₦airaland Forum

shadelek:
In one of your dreams

fear let you quote me before dem manage score?

Chicharito... Man Utd product

Atletico abeg beat these people with 10 men. You can do it

Damn!

R. Madrid dey hungry, but anything wey make atletico first score sha... Game over.

I predict a draw, not a goaless one. Maybe 1-1. Guess who goes through

What if the phone has been kidnapped and switched off?

Why does your post sound like it's justifying rape? No one is MADE to rape (it's a willing decision), and konji isn't uncontrollable.

Please let's try to reduce the number of silly threads this section produces everyday

Of course display pics matter. They help shape whatever impression I already have of a person. But they wouldn't make me relate with you any more or less than I already do.

Minemrys:
that doesn't stop the fact that the BvS teaser is far better the one staged by age of ultron. True or false?

you'd judge between two movies with just their trailers? Smh. Well, I wont, even if I've seen both teasers.

When I watch both movies, I can choose which is the better movie. I am not a fanboy of either comic universe, and I don't fall for trailer-inspired hype anymore.

Hmmm...

Dygeasy:
We are at the drawing board trying to work out some things. We will come reloaded in due time.

alright, no p

Dygeasy, what has happened to the Miss NL contest?

sage1000:
Just going to leave this here. It was very funny
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR5HuQK5fYY

Can't both sides of the arguments just agree the movies both companies make appeal differently to others. They both have their great movies (Dark Knight, Avengers and Winter Soldier) and their terrible movies (Green Lantern, Dark World and Iron Man 2). They are using different techniques to create good movies for us to watch, if their movie styles where the same it would be worse and the competition between them means they both have to be on top of their games so that means more great superhero movies for us in future. The DC and Marvel arguments just get in the way of enjoying some perfectly good movies either way.

bros you wise jor. The DC vs Marvel argument is lame. I'd enjoy interesting movies, regardless of who makes them.

If you are talking based on the child's need, and not just wants coupled with the parent's indulgence, then it's the female child, obviously.

However, gender isn't the biggest of determining factors. Children with special needs would always require more resources, regardless of gender. A parent with a favourite child is likely to spend more on that one, even if he/she doesn't really need it.

Your talk about supporting male children past the mid twenties, doesn't hold water. Many guys are already hustling for themselves way before then. Many girls stay with their parents till marriage, but guys would likely move out to seek greener pastures.

fhunn:
see, when sin came into the world, death also came and it affected every living being/thing, you can't just tell me, death came and started picking on only humans?

And again not all animals were meant to die because not all were meant for food, not all were edible.

ok, if animals started dying because man sinned, why is it that Jesus died for humans only? Animals cannot exercise faith in Jesus, can they? So no hope.

If you insist that is so, then you are still agreeing that God's love for man is on the basis of being created in God's image. That stance, though, would mean animals are dying cos of a man's sin but can't be saved because of a man's sacrifice. Sounds pretty unfair.

However if you agree that human sin had nothing to do with animal death, then you are agreeing that man is special anyway, since only his death is given a remedy. Animals dying isn't a big deal.

Either way, God treats man as special because he loves man in special way. Were such love unconditional, he'd love the animals that way too. You haven't disproved this.

When I say animal death, I'm talking about natural death. Before they started being used as food.

standd:
Who is the pilot?

airborne, flying, pilot

Liked. You look older in your pic on the page sha.

See this girl even join sef. People no get conscience.
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=468320100008939&id=191623247678627&set=a.468296593344623.1073741836.191623247678627&refid=13

Hmmm... Thought provoking. He's right about the part where people are more critical of fellow blacks. I think it's a mentality most Africans are raised with.

However, I didn't miss the fact that the two incidents happens two years apart. Anything could have happened in two years. A homophobe could become a lil bit more tolerant in two years.

standd:
Lol e-monk kooo
Don't worry jor, I can't even offer anything again. Someone caught me red-handed

hehehe... The pilot? e-boo?

*modified*
My 10,000th post

fhunn:
firstly, will you agree to the fact that if adam and eve did not sin there won't be untimely death and natural disasters?

well, there was a tree of life, from which they (Adam and Eve) weren't prohibited. They might have eventually eaten from it and lived on, had they not sinned. As for natural disasters, we can only speculate.

What is clear, however, is that man's disobedience didn't cause the death of animals. They were evidently meant to die from the start. They weren't created in God's image, and as such, weren't as special.

standd:
This reality just ripped a large part of my butt off.
Oahray , I don't like this your thread at all. Hian!!! My first love, loved me unconditionally

**
Your siggy tickles my fancy Are you e-married? I want to apply to be your

awww... You flatter me. Looks like I'm the only one without pleasant memories of a 'first love' though. I might have to look for a way to disqualify her and rewrite my own history... As soon as I'm sure what a first love really is.

Is e-singleness one of your conditions for the _____ () you are offering? I em... *sweating* I'm an e-monk.

charlsecy:
@OP,
How about these?

Marrying a person with a life-threatening disease such as AIDS, marrying a woman without womb, marrying a penniless fellow without much hope for the future?

Are these conditional?

examine the fact that the person is chosen out of the billions of other men or women alive, and you'd find your answer. Something must have brought them together to that point where other healthier or richer persons couldn't reach.

Saying it is conditional is not the same as saying it selfish. I think people confuse both concepts alot.

fhunn:
See like you said God gave man dominion over everything but they lost it when they sinned which granted satan access into this world of ours and with him came all sorts of negativities even death and thats why animals die without human involvement.

And you cannot expect God to leave the people who built the ark to die, do you? Infact the vips on the ark should be the humans that built it na! Then He'll divide the remainig space to whatever He wants to save, abi?

You said God made animals for food to humans, so if you say God loves humans, He will also have to care for the animals since they are one of the necessary sources for food.

no human sin has no link with animal death. If man sinned, he was the one to die. The bible made that clear.

I'm not saying God doesn't love animals. He just loves humans way more. It is not without reason.

Dannidom:
Op I have a question for u. Answer it then we talk about unconditional love

Do you love yourself conditionally?

of course. The condition being that I'm me. That's the only condition most people need. The condition had already been met before consciousness as an infant. Some others need more than that, so they slash their wrists and inflict pain on themselves (you can research this).

Now if it were possible to have a clone of myself, identical and all, and he tried to kill me, I'd still do anything to protect myself, even if it means hurting him, and even if he is biologically the same as me. Survival instinct

So what were you saying about unconditional love?

fhunn:
i won't say God's love is conditional, just because He sent His Son to die for humans doesn't mean He loves animals less.
The reason Jesus died for humans alone is simply because we are the ones who sinned not animals or even the serpent that tempted Eve. You can't tell me Jesus will come and die for animals that didn't commit any sin.
It was we, humans He clearly commanded not to eat the fruit not animals, irrespective of how you are tempted.
So, God's love is unconditional

humans alone are specifically given dominion over the earth by God.

Animals didn't need to commit any sin before they started dying. They have no remedy for their death either.

The actions of humans made God flood the whole earth once, killing animals too. Only humans were given unlimited slots in the ark, all they had to do was just believe Noah, and walk in before it became too late. A third elephant wouldn't have been allowed into the ark even to save its life.

God gave permission for animals to be killed for food, but not humans.

Let me stop there. Remind me how God doesn't love man more than animals.

firestar:
"Give me, your unconditional love...
...the kind of love I deserve,
The kind I want to return. "

Oahray. Does that ring a bell?

Now, which article inspired this flash of brilliance from, eh?

You know Donna?

Ha! You no be small pikin o. Good evening ma

shachris03:
there is no full or empty love. love is love. just like death is death.

hmmm... no levels? Someday, you'd realize that love isn't black and white, that it blossoms and fades.

How can you even argue about love when you don't know something that basic? I really am done here mehn.

shachris03:
of course love is preset. you either love or you don't.

lol. Read what you are answering again. Love either FULLY exists or doesn't exist at all? Either you love someone completely or do not love at all? You'd understand better someday.

I'm still laughing at the unconditional biscuit analogy. Thanks for making my evening, bro. See ya

shachris03:
true, our choice will be based on conditions, i never denied that. but the quality of the love we are going to give is what is in contention and not the choices.

think of it this way. let's take love like biscuits you go to buy in the marked. we have normal biscuits, conditional biscuits, unconditional biscuits.

Now me going to the market to buy biscuits, i would choose the type of biscuits i would love to eat based on my intention and test. No matter my reason for choosing unconditional biscuits, it doesn't mean that without me choosing, the biscuit doesn't exist originally in it's perfect condition. My choice doesn't affect the nature of the biscuits, but my choice determines the type of biscuits i get.

unconditional love does not need reasons to exist.

lmao! What an analogy

I also used to think that love was something preset, something that either exists fully or doesn't exist at all... Black or else white. But that was several years ago.

If you think your illustration makes any sense, so be it. We can agree to disagree. Let the readers judge. It was nice discussing with you.