Paniki's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Paniki's Profile › Paniki's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 38 pages)
It means Nigeria |
LOL |
babaowo:All the notes [img]http://desmond.yfrog.com/Himg875/scaled.php?tn=0&server=875&filename=fkebm.jpg&xsize=640&ysize=640[/img] |
China's peaceful rise - a term coined by chinese thinktanks many years ago to explained what was to become Chinese dominance. That's what we need in Africa, we need thinktanks. Organisations filled with black experts who only live to think and create knowledge and suggest policies that can be used by people in their country and the government for the benefit of the counrty and its people. |
igbo2011 is the paranoid version of cap28 |
Hail China! Each year they add to their economy the equivalent of the economies of most African countries combined. Hail China! |
igbo2011:Hahahahahahaha Well, he's set to be overthrown in December during the ANC elective conference, the same as what happened to Mbeki five years ago. He is increasingly losing favour with his party people. So what conspiracy do you have now? |
Hail China |
The title of the article should read "White South African Schools To Drop Zulu And Xhosa, Stirring Debate" The article starts off with "South African Model C primary schools, " that immediately means that the author is talking about the small percentage of white schools for those who know what "Model C" means. The bad article then gives enrollment numbers without correctly explaining what they mean. So now the gullible reader will conclude that the South African 12th grade class does not exceed 68,455 plus a few thousand more who take other languages. This article only succeeds in misleading those who don't know South Africa's education system. The article if it was any good would've explained that school kids have to take two languages: one being the mother tongue which is called "home language", the second being any other official language which is called "first additional language" The majority of the learners take English as a second language followed by Afrikaans simply because the education system has always been geared towards these two languages For the benefit of the gullible reader I have looked up enrollment numbers for the 12th year class of 2010. https://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/419953_2842452134606_1058426352_2425803_1187448965_n.jpg https://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/428147_2842461094830_1058426352_2425805_159211826_n.jpg REPORT ON THE NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION RESULTS • 2010 |
Funny that such a article pops up when parliament is drafting a language bill that seeks to promote all 11 official languages plus sign language. http://www.iol.co.za/the-star/controversial-language-bill-exercises-mps-minds-in-english-1.1220519 http://www.pmg.org.za/report/20120117-south-african-languages-bill-b23-2011-public-hearings-day-1 |
Americans |
Mobinga:Private photobucket account? Are you sure about that? Maybe you are too lazy to do a simple search. And for a person who claims to have read SOPA you seem not to know how the bill defines and proposes to deal with file sharing. I suggest you read some more. |
Mobinga:Why would I encourage dullards like you and dripstoil to familiarise yourselves with a proposed law that I have not read? Dripstoil held a misguided view, which he has now sidestepped, that an America law can regulate internet entities which are not based in or have any links to America and you promoted a fallacy that this law will cause damage. What kind of damage? And damage to who? Idiots like you must realise that this law if passed will only force internet entities to work harder to be compliant the same way they work hard to comply with Chinese regulations. These internet companies are using lay fools like you as megaphones that speak in favour of their own agenda to dodge this law because it will only affect their bottom line since they have to spend more money to keep order. Of cause that flies over your flat head. Regardless :You should've started by quoting this, just a few lines before your quote (1) the Internet site or portion thereof is a U.S.-directed site and is used by users in the United States Then a bit further on you should've quoted this (i) IN GENERAL.—A service provider shall take technically feasible and reason able measures designed to prevent access by its subscribers located within the United States to the foreign infringing site (or portion thereof) that is subject to the order, including measures designed to pre8 vent the domain name of the foreign in9 fringing site (or portion thereof) from re10 solving to that domain name’s Internet Protocol address. Such actions shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may order. You need to understand that America doesn't own the internet and that these internet companies which will be subject to American law in America have separate entities in other jurisdictions which are subject to other laws. There is a difference between google.com - google.co.uk - google.com.hk and so on. |
^^^^^^ I don't know why you refuse to read that proposed law so that you can understand for yourself. You prefer to be indoctrinated by American hype which has made you believe that a Nigerian website will be subject to American law. You need to broaden your outlook my friend. |
Mobinga:Look at this blockhead parrot that recites propagandistic mantras belonging to internet hypocrites Google and company. Parrots usually have no clue of what they talk about but they sound very intelligent when they repeat other peoples thoughts. Because of your honorary parrot status I doubt that you will be able to tell me what exactly will those "damages" be, unless of cause you regurgitate more junk that is composed by internet brainwash agents. These internet hypocrites are able to function very well under the draconian cyber laws of China which seek not to protect intellectual property but to advance communist agenda. Now switch on your brain and let it process an answer for the following question: If Google and company in China can comply with Chinese law and block websites which the Chinese government considers to be "disturbing the peace" why then can't Google and company comply with American law and block websites which infringe on intellectual property and copyright laws? BTW. This is an American law that has no bearing on any internet entity that is not based in America or linked to American enterprise. Please read that proposed law and form your own opinion based on your reading and not second hand thoughts. |
dripstoil:LOL. And you think that you understand SOPA? The truth is that you kind of understand the sensationalist rubbish given by commentators to mislead ill-informed people like you If SOPA is in place, this nairaland will find it difficult to exist because Seun will have to check every comment made on nairaland and approve themLOLz. You have been misled to believe that a law in America will have jurisdiction in a sovereign country like Nigeria. This shows lack of independent thinking, you just accept rubbish from analysts without scrutinising it. Or if your friend upload your picture on facebook and you don't like it, you could close facebook down!!LOLz As Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian explained, PIPA and SOPA are “the equivalent of being angry and trying to take action against Ford just because a Mustang was used in a bank robbery.”Even till today propaganda still works on the gullible. Do yourself a favour and read the law http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/112%20HR%203261.pdf |
Has MLK's dream come true? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 38 pages)
