₦airaland Forum

you all don't know how to answer questions instead you change the subject of discussion from the original topic. It's not something that surprises me because this mental slowness is a characteristic of your path.

My point is

Abraham and all the prophets after him and before him called to the same monotheistic creed that the last of the Messengers - Alys missolaat wassalaam - called to. Even Jesus himself was referred to as teacher during his lifetime.

It is that criminal called Paul that innovated this trinity doctrine which is alien to the way of the Prophets. And it is similar to the same erroneous and misguided creeds of the pagan Greece and Rome who say Zeus married a mortal woman and begot half human and half god i.e Hercules who was later raised to Olympus.

So, Islam is not the religion of Muhammad neither is it the religion of the Arabs. Rather it is the path of all prophets.

So if you want to give a reasonable answer, what y'all will do is to prove that Abraham and the prophets before and after him all preached trinity or at least a verse where Jesus himself expressly states that he himself should be worshiped.

As for these questions that you're asking, I won't answer for two reasons:

first; It would be tantamount to digression from the original topic. And I won't be as unwise as you are to indulge in such.

second; this is not the first time you are raising these points and enough energy has been used in explaining matters to you. I believe that the one who has any intellect should have found satisfaction in those answers but you disbelievers are as the Quran described you... rather they are an arguing people.

jcross19:
islam is idle worshipping even confirm in the bible in ezekiel 8 vs 16. That depict who allah. Islam is evil before God , desist and give your life to christ.

Sheer stubbornness. no wonder a single atheist will not find any difficulty in crushing 50 Christians!

Ovacoma:
Lies and deceit as expected. But, quran calls muhamad d first muslin.

Quran refers to the last Messenger -alyhissolaat wassalaam - as the first Muslim and Moses also as the first Muslim, and even Ibrahim as the first of the Muslims.

The meaning of first here is relative first i.e first Muslim in my era or location. Every messenger is the first Muslim in his era and place.

Then you should quote where that is stated.

As for your claim that what I've said is lies and deceit then it's nothing but a mere claim that is backed by no argument or proof, therefore it is equal to the braying of an arse.

So, I recite the verse unto you [say (oh Muhammad alyhissolaat wassalaam to these disbelieving folks) bring forth your evidence if indeed you are truthful]

omokoladele:
May Allah have mercy on us and forgive us our sins.

To me I see nothing wrong in it.

You must be a Sheikhah to have said that!

Anyway please mention your proof for it.

note: you should mention a scholar that has your opinion also because your personal opinion is of little or no importance.

Allah informed us in the Quran that He created the heavens and earth. and created therein the human, jinn, and angels.

The humans and jinns have freewill to choose between good and evil, belief and disbelief but angels can't disobey.

Therefore it would be a great injustice for me not to mention that just as there are righteous humans, there are also righteous jinns as mentioned in the Quran. However, this is not a proof for those criminal alufa that worship the jinns by slaughtering for them, invoking them etc.

That is why we would that all these claims of UFO are the handiwork of the jinns playing with the mind of the people.

True they might have seen this creatures in reality but it is the demons that are playing with their intellects by changing forms and shape. The same explanation goes for these bush baby and claims of seeing the dead.

rahymat:
im used to getting called wen am sleeping either by my parents or my siblings nd i always wake up to answer them but today dad went out nd i was alone in d house so i slept suddenly i heard dad voice coming from his room calling my name i answered nd i went to his room bt i was shocked to see nobody there.i even looked for his car around bt it was no where to be found so i asked our guard abt his whereabout he said he hasnt returned.im neither dreaming nor hallucinating because dats dats hw i usually wake up wen he call me nd it was from his room i heard his voice.so i want to ask whether anybody has experienced dis before as its completely strange to me.

My advice to you as a Muslim.

Firstly increase in dhikr especially those of the morning and evening and the dh"ikr of going to bed and waking. Many people are negligent of these prayers. Buy the book citadel of the believer it should suffice in shaa Allah.

it could be the jinns (demons) that are disturbing you and trying to cast fear in your heart so that you will seek assistance from their friends (magicians and soothsayers) and eventually push you into disbelief. Reciting suratul baqarah chases the demons from the house as the Messenger said the jinns don't stay in a house which baqarah is recited.

secondlyl

try to seek medical assistance, it is not right to always make everything seem spiritual.

thirdly,

please don't make the mistake of visiting any of those religious criminals i.e pastor and those alufa that call themselves Alfa! not to talk of babalawo. They will take advantage of you and even complicate your problem.

The sunnah is to call on Allah directly without any intermediaries. I pray that Allah rectifies your affairs and increase you in steadfastness.

Islam came first because the Monotheistic creed of Islam is what Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and even Jesus (peace be upon them all) practiced.

Christianity was formed by Paul -the criminal - who was a Jew and enemy of Christ in his lifetime then claimed to have been inspired by a 'spirit' to preach trinity.

This trinity doctrine is alien to the Prophets of God and is very similar to the misguided creeds of the pagan Greece and Rome who say Zeus married a mortal woman and begot half human and half god i.e Hercules.

Even Britannica mentions that Jesus was more likely to have been known during his lifetime as a teacher and not one of three.

This type of deviation is not peculiar to christians alone, it is something common to all messengers that after their demise many of their followers will deviate from the true teachings they left. Usually, a bit of this deviation appeared in the lifetime of the messengers and they would warn against it only for the followers to return to it after their demise.

examples:

The Jews deviated from Moses' teaching from his lifetime by worshipping the calf, then he warned them against it. After his demise they returned to disbelief and murdered a lot of messengers and even attempted the murder of Jesus!

Jesus forbade his followers from worshipping him during his lifetime stating that he was nothing but a teacher only for most of them to follow Paul and his innovated trinity doctrine which was strange to the path of the messengers.

Muhammad - alyhissolaat wassalaam - only came to complete the message of those before him.

And as usual the people have deviated a lot from his teachings.
Worship of grave, excessive veneration of righteous men till they raised them to divine status e.g the shia worship the grave at karbala.

Killing of people and tagging it jihad, one great indicator of the falsehood of these jihadists is that they kill Muslims, attack mosques and most importantly they do not have any scholar among them. They are not guided by knowledge except spontaneous combustion of emotions.

134741: What is the ruling on offering congratulations on Friday?

What is the ruling on offering congratulations on Friday, because now it is the custom in our country on Friday to send text messages and people congratulate one another on the occasion of Friday by saying “Jumu‘ah mubaarak” or “Jumu‘ah tayyibah.”.
Published Date: 2011-04-07

Praise be to Allaah.
Firstly:

There is no doubt that Friday is an “Eid” or “festival” for the Muslims, as it says in the hadeeth narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “This is a day of ‘Eid that Allah has ordained for the Muslims, so whoever comes to Jumu‘ah, let him do ghusl, and if he has any perfume let him put some on, and you should use the miswaak.” Narrated by Ibn Maajah, 1098; classed as hasan by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah.

Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allah have mercy on him) said, describing the special virtues of Friday:

Thirteen: It is a day of ‘Eid that is repeated every week.

Zaad al-Ma‘aad, 1/369

Thus the Muslims have three Eids: Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, which come once every year, and Jumu‘ah which is repeated once every week.

Secondly:

With regard to the Muslims congratulating one another on the occasions of Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, this is prescribed and it is narrated from the Sahaabah (may Allah be pleased with them). This has been discussed previously in the answers to questions no. 49021 and 36442. As for congratulating one another on the occasion of Friday, what seems to us to be the case is that it is not prescribed, because the fact that Friday is an Eid was known to the Sahaabah (may Allah be pleased with them), and they were more knowledgeable than us about its virtues, and they were keen to respect it and give it its due, but there is no report to suggest that they used to congratulate one another on Fridays. And all goodness is in following them (may Allah be pleased with them).

Shaykh Saalih ibn Fawzaan (may Allah preserve him) was asked: What is the ruling on sending text messages every Friday and ending with the phrase “Jumu‘ah mubaarak”?

He replied:

The early generation did not congratulate one another on Fridays, so we should not introduce anything that they did not do.

End quote from Ajwabat As’ilah Majallat al-Da‘wah al-Islamiyyah.

A similar fatwa was issued by Shaykh Sulaymaan al-Maajid (may Allah preserve him), when he said:

We do not think it is prescribed to exchange congratulations on Fridays, such as saying to one another, “Jumu‘ah mubaarak” and so on, because it comes under the heading of du‘aa’s and dhikrs, which must be based on a text (of the Qur’aan or Sunnah) because this is purely the matter of worship and if it were good, the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and his Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) would have done it before us. If anyone suggests that this is permissible, then that may imply that it is prescribed to say du‘aa’s and congratulate one another after having done the five daily prayers and other acts of worship, and du‘aa’ at these times was not done by the early generations.

End quote from the Shaykh’s website (may Allah preserve him)

http://www.salmajed.com/ar/node/2601

If a Muslim prays for his brother on Friday with the intention of softening his heart and making him happy, and seeking the time when supplications are answered, there is nothing wrong with that.

And Allah knows best.

Anyone who has a contrary scholarly opinion may do so by quoting do scholar who has the opinion then his arguments. May Allah put barakah in our lives.

unphilaz:
So judging ISIS, it means WHAT they are doing IS foolishness... abi?

Of course! Because one major condition for jihad is that it must be under the flag of a recognized Islamic Republic or government.

truthman2012:
See how you reason.

If Our Spirit means angel Gabriel, why should capital 'S' be used? Do you use capital for an angel's spirit?

If it was angel Gabriel that ''Our Spirit'', was referring to, was it angel Gabriel that assumed a perfect man called Jesus ?

A desperate attempt at making a point.

There's no capital letter in Arabic, and the capital letter I used is either unconsciously or to call attention to the particular word.

See how you reason, I used the capital S for the spirit of Adam too, why don't you worship him too.

It (music) is the Quran of shaitan and the thick hijab (that screen people) from arRahman.
Ibn Qoyyim in ighaathatul lahfaan

Therefore the true believer should music of all kinds, including those that are referred to as 'Islamic music.

BaarakaLLaahu feekum

sex with war captives is very different from sex with prostitutes, servants or rape.

In the case of war captives it is a punishment for them. The commander has a right to distribute them, ransom them or setting them free.

The male captives can also be ransomed or distributed depending on the discretion of the commander and in case of treason they may be killed.

The Syrians are not war captives and even Islam wouldn't have taken such displaced people as slaves rather they would be given accommodation.

This is not peculiar to Islam alone rather it is the path of the Prophets before us as been proven before by many verses from your distorted book.

Even Hajar was Abraham's slave and she bore a blessed son for him. So if you wish contradict the path of the righteous predecessors -like you always do -because of some pagan atheist western methodology.

This humiliation is a reward for their crime against the divine monotheistic creed in this world, and a more severe punishment awaits them in the hereafter!

So, repent from worshipping other than the God of Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus the Lord of the world who Muhammad alyhissolaat wassalaam also worshipped. Do not associate partners with Him lest you spend your eternity in hell.

Aameen wa iyyaak

ArcBoB:
Alhamdulillah, Ana talibu salafiyyah...Jazakhumu lah khair op. May Allah make us steadfast on the deen. Ameen

Aameen wa iyyaak

okay.

BismiLLaah

Firstly, may Allah reward OP with good in this world and the hereafter for the benefits.

Secondly, the prohibition of anal sex and intercourse during menstruation are clear cut in the Sharia.

Thirdly, the matter of excessive intercourse needs evidence. Our spouses are "tilts for us so approach your tilts as you wish" as Allah explained in baqarah. The scholars say that the verse is general and means you can enjoy your spouse in any way and manner, therefore anyone who wishes to restrict this general permission should provide evidence for his restriction. And that is what the OP has done regarding the menstrual and anal intercourse. May Allah reward her with good.

Fourthly : the scholars are divided in the matter of MouthAction into two groups : the first say its a detested act while the second say its an outrightly permitted act.

I will mention the argument of the two schools of taught and each person should weigh the evidences and probably carry out more research on the matter before choosing one. it should not be based on desires.

The group which say its impermissible mention the following argument

1) It is known among animals and anyone who ponders on Islamic ruling will see the prohibition of imitating animals.

2) it was created and popular among the disbelievers and we have been prohibited from imitating them.

3) it involves exposing oneself to filthy materials such as semen,pre semen, urine, vaginal fluids etc
note; semen is not a najis (impurity) in the Sharia rather it is just a filth. The difference is that najis on your body invalidates your Solah e. g urine, pre semen, feaces but filth does not except that normal human inclination tends away from it eg saliva, semen mucus so your Solah is valid even if you have mucus on your body.

4) It was not known among the salaf

5) it involves dishonouring the face which is the most important part of the body. we use it for sujud especially the mouth for dhikr and Quran etc

The other scholars have given the following responses;

1) Intercourse is also known with animals, and it is not detested so why should this be also detested especially when Allah has given a general permission, restrictions should be with explicit texts.

2) The issue of intercourse is basically a mundane act, such as building houses or riding cars. Has anyone ever prohibited a particular architecture or car design because it is from the disbelievers?! So also this matter.

3) Kissing your wife's mouth even the deep kiss is permissible with evidence. And we all know that saliva is filth, so if kiss is permissible why should MouthAction not be. As for the vaginal fluids then they are pure though may be regarded as filth, so it takes the same rule as saliva.
As for pre semen, Then if it is not swallowed then it's fine. And this is the same for male and female.

4) The matter is not an act of worship basically, so why should it be restricted to the salaf. e.g using condoms is permissible but it wasn't known with the salaf. So it's only acts of worship that should not be established except by the way of the salaf.

5) All these are heresays and there is no straight evidence to prohibit it. The face is honoured, yes, but other parts too are used for sujood a
you don't say hand stimulation is Haram so why should this be?!

Personally, i see it as permissible but I have a personal lack of interest in it. But if a person does it I have no problem with it especially if the marriage is at stake because one of the spouses sees it as the 'perfect' intercourse because of his previous exposures before marriage.

However it must not involve swallowing of semen and should not be a substitute for the actual intercourse rather it should be to stimulate and serve as fore play.

Then no scholar of the past declared it as Haram, the most is that it is makrooh i.e you will be rewarded for leaving it for Allah's sake and will not be punished for doing it.

Haram means you will be punished for doing it and will be rewarded for leaving it for Allah's sake.

Allahumma solli alaa Muhammadin wa sallim.

Let us reason TOGETHER!

In six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested,
and was refreshed” (Exodus 31: 17)

Does God get tired? If God was to rest for a microseconds, what do you think
would happen to the universe?

And indeed We created the heavens and the earth and all between them in six
Days and nothing of fatigue touched Us (Quran 50:38).

Awake, why do you sleep, O Lord?” (Psalms 44:23)

do u really think the lord of the universe sleeps?

Neither slumber nor sleep overtakes Him(Allah)” (Quran 2:255)

And the Lord was sorry that he made man on the earth , and it grieved him to
his heart. [he said]: For I am sorry that I have made them.” (Genesis 6:6-7)

Was God ignorant of the future? Does God forgets?

My Lord Never Errs, Nor Forgets” (Quran 20:52)

“Let us make man in our own image” (Genesis 1:26)

Do you mean God resembled his creatures? His two eyes, nose, hands, abdomen
are exactly like that of his creatures? You mean he had private parts as well? And
what does He do with it?

There is nothing like unto Him(Allah), and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer.
(Qur'an42:11)

what is your comment on this oh followers of Christ? Do u say the Qur'an copied
the bible? How come the Qur'an didn't copy the errors too? Are you not surprised
and amazed by the eloquence and proficiency of the language of the book of Allah
and its sweetness, beauty and free flowing?

Oh followers of Christ, don't let the falsehood people spread about Islam
mislead u from accepting the truth, read and ponder over the statements of Allah,
because it is nothing but truth.

Do they not then ponder over the Quran carefully? Had it been from other than
Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions.(Qur'an 4:82)

Demmzy15:
Op your message is clear, what of people that term themselves "Salafi", does it make any sense? Are we not meant to call ourselves Muslims? Please don't get me wrong, I read books of scholars of salafiyyah like Ibn Taymiyyah(rah), AbdulQadir Gilani(rah), Imam Suyuti(rah), Ibn Jawzee(rah), Ibn Qayyim Al jawziyyah(rah), Muhammad Ibn Abdulwahab(rah), al Khateeb Al Baghdadi(rah), Al Fawzan(hf), Zaid Al Madakhali(hf), Rabee Al Madakhaki(hf), Saleh Suhaymin(hf), Imam Al Albani(rah), Imam bin Baz(rah), etc but is it a must you must term yourself "salafi"? I think Muslim is appropriate because this is what Allaah called us

Firstly; jazaakaLLaahu khayraa for your question and avarice for good.

Secondly, the different sects and divisions in Islam is known to all of us. However, the truth is one.
And the messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam said (....and my nation will divide into 73 sects all in hell except one. They said and who are the saved sect oh messenger. he alyhissolaat wassalaam said The one that is upon what me and my companions are upon).

All these sects also refer to themselves as Muslims therefore there is need to make distinction between the saved sect and the others.
This distinction is what led to names like ahlul Hadeeth, ahlu sunnah wal jamaa, in different eras over time depending on the deviations that showed up.

Example; ahlul Hadith was as a result of the deviation of sticking to scholarly opinions even when it was certain that it contradicted the Quran and sunnah. So the call then was for the people to return to the sunnah and not make scholarly opinions equal in rank to texts of Quran and sunnah. This does not mean that they told them to ignore the scholars but they told them to shun dogmatism.

The name ahlu sunnah was as a result of people sticking to other ways and believing that the sunnah of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam is not binding or important. Then the tide shifted to the revival of a lot of 'dead' sunnah like the cutting of trousers, leaving the beards, eating with the right, early marriage, home schooling etc. And even some sunnah which the people saw as trivial such as licking the hands and plate after meal, the various adhkar for several activities, the use of chewing stick, walking barefoot once in a while etc.

Then when the problem of creating parties like ansaru deen, nasfat, TMC, and MSSN became a party, tabligh etc such that people loved and hated for the sake of party. They would shun any text of the Quran or Sunnah if it contradicted their goals as a party. In fact they made their call to parties and not the pure Islam and every party became as Allah says in suratul muuminoon (( then they divided their affairs (religion) into pieces, each party happy with what it had)) i.e each party chose only a part of the shariah and neglected a large part and they were contented with the little part they held on to. This may look harmless but it is a great undoing for any person or group of people to intentionally and stubbornly ignore any part of the shariah or term it as unimportant.
If you ask all these parties, they will say they follow the Quran and sunnah. but why do we then have these differences? Each person has given the verses and hadiths the interpretation that is not correct because of ignorance or to support a deviation he has.

The only way to purify the religion from these misguidance is that we return to the sunnah and understanding of the salaf.

The kind of understanding that made Allah and His messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam pleased with them and made them rule the world.

All these and many more reasons are why there was a need to call to the return of the Muslims to the way of the salaf i.e pious predecessors and practice Islam according to how they practiced it.

So if I ask you now, what type of Islam do you practice? The only correct reply is that "I follow the Quran and sunnah according to the interpretation of the righteous predecessors i.e salaf".

Repeating this might be difficult so summarize it in a word, the only way is to say I'm salafy.

Many people find problem with this term (i.e affiliating oneself to the salaf) but paradoxically they don't find problem at all in affiliating oneself to individuals such as saying I'm malikiyyah or Hanbaliyyah etc And even many more affiliate themselves to parties and groups which have no basis in the Quran and sunnah.

Then Salafiyyah is not a group rather it is a call and major indicator of this is that there is no Supreme authority in it except the Quran and sunnah according to the interpretation of the righteous predecessors i.e the companions and those who follow them.

WHY SALAFIYYAH?

By Shaykh Umar Paiko Hafizahulahu from Niger State to the Annur Magazine of OAU Ile-Ife....

It is commonplace to hear Muslims worry over the salafiyyah concept. Is it another sect initiated via iblees's evil whisperings? Why is there a need for the salafiyyah movement/sect, if it is one, despite the existence of sunni movements like Ansaarul Islaam, Jamaa'atu Izaalatil Bid ah Wa Iqaamatis Sunnah et al.?

These are questions asked mostly by sunni activists particularly. Liberal Muslims-zanaadiqah (orientalists) and the Muslim mob simply brand the salafi an extremist, which, to them, results in or is synonymous with, terrorism!

The latter is the most ridiculous, misinformed/mischievous opinion I ever heard of salafiyyah.
To clarify the issues raised above, we need to examine the term SALAFIYYAH.

The term SALAFIYYAH is derived from the noun SALAF which doubles as a verb in past tense, which means "Ancestor(s), Forefather(s), forebear(s), grandfather(s), primogenitor(s), progenitor(s), ascendant(s), predecessor, precursor." Our Salaf are those through whom Islaam was passed to us-first being the sahaabah, concerning whom Allaah says:

"Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah, and those with him are severe on kuffaar, merciful between themselves. You see them bowed,prostrate, seeking bounties from their Lord and His pleasure..."

These should remain the reference point of any Muslim who didn't see the Prophet. Allaah says: "Was man yushaaqqiqir Rasoola min ba'di maa tabayyana lahul hudaa was yattabi' ghaira sabeelil Mu'mineen, nuwallihee maa tawallaa was nuswlihee jahannam was saa-at maseeraa"

From the verse above, it becomes clear that the path of the earliest Muslims-the sahaabah, our first generation salaf-is in conformity with the Prophet's path, disparity with whom leads one astray!
Salafiyyah reminds all sunni groups and organizations of Islaam's true source spring, in order to address the drift from the sunnah, occasioned by overzealousness or laxity on the part of some of their du'aat (callers). The Jamaa'atu Ahlis Sunnah Lid Da'wati Wall Jihaad claims to belong to the sunnah fold but fail to draw inspiration from our pious predecessors, chiefly the sahaabah, who existed under deviant, even oppressive leaders who contravened the sharee'ah on many instances but (the salaf) remained consistent in their allegiance though constantly but appropriately admonishing them when they erred.

Salafiyyah isn't a sect. It is a call. It isn't a mob action. It is a reawakening, not a misguided revolt. Salafiyyah cleanses the rust and disinfects the rot in the fabric of the bodies calling to sunnah. Salafiyyah is a compass. Salafiyyah is Islaam revisited!
Islaam is today plagued by inauthentic ahaadeeth, wicked fabrications against Rasool, alaihiSSALAAM, misrepresentations due to ignorance of text, leading to misfired repugnance from non Muslims, and innovations resulting from all of the above. A return to the Qur'aan and authentic sunnah is pertinent, especially with the understanding and their application by the salaf.

The understanding of the salaf is an interpretation of any sahaabee, taabi'ee, taabi'oot taabi'een or atbaa' of the Qur'aan and/or sunnah which isn't contradicted by the basic Islamic principles, or the consensus reached by a past generation of Muslim scholars on the guided path.
It is mischievous, for instance, for anyone to infer that individuals can declare others polytheists or apostate on the simple ground that AbduLLAAHI Bn Zubair purportedly declared Hajjaaj Bn Yoosuf apostate. We have to sum up the submissions of the other sahaabah to ascertain the pristine Islamic teaching on the subject.
There are four generations that constitute the creme de LA creme of our salaf : the companions, the generation after them, the one after and the fourth. The narration/reportage of hadeeth per transmission stops in those generations. Any generation after these will only record, assimilate and pass on what was reported by them. Whatever they agreed upon is LAW!

Our generation suffers a dearth of morality and depth of knowledge. Rasool, alaihiSSALAAM says: Verily Allaah does not seize knowledge (of the deen) by erasing it from memories of its bearers, He rather seizes it by taking the lives of the scholars, until He leaves no scholar alive, (ignorant) people will hold ignorant leaders as their scholars. They shall be asked and they shall respond ignorantly, stray and lead (their followers) astray"

It is very clear that since the demise of Abubakr, 'Umar, 'Uthmaan and 'Aliy, radiyAllaahu 'anhum, the ummah hasn't replaced them. This trend has continued in this retrogressive manner till this day. It is crystal clear that the hadeeth above applies more to this generation than to any before ours. It is therefore misleading to assume that the view of the majority is necessarily right.

Salafiyyah attaches importance only to that which conforms with the methodology of the salaf , not the majority in deviant generations.
Sects like ISIS, JASLDWJ (boko haram ), ASHSHABAAB and their likes which seek a return to sharee'ah without recourse to the light shone by our salaf who found themselves in similar situations are bedeviled by contradictions entrenched by their quackery. These aren't salafees!

begging the question!!!

Christians and their double standards!!!

When talking about the west, they divided religion from the people and claimed that they didn't do it in the name of religion. But when it came to discussing islam and Arabs they turned the table!!!

Islam had brought civilization to Africa centuries before the westerners except that the westerners were bloody noise makers and tyrants who were greedy.

I wouldn't expect anything less from a person who claims that being poor is synonymous to being ungodly!

The westerners came as missionaries, to preach religion and they used the opportunity to overtake our lives. The misery Nigeria is facing today is a direct or indirect result of their evils.

So please stop the double standards and quit talking with little or no sense at all.

Someone once mentioned that in the Islam section, hardly does anyone talk about christians and their religion but the Christians can't submit five topics without a word against Islam.

I pondered on this observation for a while then it occurred to me that the reason for that is that:

Islam is a religion filled with different guidance regarding many matters rather all matters of our life therefore it's adherents would be too busy learning such matters to have time to insult others except when necessary then they clarify in the best of manners as we have all witnessed on nairaland.

On the other hand, the Christians don't have guidance on matters of their worship not to mention that of their day-to-day life.

These matters include the conditions of Islam and the nullifiers of Islam, the names and attributes of Allah, the seerah of the Messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam, the sciences and understanding of hadith.

In normal life, matters of government, etiquette of marriage, eating, toilet, wearing clothes, intercourse, sleeping etc

So tell me how do you compare a jobless person to someone who has alot to learn and apply.

I know some might say, no the holy spirit teaches us so no need to spend time learning.
I say : If they were all from the same true source then we wouldn't find therein the differences that characterize today's christians.

ruffyola:
Jesus saying peace be upon me the day I was born , the day I shall die and the day I'll be resurrected, does not mean that he died and rise cos Yahya(john the Baptist) said same and nobody ever said he died and rise.
And mind u Islam never agreed that Jesus was even crucified let alone being dead or even rising.

Exactly. The word tawaffa in Arabic means to take a person's soul.

However, in the context of the Quran, it can also mean to 'cause to sleep'. like Allah described in Surah Zumar that "Allah 'ya-tawaffa' the souls at the time of their death and the one that does die during its sleep"
So He uses the same tawaffa for both the dead and sleeping.

And Allah expressly states in another part of the Quran that "and they didn't kill him nor did they crucify him rather it was mad ambiguous to them... " and that's why till today the Christians are in confusion and uncertainty regarding their religion.

even lies are too apparent for Chris loyalists to believe. AlhamduliLlah for the mercy of Islam.

now I know why Christians will do anything for money, and the only righteous Christian is the wealthy Christian.

Now I know why owning a private jet is a sign of prophethood in Christianity even if those jets are used for smuggling ammunition.

Now I know why church services are the same monotonous dose of placebo giving people 'reasons' why they are poor.

Now, I have stopped wondering. thanks alot OP for shedding some light on the reason why Christian societies -both in Nigeria and outside- are the most aggressive in their search for wealth.

However, tell me, was Jesus himself a wealthy man? how many men of God did the Bible -as distorted as it is - describe as wealthy such that they were known for their wealth?

Toks2008:
Many people all around the world are asking this question."why was Jesus crucified"? Was it really necessary? why did GOD have to go through this means to save the world when he has the power to just do it? In-fact is there any sense in Jesus been crucified?

The truth be told,i have pondered over this a trillion times and the more i think about the more confused i get but nevertheless i had taught about it deeply and arrived at this conclusion.

Every system has a rule and a laid down module and no matter how i want to see it,it is imperative to understand that Jehovah the creator of mankind chose to do things in his own way and maybe when i see him someday,i will ask why there must be shedding of blood before sins can be forgiven by him.

Thus, through the blood of animal sacrifice a man was made pure before God and reconciled to him. Says Moses in Leviticus: "For the life of the creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is blood that makes atonement for one’s life" (Leviticus 17:11).

Even the Quran agrees that even though blood of the animal sacrifice do not "reach God," (Al-Hajj Verse No:37) and also in Islam a sacrifice can expiate a pilgrim’s sin (Sura 5:95).

So Apparently Christ’s sacrifice on the cross means that animals do not have to be slaughtered for expiation. Christ’s own final and once-and-for-all sacrifice expiates for all sins—even the smallest or the largest. The ritual does not need to be repeated literally and endlessly by means of animals. Christ’s sacrifice "reaches" God.

In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness. (Hebrews 9:22).

GOD also made us understand that in the past,blood of animals were shed to atone for sins but this was getting so boring so he decided to make a sacrifice for the sins of the world once and for all but it was impossible to use the blood of animals so he had to send Jesus as "a human lamb" because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins of the whole world.(Hebrews 10:4)

This was why when Christ came into the world, he said: "Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but a body you prepared for me for you were not pleased with burnt offerings or other offerings for sin so Here I am--it is written about me in the scroll--I have come to do your will, O God.'"(Hebrews 10:5-

So he was sacrificed as a human lamb on a wooden cross just like a lamb is sacrificed on a wooden platform and his blood spilled to cleanse the world of sins once and for all thereby abolishing all the yearly animal sacrifices done in the past for the remission of sins.Hallelujah

No matter how film makers try to reflect the sufferings christ went through, they are not able to truly show the pains Jesus had to go through to save you and i from sins.His skin was ripped apart and one eye blinded by whip of thorns and shattered glass.Crown of thorns forced down his skull. Brutally crucified naked and formless on the cross. All these Christ endured to save you and i from sin and death.

Whether you are a Muslim,Atheist,unbeliever in any form, all GOD require of you is to believe that Jesus was slain to save you and accept him as your lord and savior.Simple and straight forward and i believe that when we get to paradise,we just might ask GOD why there must be a blood shed before sins can be forgiven but for now his name remains "THE UNQUESTIONABLE GOD"

As far as Islam is concerned, the condition for forgiveness of sins is your repentance. As for the slaughtering of animals then it's just one of many acts of worship that we do.

And it's not even a condition for salvation in Islam! and that's why anyone who doesn't have the means to purchase a ram is exempted just like someone who has no money for hajj.

I don't know how you people even reason sef, and that's if you ever do.

Mumu, many other criminals - before and after - that slowpoke -not christ- that have been crucified on the cross and subjected to equal and even greater torments. Because they didn't have noise makers like paul the criminal!!!

ZKOSOSO:
Islam has nothing to do with YAHWEH


It has nothing to do with JESUS CHRIST

It has nothing to do with Righteousness!

It just a collective bondage to reject Christ as saviour of mankind!

Does the Christian Christ have any teachings ?!

Last time I checked, the cross, Christmas and even the bible etc were never preached by Jesus. They were all innovated by that criminal paul.

OAU muslim students invite fellow Christian students for discussion at Islamic Awareness Program IAP.



Topic: Jesus, our point of convergence and divergence.

Lecturer: Ustadh Abu Rayyan AbdulHameed Uthman

Venue : Awolowo Hall Cafe.
Date: 21st February 2016
Time : 8 : 30pm.

This is a religious discussion, not an argument.

Muhyideen is also the nickname given to Imam Zakariyyah an-Nawaawiyy the compiler of those forty two narrations.

Though the imam detested the name because it connoted a lot of praise which he felt he didn't deserve.

Muhyi means the one that gives lives to something. Deen means Religion but in this case it is definite i.e the religion which will refer to no other religion but Islam.

abram10:
true but people use grace to practise sin. We thank God for what Christ did on the cross.

You mean the way he - desperately but futilely - cried for help?!
Man, those thugs dealt with your God big time. He got the thrashing of his life.

I had be a pathetic loser if I worshipped such a loser.

Krystalzkris:
the word of the lord,praise be to god....




Y'all christians need help... Am sure u should also try to obey the part that says you should stone all ladies who are not virgins..

Maybe 90percent of choir girls will be stoned.

Krystalzkris:
the word of the lord,praise be to god....




Y'all christians need help... Am sure u should also try to obey the part that says you should stone all ladies who are not virgins..

Maybe 90percent of choir girls will be stoned.