evil. Trying to form intelligent and rational by saying evil exist whereas you haven't seen the entire universe as a unique being is an insult, not even to God, but to scientists who pass months deep down the oceans of the earth contemplating the uniformity of the planet and to astronauts out their in the space contemplating the planet as one unique entity.

You said a lot here without saying anything tangible or reasonable. These gibberish and piffle do not explain why god opted for this world whereas he could have done much better. They also do not explain his indifference and inability to intervene in the situations I listed earlier. You just said huge nonsense that only idi0ts or people who want to believe or keep believing in god will accept; this is because they lack good reasons to believe in god, so anything will do. In fact there is no good reason to believe in a religious god.

The thrid definition of evil (which itself is a false definition of evil) is corporal evil. It relates in some way to the second definition of evil. In this third evil, I'll be using the word "Bad" as a synonym of "Evil" for grammatical reasons. (You'll accept with me that it's more grammatically correct to say someone has a bad tooth than say the person has an evil tooth).

So you realise skin bleaching exist in Africa? Yeah. Because some people have been made to think that fair skin is Good and a dark skin is Bad (evil). I don't need to waste my time explaining that this is a wrong definition of evil nourished by ignorance. Yet I know at least 10% of you reading my text bleach your skins.

This is irrelevant to mention. When people talk about the problem of evil and the existence of god, no one brings up the issue of using bleaching cream, or other trivial stuffs like smoking. You are deliberately being disingenuous because you and I know that humans label these things bad, not ''evil'' as you claim, because of the adverse effects they can have if we overly indulge in them. They label them bad for cogent reasons, not for subjective or arbitrary reasons. You and I also know that the overwhelming majority, except hard core anti-black racists, do not see dark skin as bad or inherently evil. Many people are wired to perceive fair ladies to be more beautiful. That's why a lot of girls use bleaching cream to increase their attraction.

Know this: Whatever you are born into is not evil. Whatever you are born with is not evil. Are you born blind, you're not evil neither is the blindness evil/bad. The question is, "are you a human being?" Must someone have eyes to be a human being? When talking about corporal evils, try to differentiate "what you have" from "what you are".

This is an insensitive, selfish and callous thing to say. People who say nonsense like this are usually not afflicted with the things they are trivializing; it is until they get a taste of it that they come to their senses. You don't suffer like a blind person that is why you are typed this nonsense.

Blindness is bad, congenital inability to walk or hear is bad, sickle cell disease is bad, etc. I can list more and more. I am sure that if you were born crippled, deaf and you had cerebral palsy, you would think lowly of god if he appeared to you and said ''I could have corrected your suffering and limitations with my power, but I left you this way since you are still human anyway. Your condition isn't bad and the most important thing is that you are human.'' If you are not the selfish type and callous type, which I doubt, you would also be angry, confused and disappointed if god told you this concerning your child or sibling who is suffering from these.

The question is ''if god is all-powerful, all-loving, and can change/prevent these things, why are these things occurring even to ardent and kind-hearted believers both young and old?''

Atheist 3: Imagine Pastor John has 5 private jets; Pastot Judas has 8; Pastor Zacharia even bought a Lamborghini for a sex worker. This people can't be men of God. So God don't exist.

The Healer: Lol.
This reasoning is so absurd that I don't want to say atheists use it. The intelligent atheists I know never use it. Na only wannabe atheists dey use am.
Lemme caricature the reasoning to reveal it's absurdity.
It's like saying : "Obi got a new bicycle, Ada got new rackets, even Nneka got a pair of shoes, how can their mom buy them such things? So my mom don't exist."

No atheist uses the opulent lifestyles of clergies to disprove the existence of god. Unlike what you are insinuating, god doesn't give jets, mansions, luxurious cars etc. to pastors The wealth of clergymen which is gotten from the donations, offerings, seeds, tithes etc. of their members (thanks to their beliefs and gullibility.) who are not as rich is seen as a strong indication that church is nothing but business and the pastors are using the belief in god to cash out big time. The fact that members are encourage to sow seeds and tithe when they seek an increase from the divine, but these pastors seek a donation when they need something raises great suspicion.

This suspicion and the way pastors use belief in god to cash out at the expense of their congregations might make one examine one's beliefs objectively to ensure god is real, the holy books are true and that one is not being taken for a ride. It is this objective and critical examination and scrutiny of one's beliefs that usually renders him an atheist.

There's a difference between "a God" and "God". A God is a particular religion's (or a particular person's) experience of God. God is what He is independently of any religion or opinion.
Christianity's experience of God is resumed in the Incarnation.
(Wow. What a holy coincidence I'm typing this on a Holy Saturday... The day inbetween Good Friday and Easter Sunday. These three days resume Christianity)
In the Christian experience of God, God REVEALED Himself to be one of us. In Islam and Judaism, God don't have anything to do with the human nature. These are people's experiences of God. Even traditionalists have their experience of God that is very similar to the Christian experience of incarnation. The traditionalists believe God has something humane in him. That's why they believed he can be made to LIVE with man and that the departed souls of the saints are close to the Him. And I'll tell you this truth, whereas I discovered God by His grace in me and also through my extraterrestrial reflection on his creation, our forefathers (the traditionalists) discovered God through personal experiences and that's why each person had her "Chi" (Igbo). They didn't even do the heavy studies I did before knowing God. And unlike the atheists of today, the traditionalists don't deny the existence of their personal Gods just because someone else's God tells them to do evil.

You are creating an unnecessary confusion and definition. Just simply concede the obvious truth that people simply believe in different gods.


hopefullandlord, 1Sharon, guruinfinite, judybash93, IAmMicheal, Thereddevil, Ketamine9000mg, MrColdsweat, MikeofKd, senchibi, Judgemrntyard, SunshineV, KillGod, akinlolu26624, Jashub

HealerH:
Lol.
Don't mind that headline. My 5th name is Sarcasm.

So I'm creating this trade to expose the confusion and irrationality in atheism.

There is no confusion or irrationality in atheism. Atheism is simply the lack of belief in gods and deities; this lack of belief is virtually due to the absence of solid evidence and sound argument for the existence of any gods or deities. No believer has ever presented any of these.

Mind you, I'm a lover of humans. I try my best to show humans the way... It's my way of healing the world. As a lover of humans, I'm not an enemy of atheists because I suppose they're humans. I'm only trying to show them the way for I see them like my little brethren that need to be educated.

Very well then, let's see the education you have in store for us.

Am I sounding too arrogant? Per favore. Atheism is a failed quest to discover God through critical reasoning. I discovered God through critical reasoning. Why I no go boast? You don't expect me to go around fire and not sweat.

Atheism is not a quest to discover god; it never was. It's simply the lack of belief in any deity due to lack of evidence and lack of sound argument for any deity's existence. You don't believe in the a pink, invisible, ageless, unicorn playing endlessly on planet Neptune for the very same reason atheists don't belief in gods: there is no reason to believe such; no evidence for such, no sound argument for the existence of such. It will be ridiculous to say that your lack of belief in that unicorn is a fail quest of some sort.

So this is how I'll develop this post. I'll be updating it regularly with my new findings on atheism.

I wonder what these findings on atheism are.

The absurdity in Atheism.

Atheist 1. : I don't believe all this fables about God. If God exists, he should talk to me directly about himself. Then I'll believe.

The Healer: This is normal. It's natural for man to experience something before believing in it. But man MUST not experience everything. It's not even a question of "Can or cannot, may or may not". No. It's a MUST. You must not experience all. Did you experience the Big Bang? Did you experience your mom giving birth to you (No human on earth has an EXPERIMENTAL proof that their mother gave birth to them. Don't even bring in DNA testing here because it's never experimental. A doctor going into the laboratory with your blood sample and coming out to tell whatsoever about your parental roots is exactly the same thing like a priest coming down from the alter to tell you God exist. The two information are second-hand knowledge to you. Since you rejected the priest's information because you didn't make the experience of God yourself, be smart enough to reject the doctor's information. The person you call your father and the one you call your mother are possibly not your parents. The only reason you call them your parents is FAITH. You BELIEVED. Now you reject it when it comes to God but accept it when it's about your parents. Wise fellow. Make you no die of too much wisdom o.

It is true that we don't experience everything and we operate on assumptions and intuition in many cases; however, this doesn't mean that any claim a man makes or believes in should be readily accepted without evidence. It doesn't really make the god you believe in real. You can't say god is real by faith because we believe in certain things that are true by trust. Over a hundred gods are believed in by faith, which is the true god? If faith is a reliable tool, why did it lead to different gods? Either one is correct or all are wrong.

By the way, we have good reasons to trust doctors: modern medicine works, they keep on producing results, we are aware of their limitations and they are therefore reliable. Besides, if I trust that the two loving people comfortably raising me are my biological parents and I turn out to be wrong, it has no bearing on my eternal destination in the supposed afterlife and I lose nothing much. If it turns out that my blind trust in the scientists' report that we breathe in oxygen is wrong, I lose nothing and my life moves on without any consequences on the eternal destination of my supposed soul. (Let's pretend to ignore the fact that science is based on evidence, science works; if any scientific fact was wrong, someone can point it out with evidence and win the Nobel Prize and cash that comes with it. Finally a hypothesis must have passed the burden of proof to be rendered a scientific fact. SO THERE ARE GOOD REASONS TO TRUST SCIENCE.)

However, god's existence is of utmost importance as a belief or disbelief in his existence has serious consequences, both to a believer's eternal destination and to his/her system of religious beliefs. Hence, it is pertinent that a proof of god be demanded. Besides, there are many gods out there. Wouldn't evidence be useful in locating the real god so that we don't worship the wrong god and end up in the ''hell fire'', if any, of the true god? If there are no gods or if at least the religious god of a particular believer doesn't exist, wouldn't it render the believer's holy book and belief system false? For example, if people realize that Jesus never existed, wouldn't it render the bible false and reveal it to be a compilation of fables?

Given that it's god's will that a right belief in his existence ensures our salvation and the all-powerful and loving god really wants us to be saved and avoid the nameless infamy and endless torture and torment in hell, rightfully and understandably asking (him) evidence for his existence isn't so much to ask. An all-knowing god knows what will convince a man of his existence, an all-powerful god can easily do what will convince a man of his existence, and an all-loving god wants every man to be saved to avoid the eternal suffering and torment of hell. Given this, isn't it suspicious that there is no shred of evidence or sound argument for his existence? Human life shows no evidence of divine presence or intervention, and events always occur and proceed as one would expect if a god (especially an intervening and all-loving one) doesn't exist and humans are left to fend for themselves as they are hopelessly subject to the laws of the natural world, laws that will never be suspended for the sake of anyone.
<====================>

Atheist 2 : If God exists, why does evil exist?

The Healer: You see, I typed a very beautiful reply on this second question but after a 4th thought, I deleted it and decided to use another form of wisdom to answer the question. You know why I deleted the first reply? Because I used an Islamic philosophy about God and Evil. It's a very beautiful philosophy but I don't know how my Muslim brothers will react to it. Plus Pope Benedict has once evoked that philosophy at Regensburg University, Germany on the 12th of September 2006 and his speech on the philosophy was misunderstood. Actually, many Christians were killed in Muslim countries after the Pope's speech. I don't want my Christian brothers on Nairaland being killed because of someone's incapacity to understand my text. Well, let's go back to the topic.

You wasted this paragraph rambling about what I don't know when you could have just gone straight to the point.

God and Evil? Who told you evil exist? And how did the person define "evil" for you?
Normally, I should have an atheist reply my questions so I can show him the way through the reply he would give me. But I'll reply to the questions on their behalf them. I know say my reply will be so kush they will be wishing I become one of them. No atheist on Nairaland can give a wiser reply.

Of course Evil exist. People have stolen from me, I've lost a friend to terrorism, there are many more evils I can list but let's save the list.
Awon Athee, na this kind thing you dey call evil? How does it concern God. Lol.
God is a perfect Being and he created a perfect world. If you're seeing imperfections (evils) in the creation of God, join the line and collect your corrector-glasses.
See, the only evil in this world is the one created by man. God didn't create them, man did. And asking God to eradicate it is asking God to make your a Simulation... that kind animated pseudo-humans in games (Eg PES, FIFA, Sim City, etc). Those players you control with your pad in video games don't have any freedom of their own. You're their God, their Alpha and their Omega. God is not a game player. He's serious. He made use in his image so we're just as free as he is. Now blaming him for the abuse you make of your liberty is cowardice. Be responsible for your actions.

A spurious argument! Religious gods, especially abrahamic gods, have repeatedly promised protection for their followers and those that abide in them. Given these promises and the fact that abrahamic gods do purportedly intervene in human affairs (usually in a range of manifestations from direct utterances, or through a prophet, to supposed signs, miracles and wonders.) and clearly answers prayer as promised or as seen in instances in the holy book, it is safe to ask why grave injustice, great misfortune, and evil exist, even against ardent and kindhearted believers? Why all these despite his promises and instances of miraculous intervention in the bible and other holy books?

Given his attributes and well defined capabilities, why would he seemingly fold his arms when a little christian boy or girl is brutally raped? If the christian god rained down manna from heaven and caused water to come out of a rock, how come there are christians who starve or even die of hunger? Why does the self-proclaimed almighty and great healer seemingly do nothing when christians, however young or old, perish painfully and die of terminal diseases despite their prayers to him and faith? (Ephesians 3 vs 20, Jeremiah 32 vs 27, Matthew 7 vs 7) Shouldn't the case be different for the children of the almighty? The same miraculous protection he gave Daniel against the lions, the load of miracles, the battle he fought against the enemies of his people, or the same healing he gave to many in the bible is never seen in the life of any christian? I could list more and more instances, but my arguments will suffice; if they don't, then you couldn't be helped in the first place.

Atheist: Bu, bu, but God created me. So as a handiwork of God, whatever comes out of me, evil or bad, has their origin in God.

Yeah friend. God created you. But he created you in a particular way, and you should remain that way. Go look into the eyes of a six-month old baby. You'll see nothing but Good. That's how God created you and that's how you should be. That's the human factory settings. We learnt evil.

You must have a third eye to see unalloyed goodness in the eyes of a baby where others see corneas, pupils, iris and sclera. How do you know what you are seeing in a child's eyes is pure goodness if not that you made yourself believe such? You can say babies are harmless and innocent; we know this is because their minds know little or nothing and they can't do much and are utterly dependent. Can you say this is the way god created humans and intended them to remain? To be clueless, naive, incapable and highly dependent on adult humans for even the most basic activity like bathing and properly defecating? By the way, do you know babies lack a belief in any gods? Should we also remain like babies in this aspect?

Man learnt evil the same way he learnt about god; however, we know human beings, most at least, are wicked because we have the capacity to understand good and evil yet we keep towing the evil route: isn't this the way the creator made man? Why cunningly act like if god made man to be only kind-hearted and wise in deeds then we lose our freewill? If god created man to be good and man turns out bad, isn't he a failed creator? We don't have a choice on the nature of our gender, sexual orientation, skin colour, or height yet you agree that we have freewill? Why can't you admit that we would have freewill even if we are naturally made kind-hearted and wise?

Now there's a second definition of evil I normally should ignore but I fear most atheists here are not intelligent enough to know it's a false definition of evil. It's the "natural evil". The one I just discussed is the human evil.
The natural evil is actually not evil. It is the anthropocentrism of existence that made people call it Evil. Something like Earthquake, Tornado, Storm, Tsunami, Flood. These things are called evil because they make man feel uncomfortable. As if this world was made for man and man alone.

The problem is that god created nature and life and supposedly overseers his creation. Earthquake, tornado, volcanic eruptions that kill and bury people in lava, all forms of terminal cancer, HIV, ALS, famine and draught, birth defects, hereditary diseases, incurable diseases and defects, presence of predators or animals/insect that can poison and/or kill men were all created by god. If the all-powerful god, I mean the all-loving god who made us the focus of creation by making us in his image and sending his son to suffer and die for humans, (something he never did for any other specie.) wanted to create a better world for humans, he could have easily done it. Isn't it then safe to say that the world is the way it is because god wanted it that way or he doesn't just care?

If he permits and settles on this evil world, they we must ask what kind of god is he? A good god worth acknowledging or a monster/brutally indifferent god not worth any acknowledgement? Also this observation is important to believers, especially adherents of abrahamic religions, because it brings up credible and sound suggestions: that their god is nonexistent, humans are not the center of creation (which negates the holy books), and we are just imperfect, insignificant creatures (like other creatures) in the grand scheme of things and we are left to fend for ourselves without the help of any divine deity while being subject to the laws of nature. This suggestion are hardly irrefutable, and they are sufficient to crumble the faith of any believer.

''Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
''Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
''Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
''Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?''

--- Epicurus (BC 341-270)

to be continued ....

hopefullandlord, 1Sharon, guruinfinite, judybash93, IAmMicheal, Thereddevil, Ketamine9000mg, MrColdsweat, MikeofKd, senchibi, Judgemrntyard, SunshineV, KillGod, akinlolu26624, Jashub

Ginaz:
It was my ex who taught me how to apologize . I tend to just lock up and close the chapter of discord with a very cold shoulder cos I hate being at the mercy of anyone emotionally . being cold is a way I get through painful situations.

No matter what you threatened me with ,I always except. If you like say you won't talk to me for the rest of your life o, or no call me again .. Na you sabi. I won't answer you.

Then one day after a very hot argument, my ex called me , made me realise I've never apologized since he knew me. He said a lot of things that made sense and felt like I didn't do well.

That was how I learnt to apologize. My apologizes may be, I call you to ask "how fa", or "how are you?" . that's the most sincere for me cos I fight with all my cold heart to bother to call or pet you.
I'm still learning though, my ex really taught me a lot of things that changed how I relate with people.

I approve this.

Junnior:
The redpill is basically for emancipating the common human. You cannot claim to be truly free if your happiness hinges on the perpetual failure of another person so much so that you would go out of your way to make them fail. That's sick. Isn't it better you just Mgtow? Why get married at all? Some of you take this thing too far.

For me, I am very fine all by myself. I do not have a problem with equality when it's actually equality. So, I will not force my spouse to be a sit-at-home mum. She will decide what she wants. Whatever she does, if she misbehaves, I send her packing. It's that simple. We have been told severally to never invest in a relationship, marriage included, what we can't afford to lose. This allows us to cut and move on easily at any point in time. So, I am hardly one of those that will raise a woman from grass to grace just to marry her.
Women are manipulative, solipsistic, etc. However, all humans inherently want to attain more and more status. It is unnecessary stress trying to hinder anyone from doing that when it doesn't skew your own status/success. Channel that energy towards yourself and be the best version of yourself.

Take jay-z and Beyonce for example. We consider ( or I consider) Jay-z to be an alpha. Why hasn't Jay-z been stopping Beyonce from doing all the exploits she's been doing? She has most likely worked with more artistes and travelled to more countries than JayZ. She's had and keeps having massive success. But instead of JayZ getting insecure, he would focus on himself and keep increasing his worth.

Let's think wide and not narrowly.

Your analogy does not work. Jay Z is also a business man and he is twice as rich as Beyonce. Why would he be insecure?

Junnior:
So, are you guys saying in essence that we should go out of our way to hinder the progress of our wives?

Are you saying in essence that if, for instance, an opportunity comes up that will elevate her, you should sabotage her chances of seizing that opportunity?

I'm just trying to see things from your perspective.

No one is saying you should sabotage your wife's progress. We are only telling you the reality of what happens when a woman surpasses her man, the consequential change in power dynamics, and the monster she shall become. This has nothing to do with being insecure or sabotaging someone to make yourself feel better; the monster your woman will become is a hell you will have to deal with whether you were a good husband or not.

Many people underestimate, or are oblivious to, the hell they would face if they found themselves in such situation; they don't understand that what good thing they might have done for their wives in the past won't matter to their wives when she surpasses them; it won't save them from the resentment, insult, and disrespect their wives would give them. Many underestimate how brutally ungrateful women can be and the extent to which they view and treat us like disposable utilities.

Also, let's desist from trying to be moral champions with this red pill stuff. Red pill is mainly concerned with truths about female nature and the dating market; nothing more, nothing less. The red pill is not a moral creed.

If that's what you mean, I disagree. I would let her succeed all she wants by herself. She can leave afterwards if she likes. It's not a do-or-die affair.
Focus should be on oneself, not on others

What I will not do is help her succeed more than myself. But if she by herself finds success greater than mine, fine, I won't hinder her. She can leave afterwards or I send her packing when she starts misbehaving.

Every mallam to his own kettle. You make it look so easy, and there are many factors and scenarios you fail to consider. Well, it's only experience that can make you understand; I don't have such experience, never will, and I hope you won't. Good day; every mallam to his kettle.

What kind of reasoning is this? Go do the DNA test. There is a possibility that you have a son that needs a father figure in his life.

SeekerofTruth1:
Your Last Paragraph is true as f**k

I also Noticed GLYCOLYSISS is Emotionally weak,and tends to Lash out Emotionally when Provoked. That was why he Had a little beef with you and Ubunja last year on this Thread. I think he Deactivated because Of that Same Weakness,he Couldn't Believe that The same Redpillers he's "helping" in his Thread,were the ones Bashing him all over.
He was Disappointed

Had it been he calmed down and removed emotions aside, he would have handled the situation better. Despite many clarification and how many times it was pointed that Chii59 was playing the victim card, he insisted that redpillers are bastardizing the red pill by conflating it with bullying and he wants nothing to do with it. He wanted to appear right, but he didn't do his diligence. Even if he did, he had already developed a soft spot for Chii59 as I noticed from their conversations in another thread; who knows if they speak offline and the level of their correspondence?

Too bad he deactivated and is no longer part of the wonderful thread he created.

JESHAL:
Glycolysiss reacted in the heat of moment and prioritized his humanism and principles first above amorality, I don't fault him for his decision ,Dapcity247 and Glycolysiss will always remain our brothers in these online manosphere and would be welcomed back into the family

Bullśhit! I know for a fact that glycolysiss developed a soft spot for that silly, infantile, and ego-filled attention whòre called Chii59. I noticed this in a another thread from their discussion. Glycolysiss, in a simpish fashion, and like other men here, ignored the bad attitude, habitual foul language and rudeness of Chii59, which prompted the backlash she rightfully received, and instead he attributed blame to the redpillers who gave that slut a taste of her medicine. He fell for the victim card that Chii59 and the odious fishwife magnoliaá were playing.

Too bad he let his emotions get the better of him. I also noticed a long time ago, at the start of this thread, that glycolysiss weak point is his emotions.

kingxsamz:
I have said it before.
Truespeak and Dtruthspeaker are the same person. That nigga uses his alternate account to reply himself and like his own posts. Like who does that? That's the lowest of lows one can go.

I am convinced, though not certain, that Dtruthspeaker and truespeak are the same person. What a hopeless idiòt.

Your village people are funny in the way they are trying to execute their plans against you.

I didn't bother reading the whole thing. If there is evidence against the boys, they should be punished; these boys are entitled to the presumption of innocence until they are proven guilty.

Lol. Look at this foòl. Playing the damsel in distress while flaunting your sexuality so that simps will come to your "rescue" and give you cash. Idiòt!

truespeak:
See vex!

That is how vexatious and annoying your question is and must be to your Creator!

SMH.

Bros, eh! when you ask a person to give evidence on or of himself, to you, whether solid or liquid, does that not require that the person explain himself to you? Abi how im wan take provide the evidence na?

Your god doesn't need to explain himself to provide evidence. The bible already explained god to a great extent; all that I ask is solid and irrefutable evidence of his existence. Let me give an analogy. I don't need Sherlock Holmes to explain himself to me; Conan Doyle's novel on him already did to a great extent. However, if I must believe Sherlock Holmes was a real person, I would need evidence/proof of his existence. Get it?

[s]Bros, you, creation dey "demand" from your Creator make im give you, creation, explanation whether you wan call am evidence, of imself and E make sense to you![/s]

Evidence for existence is not a detail explanation of one's being, will, method and nature. You are just being very stupid.

Even your small-small children wey still be fellow creations like you, if dem ask you, say "Bros, how old you be? or "Bros, where you come from sef? E dey vex you, now na come your creation, go com dey ask you all these kain question!

Asking a creator's age or origin is different from asking evidence of his existence. Besides, the bible already informed us that god is ageless and timeless, he has been there since the very beginning, and he is the source of all things; however, we are yet to see evidence of his existence. Not even the bible provides such evidence as much as a spiderman comic book is not evidence of spiderman's existence.

I know you, being a very silly man, will let all these simple explanations fly over your head. Besides, why will you be angry if your kids ask for your age or place of origin?

Know thy place if thou art wise!

Silly man. You are making an offense out of asking sound, legitimate questions.

Skepticus:
In my opinion, women ARE ALL THE SAME from all ethnicity, religion and economic background. Here, I'm talking about their capability to exploit men to even to the point of suicide and death if they want to, or are allowed to, which depends on the type of men they are dealing with, societal norms etc. That we know women who don't do such doesn't mean that they can't. It's like saying that no man (even the most cowardly) is capable of violent crime, except he doesn't want to, or there are conditions in place to prevent him from doing it.

Even the Indian women (Arab women included) he talked about being loyal and submissive to their men still have few instances where their men are ripped to shreds when they are in countries favoured by a pusssy-worshipping justice system but it pales in comparison with Caucasian women and women of black african origin because of certain factors like being in small, closely-knit immigrant communities where there are strong consequences for falling out of traditional standards as a woman. As a man, you don't have to let down your guard when dealing with these types (Caucasians and women of black African origin) when you are in these pusssy-worshipping countries, especially when you are ambitious and chasing a decent life (by the country's standard).

For women of Sub-saharan origin (in Africa or in the diaspora) who with the help of gynocentric governments, take delight in ruining the lives of the men who date, co-habit or marry them, it's a bigger and complicated issue. Too much to talk about here.

I wish I could see the comment section of that video. Dude spoke some facts. Too bad I am not on Instagram.

Edit: I downloaded the app and saw the comments.

truespeak:
Wow! Una foolishness no get boundary, kai!

Make Your Creator explain Himself to you? Unto wetin na? Say you be who? Common, ordinary creation wey you be!

You obviously Do Not Know Your Place!

You must be very stupid.
•• Is explaining himself to me necessarily the same as giving solid and irrefutable evidence of his existence?
•• What is wrong, criminal or sinful about demanding that a supposed "creator" whom I have never seen, heard, experienced or felt and for whom there is no evidence should provide solid and irrefutable evidence of his existence before I can believe in him?
•• In what universe is blind faith rational?

Can god give us irrefutable and sound evidence for his existence?

londonbanks:
It's not just the fact that she forgot, it's that she's not invested in what we have. I've taken her out on a couple of dates where the majority of the time she was on her phone and not being receptive to my feelings even though I asked her politely to put it away.

Whenever she wants something from me she uses words like "baby" but soons as I send her money it's crickets from then on. Anytime I text her during the day to see how her day is she doesnt reply back and even when she does its "good" or "okay", quick short answers and doesnt reciprocate by asking about mines.

The birthday was the last straw because I had texted her few days ago and she completely ignored me until the day after apologising but only because hers is coming up in a few weeks and probably doesnt want to burn that bridge. She'll forget my birthday but will post on her stories constantly about other people wishing them theirs. It's clear at this point that she's been using me for money and doesn't care about me. Its always the ones you least expect.

Anyways I appreciate anyone who took the time to read this, your input will be greatly appreciated.

Don't move on, just keep chasing. Idi0t!

Why the hell is this news?

SuperBold:
He was propably using it in Nigeria term like "Chelsea will rape Manchester United"

That is why you should be careful with what you say about sensitive matter.

Rape is not a joking matter, God protect our women and may God set him free from the entanglement

The little boys, teenage boys and adult male victims nko?

fnep2smooth:
Dear lord please prove yourself to this monsters ...... this is a pure message from boko haram that there is no God.

if she be muslim dem for done quickly remove here like the other girl on death row in Saudi Arabia.

LOL. THERE IS NO GOD. THE EARLIER YOU REALISE THIS, THE EARLIER THE BETTER. An omnipotent and all-loving god will sit and watch as a teenage girl with great zeal for him get kidnapped, raped, and tortured for years? If these rumours are true, imagine the mental anguish and trauma Leah must have endured; also imagine how numb, bitter and mentally/emotionally wrecked she would be from the encounter if she is eventually rescued.

For once put yourself in her shoes and realise this could have happened to any teenage female with Leah's mindset and faith when captured by Boko Haram; it could even be your sister. You and I are not special. I won't be surprised if she is no more a believer. Chances are that two pregnancies doesn't mean she was raped twice: she could have been raped almost all day by different men taking their turns; you know male Muslim extremists and rape are like 5 & 6.

Oga, the universe is the way it is if there are no gods, supernatural entities/realms, supernatural intervention in human life, and humans are left alone to fend for themselves while being subjected to the nature and the fortunes and misfortunes it brings. Despite the great noise about God's existence and the transcendence of his power, events ALWAYS occur and proceed as one would expect if there are no gods, supernatural entities/realms, supernatural intervention in human life, and humans are left alone to fend for themselves while being subjected to the nature and the fortunes and misfortunes it brings.

A lot of people won't listen to this. They will think you are evil or insecure when you try to keep your wife below you; they don't know that the problem isn't you but the monster your woman will invariably become when she surpasses you. God help you if you are having a hard time financially. All the extra sacrifices you made for her out of love in the past will not matter to her when she surpasses you, and it won't stop the insults, disrespect, and disdain she will give you. Even if you donated one of your kidneys to save her life in the past, it makes no difference. I pray no one learns this the hard way.

SOZINN:
First of all I'd like to say a big thank you to Dapcity247
May God bless you anywhere you are.
He tried to warn us about this in the past, I suggest you check his profile and read his posts. Back then there were two bastards that were arguing with him. He could have ignored them but for the sake of other men reading. He just kept going. They called him a woman hater and all sorts of names. I don't like to argue, I prefer to just ignore. We've said this before, if your woman is making as much money as you are in a relationship or more money. Just forget it, she'll turn you into a dog. One useless animal or a stupid bastard might still quote me and ask why I'm encouraging men to try and stop women from chasing their dreams or am I insinuating that women should not excel in their field.
I've seen it happen over and over again. Once she graduates and you are no longer on her level, and if you are unlucky she's still young.
Man, I swear on my life, you are fûcked.
You're gonna keep getting that "you don't deserve me vibe". Then if she's aware of these American gynocentric laws, that's double.
You're super fûcked
It's heaven for her and he'll for you. Women want to be with men who are better than them like way better. It's not an ideology, it's nature.
You'll be doing everything just to please her and keep your marriage but in the end she'll just walk away.
Cos she'll always be thinking, she deserves more, she deserves better.
It doesn't matter if you were there for her when she had nothing.
Bro, that don't count no more.
It doesn't matter if you brought her to America. Forget all that, for her to keep viewing you as someone worthy of her submission, you gotta be better. The truth is, you have to be earning way more. She has got to be under you in every way. Most times if you marry a woman with a job, she'll tell you to get a maid, you can't expect her to come back from work and hop into the kitchen. Nah
Women always want the best. When you seize to be the best, they look elsewhere.
Unless they hit the wall, then they're stuck with you.
#Bossbitch
#Liberatedwoman
#Idontneedaman
Once they arrive, submission becomes damn near impossible. They are too big for that now.

willanderson:
These fool was clowned by the same women he was defending. Worst part of men like this is that they self destruct just like the narcissist.

No mercy for Simps

Derrick Jaxn is a narcissist and sociopath; his recent videos after reports of his affairs came to light proves this.

SeekerofTruth1:
Good Morning Guys,my Other Account was banned so I had to Create this New one.

Call me paranoid but Is it Paranoia to Think that This may One day Become a reality in the future?

Given the Abortion laws and Brainwashing done on Boys by their mothers and The media

The picture is literally the wet dream and utopia of feminism.

Jessepaid:
I want to specially thank martinez for his lessons and nuggets....

my session with him was wonderful and revealing....

I got to ask him questions that were peculiar to me and my relationship and the advice he gave was divine....

thank you once again Martinez...

I am glad you benefited. I might get back to you on Sunday evening for some tips.

CaveAdullam:
The future is happening now!

Notice how everything is centred around women and how they (politicians) want to mimic the western world in order "not to be left behind"; that's gynocentrism in motion. Also notice how they talked about "women protection"; this is a vague phrase that could mean almost anything thing disastrous to a man, especially those in a relationship or cohabitation with a woman: it could be an exact replica of the biased domestic violence laws in the west, the alimony/divorce laws in west, the common-law couple stuff, etc.

The sad thing is that if these laws are instituted now, marriages that were solemnized before the advent of these laws will be subjected to these laws during a divorce initiated after these laws were established. Ask many American men who got married in a traditional fashion before certain marital laws were established. That's one of the reasons I shake my head at those that want to marry in Nigeria: they don't know what the laws might be in ten years time. They are only thinking about now. E dey sweet them to born pikin and be the powerful and respected red-pill patriarch in a traditional setting... the pleasurable happily ever after of many.

There are many good reasons I don't want to get married. Even if most people don't share them, they should at least look at the legal bombs feminists are preparing for men who will walk down the aisle. Men, protect yourself.

Hard times create strong men; strong men create good times; good times create weak men; weak men create hard times. The cycle continues till humanity ceases to exist. We are currently in good times which created pathetic, weak men (simps, wimps, hopeless manginas) and they have created, via their complacency, disunity, and stupidity, a gynocentric world which is getting more gynocentric with time.

BLOODYSPERM

What's all these girl power nonsense? Why are they praising her? Is she not a pilot for a reason? Mtewwww!