Empiree:
This lecture was yesterday. See comments

Hkana:
Thanks for that.

My interest started waning when I watched a lecture where he brought "an orthodox Christian" to come address Muslims. At the time, I was already vexed by the too many glowing compliments he was paying the orthodox Christians.

Hkana:
What's Ilm falfasa?


I've long stopped taking SIH seriously so I couldn't really be bothered by anything new he says.

Empiree:


I am believer in ilm falfasa but she. Imran had taken his philosophy to another level

Empiree:
In most cases these pastors lie a lot based on my experiences with Christians. They usually say stuff like this to create doubt in the heart of Muslims to weaken them. Allah Alam if he was saying the truth about his conversion because of the Ayah. As you can see video of pastor Shonibare it is somewhat old. It was around 1999/2000. But what's funny is that, anytime they come up with frivolous stories like that they help to do more research. Almost every time I or other Muslim comparators debate Christians, they will most likely bring the verse to challenge us. They are trained in their Bible studies to use the ayah. If you read their 1994 manifesto it says it all. Even few year ago, maybe 2015, same Jamiu Adegunwa had debate with another at RCCG in Lagos. The Evangelist brought up the verse. They are trained to use the verse.


Na'am!!!

ALL of them would always go for the ayas that are most likey to cause schism!
That's how one came and said to me that he would PROVE to me that RasulAllah (S.A.W.) bowed to the superiority, might and power of ISA (A.S.)!!
I said to him: In this Quran?! Please, show it to me and IF you do, then I will become a christian as you have always wanted!
I brought the Quran forward and asked him to SHOW me where the bowing took place.
He then began to dribble with words - while refusing to engage with the Quran
I asked him to tell me the chapter and verse so I can HELP him view it in the Quran.
He then started telling me that he is seasoned because he went to a Theologic school...
I told him congrats on that but I NEED you to SHOW me where this bowing to prophet ISA (A.S.) superiority, might, and power is!
When he felt cornered, he called on another christian brother of his - for reinforcement - and after he told that one of how STUBBORN I was, that one began to say that my issue could be a strong case of possession

Anyway, yes, that's how they are. They'll pinpoint verses that may seen ambigous in order to flaw those who aren't prepared.



This is why I reject Sh. Imran on this. His interpretation of Sura Al-Imran 55 aligns with the pastor. Hence, the reason I rejected it. No Muslims interpreted it that way. Even the basic understanding is that the Ayah still refers to Muslims because Jesus himself was. The Ayah is not complicated at all. Why would a whole Sheikh insists the Ayah is speaking about Christians while ignored other verses that counter them?.

SIH wants to favour the Chrisitans at all cost and the end game is for Muslims to SUBMIT to be RULED by them!
He has said this but I don't think that people are really listening to what he's saying.


exactly... It is one thing to recite the verse the way he wants to fit his narrative. It is another thing entirely to claimed shaytan and Dajjal corrupted and smuggled kesro in the verse astagfurllah... This is kufr statement but I won't call him kafir. How could shaytan and Dajjal corrupted the verse because of tashreek just to satisfy his ego when Allāh had declared

Truly, calling him a Kafir is a bit too much in my view, but what he has done and still doing is a clear pointer in that direction!
There's a level of recklessness in his speech that is becoming alarmingly dangerous and I pray that Allah blesses and guides his heart aright, Amin.

He has mentioned that the BOOK which ASIF got the knowledge from is NOT the Quran or any other divine book, but it was a book on THERMODYNAMICS!!!!
How he arrived at this conclusion is a mystery which he isn't willing to share.
Any further questions directed at him to explain will cause series of explos!ons from him!



"And We did not send before you any messenger or prophet except that when he spoke [or recited], Satan threw into it [some misunderstanding]. But Allah abolishes that which Satan throws in; then Allah makes precise His verses. And Allah is Knowing and Wise."

"That is] so He may make what Satan throws in [i.e., asserts] a trial for those within whose hearts is disease1 and those hard of heart. And indeed, the wrongdoers are in extreme dissension. Q22:52


Indeed, the Quran is such that it will excavate that which is deeply buried in the heart of man!
One needs to constantly seek refuge in Allah.



Sh. Imran needs to be very careful because his words were very heavy. When I challenged him that the way he interpreted the Ayah may lead Muslims astray.. He can care less. He said Quran is the truth unless I want to disobey Quran.


Hmm, so you are the one likely to disobey the Quran while he follows it to the T ?!
Yes, Quran is the truth and he, SIH is not the custodian of its Truth, neither does he have a monopoly to its meanings.
I think that where his shine is in:
- the methodology of studying the Quran as well as Quran and the moon, even though he could't help himself by interjecting his THOUGHTS into events here and there.
- history, geopolitics, finance.


As for the science of the letters and Quran, he needs to chill and admit to himself that it's not his forte!
The more he engages in this matter, the more his gaps become more evident.
Nothing wrong in not knowing, but be humble enough to say: this is not my specialty.
How can the whole ummah be blind to what dajjal/satan "did" for over 1400 years and he is the ONLY one who "caught" it ?!
He may have what is known as a SUPERHERO COMPLEX.

Empiree:
This is the pastor I was talking about, pastor Shonibare who claimed to be Muslim and his son converted him to Christianity. He briefly narrated his conversion in this video in a debate with Ustaz Jamiu Adegunwa decades ago from 10mins

https://www.facebook.com/www.risalatulhaqdawah.org/videos/3198872247098251/

So as you rightly said, he was "musulumi olobeyo". He cited Ayah in sura Al-Imran 55 which Sheikh Imran Hussein now emphasized today.

In this YouTube video below this woman tries to defend Sheikh Imran Hussein on alleged verse in surah Zhukhruf


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0tO2QiUPCk

Empiree:
check this out. Not sure. I'm still searching

https://www.facebook.com/100066690938924/videos/659556152003454/


Modified

https://www.facebook.com/100066690938924/videos/1163124934486796/


movado19

AlBaqir:


@movado19

The "waaw (and)" is no doubt "waaw al-atf (conjunctive waaw); and the pronoun "HU" goes back to Jesus. The siyak (context) of the verse and the syntax rules within it makes it evident even though some claim that the pronoun "HU (he or it)" refers to the Qur'an.

However, the muraad (meaning) of the verse is what is important and not necessarily the pronoun.


Thanks a lot Shaykh AlBaqir.
In trying to understand your explanation, I had to go back a few verses (from verse 57) and read the subject as nabi Isa A.S. all the way to that verse 61, hence the use of the waw al-'atf to show an affinity between what was being discussed prior to verse 61 and the content of verse 61.

Is this correct in your view?

Jazakallah khair.

Empiree:
Absolutely you are right.



one clear example that Christians were never in Medina was a seerah. It is also famous Hadith. It was in the masjid where Nabi Muhammad, his companions and Nassara were in the masjid. They were having what I called meeting. Then it was time of salat for Nassara. It was in the afternoon which means they wanted to offer their zuhr Salah. So they wanted to step out of masjid to go to their own masjid. Nabi Muhammad told them to pray inside masjid right there and they did. Question is, if Nassara prayed salat in the afternoon, which Salat Christians prayed then and now?. This is one of the evidences that Christianity/Christians were never in Medina.



I told him this too. It was a long message I sent him on YouTube. His reply to this was, "Orthodox Christianity doesn't believe in Trinity and that they believe Father is greater than son. And since father is greater than son, they have affirmed superiority of Allah. So by definition of Islam, they are Muslims in the sight of Allāh. This is exactly how he put it. I wasted no time. I googled Orthodox Christianity on Trinity. It shows they believe in Trinity. I sent him my findings but he never replied till now. This was over 2 years now.

What he says is not in alignment with what Allah says in the Quran.
Allah displayed their belief and utterance in the trinity at various instances in the Quran, so much so that He has established that he will ask Nabi Isa A.S. on the day of reckoning if he was the one that ordered them to say 3 instead of 1 and also if he ordered them to worship he and his mother? Surah Al Maida Q5:116-118
Then how does SIH come up with such weak logic about father being greater? Is he more aware of their psyche than Allah?

Is he talking about the same people who say he - Nabi Isa is the son of Allah/ Allah himself these days (Astagfirullah) ? Surah Al-Ikhlas Q112:1-4
Or that they say that his mother is the mother and some insinuate further that she is the wife of Allah.
Surah Al-Anam - Q6:101.

The truth is plain and clear for all to see. He will not reply you as it doesn't fit his plans.

Empiree:
I have just got time to watch the video. Pretty much not new from what he has been saying in recent years. I asked him a question about solitary Hadith. The Hadith is very known so I won't quote it but I will paraphrase it. The Hadith says the Jews and the Christians took the graves of their prophets as places of worship. Question is, who was the Prophet of Nassara?. I threw this question to sheikh over 2 years ago but he never replied to this specific question.


That is because it doesn't serve his agenda.


Speaking of tashreek, Sheikh said if Ibn Abass(ra) could recite the Ayah La alam then we can not fault him. My observation is, it is character of Sheikh to reject or doubt solitary Hadith. So why now sheikh accepted this solitary Hadith over entire ummah?. As we all know, Quran was reviewed with Nabi Muhammad few times before his demise. So, is Sheikh telling us that only Ibn Abass was right in the exact pronunciation and the rest were wrong?. He also contradicted himself when he said it was the later ummah that applied tashkeel wrongly on la ilm instead la alam. If that's the case, why was tashkeels not the problem for the entire ummah in the time of Sahaba?. Why only verse 61 singled out?.

I was also rather shocked to see him in support of a lone hadith because of how he would strongly oppose and bypass it in the past.
He mentions Ibn Abass constantly in order to drown out the recitation of the the others; as if they never exisited and when the wager became too great, he began by saying - just as you mentioned - that it was "perhaps mistakenly placed in there, and then he became enboldened and subsequently began to say that dajjal and shaitain added it in there, thereby strongly insinuating that Allah failed in the preservation of the Quran as He had promised. Astahfirullah! The Rasul S.A.W. failed in capturing the infiltration by dajjal and shaitan and the entire ummah failed in spotting them all these years until he, SIH came along!

The stakes are too high for him now and I sense a desperation for him to be right in his predictions, hence that verse enables him support his agenda.

This was done years ago. I used to see some muslims and even translated QUR'AN placed Ibrahim in parentheses. I had to correct them.




I knew commented about this issue with him years ago. I told him that he's not doing what he condemned Harun Yahya of over 15 years ago. The video should be on YouTube still. He accused Harun Yahya of promoting fraternal relationship btw Islam and CHRISTIANITY as one religion and warned his students to be cautious of him. That because of Harun Yahya's approach, western world promoted him as Islamic scholar. He's now doing the same.

Empiree:
while I respect his opinion, I believe he's entitled to it because sometimes, ummah didn't get it right until someone later calls our attention to certain errors. For instance, Rajm. Rajam was truly a ruling of Allah but that was in the old Laws not QUR'AN. But for some reason, the ummah of Nabi Muhammad SAW believe the ruling still exist in the Quran but the Ayah has been removed. This is what the ummah believe. This is very incorrect. The Hudud in the Quran is now flogging not stoning. So sheikh Imran is right on this but doesn't mean he's right as the time.

I remember watching his videos then on this and how he expounded on the concept and its abrogation. It helped clear the doubt I had then.
Yes, just like any human, we are all prone to errors, be it the educated or non-educated ones.


exactly... This shows that you really you his lectures. He get upset. This isn't cool. Does he think only salafis are against him.


Surah Al-Imran Q3:159 says:
"It is the mercy of Allah that you were tender to them (O Muhammad S.A.W), for if you had been stern and hard-hearted, they would have dispersed from around you......"

Even his students - I have sensed - are somewhat weary of asking questions for the fear of being rebutted and classed as those with 2rupees worth of brain/sense!
This is not the spirit of scholarship and all he will end up doing is raising a generation of mini-me's who'll parrot his style, which is already happening.


Absolutely... So, as far as I am concerned, لَعِلْمٌۭ is correct. The Ayah is similar to Sura Hajj vs 78

"It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this (the Qur'an),..."


Ma Sha Allah! This verse you have cited is a verse of assurance and certainty, in my view because it deftly puts aside the argument that the Nassaras are the true followers of Isa A.S., as purported by SIH. It has always been Islam/Muslims, ab initio.
Infact, what SIH is pandering is in great contrast to the meaning of LA ILLAHA ILLA ALLAH - Allah is saying one thing and he is saying another.

May Allah save us from the spirit of arrogance and spiritual ego. Amin.
May what we strive to build all the years of our lives not be pulled down by our whims and self-adoration. Amin.


Some interpreted He in that verse to Nabi Ibrahim (as). If that's the case, who named Muslims before Ibrahim (as)?. Similarly, Ayah 61 of sura Zhukhruf refers to Allah's knowledge of the Hour not Jesus because I'm Christian bible in the book of Matthew 24:36


Exactly! There's no way the "He" in that verse is referring to Nabi Ibrahim (A.S.).
There is a continous consistency in the usage of the word (HUWA)
- "He has chosen you and has not laid upon you any hardship in religion - this is the faith of your father Ibrahim."
there is a comparison of the present people's faith to Prophet Ibrahim's A.S. faith in order to establish a continuum of Allah's Sunnatullah.
- "He has named you Muslims before this, and in this scripture, so that the messenger may be a witness about you.....
How could (he) be referring to Nabi Ibrahim A.S.? Are they saying that he is the one who named us Muslims in the Quran? How?
What other verses and ahadith do they have in support of this?
This is not in conformity with Allah's Sunnatullah, because Allah says in Surah Al-Isra A17:77...."and you will not find any change in our way."
- "He is your protector. A blessed protector and a blessed helper!"
Are they going to also say that Nabi Ibrahim A.S. is now our protector?!

The three instances of (He - HUWA) are consistent with Allah. He chooses, names and protects/helps!



Jesus reported to have said:

"But about that Day or Hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

You see now...gross error indeed. You should ask him why he was so much concerned about Khilifa?. Why did he ignore other verses where Allah repeatedly said Islam will triumph?.

SIH has become what some could term the PR machine for the orthodox christians - I have seen several times his mild and overtly friendly manner towards them and his harshness towards the muslims. This he doesn't hide.
He recently - in an interview in the UK - spoke with three men and he told them that: "There are more sheep and cattle in Islam than in Christianity!" This is no different from someone displaying his family members in the public to be ridiculed! What for?

SIH does not believe in the triumph of Islam! I don't think people really listened to his stance on Islam/Muslims surrendering to a Christian rule till eternity in order for us to reach Firdaws, according to him!!! More like a tongue-in-cheek insult.
That statement alone has removed the curtain and things are clear to see for those who truly want to see.
Yes, he may have a wealth of education in international relations , finance and all, but I pray people do not get mesmerized by all that and forget about the main reasons for listening to him to begin with.


It is because of his interpretation of Al-Imran 55 and his consistently saying Orthodox Christianity will rule over muslims that I now reject the return of Jesus. Mudir'murkaz, Ustaz Jamiu Adegunwa etc are right.
And if dajjal will arrive, Allah Himself will get rid of him. He doesn't need Jesus to come and deal with dajjal. If Allah will obliterate yajuj wa majuj, how can He not destroy Dajjal?.


Exactly! The one who made the rules is never constrained by His rules.


This is why those aHadith that speak on return of Isa (as) seem to promote Christianity in my view. They portray Jesus as savior of Muslims. Pastors have use those Hadith to convert Muslims.

Aqidah, aqidah, aqadah!!!!
Foundation matters oh! It's not to go about shouting I am a Muslim.
See the wind that blew their way and they scattered!
May Allah bless us with eyes that see and hearts that clearly discern night from day. Amin.


Also sheik Imran Hussein interpretation of Al-Imran 55 is error. A pastor in Nigeria whose name is Pastor Shonibare converted to Christianity because of this Ayah. His son called his attention to the verse and he said, "wow I have been reading this Ayah for long but I didn't know that the Ayah is calling me to Christianity... So if the Ayah says followers of Jesus will be superior why don't I simply join Christianity?".
That's how he gone since then. He narrated his own story on stage.

Shaikh Empiree, wallah those people who are in this category as the pastor above, if you dig deeper, you will most likely find the following:
1. No strong Islamic foundation. Without this, everything else crumbles.
2. A case of parroting those around. My shaikh said, my Imam said, etc
3. There is no tafakkur concerning their lives, their hearts, the Quran they read - if any at all, what they are told/fed, etc.
4. Mechanical understanding of the Quran. Non-inquisitive nature as to what they read and why they read it.
5. Little to zero research on deen.


So Sheikh Imran Hussein is supporting such view as well. I have told him three times about the danger of his view . The Ayah is talking about yahud and Nassara at the time. And the believers in Jesus were later made superior to those who rejected him. Believers at the time were not Christians.

Very true. Christianity was a later development.
SIH will not accord you any importance. I have seen the arrogance ooze in his speeches and relations with other people.
He recently said that no one can go any higher that where he has in his eschatological scholarship!
I pray he self-reflects because like he keeps saying, he is an old man in his 80's and could be called by Allah at any time.
I have no doubt benefited immensely from him in the past and I pray that Allah blesses and aids him in the true direction.
Just like money and power, knowledge definitely intoxicates and if not careful, could lead one out of the folds of Islam.
Everything that we have are gifts and simultaneously tests from Allah. We should never forget that!


When I told SIH this, he said it does6 matter whether Nassara are Christians or not. He said they believe in Jesus that's all that matters. Hence, the Ayah refers to them.

Look at that!
How doesn't it matter when his utterances are leading people off the cliff!
That is such a crucial and pivotal concept and he just brushed it away in order not to engage with you!
Is he going to say that he is not aware of Allah's vehemence against trinity in the Quran?
Thank God, the trinity ayahs are clear even for the lay man to understand and don't require Ta'wil.
He desperately wants his views to fit but that's not how Allah operates.
Surah At-Takwir Q81:29 Allah says: "You shall not will except as Allah wills......"


But he ignored where Allah plainly said they have disbelieve those who say Trinity or call Jesus God etc. My conclusion is, Sheikh is blind by current world affairs.


His accuracy in world geopolitical events - which he MaSha Allah clearly has knowledge in - has made him throw caution to the wind and thus become heavily inebriated.

Wallah, unless one holds firmly to Allah, the siren song of this world in the form of praises, followers, knowledge, monetary wealth, influence, etc can render one feeling at par with Allah or believing one to be immune to the traps of the nafs, not knowing that the next step could be the one down the high and steep cliff.

May Allah guide him and everyone of us to imbibe the spirit of humility and our end be superior to our beginning, Amin.

Empiree:
I have requested for short lecture on the verse explained by Sheikh Mubarak. Hopefully I get it soon.


InshaAllah.

Empiree:
walaikun salaam,

Thank you for your take and analysis.

I saw rebuttal by Sheikh Hassan who in recent time has been criticizing Sheikh Imran Hussein. He called him kafir on this issue you raised for his utterances. I was once hardcore fan of Sheikh Imran Hussein but as years go by I find myself rejecting/disagreeing with him especially from the way he understands Sura Al-Imran verse 55 which he repeated by proxy in this video you posted.


Yes, I also saw Shaikh Hassan Ali's rebuttal of SIH. There are other scholars who have also called his attention to what he's uttered but he insists that he is right and the ummah is/has been blind all along.


One thing I like about him is that he always said that no one should agree or accept his view unless and until we are convinced he's right.

In all honesty, he says that but then doesn't leave room for others to ask him questions that seem challenging. When this happens, he gets into a fit which is not okay for anyone, how much more a scholar.

I am now of the opinion that Ayah 62 sura zhukhruf refers to knowledge of the Hour i:e Allah, Quran not Jesus. It doesn't indicate return of Isa (as). It is true that tashkeels were not revealed with Quran. But this doesn't change the pronunciation and the meaning. All I can say for now is that sheikh Imran Hussein should be careful not to be carried away because of his so called "love and affection" for the Orthodox Christians.

Correct. The tashkeels are the ruh which power each letter consonant; as without them, they are just potentials. They cannot be divorced from the letters orally or in written form, therefore, when reciting the Quran, one will hear their presence and also when written, one will see their presence.
Hence the beauty of being able to correctly verify what one hears by seeing and verify what one sees by hearing.

The Ayah he quoted in Al-Imran 55, I have argued with him on this Ayah 3 times but unfortunately he refused to reply properly. His interpretation is that the Ayah is talking about Christians who "follow" Jesus. Christians were never followers of Jesus. What Quran mentions is Nassara. Nassara doesn't mean Christians. Christians existed in the time of Nabi Muhammad SAW but they we're never in Medina contrary to popular opinion that Christians were in Medina. They were in Rome at the time.

So sheikh is saying that Ayah 55 means Orthodox Christianity will triumph and rule the world over western Christianity and Muslims. This is gross error.. Muslims have been praying Salat for over 1400 years. If keferi will triumph and rule over Muslims till Qiyyama, why are we still praying Salat then?. Why don't we just be Orthodox Christians instead of wasting our time 5 times a day, fast in Ramadan, go to Hajj etc. Allah is just.

Honestly, I thought I did not hear him right all this while until he explicitly made it clear once more in this video on his stance about the Ummah of Rasul Allah S.A.W. to be ruled by those whom Allah has expressedly said DO NOT BELEIVE!
According to him in this video (from the 1:01:04 mark):

"We have an obsession with rule as Muslims. But Our job is NOT TO RULE!
We are the ummah of Al Firdaws and IF you want Al Firdaws, BE PREPARED NOT TO RULE, BUT TO BE RULED!"

This is more than gross error. This is a travesty in its full glory! How he deduced this falsity from the Quran is beyond comprehension.
Exactly! What then is the purpose of Islam?
Why then all the sacrifices of Muslims all these thousands of years?
Why don't we all pack up and swing to the "ruling" party till judgement day?
Is he saying that Allah is not just? Nauzubillah!
Allah says in the same Surah Al-Imran Q3:19 Inna deena 'inda Allahi-l- Islam (the deen recognized by Allah is Islam)......


So sura Al-Imran 55 is referring to the people that lived at the time of Jesus. Jesus true followers were superior to those who disbelieved in him. And besides, both Qur'an and Bible confirm that Jesus was sent only to his own people. This is why I begin to doubt those aHadith that speak about his second coming. They contradict Quran and they contradict themselves.

I used to translate Q43:61 as appearance of Jesus is the Sign of the Hour. I now put this view side. Allah himself took Jesus soul and he's dead... Not coming back.


Nabi Isa A.S. was never sent to the whole of mankind, rather, just to a specific ummah, as you've rightly pointed out and the way I see it, SIH is trying his best to construct a line of best fit by fiddling with the data points and axial scales! This just forces the plot/chart to fit the story.

I would like @ Shaikh AlBaqir or anyone else who is versed in grammar to kindly come do an exposition on this Ayah (Q43:61), with respect to the connective particle WAAW, when he is chanced.

Ugaboy:
Hi Nairalander and Data Science ethusiaste, remember my startup during February I guess on Tableau

https://www.nairaland.com/6973820/please-rate-first-data-visualization

Well, there have been lot of advance visualization i've done so far, I've completed some machine learning milestone project with 18 viz dashboard completed

here is a viz challenge i picked from LinkedIn this month

Tools:
1. Excel (Data cleaning)
2. Figma (Bin or Conatiner Design)
3. Tableau Public (Visualization)


Pls Which of the 3 can i submit


Some of us are football lovers, so I analysed one...added to show us...how i've gone.

Excel70:

He did not mention why

2 yes the honey serves as a repellant

Excel70:

Jazakhumullahi khayran
I learnt from experienced Alfa's that recitation of Ya Latest attract a particular type of jinns that have sexual intercourse with humans in dreams. You are advised to kick honey intermittently when engaging in its recitation.

Empiree:
^^^^

I wish you could do the quote very well so I can read btw the lines. Looks like you quoted me from 2014.

movado19

Empiree:
Salaam Alaikum Waramotulahi Wabarakatu

On the issues on ground regarding Oba Alaafin Lamidi Adeyemi's death and burial. What's are your thoughts?.

Empiree:
Eld Mubarak gbogbo ile

PrinceAsaba:
Salam alaikum wahramtullah wabarakatuh.
Dear Empiree, Movado19, AlhajiEmeritus and all the schorlar in the house. It's stated in Quran that Quran is Shifaa and Rahmah to the believers..

Is their any ayat that serve as a Shifaa for liver disease or something like that?

Thank You in anticipation

LadunaI:

Lol, So perhaps, my config react oppositely to the norm .

Allah creates as He wills without questioning or reckoning.

This is one of the areas of specialization of those Sheikhs the new generation want to belittle at all cost and spit at.
This is the reason why not every dua or zikr is ideal for everyone. Case in point: The brother who lamented that Ikupakuti gave him Yasin 19x and thus experience some things which he thought were negative. Ideally, he should have carried out several cleansing and fortification exercises before commencing because he may not be spiritually strong as such to withstand the effects; especially if he has not been practicing such in the past...if that were truly the case, then there is no how he would not have experienced one form of healing crisis or the other...

Actually, generally speaking, now and if then, sakinah that accompanying during and after salawat can't be quantified, the soothing effect dispelled all the worries immediately and sense of calmness pervades all the body and soul.
Na'am.

But the experience am talking about is attendance effect of this in term of purity this has brought upon the soul which manifested during "transitioning" of the soul momentarily in the course of falling asleep with awe inspiring experience that depict 'jalali" effect.
Subhanallah! Your config na real wa!

Note this isn't dream, far from it, because consciousness and awareness is still there to know the dichotomy about physical state and where one is seemingly heading.
Na'am.

Though always happened momentarily but extremely tremendous and stressful but after that a blazing and soothing lucid dreams or spiritual travels followed. I don't if you get my gist?
Let me be quiet...your name (Ladunal) truly, truly fits you
May Allah continuously safeguard everything about you, Amin.

LadunaI:

Are you sure about this my sister? . From personal experience the effect of salawat when it get to certain stage if like jalalu. I nearly abandon it during my assiduous year. I have concluded on one night after my Tahajuud that I won't do salawat again because the effects was just down too tremendous.

It's just I am witnesses the transof

Raalsalghul:


We would appreciated one or two pointers.

Felixitie:


I have worked on this actual dataset before, using powerbi. It is a straight forward thing bro. I did without watching a video. Follow the insights you are asked to get.

Empiree:
Albaqir