₦airaland Forum

Reyginus: lol. I know ignorance as a disease but not with this kind of signs. Now I know better.
I will you well Mr intellectual.

Shut up!

You should have taken a chance to run when you had the chance, not when you are stuck.

Your intellect is below my feet and I warned you that you are not at the intellectual tier to be engaging in such talk with me.

Fucktardism is a crime. Stop being a criminal.

Logicboy03: Epic fail by sagaminte

1) Strawman- I never said that conjuga visits are the norm in prisons

2) A gay man has gay sex. The only exception is that they man may be bisexual- which is still gay

3) Progressives and liberals are different. Epic fail. What you fail to realise is that they could have overlapping views but they are different. (think of Jew and Christian)


You are too shallow.

You are dumb!

1) You used an exception/a minority case to defend and be the centre piece of your an argument. That is plainly saying it is the norm. If I said women are physically stronger than men because I know some women are stronger than men, then I have daftly (like you) made useless exceptions the centrepiece of my argument.

2) This just shows how moronic you are. Sexually frustrated people doing desperate things are not gay or bi. I told you you were dumb.

3) Cretin. They are different but under the same umbrella when generically judged: http://thesaurus.com/browse/liberal?s=t That is why your daft arse did not ask me if I was a progressive. https://www.nairaland.com/1072447/could-atheism-considered-gay-religion/4#12575678

You are a person.

Your intellect is below my feet.

Reyginus: Did anyone frustrate you in life?
You sound angry. Why?

Is this still your strawman tactics?

So you know you are stuck?

I am not angry, I am a person killer.

Urrgh, Gawd!

Bhuhaghh! That feels so amazing to say out loud.

Am not joking, I slaughter fucktards.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvRG03E-GyY&

Logicboy03: Remember when I destroyed you on progressive vs liberalism?


You were running your mouth and I had to shut you up. Good times

You mean this:

https://www.nairaland.com/1072447/could-atheism-considered-gay-religion/4#12576769

When you did not know conjugal visits are not the norm in prisons?

And your dumb argument that if a prisoner that has no access to woman engages in gay sex, then he is gay?

And you did not know those termed progressives are a form of liberals?

In your dumb world, that is destroying.

Your intellect is below my feet. I will have your for breakfast.

Logicboy03: Reyginius,


Why would you sate time with Sagamite?

He is arrogant and abusive.

He claims to be intellectual, yet he knows little.

You were right to the T until the last assertion.

If there is anything you feel I don't know, please bring it my way now or in future.

I dare you!

Reyginus: We will go there. But before that, you must give us an evidence that you know or capable of knowing.
Is that too much to ask?

It is not too much to ask you put your strawman tactics away and admit it: you lacked the logical thought process to the point you did not know you claimed to know?

Let me let you into a secret. I am pretty good at judging people's intellectual levels by merely reading a few of their posts.

One of the clues to know people that are not that intelligent are:

- They are very poor at analogies.

- They frequently use and have a lot of faith in their senseless village-schools' aphorisms.

It is just a tool and imperiously intelligent guy like me uses to do quick analysis and make a judgement call.

One can see the former in F00028 easily. I could spot the latter in you instantly.

I knew quickly you will be minced meat if I decide to do it but I do like giving people a window out if they do not come at me aggressively or insultingly. Unfortunately your ego and misplaced perception of your "maturity" will not allow you escape throw the window, you decided to stand. That is like a Hyena standing up to a Lion in its territory.

Hyena = E dead!

Reyginus: lol. The very reason you should learn how to understand.

Still strawmanning.

Prove my assertion wrong then. Did you not claim you didn't know despite already making an assertion that is a formulated opinion?

Lets loling while you do that for us.

I told you that some things are above your intellectual tier, you refuse to accept. So lets go there.

Reyginus: @Sagamite.
The truth is, you even need to be taught how to understand.
What is the evidence that you Know?

Before we go that way, put the strawman back in your pocket. Don't think you can change topics on me.

Admit it, you lacked the logical thought process to the point you did not know you claimed to know?

That IS THE truth if we want to talk about truths?

Reyginus: Now I get it.
If I claim not to know but want to know, and you who claim to know keep reminding me that I dont know, even when I made it clear that I dont know, it goes to show that you are not in a capacity to know, because you don't know.
Hope everyone is happy now?

As I suspected, or rather deduced, you lack a good logical thought process.

You did not claim not to know.

You made an assertion A you see as observation and asked for concurment or a view B to be built based on your assertion. That is an automatic claim of "knowing" A.

Reyginus: You still don't get it.
If I claim to be educated and engulfed in wisdom but my character potrays a riff-raff, what would you think of me?

I told you such discussions are above your intellectual level. Drop it!

funkybaby:

Smh !

Mister Intellect.

Reyginus: Do you enjoy missing the point?
I did'nt claim anything. You did.
So, tell me.

I enjoy getting to the point ............quite quickly.

The point is: You are not at the intellectual level to analytically observe and formulate a good opinion on what you are so desperate to discuss. Drop it!

tpia1: i think guys should make themselves marriageable instead of pretending they are that way because of women or whatever.

if your character is bad, its bad, there's no sugarcoating that will make it good as long as you have these personality defects and refuse to recognise them for what they are.

Maybe it is best we should all not marry then?

Reyginus: You still don't get it.
If I claim to be educated and engulfed in wisdom but my character potrays a riff-raff, what would you think of me?

With all due respect, I don't think you are of the intellectual level to know who is educated or engulfed with wisdom.

Leave that to the clerisy. It is above your tier.

Reyginus: We lose our being the moment we begin to take pribe in insulting people.
Sagamite, how do you learn?

Please stop this "there is no smoke without fire"-educated person's aphorisms that you keep on generating.

Please, abeg you.

It is putting caterpillars in my belle.

I am prostrating. Mo bee. I dey beg.

wiegraf: You're supposed to be smart, figure it out

Please don't let me figure it out. Take your chance now.

wiegraf: @f00028

You're making this very hard for me. You've actually made me agree with His Fucktardness. You say wiegraf is abusive then you quote him? You willing to accept your hypocrisy?

When you're being a moro.n and I point out you're being one, that's not abusive (maybe a little, but you're asking for it). If you don't understand at least the basics of an argument, try to stay away from it. Like just now with 'the smoke without fire' thing.

@sagamite, you're still a person


This is what you get when you open threads particularly to flame

For your sake, I am taking that as a mis-spoke and you meant to say @frosbel?

Ada Nri1: A man that doesn't want to get married to avoid being responsible for feeding his wife is not a real man. I don't even want to come accross such men because no matter the size of their di..k They are not men. To me they are like studs with dead spe.rm cells

Biologist, explain to me what research you did to see that they are fake men.

F00028: keep talking fagamite.

Godd.amned mental midget
it seems intellect isn't the only area you come
up short.

Can you see I was right to call you a person?

You cannot defend your madrassa-taught moronic statements?

I am very justified when I call people fucktards. Simples!

I said it all before:

https://www.nairaland.com/1050107/toolz-flaunts-curves-promo-shots/9#12229092

F00028: is that suppose to be "intellectual"?

"There is no smoke without fire"? that's what you call an academic argument in ajegunle?

blaady motorpark debater

This person is so daft he cannot even comprehend the angle of a post.

F00028: no, peewee.
you INADEQUATE blaady foool.
i am not the one who comes on threads bragging about my love life.


btw:

is that what your bf says ?

You are a person!

What you need to explain to us is that when a muslim commits armed robbery, according to your madrassa education, does that mean he did it in the name of Islam?

Did IBB and Abacha loot in the name of Islam?

That is what you should be explaining to show I was wrong for calling you a person. I never call people that are not fucktards fucktards.

Explain that and stop exposing your fagg fantasies.

phemieojelabi: [size=14pt]Resign or step aside 4 those who are capable of handling a nation! [/size]

Well said!

Why don't you add:

- The dearth of women with the right qualities makes it extremely hard to see a good choice.

- The modern-day value proposition of marriage is inferior to being single after weighing pros and cons.

Gbawe: The main "priority" , regarding a Nigerian President, is the concept of how our number 1 citizen must possess unimpeachable sincerity - given how troubled and ruined our Nation is.

When the president is , first and foremost, a man who is sincere to himself, his job and to Nigerians then he will have no qualms taking on and defeating the cabals and vested interests ruining all sectors of National life i.e education, health, power, infrastructure, aviation, security, agriculture etc, etc.

Well said, bruv.

Obviously GEJ is not the kind of individual we can pass such priority to.

The same person that will not prosecute officials that were bribed in Nigeria despite numerous of the bribers being jailed abroad and have confessed?

The same person that will negotiate for a corrupt Oil Minister to sell Oil Block to multi-nationals for $1bn?

Nigerians goofed. We have to wait till 2015.

aare07: Education first..............
from primary level to Higher Institution should be free..........

This is practically not possible in Nigeria. Where will the funds come from?

You will end up sacrificing quality for quantity.

If you are going to do free Higher Education, then it has to be to a limited few that are the most talented to reduce the cost and maximise the benefit. Completely merit-based!

We all know merit-based programmes are impossible in Nigeria at the moment, especially under foooools like Jonathan.

marvelck: 5. Greed: surprisingly we also have guys who are reluctant to settle down as a result of greed. they feel the woman is only coming to eat their money and food. they see women generally as a burden. and are not ready to take such burden. this category of guys are those ones that are stingy to their girlfriends. they hid their money from their girlfriends or pretend as if they dont have. they only give a girl money whenever
they want to sleep with her. these ones patronize prostitutes alot. they enjoy being single and living alone. They simply dont want to share their comfort/money with any woman.

These are some of the reasons I know of. But if you know of any other one, feel free to add it to the ones I've mentioned.

Some of you need to go back to school and learn basic English.

How is the description here termed "Greed"? It is "greedy" not to want to spend your money (that YOU worked for) on someone you did not give birth to?

[quote author=Okija_juju]As for the Conductor, they sometimes are mad in the way they address people.

The real scenario surrounding the mis-behavior of the policeman in mufty is like this:

The Danfo driver left the road, goes to the verge or off-road to start bullying all pedestrians who were not on the road in the first place.

The policeman was in mufti, so The Danfo driver threated him with disdain, threatening to hit him off the place. This police like civilian will be so surprised that he was not on the road, yet the danfo driver still came to where he was cursing him and abusing his family on issue that is not supposed to be If he had maintain the regular line on the main road.
The conductors are so stupid while they utter their so rude comments to threaten pedestrians of his readiness for death even when they(Danfo Drvivers/conductors) are absolutely wrong.
This victim was wrong and so unlucky because the Policemen in mufti was not just a civilian they use to harass.

The real story said, they stepped on him(police-in-mufti). It means they wanted him to leave for them to pass,
probably he insisted he was not on the road. so he maintained his standing position in the bus stop or road side. For that action only, Imagine what the Danfo Drivers and his able conductors would have done.
Conductors can even be bold enough to push him off or tell his driver to push him off their way.

While I do not support police's brutality, Most Danfo Drivers and their conductors are heartless with the way they treat pedestrians.
I am not heartless, but trying to be fair and not just allow emotions to becloud me.[/b]
http://www.punchng.com/metro/policeman-kills-bus-conductor-for-stepping-on-him/[/quote]I can't see that account of what happened in the link you provided.

F00028: wasn't talking to you, mental midget ( and midget in other ways)
and stop stalking me. i no dey roll lyk dat!

btw:

is that what your bf says ?

person, do you honestly feel the need to share your sexual fantasies with us?

Sick mooron!

F00028: you should sagamouse that.

Shut up, person!

[quote author=Okija_juju].. You have to re-trace the origin of the problem.. The Danfo driver was driving on the shoulder (sidewalk, corner of the road). He used his bus as a weapon to drive away pedestrians from the road.. He could have killed someone.. the Danfo Driver and his Conductor were breaking the law, . He got to another pedestrian (a plain cloth police officer) that stood his gorunds and refused to budge.. Rather than fall back into his lane, he proceeded to assault the pedestrian by allegedly stepping on him amidst insults.. This led to his conductor getting shot! This is another case of police recklessness.. However, the Danfo was breaking the law..[/quote]I didn't see this is the news report or link. Where did you see this?

Reyginus: Ofcourse I know. I've had enough of it to last me a lifetime.

Then I would suggest you desist from throwing aphorisms that betrays the secret of what educational system churned you out.

When you make such aphorisms as highlighted, it really tempts the production of the cutting daggers.

You don't put a Lamb in Lion's cage for overnight shelter and then wonder in the morning what happened.

Cyberspace is not the place to demonstrated "academic" arguments like "There is no smoke without fire" as your proofing system.

[quote author=Okija_juju]GBAM!!!

And this is what they dont understand..

The first problem here was the DANFO driver and his conductor.. If they didnt start shiit, their wouldnt be no shiit..

They gave the Police man a reason (however stupid or unjustifiable) to shoot at them.. [/quote]There is NO REASON to shoot at them!

Worse still, shoot to kill.