₦airaland Forum

[b][/b]

Gbawe: For where? My brother, characters like him have nine lives they use for their AGIP shenanigans. He will be around holding brief for the next incompetent opportunist the PDP 'dashes' Nigeria. If GEJ proves unpopular enough by 2015, I expect the PDP to find another "humble" man who swam to school through shark-infested water and only ate once every 4 days.

......I expect the PDP to find another "humble" man who swam to school through shark-infested water and only ate once every 4 days.

^^^ Exactly!

dattaswami: You can thank God for providing the food. However you should not ask anything from Him.

Do not ask any thing from God which is either related to present or future. When you ask some thing in present or some thing in the future, it clearly means that you are reminding Him about the corresponding reaction that is to be immediately implemented in the need. This indirectly means that God is not alert as you are. This is insulting God. Due to such sin the requirement is not answered. If you are asking to protect yourself or somebody else, it indirectly means that He is not aware of the things to be done due to the irresponsibility and this also indicates that He is not as kind as yourself.

It means that God has potency to help but not kind enough to render the help. On contrary, it also means that you lack unfortunately the potency. It means if you fortunately have the potency you could have immediately responded and helped. Therefore, when ever you ask for anything it clearly means indirectly that God has some type of defect, which does not exist in your case. When you ask Him to fulfill the desire it looks as if that your desire is constitutionally justified. But God is not positively reacting due to either lack of positive response immediately or due to lack of knowledge of the constitution or due to lack of kindness to help the needy. All these points are very very subtle. But God is the most subtle and therefore, the knowledge of this analysis will certainly restrict you from asking any fulfillment of your desire.

Never bring present and future before God. Confine to the past always before God. Look back at your past life. Hundreds of incidents are there where you were helped by God. Even if you dispose some incidents through the incidental probability of success or through the efficiency of your efforts, certainly there are plenty of instances in which the help from God is clearly evident. At least remember those few incidents and express your gratefulness along praise to God for His kind help that was already done. The word Krutajnata means remembering the past help. Kruta means the past help done. Jna means identifying it by analysis. If you confine to praying the Lord and thanking Him always about the past helps from Him, the Lord will be immensely pleased. Then the present and future are spontaneously taken care of by the God. But do not adopt this technique with a mind that you will be helped by God in the present and in the future by following this procedure!

You should really follow this path and you should really forget the present and the future. When large number of people came to hear the message from Jesus, they were hungry by the noon. This point was brought to the notice of Jesus. He never asked God to provide food for those hungry people who came to hear God’s word. Had He asked for that, He would have insulted God. God knows His responsibility very well towards the devotees who came there to hear about Him. God has the power to fulfill His responsibility even in the last fraction of second. Had Jesus told God to bless the devotees with food, it clearly means that God is not as kind as Jesus. Jesus never asked for any thing. He came to know that there were four breads. He took them and showed to sky. He thanked God for providing those four pieces of bread.

Immediately the present was responded and the four breads became four thousand breads. This application of analysis is limited to Nivrutti only. You should not extend this to Pravrutti. When you are hungry you have to beg the other souls because they are not omniscient to know that you are hungry. Pravrutti and Nivrutti should never be mixed.

How did U pass previous examinations? U didn't even answer d simple question.U should av at least,answer d question first.

#A lil advice for U#
Whenever U want to write an exam,first of all write d relevant answers before U pour any excess knowledge or irrelevance.The worst d marker could do,is to mark what he needs and cancel out d remaining jargons.This could be ur saving grace,so take this advice seriously.Cheers!!!

Classicalman: Cossy Orjiakor, repent and give yourlife to Christ. Start by deflating those fake baloons and wearing more decent clothing.

Women and jealousy,so,because U got no t.its means anyone that has gotten it big has silicon implanted in it? And what proof do U av that they are inflated? Nonesense!!!!

tomakint: A lady tutored you on your own shiiit,and the next thing, you wanna flex your tiny muscle on me! Sorry pal, my response to your pathetic post is simply; 'take your d'banj hyping somewhere else' my ears have heard the best of tunes!!

How can someone with a very big problem with simple logical reasoning be a tutor? Well,being a coward that U are,U av decided to take to ur heels as usual. Atleast,U were intelligent enough to know that U are fighting a loosing battle.Ur guideline must av been d proverb,"If U can't stand d heat,don't stay in d kitchen".Infact,d statement, 'Ur ears av heard d best of tunes' validates d myopic,egocentric and prejudiced view U av wrt music.Even,the likes of Ludwig Van Beethoven,Yanni Chrisomalis etc that av composed,played and listened to a lot of great music couldn't av said that,their ears I've heard d best of tunes.U just confirmed that,U are a rookie when it comes to music and U know nothing on it.Maybe Safarigirl had been ur tutor all these wyl.I am not surprised anyway,"Like tutor,like student" and d rest follows. Case Closed!

Dimples 316: @ Naturalwaves

My NL oga I hail thee,(I'm making you my oga for now as you adviced that I reconsider my take on marriage. LOL)

Dimples 316: I see you are going at it with candieangel. There's logic in your argument too,

Thank U.

Dimples 316: but common is marriage for the sole purpose of bearing children and doing so in good time before we hit menopause? I don't think so and you know me now, am all for adoption, adoption, adoption if you can't have children of your own OR if like me you want children out of wedlock but do not want to fornicate to have them. Remember God is working in us giving us both the desire and power to do what pleases Him (Phillipians 2:13). So my desire for a child out of wedlock via adoption may just be God's desire at work within me. Well at least I believe it is. Oh and by the way there's nothing wrong with my womb I can have children out of it just saying in case you think.............

Ofcourse NO,marriage is not for d sole purpose of giving birth before menopause.It is just advisable for those that intend giving birth to do that on time wrt the health report so that the following can happen;
1)To reduce d health dangers inherent in late conceptions(birth defects etc)
2)To boost d chances of working more with certainty rather than probability.
You know ur own case is different as U may consider an Adoption but for anyone that is considering giving birth,it is only advisable to do that early if not for anything,at least,based on medical reports.
The last part of ur statement(D WOMB PART) got me laughing.
Finally,thanks for being a good moderator on this thread.lolz...U deserve an award for PEACE.[/quote]

dlex21: nah..

Letter B.B for BROAD.
Letter W too. W for WIDE.

[quote author=Mrs..Chima]Went off topic would be talking about Biafra war...biology is PART OF MEN AND WOMEN.

Consult a dictionary. You lost.[/quote]Hahahahahaha.....D off topic I was referring to was when U started discussing issues partaining to societal norms which tends to claim that males are superior not ur Biological point of view.Ur biological point of view was not off topic in a way but d former was completely off topic.

@OP and MODS,Change the construction of d topic.It seems something is missing from that sentence.

tomakint: My guy sorry if I am rude on this but to be honest, that babe really 'tutored you' on how to make good judgment on music, in as much that we have different tastes in music, you should at least be able to note what i called 'crap' at your level! Cool down and read this then see how you can get it to your, 'gra gra master':

Thank God for Femi Kuti, Tuface, Nneka and clearly the real Amazon, Asa still holding forte at the International Scene with steady successes! This clown (D’banj), with his gra gra no go let person rest, we all know those who are pulling the strings musically as far as Naija is concerned. You can’t even figure out his genre of music, very unstable. Today he go sing naija hip hop, tomorrow he go say he is on afrobeats, next time na pop, after a while you go hear jujupop, the next thing ijala ere ode (oyato), may be he go soon sing reggae for us. Oliver twist is yet to sell 150,000 copies and the guy no go let man rest, and some of his dogs on this forum (Rhino.5dm, airmark etc) keep crying and kicking that people are not seeing their ‘koko-master’ prowess. It’s not up to 5 months the real ‘Don’ Don Jazzy left him, we don dey see im fucck up. Instead make him sit down jeje think of what to do with the little money he is getting now for the unforeseen future, he wants to ‘penetrate’ American, British, Japan, Australian and European Markets with his ‘piece of craps’ wey never conquer Nigeria let alone Africa……gra gra master, remember Majek Fashek and learn before it’s too late!!! My guy D'banj is simply 'absolute crap' no offense! Listen to good music in the 80s may be that will improve your listening skills, My Point!

And how does this entire trash justify the reasons for d unwarranted INSULTS thrown at D'banj by Safarigirl under d guise of making a criticism? .

U lack basic communication skills,U quoted me and d next thing U did was to go completely off points.Weren't U taught d essence of quotations? Although,U made use of ur fingers in typing,d brain is meant to run it and not d other way round woman wrapper.If U don't av anything to say to a post,never quote it.if U want to make ur own fresh points,paste it seperately and I will give U a solid reply and if that point(s) of urs is this trash U wrote up here,paste it seperately and I will tutor U on what is crap and what is not wrt music.
I hope U av sent a PM?

[quote author=Mrs..Chima]Recycled ramble.[/quote]First,U went off topic .Even though U went off topic,U said men and women are biologically d same and none is more complex than d other. I brought U back on track and told U that,Superiority is different from Complexity(which u seem to confuse initially) and even at ur biological argument,I gave U glaring examples to show that,women are more biologically complex than men and d best U could do was to label it a RECYCLED RAMBLE.SMH.I come across funny people everyday and U are no exception.Infact,what U just exhibited is another proof of d feminine complexity.

[quote author=Mrs..Chima]How the hell men and women wired differently when we share the same rib Society and cultures play a big part in division between men and women. Society want people to think that men are stronger so therefore they should be the provider and women are nurturer so therefore they should be the homemaker.

There are men who are incapable of tending to the fields for whatever reasons....shouldn't the women sit around and mope because the man can't tend to the field? Accordingly to you men and women are wired differently....biologically speaking men and women are the same even can share similar hormone chemicals....PLEASE DO NOT DEBATE ON THE SUBJECT OF BIOLOGY....you will lose.

It is all societal bullshit and as I stated men and women are no different. You have some men who do not bleed act worse than women on their periods!!!![/quote]Ur post above is talking more about d societal norm that men are superior over females but that is different from complexity.The Complexity seems to address d issue that,trying to understand a woman could be challenging.That's all!

Talking about Biology(though that's not our main focus), Do U know that a woman is even more biologically complex than a man? From d structural make up,to biological activities(e.g ovulation),conception,womb etc.A female's body is generally sensitive and more complex than a male's.A man is just a simple figure.That's biological complexity! There are other forms of female complexity.

candieangel12: A woman will have kids when the time is right and when she is able to take care of her children, there is no need into rushing into marriage for the sake of childbirth. If a woman knows she wants many children then yes, she should marry and start having children earlier like my mother who had all 6 of us before she clocked 35 but if a woman, for example me, wants only 1 or 2 children then what is the rush? I can only speak on my behalf because I am not against early marriage but early marriage and early child bearing is not for me. Yes having a child when one is above 35+ can lead to defects but with all the technology and the right pre-natal care, this likelihood diminishes. And maybe you forgot that it is not only women that cause fertility issues and high risks pregnancy, the man can be just as much to blame. So don't go pointing fingers at women. This is the 21st century and you guys need to get more educated on this issue instead of claiming myopic views. Be it 20 or 40, a woman should marry when she finds the right man and when she is ready to handle the responsibilities that come with being a wife and mother. No one should rush into marriage because that would be a mistake one will regret. There is more to life than all this marriage nonsense. Let's just leave it at this, I'm tired of stressing out that marriage should be done when one feels ready. Let's agree to disagree because all this head butting will get us nowhere. No one can change my views, I am just giving my own opinion to the females on here that think their lives are over because they are single and 30.

Okay,ur point is well understood.Particularly in ur own case where U are considering just an issue or maybe two.All d best! Like U rightly said,we disagree to agree.Goodnight!

[quote author=Mrs..Chima]Understanding men is just as complex as understanding women.

People need to keep it real.[/quote]Women and men are wired differently and people with authority in d field of psychology says women are more complex to understand and handle from various researches carried out . Even women know that they are indeed complex.Men are not as complex as women.No basis for comparism atall.

Just a funny excerpt below that depicts a form of female complexity for some fun;

1. (Whatever)

Men: What should we have for dinner?
Women: Whatever..
Men: Why don't we have Mexican?
Women: No not Mexican, the last time I got pimples on my face
Men: All right, why don't we have Szechwan cuisine
Women: Yesterday we ate Szechwan, today too?
Men: Hmm..... I suggest we have seafood
Women: Seafood is not good, I got diarrhea
Men: Then what do you suggest?
Women : Whatever..

2. (Anything)

Men: So what should we do now?
Women: Anything
Men: How about watching a movie? It's been a long time
Women: Watching movie is no good, it's a waste of time
Men: How about we go for bowling, or some exercises?
Women: Exercise on such a hot day?
Men: Then find a cafe and have a drink
Women: I am off caffeine
Men: Then what do you suggest?
Women: Anything

3. (You decide)

Men: Then do we just go home?
Women: You decide
Men: Let's take the bus, I will accompany you
Women: The bus is dirty and crowded.
Men: OK; we will take a cab
Women: Not worth it... For such a short distance
Men: All right, then we can walk. We can enjoy the weather
Women: I am hungry, can't walk.
Men: Then what do you suggest?
Women: You decide
Men: Let's have dinner first?
Women: Whatever...
Men: What shall we eat?
Women: Anything..

queensmith: Not at all, that was an outline but the conclusion still holds. There is no automatic translation in disease there are only indicators, ones we can assign to causative epidemiology.

When I said,'automatically translates',I was referring to ur point and not d disease(lolz) even though U understood what I meant.It's ok.Since U claim that ur conclusion (cancer is a disease of affluence) still holds.Can U pls explain to me,ow cancer is a disease of affluence? Tnx.

queensmith: You can't read, I didn't write anywhere there I carried out research, and if you read the argument well you will see that point was in response to Dankas claims the americans are spreading cancer through Africa.
I don't even want to indulge you with the rest of the nonsense you have posted since you quoted wikipedia, thats evidence enough to me I shouldn't bother wasting my time. But do read over what you quoted again, the use of the word CERTAIN!! look that up in the dictionary, and revise your argument.

Oh,sorry about that(research).U made mention of d fact that U av studied on it or something in ur previous post.Atleast U claim to av a knowledge in it.
If I may ask,what is wrong in reading and quoting wikipedia for a basic knowledge? From what I read about cancer on it,there was no place that it was stated that cancer is only a disease for d rich.Let's not shy away from d main point.How can U justify ur claim that cancer only affects d rich when we av poor people dying from it as well day by day?It is that explanation I want from U cos that was d part of ur argument that caught my attention.U're d first person that I've heard that from.Pls explain.Tnx!

MuhMubRaj: Naturalwaves bet y?

Just joking

^^^ I'm a seconder!

candieangel12: Yeah Yeah, you have it all wrong. I said a woman's fertility decreases when they reach 35+, you are saying that it decreases at 30+. I read the article and I know all about that stuff and the article is clearly stating that a woman begins to have fertility issues around 35+...so what's the big deal about marrying and having children between 30-35? Still, everyone's case is different...there are still very fertile women in their early 40s just as there are very infertile women in their 20s. So what is your point and what is it that I am wrong about? Maybe you didn't read your so called article very clearly and maybe you didn't read the women's comments on the article, one had her 1st child at 32 and the other is 40 years old and pregnant. So, again I ask what is your point? You still make no sense to me.

If U read my post well,U will see that,I said a woman who gets married at 30+ will give birth THROUGH 35+( most likely) xcept if she wants just an issue.
A woman's fertility declines with increasing age and a woman starts having fertility problems from 35+ according to d article .U forgot d fact that 30+ means any age from 30 upwards and U quickly concluded that d woman will av kids btw d ages 30-35.What if she gets married at 34 or 33 and she wants to av like 3 children? Won't she span d age 35 in d process?Or won't d children be spaced atall? If a woman spans 35 years and report has it that women from that age tend to av fertility problems,that means there is d probability of the woman aving such problems? That's d point!
Won't it be logical for one to try and av kids when there is a great chance for fertility rather than wait till when or close to when medical professionals say fertility starts declining.Y put one's self under probability when there is a phase for certainty (all things being equal).That's d point! Moving away from medicine and theories,I av seen countless examples of couples who got married late and their major challenge always seem to be d ability or difficulty in conceiving in which d major diagnosis was that d wife is not very fertile as xpected due to advancing age.
Moreover,U didn't talk about d point in d link I gave U that said 'there is a higher risk of giving birth to children with Down's syndrome,Edward's syndrome,Patau's syndrome and d likes in women that wait till such advanced ages'?.This means that,aside d fertility problem,there is also a probability of giving birth to a faulty product.
Considering all these,won't it be rather advisable to play safe and av kids at an earlier age?

dlex21: for what nah?

To flog U ofcourse

tomakint: Right on point dear!! Right on point, everyone cannot like trash! I am yet to familiarise myself with D'banj genre of music seriously! Well like you rightly said, 'let's leave them in their ignorance'!

See this funny dude,queueing behind a lady to make his points. U behave like a coward.Anyway,it is not bad if U don't feel someone or like someone's genre.That's Y we av numerous Artistes and different genres to chose from and it is not a crime also to make fair criticisms and fault someone's move when U feel otherwise.That fair criticism is what Safarigirl has failed to do.U don't make fair criticisms by calling someone a TOUT or USELESS when there is no cause for such.

candieangel12: Your argument isn't very legit. A woman in her 30s has the same chance as a woman in her 20s to give birth to a healthy child. Seriously, all you people saying a woman 30+ poses a greater health risk to fertility issues have some misconceptions. Are you guys doctors or what? This is a common lie that Nigeria feeds to our young women and that is why most of them are rushing into marriage when they are not ready. A woman's fertility decreases slightly from 35+ and it decreases a lot by 40+. There are many women that have children well into their late 30s early 40s, for example Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez. Tyra Banks and Gabrielle Union are in their late 30's, childless and not married. They both said they want children some day but even though they're clocks are ticking for them, they are not running to the nearest alter to get married or have kids out of wedlock. They are taking their time till the time is right for them. In this day age, with all the technology, a woman in her 50s can even have children. Does early marriage guarantee children? Some women that have been married for years are still childless, so please this whole 30+ years shenanigins is nonsense. A woman will have children when it God's time, be it 20 or 45.

U got it all wrong.A woman whose age is advanced has a lower fertility rate than a younger one and women who starts aving kids from 30+ will give birth through 35+ if such women want to av more than a kid.It was also reported that children with downs syndrome and other types of birth abnormalies were given birth to mostly by women whose ages are advanced.Here is a proof.U may like to read this;
http://www.babycentre.co.uk/pregnancy/antenatalhealth/ageandpregnancy/

Elebiju: He is too busy banning teamgarri

Lmao .He go ban U ooo

nagoma: Ruptured appendix is an emergency that can actually be treated in nigeria. Where i blame the Villa Doctors is their failure to diagnose appendicitis. Appendicitis is basically a clinical diagnosis that can be done by any NYSC Doctor. Needing no magnetic resonance imaging or similar technology.
Why they failed to make the correct diagnosis , I believe is because the Doctors are also adulators and sychophants like many others in corridors of power.
Food poisoning and Appedicitis have common cardinal early symtoms of nausea, abdominal pain and vomiting. The only way to make a quick differentiation is to UnCloth the patient , lie him /her on his/her back, and examine the abdomen in detail and you will elicit the signs that will lead you away from food poisoning and to appedicitis as a firm diagnosis. These courtier palace doctors were too shy and did not have the professional courage to tell Dame Patience to UnCloth and for them to dip their hands into her (abdomen) stomach. So they continued wrongly treating her for food poisoning on the basis of syptoms alone. Until the inflamed appendix ruptured.
No body will confirm this but I strongly believe that is what led to the crisis - adulations and fake reverence.THere is no sustitute for standards in clinical diagnosis - even when the patient is rich and powerful.

Well said.

hardbody: However i did not know that the real reason why people have children, is, according to you to take care of them when they start aging. Honestly in my world, i had grown out of that mindset. My parents have enough investments not to bother about what i am able to do for them, and i am growing mine to ensure i do not rely on children to take care of me.

You av missed d point completely.Taking care of one's parents is not about money alone.There are so many things that a child can do for a Parent aside cash.D presence of one alone at old age is enough.Even if U av enough cash to hire maids and all staffs on planet earth,d place of a child can never be taken.Who will take over all ur investments when u finally die? Families?,relatives? Government? And U will watch all U've worked hard for to just go off so cheaply like that without imparting directly into anyone to take over .If d owners of great investments didn't av children,some of d companies will not be standing till date.Infact,d process of modelling and tutoring a child from infanthood to adulthood is great fun.So,U see,aving a child to take care of one is not solely about financies.No one can take d place of a child.

queensmith: the higher incidence of certain cancers in Western regions shows us that it is a disease of affluence

.

FALLACY!!!!!!! U mean to say that;d fact that there is a higher incidence of certain cancers in western regions,automatically translates to d fact that d disease is a disease of affluence? Read what U wrote again and listen to urself.By ur argument,there shouldn't be cases of cancer in Africa then.Do U know ow many cases of cancers that are diagnosed in Nigeria on a daily bases? I lost a family friend to one this year.U claimed to av carried out a research.I hope ur research was not done in d corners of ur bedroom.U didn't find out that several types of cancers are dominant in certain regions? E.g gastric cancer is more common in Japan due to high salt intake.Colon cancer is d most common in USA,cancers spread thru diseases and infections is most common in Africa which carries about 25% of such.Maybe U did research like U said but d research failed to pass through U. End ur overall ignorance and start from d link below.It will do U a lot of good to start from there.Here it is;
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer

^^^^ Okay but I got to get my cane now.

[quote author=o.obim]Hahahaha!Now u feel what 'em girls feel when u tell them that nt marrying at 30 is a shame.I'm a millionaire,building my own house n aint 30 yet.Shame on u for nt owning a house at 30.Ladies,ds shud b d question u ask any stewpid man who ask u why u stil single at 30;'why aint u living in a mansion at 30'[/quote]Ur argument is so baseless and meaningless.U are comparing A WOMAN,whose period of fertility has an expiry period with WEALTH/ MONEY that has no deadline and can be made at any time.I wonder ow U made ur millions with this type of brain(no offence,just wondering).Did U get urs thru inheritance or U got fixed into a good job by a top gun? U shuld find it a lil bit tough passing a 'SHL test' with this type of reasoning.I hope Ur millions is legitimate anyway? Don't U know that women who get married around 30+ stands a great health risk and fertility problem? Except if such woman won't be giving birth.Didn't U see LEOBREEZY'S post where he gave some useful advices about what women who want to get married ASAP can start doing to increase d chances? But U were too sentimental to see that.U've forgotten that a lot of people will read all these posts even though just few of us are making comments,so,whatever U say,will go a long way.Though,I'm not in support of asking a lady Y she is not married,asking them to reciprocate such questions with 'Y are U not living in a mansion' or 'Y are U not a millionaire' will only compound things.U may give another advice.I know U can do better.

safarigirl: Pay no mind to the D'banj apologists, when you're blinded by a cause, everyone against is termed a 'hater'. I have chosen to leave them in their state of delusion like their master. Arguing with them is like trying to tell a defiant blind man the true colour of his clothes.

You don't hate him yet U called him a TOUT and U said he is useless.No sane person.I repeat,no sane person will ever do that except if such person already has a prejudiced view.This is simple logic and common sense.Ow do U xplain urself? If U can't explain that,just save urself d shame and stop making further comments.D more U try to justify d fact that u only made a fair criticism,d more S.T.UPID U sound. It is so obvious U are d one in a state of delusion. U can't expect everyone here to be as D.AFT as U.No,we can't all be a DUMMY VARIABLES.
By now,U should know that,whenever U want to make a post,U will think twice and reread ur post before U spill RUBISH!. U think U can just post nonsense and get away with it? No my dear.

I do not know what the most complex thing is but one complex thing I know of is WOMEN.

candieangel12: My age mates that are married with children have so much more responsibility, I wouldn't be able to deal with it all. I love the fact that I don't have a husband to answer to or children to take care of.

This shows that U are not even matured enough to get married.The responsibilities of being married seems to scare U such that U feel U are incapable.So,wen are U gonna get responsible wrt marriage?

candieangel12: When I come back from school, I just chill with my friends or go partying or anything fun. I love it that way and I would not have it any other way

And how long is the fun going to continue? With d way U've been sounding all through, u look like someone that will even be so afraid to pass through the process of a child delivery.My dear,life is not all about career and fun(everyone loves fun).If not,men will not even get married atall.We can just av kids outside wedlock,date numerous women and live life to d fullest.There are some certain responsibilities that comes with difft ages. In d words of SHIZZLE11,when U finally make up ur mind to stop d fun and get more serious,DONT LEAVE IT TOO LIL,TOO LATE. Cheers!!!

Dimples 316: @ Naturalwaves.

We are cool , but I really don't know what you want me to reconsider. I am not aversed to marriage neither do I hate it. I just don't feel a desire for it and am not desperate because I've turned 29.

Does this mean U could get married someday? If yes,then U already av a lil rethink atleast,U are not outrightly cancelling out the possibility of a marriage even though d probability is so so so so slim with respect to U.Just like what SHIZZLE11 has said,if d converse happens,DON'T MAKE IT TOO LIL,TOO LATE. Cheers!!

@MRBROWNJAY, That was a lovely write up even though it was quite funny.I'm sure U'lld av saved a lot of people from dipping their hands in fire.

@Leobreezy,nice write up too.A lot of persons can learn one or two things from ur post.