₦airaland Forum

shizzle11: LWKMD...i didnt see no banana, i only saw a pr1ck with balls/and or arsSe

Lol

cococandy: Logic as defined by you.
Now he's being logical

It is alright.

I'll remember.that's all.

logic...yes.....not sentiments

Mondisweets: if i see my sister sniffing cocaine and i decide to do the same, does that make it legal?

Going to your parent wedding
How is that a violation

I thought SA recognised homosexual legally
What's the beef

Nonso23: Mine has been concrete all through.
Yours has been a dance in circles at best. From assumptions galore to extracting facts from thin air, to basing arguments on works of fiction and finally to quoting half sentences just to prove a non existent point.

Instead of her to accept she is this vexed because a woman was not given full custody she is arguing up n down...


Mondi..are u sure u r lawyer

Mondisweets: 1.) the children went to the first ceremony against their will. Violation of the right to freedom of choice and association, where they actually have a right to choose to do, or not to something.

2.) underage children being taken to bars and displaying provocative art in a house minor children live in. This can be detrimental to the wellbeing of a child and it also violates a child's right to psychological integrity.


3.) underage children being taken to LGBT films. If you have watched any gay films, you would know the amount of sex scenes in it, that can never be suitable for minor children. Again it affects a child's right to psychological integrity.

And other parents don't do this?


Are u saying the father who issue the legal guardian of the children violated the will of minors by taking them to his wedding ceremony which is allowed by the state ...puhleezze....that means if a woman is remarrying a man..d stepkids attending her wedding is a violation

At the second ceremony, which included more than twenty couples, local news stations and papers were there to document the first gay weddings officiated in our state. USA Today did a photo journal shoot on my ex and his partner, my children, and even the grandparents. I was not notified that this was taking place, nor was I given a voice to object to our children being used as props to promote same-sex marriage in the media.

She has no point..she should go to court to prove misuse of authority


On going to.film festivals or transgender games
This is normal n is d lifestyle of d parents

A gay kid is also forced to normal events ..but caant do anything until he or she is 18

U r arguing without facts

cococandy: Just saw this.
Lmao.
When will you begin to try to be a bit honest?
So LGBT movement fueled by feminism isn't part of the anti-family tools the devil is using to ruin God's work on earth?
The president of the conspiracy theorists association now suddenly thinks there's no grand conspiracy somewhere.
And now he's suddenly 'liberal' enough to accept that they are who they are and can't change themselves.
Now he doesn't have anything against liberal societies anymore.
I'll remember this for a loooooong time to come.
Bwahahahahah.
Oh I'll remember.
Good to have you in the midst of the liberals.
Tuface.
I dey come.

Your problem is that you don't use logic to make points
Scientists have shown that what was called deviance isnprmal.
Who am I to argue with it

U r behaving Just like d archaic old men who believed that earth was flat

I don't need to join ur camp

Science or nothing...

If science shows incêst is normal..then laws will change

Lol...this banana pic is funny

Mondisweets: please point out the woman's rights that she claimed to be violated because all i saw was a violations of the rights and wellbeing of minor children. I would really love for u to show us specifically where she referred to women's rights...

Which violation of child rights did u see

cococandy: I don't believe some women are unfit mothers?


Me who says (on several threads) that not everyone who's female was born to be a mother. Citing examples of those who even dump theirs at the waste bins in the dead of night.
Telling women not to get pressured into marriage or having babies when they are not yet ready because the society dictates so.

Like I said before,you'll keep exposing yourself as someone who set out to ALWAYS misunderstand me.

Suit yourself.
Before you go chanting your shifting the goal post phrase again:

Saying a mother is usually the primary care giver doesn't mean all women were born to be mothers. Same as saying a man is the primary provider doesn't mean all men are born providers. Some don't just have it in them.

As far as you keep picking parts of my posts which suit your percieved image of me while ignoring the other parts that seeks to put a balance to my general opinions,you'll keep making such unfounded comments like the bolded.


If you'd noted that my first post on this thread says I suspect the woman doctored the story,that should have been enough to prove to you I think the judge gave the man custody (even when the supposed primary care giver is alive) for reasons she didn't state in her narrative.
Which means I understand she could have been at fault.
The only other optiong being bias on the judge's part. But first most likely because she wasn't fit. As is CLEARLY implied in my first post

Which means your post @ bolded is trash.

Noted...

cococandy: If nothing happened that would warrant the man being the person most fit to take primary care of the kids,then she has a right to complain.

But like I said before,she could have doctored the story to suit her audience if not,then she's the wronged party here.

The judge was quoted to have said 'if I could give you more,I would'

What's does that mean?

I believe you're smart enough to know that comment didn't just up and come out from his mouth.

The woman must have been proven grossly incompetent to take care of the kids.
If not.

It spells nothing else but bias.

If I have to explain that to you,why wouldn't I want to give up?
Like who needs to get an explanation for that comment?

It means she was not fit to be a mother or granted primary custody

But of course you don't believe some women are unfit to be mothers


Appeal to female instincts never dealing with d issue

cococandy: One wonders what's really your opinion about gays transgender and incestuous couples is.

Are you for or against?
All I can see is you slyly trying to pit one against another without actually making your stand know. Yet you've the effrontery to ask me what my opinion abouts gays is.

All still sentiments
I have made my opinion on gays known

They r who they are and they can't change it
Science has shown that to be so also

That's the fact on ground but you as usual spout some spiel about pitting one camp or sly

There is no conspiracy here...

cococandy: What did you type that I didn't write?
Ok
Full custody, primary custody and shared/joint custody are one and the same thing.

Happy?

I said joint custody is usually the way unless one parent is seen as unfit to be with the kids unsupervised.
I said too that she would not have been complaining if they got joint custody.

Now you u bring a text saying the same thing to use and try 'disagree' with me?

I give up

Don't give up

If she got joint custody but the man had primary custody.. Why is she complaining

After all thousands of men get joint custody but thee woman gets primary custody and are expected to suck it up


Why do u say d judge is this case is biased.. Coco?

cococandy: And another research shows that when this gender reassigment sugery if done after puberty,it is not the same as one done before then. Because the hormone therapy may give you outward feminine features but will not undo what has been done internally before.
If so they should be growing wombs too. The female hormones given to them should be able to change them that much. But it doesn't.

So is it generally accepted science?
No.

Do I understand why the board agrees?
Yes. To avoid LGBT promoters having one on them in the law court.
Since they can now provide some study that backs their claims.



I don't call you mischievious because of your different opinion.
I call you that for reasons you know well.

Like claiming I shift goal posts when you can't bring a post to prove that.

Or suddenly becoming an LGBT activist because you like the idea that a woman was bashed that time.
Or becoming an incesst rights promoter because you thought it would make you have over gay folks.

Erm who was even shifting goal posts again?
You prolly have as many colors as the rainbow.

Again I. Ask u what is your opinion on. Homosexuality

You. Still don't get it...

Thee same reasons that granted them rights ensure that in 20 y...incestous marriage will be allowed

On the beating...I'm not a woman beater

I'm not interested in gay folks or gettin likes from them


Science says they can't help who they are
Rather its selective bigots like you who r the dangerous ones.


They feel like a woman who was unfortunately born as a man
Its a science

Read up coco



You allocate rights based on your feelings or want to sterilise them because it feels iffy to u..

However if I had gender disorder n could change my sex and I love MMA
I will fight women.. Simple

Its not sentiments...all what u've been saying is just sentiments

cococandy: Full custody is when one parent gets the kid and the other can visit per supervised court arrangement.

Shared custody is when the kids are allowed to stay with each parent alternatively with same ratio or more less same ratio based on school schedule.

If they had joint custody,she wouldn't be complaining.


You're the one with no point.
But classic you thinks you do.

And they tell you that parents with joint custody don't complain

You actually believe what u write...

Even in joint custody..the parent with primary custody makes all d calls

Read up..coco

Joint child custody is typically the preferred custody arrangement in most courts. A joint custody or shared custody arrangement allows parents to share physical custody of the child. In addition, the court may also order parents to share legal custody of the child or it may grant legal custody to one parent. In general, it is the court's view that a joint custody arrangement serves the best interests of the child. However, parents must also be prepared to work through the disadvantages of joint child custody, such as:

http://singleparents.about.com/od/jointcustody/a/joint-child-custody-disadvantages.htm

Mondisweets: so u think he left his wife to be with a gay lover he has never been intimately involved with before? Lets use ordinary common sense here, why do u think they are called homoSEXUALS and heteroSEXUALS

Your common sense is not common yo all
As a lawyer that u never fail to disclose here.. You of all should know that facts are sacrusanct not theories or obtuse spouting...

You can define the custody for us..

cococandy: Is it my opinion that he is stronger or is that a fact?

You need to read up...coco.n stop calling other peoples views mischievous since they don't tally with yours

Your opinion.. No research backs your claim which is just Beer parlor gist

Even the Olympic committee is on board n u come here saying stuff

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4918835


Fundamentally, though, it shows a lack of awareness of the current medical thought on the issue of transgender athletes. The overwhelming consensus is that after some period of time on hormone replacement therapy (HRT), transgender individuals should be allowed to compete in accordance with their legal gender.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) settled the issue of transgender athletes in 2004, when they released the rules for them to compete. The IOC rules boil down to three basic points:

They must have had gender reassignment surgery.
They must have legal recognition of their assigned gender.
They must have at least two years of hormone therapy.
Given these conditions, the IOC does not consider being transgender an unfair advantage.

Mondisweets: If a straight man/woman's infidelity during her/his marriage can influence whether he/she gets custody of the children or not after divorce, the law should not be any lenient on homosexuals either.

Where in d post did u read he was unfaithful

cococandy: So standing for all in this case would be supporting the judge who gave custody of the kids to the partner who wronged the other?

No one says his marriage is illegal.

Even if it was a woman who just stood up and left for no reason or wrong doing on the man's part,as long the man didn't do anything to warrant his kids being stripped from him,they get JOINT custody.

Even as a woman is the primary care giver at the younger ages.
I'll never support a man to be denied his kids for NO REASON.

Bring a quote of mine to prove me otherwise

If he was abusive or is a danger to them then it is different.

At least a fair judgement here would be joint custody if all happened according to the woman's account.
And unless there's a good reason for the kids not to be with their mother,then the judge was biased.

Admit that you're being mischievous.
Simple.

Still u persist in this path ....now its me being mischievous....

When will u start correcting my grammar since u have no points

What do u mean by full custody

They had joint custody only that the father had primary custody
She can see her kids whenever she wants subject to the court ordered arrangements

Why do u do this...coco why

These days u just argue n u don't even read d full story...

Try as I might to save our marriage, there was no stopping my husband. Our divorce was not settled in mediation or with lawyers. No, it went all the way to trial. My husband wanted primary custody of our children.

RayMcBlue: I don't know what to make of them at this point, but one thing I can authoritatively surmise from what I have seen so far is the fact that those creatures are áss kickers. The have a plan, they are organise, they have the weapons, and they are motivated. I don't know why they kidnapped Gus though.

I think they are the mindful infected who broke from d control of the master


Or someone who is also n original infected who is not comfortable with d masters plan similar to matt in vampire diaries


Anarchists while their motives sound pure ultimately do more harm than good
At times..not all info should be known

Eg because of dutch actions...the infection spread faster
In 24...the anarchists compromised national security


The worst is that they eventually succumb to greed like d pigs in animal farm

cococandy: Bceause it should be pretty obvious to someone with sense that a someone who grew up as a man will be an unfair match to someone who grew up as a woman.

So like I ALWAYs say. And like y'all ALWAYS mischieously choose to ignore,rights are no rights when they affect someone else negatively.

Eesh.

I think that will do.

You still decide to keep one track
The transgender is a woman n the law recognises her as a woman
The mma licensed her to fight

Why should ur opinion count when the law is clear

cococandy:
I guess everyone is getting off on antagonizing cococandy today.

When you decide to be not mischievous,you can bring a quote from any post of mine that spcifically goes against whatever I've typed here today.

But you won't because you know I'll still prove how you've deliberately choosen to misunderstand it.

No one is getting off on you..

Its your metamorphic ability to be seen as standing for all n nothing at the same time with your live and let live mantra.

I hope u realize that the writer of the article is a bigot and thus is biased against gay marriages which are equal to heterosexual marriage

Remember the children's best interests r considered by the judge

Remember your views on being true to yourself
This man lived a lie to blend into society
He decided enough was enough
He left
Live m let live

If this was a man speaking..you would narry spare a tear for him

From d blog

My children and I have suffered great losses because of my former husband’s decision to identify as a gay man and throw away his life with us. Time is revealing the depth of those wounds, but I will not allow them to destroy me and my children. I refuse to lose my faith and hope. [b]I believe so much more passionately in the power of the marriage covenant between one man and one woman today than when I was married. There is another way for those with same-sex attractions. [/b]Destruction is not the only option—it cannot be. Our children deserve far better from us.

This type of devastation should never happen to another spouse or child. Please, I plead with you: defend marriage as being between one man and one woman. We must stand for marriage—and for the precious lives that marriage creates.

Janna Darnelle is a mother, writer, and an advocate for upholding marriage between one man and one woman. She mentors others whose families have been impacted by homosexuality.

She is biased
Her personal opinions don't matter
The law is clear
Homosexual marriage is legal

RayMcBlue: Like she told Vas, she loved her Dad very much and only became an hacker because of him. So yeah, she has a little Daddy issue but it her general issues goes beyond that. Not everything is black and white, you know?

OK....

Except u want us to discuss anarchist collectives

Have u seen 24 s9

Nonso23


https://www.nairaland.com/1920015/having-being-male-nursery-teacher

RayMcBlue: Eph's team or the ones hunting their own kind?

The others

OK..
Enjoy your wave less feminism...

cococandy: A non feminist who knows more than all others .

If you're speaking of waves,

What about the first wave(the girls right to vote and education bla bla bla) which is considered outphased, but is still on going some parts the world or only just recently phased out.


Or in this part of the world Nigeria where feminists are more about women being allowed to be themselves and what they chose to do without being defined or confined to a particular role?

Can we say different waves of feminism is on-going in different parts of the world?
Meaning that no waves is truly totally phased out.

Simple points are hard for you to grab sometimes.(Or you chose not to)
My point is that wave or no waves,feminism is basically the same thing everywhere.

Else we would have to look for 3 different definitions for each.
No point nitpicking to make one seem more less different and maybe hopefully acceptable to the anti-feminists.

RayMcBlue: I respectfully disagree. Dude has potential.

As for Dutch, it goes beyond mere daddy issues. Hers was a story about a young girl who left home at a very young age. Found herself in a cold unrelenting harsh world where "survival" is the only way to stay ahead of the game. She got the smarts, tech savvy and most importantly - like most hackers - despised the government. Someone like that doesn't need a lot of convincing to create chaos with just a few strokes of the keyboard. I'm not saying that I approved of what she did, but I can relate.

That Gus can be redeemed is not excusing the stùpidity of his actions bringing the vamp into the city

Dutch is an anarchist.yes
But her actions and her preference for mutually destructive relationships all stem from daddy issues

Classic daddy issues


What's ur hunch on the vamp killers

Nonso23: I could recall that transgender thread how they rallied together to establish the superiority of the women rights over LGBT rights. I was too amused to reply meaningfully.

The emboldened. Same with me. Unless anything that violates women rights is now a crime

You can never catch these peeps
They are slippery


There's a thread about male teachers of nursery school kids....

Very interesting debate

Our NL equality advocates were against it surprisingly considering they spout abolition of gender roles up n down.

Have u seen it...


When they get the kids...all is well and the judge did it in the best interests of the kids

Otherwise...the judge is biased

A feminist who does not know the history of the movement..the waves are important madam

Cococandy

Nonso23... Superb points


You should know our ladies only see their own right as paramount.

Astute observation on cococandy's posts going this way or that..

I will have thought she will be happy that the man can now be with the love of his life and the judge made the best decisions in the interest of the kids

Except she is now saying judges make mistakes in mostly awarding kids to their mums

..

cococandy: Lame excuse.

One could as well ask why he married. He would have just kept having strings of girlfriends to conceal it.

Which society? Their pro gay society forced him to conform?

The anti gay society
Before it was decriminalized....did u not read d post before mine

Seems u r on attack mode

Naijasinglegirl: I tell yah

Our keenness to do follow follow..eh?

RayMcBlue: Sacrifice has been a major theme running throughout this first season of The Strain, but as the clock ticks down towards next week’s finale, a sense remains that, for everything that the characters have lost so far, it still won’t be enough.

"Episode 12" sees a last-ditch effort by Eph and the group come together, with the aim of informing the general public about the strain. And though that plan appears successful, the only thing that’s clear when the dust settles is that the group remains hopelessly outmatched. Every time they cut down a vamp, another five are there to take its place.

The most annoying of the lot is the girl who hacked d internet because of daddy issues


Gus lost his brother mother and beat friend

Stūpid guy