₦airaland Forum

[quote author=ifeanyi_ja]“You may recall that there have been attempts to clarify issues pertaining to this particular procurement. You will also recall that in the process some of the issues were further muddled up.

I mention in this regard the first attempt at clarifying the issue by the Coordinating Spokesperson for the Parastatals who, without recourse to the Minister or the Principal Officers of the Ministry and its Agencies described the information as a mere rumour.

“This was followed by the statement of my S.A Media who was himself guided by his own perception of the duties and challenges of the office of the Minister and possibly, even the danger to the person and office of the Minister.

This is made evident by the fact that his statement focused on the personal security of the Minister without recourse to the procurement process and policy file to which he did not have access; hence a statement that the procurement was for the “safety and security of the Honourable Minister whom he said was facing some imminent threats to her life on account of the reforms in the sector”.

“The last official intervention in this matter came from the Director General of NCAA, the agency charged with the oversight of the aviation sector and the agency that actually undertook the procurement.

Whereas the DG was right in saying that the vehicles were not bought for the Minister, the anticipated positive effect of this correct piece of information was marred by remarks credited to the DG suggesting that the agency was more concerned about issues of administration and information security that had no bearing on this issue. In this regard, we must bear in mind that the DG was very likely guided by the provisions of the Official Secret Act but which I make bold to state before you must not take precedent over the Freedom of Information Act or the powers of the National Assembly under Sections 88 and 89 of the Constitution.

Let me therefore state finally concerning the above and for the records that there was no attempt at anytime to either deliberately mislead the public or conceal any information regarding this transaction; and also to formally apologise for whatever tension or perception of same as a result of the foregoing. On that note therefore, I stand before you as the Minister of Aviation, a citizen of Nigeria and one of your constituents and affirm the foregoing clarifications.[/quote]So this person thinks she can come out and lie?

This person is saying that such a serious allegation of corruption against her was made and THREE erroneous explanations were made by her subordinate representatives on THREE separate occasions spanning THREE disperse days and she did not feel the need at any point in time to correct them?

This person is saying THREE erroneous explanations were made by her subordinate representatives "without consulting her and others" and NOT a single one of these subordinates has been sacked or punished for such?

Who is the make-up horror, obese cow thinking she is fooling?

So her defence now is that she and her subordinates are all incompetent cretins?

Fulaman198: I have noticed South Africa despite its black majority seem to not use black people for its miss world and miss universe competition. Talk about very low self-esteem. That said, why don't these women use their natural hair. Straightened hair just does not fit them.

Have you seen the black pageant entrants before you came up with your "genius" view?

Tgirl4real: Hello Sir,

Good evening. You are to declare your choice on this thread indicating the topic and position you are arguing for, but your submission would be sent to me on or b4 6pm on the 15th. I will post it on behalf of all the debaters all at once.

Only the Elimination round will be marked annonymously.

I hope I answered your question clearly.

To be frank, I would suggest no one should declare their choice on this thread, they should just send it directly to you.

If all participants decide to declare for 2 of the 3 debate topics and only one person (or even two) declare for the third topic, that can compromise the anonymity desired.

CFCfan: Sagamite: Dark skinned, 5'9", intelligent, loves a good debate, likes to curse, and is definitely not a product of a failed educational system.

5'9" na giant for Sagamu o.

As a matter of fact, I for be record holder.

Eze Promoe: [color=crimson]F9
I'm dark, Yes.
I don't run a business.
I won't be 42 even in the next 10 years.
And I'm very playful especially with ladies [/color]

You will not be 42 even in the next 50 years.

So you have crossed 42 then.

South Africa and Nigeria are hot!

Olanireti: Its abt a yr relatnshp nw. We luv eachoda so much, and of a truth, she is a wife material except 4 her hot tempered and jealousy. Dia was a day she slapped me just because my guy called me 2 cum and see a lady dat dressed half naked. I was so mad at her. Initialy, i didnt do anythng as millions of taught were going through my mind. I reacted badly by beating her. But since dat day, my interest in her depreciated. She regreted her action and seriously begged me. So we moved on. Shes too jealous dat c doesn't wnt to see me wt oda ladies even afta i might ve introduced her 2 dem as my fiancé. On many occasions, she has attempted to stab me wt knife all in d name of jealousy and hot tempered. I tot abt all dis and i asked her to go b4 its too late. She attemptd succide, bt thanks to friends that were arround dat day. Shes is seriously beggng me nw nt to quit wt her. Bt am scared of marring her. Wat suld i do? Won't any of us be victim if we eventualy end up 2geda? Pls, advise me. Sorry 4 taking ur time.

Two seriously fcked up people.

carefreewannabe: JUDAS!

Na you propose you wan disprove my theory and you found a good chef that wants to scramble your precious eggs.

coogar:

where do you reside? i want to quickly move to your neighbourhood so i can benefit from this special week.

coogar: you don't need to be picky - all you wanna do is sleep around to prove a theory that women can also be driven by hormones....

come on - let's collaborate to scramble your eggs.

sparta: you are even dumber than i thought but wait a minute, are you usualy this stupid or you are just trying to annoy me?

The person is still talking?

Is your brain made of cement?

carefreewannabe: No wrinkles yet but I guess I'm too skinny for your taste though I could solve the problem easily if I wanted to
You want my eggs? Well, I have very good genes to pass on but can you afford my botox injections later?

Skinny? Even if you erroneously believe I am not attracted to slim girls (note, not skinny), I can take you to Calabar and deposit you at a fattening camp for 6 months na. Have you heard of Hippo milk?

https://www.nairaland.com/316937/what-nairaland-female-members-pictures/3#4458380

As for botox, my babalawo in Sagamu has a cheap version we can buy and use.

Na N20 a pop.

After another 3 years: https://www.nairaland.com/141689/rough-guide-best-most-reputable/5#6921333

British universities have done well again this year in regards to Nobel prizes, somehow they are connected to 3 out of the 6 Nobels.

- Edinburgh hosts one of the winners of the Nobel prize in Physics who speculated and theorized the concept of the 'God Particle'. The professor did his B.Sc., M.Sc. and PhD at KCL and also previously had short stints teaching at Imperial and UCL.

- KCL also educated another Nobel winner in Chemistry in the same year. He did his B.Sc. in the same Physics at KCL and did his PhD at Cambridge but now teaches at Stanford.

- One of the winners of the Nobel prize for Medicine also spent his 3rd year as an exchange student at University of Edinburgh while undertaking his BA degree at UCLA.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Imperial missed out on hosting a worthy Nobel winner due to the faults/limitations of the awarding of the Nobel prize.

The rules of awarding the Nobel prize includes not awarding it to more than 3 people in a year and cannot be awarded posthumously.

In regards to the God particle discovery, more than 3 people, about 5, had very strong cases to be considered for the Nobel prize this year. Another 6th person that should have won, because his co-researcher is one of the winners, died in 2011 before proof existed.

Peter Higgs (who won the 2013 Nobel) did the research and first suggested that such a particle must exist but this was in 1964 and there was no facilities, or political will, to test his theory which costs a fortune. The test finally began in the 70s and only concluded last year. Two different people actually won a Nobel in Physics in 1999 based on Higgs' work.

Francois Englert (who also won the 2013 Nobel) also did a similar research at the same period as Higgs (1964) with a research partner called Brout (who died in 2011) and they came to the same conclusion.

During the same period, Gerald Guralnik, C. R. Hagen and Tom Kibble also did coincidentally work on this discovery and came up with he same discovery later in 1964 while all 3 of them were working at Imperial. Kibble still works at Imperial.

The Nobel committee have to award to only 3 people and considering that Higgs did it on his own first, Englert and Brout did it second and 3 researchers did it third (all 3 discovery work were independent of each other), they awarded it to Higgs and Englert (Brout was dead so cannot win). They could not recognise just one of the Imperial researchers as all 3 had equal claims, hence Imperial missed out totally.

That is the potential downside of no qualitative analysis of awards when judging performance and reputation.

Edinburgh would still have had an affiliation anyway if Tom Kibble won because he did his B.Sc., M.A. and PhD at Edinburgh before moving to Imperial for his academic career.

stillwater: I know now, it's not too late though, start eating beans.

No need.

I want to be close to those your pins/legs.

carefreewannabe: Good for you that you like to be spoiled. I am very good at it but too old for you
Believe me when I say that MANY men like bitchy behaviours in the same way women like bad boys

If you have wrinkles , get botox injection and we can talk.

The circa 200+ eggs are still very fresh na, innit? I just need a maximum of 3 of them.

I don't do bitchies or hoodrats. I leave those to ghetto thugs.

carefreewannabe: If a man has invested ANYTHING, you owe him AT LEAST an explanation. I agree. But if I have dated you once or twice and don't pick the calls anymore, the message is OBVIOUS! (Concerning finance, I share bills, so I owe nobody ANYTHING after a date or two!)

Maybe you are cool with that, but if many men did the reverse there are several women and their mugu "real men" that would say he is just immature or even a baaaastard.

carefreewannabe: I spoil the man I'm with till they are rotten, that's probably one of the problems. They are good as long as I don't give too much and behave "bitchy". You see Saga, no matter what you do, it doesn't work

That works for me.

carefreewannabe: Concerning the not picking the guy's calls or not replying to messages: What's wrong about it? If you don't pick my call and don't call back, I simply move on! Nothing wrong with it, you OBVIOULY ARE NOT interested and it's ok, I don't need an explanation.I know some people consider it nice when you tell them WHY you are not intersted but I don't care, I consider such moments akward.

Obviously nothing is wrong with that when you have not invested and can just walk away.

https://www.nairaland.com/1120970/should-lady-house-chores-fiance/10#13373282

Obviously the one that has invested the most and will lose that investment would have a different view.

stillwater: Hahaha, I wish I was that bookish. I'm not light skinned either. As for Sagamite, tame who? I would rather fight with him. I'm the type of Nigerian woman that gives him nightmares, the one that snobs him and says 'who you be?'

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT:

She means fight me in bed. She is a feisty lover.

carefreewannabe: 1. I want to exchange love and respect at the right time (I have wanted it since I hit puberty up till now) and in the right manner but I can't find the right person to do so. As I said, either loser and too clingy or successful and an a.zz.

Therefore ...

2. My plan remsembles your plan

(The dating "evils", I am guilty of many of them but I have mostly had good intentions )

Then that is a good thing.

There are very few women like you. And even some of those that are like you have absolutely low consideration for the needs and desire of the guy when they are at their prime, they only think about their needs and desire.

I think those with matching plans should be finding each other as that is coupling efficiency.

As long as you agree for the reverse of the dating evils for men implied here to apply to you and you see it as good intentions too, then no wahala.

https://www.nairaland.com/962850/ladies-which-these-dating-evils/7#11126660

carefreewannabe: Come on Saga, women, MOST WOMEN, want to love someone and be loved in return.

Some of the dating evils are not "evils"! Consider this!

All I am saying is I hope the women want to exchange love and respect at the right time and in the right manner.

If I cannot adjudge it as sufficiently right, I would not be interested that much to sign my life imprisonment papers until I feel "Well, fck it. The sentence would be short now anyway and I am getting too old, and tired, to realistically pull these hot young ones, I can as well sign it now ..............with a prenup simultaneously signed too".

Some of the shaggging is not evil! Na pure fun.

carefreewannabe: Have you ever considered that the reason why women change partners is not because they want to but because they are trying to find THE RIGHT ONE? I swear, I would stick to one but the choice IS between a loser who will be too much around or a successful men who will not be around enough. I don't want either So, I'll wait till the clock starts ticking and then compromise, for the sake of sweet babies , NOT FOR ME. So long, enjoying my life.

Of course, a woman (LIKE a man) who has little chances on the market will settle for less.

They change partners for selfish reasons and choose partners for selfish reasons.

To them it is mostly about the benefits to them, not the interest of the man if they are not interested in him.

https://www.nairaland.com/1433735/ladies-attitude-when-breaking-up/1#18072016

https://www.nairaland.com/962850/ladies-which-these-dating-evils

So why should men act different?

carefreewannabe: Yes, you are messed up Sagamite, you consider it normal to be fooling around, taking advantage of women and constantly putting women down online (not only Nigerian women), you are smart enough to know better. I'm not here to judge. I have my issues too but at least I know better

If I am messed up for catering for my self interest, then women are major league fcked up for being women.

I do not have a bad opinion of women, I have a realistic opinion of women.

I treat them "individually" the way they deserve to be treated.

carefreewannabe:

Thanks for making me smile.

Some peple say I'm confused but that's because ordinary pople can't understand my logic Joking!!!


What woman has f.ucked you up so much that you have such a bad opinion of women?

Do you think women only wisen up because they lose their looks? Don't you think that we get smarter and more eperienced and so on? Don't you think it's only natural (for men and women) to take relationships more seriously the older we get?

But anyway, I think the same about men. The less successful, the nicer. The more successful, the bigger azz ...

Really?

I am fcked up?

Well, women are free to wisen up when they choose. That na their choice and entitlement in a free world which I rationally support.

But, firstly, I am also free to not choose them if they wisen up too late.

Secondly, yes, I do think that women mostly only wisen up when they lose their looks because majority of evidences tell me so. Even overwhelming majority of women that are hot in their 30s still behave like they behaved in their early 20s. That "looks" is serious POWER and they love it. The hotter they are when older the more it correlates with the high chance of them changing partners frequently. They take relationships seriously when they feel the threat of losing their looks or when they are broody to have offspring.

I am not condemning. It is natural! It is a "would be", I accept it and manage the risk to me efficiently. If that is fcked up, then I am uber fcked up!

I do not have a bad opinion of women, I have a realistic opinion of women.

carefreewannabe: You have said that monogamy is not the best option for the fathers and even some mothers, which makes it a bad choice when the preference is on polygamy. Very simple logic. Don't talk yourself out of it. You TALK like polygamy is the best option even though it ISN'T for SO many reasons but to each their own.

And your logic somehow removed the part I said monogamy is the best option for the child?

And your logic somehow came to a conclusion that if something is not the best, then that must "imply" it is bad?

Chineke! Odikwa confused nwanyi!

carefreewannabe: If you think that women over 30 can't be fine, you can continue sleeping around with "lil girls". Again, to each their own. There are enough men out there who have no problem with women getting older and who expect more from their partner than just a young body to f.uck. But how can YOU know when you are not able to have a serious, mature relationship and when you don't even know what for? (I swear, I don't intend to insult you.) AND again if a man is 40-50, a 30 year old is WAY younger and young enough for him. Saying that women must be young to be attractive is like saying a man must be very rich to be attractive. Not true at all!

First of all, I think younger girls are the finest is not an implication that some older women can't be fine too. They are just, on average, less fine and majority of women's game end in their 30s.

Secondly, I am aware there are many men who expect more from their partner than just young body (which I think in the context you mean looks) and they would rather go for personality. I am just in a different subset of men that have a strong preference for both looks and personality.

Thirdly, I can't have a serious, mature relationship and don't know what that is? ....................Really? So it is all my fault. I need to fix up? ............Yeah, I can't have a serious, mature relationship with many women. Most normally have dysfunctional personalities until they lose their looks and all of a sudden their high calms down. By then, I choose not to have a serious, mature relationship, but I would have a good session though with the looks before that, if I can. They should please endeavour to have a serious, mature relationship with me when they have the most to offer to me, so I actually feel it is genuine and not a gimmick to exploit me.

Fourthly, I never said women must be young to be attractive, I said women are more attractive when young. That is a different narrative than your understanding of what I said.

bukatyne: Are you a Christian? If no, we are not on the same level and you cannot understand me how I cannot understand that 'men are polygamous in nature' when God never said so.

If yes, then there is a serious problem somewhere

Fck not!

Over my dead body.

carefreewannabe: I DON'T HAVE TO!
ever heard of birth control pills? The human kind has developed further than that! I can give in to my sexual urges that are very strong for a week once a month without wasting my eggs I have more than my natural instincts, a brain that works very fast

Yep, you are on point. After birth control pills came, women started showing their true colours and their polygamous nature. That said, their arousal is mostly dependent on emotional connection. You just come here and let me have a cup-hold of your brea-st for a few seconds and you will instantly think I have a speech impediment when you see arousal without communication or connection.

As for not wasting your eggs, that is expensive you know. The NHS does not dish that out freely, so that option I think is far from your reach.

carefreewannabe: You always talk like monogamy is a bad choice. It IS for YOU BUT not for every men! MANY men enjoy monogamy. Nothing good comes out of sleeping with different partners at the same time.

You really think that once a woman hits 30, she can't be attractive anymore? I know many 30+ women who are more attractive than Girls in their 20s. Apart from that, even if you are 30, 40 or 50, there will always be much older men, for whom you are Young so cut it please. It doesn't make sense

The sexual drive is a strong force, I agree but intellect is either! For some of us at least!

Now you have chosen to employ sophism against me?

- Where have I ever stated monogamy is a bad choice?

- Where have I ever said all women over 30 cannot be attractive?

Because I state polygamy makes most men happy "implies" (according to your impliyifications) that monogamy is bad?

I don't think women over 30 can be fine but I would open a thread about such?

https://www.nairaland.com/1119730/seriously-hot-older-women-40

carefreewannabe: BTW:
Next time I ovulate, I will take it as an excuse to sleep around!
Women ovulate for a week each month. In this week they are hotter and find men more attractive (BIOLOGY), this is a good excuse to sleep around with multiple men. It's nature, they can' help it

Men, if a woman cheats, it's because she was ovulating, she can't help it, kindly excuse.

Trust me, you will not waste that egg, girl.

You will not risk it on a loser or a flight risk, you will look for a provider and you will try your best to make sure he knows he is responsible and has responsibilities.

Nature is not politically correct!

Nature is a "would be", not a "should have".

bukatyne: My Dear,

You are 100% correct; 'Men are polygamous in nature' is 100% Nigerian BS!

Don't be surprised at all that is going on...

Since the fall of humans, everything has attached women from Satan, men and women themselves!

Adam blamed Eve and since then, the blame game has been played world all over

When they get to hell, they will know if men are polygamous or NOT!

Continue arguing against science and think it will relieve you of your objections.

carefreewannabe: 1. Cultural differences are HUGE! Let's not deceive ourselves. White men are less likely to take this "I produce so much sperm and need to release it" excuse but instead take MORE pride in exposing some self-control unlike their Nigerian counterparts who f.uck almost everything, are well known for having children with different women and spread STDs, which they are also well known for. You focus on biology so much and imply that culture and CHARACTER / ATTITUDE is of less importance. Yes, men all around the world cheat BUT the attitude to cheating in African cultures is different and that for me is the reason why so many people consider African men the way they do (AIDS spreading f.uckers)

Yep, cultural differences are huge. I never said otherwise.

But the huge difference is by no means proof that men of other cultures don't cheat or have the propensity to cheat.

I am sure I have not put up any defence for or against character and attitude so far, so I wonder how you came about my "implication".

carefreewannabe: 2. Human beings are not only primitive biological organisms. Human beings are emotional, intellectual, religious beings. If men only cared for procreating, they would impregnate women and move on without being able to create a bond between them and their children. Yet, men are also emotional and create a bond with their children because UNLIKE animals a human child takes MUCH MORE TIME to grow up than an animal and Needs BOTH a a father and a mother, not only to provide Food but to teach him / her certain things OVER THE YEARS. So don't talk like ALL men are ONLY controlled by their joysticks, primitive and to weak to control their sexual desires.

Emotional, intellectual and religious factors tend to play an inferior part and succumb to natural urges all around the world. Especially when the natural urges is being offered for less stress than usual. Man-made rules are inferior to nature-made rules.

That is why Sagamite is a realist in all his approach in life. I am not a "should have" person, I am a "would be" person. I live my life managing the risk of "would be" rather than living in the fantasy land of "should have". That is why I am a very happy and fulfilled person.

I never said all men are controlled by their joystick. I proffered that men leave the early nurturing to the mother (not later nurturing) and provide the resources required for nurturing. There is enough time to bond with a child and still have time to satisfy polygamous urges. Many men do this.

carefreewannabe: 3. Additionally, MANY men also desire to have a family. The marriage institution was NOT invented by women! You talk as if it's only women who want to get married. Who do they get married with? MEN! Men who were not forced to marry! The monogamous marriage in the West wasn't forced by women BUT implemnted by men! Ask yourself why! 'Cause HUMANS unlike ANIMALS can reason instead of only being controlled by instincts.
The institution of marriage / monogamous relationship is the best solution to raising children and we both know it. You can deceive yourself as long as you want that YOUR children will be as happy as children who grow up in an enviornment where mother and father live happily together BUT fact is that they are not! It takes a lot to build a happy home from MEN and WOMEN and raise emotionally healthy children.
Look at Nigeria, full of men with multiple wives hving more than 10 children that are poorly educated and emotional retards who don't even know their fathers well because their fathers can't give the attention the children need as they are too many.

Yes, of course I agree with you. Many men desire a family so they have an opportunity to provide for and protect their offspring. It is a perfectly natural urge to most men. The ones that tend to not do this are the ones who have judged they cannot get the resources to provide and protect and those that are emotionally fcked up.

That said, men desire to have a family does not mean the model they desire is monogamy. Most men naturally prefer polygamy, it is social conditioning and enforcement that makes them take a monogamous marriage. When Mohammed had the chance, he quickly cemented the opportunity to be entitled to 4.

Yes, the monogamous model is the best option for the child. But definitely not the best option for the father and even most mothers after she feels the father has fulfilled his job of raising the child. If she still had the looks, she would move to the next after the offspring are independent but by then options are extremely limited and risky.

carefreewannabe: P.S.
Your comparisons between animals and humans are quite superficial but if you want to go there, you must also admit that being gay is also VERY NATURAL because there are homosexual animals as well So excuse everything in the Name of biological make-up of an organism

Please show me the homosexual animals. Maybe I am not educated enough to have seen them.

stillwater: Who dash Sagamite tall? Someone that is as short as I am. Yes I'm out to spoil your market!

He is short and loquacious!

In Sagamu, 4ft 11 inches is tall.

I am actually the second tallest in my local Sagamu ward.

preciousfeb: [color=#990000][/color] I am interested in dis subject because it affects me in some way. I am 29 now, got employed in one of d oil coy dis year but I am not ready to marry nt even in d next two years. Howevr I long to have my chidren early. Advice plz

Why do you want to have your children early?

sparta: u got a problem with that? Just because u are a typical example of them dogs dont mean all men sleep around.

You are a person.

Shut up!

[quote author=Okija_juju]Sagamite



Tall
Dark
moustache
Well groomed
Average body build with a slight tummy
Highly opinionated about every and anything
Shy
Easily irritated by people who hold contrary opinions to his.
Does not speak much, but when he does, its a lecture.
Always tries to be proper (whenever he can)
Feels like the 2nd son of God (nwanne Jesus) the next best thing after Einstein
Quite intelligent
Enjoys a debate (hates it when he loses)

Does not curse at people to their faces.[/quote]

Lol at Nwanne Jesus.

Two corrections though:

1) Never been shy in my life. I can walk to any stranger very comfortably and have a chat, I do it everyday.

https://www.nairaland.com/1050781/infidelity-objective-analysis/1#12357044

If you take me to the Oval Office, I can sit with Obama and chat with him like a long lost friend.

It helps to have an arcane knowledge.

2) I never lose a debate.

My nwanne (brother) is the God of Morals and Good Behaviour, I am the God of Logic and Objectivity.

carefreewannabe: Let me tell you something, I never hear men from other nations excuse theirselves as much as Nigerian men do.
ALso when I go to a Nigerian club it's very different from a club, in which majority of men is white. In Nigerian / African clubs men act like hungry i.diots, aggresively approaching women, pulling their arms or even jumping at them from behind while they are dancing. There is a big difference in attitudes and way of thinking, that's why African men are best known for being multiple baby daddies and shameles f.uckers. It's not my fault that this is their reputation because that's what they OFTEN behave like.

Now enlighten me with your scientific research.

Yes, cultural influences are different, but that by no means is not proof that men are not biologically inclined to polygamy.

Even many Western men cheat. Men all across the world cheat.

We humans are animals and animals have traits that have been encoded into each sex to foster their survival.

Both sexes are naturally polygamous but men far more than women because women have something to lose and they have less resources to waste.

Women have 400 eggs which they release once a month till menopause. They need this to procreate and they are wired to procreate with the best option for their offspring survival, so they are selective on choices and utilise these few eggs judiciously. They aint gonna waste "my precious" on some loser. They look for a multiple of things to assess the best option, from looks (good genes) to finance (ability to raise the offspring) to emotional connection (murrafcker aint gonna abandon us). That is why the male has to work hard to impress the female. she has a lot to assess before making a decision to bone. There is a reason why there are no male prostitution industry in any part of the world. Not many women would buy. The time women cheat is mainly when they find a man with a better benefit for creating and raising an offspring or minorly when they have emotional/sexual satisfaction to satisfy.

Now each bust of my glorious and fantastic orgas-m has 300 million murrafcking soldiers. Fck Lawd! I have shyt load to waste in just one fcking bust. Only one swims there and wins. I am wired to just looking for a healthy incubator, which is judged by looks. If women can retain this asset for long and continue attracting men that can cater for their offspring, we will not have the man-made institution called "Marriage". There is a natural desire in men to spread it as much as possible to as many incubators as possible to spread the chance of many offsprings and it is FUN. Men can afford to be wasteful, come on, freaking 300m in one boning, and only one actually does the job some very odd times, hence evolution has wired them to be more polygamous. Since emotions are less of a concern to men, personality of the incubators is less important and many can walk away from their handiwork. He is not carrying anything for 9 months and has no primary nurturing responsibility for about 6 years after it, at best he just provided the resources for the nurturing, so he is free to go off and do it all over again with at least 300m offers to give everyday.

All the real life situations you see around you is not by accident you know. There is some intelligent organisation behind it to enable the continuum of the existence of the ecosystem. That is why I am not an Atheist!


http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2460757?uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21102849647951
http://healthland.time.com/2013/07/30/the-reason-for-monogamy-researchers-disagree/
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200706/ten-politically-incorrect-truths-about-human-nature

Teespice: Sagamite aka sagastica

Average height, dark, very handsome, sticks to his guns, intelligent, can hold a conversation for hours, in reality I know he can be reserved and not be the bull we see here, forget what he says about Nigerian girls, I am very sure his twisted opinions about them will change the moment he sets eyes on that one who will prove him wrong.

Quote me if I am wrong.

Shyt!

This girl surely knows who I am in real life.

The only part missing is I can make a girl crack a rib and need rib replacement with my sense of humour if they spend a day with me.

Caracta: Sagamite: Tall, dark, smokes weed, drinks like a fish, serial flirt, afraid of the dark, caring and bad cook.

Coogar: Short, dark, smokes weed, clubs frequently, lazy, bad cook, intelligent, married with 3 kids.

Caring?

Girl, do you think I am human?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5vulA50tyI

jay bee: Sagamite: unilag reject, birkbeck dropout, Nigeria deportee, allergic to fuktards, God’s gift to women, highly intelligent, underground queer

Yeah, I am a Soho dancer.

Unilag reject?

After seeing Unilag prove homosexuality is wrong using magnets, I would rather go to LASU.