Covert1: In your head of course and making your life difficult via tutelage that what exists on paper or your videos for your military are not actual realities which have not in modern times been replicated in a real battle situaton which the day you start growing up to grasp will make life easier for you.
"Things that you constantly do in training, are not things you can actually do"
lionel4power: Everything is hush-hush concerning your Hawks.
But the Hawks themselves don't have radar I'm I correct?
There was actually a time the British used their Hawks as a second line of defense.
No, the data is transmitted digitally via Link-ZA (data-link) from nearby sensor nodes, be it ground based radar or Gripen and then displayed for the pilot like in any normal jet.
I am not sure as to just what capabilities this provides, I would assume it allows the Hawk to employ radar-guided weaponry as it can now feed targeting data to the weapon. I do know however that the Hawk 120 can fire IR missiles as standard.
lionel4power: Is your Hawks weaponized, I have never come across a picture of it carrying bombs. Care your share any??
More than just "weaponized"
It uses link-ZA to form a "radar" that allows it to engage air-to-air targets, either for training (by simulating the targets) or for actual combat
ATE explains that the radar simulation air-to-air target generation has two modes: Virtual formations can be generated within the system itself and simulated as radar targets. This function allows for single-aircraft radar simulation exercises. Secondly, up to eight co-operating aircraft can acquire each other as radar targets through Link ZA, a digital network protocol that uses one of the Hawk's three Reutech Defence Industries ACR500 U/VHF radios. Link ZA ensures that every aircraft continuously transfers positional data to every other. This data is then processed by the mission computer on the co-operating aircraft in the network to render a real-time radar page. Displayable on any of the six multi-function displays (MFDs) in the LIFT's tandem glass cockpit, the radar page provides the pilot with radar target information, as if the aircraft were fitted with a real fire control radar system.
jln115: Was using Angola as an example since that was the country Lionel4power was using as an example.
In terms of the discussion me and Lionel were having(that you rudely interrupted) the actual ability for SAAF to attack Angola is completely irrelevant.
Moot point,
The discussion has already been had RE: Angolan Su-30K v Gripen - I believe a senior member of 2 Squadron did a presentation while as a notable South African defence analyst wrote an article on the topic.
I believe the conclusion was that if the Gripen were armed with BVR missles, the Angolans would lose. But without BVRM the Gripen would (obviously) lose. In the hypothetical example BVRM specifications and logistical issues were excluded as variables.
Covert1: The NNSBS is SEAL qualified for the full-spectrum of all special Ops in any terrain or weather. They are the best in this region. No one comes close. That I can tell you. Except someone leaks something I have no official source for you since much of what they do is officially classified.
Covert1: You don't get the NNSBS badge without SEAL level qualification and that includes HAHO/HALO, submarine operations and under water demolitions and combat etcetera. The NNSBS also incorporates courses for qualification not only peculiar to the US Navy SEALS.
ssaengine: You want a country not at war with anyone, not even publicly arguing with anyone, to have 15+ Gripen hot and ready to takeoff within the next 30 mins? Lmao
I've never really read through your posts on here, but I always assumed you knew what you were talking about. You would be hard pressed to find any air force not currently involved in operations, with more than 60% of it's fighter fleet ready at any moment.
I think the Germans are even below 50% at the moment.
Germans are sub 30% mate.
I think their helo fleet was running at something like 10%. I will look it up on my lunch break.
Covert1: [s]Meanwhile with all the noise and no action translated on to a real-life battle situation from military pretenders who could do nothing about Zimbabwe, DRC, Burundi, Madagascar and has left the SADC drifting with totalitarian semantics—The Nigerian Air Force along with it's sister services the Army and Navy are getting the job done with proven assets from Africa's most extensive satellite capability to Africa's most sophisticated ISR capability to unmanned precision strike capability and sustained Air-RECCE & Interdiction in real-life battle spaces through direct military intervention and or military diplomacy/gunboat diplomacy (show of force/threat of the use of force) to get hardened dictators and non-state actors to acquiesce and capitulate to do Abuja's bidding as we saw in The Gambia and elsewhere in furtherance of Nigeria's national security imperatives which centerpiece is peace and security of the homeland and continent of Africa.[/s]
"We duh best cuz we got dat C-130 drop dem 12 guys in Gambia"
Henry240: Off-course the Nigerian Air Force has a long way to go. I'm also not bragging, not just platforms, welfare of officers, operational effectiveness, healthcare, housing, schools, training which Air Force in sub-Saharan Africa has better service than the Nigerian Air Force?
Covert1: Poised tri-service combatant forces of Africa's giant and largest economy Nigeria capable of multi-spectrum warfare not on paper but in undeniable real-life deployments & operations.
Can you cite examples of air-mobile operations for us?
"b..but we used a C-130 to transport some guys from A to B"
No, actual air-mobile operations - paradrops, air-assault etc