₦airaland Forum

Ishilove: Some what?!?

Ishilove: Quit being an irritant. I can see you have been drinking your cheap ogogoro again.

hehehehehe
I don't drink alcohol. You need some shags baby

Ishilove: See, what happened was I called and pretended it was a wrong number.I threw a random name in the air and you politely informed me that you were not Sulaimon. I think you were drowsy because it sounded like I woke you up .

Well if you aint igbo, then you sure had a conk 'African' accent

na your way. You don get the boyfriend yet?

Alfa Seltzer: How? Pray ...tell.

just pretend to be someone else and go through this thread again.

joel lala: LoL..This is coming from a guy that believes in aliens and star trek movies..yawns

er bros, this is a classic ad hominem. Why not address the bible verse he quoted? Surely he didn't manufacture it. And btw, that your sophistry on the mustard seed was pitiable. Its the usual shifting of goal posts you christian apologists are known for. The passage clearly said that the mustard was the smallest of all seeds and that it grows into a big tree. A clearly ignorant statement from an omniscient god

Alfa has been debunked!!! Dohohohohoho. Your slander no work this time

Ajibam: I go through all threads as a mod

it doesn't mean you must contribute. If you have nothing sensible to say just read through and pass. Stop trolling, you're ruining my ministry

Logicboy03: Divide and conquer.....smh

1) Is there a difference between what I said and Alfa said
2) Alfa is also an atheist. An atheistic satanist
3) Did Alfa not even support my comment?


lol....nice try, Texanomal....try again

This is not a divide and conquer issue. You were simply rude in answering her. As always. . .

Don't you just miss Anony never thought I would but...

Logicboy03: Italo the dribbler
The Denier!!!!!


Gaddem! This guy can dribble logic!! Chei!!!

he's stuck in a maze. Decoherence...hehehehehehe

Logicboy03: How illogical....so you would ban Alfa for doing the same thing that you yourself legally did?

you expect too much from him. It should have been obvious by now...

^^^

Ajibam: Proverb26vs17
17 Interfering in someone else’s argument
is as foolish as yanking a dog’s ears.

so what exactly were you doing here? Seeing as christian was not mentioned here, nevertheless we always welcome sensible contributions from anybody but still we get neither from you. So, what exactly are you doing here?

Organ donation and cremation.

Ajibam: Lol..I see..
Praise master Jesus

Can you attempt answering the OP? Or is it beyond your intellectual capability?

Ajibam stop doing my job!

wiki baby: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a molecule that encodes the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms and many viruses. DNA and RNA are nucleic acids; alongside proteins, they compose the three major macromolecules essential for all known forms of life. Most DNA molecules are double-stranded helices, consisting of two long biopolymers made of simpler units called nucleotides—each nucleotide is composed of a nucleobase (guanine, adenine, thymine, and cytosine), recorded using the letters G, A, T, and C, as well as a backbone made of alternating sugars (deoxyribose) and phosphate groups (related to phosphoric acid), with the nucleobases (G, A, T, C) attached to the sugars. DNA is well-suited for biological information storage, since the DNA backbone is resistant to cleavage and the double-stranded structure provides the molecule with a built-in duplicate of the encoded information.

forgive me, for I am a simple minded fool but our beloved wiki baby seems to be saying that the Almighty DNA is actually a physical molecule. In fact, made up of carbon bases and has a physical location inside a cell...yadayadayada.

OTOH...

wiki baby: A code is a rule for converting a piece of information (for example, a letter, word, phrase, or gesture) into another - usually shortened or covert - form or representation (one sign into another sign), not necessarily of the same type...

Before giving a mathematically precise definition, we give a brief example. The mapping
C= {a---»0, b---»01, c---»011}

is a code, whose source alphabet is the set{a,b,c} and whose target alphabet is the set{0,1} . Using the extension of the code, the encoded string 0011001011 can be grouped into codewords as 0 011 0 01 011, and these in turn can be decoded to the sequence of source symbols acabc.

my good maesters, I should think now that it should be clear that the DNA is NOT a code, but rather a physical molecules that contains some set of codes; much like a DVD plate containing codes that when inserted into a dvd player(RNA) produces P.O.R.N.!!! (proteins).

Er...what is this argument all about again?

Uyi Iredia: . . . and is space. Don't forget that. It so happens that I think telekinesis has its shortcomings: popular depictiobs of it involve already extant matter. I have it in mind to find a better word for it.

TELEPATHY

Hehehehehe.

obadiah777: YOU DO ERR @OP, EVERYTHING YOU SEE THERE IS SYMBOLIC.

There was no rahab, Ruth,or Bathsheba. They all symbolise er...er...
Yadayadayada..

striktlymi: Lol!!!

I meant I don't take bear.

er...me too. That would be disastrous now don't you think?

Reyginus: God for you

Satan for Alfa Seltzer

Red-Light:
it's live on ait

Bros i no get local station o. Na Nigeria Info things now.

Rain don spoil my DSTV connection o! Na radio things now. . .

italo: Oga wey know pass everybody.

Wisdom cometh not from volume of books read.

what!!!
I actually agree with you.

2 miracles in a day!

Jah Jehovah Emmanuel. Holy!

aManFromMars: Some faith strong sha...

more like delusion.
Auto repeat...

Talking chair!!!

Its a miracle

where do all the thieves, armed robbers, and swindlers fit in?

italo: When you say man evolved from fish because a science journal says so.

Thats circular reasoning too.

When you say it is logical because logic says so, thats circular reasoning too.

Imagine who as talking to. Mcheew!

italo: You are saying a falsified "evidence" makes a belief true if the forgery is not proved.

If you are a woman and you produce a fake picture showing you to appear like a man but no one has proved it is fake, the picture makes you a man?

And you call me foolish?

Lol.

You are too foolish italo. How do you know the picture is fake? How did you determine that I was a woman who provided a mans picture? Do you think you can just wish evidence into reality like your god?
I'm done with you man.

^^^^
How can somebody be this dull?

italo: It is you that considers a picture as evidence, not everyone.

And remember, my initial question was: what makes beliefs true?

Pictures dont prove a belief to be true.

There are millions of pictures that are lies. So if you say a picture is evidence, it means "evidence" doesnt make beliefs true.

And I checked "reasonable."

Its meaning suggests that my doubt is reasonable.

italo: If "evidence" can possible be false, how then can it make beliefs true?

Bros, I think you are seriously fooolish but I'll try one last time.

Evidence/Facts make belief true. How? Listen...

I say I am a man, you say prove it. I provide a picture. Of course the picture can be falsified, but then, it is now on you to show how the picture is false. If you cannot do that then we have to assume that the picture is genuine until proven otherwise. That then shows that the evidence of my picture proves my belief to be true that I'm a man. Kapisce?

Its simple man, you just want to be fooolish. You have a brain, when you make a claim you have to prove it true or nobody will take you serious. I leave you to logicboy, there's only so much foolishness I can tolerate from one person. You've been jumping from one post to another, trying to shift the burden of proof, failing that then creating false dichotomies and asking asinine questions. I don tire for your nonsense.

italo: Picture could be photo-shopped and if it isnt, you could have had a trans-gender surgery.

Why wont it count as reasonable doubt if I dismiss this "evidence?"

Besides, who decides what is "REASONABLE doubt?"

now I have to spell it out? Smh

Listen man, if I present a picture, it counts as evidence. If you think its not genuine, you have to prove it. If you do then you can say that the evidence is inconclusive or false BUT not that i'm not a man. Kapisce? Now the onus will be on me to provide conclusive evidence of my being a man. Maybe birth records, scans, or even my physical self for thorough examination.
Now italo, it will be patently fooolish for me to tell you that "I'M A MAN! If you disagree, prove that I'm not!"

As for reasonable doubt, better check what reasonable means in the dictionary. I cant continue to hold your hand like a 5 yr old.

Provide conclusive evidence for yahweh or forever shut the fork up.

Uyi Iredia: As said in the OP Deism is a phase to atheism. Atheism is beginning to look good to me. An immaterial God I'd as good as nothing.

What happened to the 35% Christianity?

italo: Who decides what is "evidence", "fact" and "proof beyond reasonable doubt?"

What some call proof, others dismiss as no-proof.

er...there's something called reasonable doubt, no?

Are you dumb or you're just making a special effort here?

If I say i'm a guy and you disagree. I then show you my fully nude picture with my pipi dangling, will that count as evidence? If you just dismiss so called evidence offhand, will that still count as reasonable doubt?

You have common sense, no?