Martinez39s's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39s's Profile › Martinez39s's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 (of 238 pages)
FRANKOSKI:The person you mentioned is GLYCOLYSISS. He has deactivated his account. |
yorubarere:Especially stubborn simps who are not ready to learn but what to argue, say nonsense, and/or force blue-pill nonsense down our throat. |
yorubarere:I have the same suspicion. As I read the last three to four posts of QuadrilAyiñde, I just nodded in disappointment at how a human can be born a certified clown. Obviously, just like mrcòldsweat, QuadrilAyiñde, since we dashed his plan, is no longer making any effort to maintain the veneer of good behaviour, intelligence, and good intentions he showed earlier. Now we are seeing a blue-pill agent that exudes childish and feminine vibes from his/her posts. As we ignore females, let us endeavour to ignore simps. |
funkmrflexx:It's lamentable that males of today don't know when to walk away instead of fixing the unfixable. Where is it written that you must die on top a particular girl? Is it written that you will die if you leave a toxic gf/wife? A woman who openly shows no remorse is to be done away with. Stop stressing yourself with punishing her or fixing her. Dump her. |
Don't you know false rape accusations are real? Have you been living on a different planet? |
SOZINN:The thing is, as a red pill guy, it is important you live what you preach. Why will simps listen to you if at the end of the day you still act like them? What's the point? Not only will simps not take you seriously, you will give the red pill group a bad name and paint us to be pathetic bluffers. Let's not give any excuses. If you falter, admit it and move on. No one is here to condemn anyone, but you must admit and work on your faults, if any; it's part of maturity and growth. No one is perfect. |
@Dapcity247 Everyone here is continually learning. Based on what you said, there is everyone possibility that the crazy, infantile fishwife cleverly selected certain screenshots to create a context that is not the case; women are experts of false and spurious impression using lies and manipulation. Whatever be the case, learn to stop giving females any unnecessary attention on this platform. Also learn to put your emotions in check, especially your anger. Don't be emotionally invested in discussions. Whatever be the case, we all have your back. As long as you acknowledge where you have faltered, and you move forward in the right way, no problem. There is no need to move away from here. We move on.
|
Horiolah:z × w = (2 × 3) [cos (π/4 + π/6) + i(sin (π/4 + π/6))] z × w = 6[cos (5π/12) + i(sin (5π/12))] |
Horiolah:z = 2 + (2√3)i has three distinct cube roots. z = 2 + (2√3)i in polar form is z = 4[cos 60° + i(sin 60°)]The cube roots of z are 1) z1 = 4⅓[cos 20° + i(sin 20°)] |
GLYCOLYSISS:Good morning. |
GLYCOLYSISS, please modify your post to properly quote the clown. His text is not in the green background. |
luminouz: I swear. He is a chameleon that finally got spotted out. I salute Caveadullam, ichidodo, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, etc who all smelt the charlatan many miles away. I kept on wondering why he deliberately kept using indirect and vague wordings to convey his ideas despite my repeated attempts urging him to be more direct and give his idea a clear structure. I kept wondering why he kept doing this given that he is not an illiterate and he has a competent command of English. It finally became clear that he was using indirect, easily misconstrued, and vague wordings to cunningly win us over and sow destructive seeds in our minds that will nullify the red pill in us. Had he used direct and precise wordings, he would have given himself away easily. To think he had the audacity to raise his shoulders and calmed he was testing GLYCOLYSISS makes me feel like giving him a knock on the head. Anyway, I rest my case on his issue. |
MrColdsweat: I never said they shouldn't. Feel free to verify, but count me and others out. Any attempt at sowing seeds of the NAWALT concept here is dead on arrival. Any attempt at trying to snatch the AWALT concept from us is dead on arrival. Knowing this will save you a lot of energy. ![]() Despite all the patterns all redpillers observed on a daily basis, and are still observing (the red pill proves itself daily), that made them embrace the red pill and the confirmation from others who also observed these patterns, you expect these questions to deter anyone from the red pill?The red pill truth is not like religious or other metaphysical beliefs based on faith. For those who are aware of the red pill, the red pill truths demonstrate itself before their eyes every day, every week, without pause. No one woke up one morning and embraced the red pill just like, they had observed consistent patterns and had real life experiences, and the red pill traced the dots and confirmed what they had observed; as days go by, the red pill teachings keep being validated by what they see in the real world. Where are the demonstrations of the power of religious or metaphysical beliefs in reality? We are talking about patterns that people have consistently observed with their senses in real life, and you are trying to compare these patterns with the beliefs of traditional worshippers who embrace things they have never observed at all but took by faith, talk less of consistently observing. Has anyone ever seen Sango, Ogun, Oduduwa, Yemoja, Eze Nwayi or Amadioha? ![]() You're a mathematician like me who engages in the verification of the truth value of statements, Why are you behaving like the others? If others behave like they do, should you do same? Since you have been trained to find truth, Shouldn't you be most interested in the truth values of the acclaimed truths of the redpill doctrine?Lol. You need to try harder. If Mr Modric observes an infinite sequence of numbers 1, 2, 4, 8, 16,... on a computer. Is it safe for him to assert from the first five terms that any term is double the term immediately preceding it? What if he then takes a step further to randomly pick a thousand terms and, upon investigation, he discovers his assertion to be true for those terms based on the computer, is it safe for him to believe his assertion? If he then meets other men who have the same experience with many random picks, is it safe for Mr. Modric to believe his assertion? YES! If every day, the assertion keeps being validated from the experiences of others, is it safe for Mr. Modric to believe his assertion? YES! This time around, anyone who calms to have found an exception (a number in the sequence that isn't double of the term Immediately preceding it) must prove themselves by presenting that exception. The burden of proof lies of the person calming to have found an exception. You can't expect Mr. Modric to stop believing his sincere observation and that of others because you, in an attempt to sound logical, simply asked him the following: 1) "have you tried every number to believe there is an exception?" 2) "what is the evidence of your belief?" 3) "your experience and that of all others isn't objective truth, is it?" Mr. Modric didn't wake up one morning and made his assertion. In the same way Mr. Modric can't ever investigate an infinite amount of numbers, redpillers can't have experience with all women that have lived, that are living, and will live on this planet; they can't even have experience with every female in their countries. They same way Mr. Modric followed the pattern he saw for himself is the same way redpillers are following the patterns they saw for themselves. If you believe in a nawalt, feel free to indulge that belief; however, until we see irrefutable evidence for a nawalt, we will continue to lack belief in a nawalt. ![]() Mind you, there is little or no incentive to lie here. The red pill is no sweet truth; it's a bitter truth. So why will a large group of men make it up and live it when they can freely indulge the sweet blue-pill illusions of the existence of nawalt unicorns? If there is a magic wand to reshape reality, don't you think many of us here will start turning all women to nawalt unicorns? Do you think we are enjoying all the truths we are seeing here? We accept it because it is reality as we see it, and harsh truth is better than sweet lies. You are one of the pillars of this movement on nairaland. You should be armed with facts and statistics to shut arguers up.As I have said, if you think the red-pill concept of AWALT is faulty and there are nawalt unicorns out there for whatever reason, feel free to indulge that idea. We redpillers are not forcing anyone to believe what we are convinced of. We have nothing to prove to anyone, neither are we obligated to prove anything to anyone. If you think NAWALT, fine; as for us here, AWALT is the case until anyone, or experience, can irrefutably prove otherwise. So if you think you have seen a nawalt, freely go to the plantation and follow her. Redpillers won't hold you back. Hold your NAWALT belief, we hold our AWALT belief. Lastly, feel free to keep searching for statistics and links. Good night. GLYCOLYSISS, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, caveadullam, skepticus, ichidodo, |
yorubarere:Mrcoldsweat started with some truth, but he wasn't straight with his words. Despite my attempts for him to be specific and make him give his ideas a clear and unmistakable structure, he persisted and remained obstinate in making vague statements and introducing other confusing ideas that could be easily misconstrued: the general and vague statements about eliminating gender norms, modifying masculinity, and gender equality. Seeing his recent insistent attempts on subtly trying to eliminate the concept of AWALT, and falsely accusing this thread of harbouring misogyny and hatred towards women should raise valid suspicion. Also, the unrealistic solutions and seeming misapprehension of hypergamy by a supposed redpiller and the backpedaling that followed leave a lot to be desired. This SEEMS to SUGGEST that his earlier meanderings and refusal to use specific wordings could have been a deliberate attempt to build the grounds on which to subtly sow wicked seeds that would germinate and insidiously sway us from the red pill truths. This is plausible and makes a lot of sense. Though he made some good points earlier and people misunderstood some of the things he said, that I grant, his recent posts sound suspicious and they seem to explain his deliberate persistence in using spurious and vague words to convey his ideas. This is plausible, and his aim should be questioned. Many at times, vagueness and mystery of ideas are the bedrock of bùllshits. We should cast a wary eye on him. Earlier on he said we should stop seeing women through a moral lens, but as the animals they are: selfish, wild and unpredictable; but now he is challenging the concept of awalt and accusing men here of misogyny. Here are his recent posts MrColdsweat: MrColdsweat: MrColdsweat: MrColdsweat:No nawalt preacher will thrive here, neither is this place a thriving ground for the nawalt concept. If we actually believe in nawalt unicorns, what then is the need of the redpill? Why not abandon the red pill and go find a nawalt? Why go through the stress of reading and discussing red pill? Redpillers are not forcing their ideas on anyone. If you think there are nawalt unicorns or that the redpill has no solid basis, that's fine and you can feel free to leave. As long as this group exists, the total acceptance of AWALT concept shall remain undying no matter what you say. "what is your evidence of AWALT?" "have you been with all women to conclude that AWALT is valid?" These questions, as insinuated by your post, are nothing new. They are hackneyed questions that we are tired of. They are usually the words of females and simps. Despite all the patterns all redpillers observed on a daily basis, and are still observing (the red pill proves itself daily), that made them embrace the red pill and the confirmation from others who also observed these patterns, you expect these questions to deter anyone from the red pill? You need to do better. Even though we can't prove our experiences to you, our observations are enough for us, we go by them, and we are not bothered to prove it to anyone. If you think nawalt unicorns exist, fine for you but we are not participating no matter what. So if at all your aim is to make us doubt the AWALT concept, you are free to go on but you will be wasting your time. Finally, science and religion are not the same in an abstract way. NB: these are my observations and disagreements with Mrcoldsweat. GLYCOLYSISS, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, skepticus, caveadullam, ichidodo. |
@Godoverevery Do not allow any disingenuous rationalization from any female to confuse you and doubt you stance. These women are pure evil and selfish. Take care. |
Godoverevery:I told you so. |
Godoverevery:You have said it all. |
Godoverevery:Of course, Imàlma1 will do the same. All women are basically the same. Even your sister who was shunned by your sister-in-law will do the same to her husband's siblings when she gets married. Self-centeredness, cold-heartedness, and manipulation: the canonical keywords by which we understand female behaviour. |
Godoverevery:Don't bother arguing with any female or expecting her to hold her gender accountable and concede their fault and nature. They are full of śhit. I blame the weak and silly men of this generation. |
Slynation:Gbam!
|
Dapcity247: You can be funny at times. Are you a Christian conservative? |
MrColdsweat:You can do as you like. The reason why it was suggested you open a new thread is because dissecting your opinions and discussing them, to understand your points exactly, will take copious amounts of space. Besides, due to the diversity of topics discussed here regularly, it would be best not to have any distractions when discussing your ideas so they can be given the undivided focus and followup they deserve. The acclaimed Hypergamous nature of women is a major part of the redpill gospel. My message does not only correlate with it, I proffered a solution to hypergamy.I disagree here. Hypergamy is hardwired into the DNA of female creatures. Hypergamy exists independent of any choice men make: whether all men go monk mode, pua, mgtow, etc, women will remain hypergamous. Even if men become masters in controlling their sexual urges, women will still be hypergamous. As long as females exist, hypergamy cannot be eradicated. Hypergamy is the unrelenting, overcomeable, ceaseless, tenacious and inherent biological drive in ALL females to the get best superior mate available to them. Hypergamy doesn't take a rest or go on vacation, it operates 24/7. I doubt you really know what hypergamy means. Had it been you said female entitlement, waywardness, and delusional overestimation of themselves are at an all time high and simps (men) are enabling and inadvertently fortifying these, you would be right. Other than that, you missed the target by a mile. There are many problems with the male gender. The stoic nature of masculinity is the number one killer of men. Men are expected to be stoic and bottle their feelings. Because of this, many men are not expressive. They go through life with depression and constant pressure. Many men would rather keep being depressed and die as men, than express their pains and seek therapy to battle their depression. This is bad.Stoicism is not bad, stoicism doesn't entail becoming an emotionless robot and ignoring any internal conflict that could incapacitate you. What is bad is the disregard for men's issues and the great and undivided focus on women's problem thanks to the gynocentric and feminist outlook that has been engulfed society. This disregard is not due to stoicism but the gender-based disregard for men by a world that entirely judges men on their utility and disposabilty. As a result men are expected to regard their issues as unimportant, not complain about anything, endure any bullśhit and unfair treatment and double standards thrown at, and perform no matter what. Women are pedestalised and treated with much value than men. Men can still develop a thick skin, develop resilience, discourage emotional incontinence and still talk about real and serious issues that face them. They need to because life doesn't favour weak and fragile men. I agree with you that we should talk about men's issues. I am here to encourage men to break gender norms so that we can live longer and be happier. Afterall, this is the ultimate goal of the redpill movement: putting happiness first.If your message is to be digested and understood, you must be specific and make your point with great precision. You can't just say "men should break free from gender norms", that's vague and confusing. What gender norms exactly? Is it all or certain gender norms? Instead list the certain gender norms you want men to discard and why you think men should discard them. From there, you eliminate confusion and give your arguments a clear structure. |
TheUndercover: |
Nothing special. Overrated, meager beauty.
|
ichidodo:I get what you are trying to say. I have no problem with your perspective. However, Mrcoldsweat is not saying men MUST rush every job that are, or were once, considered feminine, neither is he saying these jobs must be imposed on men. Men can rush high paying jobs, I advise them to, but what if a man is broke and incapacitated and a vacancy at a hair saloon or day care is the only source of little income at the moment? Should he go hungry and starve because he would be seen as a lesser man doing a feminine job, or should he drop the ego and that mindset and work to survive while he finds something better? The mindset and ego that would have preferred him to starve serves him no purpose, and that's what mrcoldsweat thinks should be discarded from the supposed archaic idea of masculinity. Mrcoldsweat is trying to reconstruct our idea of masculinity to one that is better suited to thrive in today's world. I don't think he is saying you should become a weak, feminized man without some spine. NB: this is simply a clarification of mrcoldsweat's point. It's not written to reflect my thoughts. Seems mrcoldsweat needs to articulate himself better for the sake of others to avoid confusion. |
Dapcity247:As I said, I will go back to earlier posts to understand mrcoldsweat better. Your interpretation of mrcoldsweat argument is very dangerous for the redpill community, as it can mislead many especially new redpillersNo it's not. I gave a summary and interpretation of mrcoldsweat's argument. I didn't say I agreed with it, I didn't say I disagreed with it. My purpose for writing that summary is to for people to understand mrcoldsweat better since his choice of words lacks great precision to many. It's up to anyone to decide if they agree or not. My understanding of your interpretation is that you stated evidence that women are embracing masculine careers except very risky occupations like bricklaying , mechanics, post sexual revolution has changed the culture of humanity for good and most probably we are not going backI gave no advice, neither did I make any suggestions. My entire post is simply a summary and interpretation of what mrcoldsweat is trying to pass across. I am not pushing anyone to accept it. Again, read mrcoldsweat's post and then read my summary to ichidodo, word for word. |
Dapcity247:Read to understand, not to respond. Put emotions aside. I didn't write my arguments. I was giving a report and interpretation of mrcoldsweat's argument to ichidodo. None of what I wrote was my argument, they are a summary of what I think mrcoldsweat actually meant. I don't believe at all men should sacrifice their masculine roles and embrace feminine role, masculine careers will always be more profitable than feminine professions as they are risky and require more time, why should men settle of less,are you saying we are incapable of competing with our fellow women and menYou are putting words in my mouth and in that of mrcoldsweat's. Read my summary again. You don't understand what mrcoldsweat wrote. He is not saying men should abandon their masculine roles. We are no longer in the industrial age, we are now in information age, the rules of success for both ages are completely different, women are so uninformed and unintellectual that they are dominating the academics which require obsolete systems and subjects that doesn't guarantee success or even financial security in the future, because they are so Solipsisitic and can only function in groupthink dogma as they are incapable of real logic and intellectual curiosity, they are fooled and brainwashed by mainstream media who don't care about women's actual welfare but function as proxies for welfare government and crony-capitalist to embrace out-modeled masculine professions to provide cheap labor for their bosses in the workplace, they are used up as slaves and fed handouts by governments who don't care about them.Well, I was only giving a summary of what he said. I am not saying you are wrong or mrcoldsweat's is right. I just giving a summary to help others understand what he is trying to say, that doesn't you must agree with him. |
ichidodo:I am not saying I disagree with mrcoldsweat, and I am not saying I agree with him. I have read mrcoldsweat's post, the one above yours. What he is trying to say, I think, is that the society's status quo has changed, it's here to stay and it's not going back anytime soon to the traditional way of things no matter how men desire traditional life. On a societal level, things have changed. Therefore, according to mrcoldsweat, men must learn to adapt and flow with the tide and not remain rooted in CERTAIN archaic stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity that are limiting men and serving them no purpose in the modern world. Mrcoldsweat isn't saying in his last post that you should lose your balls as a man and become feminized, all he meant by modifying masculinity is that we put aside our egos and certain useless, archaic, and unproductive stereotypes and beliefs about masculinity and do what we can to make headway in life even if it comes down to doing certain jobs that were traditionally considered feminine like nursing, working in a hair saloon, babysitting in a daycare etc. He is not saying men must do these jobs, all he is saying is if a man can make profit from these jobs and if he wants to do it, he shouldn't be seen as less a man and his ego shouldn't stop him since we don't consider a woman who becomes an engineer or doctor (former masculine professions) less feminine by society's standards. If women are now given rights and opportunities as men, and they are free to pursue any job or career, it shouldn't be different with men. Hence the ego and mindset that would make a man rather go hungry instead working in a daycare because he think it makes him less masculine should be abolished. At any rate, mrcoldsweat's argument is reducible to the adage "as hunters learnt to shoot without missing, birds learnt to fly without perching." He is telling us to adapt or lose out. I think that's what he meant by modify masculinity or lose out. I will still read his earlier posts to undeserved his arguments betters. |
I am happy for you and the peace of mind you now have now. No good man should be made a victim of paternity fraud. |
Soulrebel2:I am not saying you don't fùck without emotions. Your initial post confused me. The term cheating only applies to those in any form of agreed, mutually, committed relationships. So when you said that women can't cheat on a redpiller and that they only cheat on simps, I understandably presumed you meant supposed redpillers in committed relationships. After reading your latest post to me about how you don't keep commitments in any form to a woman, I would have said you probably meant there is nothing for a woman to cheat to begin with since you are not a guy of commitment; however, you gave a reason for your statements which I I emboldened: women adore redpillers. Is it that there is nothing to cheat since there is no commitment? Or is it that you think a woman can be made to adore a man she is in a committed relationship with so much that she won't cheat? I hope I am not witnessing a disingenuous backpedaling; if it is, then there is no shame conceding one was wrong like when I conceded I misread and judged mrcoldsweat hastily. We learn every day. Anyway, for the sake of our edification, what exactly did you mean by the following statement: "A woman can never cheat on a redpiller..a woman adores a redpiller. Women cheat on SIMPs." ? We learn every day, let us learn from you. |
Finally, for the night, I urge everyone to live the red-pill life just as they profess to be redpillers online. If you are discovered to be a hypocrite, don't blame anyone for not taking you seriously. What's the point of simps and other "mumu boyfriends" listening to you when you act like them at the end? |
@Caveadullam I get your point. I never said you were wrong in your analysis of his post (neither did you). However, I thought on my part I should have read his posts thoroughly before venturing any disproval, however slight. The screenshots you provided undermined his credibility as a redpiller, which it should but I thought before I spoke, I should have done my due diligence. I say this because I perused his posts and that of others without much deep thought and GLYCOLYSISS later conveyed to me the prospects of mrcoldsweat being misunderstood. Personally, as it is, due to not reading thoroughly, I don't know for certain who hit the nail on head but I will thoroughly go through mrcoldsweat's posts and the subsequent posts that engaged him when I have the time tomorrow. It's a case of "I want to read and see the context for myself." Thanks to you, we know for a certain that mrcoldsweat isn't a redpiller in practice even though he professes to be one, but my recent posts are solely focused on his arguments and the truthfulness, if any, within. Have a great night, wise guy. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 (of 238 pages)
As I read the last three to four posts of QuadrilAyiñde, I just nodded in disappointment at how a human can be born a certified clown. Obviously, just like mrcòldsweat, QuadrilAyiñde, since we dashed his plan, is no longer making any effort to maintain the veneer of good behaviour, intelligence, and good intentions he showed earlier. Now we are seeing a blue-pill agent that exudes childish and feminine vibes from his/her posts. 

