₦airaland Forum

StephenP:
So are you guys going to a room yet?

skyone:
whether you go to church on sunday or moonday na u sabi, but remember our day of reckoning is at hand and every man for himself. So if you wish go to church or if you wish you can continue hailing the devil.

skyone:
I pray you see but for now stop blaspheming however is your choice

davidif:
@siskil

Quote

oh my my, are you CRAAAAAZY, i don't mean to disrespect you but are you really REALLY high?? its obvious you know nothing about acting, because of someone was in a successful movie doesn't make them a great actor, geez why do you think they have never been nominated for an Academy Awards (The oscars don't lie), none of them have even won a golden globe or even a SAG award. omo, stop am o, acting is aaaaaaaa lot more than appearing in big budget movie anybody can, heck, wasn't transformers a mega hit, but it was an extremely horrible, i mean horrible movie. The plot was pathetic, the casting was just awful but that didn't stop it from being a hit. If you want to know what acting is about, go and watch the movie "malcolm X", or go read it up online, then come talk to me.

Geez, Katherine freakin' Hiegl

CH3COO:
only if you explain, in sufficient detail, the motive behind your analogy between monk and avg. joe as relates to the topic. is will really that bad?

CH3COO:

busta what makes her then because she said she is married and she is living the her husband right now under the same roof. while she is fu cking some man WHAT MAKES HER?Huh

savanaha:
Isn't your anti-thesistic theory (nw) the same for DW or so people say. Even in his Training Day movie the media later chastized him for playing the bad guy with a good heart. I just feel that some people are cast into the same role even when they try to get out of it. Look at Eddie Murphy or Will Farrel or me. They try to be serious and most people don't get it because they are type cast. Thats just that.

Malcolm X transformed Washington's career, turning him, practically overnight, into one of Hollywood's most respected actors. He turned down several similar roles, such as an offer to play Martin Luther King, Jr., because he wanted to avoid being typecast. The next year, in 1993, he took another risk in his career by playing Joe Miller, the homophobic lawyer of a homosexual man with AIDS in the movie Philadelphia starring Tom Hanks.

ladyolis:
umm you are a real bitch why did you marry him @ 1st, well that will teach him to marry his own people

KarmaMod:
Exactly! So may people don't understand. They think 'oh been in a big blockbuster = best actor". That's NOT the case

Alot of GREAT actors are in independent movies or movies that don't even gross as much. They are picky with the scripts they choose. They choose to be in movies that represent their talent, not CGI action stuff. And Its like most people don't even know that the movie is usually a blockbuster because of the plot or story and not just for the actors.

Personally alot of actors I respect and adore and find them utterly talented are hardly in "blockbuster movies", but hey that's me. Christian Bale is one of my favorite actors and he just started getting true recognition when they made him Batman whereas he has way better movies under his belt

KW: Did you feel that it was financially risky to release a big-budgeted, CGI creature feature at Christmas time?

WS: I’m a student of the patterns of the universe. If I can figure out how something is seemingly risky, but I have the numbers on my side, I get really comfortable taking a leap. When I first came to Hollywood, I said to my manager, James Lassiter, “I want to be the biggest movie star in the world!” He said, “Okay, we should probably figure out what they do, and plot a course.” So, he went and got the top ten movies of all time. We watched them to try to figure out what were the patterns. And ten out of ten of them were special effects movies. Nine out of ten were special effects movies with creatures. And eight out of ten were special effects movies with creatures and a love story. So, Independence Day was not really a hard call to make when you look at the numbers. Therefore, I Am Legend, in concept, is not a hard call to make.

http://www.disilgold.com/moviereviews.html

Will Smith Plays It Safe

Written by: Angela P. Cobb

Smith stuck in his own form of typecasting.

Actor Will Smith fancies a sure thing. He steers clear of films that are not big-budget blockbusters, as he is dubious of the chances such films have of succeeding financially, WENN reports.

Smith has remained comfortable in the action and sci-fi genres. Films such as Men in Black and Independence Day have grossed at the box office and made him a mega star. However, such successes have also made Smith unwilling to push the envelope, fearing a flop.

“I fear that if I don't do that 'Will Smith' thing, then it won't be successful,” the 39-year old actor admits.

However Smith is aware of such fears and perhaps will conquer them. He predicts that he still has plenty to do in the industry. “I think the next four or five years are going to be my innovative prime,” he plans.

http://thecelebritycafe.com/features/17185.html

Mr Will Smith goes to Washington

Here's Smith talking about how he and his manager measured box office patterns from a Top 10 list of all-time movie hits - and this, mind you, before he'd made a movie: "We realised that 10 out of 10 had special effects. Nine out of 10 had special effects with creatures. Eight out of 10 had special effects with creatures and a love story." Cue the elements familiar to us from Independence Day, I, Robot, the Men in Black films, Bad Boys, and this year in I Am Legend and Hancock.

http://film.guardian.co.uk/patterson/story/0,,2288798,00.html

davidif:
SEAN PENN AND JACK NICHOLSON ARE THE GREATEST ACTORS OF OUR TIME. while the great legendary MERRYL STREEP IS THE GREATEST ACTRESS IN OUR OWN ERA.

tpia:
Negro Ntns, my understanding of that proverb is that a wise person will hold a live fish by the head, while a foolish person will grab it by the tail,  thus letting the fish wriggle out of his grasp.  Its not even as if I'm a stellar Yoruba scholar. Kindly explain what dialect you got your own translation from.


Same logic behind catching a snake- you hold it by the head, not the tail.

I can't believe I'm even posting on this kind of dumb thread.

also explain why it would matter where anyone held a dead cooked fish? Which would also have been sliced into steaks?  I don't know if your translation is tongue in cheek or if you actually believe what you posted.