₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,661 members, 8,513,018 topics. Date: Wednesday, 04 November 2026 at 11:16 AM

Toggle theme

Porka's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Porka's Profile › Porka's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 (of 109 pages)

Politics › Re: States with The Best Infrastructure In Nigeria by porka: 12:32am On Jul 05, 2012
cyril83: says who FG invested oil money in lagos,if you say agriculture money fine![b]since the advent of this crude oil,tinubu and fash can account di amount FG had invested to the state...[/b]have you forgotten that obasanjo refused to pay allocation to lagos for years...@op you ursef know appropriate answer to this question,even if you ask a new born baby he will definately tell you LASGIDi
Haba!!!

Fashola was not even born when oil was discovered (the advent), he was probably in primary school when Gowon was building those bridges and roads you see with OIL money in the '70s.

The entire Festac Town was constructed in 1977 by Obasanjo.

Babangida completed the building of the Third Mainland Bridge in the early '90s.

Why don't you ask if you are not sure?
Politics › Re: Otedola Wants Public Hearing With Reps by porka: 10:35pm On Jul 04, 2012
Megabyts: When otedola gave the dollars to faruk it was behind closed doors,,likewise when he mate the policce.why then cant he meet the house commitee behind same closed doors?i think he is bent on ensuring the report is dumped.
When they were doing their circus show, called public hearing, it was televised live.

When Farouk removed Zenon Oil's name from the BLACK BOOK, it was in the open.

When Farouk was suspended from the headship of the Education Committee and the probe committee it was in the full glare of the public.
Politics › Re: Otedola Wants Public Hearing With Reps by porka: 10:28pm On Jul 04, 2012
[quote author=D'Soj]Why will Otedola dictate how the panel should sit.. Dats Nonsense.. Wen he went to sss, was it public?
Wen he went to police, was it public?
Wen Farouk was screened, was it public?
As long as its gonna be done in camera, wats d big deal... Forget all dis media propaganda and face d panel.
If Otedola wasn't a rich guy, would he av d effontry to be calling that shot.?
Absolute Nonsense....
Is he above d law? Cut the crap. If he doesn't go, the reps should order his arrest joor...[/quote]Ore, the gist is that Femi Otedola obeyed the House of Representatives' summons.

He can only be forced to come, which he already did anyway, if he did not honor the invitation, he cannot be forced to talk.

If he was not a rich guy, his lawyer would still have represented him.

You have a right to a legal representation in Nigeria, lawyers do pro bono every time.

My two kobo to Tambuwal, 'let go of Farouk, else, this case will consume you'.
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 2:11pm On Jul 03, 2012
Billyonaire: It is not necessary to criticize without first making efforts to research. Why do I have the courage to research and you just criticize without making efforts ? Its the difference between you and me. I find facts. Cos I am interested in the opportunities that might come.
I guess that courage made you dismiss the people calling for their website?

You should have simply point to the link instead of saying 'many companies don't run website', as if it's not necessary.

And in your research efforts, please point to where I criticize you without making efforts?
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 1:50pm On Jul 03, 2012
Billyonaire: Are you for real ? So you dont know about Better Business Bureau and you dont watch Bloomberg news on satellite TV, I weep for Nigeria. Go to the website and type "Vulcan" on the search bar.
You are mixing things up.

Slow down and read my replies.

It's not everyone here that is after your life, ok.

Some of us are for the projects.

You keep asking me to visit one website or another yet you said websites for firms are not necessary.

I asked you if the BBB stuff were not online, how then would I have checked it?

That means I have to physically travel to the US to get what I need.

Now that you have supplied it online, I don't have to.

Same way a firm's website would have solved so many questions.

For instance, serious firms would list their achievements and their directors details.

Which can then be verified elsewhere; from your almighty BBB etc.
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 1:37pm On Jul 03, 2012
Billyonaire: Seriously are you saying you can do business with company simply because you see website ? Jesus...go to better business bureau website to look legitimacy of companies in USA Better www.bbb.org
No, you won't hear me say that.

Serious companies should show-case their achievements transparently on their internet.

It's not that websites are anti serious business are they?

There's no serious business done without due diligence carried-out.

The link you just posted is a website isn't it?

Imagine you referring me to physically travel to the US in order to verify their claim.
Politics › Re: ACN, CPC To Finalise Merger Talks In October by porka: 1:28pm On Jul 03, 2012
ambrosini593: www.thisdaylive.com/articles/acn-cpc-to-finalise-merger-talks-october/119216/
Good for the country.

October is around the corner.

2015 is not far.

We are waiting.
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 1:18pm On Jul 03, 2012
Billyonaire: What are you talking about, so if a Nigerian journalist wrote the news, does it change the fact the Vulcan is bringing money to invest ? Or will you refuse investment because the company does not build a 100 thousand naira website ? So many companies dont even run websites.
Yes, so many companies don't run websites but serious companies should run websites. That's the first public interface.
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 1:04pm On Jul 03, 2012
johnnyemman: How can you sign such a contract with a company that does not have a website?..........Nigeria we keep fooling ourselves, this is another way of taking funds out of Nigeria, OBJ did the same with a chiness comapny abt rail road. How can you sign 4.5 Billion dollar with a company that does not have a website.
The bold refers.

No sir, Obj's contract with the Chinese on rail-road was terminated by Yaradua to the laughable applause of many Nigerians at that time.

Nigeria forfeited more than $500million on penalty though.
Business › Re: US Investors To Build 6 Refineries In Nigeria by porka: 12:58pm On Jul 03, 2012
likeme: So Nigeria's Trade Minister, Olusegun Aganga has signed an MOU with a certain Vulcan Petroleum to build 6 new modular refineries worth $4.5 billion... & I laugh in Swahili!

Well, in the first place no western investor will commit to building a new refinery in Nigeria just now. The Chinese state companies can build refineries but they would have bargained for other things.

It's just a total mess that Aganga is working just for the sake of getting activities on & not necessarily to achieve real change. I'm sure the way Aganga is discharging his duties to Nigeria is not the same way he managed his portfolio while at Goldman Sachs!

Sadly, the same Vulcan Energy signing this refinery deal is a subsidiary of Vulcan Capital who have a history of contract breaches & controversies.

The promoters of Vulcan Energy signed a contract with Sokoto state government in 2008 to build independent power plants in 6 months. Well after the exchange of millions of dollars & 4 years down the line, the IPP project is yet to see the light of the day!

Another Vulcan Capital's subsidiary was awarded a power plant contract in Iraq in 2004 and this was also marred with accusations of bribery & lawsuits on breach of contract.

Various cases of contract breaches have been filed & won against Vulcan in the US and oddly in some instances, some of the lawyers of Vulcan have withdrawn their legal services from Vulcan due to unpaid legal bills.

Well, Mr Aganga in his wisdom deems it fit to sign a refinery deal with an investment company (not even a refinery operator) with a chequered history. The question is how many refineries do Vulcan operate in the world currently?

Meanwhile it is obvious Nigeria does NOT need new refineries at the moment when it will be more cost effective & scalable to put our current refineries to work optimally.

Recently a refinery expert in the UK, who has consulted for various government & private owned refineries, including NNPC told me that, "Nigeria does not need new refineries just now. No serious investor will build new refineries in Nigeria. What Nigeria needs to do is to ensure the existing refineries are made fully functional & effective. But that might never happen!"

So the final question is why are top refinery operators in the world & major international oil companies not building refineries in Nigeria? Why is Aganga signing an MOU with "a certain" Vulcan Energy all in the bid to show that government is doing something? Well, do the maths! ...Tope
I think you have made a valid point in bringing to fore many controversies surrounding this company and its alleged parent company. We will continue to monitor things as they unfold.

However, to your question, please refer to Nigeria pre-MTN/Econet's adventure in 2001. Many people raised similar questions why the Oranges, the AT&Ts of this world did not show interest. Why some third rate telcos from Zimbabwe and South Africa? They asked. However, we have seen what their risk-averse, ask-questions-do-nothing, it-will-never-work, corruption-rife mentality has caused them. A life-time miss in opportunity to invest in a volatile but promising market.
Politics › Re: El-rufai On Boko Haram by porka: 11:52pm On Jun 29, 2012
boyendowed: True but El-rufai has made similar accusations before.

www.naijapundit.com/news/elrufai-blames-christians-for-boko-haram-bombings
Is it true that El Rufai has a political ambition?

This is the same guy who would tell you later that votes were rigged against him.

Why are people so dumb?

Nigeria has not collapsed yet, not likely to collapse soon.

Why not wait till you have an ethnic country before you publicly spew out this type of thing?
Christianity Etc › Re: “ GEJ To Bankrupt Nigeria” Sermon: Police Looking For Pastor Bakare by porka: 6:11pm On Jun 29, 2012
BBDelta: Home » News & Reports » News
“To Bankrupt Nigeria” Sermon: Police Looking For Pastor Bakare
Posted: June 28, 2012 - 15:42
Posted by siteadmin

caption: Pastor Tunde Bakare
By SaharaReporters, New York
The State Intelligence Bureau of the Nigeria Police was expected to question Tunde Bakare, a fiery Lagos pastor and political activist, this morning.

This followed an invitation letter, seen by SaharaReporters, which was sent to Pastor Bakare's church address on June 26.

Signed by CSP Usman Ayuba, the "invitation" followed an explosive sermon delivered by Pastor Bakare, who is also a top member of the Save Nigeria Group (SNG), on Sunday June 17. In it, he described President Goodluck Jonathan’s destiny as being “to bankrupt Nigeria," amongst other issues, in relation to the $6.8 billion oil subsidy scam.

A few days after the sermon was given, and following another press conference by the SNG in Lagos in which Pastor Bakare commented on the culpability of Mr. Otedola in the bribery scandal rocking the House of Representatives, Mr. Otedola’s lawyers fired a letter demanding retraction of the comments.

Pastor Bakare, according to his aides, is currently traveling outside Nigeria. It is unclear if the police plan to snatch him at the airport upon his return.

The pastor’s critical SNG has had the government in an uncomfortable stare-down before. In December 2010, the group visited President Jonathan in Abuja in connection with its advocacy of certain national policies.

On its way out of the presidential villa, the group was handed a $50,000 bribe, which it refused. The embarrassed government explained that the money was not a bribe, but “transport fare.”
Pastor Bakare subsequently ran for vice-president on the ticket of the Congress for Progressive Change. As pastor or political activist, he has always strongly criticized anti-people policies.
Source: http://saharareporters.com/news-page/%E2%80%9C-bankrupt-nigeria%E2%80%9D-sermon-police-looking-pastor-bakare
The SIB is questioning Tunde Bakare for what?

For 'preaching'?

They should not play into his hands.

They should leave him to make a fool of himself.

He loves doing that.

Questioning him for 'preaching' will only make him look like he is saying something reasonable.

That statement of destiny nonsense cannot incite anybody against a dog even.

Except it is for some other security matters though.
Politics › Re: Oshiomhole Survives Assassination Attempt by porka: 4:52pm On Jun 29, 2012
Billyonaire: https://serving.thisdaylive.com/0bef99d6-acf5-4e2c-9779-8fa02ba3fcd4/assets/290412N.Adams-Oshiomhole.jpg?maxwidth=400&maxheight=540
Comrade Adams Oshiomhole

Suspected political thugs yesterday attacked Edo State Governor, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, top government officials and stalwarts of the ruling Action Congress of Nigeria in Usen town, Ovia South West Local Government Area of the state.

A statement by the state Commissioner for Information and Orientation, Mr. Louis Odion, said the thugs, suspected to be agents of an opposition party, opened fired on Oshiomhole and others who were on a campaign for the July governorship election in the state in the area.
Yesterday’s incident was the second time Oshiomhole would escape death in two months since campaigns for the July 14 governorship election in the state gathered momentum.

The governor escaped by a whisker on April 29 when a tipper ran into his convoy on Auchi-Warrake road, during which three journalists were killed.

Odion said Oshiomhole, shortly after paying homage to the Onogie of Usen, His Royal Highness Oluogbe II, at his palace left at about 6pm when his convoy ran into a barricade not too far from the palace.

“Naturally, the security details attached to the governor came down to remove the bar. As they were clearing it, tens of heavily armed thugs emerged from nowhere and opened fire on the governor for several seconds.

“Dutifully, the brave security details attached to the governor, supported by an additional contingent of regular policemen deployed to maintain law and order, rose to the occasion. They were able to shield the governor, key government functionaries and others, including top leaders of Edo Action Congress of Nigeria, to safety without sustaining any human casualty.

“But several official vehicles, including Toyota Landcruisers, Hilux pick-up vans and Toyota Corolla saloon cars, were either badly damaged or riddled with bullets.

“Apparently annoyed that they missed their target, the thugs later descended on the near-by police post and vandalised it,” the statement added.

The state government, while condemning the attack on the governor, however, urged politicians to play by the rules and not to resort to violence as a campaign strategy.

The statement added that but for the restraint displayed by the governor’s team, there could have been heavy casualty toll in the attack.

The government urged the people to remain calm and law-abiding, so as not to play into the hands of those desirous of fomenting trouble out of fear that they might lose the election.

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/again-oshiomhole-escapes-death/118965/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Security Agents (aka Governor's Team) born and raised in Nigeria, trained in Nigeria showing restraint in apparent assassination attempt of a sitting Nigerian governor?

Were they working with the assassins?
Politics › Re: Lagos FRSC Didn’t Announce Closure Of 3rd Mainland Bridge by porka: 1:40pm On Jun 29, 2012
jerseyboy: Power Grab by an irrelevant useless and corrupt agency that is usurping work for local traffic corps. FRSC is a legacy of militarization of Nigeria from a federation into a unitary state. Scrap the FRSC and SAVE money.
Oga jerseyboy, na wa o.

Wole Soyinka, Olu Agunloye etc are not military men. FRSC is their brainchild.
Education › Re: Court Restrains FG From Renaming UNILAG by porka: 3:17pm On Jun 27, 2012
[quote author=israel ben-zion]Y are u advertising ur ignorance? Ever heard of d term checks and balances? So u hv never seen d Court restrain another arm of govt from doing an act declared unlawful by d Court? And dat it is before d Senate does not oust the jurisdiction of d Court, u hear?
If u don't knw how the legal system works, ask a lawyer.[/quote]Oga, no court stop the Parliament from enacting laws. The law can be set aside or repealed after passage if found to be inconsistent with the constitution.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 11:25pm On Jun 23, 2012
[quote author=ndu_chucks]You and the commander-in-chief who seems AWOL at the moment can trivialize the current situation all you want. To the rest of us and others who have been personally affected by the bombings and indiscriminate killings by JTF, we are at war. shi kena

Let us pray that bombs will not explode in your neck of the woods.[/quote]I sympathize with you on your personal losses.

However, your second sentence has disproved your first. If the commander-in-chief is AWOL as you claimed, there would not have been JTF.

Any reported indiscriminate killings will be investigated.

I join in your prayer to say AMEN!
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 11:02pm On Jun 23, 2012
[quote author=ndu_chucks]Nigeria is currently at war and these times call for unusual actions. The President should not fight the summons because fighting it does not help the security situation on ground. The President must be brave and comply.

Out of respect and cordiality, the summon had an open date to enable the President to honour it at a convenient time.[/quote]Oga Ndu, I salute.

Nigeria is NOT currently at war.

Nigeria has security issues in the Northern part.

The National Security Advisor and the Service Chiefs + the IG of Police are enough to answer any questions the NASS would need.

Issuing a summons to the president is not a respect.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 10:52pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: That link with the UNNAMED official is NOT an official rejection from the president. Be careful to wait to hear for one.

If anything, you, as a Citizen of this country, should be in support of Your president respecting the laws of the land. Not coming here to suggest that it is OK for the president to undermine the law because that part of the law has never been used before.

Do you need to hear of a summons first before you demand that THE LAW BE OBEYED since Yes, it is the LAW? What the heck kind of question/brain-fart is that?
Madam, laws are enforced.

A law is useless if it cannot be enforced.

This particular summons cannot be enforced effectively, i.e. nobody in Nigeria can compel(force/arrest)the president to obey the summons.

As a citizen, I will not support frivolities, or any exercise in futility or mere emotional outburst.

You and I know it has nothing to do with any law.

You know more than I do that no laws will give anybody being summoned the chance to fix the most convenient date by himself.

As per the UNNAMED official, we may wait till eternity to get an official response from a NAMED source.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 10:26pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: Points? All you have up there are your suppositions/your made-up theory of what could or might HAPPEN . . . Nothing factual in any wise, and nothing that changes the laws in any shape or form.

Again, learn to separate REALITY from the commotion in your head. I hate trying to dig into the minds of people when the issue does not call for it at all. Why in the world would I want to spend my day digging through that swamp when nothing has happened? What for? What the heck for?

So far all that has happened is that NASS has summoned the President, simple as that. For all you and I know, the president may supply NASS with a good enough reason for why he cannot attend. But so far it seems the President has yet to respond or ignore. He has not even suggested he will not go, and there is no FIRE on that mountain yet.
May be you should take a look at this...

http://www.punchng.com/news/northern-crisis-jonathan-to-ignore-reps-summons/

I like clever people like you madam.

Btw, have you ever heard or seen any summons without a date?
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 9:59pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: You are not smart at all. The consequences of the breaking the law is NOT HIDDEN from anyone. If you need to know what the consequence of subverting the constitution is, you need to read the document. It is clear what the consequences are should a president do such. GO READ THE DOCUMENT ALREADY TO LEARN LESSONS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY SAVE YOUR LIFE!!

Like I said, this thread is not about that so I will rather go ahead with the issue at hand.
No, I am not claiming to be smart.

I am only learning from you and you are proving to be a difficult teacher.

There would not have been any need for all this if you ponder with me that the consequence of issuing the summons is graver than what it intended to address.

1) Jonathan will not obey the summons. He won't because no president has been issued such summons. He won't because obeying will put future presidents at jeopardy, setting a precedence for any useless summons. He won't because his attendance will jeopardize security and intelligence efforts, even when they say it's a close-door session, anything he says there will find it way to the social media and the MSM the next minute.

2) Tambuwal's house might try to compel him through impeachment threats, since a Nigerian president cannot be arrested.

3) Impeachment threats will aggravate the security challenges that Tambuwal is "trying" to address, because Niger Delta militants will read ulterior motives into it.

4) If he refuses and there was no consequence(s), Tambuwal's House of Representatives would simply look funny in the eye of the public.

Those were my points ab initio but it seems you wanted us to go round and round.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 9:30pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: If all you are interested in is the extreme cases of when a President subverts the law, then you are probably on the wrong thread since this is not the thread for it. No well-meaning President should subvert the laws of the land, not even in Nigeria, especially since he swore an oath to uphold the laws within(he was sworn in under that constitution).

In the meantime, I suggest you study up your constitution.
I agree with you, we all need to study that document.

I can see you are trying to be clever.

If the framers of the constitution (or any laws for that matter) are so simple minded, then there won't be need for punishments.

In other words, they have in mind those extreme cases before they inserted the punishments.

If no punishments are inserted in laws, even the simple stuffs would be ignored by human beings, the president of Nigeria or any nation being human.

So who compels the attendance of Nigeria's president in NASS summons according to the constitution you have studied so much? As it appears that President Jonathan might not obey the summons.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 9:07pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: Again, a summons is NOT an arrest. But simply a summons. It is like saying calling you for Jury Duty is an arrest.

You only get a warrant out IF YOU fail to give a valid reason for not showing up. When you deliberately ignore the Law, there are consequences to follow . . in some cases, an arrest, in others possibly impeachment.

Now note how the latter is NOT DIRECTLY connected to the FIRST? YOU, by BREAKING THE LAW, Create the Opportunity for the second. No one is above the law . . . that is how it ought to be, even in Nigeria.
Please refer to my 1st question.

I'd ask what happens if one refuses to honor the summons, I didn't ask if a summons is same as arrest.

And your answer was an excerpt from the constitution which clearly says the person shall be compelled to attend the summons.

Now, who compels the President of Nigeria to attend the NASS summons is the question.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 8:55pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: I already did. You should learn to read. Go to the last post of mine in the previous page and re-read the included excerpts from the constitution which details exactly what should happen.
89. (1) For the purposes of any investigation under section 88 of this Constitutional and subject to the provisions thereof, the Senate or the House of Representatives or a committee appointed in accordance with section 62 of this Constitution shall have power to -

(a) procure all such evidence, written or oral, direct or circumstantial, as it may think necessary or desirable, and examine all persons as witnesses whose evidence may be material or relevant to the subject matter;

(b) require such evidence to be given on oath;

(c) summon any person in Nigeria to give evidence at any place or produce any document or other thing in his possession or under his control, and examine him as a witness and require him to produce any document or other thing in his possession or under his control, subject to all just exceptions; and

(d) issue a warrant to compel the attendance of any person who, after having been summoned to attend, fails, refuses or neglects to do so and does not excuse such failure, refusal or neglect to the satisfaction of the House or the committee in question, and order him to pay all costs which may have been occasioned in compelling his attendance or by reason of his failure, refusal or neglect to obey the summons, and also to impose such fine as may be prescribed for any such failure, refused or neglect; and any fine so imposed shall be recoverable in the same manner as a fine imposed by a court of law.

(2) A summons or warrant issued under this section may be served or executed by any member of the Nigeria Police Force or by any person authorised in that behalf by the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives, as the case may require.

If this is your answer, then we'll proceed to the next question;

How do you compel a person, since you are trying to separate that from arrest?

How will Speaker Tambuwal compel President Jonathan to obey his summons?
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 8:39pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: Did you even bother reading the response I posted which includes all that? See what I mean? Many of you are just here to post responses, and UNSUBSTANTIATED claims, without necessarily taking time to read the contents presented you.
Why not answer a simple question?
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 8:35pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: [size=14pt]Learn Your Constitution!!![/size] cause that is the only way you learn your right as a citizens and an individual in this union.
Ok. I am ready to learn from you.

Shall we go now?

If the constitution says anyone can be summoned by the NASS for any reason, what happens if s/he refuses? Say me or you for instance.
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 8:27pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: Since it seems a lot of you are simply here to argue blindly. Let me help you




While the above response from the Constitution already address the compelling of the person to appear, I should ask that you learn to DISCONNECT issues appropriately.

A Summons by NASS has NOTHING to do with immunity, or arrest but usually a call to testify or answer questions. When you want to discuss Immunity then you talk of the courts being involved and NASS is not the Nigerian Court.





Please go study your constitution, and learn the meaning and application of these words, so you do not come back asking me of things that are clearly explained in that document.

Again, a Summons is NOT an accusation or suggestion of guilt. It is simply a summon. The constitution explains why it can happen, when, and what happens if turned down. If the President turns it down without consequence, then anyone else can, and should EQUALLY be able to turn it down without consequence.
What's your point exactly?
Politics › Re: Jonathan Must Come To NASS, Reps Insist by porka: 7:56pm On Jun 23, 2012
Kobojunkie: Please learn about your Government and the various powers it really has. NASS does not have power to solve Security issues. That power belongs to the Executive, which is your President and all those under him.

This house has been there about a year, and it is just as good a time as any to start asking what the F**k is going on, since we doled out almost a Trillion naira to solve security so far.
Hello Madam, I can see that you are trying very hard to justify this nonsense summons. While the constitution gives the power of summons to the NASS, it also gives the president immunity against arrest (prosecution) which is the only recourse the NASS has in case the person summon refused the summons. So if you cannot effect the arrest of the president when he refuses (he will not go because no president has thus been summon and Jonathan will not lay a precedence), why issue the summons. What exactly will they do if he refused to appear before them? Call for impeachment? Then they are going to cause one of the gravest security challenges this country has ever faced, i.e. the resurgence of ND militancy. And then the security challenge will just escalate. Now tell me, how has that solve their problems?
Politics › Re: Senate Backs Creation Of Edu State by porka: 4:21pm On Jun 23, 2012
Pukkah: The response from Mark is political. Is the creation of additional states the priority now? How many of the present 36 are viable?
David Mark is a politician. "You don't kill a dog because it's barking."
Politics › Re: Fashola Rejects Creation Of Additional States by porka: 4:00pm On Jun 23, 2012
Sorrrrrrry Mr Fashola, that's life. Just bear with the situation okay.

Ikorodu and Epe are both going to the proposed Ijebu State, while the Lagoon State is a reality.

If you had done something in these two locations, there won't have been much to attract them to their kinsmen in Ogun State.

There would still be Lagos sha... Eko o ni baje o
Education › Re: ASUU Introduces ‘UNILAG Forever’ Badge To Discredit Renaming by porka: 12:37pm On Jun 21, 2012
[quote author=tj-dj]all the people seeing the UNILAG name change as good are the ones the school denied admission because ur dead brains werent good enuf...sorry we couldnt take u then,but that doesnt mean you should call a party because one dumb ass wanna take cheap popularity or pull a diversionary tactics, dont worry their is still Msc or other programmes u could do with unilag, like if u av B.sc from other universities we will give u admission into ISL( OAU,UI & Nsuka EXCEPTED),In case your dumb ass doesnt know that a secondary school....lol[/quote]So much for a living brain.
Science/Technology › Re: Harvard Students Invent Electricity Generating Football by porka:
purefella: All these oyinbos are they created in a very special way that every good things must come from them na wa oo , I sorry for africa oo , na fufu and eba we sabi invent!
They are simply using their brains. Mind you, they are almost insulated from negative news everyday.

It will take a miracle for Africans to get to using their brains in productive ways with all these negative, sensational and emotional stories fed to them by the media on daily basis.
Politics › Re: Jonathan's Destiny Is To Bankrupt Nigeria - Bakare by porka: 5:48pm On Jun 20, 2012
dedeike: @ Philip 0906, After I had taken some time yesterday to chronicle the landmark reforms in progress under Gej, you still swore an affidavit of hatred and rather chose to migrate to other threads advertising your ignorance further. You have a right to hate Gej and all that he represents, but what i will not do is to allow you distort facts and confuse issues all in a desperate but failed bid to demonize this govt. it is on record that this govt, more than any other, has enforced the provisions of the the power reforms Act 2005', they have worked on Alaoji, Afam, olorunshogo, omotosho, papal anti etc. The Mambilla and Zungeru power plants have been completed and awaiting commissioning. I challenged you yesterday to say that you have been to Aba and you didn't see any Alaoji or you went to Rivers and saw no Afam . At the completion of Utorogu plant, 4000 megawatts was added to the national grid. But you sit in your house and keep banding figures emanating from the figment of ur imagination. It has never been in doubt that this govt attained 4000 megawatts as far back as December. But what is in doubt is that govt is yet to resolve the problems associated with gas distribution to the thermal stations. To this end, the Fg has been able to review tariffs in order to be cost reflective and this has attracted the globally reputable companies like Siemens and General electric co to sign bulk trader purchase agreements for the distribution of power. It is expected that this will encourage the IOC's to invest more gas for purchase by the distribution companies. The privatization of PHCN has commenced and it's expected to peak when the bids are rolled out by july. For transmission, 22, 000 kva capacity lines covering 809 km have been completed. 41 EPC contracts have been concluded with respect to 101 projects expected to provide transmission infrastructure . For you, I know this will be sounding like long story because you believe the power crisis is as simple as ABC hence all the president needs do is to press a button from Aso rock and the whole nation will be lited. But those who appreciate the rot in the sector will acknowledge these efforts and pray that God will help Gej succeed eventually
The bold refers. Could you upload pictures of these completed plants please?

Thank you.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 (of 109 pages)