₦airaland Forum

A88C:
i am not out of the contest. the post aim to convince reader atheism are neccesity in an an atmospheree of change among beliver. i may not directly respond to the,question but i did not also fail to break the concept behind it which is atheism are not logical。 ithat is my wisdom my dear.

And that is how students fail, when instead of answering the exam questions as set, you elect to set yours and answer for the examiner to mark.

This post is defined by its content and the context it discusses it, digressing to refute the concept of atheism is an unnecessary distraction in this instance.

Babanah:
My brother there are checks and balances between all three arms of government. Hence the executive appoints the head of the judiciary while the legislature confirms the head of the judiciary.

Can't you see the irony in that?
you expect the judiciary to be independent when it's appointed by executive and confirmed by legislature?

luvmijeje:
Disjointed article. He's just jumping from one point to another with nonsensical analogy.

Even if you're a lone wolf you will die as a lone wolf. Because you're unorganized and unconstitutional.

That's why you are here to point out the disjointedness in the article.

@bolded, so you are constitutionally authorized to curse anyone that is unorganized?
I wonder which constitution is that?

A88C:
my esennce of that post is to refute all the claims of the atheist that they are wise and not specifically following the op though

And where is your wisdom in doing that?

I think It's best to address points in a discourse as raised, not refute claims that are way out of context of the subject matter.

orisa37:
It's a Voice from Hell. And no one is listening.

That you commented on an atheist related thread means you are not just listening but have heard.

Zico0:
Yep, man can't create a perfect god, but we just believe that god is perfect

Does that make sense to you?

A88C:
the argument always put forward by atheist are inapplicable ,irrelivant, always complexand often incomprehensible to digest.you,claim there is no GOD and yet you can not defend it .with all the common sense that made you adopt the ignorance concept（there is no GOD）.At least the beliver has use both quran and bible to substantiate their evidence.pls provide one fact from your science book or logical mind.

however the inteligent mind among you will soon find his way to GOD and failure to the rest of you who could not will not mean there is no way. denial of reality does not make it unreal. this is a science fact

And how does this relate to the OP?

EgunMogaji:
That's a business idea for you right there.

Yea Yea, that's a long shot sha...

Hey, come to think of it, in Nigeria we have driving school for Cars but none for bikes, why is that?

kingzizzy:
Countries are not generally allowed to interfere in the domestic affairs of another. What Britain did by imposing a blockade on the sovereign waters if another was illegal.

Freedom is one thing that has no high or low cost. You just strive to get it no matter what.

It's like you are not conversant with the art of warfare.

In war, if I am your ally I do every thing to make you win the war.

Forget sentiments.

miccollo47:
False!! It's actually called spot bike. Make una calm down.

Sure! You can spot the bike.

Blue3k:
I said main reason they lost. I did watch video I know they were out gunned. Second I didn't claim they were prepared starvation blockades to civilian population are pretty abnormal.

Check history, even in the bible blockades ( siege) does not differentiate between civilian and combatant population. So that is not an excuse.

kingzizzy:
Ojukwu was prepared to fight Nigeria, he was not prepsred to fight Nigeria, Britain and Russia.

The blockade was enforced by British Warships. If it hadnt been for that blockade, Ojukwu would have been able to sell Oil, import food and armaments and won the war

It's called allies.
Who were his allies?

He didn't consider that before going to war?

Bible says he that wants to build a house must first count the cost.

exlinkleads:
What is this smell of desperation in the air? Churches this days are so desperate that they are willing to mislead their congregations or innocent people out there just to get more and more gullible people to pay offering and tithe.

This sign post was shared by the "Sheeple" master himself, Daddy Freeze and he wrote:

"#FreeThePortharcourtSheeple they are a special breed!
-
#FreeTheSheeple

This is inflammatory and I wonder why our government cannot regulate what is put on a sign post and if is being regulated already, they (govt.) are doing a bad job about it. This to me is beyond inflammatory and things needs to be addressed.

Yes I " now churches are another form of MMM which promises everything about hope and yet actualization is a thing "of the gods" and yet the government have failed to regulate this people. At what point will we allow common sense which I believe is not common to prevail?

Reactions....


http://www.exlinklodge.com/2017/04/checkout-what-is-written-on-this-church.html

OP, I don't understand what is inflammatory there, is it daddyfreeze hashtag or the sign post?

Blue3k:
When you don't have arguements you resort to ad hominem attacks. The same happened in SW not the most peaceful region. 10 pages of talking could find any counter arguements to OP comments.

Ojukwu lost because of the Starvation blockade from what I can tell. I don't much about their tactics wHeather they were guerrilla fighting or more conventional.

Then you didn't watch that video.

The mercenaries said Biafrans were out numbered and out gunned.

Igbos always brag about weapons Biafrans invented during the war, but that video said it was France that supplied them.

I heard Ojukwu in that video say they prepared for that eventuality a long time, so why would blockade, which is a common strategy in warfare, affect them that much?

The "atheist" is now "the voice in the desert" calling on all to "reason" their religious ways.

I was expecting to see comments regarding the contents of the video, but every body is busy calling the OP Names and distracting from the implications of the video.

SMH.

Hhhhhmmmmm

Lets not forget what Jesus achieved on the cross wouldn't have been possible without a Judas.

We all castigate Esau for selling his birthday right for a morsel yet forgets that God hated him from the womb (who can win in life when God hates one? Yet God is Love) and celebrate Jacob the crook.

There is a lesson to learn from them all... Without a Judas in your life, you won't make it to your cross.

Ade3000yrs:
I did my enquiry and d only tin dat sells next to opium and cocaine in Africa is football, almost every Nigerian is a fan to either barca, arsenal, Chelsea, real Madrid or man u, but to what end?? what economic value is dis adding to Africa??

Check the bet shops.

A88C:
defined GOD base on the concept of your logic to defend that he did not exist. YOU HAVE MUCH TO ARGUE BUT LESS TO SAY

You can't put words in his mouth.

if he said "God does not exist," why do you want him to define based on logic? He has no idea to formulate a concept of God.

You say "God exist," You are the one to define God since you have seen and knows what he looks like and feels like.

Hhhhhmmmmm

So many views no comments.

How do you define God without quoting what another man thought is God?

You claim to believe in God because you read the Bible, and that is final. Good.

That is a history of a people and their relationship with what or who they say was/is their God.

Saying atheist have less to say but much to argue, is a wrong choice of words if you know what to argue means.

I have come to understand that what we are made to believe as God is not the whole truth.

We all are arguing for/against based on hearsay, with no concrete proof of personally identifying and knowing who God is.

Moses and some Elders saw God and dined with him, Abraham and his wife saw God and dined with him, But John (1:18) told us no man has seen God at any time.
Whose report are we to believe?

Are we to define God or his existence based on Moses', Abraham's or John's definition? Then that is hearsay.

A88C:
1 DEFINE GOD？
This question may sound absurd to him but it is logical （example）if i argue that this is not a religious thread.i should be able to give an understanding of what is expected of a religious thread.

ask them to define God and you will realised they have less to say but much to argue.

2ask them personally to tell you how they belive GOD do not exist personally not using a generic argument.

you will realised again they will have less to say but much to argue.

THE BELIVER CAN ADD MORE WHILE THE THREAD IS OPEN FOR A DEBATE WITH AN ATHIEST

Zico0:
'course, god's word written by people -- Apperceptions
Btw, are people perfect?

Meaning God is a creation of man, and since man is not perfect, he can't create a perfect God.
Great!

Zico0:
Would y'all just let others behave like religious people too, but I ain't with the killings and Islam-Christianity bigotry though? We all know the Bible isn't perfect but just allow christianity and its apperceptions of god be, however way it is spelt, so that we can find meaning in life also in it. We do not need to be that critical to their beliefs at times. For what is life without god, hmm? I believe in god, in me.

That is allegedly admitting that God is not perfect, after we are told the Bible is God's word?

adepeter26:
I Ve created a thread on that. Let's read their opinions and views
I hope they even subscribe to the thread by commenting

Where is the link?

Hahahahahahahaha

That doctor's certificate is questionable and should be withdrawn.

80 tablets and he could not kick the bucket?

Calling Anybody that "attempted" suicide and failed, a failure is a compliment.

I guess as someone rightly observed, "dead men don't announce their obituary," so "he was not ready to kill himself"

Serpent didn't mean what we are Made to believe.
One of the attributes of Serpent is wise, creative, and only a God can be that wise or creative.

When was serpent created that it would be wiser or more creative than man?

The complete title was "the serpent God," but leaving out the last word gave it a different meaning.

I have come to understand and know that the serpent stood for good not evil, else Moses would not have used the "brass serpent" to heal the people of Isreal or we would not be using the serpent symbol to represent the medical (healing) profession.

Remember history is always written in retrospect.

At lest now they can officially criticize whatever...

We are all atheists since we all don't believe one or the same thing.

Hhhhhmmmmm

... But if the Brian is the most powerful sex organ, and thought is real, having mental sex with your spouse while masturbating cannot be that bad.

After all, the Bible say if one looks/thinks lustfully about a person, one has already committed, so why not make that person your spouse?

It would be doubly wrong for my spouse to be physically away and mentally away from me.

But wait Oooooh, while single one is told not to indulge sexual pleasures and now that one is finally married same still applies?

phabuloz:
If to a Christian man this is a sin, then a Christian man shouldn't also use a condom cos they're both the same....

There are two ways to it:

1) Technically they are not the same, the one that uses a condom releases his sperm while still inside the vagina, but gets 0% skin-to-skin pleasure while the one that doesn't use condom releases his sperm outside the vagina but gets 90% skin-to-skin pleasure.

2) technically they are the same because the sperm does not fertilize the woman.

As to whether Onanism (coitus interruptus) is a sin depends on which side of the law you are.

hahn:
What I do not understand is what exactly is how the business of Isaac, Abraham and Jacob any concern of us as Africans

Are we Jews? Is anyone here Palestine?

... Because we have claimed to be the lost tribes of Israel.

adepeter26:
God repented?

Buhahahahahahahahaha

What other explanation is there for God not confounding scientists and space explorers?

ednut1:
From d tower of babel story it can be implied heaven is in the skies and he confused them so they wont reach der. . Bt when oyinbos were inventing space crafts why did God not confuse them. Or is it that heaven was never in the skies or it was moved . I am not understanding. Who can shed more light

God Repented, which goes against doctrinal teachings that God does not change.