₦airaland Forum

Tohzara:
Treating people gently and with care because they're women is sexist and incompatible with feminism.

A lady therefore CANNOT claim to be a feminist, and demand that she be treated in such manner BECAUSE SHE'S A WOMAN. That's tantamount to having one's cake and eating it.

Yep! That is my point.

On the other hand, a woman who's ideals are to be treated with equity can demand chivalry.

That is, a woman who's fight is for a female to have the freedom, liberties and rights to make choices about her individual life and the direction of her future irrespective of the expected gender social norms, but yet is conscious of (and accepts) gender differences and her evolutionary and biological limitations; these kind of female's ideals is compatible with chivalry.

That kind of woman I am happy to be chivalrous towards.

The selfish, advantage-seeking and misandrist buffoons, I am happy to strictly treat exactly like a man in all situations. Those are the real transexuals to me. I have no romantic interest in them.

ICEMAN:
Male Chivalry and feminism are mutually exclusive. Here in the States feminism has made it that men don't give a bleep about women. If you are my equal then you should be able to open your own damn doors yourself. You should be able to go to Sambisa and be on the front lines and not in the camp taking selfies with AK 47's. Feminism destroys societies. It has consumed and destroyed the family unit in the United States and if Nigerians do not take time it will consume Nigeria next.

For all the women it is a fact that men marry less in countries where there is a strong presence of feminist ideology. There are also much more divorces in such situations. If you are crying there are no good husbands in Naija just wait till the feminist movement takes off and you will wish for these days to return. In the US feminists are denouncing feminism and trying to bond back with men because they have seen that they cannot function without men. The result is that there is difficulty for men to accept them because most men already have a preconceived notion about feminists and believe that a leopard can never change its spots.

A word of advise to the bunch of ignorant and western value copying women out there. If you want to destroy your family,become a feminist. If you want to be successful maintain your culture.

Thank you, homie.

You tell them, but instead of listening, they tell you that you are a "woman hater".

https://www.nairaland.com/4335452/5-ways-feminism-destroying-nigerian#64960051

The young UK girls have clocked-on. They are rejecting and attacking feminism in droves now.

ReinaFarine:
If the dictionary can no longer be trusted to give meaning to words, then what book is universally accepted to do that? Everyone has a definition to fit the word depending on the situation and if we can't trust the dictionary yo give us one standard then where will we get standard from.
If I am not to use the dictionary to define feminism, then please tell me, in your own words, what is feminism? And by what authority do you define the word for it to be acceptable as more accurate than the Oxford Dictionary?

I think you missed the point, darling.

The point is that there are different composition of dictionaries and all are based on the subjectivity of the composer and their acceptance of word usage.

Sometimes these concur 100%, sometimes it is reasonable in concurment and other times there are some differences based on the subjectivity of the composers. So I throw the question back at you, which dictionary do you then trust?

Lets take for example, the meaning of "phobia":

Dictionary.com describes it as: "a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it".

Merriam Webster describes it as: "an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.

Fundamentally these are similar but different. So dictionary definitons are subject to the understanding, whims and even biases of the dictionary composers.

ReinaFarine:
I don't know where you got that definition but I'm gonna attach the dictionary definition of homophobia.

Now go back to the definition of phobia above.

Does the fact I object to legalisation of a man marrying a man and having children via a surrogate mean I have an irrational/illogical "fear" of homosexuality? What is the "fear" in objection before we even argue on the label of "irrational/illogical"?

Your dictionary definition (and probably all dictionary definitions) removed the irrational/illogical tag but yet label it a "phobia".

Why? Just because some people in the West pesistently use it as an attack on those that don't rally behind their liberal nonsense.

Can you see the kind of nonsense and misaligned definitions you get in dictionaries now? And why you should not say every word in one is definitive?

As a matter of fact, the fact that I would not be interested in marriage with a transwoman because to me they are not and can never be a woman makes me "transphobic" according to the dictionary definitions. That is, I am just scared and being irrational and illogical.

ReinaFarine:
Who is an Al Qaeda Member?

Anyone that declares an affiliation to the group and believes sufficient porportion of their respective sub-ideologies are aligned.

ReinaFarine:
No dictionary confuses it for peace loving Muslims in service to their God. Dictionary honey. The fact that most terrorist hide under the umbrella of Islam Jihad doesn't make them the true Muslim. Most times, there is discrimination almost to the point of abuse against the true Muslim because of this boisterous few tarnishing the image of Islam (not alqaeda) doesn't change the dictionary definition of Islam. Everyone know who an alqaeda member is there is no twist in the definition.

I never said it did.

I suggest you go and re-read my post.

ReinaFarine:
I also attached the dictionary definition of A Nazi.

Check your Dictionary honey.

For what reasons?

ReinaFarine:
Don't confuse misandry for feminism. No matter how much some Misandrist (terrorist/Nazi/slave traders/colonialist) try to hide under the umbrella of Feminism (Islam/German/Libyan/Caucasian) to express and portray their vile wicked acts, as long as the dictionary definitions of this words have not changed, I am still a feminist. Until the word feminism no longer supports the social, political and economical equality of the sexes, I am a feminist. Until the word because synonymous to Male slavery and abuse, I am a feminist. You don't get my point fine. Give me a word from your beautiful non dictionary book to call a person Like me and I promise to have it tattooed on my forehead in bright pink.

Misandry, advantage-seeking, victim-claiming, selfishness and illogical data are now part of the prominent ideals being portrayed by the loudest voices in feminism at the moment.

That is what we see as feminism today and hence how we define it.

They are the biggest umblerra (as Mama Piss would say).

ReinaFarine:

Courteous behavior, especially that of men towards women
. This is the fifth definition true?

Chivalry means Courteous behaviour. It never makes the female excluded from showing this form of courtesy. It says especially that of men towards women
Not
Courteous behaviour of men towards women. There is a difference honey. And if you can't see it, I'm too tired to point it out.

Especially is different from specifically.

Again, you failed to be aware of the differences in dictionaries' definitions, dictated by subjectivity.

Here is the Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of Chivalry: "A gallant and distinguished gentleman".

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chivalry

In it, it has nothing to do with ladies, just gentlemen.

As a matter of fact, I challenge you to present cases of where a woman has done anything to men in history that has been declared as "chivalry".

ReinaFarine:
Another thing you seem to be confusing is the OP's question. Should a feminist expect male chivalry? From my Lover, I expect courtesy and respect. From random strangers, feminism teaches that bothe gender should learn to respect and show courtesy to strangers. Any questions?

Again, when women show courtesy to men, it is not chivalry. Chivalry is a one-gender-way diktat.

Secondly, chivalry is not defined by any dictionary as a behaviour strictly between lovers. It is defined as a behaviour demonstrated by any man towards any woman.

Stillfire:
I find it absolutely absurd Nigerians talking about 'chivalry'. Does Chivalry exist in the Nigerian context? Are Nigerian men 'chivalrous' to Nigerian women? The origins of this word which has medieval knightly symbolism has absolutely nothing to do with Africans. Modern western applications of the word like 'holding the car door for women', "offering" your jackets when it's "cold", has absolutely nothing to do with us.

Nigerian men were/are NEVER chivalrous. Nigerian women have never benefited from this 'chivalry' culture. Where we come from women SERVE men and not the other way round. This topic is dead on arrival and not applicable in our context. It should be 'debated' on a Western board. They are the ones that know what they mean by their 'chivalry'.

However, The FEMINIST language is to give courtesy to everybody, i.e to show politeness in one's attitude and behavior toward others. Holding the doors for people (no gender specificity) is polite. That is the FEMINIST view. Very simple and clear.

And Sagamite, the word FEMINIST is a very good tool to weed off badly behaved Nigerian males from ones life. Very, very effective and less stressful. As long as evil customs engineered by the patriarchy exists and parades itself as culture, religion and tradition, feminism MUST co-exist with it. Yes, it's been a long while, just remembered this site exists, thought Seun would have killed this nuisance site eons ago. I am back to torment your soul.

It would definitely weed me off. This is how I respond to girls like you that tell me they are feminist while I am trying to impregnate them.

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2016-10/4/3/asset/buzzfeed-prod-web06/sub-buzz-14418-1475567885-1.jpg

Tohzara:
MissWrite and ReinaFarine, I agree with you guys 100%. Like you said, It shouldn't be gender-specific (as that would make it sexist), but I WAS gender-specific in my question because that's exactly what I wanted to talk about. I've edited the topic to make that clear. And I appreciate your responses.

I consider it hypocritical for a feminist to place emphasis on male chivalry and consider it a one-sided OBLIGATION. And I'm glad none of you tried making a case for it. There are "feminists" who consider this normal, and claim those of us who have problems with it are "petty". I think it's a normal thing to do, but it should be RECIPROCATED.

Sagamite, I think you should focus on the ACTUAL definition of feminism, and not the ideologies of shitty clowns and rats that have hijacked the tag. It remains valid for those who stay true to the actual objective of the movement and recognize its boundaries----and there's still a significant number of them, so you can't lump them into a basket with these other "feminists", or ask them to abandon their movement for these cretins.

Having said that, I think the answer you gave in your last statement isn't really precise. Do you mean MALE CHIVALRY (note the emphasis) and "sane" feminism are compatible, or are you talking about chivalry in itself, without gender obligations attached?

They both didn't claim it "shouldn't" be gender-specific.

They tried to claim it is not.

Chivalry is!

Chivalry in non-war situation is about men recognising the weakness of women and being obliged to treat them gently and with care.

It is not about women reversing this towards men, and not about men applying the same philosophy to other men ......................(except to effeminate ones in a Gay village).

MissWrite:
Male chivalry? No. I think it would be unfair to insist on male chivalry alone; there's always an imbalance/inequality when you say "male this" or "female that". And this kind of inequality doesn't agree with the general feminist philosophy. Chivalry has a non-gender-specific definition, and it simply means showing kindness, respect and loyalty to people around you. Chivalry and feminism aren't mutually exclusive. The fact that women are (and want to be) self-determining creatures in society doesn't impede chivalrous behavior in any way. We give it and we take it.

Chivalry originated from war situations and from Knights.

The former is from a period where women did not participate in wars, the latter was a position women could not attain.

So, sorry, Chivalry is gender-specific. A woman cannot be "chivalrous". They can have or demonstrate the behaviours but the tag is not attributable to them in general.

MissWrite:
We all deserve a little consideration from others, and that is exactly how we should all be with people: considerate. When I walk through a door in a public building, I hold it open for the person coming behind me (whether it's a man or a woman or a child) so it doesn't slam in their face. When someone drops their stuff and it falls at my feet, I pick it up for them (whether it's a man or a woman). When someone I'm with is trying to lift something heavy, I give them a hand. When I see someone who is greatly inconvenienced by standing (for whatever obvious condition: pregnancy, amputation, fatigue....), I give them my seat (whether it's a man or a woman).

It's nice when people are kind and courteous. But the vagina doesn't require more consideration than the penis in society (and vise-versa; Seun, kindly address this issue of biased censorship )so don't give your seat to someone simply because she's a woman.

However, in relationships, people tend to baby each other to make each other feel special, and that's okay. It's not anti-equality; it's a way to show affection. These little things are indicative of how much the other person cares and a mark of their attentiveness (and sometimes: possessiveness) towards their significant other. I would definitely sit myself down before my date has had the chance to pull up a chair for me; but if he sits down without an eye out to be sure that I've got a seat too, I would hold it against him. Bigly . And I would give equal consideration to him. I won't just sit down before I've made sure he's sorted out as well (even if I won't be the one hauling a chair over my head).

Men would want feminists to believe now that the old-fashioned male chivalry was all about women, but ugly lowly girls would remember history differently. And we know better too. Most guys wouldn't even have contemplated giving a lift, or giving up their seat, to a four-hundred pound woman even if she desperately needed to get off her feet. But that's okay, women are also less inclined to give favors to un-hot men; we live in a superficial world.

Feminism cannot be compatible with chivalry.

Apart from war situations where the definition of chivalry is about mercy, the other definition of chivalry is premised on acknowledging the weakness of the other sex, which modern feminism would not accept.

The latter definition is not demonstrated by men towards other men except they are poofs (homosexuals).

ReinaFarine:
Sagamite is quite pained with the word feminism.... Well even though the word has been bastardised and used as a term to support man-hating and pseudo-abuse against the male gender, as long as the dictionary definition still reads a person who believes in the social, political and economic equality of the sexes, I AM A FEMINIST. I don't know but you can check the definition of who a Nazi is, who an Alqaeda sympathizer is or whatever, The definition of the term kind of describe who the person is and what they support. So until the term gets so bastardized that the definition changes in the dictionary, I am a feminist.

Dictionary definitions are not concrete, they are sometimes disputable.

They are based on prominent and extant definitions, that are not necessarily right.

For example, someone against some homosexual pressure group wishes is termed "homophobic" by these lunatic groups.

The last time I checked the meaning of phobia in a dictionary, then the definition of homophobia is not representative of phobias.

ReinaFarine:
The fact that millions use the I AM A MUSLIM FIGHTING FOR ALLAH to defend their acts of terrorism doesn't make every Muslim a terrorist. The fact that Libya is now a very big market for slave trade doesn't make every Libyan a slave trader. The fact that most Yoruba young men are known for their flirty playboy attitude doesn't make every Yoruba man unfaithful. I define true feminism and until the dictionary meaning of that word changes to a man hating (sometimes to he point of abuse), sad, depressed, lonely, old, hag of a lesbian. I AM A FEMINIST.. And you can take that to the bank. Give me another word for a person with my beliefs and I will swing that flag so high you'll see it from outer space until then, please call me a feminist.

There is nowhere I mentioned "Muslims". I used Al Qaeda member/supporter. That does not imply all Muslims.

Just like I used Nazi, not Germans.

And used colonialists, not Caucasians.

So you point is not valid.

The point I made was that calling your self a discredited tag would raise and objection to you, no matter the alternate ideals you claim to espouse.

ReinaFarine:
And for chivalry, once again I'll go with the definition of the word. I have attachrd the definition of the word that i can find in a picture to this text. I'll appreciate my partner (not a random male figure) to treat me kindly. Why? Because he loves me. Not because I am weak but taking care of me is his utmost priority and he will strive to do anything to put a smile on my face. And I will do likewise. Anything to put a smile on my face. It becomes misogyny if the reason he is taking care of me is because he considers me fragile and incompetent of doing little things like opening my car doors or zipping up my gown or pulling out a chair on a date or any other perceived form of chivalry. Similarly it will be insulting if the reason I pack his lunches, fix his cufflinks, and all are because I consider him too stupid to handle such task. Note he is not doing all these because I am a woman. He is doing it because I am his soulmate. Kisses.

You OWN dictionary definition makes your point meaningless.

See definition 5.

Chivalry is about how MEN behave towards 'women', not how your established/selected lover behave towards you.

Don't mix up 'Loving' with 'Chivalry'.

Jupxter:
If i can make an accurate forecast of events, i can predict that over 90% of the marriages of ladies that read and apply the comments on this forum will end up crashed, i.e. even if they marry it won't last.

I can't help thinking when i read up comments here to observe how selfish, intolerant, self-centered and myopic the understanding and mental posture of ladies that visit this section are. I see them being set-up for divorce, heart-break, disaster, divorce, victims of wrong partners in future, unhappiness, depression etc.


So, i'll rate it that 90% of romancelander females that belong to that " me " clique, have a 90% divorce expectancy. Same goes to any ladies in their cliques they indoctrinate with their armageddon and voodoo relationships principles... Am i wrong or just stating the fact guys ?

Some of my reasons are :

Over inflated sense of self


The oozing sense of entitlement

Lack of understanding

Myopic views about life

Distorted reasoning

Concotted indoctrination being imbibed from their fantasies to say the least belies some of the reasons i feel this generation should prepare for 9 divorce out of ten marriages

Untested doctrines imbibed from movies and fantasies

What do you think fellas?

Ubunja

Belafonte

Sagamite

Gungnir

No shadow of a doubt!

As a matter of fact, marriage is an institution of failure of which about 40-50% is evidential (i.e. ending up in divorce) and a significant other fraction is covert failure (i.e. miserable and smiling).

I have repeatedly suggested that only about 20% of marriages are successful and that success is not based on the modern, romantic nonsense notion of "what a marriage should be". If we attempted to use that notion as a metric, the proportion of successful marriages would fall below 10%.

As for many NL females, yes you are right. Many are set for divorce, heart-break, disaster, divorce, victims of wrong partners in future, unhappiness, depression etc.

Many black people (men and women) lack self-development. Marriage wouldn't work well with them and the woman would be the most miserable at the end because they lack the qualities, skills and lifestyle to manage the relationship with the man.

Jupxter:
You keep saying this hommie @ Products of a failed education system.

Bruv, that is what they are.

Most of this cretins would either claim "I am a graduate" or "I am in university doing my degree", but yet these monkeys are more stupid than stupid is defined in the dictionary.

Only a failed education system would enrol or award degrees to such dumbos.

Not at any stage did they use their brain and bother to question the veracity and source of the news despite the fact fake news is pertinent and a hot topic in today's world!

Bloody fcking daft monkeys! So gullible and controllable.

Let me tell you how someone with a brain consumed such information:

1) When I read it, I could see that the idea was stupid and the stated amount earned by the legislators was a retarded lie that is being circulated for years.

2) The person the statement was allocated to, Sanusi, is one of the smartest Nigerians alive today. This is no Wike, Okorocha, Fayose or Yerima. This is a genius in a shithole country. It is unlikely he would come up with such a retarded suggestion.

3) I looked at the source link, and it is obvious it is not a reputable publication.

4) I googled the story to see if any other publication carried it and found out it is only "copy and paste" journalist websites, not in any reputable international or local publication. There is no way the EMIR OF KANO would say such that a reputable publication would not carry it.

5) Hence, I came back here and stated it is likely fake news.

Easy!

Monkeys don't have a good brain. It would be hard for them.

khiaa:
LMAO It wasn't your pedar it was your belly, keep that big fat belly away from my body.

Happy Valentines Day.

What?

You don't want that baaaady?

Maybe it is because you are yet to see me in a suit.

"Am out here drippin' in finesse
It don't make no sense
My belly drippin' in finesse
You know it, you know it"

https://solidariteit.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/KhulubuseZuma_gallo.width-370-300x225.jpg

Happy Vals, cutie.

As far as I am concerned, it is not acceptable to be a "feminist" today, it just does not fly anymore period.

I hear that word/tag and I immediately get irritated.

That said, I am not saying all women that tag themselves as "feminists" are arseholes or even wrong with their views (depending on what those are and how they are configured). There are many sane females with the ideals of equity that misjudgedly tag themselves as a feminist.

They need to learn it really just does not fly after the damage that has been done to that tag. It is not a tag that is redeemable anymore.

It is like someone coming to say I am a Nazi because I love my country, Germany, but I don't hate Jews, I believe in free-speech and I would tolerate opposition. IT WOULD NOT FLY!

It is like someone coming to say I am a Colonialist because I want to help African countries to develop, but I don't support slavery and the exploitation of black people. IT WOULD NOT FLY!

It is like someone coming to say I am part of Al Qaeda/ISIS because I believe Allah loves every human being on earth and I want to share the beauty of Islam with the world, but I don't believe in violence and imposition of my beliefs by force. IT WOULD NOT FLY!

Like feminism, all those tags are permanently damaged and you cannot associate your good ideals with them. Find a fcking new tag!

There is no "I understand your reaction but those are not the real feminsits/Nazis/Colonialists/ISIS, you are mistaken". Find a fcking new tag!

So if we are coming from the angle of the tag "feminism", then the answer to the thread's question is "HELL NO".

If we are coming from the angle of decent personal ideals related to the original driving movement of feminism. Then that is a different discussion.

What are the decent personal ideals? I shall use a very good summarisation by GiantParrot to explain:

GiantParrot:
Hopefully Nigerian/African women would learn from the burgeoning backlash we're seeing against their western counterparts, and focus their activism on real problems (like poorer access to education for female children, domestic abuse, babaric treatment of widows, abuse of wives by in-laws, and so on,) without overstepping into delusional notions like make-believe equality (which is essentially equality of outcome achieved via forced quotas), female superiority and male subservience. And rid themselves of the unwarranted sense of entitlement and self-importance that stem from such nonsensical notions.

Those are the decent personal ideals any sane human being should have and support.

That is, the right of women to have freedom of choice as men do and for them to be able to exploit these choices and their abilities as best as they can to compete in society. In short, EQUITY!

I repeat equity, not equality, as women (on average) can never and are not evolutionarily built to be equal to men.

Yes, I fcking said it! Nature is not fcking politically correct. Take that to the bank and get some great fcking interest.

There would be those women that are better than men, but on average men would be better in the things feminism is trying to get equality on.

But whatever each individual's ability, they should have the freedom to elect how they use it without any legal control and limitations because of their gender. Nor should they have any legal leg up or advantage because of their gender. That is my stance!

This stance is compatible with chivalry. Feminism (the madness) is not!

400billionman:
I am shocked at the comments I am reading.

I was expecting to see an outcry on the thread. Alas, at least 80% of the youths concerned have never seen N3m in bulk but one senator takes home N36m every month..

You cant force people to have sense nah.

Do you have sense?

Sagamite:
I am pretty sure this is reetarded fake news.

And all the black baboons who are products of a failed education believed it.

The suggestion is reetarded with complete nonsense data and I would doubt such would come from an immensely intelligent man like Sanusi.

The problem with Nigeria is not just poor leadership, it is also the fucktardism of followership.

To all you moronic fuuktards on this thread, did I not say this was fake news.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/02/never-call-slashing-legislatures-salaries-sanusi-ii/

Daft baboons!

You dumbarses believe anything given to you from all useless sources without any attempt to verify.

Bloody monkeys! Products of a failed education system.

oyb:
not sure they would be able to erm find it

Oloshi!

khiaa:
1. Yes, come to Cali and I will cook you a soul food dinner.

2. Well you want be disappointed with my milkshake.

3. Having a big belly is a sign of greed besides you're not in Africa so lose that belly.

4. LMAO I don't want a rugrat by a dead beat dad, just purchase the Teddy bear like I requested.

I am at the airport now, babes.

https://cdn.24.co.za/files/Cms/General/d/6498/d7668f9577734335b9ae8b326a21c4ab.jpg

See you tomorrow in Cali for valentines.

By the way, I prefer being on top. So get ready for action tomorrow night.

PS: I hope you have a will already written? Because on a few occassions while climbing on some girls, they have ended up not waking up the next morning. Which just created a mess, as their families did not know how to share their assets as they had no will in place.

I don't know what the fck happened. Maybe they were just unable to handle my dicck.

Painting by the homosexual racist.

peachesandroses:
No value for human life...
"Suspects " They haven't even been found guilty, lots of innocent people are going to die..

So innocent people are going to die, and your point is?

What fcking nonsense sentence!

Instead of sentencing the useless animal to have his throat slit like a sallah goat.

lefulefu:
Op biko carry this ur thread to the political section where u guys always throw punches at each other . If its not igbo vs yoruba today then tomorrow it will Nigeria vs south Africa the day after tomorrow na the turn of hausa vs igbo. Una no dey tire?

Don't mind the fuuktard.

He woke up to attack another set of people. Nothing better to do with his day.

Typical black monkey!

All they know is "Us vs them".

"I hate X people", "My tribe is better than yours" etc.

Moronic products of a failed education system that have nothing better to do with useless lives than to spread hatred and destroy their society by themselves or through violence with others!

And then they want to run to more sane countries with sane and intelligent people who use their brains before they talk. Queuing up for visa, looking for documents here and there. Or they try to cross seas illegally from Libya.

Black monkeys!

Anuofia! May herdsmen do their job soon and finish the fuuktard OP off. Worthless human being.

laidelaitan:
Cut legislators’, ministers’ salary by half, Sanusi tells Buhari

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi II, the Emir of Kano, has advised President Muhammadu Buhari to review the salaries of members of the National Assembly and ministers, with a view to creating more jobs for Nigerian unemployed youths.

According to Guardian, he said this yesterday while urging political office holders to make sacrifices and salvage the country from its current economic downturn.

He argued that if the salary of each member of the National Assembly was divided into two, it would go a long way to provide more jobs for 70,400 jobless Nigerians at between N90, 000 and N92, 500 monthly salary.

Sanusi gave the charge through a statement addressed to President Buhari, while also lamenting that the salary of military personnel, who are defending the country was only N49, 000 with some of them lacking accommodation.

He said: “Where is the change? Change should start with the National Assembly. A senator receives N36million monthly. If this is divided into two, it comes to N18 million.

The second half of N18 million can be used to create jobs for 200 Nigerians, each earning N90, 000 monthly, When you multiply 200 people by 109 senators, this will give 21,800 Nigerians gainful employment.

In short, 200 Nigerians will be able to live a comfortable life on half a senator’s monthly salary.”

Further highlighting the disparity in the standard of living of public office holders, particularly the legislators, Sanusi argued that a member of the House of Representatives receives N25million monthly.

“Half of that amount is N12.5million, which is enough to employ 135 Nigerians with a monthly salary of N92, 500 each.

https://www.headofsocials.com/2018/02/12/cut-legislators-ministers-salary-half-sanusi-tells-buhari/

I am pretty sure this is reetarded fake news.

And all the black baboons who are products of a failed education believed it.

The suggestion is reetarded with complete nonsense data and I would doubt such would come from an immensely intelligent man like Sanusi.

The problem with Nigeria is not just poor leadership, it is also the fucktardism of followership.

mespusinglez:
my girl always complain that i don't PET her..and that its affecting her badly.i asked her how do she want me to pet her she was MUTE.
That I Don't Know How To Pet Her And It's Not Helping matters...
i called her this morning ...after greeting her and was engaged in a convo she still brought up the talk of "i don't pet her and she don't like it." i then ask her again how do she want me to pet her she replied it's OK and i angrily end the call....
abeg make wunna help me o
coz i think i'm losing her

No 5 and 10.

https://www.nairaland.com/962850/ladies-which-these-dating-evils

Possibly No 6 as well.

BiafranBushBoy:
Stop responding to daft threads. Fvck off

Fuuktard, so you woke up to attack another set of people?

Typical black monkey!

All they know is "Us vs them".

"I hate X people", "My tribe is better than yours" etc.

Moronic products of a failed education system that have nothing better to do with useless lives than to spread hatred and destroy their society!

Anuofia! May herdsmen do their job soon on you. Worthless human being.

GiantParrot:

This guy has got no chill!!!

Of course!

The attempt by some at using victimhood as a weapon of attack will only backfire on women in general on the long-run. It would make it a challenge for them to fit into the caucus or trying to fit them in.

If I was to be a mentor to a guy, it would be a completely different thing. I would go for lunch with him, chat about everything with him, and if he is my type of homie, I would even invite him out with my crew and network.

No risks, just fun! Now guess which of the 2 would bond more with me and extract more from me from the mentorship?

Reminds me of a time I worked with a guy on some few private projects. Previously he was working with a very nice woman (who I actually knew). They worked well together until she had to moved on.

One day when we were hanging out chilling and chatting at a restaurant, he said it was just fun working with me. And I was like "wetin, that the woman was cool na and could work well with him as much as I did". He said "Yeah, she was cool and all that, but it is not everything you can chat with a woman as a married man. You can't even see an attractive woman and discuss it with her. You have to control yourself like if you are not looking. Something I don't have to do with you". Yeah, me and him talk a lot of shyt about girls. Sorry, I talk most of the shyt about girls and he laughs like crazy.

This guy is much older than me. Guess who he called when he was appointed as the MD of a large company. Me or the woman?

Another one.

When I was younger and just joined a top firm, was posted on a project where my project boss had already been on the project months before me.

The company booked hotels for us and I went for breakfast in the morning with this project boss, a white guy. Soon an Indian guy from our company, but working on another separate project at the same large client as our project, joined us at the breakfast in the hotel restaurant.

While we were all chatting together, all of a sudden I heard my white project boss say to the Indian guy "Piss off, you Paki baaastard".

The Indian guy retorted "Fck off, white trash".

I was shocked, looked up and looked at both of them.

They were smiling.

Then the Indian guy told me that is how we great each other. We all started laughing.

That shows you how well bonded these guys are and very comfortable with each other. Free with each other like hell.

You think if this white guy moved on and is climbing ladders and his employers want to fill a top role and told him to recommend someone, he would not recommend this Indian guy? He would see him as some Indian or "my homie"?

GiantParrot:
I wonder what modern western women smoked that influenced them to believe men exist to serve them. Anyone who is under the delusion that the consequences of their actions should not affect them is no different from a child. More and more men in the west are getting tired of the feminist's sh1t. Even some of the leftist cucks are beginning to get red-pilled. MGTOW is growing in numbers by the day. It would be interesting to see how things will turn out in the next generation.

The highlighted is exactly what many of the feminist are implicitly and insidiously trying to set up.

Women should have equal rights with men but they should be protected like children from their own actions.

Many young girls in the UK are stepping up to reject feminism aggressively. Many on youtube as well.

GiantParrot:
Hopefully Nigerian/African women would learn from the burgeoning backlash we're seeing against their western counterparts, and focus their activism on real problems (like poorer access to education for female children, domestic abuse, babaric treatment of widows, abuse of wives by in-laws, and so on,) without overstepping into delusional notions like make-believe equality (which is essentially equality of outcome achieved via forced quotas), female superiority and male subservience. And rid themselves of the unwarranted sense of entitlement and self-importance that stem from such nonsensical notions.

Couldn't be fcking better said!

BiafranBushBoy:
You can write right?

Why can't you pick up a laptop and do all you've said.

Bullshit!! Get the fvck outta my thread!!!

When I write, I write with Godly brain.

Stop creating daft threads.

Product of a failed education system!

oyb:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en-GB&v=wse_hgca220&gl=NG

No o!

Observing and stating the known obvious is just hatred of women.

They are "victims".

Someone who does not have responsibilities and accountabilities can never be blamed for their wrong, so it is nice not to have any but be "equal".

https://www.nairaland.com/4316979/marriage-finally-over/4#64622792

GiantParrot:
This is so well said. Actions have consequences, whether intended or unintended. It's very easy to ignore the unintended consequences when the course of action is being conceived. That doesn't prevent those unintended consequences from manifesting in due time. In any case, here's something feminists can take to the bank: sensible, high achieving men will almost always act rationally to minimize their risks. Permit ne to add a few links to support your post.


https://www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/young-men-giving-up-on-marriage-women-arent-women-anymore

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3467778

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4994118/amp/Women-destroying-marriage.html


In addition, business leaders, who are mostly male, are becoming increasingly wary of mentoring women.
www.yahoo.com/amphtml/finance/news/since-metoo-number-men-uncomfortable-201248681.html

Yep!

I can see the obvious and I am blunt with it.

I am the opposite of most women. They love being lied to as long as what is being said is to their favour. That is the way they are even in relationships.

And most like to do what they want but think the negative consequences should not affect them because they should not be responsible and accountable for their own actions.

Dreamers!

Why the fck would anyone with a brain (and successful men are usually smart) take on such a huge altruistic risk with limited-to-no upside for themselves at all but the downside is catastrophic?

It is not rocket science to deduce these outcomes.

Just one unverified and unverifiable accusation can cause so much damage and even public vitriol, why would you take such a risk if you can avoid it?

People would be discussing on TV with an obvious assumption that you are guilty (called the perpetrator) before even any evidence is provided by your accuser (clearly called the "victim" without any evidence).

Mentee at work? Fcking avoid females simple. Not worth it for you.

One touch of the shoulder can be said to be "sexual harassment".

Casual opening of door for her can be said to be a sign of your "casual and passive sexism".

In most cases, you can't avoid the gender of your mentee because it is a normally a random allocation by HR once you volunteer to be a mentor.

If you are allocated a female, engage in it at a complete distance and strictly professionally. Don't let your guard down once. Treat it like diplomacy session with North Korean negotiators in Pyongyang. I don't want to know about your fcking problems at home, with boyfriend, what you did for the weekend, nor do I want to have the chat over lunch or a coffee blah blah blah.

Preferably majority of the 'menting' is done via email and every of the few direct interaction is in a office meeting room with see-through glass.

I am an advocate of managing the risk strictly to your own advantage and benefits.

And as for marrying one? That relates to one of the questions I have repeatedly asked the marriage advocates for a number of years now.

"Why the fck would you elect and want to spend the rest of your life with someone who only cares about herself and focuses on only her interests"?

The sex is not worth it and you can get that in abundance if you are single.

Neither do I need anyone's company. Worse still, if the company is not enjoyable.

khiaa:
1. Yes, come to Cali and I will cook you a soul food dinner.

2. Well you want be disappointed with my milkshake.

3. Having a big belly is a sign of greed besides you're not in Africa so lose that belly.

4. LMAO I don't want a rugrat by a dead beat dad, just purchase the Teddy bear like I requested.

Dimples129:
Agreed to disagree. My take is no means no whenever wherever however! I am blessed to enjoy those rights. My daughters will enjoy those rights! Bleep you rapists and rapist sympathisers and those on the fence.

Get your fcking 'no' right and clear, and stop arguing someone you agreed to have sex with has raaped you because you are flip-flopping!

Keep on fcking talking "your rights" but repudiating your responsibilities and accountabilities. It is all about fcking you .......not!

Dimples129:
On top of all your hate and nonsense, you are capable of rape too... if you hate women this much sag.. come out the fucking closet, mate. Go offer your plump asss for drilling. You don't like women, stop lying to yourself. To be able to continue when told to stop; only showcases your character, Weh done sir!

Obviously she objected physically! She didn’t just say stop alone! And even if she did... A decent human being would stop.

Yeah! Fcking telling a woman to take responsibility and accountability is "hatred of women".

What utter fcking nonsense!

You only understand rights, you don't know what responsibilities and accountabilities are.

A woman's inability to fcking make up her mind is not fcking rape, it just means her head is messed up.

But a decent human being does "stop and start" sex nonsense? That shows your character? Continue talking pure crap!

Gerrard59:
That is what the third and fourth (especially) wave feminist movement have done. You forgot to add the Professional Darts' Corporation decision which came before F1. And yes, it is very bad to shame women who desire to be housewife (thought it was all about equality of choice?). However, what I support is the fight against rape. Unfortunately, that has been abused recently. Thereby reducing the veracity of actual victims' claims. Some feminists criticised the #Metoo campaign as being too extreme, and they were abused and insulted by fellow feminists

No, not really. I didn't forget.

I just thought a lot of readers in Nigeria might not know what Darts is or how big it is. So stuck with F1 only.

Obviously no sane person would not stand against rape or destroying of people's careers because they refused to sleep with you. Like you, it is the abuse of the claims I can't stand, like when people make allegations to the press and they receive anonymity while the accused is trialled by media. Or when someone faces a public onslaught because they are a man for clumsy seductions like the Defence Secretary that touched a knee in a bar. A touch even the woman herself said she did not feel harassed but just did not want, and then it turned into witchhunt by femininists for him to resign.

Gerrard59:
Another lie by the feminist movement was that of Sir Tim Hunt - 2001 Nobel Prize winner in Medicine and Physiology. They did not even allow the man to have his case heard, and forced to resign. Upon research, it was discovered that the lady at the storm - Connie St Louis - lied by omitting certain parts of his speech. Intriguingly, Tim was forced to resign, and the lady kept her job. Talk about double standards!

This is when any reetard should know he is in a gender war. Feminists are only seeking power.

Gerrard59:
Abeg, a new name should be coined for equal rights for humans.

Yep. Never tolerate that tag.

Thank God most UK girls are rejecting it.

Was watching a news programme in the UK when they were celebrating the 100 years of women getting the right to vote and the TV station invited 4 women to discuss. All agreed that the feminist tag is now seen as negative and one was even suggesting a change of name to "Womanist".

Fck feminism! (Except in the third world)

Rider007:
Funny u... Lazy pigs

Cretinous fuuktard you are living in a shithole and your likes are being sold as slaves and you have the audacity to call others lazy?

Moooron!