MuttleyLaff's Posts

Nairaland Forum › MuttleyLaff's Profile › MuttleyLaff's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 (of 441 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: Is Woman Not From God by MuttleyLaff: 1:59pm On Sep 13, 2018*

Maamin:
At this point, well! it's your words against the bible's.

Job 2:1 ‎
Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.

Job 1:6
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.

Let me add this one even if you are denying them to be angels.

Job 38:7
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Its bible talk, not my words.
The bible has never had angels, whether fallen or not, called sons of God.
That's an undeniable fact

Do you know what "jagidijagan wuruwuru" to the answer means?
Havent finished with you about Job 38:7, yet you're bringing in Job 1:6 and Job 2:1,
Job 1:6 and Job 2:1 are your other two out of the three champion verses, where you've misunderstood what "sons of God" means in them

Do you remember me telling you, that Job 38:7 verse, happens to be one out of your three stars and champion verses, you were waving in Mobilia's face?

I also say let's deal with the Job 38:7 verse first, before going on to the other two (i.e. Job 1:6 and Job 2:1)
You earlier said: "I'm also learning myself."
Well guess what. By the time, we are done, do you know what apart from learning, you'll be getting?
It’s called getting an education

Maamin:
You erred greatly again by the above. but the scripture says otherwise.
Angels are called sons of God right before they fell.

Where and when were they called sons of God right before they fell?
Dont even try to quote here Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and/or Job 38:7 because you'll be making a grave mistake if you do

Maamin:
There are no problems whatsoever there, except the one you are making out right at this moment.
When that scripture was revealed it was not in Upper case or lower case it was simply just "son" .
The use of uppercase letters are just the formal way english intend to interpret the word grammatically.
Still no ambiguity.

The bold says it all..God never beget angels at any time. That is why Christ's Sonship is unique one of it kind and first of it kind.

When that scripture was revealed, was the "g" in God too, not in upper case or lower case, was the word simply just "god"?

You capital S in sons of God, writing it as Sons of God, instead of sons of God
Why, what are you playing at writing it that way?
What not write God, with lower or small letter case g?

Maamin:
The bold says it all..God never beget angels at any time.
That is why Christ's Sonship is unique one of it kind and first of it kind.

""For to which of the angels did He ever say:
"You are my Son; today I have begotten You"?
And again: "I will be to Him for a Father, and He will be to Me for a Son"?""
- Hebrews 1:5

Good that from Hebrews 1:5a, you accept that God never beget angels at any time
Now look at Hebrews 1:5b again, to see that God never had angels at any time be his son and/or Son

Maamin:
Is this the truth?
Now this is unequivocally laughable and amusing.

Laugh as best as you can
Meanwhile just remember that he who laughs last, laughs the best

Maamin:
So morning stars mean stars or the constellation?
And sons of God mean (sun and the moon) wow! Just wow!

All these just to avoid taking sons of God in Gen 6 as angels right? Well done sir!

How about this Rev.22 :16
"I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."

"And God made two great lights;
the greater light to rule the day,
and the lesser light to rule the night:
he made the stars also"
- Genesis 1:16

You behaving like a drowning man desperately clutching at whatever reed/straw is in sight, he can grab on, to stay afloat

I earlier reminded you that Context is King

Job 38:7, is a good 30-plus chapters faraway from Job 1:6 and Job 2:1

The meaning of sons of God in Job 1:6 and Job 2:1, isnt similar to the meaning of sons of God in Job 38:7

Job 38:7 is about God taking Job to task,
asking him about what he knows about creation and where was he during creation
and particularly when the sun, moon and the constellation in the Genesis 1:16 account were present

Maamin:
If God is father of light, then it makes even more sense that the Son(s) is/are the light (of the world).
We Christians are the light of the world Matth 5:14.

Believers (i.e. sons of God) and the Son of God (i.e. Jesus Christ) are
but unfortunately not and never were angels.
Sorry.

Maamin:
Other words for "Morning star" include "shinning one", "light bringer or bearer"

What dead on arrival point were you aiming to make with this remark?

Maamin:
So can I also say
"morning stars" = Angels
"Sons of God" = Angels ?

Capital NO!

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 8:36am On Sep 13, 2018*

LordReed:
Then why is it here?

Emergent phenomenon

LordReed:
So he is not powerful enough to stop it?

Stopping it will defeat the purpose(s)
Why not allow it to do its worst etcetera.

LordReed:
What type of being is he?

The type of being more than you can fully understand

LordReed:
LoL! I will indulge you in your fairytale explanation of a big bad monster.

I dont know where and how you got the idea of anyone explaining a big bad monster from
but if that keeps the smile on your face then continue to amuse yourself with it

LordReed:
So this your painter is unable to stop big bad monster from ruining his painting?
Such a rich story. LMFAO!

He who laughs last, laughs the best.
There is a method in the madness. LMFAO. Bwahahahaha ha.

LordReed:
Yeah it totally makes sense to eternally off people because they ate a fruit.
Such sanity from this guy.

What does "eternally off people" sic means?
Wasnt the name of the tree self-descriptive, that the fruit came from?
Wasnt a warning given about what will happen once the fruit is eaten?

I bet you're going to let me know you or other humans are incombustible.
Why not learn and know that, the word, eternally, is used to have a rhetorical effect

LordReed:
Yes if this is the best you think a rational being can aspire too.
If you cannot imagine a world without all of the suffering and misery, that's on you, I certainly can.
And given the powers attributed to this perfect being it would have been very very very possible.
But I guess when your brain is twisted by fairy tales,
making excuses for beings capable of perpetuating misery and suffering is par for the course.

I dont imagine it and that's because I know about it.

Dont be too much in a haste, there'll be world without all of the suffering and misery, soon or later.
Watch this page and dont blink, or else, you'll miss it. Kikikiki ki.

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 7:30am On Sep 13, 2018*

LordReed:
And he paints misery and suffering?
He paints disease, catastrophe and disaster?

He never painted misery and suffering or disease, catastrophe and disaster on His canvass.

You and I know how, when, where and why misery and suffering or disease, catastrophe and disaster got painted on His canvass

LordReed:
He paints a hell for eternal torment?

When are you going to re-learn that, hell means Sheol also known as grave
and that eternal torment is part of experience lusted after, as a result of eating off the TKG&E?

LordReed:
This from the mind of a perfect being?

I guess your mind is better
and/or you know another's mind thats better than the perfect Being's.

Christianity Etc › Re: Controversial Topic For NL Xtians by MuttleyLaff: 6:22am On Sep 13, 2018

Peacefullove:
Why are those dead in the sea not in hell ? Rev 20 vs 13

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it;
and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them:
and they were judged every man according to their works.

Spot that ?

"Many of those whose bodies lie dead and buried will rise up,
(e.g. Pharaoh and his army etcetera)
some to everlasting life and some to shame and everlasting disgrace."
- Daniel 12:2

Hell, in that verse is Sheol also known as grave.
So, Revelation 20:13 is saying, the sea and grave gave up their dead.

Christianity Etc › Re: My Nairaland Journey From Christianity To Atheism In Pictures. by MuttleyLaff: 5:19am On Sep 13, 2018

CoolUsername:
The Christians on this thread are so salty they remind me of my ex's cooking.

"You are the salt of the earth.
But what good is salt if it has lost its flavor?
Can you make it salty again?
(No) It will be thrown out and trampled underfoot as worthless."
- Matthew 5:13

"Salt is good for seasoning.
But if it loses its flavor, how do you make it salty again?
You must have the qualities of salt among yourselves and live in peace with each other."
- Mark 9:50

2 Likes

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 6:19pm On Sep 12, 2018

eventtinz:
Only one problem with the painting painter argument. This is the first and only one.

All that's required is the first and only one masterpiece

The painting didnt paint itself
The world is a canvass stretched before the Painter painted all that's from His mind on the canvass

Christianity Etc › Re: Is Woman Not From God by MuttleyLaff: 8:52am On Sep 12, 2018*

Seun:
Why would fallen angels be called sons of God?

Angels, whether fallen or not, are never called sons of God

Seun:
If that was the intended meaning, why did God inspire the writer to choose such a misleading and confusing term?

It was never intended to mean fallen angels nor confuse sons of God to be fallen angels

The term sons of God, right from the Book of Job have always been used for either two things.

Unfortunately, fallen angels aren't among the two things meant when the expression sons of God is used

Maamin:
You will have to tell me the very sin of these falling angels or Sons of God in Gen. 6

MuttleyLaff:
Did I notice you, in there above, capitalised the s, in sons of God?

Maamin:
Any problem with that?

"For to which of the angels did He ever say: "You are my Son; today I have begotten You"?
And again: "I will be to Him for a Father, and He will be to Me for a Son"?"
- Hebrews 1:5

Yes, there's fundamental problem
Actually there are loadsaproblems with that

Look at Hebrews 1:5 above, to see why there is/are problem(s) with that

Maamin:
Do I sense as if you are trying to read a whole new and a different meaning to Job 38:7?

You want the truth, don't you?
Well, then I'll give it to you, straight up.
Served ice cold, no shaking, no stirring.

Maamin:
What could the "sons of God" possibly mean there,
if not angelic hosts singing
and rejoicing during during the formation of the world?

Let's hear yours anyway!

"When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy"
- Job 38:7

Maamin, you and your "jagidijagan wuruwuru" to the answer ploy sha
So for your eyes, the imaginary angelic hosts, are altogether both morning stars and sons of God in Job 38:7?

Look brother, the sons of God, there, in Job 38:7, are the sun and the moon. No more, no less.
As for the morning stars (i.e. plural star), they, simply are a constellation

The constellation sang together, and the sun & moon shouted for joy

Do you know that God is called the Father of lights?
(i.e. Father of the constellation, the sun and the moon)

Context is King.
Re-read Job 38:7 in context, slowly and loudly,
then with God being the Father of lights in mind, come back with what you find

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 7:05am On Sep 12, 2018

budaatum:
You said they were behind the painting on the wall in a gallery. You ever been to the National Gallery? I suppose they can be sitting. I should have asked and not just assume. My bad.

Please Muttley, is the artist that is behind the picture in a gallery standing, sitting or laid down behind the picture?

If, I say who is behind the above mentioned post?

No one will say its, LordReed, or say no one but they will say its Budaatum
Its Budaatum who wrote the post so therefore was behind the post

Christianity Etc › Re: My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! by MuttleyLaff: 11:42pm On Sep 11, 2018

budaatum:
We will arrange properly next time.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/7753164_s774ghh8ff3qsd6_jpeg9af84775741d2097b3e212540e8a1ccc

1 Like

Christianity Etc › Re: My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! by MuttleyLaff: 9:39pm On Sep 11, 2018

budaatum:
Pig! I fasted today damn it!

Sheep rather, and not to be mistaken for sheeple
You could have safely broken the fast with me.

See. If you had said, I would have "sare keremọsa" told you to break it.

I dont usually flaunt menu pics or take pics of them.
I hate doing it and hated myself for doing those two

Things I get to do for country and you budaatum sha

1 Like

Christianity Etc › Re: My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! by MuttleyLaff: 8:39pm On Sep 11, 2018*

MuttleyLaff:
I'll paste here, what you missed.
Tomorrow is another day, my friend
budaatum setting off now, if you can make it
Its Squires and not Esquires

"Abula" - Before and After
Just got back in budaatum

Christianity Etc › Re: Is Woman Not From God by MuttleyLaff: 3:43pm On Sep 11, 2018*

Maamin:
Job 38:7 "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?"

I believe you are not by any chance thinking these sons of God are Sethites( The human godly race)?

The Contrast between the Son of God and daughters of men in Gen 6 can't be overlooked as ordinary humans. No!

I do remember saying, I am trying to get you see that the expression "sons of God" isnt exclusively used for animated spiritual or celestial beings.

Now tell, what are these sons of God, in Job 38:7?
Are they animated spiritual or animated celestial beings, also known as angelic beings?

This Job 38:7 verse, happens to be one out of your three stars and champion verses, you were waving in Mobilia's face, weren't you?

Let's deal with this one first, before going on to the other two, shall we.

I warn you in advance, bubbles will be burst.

Christianity Etc › Re: My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! by MuttleyLaff: 2:29pm On Sep 11, 2018*

budaatum:
Not gonna make it. Enjoy.

I'll paste here, what you missed.
Tomorrow is another day, my friend
budaatum setting off now, if you can make it
Its Squires and not Esquires

Christianity Etc › Re: Is Woman Not From God by MuttleyLaff: 2:26pm On Sep 11, 2018

Maamin:
hold on ..let me quote and answer each please.

The post is 99.9% a lot better now

Maamin:
spaghetti or macaroni ...
You already elongated it when you replied

You see the issue here, is that you want to get away with murder.
As much as I dont want to reply at length, I just needed to address some of the holes in your post.
There are too many to gaping holes to mention, so we have an elongated reply post

Maamin:
I'm kind of Busy these days ,
but i will answer them all..i just need time

Take your time, there isnt any need for rushed up post

I dont want to reply with a long post
so I'll look for your prominent point(s), likely going for two or three of them, if I wont do just one

Maamin, you did yourself in, when you agreed that sun and moon are addressed as sons of God

Now tell, what are the sons of God in Job 38:7, that happens to be one out of the three stars verses, you were waving in Mobilia's face?

I am trying to get you see that the expression "sons of God" isnt exclusively used for animated spiritual or celestial beings

You're not used to hyperboles and metaphors being used in the bible.
The bible does this quite a lot, like in this case,
using a figure of speech that directly refers to one thing (e.g. human beings) by mentioning another (e.g. celestial beings) for rhetorical effect.

I dont want slip into writing a lengthy post and getting information lost in it, so I'll for now, only post this much

Christianity Etc › Re: My Take On The Doctrine Of Trinity And Those Saying Jesus Is God Almighty! by MuttleyLaff: 1:03pm On Sep 11, 2018

budaatum:
See that word in bold? That's the issue, Prime.
You seem to mean 'have' as in a "Lord Lord".
While I am talking about a "do my will" sort of 'have'.
_Ref

Going to be at Esquire this evening for Naija Guinness and Abula anywhere aound 4:45-6:45 PM today.
Holler Muttley at the entrance to treat you to whatever they have you so desire

Christianity Etc › Re: Is Woman Not From God by MuttleyLaff: 12:03pm On Sep 11, 2018

Maamin tidy up the above post.
You turned it into a spaghetti post

1 Like 1 Share

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 5:25am On Sep 11, 2018

budaatum:
Artists stand behind their paintings?
QCan't wait to go behind to talk to Picasso!

There you go misrepresenting what I typed in order to fit whatever the agenda is.
I didn't use ''stand" at all in my remark.

1 Like

Christianity Etc › Re: Are Morality And Ethics Holding Back Science? by MuttleyLaff: 8:17pm On Sep 10, 2018

[img]https://s1/images/MuttMJpopcorn.gif[/img]
Y'all are fairkin wanking hilarious

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 12:11pm On Sep 10, 2018

LordReed:
LoL, stop engaging in stuff you cannot follow through. You say there is evidence, I say produce it then you ask what evidence? If you can't keep up with your own statements why do you bother to engage at all?

Your case is seeing a signed painting in an art gallery and still saying there is no artist behind the painting

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 2:15am On Sep 10, 2018

budaatum:
They get nowhere near my joy.
I'm just saddened by the ignorance.
It pains me so much.

#IfYouKnowYouKnowThings
If you know, you know
Who no know, no go know

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 12:41am On Sep 10, 2018

budaatum:
Some people have gotten on my nerves with their ignorance this weekend but I'm sure my mood would improve soon.

My better half, always says: "Dont let them steal your joy"

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 12:21am On Sep 10, 2018*

budaatum:
MuttleyLaff, are you pointion out my response to vaxx because he is blind and cannot see it himself?

Are you speaking in tongues?
What the fairk is "pointion"? LOL

Anyway, I know I am interested as vaxx is, to know your answer to the OP, stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt,
so just took the liberty to serve you same tune vaxx earlier played me

I was going to shout out to you, about if game, we meet and catch up at Esquires today's PM/tomorrow Tuesday PM
for abula", that's "amala dudu" or "lafun" plonked in a sea of ewedu, gbegiri and ọbe ata, yum yum yum
serenaded by a lot of all sorts of assorted orisirisi meats,
like shaki, pọnmọ, oxtail, raincoats, jackets, abọdi, fuku, liver, gbọkọtọ/cow leg etcetera,
but it seems you're moody and bad tempered at the mo
Or is it one of them man period things?

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 11:47pm On Sep 09, 2018

budaatum:
I was going to join the British Army a long time ago.
But when I asked myself if I could point a gun at someone and shoot, the answer was no, except if I were trying to save my life.
"But saving your life is what you'd be doing in the army", I reasoned.

But going somewhere to provoke and be a treat to someone else
whereby I have to protect myself by shooting at them is not exactly "saving your life now buda, is it?"
And that was army done for me. I just could not find the justification for pointing a gun at another human being
and pulling the trigger to shoot people that my presence might provoke, dead!
I sat an exam and passed so well that they kept calling and almost begged me to join till I literally told them to fuq off.
Then the British Police came asking me to join them!

I would assume anyone would morally and ethically justify weapons.
One just need listen to the arguments the NRA come up with when anyone says anything close to banning guns.
NRA members who can't continue justifying gun ownership would get rid of them,
but its very easy to avoid information that would stop them feeling the need to own guns.
And there's always the fear of what may happen if one does not have a gun which the news reinforces daily.
I'm very certain that wither n a few months of being in the army,
my brain would have been so washed that I too might have been justifying shooting people.
But knowing me, such acts would eventually be followed by very deep depression once I seriously
and honestly think about what I'd done. I'd probably commit suicide.

People can justify anything if they want to.
Whether what is justified is objectively justifiable is another thing entirely,
but that's not the question posed in this thread so I wouldn't start.
Subjectively, however, anything can be justified.
Murderers do it everyday.

vaxx:
Can you now answer the question @op

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 10:31pm On Sep 09, 2018

LordReed:
When you figure it out, call on me.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/7739160_dxod8xmw0ae5on9_jpeg_jpeg8e37ba4a61ed70dab54583346ae2c26a
Call on yourself, as I'll rather watch paint dry
or go pick up leaves off my lawn

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 10:28pm On Sep 09, 2018*

vaxx:
plurium interrogationum fallacy
(I sometime commit this too)well, have you heard ""He who kill the killer do not commit a sin""

A mosquito sucks my blood because it has to live while I am killing it in order to prevent it from transmitting live threatening diseases like dengue and malaria.
I think it is base on the struggle of existence that both of us are fighting for.
So yes This is will not be consider a question as to whether it is morally correct to kill a mosquito
or not but rather a question as to whether who wins this age old battle against my lethal 'enemy'.

Before you argue not all mosquito are dangerous, the one I fought last night is a criminal .....lol...

Can you now answer the question @op

Yes they can, based on the circumstances that brought the reason for the invention up.

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 9:45pm On Sep 09, 2018

vaxx:
Honestly, this names sound unfamiliar apart from Albert Einstein which I so much admire.
But that was unfortunate to hear they felt remorse for their invention, but it is normal for human to feel remorse on anything at all.
I just felt remorse for disloging some important issue with my friend today. I felt i should not have said it.
But will that be base on moral ground?

Have you heard of Arnold Sommerfeld, the German physicist who was responsible for introducing the azimuthal & spin quantum numbers.
He was nominated 84 times for noble laurel but never won, his doctorate students
and two of his post graduate students won the price but he never won.

Anytime I read or come across its work either in the journal or library, I do feel remorse for him as well.
Will you consider this as ethical and moral principle?
This are just side question, yet to answer the main topic.

vaxx, do you consider, it ethical and morally OK to swat a mosquito that's landed on your hand and sucking your blood

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Think Scientist Can Justify The Inventions Of Weapons That Can Kill And by MuttleyLaff: 8:58pm On Sep 09, 2018

vaxx:
Do you think scientist can ethically and morally justify the inventions of weapons that can kill and harm?

*What do you think*?

Let's exercise a civil and polite debate.....

I think this debate will favour and justify the war fought both in the bible and quran accordingly......since it is base on moral and ethical ground....

LordReed, budaatum and the rest........

Vaxx, have you familiar with the names Kamran Loghman, J. Robert Oppenheimer+Albert Einstein and/or Mikhail Kalashnikov
and how/why they felt remorse about their inventions?

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 8:30pm On Sep 09, 2018

LordReed:
Why always this tedious process of question and answer to stuff you are well aware of?

I dont know what you're with "always this tedious process of question and answer to stuff you are well aware of" talking about.
What secrets and/or issues of yours am I well aware of?

LordReed:
I guess someone else bearing MuttleyLaff wrote this or you forgot you wrote it?

If for the former, maybe my account was hacked
however about the latter, I didnt forget about what I wrote how I am, I just didnt know what evidence for the things you were asking for

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 7:35pm On Sep 09, 2018

LordReed:
LoL, see commentary. Maybe FIFA will hire you for the next World Cup.

When you have evidence for the things you claim hit me up.

I didnt know you're also a wannabe Brother Shaggi. Erh?.

What are you talking of now?
Evidence for what and/or which things claimed?

Christianity Etc › Re: Know Ye Not That Atheism Is Within You. by MuttleyLaff: 4:51pm On Sep 09, 2018

GoodMuyis:
Even the unreached barbarians who knew no civilization were found to be worshiping a deity.

Who thought them there is a supernatural being that must be worship?

With more than enough evidences, no one needs to be taught there is a supernatural being out and about

That's why the bible, says its only a fool, that will say there is no God
Only a fool will cross a busy road thoughtlessly
but a wise, will thoughtfully cross same busy road

Being called a fool, isnt said to denigrate the person called so
but making wrong decisions based on bad judgement and conclusions, adds up to be foolish, as opposed to being wise

LordReed:
Who taught them how to eat or how to farm?

GoodMuyis:
Common Sense Software[Firmware] installed by God from the beginning.
Genesis 1:29[NIV] - Then God said,
"I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.

Read also Genesis 3:17-19

I like the sound of this Common Sense Software [Firmware]
The table, chair, bed, stool, wardrobe etcetera are all in the tree
The pounded yam, asharo, dundun are all in the yam

LordReed:
So God made hoes and cutlass and gave it to them to farm with?

No, God didnt make hoes and cutlass and didnt give it to them to farm with

GoodMuyis:
Yes, if that is what you wanted to here.

C'mom, I know he can be a pain where the sun dont shine
but dont indulge him this way

LordReed:
LoL, like you don't need to lie now.

Whats your point, what are you driving at?

GoodMuyis:
I dont lie, even newborn infants were not thought that sucking will keep them alive.

Who lecture them that in the womb, Do you know?

LordReed:
Nobody lectures babies because it is innate, an evolved action.

It like breathing, is part of the existing in one from birth instincts and its instinctive for survival
The unlearned actions are needed for continuing to live or exist

LordReed:
Own the fact that you lied about hoes and cutlasses.
Since when has lying become the way in which you defend God?

Very simple fact, all tools and techniques useful to man was developed by man's own effort,
not by the intervention of any supernatural forces or alien assistance.

"As to these four lads, God hath given to them knowledge and understanding in every kind of literature, and wisdom;
and Daniel hath given instruction about every kind of vision and dreams."
- Daniel 1:17

You started well, then spoilt it with your fib
Now whose nose is this, because of the last sentence in the immediate above mentioned quote,
thats stretched through the window to come hit me from right where the poster is sat?

Apart from Daniel 1:17, please quietly review also Exodus 31:1-6, then do the rightful and needful to your post, you might need an ink remover

GoodMuyis:
Dalaman way of discussion.
Its not my fault if you cannot make a scant research while expecting me to do it for you and I refuse.

Very good succinct response

LordReed:
LoL, what research? You're full of bullshit.

Didnt know I'll get to amazingly read something like this.
Bullshit stain, flexing by deeming another, to be full of bullshit LoL

GoodMuyis:
You like rough play ba?

Shame, we dont get to see what the gif is about

LordReed:
I like facts.

You cant handle facts
I am yet to see, where trolls, like and can handle facts

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Know That A Christian Can Not Go To Hell even if he mistakenly sin by MuttleyLaff: 3:48pm On Sep 09, 2018

solite3:
www.nairaland.com/attachments/7740167_images_jpeg_jpegeb6c065c105cfe1af50da1aeadfb7a99

Aw, you're so sweet.
Though I didnt really mean it and wasnt being serious.
Thank you all the same
I wish I could see you, rub your chubby face together
and plant a kiss on it.

Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Know That A Christian Can Not Go To Hell even if he mistakenly sin by MuttleyLaff: 3:13pm On Sep 09, 2018

solite3:
OK mutty.

You can send me a thank you card wink

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 (of 441 pages)