So if that place has been ShopRite premises or Mega chicken, you go start packing, towing, clamping or impounding all vehicles you met there??
Would same have been done if that place is a bank??
The painful part is that an idiot thought it wise to release this kind of thrash as statement

Make Dem go back to their work before they were appointed as aides. I'm so sure they stayed because they were getting something else aside salary, if not, no one stays on a job for 15months without pay.

Zxcvbnmghtr:


Osimhen's conversation rate is higher than Yekini's which makes the probability of him breaking Yekini's goal record.

I get you. Thanks

Nonsense, so PDP can also come out to say this thrash..
So they don't know that a header or footer note can be created on a scanned document?
That header note is obviously created after the document has been printed, which is after the scanning, as the font is different, the alignment on some of the pages is not the same with the body, if you have any issues with it, let your counsel write officially to the registry.
Attached is a copy I downloaded and insert a note at the top right

Zxcvbnmghtr:


Osimhen's average with 20 goals in 26 matches is already more than Yekini's. Hopefully he will surpass.

The op ain't talking about average or conversion rate, but the total goals scored.
If you play 5matches, scored 15 goals, the player that played 15matches but scored 16goals will receive the highest scorer award irrespective of the conversion rate.

Revolution2022:
Have previous election that were monitored by party agents prevent rigging 99%?APC and it supporters are against transmission of election results because it prevent rigging.The political party and it supporters are the only group that are against electronic transmission of results in realtime.

Not interested in your argument for or against whatever your choice candidate is, I'm just correcting the agents not moving notion.

Revolution2022:
Party agents will not make an election credible.After party agents have sign the results they will leave.Inec officials in connivance with APC will move the voting materials to a secret place and thumbprint votes for your useless Tinubu that forfeited drug money to US government.
But if results is transmitted immediately nobody can alter it.Not even MC oluomo and his thugs who destroyed polling units where Tinubu and sanwo olu lost.

This assertion is false. Party Agents are not only meant for PU, but for all activities from movement of the sensitive materials to the final declaration.
The agents and security on duty at a polling unit move with the Polling Officers to the next phase, then the agent appointed for that phase takes charge.
Agents from all PU move to ward level, the one for ward level take over from them, then ward level agents moves to lga, the lga level agent takes charge, it continues till it gets to the final stage

tinsel:

Is he even allowed to tender new evidence at the Supreme Court ?

Just an academic exercise, it has no effect on the occupant of the office.
Lawyers are too corrupt, honestly, this is a dead case, and I'm sure the counsels know but they won't tell their clients the truth

The pdp is right on this, I was even wondering how he submitted a resumption letter when he is not in office.
Btw, his own case better pass the Abuja and Lagos politicians, some go come back like dat and fly to Abuja or Lagos with different people flying in to pay homage.

yinkus6750:
Accidents keep occuring there all the time.
Yet , FRSC, Police, TRACE and the government can't seem it fit on how to sanitize the mad activities going on at the toll gate.
So unfortunate that the citizens life doesn't matter.
May the souls of the departed RIP.

The event happened at 5am, the alleged cause was over speeding, what do you expect the agencies or govt to do?
The U-turn there has been removed, a slope from 3 axis met there, any sane driver should reduce his speed on a slope as you don't know what you might meet at the end of it

elonize:
d app large die o.dat edge browser

Yea, almost all Microsoft apps are large but me dey comfortable with it

Whitecoal711:
Haa why not protest, preferable,after all,it is in the constitution,and from it ,you can get riot
You can get riot from protest,but can't get protest from riot

We can get War from Riot

Na waooo, nothing politicians no fit do. This one dey accuse deputy gov of stealing his watch, he see the gov outside where e no get power, e no fit challenge am, na for here e wan com challenge am.
To iya nla ba gbe ni san le, kekere a si mu gun (if big battle brings one down, small small ones go dey merry on top the person)

Op, install Microsoft launcher and Edge browser.
The launcher will help you determine what is on your home screen. Go to your app settings, uninstall all apps not installed by you and not part of Google services, the ones you can't uninstall, force stop then disable them.
On your edge browser, go to settings and turn on ad blocker, you won't hear any noise again.
I can feel your pain, I've always been a Sam or Nok fan, work gave me a Tecno phone, na only God helped me not to hit it on the wall due to ads.

DMerciful:
Election Petition is different from normal court cases. Lets not give excuses for these structures of criminality.

Did you not watch the judgement where the judges said they'd get it the next day?

I didn't, but someone already referred me to it.
I think he got caught in rave of the moment and gave such unrealistic promise (considering we still run an analog abi na semi digital system), the same Judge that gave that promise might not be on seat at 8am on Thursday due to the work load prior day.
I'm not laying claim to whatever the situation might have been, but getting that report in 24hrs in the Nigerian system is not realistic, even if it's fast track. Do an analysis of the process and you will know that such report won't be ready under that time frame, you will only raise your hope unnecessarily to think you will have it within that time

DMerciful:
So if you have 14 days to file and you're given after 5days. Does that not reduce it to 9days? Does that leave enough time to study it and do all the necessary things before filing appeal?

Remember how they knocked of many evidence because it wasn't filed within 21days but we were here when INEC refused to release the materials.

This is like putting someone in the boxing ring and tying both hands

Point of filing is not when you drop all evidence to back your case, point of filing is when you make intention of an intervention of the court known.
The court will give you a timeline to drop all evidence, respondents will answer, when you will appear to speak, blah blah blah.
Eg, you breach a contract btw yourself and mine, I have 5days to file for a breach, it doesn't mean I will be presenting or you will be defending the case in 5days as the person to hear us might not even be available within that 5days, but I must show intent, so it won't be an after thought.
Law is not that difficult, dey only use some terms to make it so for us

So the grains can't be removed from the bag
I've seen lots of items given by NGO with the word NOT FOR SALE boldly printed on it, why can't same be done for this?

DMerciful:
Why can't they duplicate the one they read and certify it?

No, it won't include some stuffs.
Things like the justice remarks will be present, counsels presence, also note that each justice will have his own judgement, but the judgement copy will be a compendium. It's more like having a report of everything that happened in court for that day.

Omowale2023:

It's obvious you didn't follow the proceedings. The judges said on latest Thursday that dey will get the judgement.
Go and watch the proceedings

I didn't watch upto that point. Didn't watch for the stretch, watching intermittently.

seborrhic:
The story is as confusing as it's comical and can only happen in Nigeria,amongst a few other orderless countries:a state goverment suspended the Rector of a Polytechnic fully owned by that same state government and appointed a new rector.
Then,the suspended rector whose salary is paid by the state goverment,office run by the government and who sat in the office at the behest of the state goverment,resumes office while the new rector was already running the institution.
What does the state government do?Close that the school.Not because of a riot,not because of an endemic health crisis in the School,not because of cultists running amok,but because of one man!!
Unless I am reading a different story,this is too comical to digest.

I'm on my way to send the VC of Osun State University out of office so I can take charge. Expect the closure of the school soon.
This Adeleke no dey try at al, close sch because a staff under suspension refused to stay under suspension?
Maybe e get something wey we no know

Majesty7:


Honestly, it's so worrisome. You wonder if they were newly exposed to the internet. Honestly, I don't understand these children

Seriously worrisome

danijesus:
oga the judge promised that the copy would be available by Thursday,so why the delay?

Which of the Judges? I never heard that. Kindly avail the details of the judge.
The ruling was more than a full working day reading, I'm sure it's going to be upto 100pages or more, do you think the civil servants will work overtime as the judges did that day?
Except they open on weekends, the document might not be ready till Monday. All the judges on seat will go through it before it's release to anyone.
The clearical staff will do the typing on Thursday, give it to the judges to go through it, let's assumed it's returned to the clearical staff same Thursday (probably afternoon or evening), necessary corrections are made on Friday morning till around noon, before it's release to anyone. That's if the staff treat it as urgent ooo.
So how do you think the document will be ready on Thursday?

Una don start again, a judge will use one of this lawyers as scapegoat someday, Dem go com dey beg, temper justice with mercy.
It's just little more than 24hrs after the judgement, everyone knows you don't get a copy of judgement immediately after ruling, it takes few days (probably 2 to 5days due to the nature of the subject).
The ruling ended late hour of Wednesday, you wan pick up the copy on Thursday morning
All Judges reaction will be stated, they will have to go through it after its preparation to be sure that it's their words that is on paper, or you think it's the judge that types the doc

sslcrypt:
This is a half baked story. DSS operatives won't shot neither kill unarmed civilian. We need real account of this issue not the market talk.

Dis one don travel go Yankee since the days of yaradua, e no sabi wetin dey sup for naija again

DMerciful:
DSS has been reduced to the Nigerian police by Bubu and Tinubu.

You hardly hear of DSS during the days of Obj to GEJ administrations

This is false, only obj and yaradua DSS was silent, from gej till date, DSS has always been acting as OAP.
Maybe you have forgotten Marylyn Ogar, the famous spokesperson that claimed DSS arrested an adult for walking in the night because dey no want make him injure himself as they don't know his family.

Shattuck:
I think my analogy still represents the true events, as per your analogy if I refuse to bring my witness provided I have other legal evidence that justifies my claim I don't see any problem with that, as regards why lp didn't provide agents at the tribunal remember LP was challenging the results for the entire state, when each state has over a thousand polling unit, wouldn't it have been too cumbersome if LP had brought thousands of polling unit agent into the court room? Would the tribunal have given each polling unit agent time to present their case? Remember that during the trial a time slot was allocated to each party, now if they where to plead their case polling unit by unit, you know they would run out of time and they also have other cases too like the certificate issues, double nomination to prove.

That's where they got it wrong, the tribunal is only meant for voting issues, every other issues (cert, drugs, nominations, etc) might be accepted or dismissed, so you can't bank on it.
Either the time is sufficient or not is immaterial, just present relevant witneses. About 10 of the 13 witnesses were disqualified because they have no capacity to speak on what they are saying. Imagine 10witness saying the result given to me at PU is Z while what was declared is Y, That's how the court has always want to see allegations of manipulation.

Shattuck:
this is were the tribunal is wrong and why we say it is bias, it is not the duty of the tribunal to decide which evidence labour party should tender in court, provided whatever evidence they tender is legal and justify their case. It's just like a rape crime scene, imagine me taking a rapist to court that a rape occur and I present a CCTV footage of the event, and the judge dismissing my claims saying I should have presented a DNA as evidence,. Does this makes sense, when a CCTV footage can also serve as evidence, this is why I believe they were bias.

Smiles. I will speak on your analogy.
You present a cctv footage of the event, that is a first hand evidence, what will made the court request for a DNA is the accused claiming he is not the one in the footage.
Your agent is the first hand witness, they are the reason you are filing the petition ab initio (the only reason why you can claim you win or lose any election without considering the declared results is because of the information you got from your people on field), if you can't bring your people armed with evidence, how do you want anyone to trust a 3rd party to be speaking the truth?
See it this way, you had a biz transaction with me, both of us having witnesses, we all have a duplicate copy of the transaction, then I claim that there is a breach from you, in presenting evidence, I refused to bring my witness or tender my own copy of the transaction, I then insisted that you should go bring your own copy and your witness, if you are a judge, what would be your verdict?

Shattuck:
maybe I'll try and see the clip of the rivers case.

It wasn't a response specific for Rivers, it was a response for the petition itself.
A summary of it; she said the petitioner(referring to LP) claimed to have 138k+ agents at different PU and collation level with the agents having copy of the result given at the various level, and they also have the privilege of moving with the PO or collation officers from one level to the other, but they could not present a copy of any of the result given to any of those 138k+ agents neither do they presented any of such agent as a witness, that irrespective of the fact that Inec didn't give some necessary documents as alleged, the agents are in position to tender the copy given to them.
So of all the witness called by LP, no agent was called.

Shattuck:
I get your point but I still think the judges were biased though, like in the rivers case for example it was more than just a polling unit it was the summation of the entire state today which today it was proven obi won, it that case I don't think obi's lawyers needed to break it down to the polling units because it wasn't even the polling unit that were contested it was the state and the evidence were even justified by the certified true copies issued by inec, which is a legal evidence in court, I still repeat obi may not have proven he won but he definitely was able to prove irregularities, which the tribunal never even addressed, another of its bias I noticed was when they refused to accept EU's report because it want presented by an EU official, by their logic if I should precent my school certificate in court it would can be declared ineligible because it wasnt presented personally by the vice chancellor of my institution, how does this even makes sense.

Take a time to watch the response of that female judge, you will get why the Rivers case couldn't have been looked into.
If you present your sch certificate in court, the court won't honor it, your sch must present a CTC to affirm that you are the owner of such certificate, or you request for a subpoena from the court to your sch to come present the cert. Also note that you can't request for a subpoena to a staff of your sch, you have to request it to the sch, it's the school that will send someone to represent it

Shattuck:
I like how you emphasized on facts, obi might not have proven, he won, neither did tinubu prove he got 8m votes, obi won rivers base on facts even from inec right now, how then was he still declared winner when he couldn't defend all his votes especially the one from rivers, when you analyze the fact objectively, if I were the judge, yes I wouldn't declare obi winner if he can't prove how he won, but neither will I acknowledge tinubu's victory because he also couldn't prove how he won and got 8m votes neither did inec prove how he got 8m votes, taking into consideration inec declared him winner in rivers initially, but further evidence proved inec manipulation for him as he didn't win Rivers among other states which evidence were presented. That's how you give justice, for me obi was not able to prove how he got more votes than tinubu but he was able to prove manipulation, tinubu was also not able to defend how he got 8m votes neither was inec able to defend the integrity and accuracy of the votes. So why then did the tribunal give it to tinubu? This is my issue with the verdict if you are unbiased you would see reasons too

In election petition, burden of proof is on petitioner, and it is beyond reasonable doubt, not a test of probability.
The petitioner is the one alleging irregularity, what he needs to do is to present the irregularity in specifics, inec nor the declared winner won't help him do that.
Eg, PU 3, ward 5, MIT LGA, Got state, the result as announced at the PU and signed by agents with a copy given to our agent TP 40, GP 35, BP 80, in the announced result, Inec declared TP 75, GP 40, BP 40.
that is a proof of irregularity, Inec will need to explain the difference if that result presented by the petitioner is truly gotten from the PU.
The scenario above is different from saying Inec changed all or most of our results, the declared results isn't correct. The question would be, is it possible for Inec to change result from more than a thousand PU.
If you go through the petitions, you will noticed that no where was any figure stated as deduction or addition to any of the parties by the petitioner, court won't manufacture figures for you, you present it and they consider the argument you have in advocating for the figures.
Another option is PU cancelling, you have to show that a cancelled PU possible votes is more than the margin of victory, that way, a rerun would be ordered in such PU or ward or area as the case may be.
SC has mentioned it times without number, but lawyers are still going to tribunal to present case without due diligence

Oga lawyer, all facts are true, what you are holding on to is belief, not fact. For a statement to be fact, it must be true, so if you can't establish for statement to be true, then it's just a belief.
The only way you can say Obi won the election is by giving figures of where you noticed manipulations, you can't just go about shouting that your client won, you are learned not unlearned, act like one.

Hmmmm, with this PR work, I'm sure a scandal is about to come up.
There has been no News (good or bad) about the CofS of recent, so this PR is a foundation for something coming. Let's keep tab