Martinez39s's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Martinez39s's Profile › Martinez39s's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 238 pages)
crazygod:Lol. Like they did against LFC at Wanda Metropolitano in 2020. |
I am not impressed with Atletico so far this season. In as much as I hope Atletico gets the three points, I don't see Liverpool losing this. But then, it was like this before the 2020 fixture; I hope I see a repeat of that fixture. ![]() |
luminouz: ![]() |
Mandela27:See a doctor. By the way, why do guys fuçk raw? Do you not care about HIV and other STDs from these promiscuous slùts? Do you know for sure where the pùssy has been? Be careful. |
Regex: ![]() |
PrinxArthur1:Sure, this is obviously true. The main thing is if one joined for the right reasons and is undertaking his red pill journey the right way. Secondly, Ego is evolutionary part of human way of life, how you control it determines how far you have been able to apply macheavalian principles/red pill [/b]Ego and other emotions and inclinations are part of the human way of life, I never stated otherwise. Nevertheless, we know and agree that we have to be logical and not emotional. Ego is an emotion, and, as such, must give way logic. As an emotion, it can be manipulated by others to your detriment and it can make you emotional and blind to sound reasoning, criticism and corrections, especially when they pique the ego. Ego, especially when piqued or challenged, makes it difficult for people to admit or recognise their wrongs. In short, it is possible to value yourself, have self-respect, be logical and rational, make right decisions etc without involving your ego or being a slave to it. |
CaveAdullam:Lori iro. I am but a chronic masturbator and porn addict as well, always coming here to form monk mode (or I other words, red pill monk). I also know the names of all the porn stars. I am a soft nerd and introvert who wasn't brought up in the streets like some OG, so I will pass. ![]() However, I believe Skep*icu* or MJB*LT might .... you know... be the right mate for that damaged good. Everyone has a past and old things are past away. ![]() #Sarcasm |
Skepticus:Some people join the red pill and digest its content because of ego since they know subconsciously that it is the real deal; they just want the validation that they are smart, sharp and rugged with women and they aren't suçkers for any woman. How you know these people is that you see them making simple and big mistakes that redpillers shouldn't make, and they can't take correction. They probably saw it trending online or among friends and they decided to fit in. Some know the red pill, but are still slaves to their ego. Ego makes you stubborn when you are wrong, especially in the face of harsh corrections and criticism that hurts the ego. Ego is an emotion, not logic. If care is not taken, some move further in the wrong direction because of the stubbornness of ego, especially to the prove, when the ego is hurt, the stupid point that they are right and/or don't care. Some join the redpill because of herd-mentality, especially when it is trending amongst friends and they want to show that they belong. Some were thirsting after pùssy and were looking for a secret formula to "unlock" pùssies for themselves, so they stumbled on the red pill. Once there learnt certain things about female nature and game and started getting laid, they didn't bother to refine and upgrade their red pill knowledge and keep learning more. These people still simp one way or the other, especially when they get the "pussy/girl of their dreams" and are in committed relationships. Their red pill knowledge is in pieces and they don't even see the big picture. I believe the guy mainly belongs to the category of the first paragraph. Usually, most people are yet to internalize the red pill. Some who are broke (or not that financially buoyant) and haven't gotten certain calibre of women they want will go back to their simping ways when money start pouring in; I have said this here before. ![]() |
Akinbahm:They argue that a virgin girl is only for a virgin guy, but ask them if a broke girl is only for a broke dude and they will start frowning. ![]() |
CAPSLOCKED: ![]() |
typing... https://www.nairaland.com/6048178/reality-every-guy-need-know/860#106815743 – This is a continuation from my last post in the link above.– People must note the following: (1) [Traditional man]+ [Traditional woman] + [Traditional society] = [A strong traditional home]. (2) [Traditional man] + [Traditional woman] + [Modern society] = [A weak traditional home that is bound to change due to the wife acquainting herself with the trends and norms of society. Women are social creatures. The woman will later tend to resist most of traditional principles, even though she agreed to them before the marriage. Female nature is universal. Modern society and its norms provide her a safety net to pull her bait and switch. The man's traditional lifestyle begins and ends in his home. If it is a gynocentric society of the west, the wife's bait and switch will utilise the marital laws and domestic violence laws of society to cuff his balls.] (3) [Traditional man] + [Modern woman] + [Modern society] = [No traditional household. A clash waiting to happen if one doesn't compromise. The women might have played the chameleon to get the man, only to pull the bait and switch when the time is right.] As you can see, in living the traditional and patriarchal lifestyle, the condition of society is very important. It's the same reason one can live the traditional and patriarchal lifestyle easily in Afghanistan, but will find it difficult in the US. Your shouldn't trust your wife to follow through with her promises before marriage. Before considering marriage, men must consider the society (and it's norm) where they plan to settle down in; it is very important. If possible, men should fix the laws, social situations and norm that will challenge and impede the traditional and patriarchal lifestyle they want to live... before considering serious relationships. If possible, move to societies that have your lifestyle as its norm before settling down. Finally, it should be observed that the traditional lifestyle that most people want to live are cherrypicked traditional lifestyle: (•) you can't eliminate virginity from your marriage requirement and claim you are going traditional. (•) you can't marry a post-wall woman and claim you are going traditional. (•) if your wife doesn't have your surname and/or your children are bearing hyphenated surnames, you are not living the traditional lifestyle. It's even a sign that your wife is not walking in your frame. (•) if it is not clear that you are the head of the family, you family life is not traditional. Same with if the gender roles are not made clear and maintained. (•) others can add their own. I am belittling anyone that isn't traditional in the way they run their family. Times are different. Cc. JESHAL I will continue my write-up on marriage and masculine frame later or on another weekend. I am busy now. |
emmaodet:I really like the way you think. Also, when a man thinks a woman was there for him, he needs to ask the following: (a) How do I know that she was not sampling other options as well, while keeping me around to know who will be her best financial option as a certain period elapsed? (b) Did she not stick around because I showed some sort of huge promise that would benefit her in a relationship with me? (c) Was I in the picture because a higher bidder didn't come along? (d) While waiting and "struggling" with me during my hard time, was she not riding other diçks? When men start asking themselves these questions, many won't be in a rush to assume things. Men must learn to spot calcuculative moves from females. |
^^^^^ Mate guarding is no way near strong as it was. It is no longer a social norm. Society doesn't help if you try to practice it; it is now solely your cross, and you are not far from being labelled as "controlling" or "misogynistic" if you try. Besides, ideas like "you don't own your wife", "your wife is not your slave", and other feminist ideas are in vogue. ![]() |
JESHAL:As for finding the right virgin, you will still go through the process of trying to vet. As I have said, vetting is good, but it can't do much before a cunning woman, especially when it comes to revealing things that she hides from you. Vetting works 100% if only you can read minds and foresee the future. We cannot tell what she will be in future. Nevertheless, Ubunja did create a thread on why it is better to marry a virgin; I can't locate the thread at the moment. Young virgins are just the least of all "evils" in the pool. A woman is still a woman. Also, with the influence from society, we cannot tell how what you virgin wife will turn to. Usually, they will regret not exploring their hoè-phase and try to catch up. Related to this issue, here are posts I wrote in 2020 concerning the misconceptions about virgins; I wrote this is the ashewo thread when I went to help a certain Doñaldduke10 who brutally played by a girl he had disvirgined. A guy was telling me that he thought virgins would be loyal and bond with you since your diçk deflowered her. ![]() Martinez39s: Martinez39s:Despite marrying virgins, our ancestors knew why they still had mate guarding systems in place and didn't give their wives a break. Ponder on this. |
JESHAL:I am ready. I was attending to a guest who gave me an impromptu visit. ================= JESHAL:Well, I have always supported that men need to up their standards. I support the idea that female virginity should be a standard for marriage. A young virgin is the least of all "evils" and most reasonable pick, though female nature still persists. Nothing, not even religion, should make anyone settle for less. The basic issue with living the traditional and patriarchal lifestyle today is that times are now different. The social norms and social situations are now different. The social pillars, era and norms that enabled the traditional lifestyle are virtually nonexistent. These pillars are: (a) the acceptance of automatic male leadership and lordship in the home. Society and it's norms now frown upon such and label it misogyny. Even when a woman says she wants a man to lead, it's usually because she is trying to give out a false nawalt signal to hook unsuspecting men into commitment. One thing women who say they want you to lead cunningly omit is that the leadership must align with what they think and it should be under their supervision (you see the game here). (b) the submission and cooperation of the female to male. We know how society views this now; "equal partnership" is now encouraged. Women today usually frown on the idea of submission. Women today saying that they will submit is usually a facade before marriage. (c) the mandatory requirement of virginity before marriage. Simps and women have thrown this to the dust. Being a slut and nonvirgin is not much of a shameful thing today. (d) the automatic ownership of the children and wife by the husband. Even during divorce, the children used to belong to the man and hence full custody to the man. Thanks to the Tender Years Doctrine and feminism, which all had a global impact with time, the reverse is now the case. The laws today don't follow this traditional view. Also, as the husband, you owned your wife's body and she had better not weaponize or deny you sex... it's different now. These things and other practices were accepted by society back in the days. The man had all the leverage in the home and the women were dependent on the men; men simply had a lot of factors working for them that enabled the patriarch lifestyle. Besides, even if you embrace these ideas, you will still need a traditional woman to make a traditional home. We don't have traditional women today, what we have at best are chameleons. The absence of the old social norms, and the way woman are today, means that your traditional lifestyle starts and ends in your home. The woman might camouflage before committment and once you get married and kids start pouring in, she might start pulling some bait and switch, leaving only you in your traditional mindset. When that happens, it becomes difficult for many men since the women, laws and society (and its norms, pillars and court of public opinion) are against you and do not buy your lifestyle. No man is bigger than his society. Even the churches and many religious institutions are now modernised. Even if she was young, sheltered and raise in a traditional setting when you married her, who is to say that her exposure to social media, what is going on, and influences from friends (also, peer pressure) won't give room and arsenal for her female nature to run amok? With time, women change. The Fear Of Missing Out and the willingness of jumping of social trends are common with women. In many instances, there are cases of grown-up women regretting not exploring their hoè-phase enough. Even your children, especially your daughters, will likely buy into the ways of the modern times no matter how traditional you try to raise them. Social media, school, friends, TV, etc are all there to keep them abreast of what is going; the internet is becoming indispensable in this age. Even if you cut social media and some of these things from them, who can say that children won't find a way to do certain things behind your back? You won't be following them 24/7. Peer pressure is also another thing. In as much as people hate to admit, society also contributes in raising your children. Times are different. typing... |
People easily forget that the Ballon D'or isn't a team award or an award for the trophies you won with your team. Ballon D'or is an individual award. |
@JESHAL I am working on your last post. I will come with an answer this night or tomorrow morning. I have a lot to say in one post. Typing too much has drained time. There is something I need to attend to, offline. See you later. |
@my last post The best way to go about this would be to have structures in place that will ensure that access and custody to your kids isn't determined or majorly controlled by your wife in case of separation. But, this is hard for most men, even in Africa. Society, most men included, subconsciously buy into the idea that children "belong" to the mother and men usually try to negotiate and plead with their bitter spouses to calm down and let them see the kids. Las Las, even if you are allowed mandatory visitation at certain times (maybe you went to court or whatever), the woman still spends more time than you with the kids and hence can run her game on their minds. By the way, we men usually spend most time working to stack bread for the kids and family and someone has to take care of the kids. The mother usually does that, except you have other ideas like employing a nanny. The kids will be used as leverage during a dispute by a woman if she can do so. Usually, women have shown that they can place their petty disputes, vindictiveness and games above their children, unlike fathers, so the man's hands are tied by his compassion, maturity and consideration for the kids' sake. https://www.nairaland.com/5396187/children-deadbeat-fathers-time-think#81881574 |
Martinez39s:@JESHAL Another thing that is important to note is that during such clashes and chaos, the man hands are tied in the sense that he doesn't want a broken home for his kids with a wife that doesn't have him in his good books. Walking away has consequences he doesn't want. Men usually want their kids to have the so-called benefits of a healthy two-parent household. Hence, compromise is the way because the woman will remain stubborn no matter what, even if it all burns to the ground. During a clash which threatens the peace of the house (and hence implies separation if it lingers), one problem for men is usually who has major or full custody of the kids during separation. In many cases, it's usually the woman, and many people see women as the primary caretakers of the children and the most caring and compassionate parent (People even quip that children "belong" to the mother; we know children are usually close to their mother and they usually take the mother's side). Believe me, in such cases, it is not beneath a woman to engineer parental alienation against you and gradually poison the kids' minds against you with all sorts of malicious lies and half-truths. Women usually do this when they have a bitter dispute or disagreement with their spouse. Why? Your kids are also a leverage, big leverage, she can wield against you in order to control you or get back at you by manipulating your love for them (Women usually manipulate your emotions). Also, the woman will usually go around spreading false information about the man to others that care to listen. Men want to be involved in their children's lives. Such game isn't beneath a woman. You can't bank on your woman to be different because you never know. Even in a setting where the father is still married, he spends much time at work to cater for the family and the woman spends much time with the children, there is ample room for the woman to mold her relationship and bond with the children as she wishes in anyway possible. Women prefer the children to be closer to them than their fathers and to see them as the more loving parent; it is good for security and leverage situation. You never know the picture your wife is painting about you to your kids behind your back. |
JESHAL:The śhit tests, nagging and game from a woman never stop. Keeping frame in marriage isn't an easy thing; it can be tiring and very stressful. Mind you, women are very stubborn and do not concede easily in their game, especially when they have the leverage. Trying to match her craze for craze, and game for game, can cause chaos and disruptive clashes in the home. Most men don't want their kids growing up in such circumstances. |
Smartb0y:The thing is, we men can try our best in vetting, but harsh truth is that we can never tell the true personality of a woman... you just can never know except what she chooses to show you. Women have their game too, they actually know what men are looking for in committed relationships and they are very good at playing the long game where necessary. Some women are very smart and good at their game that they will pass all sorts of vetting with flying colours. Nevertheless, I agree with you that it is important to test a woman's aggression. Her temper and anger are important to test. Also, her feminist disposition are important to test. If possible, test these things. Just note that the chameleon nature of women can hide a lot about her personality that your vetting won't reveal. |
EbukaHades10:How far? Long time. |
ScrillyGOAT:I don't blame you, it is Ole I blame. Premier fans, especially Liverpool and Man City fans, don't know their mates again. United remains the best. ![]() |
maynation:You need to start showing respect to the best team in England. Apart from what Ole is doing, Man United is actually better than Liverpool... everyone knows it deep down. |
I am just speechless. Why can't we just let Ole go? Did Ole cast a spell on United? Man Utd is better than Liverpool, but Ole is just scattering everything. I wouldn't mind swapping coaches with Liverpool.... mehn! Ole won't do bad at Anfield. ![]() |
This is egregious. I give up. |
I just came to shake my head. #OleGunnerSolskjærOut! |
JESHAL:As G0LANHEIGHTS said, women are very patient with their plans. They know how to strike when the iron is hot. Also, a woman can maintain her chameleon masks for many years necessary, if possible, to get what she wants. The thing with polygamy is that it doesn't eliminate competition anxiety like monogamy, but that's as far as it goes. Polygamy and having many babymamas won't prevent women from playing their games. Polygamy is better than monogamy, but it has its downsides and it is not a cure-all for the issues associated with being in a committed relationship with a woman. |
Polynek:No, I don't have reservations. What might be different could just be the environment and society the man finds himself. That's as far as it goes. |
@JESHAL Is there any question you would want to ask? Let me think and give you a reply. |
adeotiabdulaziz:It's Watford. What does one expect from Watford? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 238 pages)


.... you know... be the right mate for that damaged good. Everyone has a past and old things are past away. 
