₦airaland Forum

sajmark:
One thing I observe is that, once a guy is in a relationship where he is already simping... It is very difficult to transform/become ALPHA in that very relationship no matter how many redpill he swallows.
So I will advice all new comers to stop taking their pre-redpill relationships serious because first impressions matter a lot and how you start something is often how it ends, as far as that relationship is concerned: Once a simp always a simp.
After taking the redpill your old life has passed away, start new relationships and enter with redpill frame and game.

Your observations are correct. Your suggestion is on point. First impression matters.

SMH. Stupidity.

Uptheante:
I'm really impressed by ur reply.
I've left that area for now cos I'm hustling somewhere far away.
The point is this:
I'd rather ignore her greenlight for now than for me to run sheepishly & fall into friendzone.
I rather not play that match than to play & lose woefully.
I can't imagine myself being friendzoned by a girl.

Where I am right now, I have plenty girls on my radar, just wanna get ur esteemed opinion on this issue

Nothing spoil. Always keep in mind that no pùssy is a must-have pùssy; don't have the mindset that a pùssy must be banged eventually no matter what. If it happens that you won't get to fùck her puśsy in this life for some good reason, it's no big deal and so be it. Women abound. Focus on the ones that you can meet without headache and too much stress.

Uptheante:
Nice output.
I wanna seek ur opinion on this issue
Is it really a bad idea to ignore a girl who is giving u green light signals because of environmental factors?
What I mean is that this girl lives in a highly restricted house where she is constantly monitored & if a guy wanna relate with her based on banging matters, e no go work because she no fit go outside without being monitored by her guardians.
If guy man want to relate with her based on dating levels e fit fall into the dreaded friend zone because she won't be allowed to visit u for romance to even happen.
One can only visit her in full glare of her guardians & everybody.

Is it adviceable to ignore her & act mysterious till when she leaves that restricted setting & is free so that one doesn't fall into the irredeemable friendzone?

Is it not better to ignore her for now till an opportuned time so that one doesn't become friendzoned?

It’s not every greenlight one must respond to; It’s okay to ignore if you are simply not interested.

That being said, tell her to make time for both of you since she understands her guardians and the curfew, if any, they've set. Let her tell you when she is usually free or away from the prying eyes of her guardians so you both can know how you will see and bang the hell out of each other. If things are too cumbersome and hectic for you to navigate —as per when she free for you guys to meet— maybe because of the time, location, and extent of guardians monitoring, it is okay to close her matter and move on to other girls. If you linger, you risk the friend zone because you will inadvertently look desperate. When she is ready and free later on at a point (eg. her guardians relaxed; she now has a good job and she now stays on her own with freedom; schedule changed and is now convenient for you both etc.), she will come around. She will put in great efforts to see you if she wants you. Chill!

If you guys are able to successfully meet and bang on a steady while she is still under strict monitoring, note the following:

(1) Make sure you don't meet her at her place to fùck because if you both are fucking and someone unexpectedly drops by or her guardian who travelled or went to work comes back usually early, she will throw you under the bus unexpectedly even though she was enjoying it and screaming "harder! Faster!" She will say it was you who forced yourself on her, all to protect her image of a holy and chaste lady in the eyes of her guardian. Your only saving grace will be if the guardian or neighbour/visitor doesn't buy her smelly bullsh!t. The guardians will likely believe her since they see her as a good and upright girl, and the only way for a good and upright girl to get your d!ck is through coercion... according to their mindset. Moreover, some guardians are crazy and they might harm you.

(2) Also, if you are fùcking her, don't overdo it so that she doesn't break her curfew. Once time has reached for her to go, demand that she leaves and come back when next she is free. This is to avoid raising suspicion on her guardians part. Also, some women can be emotional that they get carried away by d!ck pleasure and damn all the consequences; if such happens and she comes back late and her guardian thoroughly questions and drills her to the point she can't lie or cover up, she will likely throw you under the bus to protect her image and the guardians will likely believe her since they see her as a good and upright girl, and the only way for a good and upright girl to get your d!ck is through coercion... according to their mindset.

Any more questions?

Dizzyyish:
Women are powered by a deep cycle battery consisting of solipsism and egocentrism. In other words, every single thing a woman does is for her benefit. Unlike man that would sacrifice himself financially, emotionally or even physically for a woman--a woman only acts on what will benefit her in the short or long term.

If one were to keep this in mind, one would see that whatever a woman does is for her gain in some shape or form. For example, if a man needs a job/loses his job she will actively push him to seek work or she'll find and seek out work for him---to the average person she might seem 'supportive', a 'wife material' of sorts but in reality she does this because she lives off his livelihood, and if not currently (dating) then later (marriage).

Another example, the friendship between a male and female---whereas a male would befriend a female for the sake of friendship, a female will befriend a male for money/gifts, favors or free attention (their sustenance). "If we're friends I have to be getting something na" she thinks to herself.
If a female gives a gift or money to a male, she doesn't do it out of the kindness of her heart... it serves as ownership over the male (one of the reasons they'll be quick to bring it up during a disagreement) or as an investment; with this selective generosity she plants the single seed of a gift in the mind of the oblivious male, which will yield the fruit of ten gifts (in the long run) for her.

During a stroll I walked past a lady and two guys having a discussion. The lady exclaimed to the effect of "Yes nau, is that not what a relationship is for? A relationship is for two people to be 'using' each other.." By convincing herself with that, she can now rationalise her exploitation and manipulation... smh.. at least she was honest...

Another common example is the employment of chameleon tactics---e.g. cooking for him, cleaning for him, arranging his home etc.; as established earlier, these 'good' deeds serve as her investment goal (marriage), in which, like a chameleon, she will (slowly) revert to her true colours after getting her "ROI."
These chameleon tactics can also be seen with "pickmes" and "men's rights advocates"---who do not really care for whatever struggles a man goes through, but rather "support" and "advocate" for men so men perceive them as "caring" and "empathetic" women worthy of having a protector and provider.

Remember: A woman's self-serving interests will ALWAYS be her number one priority, it will always be in the forefront of her actions and words whilst it lies under the guise of "love," "concern" and "empathy"---only visible to those aware of her nature.

Another easy to spot example is with the way or manner women give relationship advice to men. They will project themselves unto the female and the advice will almost always benefit that female in the relationship (often to the disadvantage of the male). E.g.
"Your girlfriend cheated on you? Please forgive her, she won't do it again"---Translation---"Because your girlfriend slept with someone you want to deprive her of your resources? Please stop being wicked."

Good thing you have sense and you see things as they are instead of getting carried away. They are many things women do that appear nice, supportive, virtuous and good, but there are selfish intentions underlying these deeds. This is why, in addition to finding nice guys as a turnoff, they are always suspicious of them.

Cypress042:
Real niggars, even when there is gas chew the damn thing and swallow water

Am telling you.

Odunharry:
In other words, No start wetin you no fit finish..

Nice! Another good way to put it.

Maintain your sharpness for life. One thing people don't take seriously is that all your efforts in maintaining frame right from the moment you met the girl wouldn't matter when you soften up and start simping big time down the road. It doesn't matter if you have been maintaining frame for twenty years and your application of the red pill has been impeccable so far, one or few moments of simping big time (or going amiss big time) can spoil everything and deal irredeemable damage. Your previous efforts won't save you. Ensure you are always on your A game.

Female nature won't let a woman allow a man she perceives as a beta and simp to get away with or successfully carry out alpha moves on her (except he has leverage and she benefits from tolerating such). Betas don't get away alpha moves. One a woman sees you as beta or simp (probably because you simped for her big time, defied red pill rules or you let her walk over you), it is nearly impossible for her to ever see you as an alpha again and give you alpha benefits. If she is in a marriage with, she will endure but the pussy has dried forever. First impression matters.

Counter opinions are allowed.

Calibrator:
Why will a man being the stronger sex allow himself to be raped in the first place?

I think men are supposed to be a walking bag of muscles regardless of age, why can't an underage overpower his paedophile female teacher and force contraceptive drugs down her throat to prevent pregnancy?


Should I stop now or continue being tranquil with the truth

Don't stop o. Who knows if the boys enjoyed it and actually wanted it? Maybe they did something to put themselves in that position; maybe they didn't maintain frame well enough to compel respect. No woman would try such nonsense if they maintained frame.

#sarcasm

Rollo Tomassi has tried for the red pill community and manosphere. He is the author of the following books in the Rational Male series:
(1) Rational Male (volume 1)
(2) Rational Male: Preventive Medicine (volume 2)
(3) Rational Male: Positive Masculinity (volume 3)
(4) Rational Male: Religion (volume 4)
(5) Rational Male: The Players Handbook (volume 5, recently released)

I have only read the beginning of first book. I now plan to properly read all of them later this year. Have you read any of the books? If yes, what red pill lessons did you learn? How did his books shape your understanding of female nature? Any criticism?

heartofcity12:
Both gender is capable of perversion..
When i scrolled through the comments, a lot of ppl were blaming the boy for “kiss and tell”, some men were wishing they had teachers like this when they were at his age, reverse the case if it was a male teacher that has done this to a 16 year old girl.. These are the issues..

In the US, there are tons of cases of female teachers having something sexual and romantic with their underage male students. It is commonplace, but the double standard is not surprising. In case you don't know, if an underage student impregnates his female teacher, he can be sued for child support by the teacher when he turns 18 and he will be legally obliged to pay. The fact that he wasn't a consenting adult doesn't matter.

The same applies if a girl, or a group girls, rapes you and pregnancy results.

Nothing new, but it's worth repeating. The first impression matters. Have it in mind that one shouldn't relax or simp along the way.

Dliquidmetal:
don't forget to remove your contact asap boss

Edit out his contact. You forgot to do it.

Regex:
********. That's OK. You just message me.

I have saved your contact. I will contact you later this evening.

@Regex

How are you doing? I will like to speak to you on WhatsApp.

CaveAdullam:
Awesome post!
.
.
.
PS: This was meant to be an appraisal of your post but it just came better as:
DAY 160, REDPILL 2022

Authority: Violence does not pay. Maintain frame.

Great points as expected. I will like to add that I don't condone violence or abuse and I wouldn't want anyone, male or female, hitting people for the sake of it. I am against unnecessary altercation and needless escalation. However, my two lengthy posts are just focusing on the case where a woman decides to physical assault a man for no good reason. The posts also dismantle the arguments and excuses underlying the notion that a man shouldn't retaliate and defend himself against a woman and they briefly point out the consequences and results of such blue pill mindset.

heartofcity12:
Well said

Most surprising is that there are post made by almost everyone here, including those two, that anyone can similarly ask "who cares?" and easily attribute to them what they attributed to DièRich5. Anyway, we move.

heartofcity12:
You’re just noticing such acts on this thread? This is not the first time. One of those monickers you mentioned always try so hard to make redpillers seem like bitter ppl hating on women, like we’re doing too much and not applying “common sense” where it is due. What Dierich5 captioned and posted is just the reality no matter how harsh that might sound but you can clearly see how they twisted the whole narrative to make him look bad. You won’t see them using that energy to commend great posts they find useful but they can’t wait to criticize and look for plot holes in posts they could have simply ignored..

I really don't know the cheap points, if any, they were bent on scoring. As I have said here before, this thread is not centered around anyone. As long as someone isn't breaking the rules of this thread and his post and discussion are in line with the purpose of this thread, he can post what he wants. If you don't like it or you feel it is the same old news and nothing surprising, simply skip it and keep scrolling. If the discussions that are dominating the thread are not what you want to see, simply take a break and come back later or start your own discussion. How hard is that? I thought life is simple and shouldn't be complicated. If redpillers decide to discuss or reference the Amber Heard situation tomorrow, they can and are permitted to do so; it doesn't take anything away from them and they are forcing no one to care or participate.

It is selfish and thoughtless to act like a discussion shouldn't take place because you have moved on from the topic and you are tired of hearing it, and then get worked up or express disapproval when people exercise their liberty to engage in such discussions. Others are not obliged to flow with you. People won't desist from a discussion because of you; this thread is not centered around anyone. Worse is when the people exercising their liberty to engage in their discussions are misrepresented and have tones, intentions, and attitudes wrongly attributed to their posts in a bid to make a nonsensical and irrelevant point instead of focusing on the message being passed. Worse is when one of the people displaying all I have written happens to be a nonredpiller in a red pill thread (what the hell!). SMH. This is really not the first time such nonsense will befall this thread.

Tonnyray:
Perfect take. You get time for shalaye sha. Your position is excellent and obvious to the discerning. Those first 2 words of yours actually sum it up: Who cares?
Johnny Depp’s victory is a victory for men the world over. End of story. Men don’t go about bitching on who she’s fvcking now. That’s some unmistakable female energy. It’s women I know that keep checking your social media pages and status just to see how you’re doing without them after a breakup and whether the bitch you’re now fvcking is prettier than she is. A man simply isn’t bothered, he has moved.
We have moved beyond the victory over Amber Heard. She can post threesomes with Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos for those who care.

tripleking64:
Thats it

You both are really taking great efforts to misconstrue DieRich5's post and attribute to him a tone he clearly never expressed. For the record, he obviously wasn't displaying feminine energy by BITCHING about the guy making serious romantic proposal, not fùck proposal, to Amber (he wasn't even bitchiñg); who can honestly say with utter convinction that he was bitchiñg without clearly assuming what isn't there? To claim such is simply to wrongly assume things that are clearly not there and impute an impression that no one gave you both.

We clearly don't know how he came upon the news yet you compare his acquisition of the picture to the stalking done by females. This is clearly an irrational and shocking comparison not even a secondary school student should make. Why is this? Did he say he was stalking Amber Heard? What is really going on here and what are you both trying to achieve? SMH. When did he ask anyone to care?

DieRich5 simply gave a report to pass a good message that reflects what happens in the real world, in the spirit of this thread. His post is not out of place with the tradition here as long as he didn't break the rules here. His reporting might not comes as surprise to many here, but we have the option to skip his post and go on to next that we find useful instead of reading senseless meanings into his post and wrongly attributing a tone and impression to his post... things he explicitly never intended and that you both greatly assumed.

From asking him "who cares?" and wrongly assuming he is competing with females and making red pill a confraternity to wrongly saying he is displaying feminine energy by bitchiñg and comparing his report to female stalking. Gosh! What nonsequitur. This was the same way redpillers were accused of "hyperventilating" simply because they ruminating on the known topic of hypergamy and expressing the importance of enlightening other guys. There are many things others, including you guys, have written that one could ask "who cares?" if we apply your logic and mindset.

Stop reading nonsensical meanings and tones into someone's post. Good day.

Hmmm. You see, people usually underestimate the impact of social media on a child's upbringing. The child has no father who leads the house, make rules, and provides strict guidance and discipline. The authoritative figures in the house are women and the little girl is under the cover of her single mother. If the women in the house are free-spirited and see nothing wrong in that behaviour, there is nothing you can do because you don't have greater authority over the girl than the women in her life whom she can run to for cover against your discipline.

Report her to the mother and other members of the family. If they, especially the mother, see nothing wrong or they treat the case with levity then there is nothing you can do since they have more authority over the girl than you.

I can say more, but this will be enough for this night. I wan sleep.

Go on @COOL10

emmaodet:
Hahaha

Abi.

How is your side bro? Longest time

My side fine. Things are moving well.

Good to see you are taking out time to enjoy yourself, odogwu. Man must not suffer himself to death. Extend my greetings to families.

Skepticus:
Aswear..

Very stupid set of people!!

They never disappoint in stretching the scope of their stupidity.

Don't mind them. There is one self-destructive thing common with blue pill clowns. On one hand, the clowns will tell you that women deserve equal rights and opportunities and that positions of power, authority and leadership should be open to women, but, on the other hand, they infantalise and pedestalise them and absolve them from the accountability and responsibility that come with these. They are unknowingly yielding to the feminists' gynocentric imperative.

...

ME: why can't a man hit a woman when she is physically assaulting him?
BLUE PILL FOLKS AND CLOWNS: a man is stronger. The strength difference is large.
ME: based on that logic, prime Mike Tyson shouldn't hit me if I hit him?
BLUE PILL FOLKS AND CLOWNS: erm, erm... erm... error404.

Dliquidmetal:
so according to you,anyone who doesn't ascribe to what your own religious books says is "satanic"? What ever that means
Dont be bringing your own religion things here where there are people with diverse religions or irreligeousity as the case maybe.

Stick to the redpill.

Don't mind him.


Red pill is amoral and irreligious. Religious or mythical references can only be made if they exemplify and aptly illustrate red pill points or prove informative when judging a case from a red pill lens. Integrating religion into the red pill or bringing up religious topics and ethics for their own sake are not acceptable here.

... typing


"... but men are much stronger than women." Well, is it not stupid for someone to hit and attack someone stronger than you? Why not stay off from someone stronger than you? In what sane world does a person hit or trifle with someone that's much stronger and demands that the stronger person not hit back? Thanks to simps and blue pill agents/idi0ts, this stupidity dwells amongst us and has been weaponised by females. Keeping in mind the second paragraph, if the supposed substantial strength difference is the basis upon which men shouldn't hit back, why don't these blue pill agents/idi0ts support the notion that a physically weak or average man shouldn't get hit back by a heavyweight boxer since the strength difference is large? We all know that they will be nonexistent if a weak/average man hits or slaps a heavyweight boxer and receives punches and a good beating in reprisal. They won't see the retaliation as reprehensible and unacceptable as they would have done if a female was at the receiving end. If by any chance these blue pill clowns are to mediate and resolve the issue and apportion blame in such a case, they will reprimand the weak/average man for making the decision to hit and attack the stronger man, unlike when a female is at the receiving end. They will hold the weak/average man accountable. "Substantial strength difference" goes through the window.

As you can see, "substantial strength difference" is just a thougtless pretext used to cover up this sort of pampering and double standard emanating from the pedestalisation of females. The white knight syndrome and the weakness of simping are simply at work here. SMH. 

"... but what if she collapses and die? Is it not better to walk away?" Another stupid blue pill concern. In Africa and many parts of the world, in the past and present, as many here can attest to while growing up, a lot of parents have the practice of whipping their kids with belts, slippers and other things as a way of disciplining them when they misbehave; this can be severe depending on the degree of misbehaviour and defiance. Even teachers indulge in this practice as many of us can attest to while growing up. Parents even dish out heavy slaps, conks on the head and a big smack on the backs of their kids to discipline and punish them. This is an ageless practice; even the bible says "spear the rod and spoil the child."

My point is, despite all these disciplinary actions, there were no concerns that the kids would drop dead. Why is it then a concern accorded to females when you dish them a retaliation that doesn't even surpass or come close to what parents and teachers do to kids in primary and secondary schools, especially stubborn kids? Are female bodies exceedingly fragile compared to that of kids (male and FEMALE kids)? Are they that weak? Since when did a slap or punch become so dreaded and lethal? Parents, in general, love their kids and, just like our teachers, they have no intention of killing them, yet they employ the disciplinary measures we experienced while growing up. Why then are blue pill idi0ts/clowns and agents acting like a slap or punch will most likely kill a woman?

The concern that a female who is physically assaulting you will die or collapse when you lay your hands on her is laughable in general. It is an excuse which comes from the notions and attitude discussed earlier in my write-up, which in turn is rooted in the pedestalisation of females and the white knight syndrome.

Sometimes, even some men that know they should retaliate and have claimed they would do so become toothless when the situation arises even if it is clear that they can get away with it. They succumb to this excuse and concern like the rest. You see, when men don't have the balls and frame to go the hard route by putting a woman in check and hitting her when she lays her hands on him, he tows the easy route out of cowardice: walking away and/or succumbing to indifference as she keeps hitting him. His ego won't let him concede that he lacks balls, so he hides behind the excuse to feel justified.

It is okay to defend yourself against a women that is physically assaulting you.

^{NB: this is for the sake of discussion and contribution since I am bored this evening. I have always wanted to give this take.}

fattprince:
Yeah, so the guy can die if the lady hit him. Stop excusing these girls you wouldn't hear. When a girl hit you, you must try all you can to stop it even if it means hitting her back. I heard a story of a guy always abused physically and emotionally by his spouse and the spouse always telling him to hit her if he dares. The guy just did exactly that one day even the neighbors and the spouse herself said they couldn't believe it but all in all it stops the abuse.

Tenacious stupidity is really upon us. People who support the notion that men shouldn't physically retaliate when a woman goes physical on them because of the substantial strength difference between the average man and average woman are simply thoughtless; they have simply succumbed to the same old blue pill stupidity and puerile paradigm.

These silly folks act and react as if a man's fists and blows, however slight or moderate, are, in effect, lethal weapons of mass destruction when dealt on a woman. They act like a man's body is made of steel and is strong enough to easily fend off and effortlessly withstand any level of physical attack from women. They act like a woman's body is a fragile and weak thing and her physical attacks are like falling feathers in effect... and she can't possibly do more than that. This is laughable. They believe a man should endure a woman's physical attack (no matter what) and walk away for the sake of "dignity" and "maturity" as a "real man," or for the fear of killing or maiming the woman instead of retaliating. The jokes do write themselves.

The blue pill agents and idi0ts who subscribe to these notions and attitude stripe woman of accountability as they absolve women of the burden of self-restraint and shield them from the consequences of their bad decision to hit men who are stronger than them; this is a "privilege" that even weak men, and even boys, don't have against much stronger men. They also enable a certain toxic mindset and behaviour in women: that it's no big deal, and somewhat acceptable and understandable, when a woman hits a man. The red pill will never condone these, never! These vile notion and attitude also give room to physical abuse against men in the hands of women, and the lamentable belittlement, mockery, festering and dismissal of this phenomenon... much to the detriment of men and boys. These blue pill notion and attitude inadvertently give women the monopoly on physical assault.

If a female doesn't want to get hit by a male, then she must not hit a male. If a man or women intends to go about throwing punches and dishing out slaps, he or she must be prepared to receive the same or more in retaliation, and there should no immunity from the consequences of his or her action. As the red pill dictates, women are responsible for their actions and they must be held accountable for their every decision. If a woman doesn't like a man hitting her, then the onus is on her to make the decision not to hit a man. Accountability!

typing...

RAGGA40:
To my Redpill brothers, today is my birthday, celebrate with me, may we all continue to get unplugged from the simping disorder

More success to you. Red pill forever.

Respect!

tripleking64:
Who cares?

Her ex husband is safe... It's not a competition, everyone have options, there's someone for everyone, but don't choose the worng one, don't choose the damaged one..

Some people are see this as a war between the two genders... No it's not a war... It's simple, just common sense... Just don't go for the damaged one even if she got the highest options.. go for you peace brotherly, don't go because she got lots of men on her.

She posted what the man said but she won't tell you what she's thinking about that....

The Redpill is not confraternity... The Redpill is something in you that you have to let out, your common sense... Check yourself....

The Redpill is here to remind you that there's other people using there common sense... This is why we are here... We are not at work with nobody.... Women are women... Men are men.. we all need each other but you have to play safe brotherly.... Don't give love freely, many or let me say most of them have proven their don't deserve that that love....

Pansòphist

Potiphar's wife won still nack Joseph upon all the providing and protection.. she still come spoil the connection between potiphar and Jeseph because of her feelings... This is selfishness... But she no reason am oooo... If potiphar had divorced her that time. another man will still carry her.. who cares??

Aren't you overreacting and running off on an impression DieRich5 never gave you? We really have to be careful not to ascribe unnecessary and unimplied meaning and intentions to someone's post. What about his post made you think he sees anything as a competition or war against females? Where exactly is he making out things to be a war/competition with females? What about his post implied and made you think he was portraying the red pill as a confraternity and defying common sense? Seriously?

Is it out of place or a crime to give a report and speak, from a red pill lens, about any issue on a red pill thread as long as one isn't defying the rules of the thread? All he simply did was give a report on the intention of someone to marry Amber Heard and he simply wrote "men are their own worst enemies." What he did is similar to what heartofcity12 does. What is the big deal? He is not forcing anything on anyone or asking you or anyone to care. You could have skipped his post if it offered you nothing new as far as your red pill knowledge is concerned.

His post isn't out of place and he is actually spot on (that's if you take the post for what it is). Men are usually their worst enemies... and that is true, even in this case. In this case, anyone with a scintilla of common sense and who sees things from a red pill lens knows Amber Heard's red flags are out in the open and they are serious: she has a history and pattern of abusing her partners. Before Johnny Depp, she was once arrested in 2009 for abusing her ex-girlfriend (yes, she is openly bisexual) and she has been diagnosed by reputable psychologists to have borderline personality disorder and histrionic personality disorder. She abused Johnny Depp in many obnoxious ways and taunted him without remorse that he wouldn't be believed in court (as audio recordings revealed) while lying to the public, defaming Depp, running him through the family court, and posing as an anti-domestic-violence activist and victim of domestic violence.

Even though her ex-girlfriend tried to defend Amber Heard in the case against Depp by claiming Amber didn't abuse her, covering for her and accusing the police officers of misogyny and homophobia, her claims were quickly exposed as rubbish and they clearly contradicted the records and witnesses.

DieRich5 point is simple: why would a high value man who can do better decide to genuinely commit and offer love to an lying abuser with personality disorders and all sorts of ill-mannered behaviours that are out in the open? Is it not redpilled to avoid ignoring red flags and vet properly? Is it not redpilled to avoid marrying out of pity? Any man who ignores these and sincerely offers Amber Heard commitment is a fool who is an enemy of himself... and that is fact. Many men keep ignoring red flags, and that's a reality. Nothing wrong in DieRich5's message.

It is not out of place or new if we give reports on things happening home and abroad and speak from a red pill perspective. In your post, you made some points worth considering, but still try to chill and claim down.

Sukkyy2010:
I remember when i early graduated, I was at home no job no side hustle I was a whole broke ass. I could still remember my mom attitudes towards me that time (no dignity from her side at all). Compare to now that I send her monthly allowance for up keeping then the respect I receive from her is so magnificent bro, that at times it wondered me thinking am I the daddy of the house?

Before if she will call she did call my name frankly but now the adjective she uses "Oko mi"( meaning my Husband) she's now calling me her husband.

The morale of this is that: if my mom reaction towards my financial state can be as ironic as this how much more the one called wife or girlfriend.

I beg hustle oooooooo
Olowo ni Aye mo oooooo

Good thing you made it. However, while I won't advise you to stop giving her, don't ever break your back or compromise your financial situation because of your mother. When you see people's true colours, act accordingly.

ubunja:
Maria tried her best. But only got herself banned. and she subsequently deactivated. so many enemies. but we still here.

how have you been.

I have been fine, boss.