₦airaland Forum

Calibrator:
Don't make me laugh... I am presently down with fever and body aches. Squats and Pushups after a long period of absence is a biatch.

To your question.. From my early years. I don't eat meat and you know what that means? Steady Jolliof and fish every weekend.

Got to a stage, they stopped asking me since the answer is a constant

Great! It would have been funny if you were a fufu man and they were always going through the stress of pounding fufu for the chairman. I am sure they would give thanks to jah the month you leave home or go on dry fasting.

Calibrator:
My recent narration is the bedrock of this previous experience I shared in the past.

Your papa tried. What was favourite food? Hope you didn't stress them too much by asking them pound yam all the time.

emmaodet:
You raised a very valid point bro.
Personally, I like talking and sharing from my past and present experiences but I noticed some people do dig your past posts and use it against you or as a jab at you.
Do you know how many insults have received on nairaland for saying I had side chicks and not faithful to my wife? Even from so called RedPillers?
Some said I talk too much for a married man, some said I shouldn’t be here mingling with small boys as a married man, some said for a married man, I gossip a lot and Dey do aproko/Cho Cho Cho

Have heard several things on nairaland due to being a married man, aligning with TRP and sharing my experiences.
I quoted a moniker on a thread not related to Romance and the mention I got was - How dear you quote me, you this serial cheating useless man.
I was stunned and shocked but it is well.

This is why most people are strict on maintaining their anonymity and keeping certain things private. It is good to share personal experiences for the edification of others, but keep in mind that there are people who will dig up your old posts and use what you wrote against you to score cheap points or use as a clap back to attack you when they hate you or have nothing relevant to say. I won't be surprised if detractors start using JESHAL's story against him calling him someone who dropped out because of a woman even though it has no bearing on the truthfulness of his message. People are like that.

I have no problem with people who are going deep about their simpish years, but they should have what I said in mind. It is enough for people to know that we have all simped, there is no degrading and abject level simping won't take a man, and we all were once blue pilled, and mistakes are all part of the process.

Many people are not ready to hear or see the truth. That is what I noticed even though they claim they are.

People can't get over their feelings and realise that the red pill is amoral, just as it is irreligious. People will see someone sharing details of his lifestyle that their moral compasses, ethics and religious beliefs find very reprehensible, instead of picking the red pill truth from his statements/experiences and keeping their morality to themselves, they start shutting the person and shoving their morality and religion in his face.

They act as if he as a redpiller ought to respect and abide by their moral, ethical and religious principles. They act as if him sharing his experiences means he demands others to follow his lifestyle or that he is making his lifestyle what the red pill is all about. They act as if their morality, ethics and religious principles are part of the red pill. They don't realise that they can't use what they preserve as someone's moral shortcomings to dismiss his status as a redpiller; they also don't know that morally uprightness doesn't necessarily mean one is a better redpiller. "Red pill is amoral" can never sink into their heads.

This is why people remain in the matrix and don't grow. They come wanting to see what they agree with and what makes them feel good and even massages their egos. They expect the truth to meet these expectations; this means they are closed to any truth that doesn't meet these expectations. This is why people remain in the matrix or remain at a certain basic level of red pill awareness till they die. How can one grow if he is not willing to listen to the experiences of others who live a different kind of life and have seen a different aspect of life? How can a man grow in red pill truth if he is not ready to risk being shocked, confounded and left wallowing in surprising and disagreement at what he finds and keeps it in mind that he could have been wrong all along?

This set of people can't learn, relearn and unlearn. A lot of people are not ready. Don't mind them.

djon78:
There are knowledge that pass your level

You can't really understand

You are still a kid
You don't even have a clue

Have you heard the saying a leopard can't change its spot

There are level of upbringing people like you were never opportuned

Be worried for yourself

Even if you ever get married
Your type will be given a bastard

Of which I have passed that level

In case you don't know, the vermin is a troll and detractor. It is always up to no good. We have all agreed to ignore it.

It will blow hot and try to plant seeds of discord and elicit a response, but when it is ignored, it will take a rest when it is tired or dead.

Good evening, sir.

Polynek:
Mr Capslock you are making sense by urging guys to drop there experience here.
But guess what, do you know one of the major reasons guys don't do dat?
Many guys here including you are easy to criticize someone, many call there fellow guys here simp and other derogatory names, I was a victim of dat, wen I said something about my GF, only one guy gave me words of encouragement. Others were busy calling me all sorts of names.
This thread is full of knowledge no doubt, I always come here b4 sleeping to read and learn 1 or 2, but something is missing, and what is that? ENCOURAGEMENT
many of us here don't see there selves as students, many blvs that we are all masters of the game, and Dix type of mindset discourages others to share there ugly experience bcox many will bash Him, so to avoid any kind of insult, guys here don't share dea ugly experience bcox we don't encourage rather we are quick to call someone a simp.
The only experience you will see here is the positive one's or the one in progress, nobody can post his mistake here bcox He knows dat He will regret bringing such issue, even as am typing Dix words here, some will still call me names without criticizing constructively.
So Mr Capslock don't expect guys to share d experience here except d positive one's, that is the bitter Truth.
One love
I come in peace

Polynek:
Thank you for acknowledging that what i said is true.
Am a working student, I blv we all know how student environment looks like, I stay in midst of women everyday of my life, both in d working place and in d lecture Hall, I hv encountered many tinx via woman, but if I start Sharing it here, a lot of people will call me names, so I hv to keep my experience to my self, bcox d only time I tried to do dat here I regreted it, bcox they treated me like a troll including you, Martinez and Mr Luminous, I can't remember others tho.
We hv to change our mindset and see ourselves as students so dat we can encourage others dat made mistake, instead of seeing ourselves as masters of the game.
Good morning Bro and hv a nice day.
One love
I come peace.

You are a silly liar. Do you really think no one here remembers past events? I remember the event you are talking of, but you are twisting things and lying. You weren't a newbie at the time you asked about an issue with your girlfriend, and we were very familiar with you since you hung around for a long time. Your question was a very silly one and the answer should have been obvious given that you were not a new presence at the time.

Despite your silly question, redpillers simply asked you if you have read the thread from start to finish, and some concluded you were trolling given the question you asked and the fact that it had trashed severally and you were expected to know what's up. You picked serious offence and accused them of being harsh and insultive. The only guy who was lenient with you to explain things was accused by you of calling you a simp when he simply said that he had done worse than you during his simpish days. Mind you no one called you a simp. Rather than listen to him and others, you kept raising your shoulders claiming that you were redpiller who is sharp and make moves in the relationship.

You kept saying nonsense, acting unreasonably and refusing to take advice. It was then redpillers really concluded you were not a serious person. No one took you seriously at first when you tabled your girlfriend issue. This wasn't just because of your silly question, but because, before your girl friend issue, you were the very same person who had played silly games, taken us round circles and spoken unreasonably during the discussion about marriage and old age, remember?

==================
To see the kind of guy Polynèk is, first look at the discussion about marriage and old age which started HERE at page 1122 and ended around HERE (you can still read further to get few reactions).

After this came his silly question and subsequent silly responses about his girlfriend issue. This started HERE and ended in page 1157 (you can still read further to get few reactions).
==========

Some people are not just serious human beings. SMH.

Kiñgsince95:
Everything you said is true...

I've been a guest on nairaland since 2014.

The truth is most guys her, only post their success stories to make others feel they are gods when it comes to female psychology... Nobody is an island of knowledge.
We all have flaws and loopholes.

'Your mistakes don't make you less of a man'
Always remember that... Thanks.

You and Polynek should stop twisting things.

You both and others who think like you should note the following and let them sink in well:

(1) This thread posts red pill its purest form and no one is obliged to share his personal experiences. Despite this, people have shared personal stuffs over the course of this thread of their own accord. Besides, how do you know for certain that the personal tales you read are factual? Factual personal experiences help, but the best thing is to take what you see here and put it in practice and see things for yourself.

(2) Nobody tries to look like a master of game here. Infact, there is no hierarchy or king and followers here. Everyone here who abides by the red pill is a redpiller at different stages of their red pill growth, and we all come here to compare notes and help eac other. This has been said repeatedly here. Stop the nonsense. We have acknowledged in the past that the red pill is an endless journey, one should keep learning and that no one knows it all, yet you saying we are acting like masters of game.

(3) We don't bash people, even redpillers, when they claim they've simped or fallout short of the red pill. We redpillers have always said that no one is infallible and mistakes are bound to happen, and these mistakes are part of the growth process. When people here claim they've simped or gone amiss, we are fond of replying with "go and simp no more." We even have a saying that "all have simped and fallen short of the glory of masculinity/red pill." We also hold that there is no one that hasn't simped or wasn't blue-pilled. So what's your point?

(4) however, if you are not new here and/or we know you to have exhibited good red pill awareness and you make a basic mistake that you ought to grown beyond or you keep repeating them, we will scold you for you to sit up, not to bash you or feel superior to you. If you get in your feelings and misconstrue that as bashing and hostility, sorry for you. There is a place for tough love and the fact that redpillers are not infallible doesn't mean there are certain mistakes you shouldn't leave behind. Is you are not new here and you keep asking silly basic questions that have been trashed repeatedly here, we will look you in a certain kind of way and ask if you have read this thread from beginning. Due diligence is important.

(5) sometimes, on rear occasions, people do crazy simpish stuffs and they present their stories. When we hold a mirror to their faces and tell them they are simps and blue pill men who need to change their (stupid) ways, they take offence especially because their egos can't stomach it. They expect us to be soft and cuddling... grown men for that matter. If the simple truth is too harsh, let them come back when they are ready. If we cuddle you and pamper you into taking the red pill, we will have pamper and cuddle you to remain and you won't go far since you don't have skin for harsh and bitter truths.

(6) this thread and redpillers have never been against sharing personal experiences. You don't see too much personal experiences because it is not what the thread is mainly about. The only people who usually stop people from sharing their experiences are the moral and ethical champions and the sanctimonious religious fanatics. Herbsworks was a victim of these silly, ignorant folks; redpillers wanted Herbsworks to continue sharing. We can also see something similar in the case of XshegzzyeeiX.

SMH.

XshegzzyeeiX:
Redpill is amoral, but them no wan hear that one.

Blockheads

Don't mind them. Due diligence is very hard for some people. The amorality of the red pill has been exhaustively discussed here before, but some people want to take us backwards and/or play silly games.

Some can't keep their feelings in check, they don't understand that when in a red pill space, they are to keep their morality, ethics and religion to themselves. They want to bend the nature and essence of the red pill to suit their morality, ethics and religion; they want to integrate these things into the red pill and feel good about themselves. Smh. Red pill will always be the red pill, and there is nothing anyone can do about that. It is not where you come to feel good about yourself and play the decency card for whatever reason.

The red pill is irreligious and, as a result, we have redpillers from different religion and even irreligious position (eg. atheism, agnosticism, etc.). In the same way, the red pill is amoral and we have redpillers of different moral compasses and ethics. Because someone's lifestyle doesn't go down well with your morality or ethic doesn't give you the grounds to make an issue out of it; keep your morality and ethics to yourself.

joviegghead:
Typical Ding.

Starts poorly, and starts winning or doing well later.
Very sad. Cuz I like him and he's probably the only person, apart from Fabi, who can trouble Carlsen.

True. That's Ding Liren's pattern. Anyway, Nakamura and Nepomniachtchi just played a quick draw; Ding Liren just suffered a shocking loss to Radjabov; and Caruana-Rapport and Duda-Firouzja games are still ongoing.

Firouzja missed a clear opportunity to fork Duda's queen and knight. His blunder has shifted things in Duda's favour. The candidates isn’t Firouzja's tournament. I expected a bit more from him though.

The moral champions and ethical folks who like to do the "right thing" have risen again. Due diligence seems to be hard. Gosh! Ignore females and those taking us backwards.

I want to say something, but later. Smh.

Caruana lost again, against Ding Liren this time. This makes it three loses in four games for him. From closely chasing Nepomniachtchi to slipping to fourth place.

Nepomniachtchi is playing like a champion at this point and I don't see anyone rubbing his shoulders if he continues like this. Ding Liren and Nakamura have rises from the dead.

Adasun:
but they both perform the same function right?

They perform the same function, but the division sign is not a grouping symbol.

ProphetJeroboam:
Some men can’t be reasoned with.

He is much welcome. Female nature also won't give a fùck when it mercilessly and remorselessly sinks its claws into him. We dey wait.

@Diligentnigga

Reach me at ventodiablo@gmail.com. Drop your contact in the mail and I will reach you through WhatsApp with evidence of my identity.

Itimkpataka:
Should I start this thread from page one or should I follow along.??

Do start from page one, it is better. You might not finish it at a go, but you can use 15 - 30 minutes per day to study and catch up. If you are free during the weekends, you can study more. With time, you will catch up. Others have done it. You can also comment and ask questions.

This is my humble suggestion.

Trex4:
The hype don enter him head. Redpill content that Cave adullam dey give here for free. 200$ for session Even masters on YouTube don't charge that much.

Well, if he wants to charge, he is free to do so at any amount as long as he isn't forcing anyone to patronise him. No one is obliged to release free content. Good luck finding customers when there are free contents online and tons of video on YouTube to exhaust. $200 per 30 minutes ke, for this con3?

sabbiboi:
@CaveAdullam @Martinez @Ubunja and other great teachers here, you all have made contributions that have expand my well of knowledge.
I salute you boss! The game is the game in the outside world, and you need to be smart to play it and be a champion.

I suggest you take this to the next level. Twitter will be a home to sell your knowledge to the world, it’s fast growing.
You can even grow better if you direct a link here so people can visit this place more, at the same time you can use the influence of Nairaland to grow your account.

I have thought about that, but I am not interested in it for certain reasons. I am cool with sharing stuffs for free.

ubunja:
okay ,, for the benefit of those on this thread who still think The true alpha man is not a king of women, he is a king in his fields ,,,,  I'll break it down AGAIN for the 100th time:

There's Alpha...... There's Beta.

What is a Beta?
A Beta is a man who is failing with women whom women deal with only as a second option and use him for his resources.

Okay.

What is an Alpha then?
If Beta is failing with WOMEN how then does Alpha magically become winning in "fields"?

It doesn't even make sense.

If a Beta is failing with women then its common sense that an Alpha will be his opposite.... Someone WINNING WITH WOMEN.

If a Beta is a Beta cause of negative female experience then an Alpha is an Alpha cause of positive female experience.

Its a simple thing I don't understand why people are still struggling to get this.

If a Beta was a Beta because of life failures then an Alpha would be an Alpha because of life successes.
But that's not what it's about. Don't you see? C'mon.

People will do well to their due diligence on what the red pill is all about and acquaint themselves with this space and the terms used here if they have made up their minds to pitch their tents here. Lack of due diligence leads to facetious statements and points, and it painfully causes painful repetitions of basic stuffs by redpillers to correct ignorant and off point talk. Due diligence would have eliminated this and it's an eyesore when this happens.

People who take time (as they wisely scheduled) to painstakingly read this thread from the first page instead of succumbing to the urge to comment and spread their wings don't have two heads. GOSH!

Will Smith is a king in his field. He has maximised his potential and amassed a fortune, yet he is a beta and simp as far the red pill is concerned. What does that tell one about who the alpha is as far as the red pill is concerned? (Remember, this thread is "strictly redpill" What does that tell one about the bearing wealth and success have on determining who is beta or alpha? There are other men, even famous ones, who are successful and are kings in their fields, but are betas and simps as far as the red pill is concerned.

Wealth and success don't stop one from being simp and beta, and they alone don't make one an alpha as far as the red pill is concerned.

The word "alpha" is indeed a contextual term generally. The man who is an alpha in the business world or academic world is not necessarily an alpha in other areas, even as far as the red pill is concerned. People must understand that this is a red pill thread and they must understand what terms (eg beta, alpha, simp) mean in light of the red pill. What the word "alpha" means in the business world is different from what it means in the red pill. In the chess world, the alpha males are the top grandmasters, and the alpha among them is the world champion. The world champion can be a beta and simp as far as the red pill is concerned.

Being a red pill alpha doesn't mean you shouldn't be an alpha in other areas; no redpiller said one shouldn't. Telling people what the red pill alpha is doesn't mean that is all one must be. We even champion the idea that one should put himself first and make money. People should let the red pill be the red pill. People should stop acting like the red pill is an all-encompassing manual that teaches you how to be the ideal man in all aspects of life and it dictates your behaviour in all these aspects. As one is learning the red pill, one must also try to learn other things because the red pill doesn't teach everything or concerns itself with every thing. Red pill doesn't cover all aspects of life. Red pill spaces are not where you try to sound worthy and feel good about yourself. Learn!

Even you Ubunja and others have explained this several times (I brought two links out of many and one picture below). People should let the red pill be the red pill.

https://www.nairaland.com/6048178/reality-every-guy-need-know/1248#110516968

https://www.nairaland.com/6048178/reality-every-guy-need-know/1242#110474155

... typing

Learning the red pill, changing and adapting in this way is what Ubunja referred to as "giving women what they want." It like saying "why waste time trying to make a human eat poison of his own accord when you can give him a delicious meal if your goal is to make the human eat something?" A delicious meal works to achieve your goal and you are giving the human what it wants. This doesn't mean you must go above and beyond to your own detriment or sabotage yourself to please the human or make the human's mindless zombie. The same applies to Ubunja's post about getting sexual success from women. Red pill will never tell you to sabotage yourself or do things to your own detriment because you want women (eg cutting off your limbs, going into debt or getting obese and unmotivated etc); that is simping and simping fails big time. Red pill is against self-sabotage and simping.

Given that the red pill and we redpillers spoke against poverty some time back and always said they we must put ourselves first and be the best versions by improving, being a lowlife or putting yourself behind bars (losing your freedom) is never our goal. Even Ubunja wrote that money can be used to improve your red pill experience by investing in yourself. Men can know the red pill and choose not to play the game or play at a certain level, but men who choose to play to the fullest are not doing anything amiss. Note that playing to the fullest doesn't mean you make your life is all about sex, pleasing women and not having a successful life. Ubunja's post is for those who want to play the game. He never said everyone must play; it is optional.

Finally, just as the things women do to get a man's attention for commitment is shaped to a good extent by how the man the thinks and what he desires, the things men will do to get good sexual success like players are shaped to a good extent by women's psyche and natural desires and predisposition (female nature). What a shepherd who desires to feeds his sheep gives his sheep is dependent on the sheep's nature and feeding pattern; he must adapt to give it grass, not meat. If give it meat won't lead him to his desired goal, he must learn how the sheep feed and adapt. These doesn't mean he must be willing sabotage himself to feed the sheep or be a zombie to the sheep's desires. If female nature becomes different from what we know now, the game will change.

cc Kipaji

Kipaji:
If being with women implies becoming a delinquent I'd prefer going sexless. I'm not going to change my core self, my inner principles just because of sex. Someone in this forum said that his dad told him that men's problems began when they shifted their attention from God/nature/spirituality/values/ to women and most people here agreed. If playing the game implies abandoning my authenticity and originality, I'd prefer to withdraw from the game. No, I will not try to simulate players. No, I will not try to be thuggish. No, I will not try to talk a certain way that isn't my natural way of talking. No I will not compromise myself to get sex. No, I will not give up my inner authentic self to appeal to women. Sex is not that worth it.

That said, it doesn't mean that I am not adapting to female nature. There are some things we can learn from players and implement in our life. But it should always be in a way that protects our inner self. I am not becoming a slave to women's twisted mind. Does that mean I'll be sexless? So be it.

Your post is good, but you failed to grasp what Ubunja was trying to say and you didn't even consider the post he was replying to in order to fully get the context and message. Read both posts fully and you will grasp what he is saying. Nevertheless, I will still explain.

It has long been known and observed by men that females, both good/decent and bad girls, despite saying otherwise, find bad boys/players alluring and attractive and they fall for them in ways that they wouldn't for the nice, romantic and understanding guys. Bad boys/players get great sexual results while the other kind of guys seem to keep getting played, shortchanged and getting poor sexual results. Men wondered what it was about these bad boys/players that made them attractive and pùssy magnets; what were the characteristics that worked in their favour and can they be adopted? It was later observed that the following characteristics (few of which I will list) helped:

((A)) they don't pedestalise women and treat any of them as special. They give any woman special consideration/treatment. They don't simp.
((B)) they don't commit, develop emotional attachments or do love, they keep things cold and emotionless, (it also helps that women are attracted to men that don't fall for them and whose hearts are difficult to capture).
((C)) in Nigerian vernacular, bad boys/players no send any female. Females like men wey no send them and treat them like they don't matter one bit... no matter what these women do.
((D)) they are not pushovers, they are assertive, they are firm in their boundaries and are always ready to dump the women they are dealing with and walk away. Also, they have the abundance mindset.
((E)) they have social proof and are known to be sexually experienced which is what women find attractive.
((F)) when it comes to sex, they are non-judgemental and don't have the classification, which I discussed earlier, that the conventional average man has when it comes to sex. They attach no morality or ethics to sex, they open to many things and are notorious for their anomie when it comes to sex. This is why they are the ones that usually get to see the inner hòe and sex freaks with the women they are dealing; these women have no problem opening up to them and trying many things.
((G)) thanks to their lifestyle, experiences and association with one another, they understand game to a good extent. The more they live their lives and continue their ways, their knowledge of game and insights keep piling up... to their advantage.

These are just few of the qualities that worked in their favour. Men who adopted some of these qualities and adapted when dealing with new women saw they obtained good results, similar to what bad boys/players obtained. Adopting these qualities doesn't mean that you become a lowlife, delinquent or a thug like many of these players/bad boys (Ubunja never said this); adopting these qualities doesn't mean you have to imbibe all aspects of their lives. It will suffice to just know what works and what doesn't. As redpillers know and have always said, you can be wealthy and career-oriented and adopt these qualities to get great results; when you do this, you become A PLAYER/BAD BOY IN YOUR OWN RIGHT. There are well-to-do men who aren't delinquents, thugs or criminals, but they are players/bad boys in their own right.

So Ubunja's point is that there is no need playing by the bluepill handbook or trying make women be what they are not when one can adapt to get the sexual success that one wants. What is the point of the average man trying to make female nature and mating strategies make sense and be in harmony with straightforward logic when he can learn the red pill, change and adapt to get great sexual success? Why waste his time squaring the circle? If doing the "right", nice and "responsible" thing as society and religion dictate hinders you from getting good sexual results, there is absolutely nothing wrong in eliminating these and adapting to get good results (this is not simping). It doesn't mean you and other men who adapt like this don't have minds of their own or don't have authentic inner selves. Even in other aspects of life, people change, evolve, transform, and adapt to be better or get what the results they want; it doesn't mean they don't have a mind of their own or authentic self... it is just life.

... typing

Kipaji:
This makes me understand Martinez's points better. Thanks.

Glad you finally  understood.

Men, due to upbringing, think certain sex styles/kinks/sex acts are for hòes/bad and spoilt chicks while good and decent girls greatly limit themselves to certain simple and mundane ones. For women, both the good and bad girls, this classification doesn't exist; it is either they enjoy it or not. If they enjoy it and can physically take it, then they have no problem doing it.

The acts, kinks and styles that men for whatever reasons see as extreme, depraved, reprobate, perverted, ungodly and as the stuff of hòes, spoilt chicks & bad chick/slay queens are not seen in the same way by women. If they enjoy it and can physically take it, doing it is just like drinking water from a tap and having harmless fun. This is one of the reasons why some acts men think are uncommon are actually common. This only thing that will stop a woman is if she is not just into it (ie. doesn't enjoy it). Men who don't know this are in for a rude awakening and likely won't get the sexual best from the women they are dealing with.

Women know most men think like this so they pretend and play along to build and preserve their angelic, chaste, moral and prudish reputation and veneer in the eyes of these men. This is very understandable since this is one of the ways men judge women and pick them for commitment. If you are judgemental and operating under the mindset of your upbringing towards a particular girl, you will have a hard time seeing the inner hòe and sex freak beast in her as she will try maintain her righteous image. Guys who do the opposite see a different result. Reputation is important to women in the dating market.

To make things worse, the way you start with her is the way you end with her. If you started the conventional way with the sexual classification I highlighted earlier and you married her thinking she is chaste and angelic and not a bad chick sexually and she played the part with you, you will find it hard to unleash her inner hòe and sex freak beast. This is because if she does bring out the inner hoè, it will cause problems in your relationship and your conventional mind because you will ask and tell yourself "I never knew she was capable of this hoè stuff or into this. Where did she learn it from? Has she always been like this? Do I really know her? This is why wives and girlfriends who started this way monotonously stick to the mundane and simple styles for life with the men they are committed to... they won't go further. Besides, most the time, their husbands are not their sexual choices.

If a your wife or girl friend is acting holy and prude, telling you "I can't suck d!ck, that's disgusting", "I don't do doggy, that's for hòes", "I can't do this, it is too degrading" etc, just have it at the back of your mind that you are being shortchanged and you are not among the guys who can get her sexual best; if you insist on getting it you will meet resistance because she will want to defend her image (women do this a lot). Besides, what a woman isn't getting from you sexually, she will seek it elsewhere from the right guy if the opportunity (which I once discussed) presents itself. If she can have the best of both worlds without any consequences, she will. All women are sexual freaks to the right guy in the right situation. Don't bother with those that are not sex freaks to you.

Najdorf:
Do you have a lichess/chess.com handle sir?

No, sir.

Fabiano Caruana has lost twice in his last three games; too bad he couldn't capitalise. Ding Liren finally picked up his first win. Finally, Nakamura is catching up, but he could have better in his previous game against Radjabov.

Standings in the 2022 Fide Candidates Tournament.

Adasun:
in your calculation, u started with 2 +1 inside the brackets, but they is also division which fall under grouping symbols as u said.


my question is, if they are more than one grouping symbol,how do you know which to begin with.


in the first example,if I start by dividing 6 by 2 before attacking the brackets, is it a wrong move?

The division sign ÷ is not a grouping symbol. The fraction bar which separates the numerator and the denominator in a fraction is a grouping symbol.

Eleven thousand naira.

Adasun:
when u said"working from the inside out" do u mean from right to left?


Martiñez39s

Nope. It means evaluating the expressions confined by the innermost grouping symbols first. After that is done, keep repeating until you clear all the grouping symbols. Do you understand or should I exemplify my point with examples?

Adasun:
on step one,they are two grouping symbols- the bracket and the division.

how do u know Which to start with?

Quote the post you are referring to.

....

It will go on its own. To help further, take vitamin C and always brush your mouth frequently, especially before your sleep; don't let the sugar, onions and other yamayama to linger and "rot" harsly in your mouth through the night while asleep.

@Heartofcity12

Cheasystickylov:
Thank you so much for reaching out. I have since emailed you.

I have reached out to you on WhatsApp.

Meedon:
House, can a man change a hoe? There is this girl in my area that everyone is sleeping with. My friend came visiting and saw this girl. He started to disturb me, always talking of how he loves the girl and that he want to marry her. I told him exactly what he needs to hear. I told him that this girl you are trying to commit to is a hoe. He said it doesn't matter that he would change her. That he would stop her from going to other men. He said that after he has changed her, he would marry her. He really loved this girl. Maybe it is because of the big ass, I don't know.

Premium tears and massive Ls loading for the clown.