₦airaland Forum

harlos: so till when should i be expecting what i've missed?

when you help her renew her data bundle

toshmann: Abi o, it's been heated argument and vituperation for pages on end

*pretending to know what the vitu-something word is*
as in eh,.. Too lazy to even read through all previous pages to be in sync with the argument.

[quote author=I.Joan]For real? ? ? ?

So, anyone who is not a feminist is a misogynist? ? ?
You seem lonely... Get a dog![/quote]lmao!

So good to find something funny here

toshmann: I take credit for reviving the thread. But some other peeps here jointly will take credit for making the thread a trending one

99cent: it's a carry over discussion from another thread. trust me
and i'm glad for that because that topic was getting very disgusting. at least here we have Chimamanda as an authority figure to back the feminist cause and her name is on the topic title rather than that other silly thread.

ItsModella stroll enter villa and her (thread) market start to boom... Hmmm...

caribchic: Tis is only 6 pm in mine, so evening is about right..good evening to you too

thanks ma'am

Truckpusher: Oahray,...are you also peeping?

uhmmm... I was looking for something. Then I realised I didn't leave it here.

Good evening/whatever-period-it-is-in-your-zone all

k2039: I do understand your point, if we start this debate we will just toss to and fro without reaching a conclusion. Putting your complete trust on human is setting yourself up for failure from the start, there should be provision for errors (though some errors are disastrous and not forgivable) so that when this errors do happen one won't be completely hurt in the end.

Even in marriages, 100% peak if achievable will be towards the couples old age, then the trust would have been earned after series of life experience.

You don't have to necessarily agree with me, but the best you can do is trust yourself because you are responsible for yourself alone. Everyone has both potential to behave like a swine or saint within himself; though which one is actualized depends on decisions not necessarily conditions and people change with time. A saint today could be a slut tomorrow and that is not in your jurisdiction to determine for that person.

Every relationship should be built on trust, but complete trust is simply setting one for failure because humans will always remain humans.

Now Killz will quote me. I'm out of here.

*quoting you before he does*

The op never asked HOW MUCH you trust, but IF you CAN trust. Saying no is like saying you have 0% trust in your friend to respect you and your boundaries and 0% in your partner to be faithful to you.

It's something like this... If she tells you your best friend gave her a lift, you suspect he used her thigh as his arm rest. If she ever asks about him no matter how casually, you assume they are having an affair behind your back.

That is no relationship. It's a waste of time and energy.

sexkillz: [color=#000030]Its sad. [/color]

Who liked this post? Ogugua?

Ok, why is this thread trending after such a long time?

sexkillz: [color=#000030]You people are too emotional. [/color]

difference between humans and robots

Lol... Op, I find your post very educative.

Ok I lied. Truth is... I couldn't even finish it

Hope you understand why I had to lie? Your post says I have to tell six times more lies than you have today. That's no mean feat, considering the fact that you can give the devil a run for his money in a lying contest.

If you don't trust someone, you have no business being his/her best friend or partner.

Funny how people think it is not possible. Maybe it's the kinda cheat/fight breakups they are used to. Or maybe it's just my understanding of "hurt" and the op's question.

So He Opens Complicated Knots?

TUBER

Yes there is (infact, 'are'). Don't mind the poster above me.
It depends on the two of them and the circumstances though.

Gotta Run, A Car Exploded.

XYLEM

Which kind fake answers be all these?

^^ Esther 8:9