₦airaland Forum

sexkillz:
[color=#000055][size=14pt]SMH! Rantings of a M[b]A[/b]D Niger Delta Man!. . .

Next time you see matured minds, trying to have a discussion, or an exchange of ideas and you have nothing constructive or meaningful to contribute to the issue at hand, i suggest you keep your dirty trap of a mouth, SHUT! Hard as it may seem, but try so hard, to sit on your itchy fingers or betterstill, cut 'em off, to avoid you typing balderdash and hitting on the reply button! This is not your village beer Palour!. . .  [/size][/color]

Because A---->B does not mean that B----->A. It is simple logic, my friend.

claremont:
A relationship that will break-up will do so irrespective of the number of medical exams done prior to the relationship/marriage. There is no evidence that having medical exams prior to relationship/marriage will make it work better than couples who did not have such a medical exam. We should learn to reason objectively and ask for hardcore evidence, rather than just jumping into the mass bandwagon of senseless argument.

Where in the hell is the evidence that couples who do a medical exam prior to their relationship/marriage, fare better than couples who do no such thing?! The absence of evidence is the evidence of absence!

I can tell that you failed reading comprehension in school. I never said that couples who undergo a medical exam before marriage fare better than couples who don't. My post is directed at whether it is good practice for couples to do so for, perhaps, obvious reasons: know your sickle cell status so you can weigh the risks of having a baby born with sickle cell; the risk of HIV; and so on.

rokiatu:
For myself first and foremost.

no problem with doing it for yourself, first.  After yourself, so na girls come be next, and guys come be last. Na wa oooo.

My point is that it does not make you less of a woman if you publicly admit that, after you, you look good for guys/your man/husband. Quit worrying about pleasing all these females who will not give a damn about you once they find a man.  Look good for you first and, next, your man or your husband.  I was just honing on your point that guys are on the bottom of your list of the persons you look good for.

It just sounds lesbianish to me. that's all.

rokiatu:
Get it right, we do it for ourselves, and then other females. Women luv to compete with each other. Then lastly, guys. lol

If you have noticed, girls do not usually take compliments that guys give them to heart. But when their fellow female compliment them, they feel really special.

whatever. so you show your nyansh and smell good and wax your eye brows primarily for other girls. you be lesbo?

@OP: I bet my life that you failed English in the WAEC exam, if at all you sat for the WAEC exam. Your two points are conflicting, unintelligible, and seemingly irreconcilable. On the one hand, you say that girls should not rush to give their numbers to strangers because of these strangers' flash of material things. On the other hand, you say that girls should not give their numbers to guys  in whom they are not interested. What if the girl is interested in the stranger who flashes cash? According to your rationale the girl should not give her number to that stranger even if she is interested in him. Go back to your village, sister.

I commend you ladies for undergoing all these pains all in the name of beauty. We guys must be the shiznit for you ladies to go through all those pains for us. Thank you. I, on behalf of men, appreciate it.

toba:
here comes the guy that wanted to snatch my babe before before from me

your entire life revolves around your babe. do you have any personal attributes in life that gives you self esteem besides your babe? how did he try to snatch your babe from you "before before?" can you even post your own pic? you must be one of those low self esteem guys whose only pride in life is their babe. smh.

A man can rape his wife if he forcibly penetrates her. My advice, however, is that every married man whose wife denies him sex should have a mistress. That way, once his wife says no to sex, rather than risk a charge of rape, that man should go and have sex with his mistress. The woman will not claim rape, and the man will be happy. Shikenah!

BABE!:
Fantastic observation. Clap for yourself.

SMH

Floxyluv:
I appreciate flowers but i prefer other reasonable things that are necessary to my very existence. Give your girl what she appreciates. welcum back 2 9ja.

BABE!:
Flowers? I'll "appreciate" them, but i'll rather have you give me an Eleganza biro. lol (can't believe I just typed that).

Ariyke:
I like flower but why nt give me something i will appreciate even after u're gone than appreciate in your presence n then toss on d floor after u're gone

same thing in common

the truth dey bitter

Olodostein:
Your exclamation shows that you need to read some books on history, political philosphy and other related subjects. Do not be taught by an imposing media. God gave you the mind to think for yourself.

Democracy is a political system. A concept theorized and formalized by the greeks starting from Socrates.

Do not confuse Natural law/ Basic human rights with Democracy. That is a long debate altogether.  Yes, the freedom to choose who you want to lead you is Alien to some cultures. They believe in their religious books as the right law and constitution given to them by God and no man ought to impose his democratic principles on them. Go and ask the Saudi's and others.  Have you heard of the Sharia law? You need to study Islamic philosophy. Also do some reading on Orthodox Jewish philosophy.


@Princek12

If you did not think Democracy is a concept. Why did you propose anarchy, autocracy, can i add plutocracy, kleptocracy, communism, feudalism,etc as an alternate concept?

You just contradicted yourself. Therefore, your argument is invalid and your inference is incorrect.

I did not propose anarchy or autocracy. I asked you a question that what form of government do you propose as an alternative to democracy.

Since you posit that democracy is not suitable to African countries, what do you suggest. Simple question. I want a simple answer. I have heard of Sharia law, and the people of Libya have every right to decide the form of government they want to abide. The people of Libya took up arms and fought Gadhafi, and celebrated on the streets upon his demise. So who are you to judge the Libyans for picking up arms and ousting a leader that has tortured them for 42 years and counting? You have no point.

You say that I should not confuse natural law or basic human rights with democracy. Gadhafi denied Libyans the basic human right to protest and express their ideas on the streets, and political opponents were killed. He was shooting Libyans who protested against his regime and was on his way to an all out assault killing his citizens before the US and NATO stepped in.

You are not in touch with reality.

michelin89:
I go win prize?

yes oooo. where u dey sef?

michelin89:
I love my shape. . .correct figure 8! Men generally find me attractive because I have the slimness and the thickness they want at the right places!

Make we see

Olodostein:
Why don't you answer the "simple questions" I asked.  Must I write a book for you to understand my stand ? 'Democracy' is a concept. A functionalist view of it may be quite different from a liberal, pragmatist, feminist or Islamist views of it.  It is a process of learning to disagree peacefully. It should not be imposed forcefully from outside especially when it is incompatible with certain cultures and religious teachings.

Are you fond of answering questions with questions? Don't be simplistic. You sound much better than that.

Your name says it all: you are an olodo.

Democracy is a concept my arse. So what system of government do you propose as an alternate to democracy: anarchy, autocracy

Kobokunje

you better don't waste your time trying to teach people who lack the mental capacity to understand the information you give them. Nayah and all of them have said that they support dictators as long as that dictator gives the citizens of their respective countries money and rice, and maybe build some infrastructure with money that belongs to the countries. Mind you, Nayah and co do not highlight the fact that money used by these dictators belong to the country, not the dictators, and the dictators have enriched themselves beyond measure, while a majority of the citizens still live in abject poverty.

Blazing88:
theres nothing wrong with a house husband.
If his wives like him like dat?
Its cool.

abi ooo. why are some women here acting like house husbands don't exist, or acting like they don't have house husbands at home.

Mr, Cork:
mercy johnson? That ugly babe? She's too dark skin

u sound like my kind of chick

Mr, Cork:
Victolia. sweeery plis can u send me yo picture so i can inspect them? plis hurry!

inspector general

wetin I wan carry slim girl do? Do you think I like to grab bone?

I like thick, not fat, girls. I may have to open a thread to explain the difference between thick and fat gals.

I will do a slim girl sha if she has hips and bakassi, but that kind of girl almost does not exist in Naija.

Kobojunkie:
Nayah (f)
Firstly, I am not your sister . . . no sister of mine thinks up this kind of hogwash!

Secondly, what has perfection to do with this? The man whom you choose to romanticize is so hated by his own people who live their lives daily, knowing what horrors they have possibly had to endure at his hands. the people in the region are well aware of what really happens in Libya, than you are.

Yet here you are weaving fantastical stories of this man, proclaiming you have a better grasp on the reality of life in Libya than those who spent most all their lives living under this dictator. Pray tell, what do you gain all this fluff you offer even means since you obviously never spent even a year living in Libya yourself?

Nayah said that Qadaffi is fine with her because he gives married couples money, despite the fact that Qadaffi dropped bombs on Libyans who were exercising their fundamental right to protest against their govt.

The poster has some valid points. The truth is that there are men who are house husbands. It is a fact. I have seen some.

Nayah:
First Prince you should re read my point about Biya because I think you're selecting word , I said "I'm fiercely againt Biya not because of the period of his rules, but about hsi results, below what Cameroonian people expected from him, BUT Cameroon has to be change by CAMEROONIANS not French, English or whatever!

Secondly you should read MEDDLER who summarized what I tried to tell from hours now

PERIOD!

I am not selecting your word. I am saying exactly what you said, so I will quote your own sentence. You said you are fiercely against Biya, a person who has ruled Cameroon for 29 years and counting, not because he is a dictator who has an authoritarian regime, but because he has bad results. That is what you said. This means that you would have supported Biya, who is a dictator by any standard, had he produced good results. I read Meddler's comments, too, and both of you are saying the same thing.

Let me translate your words for you because it seems you don't understand the meaning of what you are saying.

I will support a dictator and his authoritarian regime as long as the dictator produces results. I support Qadaffi, who is a dictator and who killed people at will and ruled for 42 years while killing dissidents, because he did a lot of good for his people.  Same poo.

Nayah:
Prince, don't interpretate  things to support your argument: I said and I repeat what is a DICTATOR for you?? Sarkosy do you think is a "democrate" I'm sure you'll talking about the fact that regular elections made make them a democracy, so let me tell you my dear that Sarkosy fired everyone who disagree with him, ask Rama Yade, Jean Louis Borloo ( ex Minister of work then created is own party) and others journalist

Let me tell you what's slow our mind in Africa: UNITY AND WEAK GOVERNEMENTS! and what I'm striking is that some brothers think that we need to folow "western democracy model", while our reality are completely different, to make them think they're moving on! We don't copy a system like that! we have to analyse if the society is ready for this model and in adquation with socio economical realities
Colonisation broke all our political system, Africans didn't ask anything before they came and impose what they think good, and these President who live abroad and forget about African realities and are Westerner's vassals, what's the worst, seriously?

My problem is AFRICAN UNION! and not all the so called foreign considerations, if we want to change AFRICA ONLY HAS TO CHANGE BY ITSELF

A dictator is someone who kills or silences or anyone who opposes him. A dictator is someone who rules without allowing the people to vote him in a free and fair election. A dictator is someone who rules the country without a term limit, or cheats and fixes the election to allow himself to rule without a term limit. Paul Biya and Qadaffi are both dictators. Paula Biya, in particular, has been ruling without allowing Cameroonians to vote in a free and fair election and fixes just about every election in Cameroon. He has been fixing elections and recently removed the term limit for the presidency, paving way for him to rule till he dies. He silences or kills anyone who opposes him. His consent is required before a judge can review the constitutionality of a law.

To the contrary, firing members of your cabinet who disagree with you, just as Sarkozy as done, does not make you a dictator. As a president, you are allowed to exercise your executive power to hire or fire members of your cabinet. At least Sarkozy did not kill people who protest against him, and has only been elected to office in 2007 and has yet to serve one term. How does that make him a dictator?

Nayah, you have said you have no problem with Biya ruling your country since 1982, and that you support the Qadaffi who ruled his country for 42 years and killed people who protested. Qadaffi was dropping bombs on his people, and you support him because he gives married people some money and he has good economic policies. That leads me to conclude that you support dictators as long as they, in your mind, they have good economic policies and give their citizens money.

Nayah:
Prince, that's why I said you don't know me a bit, else you'll know I'm fiercly against Biya not because he has stayed too long, but because the results of his policy is not suitable to what my people  was expecting from him! do you know what we call "die cites" in the 90's Cameroonians have already protested against him
But I've always said that if Cameroonian want to change, ONLY CAMEROONIAN can do it, and if foreign people get involved in which I call, soil violation I'll be against them: History is repeasting itself all the time in Africa and we're in 2011 as if we can't understad what's going on

As for my parents, they got back to Cameroon and are working out there, so as I'm planing to do in case you think that all Africans abroad don't go  even if I think this personal data are not relevant for this topic

So Nayah I was right from the beginning: you support dictators who will rule you for hundred years and take away your rights to protest; take away your right to freedom of speech; kill you in cold blood or drop a bomb on you if you protest against the dictator; take away your right to move freely from one place to another. All they need to do is give you money (maybe $100,000 when you marry), a bag of rice and beans to eat, and have "sound" economic policies. No wonder Cameroon cannot progress if people like you have that kind of mentality, saying being a dictator is OK.

No wonder Africa is slow. Dictatorship and totalitarian regime should be forbidden under all circumstances. No one single has a right to rule his people for 42 years or past a certain time. New people need to assume power so that new ideas can come.

You support dictatorship on the one hand but complain about Biya's policies on the other hand. If you don't support Biya's policies why can you not them vote him out? Answer: because people like you support dictatorship if the dictator has some so called sound economic policies.
It is the same thing that happened in Malawi. People like you supported Mutharika when it was clear he was becoming a dictator become he had good economic policies. Very useless. Now Mutharika is another Qadaffi in the making, killing anyone who dared to challenge him. But someone like you will support Mutharika if he provides for his people and gives them a bag of rice and shrimp, maybe some goat head.

Nayah:
Prince12 how can I move from a country in which I was born? Run to France? Prince, I think we better focus on the topic, because with your all due respect you don't know what I plan to do, and where I've already worked
You should have been asked and I would have pleased to reply, but don't be so sure of what you ignore brother

Again what KHADDAFI have done, Bush, Compaoré, Bongo father, and many others haven't done?

I guess the better question is why did your parents run to France for a better life, but not to Libya? And even if you were born there, you can still move to Libya if you disagree with Sarkozy's policies and cherish Qadaffi so much.

Bush has not restricted the rights of American citizens to express themselves and he is not a dictator. He was voted to two terms in office and has left.

Again just like Campaore and Bongo Father, both of who are dictators who ruled with an iron fist, Qadaffi is also a dictator. They should all rot in hell.

Please answer the following question: Do you support the fact that Paul Biya has ruled Cameroon since 1982? Yes or No?

Nayah:
Hello brother, hope you're fine, you know I prefer 42 years in which the average ( I don't say all because there's always something to improve) live in good living standard that 5 years ruled by Sarkosy which only gives money to rich and amplfies the gap between rich and poor

For me the most sad of all this is that this is easy to divide Africans, by making them think they'll have a better life without what they call "dictators", LYBIA want change, fine but ONLY BY LYBIANS, that's my point
Tunisia and Egypt are still without leaders, and people are immigrating everywhere because of mess, what a wonderful freedom!

Why didn't you move to Libya? Why did you run to France?

Nayah:
Hello Prince, sorry but we can't be agree all the time, that's what it makes a debate: My point is simple, there's no perfect head of state in this Earth, now I know KHADDAFI made mistakes about his way to rule at the end of his life but please, I'm sorry again but Khaddafi is not the worst African, or President in this Earth, Georges W Bush and his guerrilla against so called "heavy weapon" which lead to a big mess now in irak deserves to be on top of the worst President

Tell me my dear which country lives better that Lybia? which country in Africa gave about 165 000 US dollard to young married people to buy a house and live their life, which African country pay important scolarships for their students abroad? and why Lybians ( and don't talk about dictatorship) are the people who less go abroad ( until now because you'll see they will go and these same "heros" will targeted them as immigrants later) than their African brothers? You know I'm not here to have right, but to understand some illogical aspect of the evil painted portrait of[b] the ONLY PRESIDENT who talked about AFRICAN UNION, the ONLY ONE WHO CREATE AFRICAN BANKS! [/b]What are the others African gvt has done for our Continent, while everyone is united except us? And I've noticed that each time that someone want Africa move forward, westerners are against, is tat a coincidence? Explain please, I might have wrong, but seriously some acts put by Westerners are quite strange

Why did you move to France? Why don't you move to Libya, then? So because someone gives you money for scholarships gives him the right to rule you for 42 years while paving the way for one of his sons to takeover and rule for maybe another 42 years. What you say sounds like one of those ladies who supports and votes a dictator because she was giving a bag of rice.

Libyans did not have the following:

freedom of speech;
they could not challenge any ideas he had;
they were killed and slaughtered like meat by Qadaffi.

The money you said Qadaffi gave them belongs to Libyans, not Qadaffi, so stop making it sound as if they were giving a donation. And don't you think you would rather have a country where you can make your own money and create your destiny rather than waiting for some coward to give you money?

Fancier:
@ 9jafetish


EASY GUY YOU GOT MUM IF NOT SISTERS, 

I do have moms and sisters, but they do not share the same mentality; and, for argument sake, even if they did, then that mentality would be likewise insensible and illogical. A spade is a spade, and there is nothing wrong correcting members of your own family if they act imprudently.

Nayah:
Emofine my dear sister, we really need to wake up, they're killing African countries, together with our shameless governements, we have to stop it!

Nayah, I am extremely surprised and disappointed that you have posted such gibberish. Your points are hypocritical and contradictory, and you cannot have your cake and eat it too. You criticize France and the other western countries, but you are living comfortably in France and expressing your views freely on Nairaland without inhibition.

On the one hand, your writings lead me to suggest that you will support an African dictator who rules his country with an iron hand, kills dissidents and political opponents at will, restricts free speech and freedom of expression as long as that the dictator provides for his country with money that belongs to the country. On the other hand, you advocate African unity without realizing that the same dictatorial regime that you support breeds an atmosphere where unpredictability exists in government, where new ideas are not embraced, where people cannot unite and express their ideas, and which is the very reason there is no unity in Africa. How can you unite when you are hungry and being ruled by a coward who things that your country is his personal property?

9jafetish:
the only reason why we are rude is because guys call us cheap if we give our number to them right away.

Na wa for Nigerian girls' mentality. So you will be rude to a guy you admire and cherish and won't give him your number "right away" because you think he will call you cheap? What if he is the man of your dreams and you may never run into him anymore? You will later be single and looking at 35, or you will end up with an agbero guy who is an arrangee boyfriend with whom your girlfriend hooked you up.

Your mentality, along with other Naija girls' mentality, is insensible, illogical, and an anachronism of the past.

Imanuelle:
i am getting tired of everything,

seriously,  i am giving up on nigeria,

i wonder if all our posts and pleas on nairaland change anything,

i am rily rily tired,

I feel you. Sad part is that since the Nigeria Police is centralized, as in one headquarters in Abuja controls the police department in the entire nation, it will be difficult for the headquarters to conduct investigations for all the corruption and unwarranted killing that are happening in all the thirty six states.

The states are powerless as to how to curb this corruption. Only God will help us.