₦airaland Forum

Dreamscometrue:
Ha!!!
30 ke? Celebrities and lies sha

fans of iceprince...oya like!^^^

TomHagen:
Your assumption is that Jesus is the only 'healer'. Why have you ruled out the fact that other supernatural entities (not Jesus) could have been responsible for their healings. All the healed you've mentioned have one supernatural story or the other to tell don't they? They all believe they were healed by something greater than them? Why then do you think they are wrong? Or is your grouse only against Jesus? Cc. Hopefullandlord.

hopefulLandlord:
you actually are a bit confused and sound frustrated which is understandable since this thread was just killed

first off, my observing the thread with a smirk on my face was not brought about by my being dumbfounded, I just decided to stop repeating myself over and over and over again

I've ALWAYS maintained that miracles are not exclusive to Christianity no matter how huge the miracle is

consider the below posts





take note of the bolded, that's what Lennycool did

I'm pretty sure I've said this many more times but those are the ones I can lay my hands on right now (its complicated searching for posts on Nairaland, anyone who finds it easy can walk me through it)

I decided not to repeat it here again; its a good thing someone else did not me otherwise it would've been the usual "you have anything new to say?"

and I'm pretty sure your god had a hand in those miracles he listed; that's why I said the below in the thread about the atheist that survived 2 nuclear bombings but not only survived but also lived for 65 more years, longer than your lord and personal saviour that was killed by 3 nails lived



don't mistake my silence for being dumbfounded bro, not cool, not cool


enough of this

Winner01, when are you posting a limb growing miracle?

Kalatium:
But I have not seen any direct evidence of one species evolving into another.

TheSixthSense:
About Bibles, the Orthodox bible contains books that are not even in the Roman catholic bible and it's old testament is translated from the Septuagint (LXX). Most of the Bibles in circulation and on apps and the internet have old testaments translated from the Masoretic texts (MT).

The Catholics and Orthodox document every doctrine and decision on dogma and even sermons(catechisms) even from the early centuries and their teachings are based on interpretations of early Saints and apostles, the people that knew the first apostles that Christ chose. Sorry for the long post I just had to share.

TheSixthSense:
.

winner01:
I can write 200 topics on sports and paste them in the religion section.

The point is that im religious and im on a religion section. Why not find an atheist section, blog or forum where you can spread your hate. If you think you can dwell on a religion section to mock and ridicule religious people and not get a reply, then you're wrong.


I've put you on the same plane as otemanudunno. You do not deserve my time.

TheSixthSense:
The Roman Catholic church isn't the first church

but you are very correct Islam would have killed us all or most would be muslims. if not for the roman catholics

Scholar8200:
This isnt true.

winner01:
You go te. We will continue to believe in God.

And concerning hell, the only thing you can do about it is wail on Nairaland. It wont change reality.

Wilgrea7:
i didn't modify any word... if u claim Yahweh is trying to modify the bible then why are there still many of his followers who believe in this doctrine? the false doctrine was introduced by the roman Catholic church. their biggest mistake was letting us have our own bible

UyiIredia:
It doesn't make sense. It is much more parsimonious to believe in one God than many.

UyiIredia:
I'm a deist so I'm not talking about Yahweh. Just a Creator God as generally defined. What do you mean there is no proof for the immaterial ? Your consciousness is immaterial. And the universe exists in an immaterial space. I can't say how an immaterial being made life, but that doesn't make the inference to God less valid. Sometimes you can know the origin of a thing without knowing the details.

jonbellion:
I dare you to look for a school that will accept you again

UyiIredia:
Chei ! Please and please. Snowflakes aren't codes ehn. We know you are desperate not to believe in God but you don't have to resort to foolishness biko. Conversion is not decoding. Check snowflakes on Wikipedia, nowhere does it say it is a code.

CoolUsername:
Maybe...just maybe.

CoolUsername:
That's special pleading that makes no logical sense. It is nothing but a cop-out that throws all logic out the window. Whether material or not, you said that complexity cannot exist without a designer.

If complexity cannot be attributed to God then complexity cannot come from it. It makes no sense.

Hence, we can say that complexity needs no designer.

CoolUsername:
But a code doesn't require foresight. RNA is a code but it can self-assemble under the right conditions.

UyiIredia:
Snowflakes and crystals don't have codes and it would be completely asinine to say they do. So they are not as complex as DNA. Furthermore, God is immaterial so you cannot attribute material complexity to him.

Geofavor:
You wish. Do let me know when that little voice pops up in your head tomorrow, telling you, "hurry hurry hurry. Check your kofa".

LaClicKLaBenDin:
So, we should start another argument based on the choice of description? Circle instead of Sphere, right? So, can you please provide us with graphic drawings of both shapes?
A single-line pencil drawing