₦airaland Forum

Bblak:
@olanajim, enjoy your status while it last jare.have a beautiful val
@easybaby, enjoy the day dear, notin do u
@mohawkchic, thanks deary.hope u have a lovely week too.Happy val
@Ifyalways, being a long time dear.missed you too honey. Happy valentine
@Sylvex, how has it been love.have a splendid val day_{Guess rocky is dere with u}
@Rockiedink, have a jolly kool day.have fun but use c********
@Seun001, have a great day.
@all, Best wishes.

********HAPPY VALENTINE********

how was ur day too!mine was great and super with my darling rove, Ify shebi na

hmmmmmmmmm!!b4 this gets too far, i think i should claim my prize na.e don go too far sef,but i trust my darling na.am still watching from the sidelines fighting over somebody elses babe.

Ify,shey make i show them my true colour of make i just chill,anyways sha i forgive them for they know not wot they do.

rockiedink:
@ifyalways
wetin you think say do me? like the song goes: nothing do me. your brother dey kampe even pass obj! na work wan been kill my poor head. if not for you know who i for don die.

@bblak, ifyalways, sauce, seun001
happy vals day to y'all. make una have fun with the one you love. . .

@sylvex
never worry sweetheart. you know say our own na special. watch ya mail box.

best wishes to u too.cheers.

tytylayor:
u send them?
them go follow u chop your cane?
follow your mind joh

Jairzinho:
this thread still dey?

no be u start am,

oruonye:
so any single, goodlooking,hardworking guy out there.

hmmmmm,na wa oooo!

saucekid:
new status:
happily in kuvuki parliament with big booty flown in

no use gwarra gwarra hit am for face oooo!and remove bottled laxatives from view,

ifyalways:
. . . .whats up people ?
Bblak,sylvex,rockiedink,ndumart,zignoor,kooldamsel,victor4u eta ll hope we are all ok.any change of status yet ?
seun001,lrove you plenty dear.stay safe .

@all have fun and be good.

i dey oooo!!missed u badly tooo !!

kola oloye:
@ify,
       WE HAVE DELAYED THIS GAME LONG ENOUGH.
I`VE COME TO CONFIRM THAT THE COURSE IS NOT TEMPORARILY UNDER REPAIR,
ALSO YOU HAVE TO CHECK THE SIZE OF MY CLUB BECOS:
1.    I DON`T WANT TO DAMAGE THE HOLE
2.    I WANT TO PITCH TENT IN THERE AND
3.    TO MAKE SURE THAT I COULD STRIKE FROM EVERY ANGLE WITHOUT OBSTRUCTION
        MY SHAFT IS EAGERLY WAITNG,

[size=18pt]wow![/size]

errrrrrr, emmmmmm!

justbones:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
gam·ine /ˈgæmin, -ɪn, gæˈmin/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[gam-een, -in, ga-meen] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a neglected girl who is left to run about the streets.
2. a diminutive or very slender girl, esp. one who is pert, impudent, or playfully mischievous.
–adjective
3. of or like a gamine: a gamine personality; clothes for the gamine figure.
[Origin: 1895–1900; < F; fem. of gamin]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
ga·mine (gā-mēn', gām'ēn) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. An often homeless girl who roams about the streets; an urchin.
2. A girl or woman of impish appeal.



[French, feminine of gamin, gamin.]

ga·mine' adj.
(Download Now or Buy the Book)
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
WordNet - Cite This Source - Share This
gamine

noun
1. a homeless girl who roams the streets
2. a girl of impish appeal

WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.

u got issues with her hmmmm!

kam27:
I've had my Laptop for more than a year and It's AMD (Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology). To be sincere the system is Ok.
Why condemn AMD?

i guess u haven't been using ur sys heavily,

i hope the SA president does not have a nigerian as his special adviser on power/energy matters.

or how do you explain this.its gonna slow down their economy.i better inform my 'NNA' asap or better still form a joint venture.
more issues affecting the hosting of the world cup,

ifyalways:
sorri thuggy.i was busy trying to get the wannabe come back to defend his words that i barely had time to read the post.would do so morrow prolly.
@nit-wit where went thou?now i know you are one of those people tha spew rubbish only when am not around.come on now and play it while its hot.daft skull

dear,are u sure this is u?y are you this angry hmmm?

well,its been proven that the funniest cracks are about sex so my guy bring it on, the were welll funnnnnnnnnnny!

ifyalways:
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet seun am glad to have you back dear.all for myself .what i want?you know nah, ok i want. . . i want. . . stay safe sweetie.
@rockiedink na waoooo,don't tell me you don't know where madam is ?
Bblack dear whats gwan?
zignorr + easybaby ,don't keep me waiting for long.
sauce + kooldamsel enjoy

@all enjoy your live your status notwitstanding

ifyalways:
seun001  ,it aint funny again.

am sorry dearie,the last time i joined the [b]ban[/b]dwagon, i kind of took up somethings that i was deferring and it's always taking my time.anyways na because of u ooooooo!!!if not,
how are you doing  and vals is a couple of days away guess am going to make it up to u.just mention anywhere u want to go, i mean anything, and u are going to be pleasantly surprised.

hmmmm,better late than never,

this is february 1 but still many happy returns, i guess i can't request for my cake now abi, leftover still dey

Dual Core:
https://forums.ratedesi.com/images/smilies/bannedsmiley.gif

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
microwaved a phone, please don't let her try it again oh, cos u just might be telling another story here.

i think dual core lecture is too complicated and will probably confuse him more.use an hot air blower,if it doesn't work properly then see a phone repairer that has the equipment to dismember the phone part to clean it with methylated spirit.
again microwaved,

@toshmann,

now that is mind-blowing.i hope we do get more people that are God-focussed and not the notice me kind of attitude.

timmyjames:
hi eniola can i be your defender of the universe? timmy james from lagos nigeria. 08067296460, 08078456660

HMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!

tkb417:
Niggar
where in hell is this?
is this Onitsha?

right on target bru!

Jairzinho:
I think its:

ACTIVATE INTERLOCKS _{(interlocking something something)}

DYNOFIRMS CONNECTED _{(you know dynamo etc)}

INFRA-CELLS UP _{(like infra red & stuff)}

MEGA THRUSTERS ARE GO !!! _{( 'mega' was a common supeer hero cartoon word back then ,Thrusters i.e boosters etc)}

This is always followed by :
LETS GO VOLTRON FORCE !!!!,

then of course tan-ta-ta-ra tan-ta-ta etc

i think this is already too long and not related to the topic but still some enlightenment wouldnt hurt .hmm.



"At this time, all electronic devices, including cell phones and two-way pagers, must be turned off and put away. After takeoff, I'll let you know when you may use approved electronic portable devices."

Of course, those "approved electronic portable devices" won't include your cell phone, not until after you land.

The reason is that cell phones interfere with the airplane's electronics, right?

Well, no, actually. The risk posed by cell phones to airplane equipment is unknown, and will remain unknown for as long as possible.

Phones are banned for two official reasons:

   1. Cell phones "might" interfere with the avionics (aviation electronics) of some airplanes.

   2. Cell phones aloft "might" cause problems with cell tower systems on the ground.

Both of these risks are easily tested, yet somehow neither the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) nor the Federal Communications Commission has been able to get a definitive answer in the past 20 years as to whether phone calls in flight cause these suspected problems. (The FAA is responsible for the flight safety portion of all this, and the FCC is responsible for the cell tower part.)

The government's dirty little secret is that it cultivates uncertainty about the effects of phones in airplanes as a way to maintain the existing ban without having to confront the expense and inconvenience to airlines and wireless carriers of allowing them.

Why airlines want the ban

The airlines fear "crowd control" problems if cell phones are allowed in flights. They believe cell phone calls might promote rude behavior and conflict between passengers, which flight attendants would have to deal with. The airlines also benefit in general from passengers remaining ignorant about what's happening on the ground during flights, including personal problems, terrorist attacks, plane crashes and other information that might upset passengers.

One way to deal with callers bothering noncallers would be to designate sections of each flight where calling is allowed -- like a "smoking section." But the ban is easier.

Also: If real testing were done, and the nature of the problem fully understood, it would become obvious that airplanes could be designed or retrofitted with shielding and communications systems that would enable safe calling through all phases of flight. But that would cost money. The ban is cheaper.
However, the airlines know that some kind of plane-to-ground communication is coming, and they want to profit from it. Simply allowing passengers to use their own cell phones in flight would leave the airlines out of the profit-taking. Airlines would prefer that phones be banned while they come up with new ways to charge for communication, such as the coming wave of Wi-Fi access. Meanwhile, the ban is potentially more profitable.

Why carriers want the ban

Cell phone and tower designs are based on the assumption that at any given time, only a few cell towers will be close to any specific phone. So any given tower will use different channels than those used by other towers closest to it, but will use the same channels as towers farther away. However, when a phone is used in an airplane, it might have roughly equal access to two or more towers that use the same channels, which confuses the carriers' computer systems. This situation might result in interrupted calls, reduced system capacity and other problems.

Of course, this could be fixed in any number of ways, including an overhaul of the software used to manage calls between towers, but the fix would cost money. The ban is cheaper.

Why the government wants the ban

Cell phones and other electronics vary in how much they could interfere with avionics. If it's determined that some devices do cause problems, all gadgets would have to do extra certification testing, which the government doesn't want to spend the money to do. The ban is cheaper.

Also: No FCC or FAA chairman wants to sign off a change in the rules because if a cell phone does cause either an airplane crash or a cell tower computer system crash, they don't want to be blamed. Keeping the ban is the safe decision for the politically ambitious. The ban is easier.

What are the facts?

DVD players, laptops, portable game machines, CD players, MP3 players all radiate energy, and theoretically could cause interferences with GPS systems, communications equipment and the airplane's interaction with distant navigational systems.

US. airlines alone carry on average some 2 million passengers per day. If just 1% of these passengers accidentally or deliberately leaves their cell phones on, that means some 20,000 cell phones remain on during flights every single day. Despite this, no crash has ever been definitively attributed to cell phone or gadget interference.
Many headsets used by private pilots come with jacks for using them with cell phones. The manufacturers say they're for use on the ground only. But many private pilots use them in the air without incident.

Cell phones are used in airplanes every day, and no crash has ever been definitively attributed to cell phone or gadget interference.

The TV show MythBusters "busted" as a myth the conventional wisdom that phones interfere with avionics.

However, a Carnegie Mellon University study conducted some four years ago found that portable electronics interfere with airplane systems -- especially GPS -- even more than previously feared.

The Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), a nonprofit corporation that advises the FAA, studying the effect of phones on avionics. The RTCA is also looking at technologies that would minimize any disruption, including the use of ultrawideband frequencies and extremely low-power cellular phone systems. They're predicting a definitive answer to all this, but don't hold your breath.

Just this week, the FCC officially dropped its inquiry into lifting an existing ban on using cell phones during commercial flights. The FCC said after the ruling that "given the lack of technical information in the record upon which we may base a decision, we have determined at this time that this proceeding should be terminated."

So the ban remains in place because the government can't seem to come up with definitive answers.

But does that even matter? Interference problems could be overcome with well-understood techniques of shielding, reprogramming and other technology designed to facilitate safe calls.

(When I say "we," I mean we Americans. In Europe, they're working on both legalizing and facilitating calls on airplanes.)

What's wrong with the ban?

The government's reasoning for banning cell phones in airplanes is weak, lame and evasive.

Don't buy the government's bull about electronic interference. The truth is that the ban is cheaper and easier for airlines, carriers and the government than mustering the political will and leadership to make in-flight cell calls a reality.
Here's another problem with the government's abdication of responsibility on this question: Either phones and other gadgets can crash airplanes or they can't. If they can, then we've got a serious problem on our hands, and airplanes need to be upgraded to protect the public safety.

What's to stop terrorists from testing various gadgets, finding the ones with the highest levels of interferences, then turning on dozens of them at some crucial phase of flight, such as during a landing in bad weather?

If gadgets can't crash planes, then the ban is costing billions of hours per year of lost productivity by business people who want to work in flight.

For the government to avoid knowing the answer is incredibly irresponsible.

Clearly, using cell phones is a public benefit, not to mention a business benefit. Shouldn't the airlines and the regulatory agencies figure out how to make that happen?

We can put a man on the moon -- and let him chat with his friends in Houston for the whole trip. Surely, we can solve the problems associated with in-flight cell calls.

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9015839&pageNumber=1

Why not jammers,
It's simple really, the reason some electronics MAY interfer with navigational equipment is because of the rf (radio frequency) radiation that SOME devices 'leak' out or transmit on are close to frequencies used in aviation.
For a jammer, for instance, to jam a cell phone it would have to work on those same frequencies as the device your trying to stop,
Secondly, some devices don't transmit interfering frequencies intentionally, but rather 'leak' those frequencies as a result of being used. ie: printers, cd players, pc periphials etc,
A jammer won't stop this leaking rf , only add to the problem by creating even more stray rf,

hope this helps,

God bless you!

you will probably jam the aircraft equipment instead of the phones.


and by the way,phone signals does not interfere with aircraft navigational equipments,its been proven again and again.i'll try dig up some info relating to this asap.but because its still been studied and besides, it presents some form of decorum in enclosed spaces like an aircraft thats y the policy has not been reversed.
you can imagine an 'Ina' guy or an 'Ilesha' man yapping away beside you in an airplane.

Seun .:
Hi! Am new. Really aprc8 to meet friends. I want you to make me feel that naira land is real meeting up with friends.

piracy, of the highest order,

hunter777:
tHE GOOD OLD DAYS, Was gisting with a childhood friend of mine 2day nd we talked about programs we watched as kid

1----- JIMBO d Aeroplane
2-----Dempsey and Makepeace
3-----Moon Lighting
4-----Tour of duty
5-----[b]P.S I Love You[/b]6-----Jake and the fat man
7-----Famous Five
8-----Hot Cash (Willie Willie)
9-----Speak Out (kola masha nd denrele)
10---Matlock

please guys and babes,please contribute more to this wonderful discussion

now that is a wonderful favourite.there was also another series on NTA 5 cant really remember the name i think its Super Force.

Blue Lion signing out.

Besides,most of the cartoons are targeted at making children dummies.check out teletubbies.totally disgusting i'll say.
Atom ant and Super ted were also favourites.

Ok,my best cartoon ever.can still remember myself jumping Go Go Go Go voltron and my best part is when he draws his blazing sword oh la la, my 'o' my.
i usually drew my sword too and well i did break a few things that earned me a lot of punishment.though my sword didnt exactly divide my enemies into two but at least  it broke them into like a couple of pieces.lol  .
really loved when they when to search for the lions too.

besides i heard last year that some promoters where thinking of making a film about voltron.i hope they finish this year.and my best lion was Blue lion.


by the way,i playED the link in my office purposely leaving to volume high and u can guess,both guys and gals surrounded my system,even my oga use style to peep before dispersing everybody.

hmmmm,na wa ooo!

ifyalways:
infobaba so you are back? anytime i remember how and what happened,i keep wishing i can atleast slap that small boi  is seun 001 and dual core back too?

sister Efuah,how bodi.perharps you should send him a private mail 4 that.i was not happy about it too.am on top fufu and light soup + red red.come join me if you can 

uzzyan am fine boo.just chilling.

hmmm!i'm back ooo!alive and kicking.finally caught the bug plus it was refreshing, hows the house.