₦airaland Forum

Sagamite:
Some moronic ediots think they can be an irritating and vulgar nuisance. I never give them an inch of satisfaction.

Not one inch.

I troll the troll. I become more vulgar than the vulgar. I make it more senseless than the senseless want to make it senseless.

I drop to their level and frustrate them at it. I am proficient in psychology and know how to eliminate any unit of utility they are trying to get. There is a method in my madness.

Every fcking ediot that has tried to troll me on NL has had to give up because I am good at trolling them more than they can troll me. I can give you a roll call of these fuuktards.

They need to know the only reasonable way to engage Sagamite is through intellectual debate. One in which they would be slaughtered in anyway.

If you watch this fuuktard, BananaBender and their likes, you would see that all their utterances in their engagement with me is senseless, so I just psychologically, selectively and (most importantly) effortlessly manage them like the cretins they are with boring repetitions.

I am their Nemesis!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aocAU7nW3D8

Okay

[quote author=Sagamite post=27329697]Sorry, do you mind explaining this:

For example, a contract to sell 20% of an identified parcel of 1000 shares is seen as practically and theoretically different from a contract to sell 200 shares from the same parcel. Whether any practical difference is actually intended by the parties is often doubtful.
The intending purchaser in both cases will almost invariably want independent ownership of 200 shares⎯with the degree of corporate control that entails⎯not a 20% interest in every one of the 1000 shares. In a very practical sense, the same is even more likely to be true of a contract for the sale of 20% of a stock of 1000 bottles of identically labelled wine

Please?

Sagamite:


Fuuktard, are you now denying you are not an homosexual who's father is his brother?

drop this, please?

Sunnybobo3:
Have you ever sat down to ponder on why MKO/Kingibe Muslim/Muslim ticket won in 1993 but did not rule?

Our God is a consuming fire bro.

Buhari/Idiagbon - Muslim/Muslim

Well?

Onegai:
Hair regimen (do I really have one sef)

Moisturise with my own blend (water, coconut oil, Herbal Essences moisturiser, aloe vera gel, glycerin), seal with Olive oil[b] (I finally got some original!)[/b] And a blend of cocoa butter, shea butter and almond oil (I scented it with citrus and lavender oil)

I used to wash with clay from Natural Nigerian and another clay soap. But now I use Gentelle conditioner (I think it's fake) to wash, then finish with my condish mix.

I dc with mayo, egg, honey, oils and add any remaining product I have, that I don't think worked (eg Emily Millionaire conditioner). This is like once a month.

Once in a while, I oil my scalp with JBCO

I'll probably buy Petals conditioner to be washing my hair or get some clay soap.

There is no original, but quality differs from one brand and supermarket to another

I believe any good DC is okay and you do not need all natural expensive products nonsense.

All you need to do is to apply your products correctly, avoid tight hairstyles, avoid excessive hair styling, minimise handling and moisturise daily.

Mrchippychappy:
Keep deceiving yourself . Yoro's never supported GEJ . You guys wanted him to fail right from his first day in office.

Most Yoruba supported GEJ in 2011, an indisputable fact.

dammytosh:
There is nothing called proportionality when there is a Law and guideline.

IT is either you take it or go home.

Who is your political science tutor?

dammytosh:
What is wickedness ?

There are laid down rules and there are also consequences for breaching them.

If you can not cope, write Jamb and go to Federal University.

Bunch of spoilt Shudren. In "Mama Peace voice"

There is something called 'proportionality'

coolebux:
As in? As per?
When dis guy eventually hears dis story,
Believe you me, he'll break your heart

But that is your job, clean up your guy jareh.

What job?

How humane of you to think it is okay to undermine someone's effort because it is her supposed responsibility. If he is bent on living like a pig then he is more than welcome to. Her responsibility is to make sure the home is presentable at all times but it does not cover cleaning up after others especially a grown ass man

You should have also requested her to spoon feed him, wipe his ass, brush his teeth, polish his shoes and tie his shoelaces because it is her job to care for him.

Truckpusher:
I bet your lame asss can't stand that face one on one bro........stop the woman wrappering thing .It doesn't pay ,just be yourself.

Look at it again and tell me if that's an everyday face you see in your hood .

carefreewannabe:
He lacks proper home training and his brain has been damaged by all the cheap weed he has been smoking.
Don't mind him.
Look at HIS photo

Yeah,
he looks so unkempt and yet had the gut to call someone fat

Truckpusher:

Too harsh

The poor woman has just given birth, how else do you expect her to look

Yields:
I do yarn wraps or yarn braids/twists most of the time. I keep them in for a month to a month 1/2. Wash and DC every two weeks. I shampoo first, rinse with water then rosewater, then DC. I dilute both the shampoo and DC with lots of water. I concentrate on my scalp and rinse thoroughly to get the products out. Rinse out excess water and let try. Once it's dry I massage my scalp with wheat germ oil, olive oil and JBCO (jamaican black castor oil) to moisturize my scalp and prevent dryness. I clarify once a month. My regimen is pretty simple and I like it that way.


I've never done an hot oil treatment since going natural. I guess my hair has never really needed it. It was something I did back when I was relaxed. I prepoo with coconut oil sometimes before shampooing though and I use a DC by Palmers too; it makes my hair really strong, but I would love to do an hot oil treatment! It can't hurt, so I'mma try it. I love experimenting with oils in my hair anyway.


How do you wear your hair on a daily basis? Do you do protective styles?

I put them in plaits or single braids of six weekly. I tried bunning for a while but always ended up it with the most painful headaches ever.

kilokeys:
hmm. being single is d best.. no drama.. at these babes wowo.. chai..
i think poverty is a bastard. u could actually get more reasonable girls among d rich than some broke chics under d influence of lack.
ill stay single till i wanna marry abeg

Good choice

No, it is not, it is very convenient to blame poverty, I believe their problem is more spiritual

Besides it is more of a Nigerian thing

kilokeys:
oboi.. i couldnt watch it to the end.. so pissed.. was it staged? or what.. o boi.. STI distributors

No, it was not

It is sickening

Sagamite:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lw3uAqT2iQE

You can't cry now...Oro buruku tohun terin

funshyboi:
all those you mentioned are cool, buh wats the moral in dat arugba movie ?

Arugba was produced for cultural reasons

Forever

Sagamite:
A more sensible way of asking the question is:

"Were you enlightened because some girls showed you that they can be mean and inconsiderate when you have less finances?"

Abajo

Sagamite:
What about if it is karma that is making these women single mothers and have the tables turned on them?

As maternal said, many of these girls would have their head up their arsse and be belligerent to suitors they don't like (or even like) before the single motherhood. Only to be humble and reasonable after they are now at a disadvantage.

It is well known that majority of black women have a stinking attitude when relating to men, unfortunately it is not tattooed on their heads which ones are but it can be comfortably said majority are, so why should men be considerate and self-less to the ones that end up unfortunate?

And don't give us all that "real man", "strong man" crap.

Most women tend to be reasonable mainly only when the disadvantage is theirs. If they face no disadvantage, they are unreasonable and don't consider others' feelings. It is all "me, me, me".

Agreed

But what about majority of black men who find it difficult to understand 'I am not interested or I have a boyfriend', you have no idea how annoying that could be especially if you are the type that hates going back and forth on a simple issue. You have to pretend to be nice while they going on about how much they care for you till you snap, and they resort conveniently to emotional blackmail, 'it wasn't your fault, I was the one that thought you were special or I am good-looking, successful and intelligent enough to get any other if not for my feelings for you bla bla bla'.

I wish they could hear themselves speak


Another category is those who after saying a Capital 'NO' will start treating you like a piece of trash, talk to you as if you are their little siblings, denigrate you like their maidservants. They get so rude and condescending that you have no alternative than to give them a piece of your mind.

I call it emotional torture, and to most the solution lies in saying yes only for them to treat the guys as they deem fit. So whose fault it is? The lady would be blamed and the guy is practically blameless. A lady that says yes after several no(s) is worth investigating , It could be out of genuine reasons like change of mind, realisation, new feelings or not so genuine reasons like an alternative to the 'one' that got away. (Applicable to guys too).

And Most of black guys need lessons on when to back-off, after two tries, leave her the hell alone. Look for someone else. If she is meant for you she will come back to you out of her own volition.





Every woman has to face the problem of choosing one among many all declaring their sincere love to her, it gets more difficult when most black guys literally say 'I love you' to girls they have just met. This is the moment we lose focus, forget what we 'need' and blindly follow what we assume to b the best, the most convincing. Do not forget that social, economic and cultural factors play a huge role on how we make our decisions which I believe those are the causes of the 'stinking attitude', the reasons why we cannot date poor guys

Toks2008:
Im sorry but in my opinion,your post is not coherent.

I dpnt know what people mean by white wedding though but im my oponion,traditional wedding is vital according to cilture and bride price os a must if you truly want to have that full "franchise" as to been truly wedded tradionally. I dont see any need for white wedding at all as i see it as a waste of rrsources.

However,legal wedding is strpngly advised that is document signing which at least ensures that you are firmly rooted in your matrimony.

This does not mean the man or woman can not still leave the union but it will not just be an easy exit but must be hinged on a cogent factor.


So saying you know some ladies who are lgally married and still treated like shit is funny and i guess these ladies in question allowed it.

So i still maintain that legal wedding is vital for a lady who really want to be rooted in her matrimony else your case na sorry.

By 'those women' I was referring to women whose highest qualification in life is marriage. marriage is an escape for their inadequacy and inability to financially cater for themselves as adults. Their life aspirations are centred on their marriages, In case of Nigerian women, after their masters degree, their ultimate goal is to secure their husbands and his property.

Legal or no legal marriage none will prevent the men from behaving like arseholes if they chose to

And what security does a court marriage have to offer, Alimony? Child support? all of which are always at the detriment of the husbands' financial, mental and social well-being. Of course women are equal to men, that is why they need 'protection' at the expense of their husbands and encouragement to be unconcerned about everything else except their marriages.

NifemiOlu:
Na wa o.

Itshekiri not Ijesa

I found the link

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mfonobongnsehe/2012/02/21/nigerian-oil-baron-to-fight-21-million-divorce-with-african-law/

A wealthy Nigerian-born, British-based oil baron has been granted permission to use Nigerian tribal law to appeal a $21 million divorce payout to his former British wife, the Telegraph has reported.

Michael Prest, the 50 year-old founder of Nigerian energy trading firm Petrodel Resources, split from his wife in an acrimonious divorce in 2008. During a British High Court hearing on the divorce in October last year, the presiding judge ordered the tycoon to pay his former wife cash and assets worth over $20 million.

However, Prest has applied to appeal the court’s decision on the grounds that his Petrodel’s assets do not belong to him, but are held in trust for his children, siblings, nephews and nieces in Nigeria, under Nigerian Itsekiri customary law.

The oil baron claims that his company, Petrodel Resources Ltd, was established in 1992 with $13,000 in start-up capital which was provided by his late father. As a result, under traditional law, his company and assets are not owned entirely by him, but by his extended family; he mainly acts as custodian of the wealth.

The tycoon’s attorney Martin Pointer disclosed to the court that under customary law in Nigeria, Prest (who is the first-born son of his family) has a historic responsibility to use the family “inheritance” to look after his siblings and their children.

Prest’s case is also helped by the fact that his younger brother went to a Nigerian High Court in 2009 and obtained a declaration which states that Petrodel Resources is a part of their late father’s estate. Michael Prest also previously acquired a court order from a Nigerian court which forbids him from sharing information about Petrodel and its assets with third parties. Hence, it is difficult to ascertain the true market value of Petrodel resources.

But the former wife, Yasmin Prest, 49, is crying foul. She told the court that Petrodel is “100 per cent owned and controlled” by her former husband. Last October, during the original court case in London, she had claimed that her former husband was worth ‘many tens, if not hundreds, of millions of pounds’. She demanded a divorce payout of about $40 million, plus about $1 million a year for upkeep of herself and the four children she bore with the tycoon. Prest had previously offered her the equivalent of $35,000 a year and a lump sum of about $2.5 million.

The court has not yet set a date for the full appeal.


Michael Prest, an extremely reclusive oil trader and former protégé of controversial commodities trader Marc Rich, founded Petrodel resources in 2001. The company has extensive oil exploration interests in Nigeria, Tanzania, Zambia and Uganda.

Forbes

NifemiOlu:
The man is funny. Does he expect Nigerian laws to take hold in the UK? Assuming they got married in Nigeria and have Nigerian documents, Oyinbo go cry o. Why is Pastor Chris' wife getting a divorce in the UK? LoL

I think It did o

Amelian:
Some peeps here especially d women supporting the men saying that, what's in a court or church weDding , that requires a legal document 2 proclaim u as his legal wife anywhere in d world, Not only in yur hometown o or amongst family elders. So that as a bonafide wife to d man, u can be part of his life, especially when he has to relocate abroad or other benefits that comes wit it.
I av a cousin, who got married to a man of 3 wives, whom he married traditionally, but married my cousing legally, even do white wedding join. D 3 wives wan die .. But who caused it? So she married 2 d man, and she's d only legal wife, d man has in d court of law, if anything happens. He even made her incharge of all his documents and takes her abroad for trips as his only legal wife. Even though, he's got 3 wives he married. Traditionally, with kids.
Women, use yur brains.. Think, forget sentiments and face reality.

Too bad, the international will not recognise them as his legal wives but it will as his PARTNERS, whether the marriages were legal or not and the kids are legally his

He even made her [b]in charge of all his documents and takes her abroad for trips as his only legal wife[/b]

That doesnot imply that the properties are in her name, she would be asked to provide them if need be by the court of law


There is this old case in English law, the man left his his legal wife for another woman, there was no divorce. He opened an account in his name and upon his death, the issue of inheritance arose, whether it was the legal wife's or the partner's. Guess who inherited it.....

You guessed wrong






The partner did.


According to the evidences before the court, the man had said to her that 'this money is much yours as it is mine' and also the woman paid her money into that account (it could have been just £10 while the man could have paid £2000). The account was supposed to be a joint account, but it wasn't in their names but only in the man's because they were not legally married and she ended up holding the sole ownership to the money even though the court could have directed the money to be divided into two, one as inheritance for his legal wife and the other for the partner...



Your cousin's husband might have created a trust for all his kids without your cousin's knowlegde

NifemiOlu:
OP, are you ready for facts?

FACT: What you get from a divorced/broken court wedding is dependent on your tradition. Hence, it's the customs in which you got married that will determine what you get because the court will apply customary laws to trash out the issue.
FALLACY: Stop watching American movies where in a divorce, a woman gets 50% of what she owns with the man e.g Tiger Wood's wife. This is NOT applicable in Nigeria.
FACT: The court will compel the man to take certain responsibilities e.g school fees of the kids, health care and their general well being.

So, OP, what does the woman get?

I read an article about the divorce of one of the richest blacks in UK, he is an Ijesa man from Nigeria. He got married to a White woman and during the divorce settlement . The man argued that as a Yoruba man, his family, in particular his brother also has a certain share of his property and the fact that the start-up fund was provided by their father is evident of that fact therefore the money was meant to be exploited for the use of his and his brother

The facts of the case are a bit hazy...about three years ago

majekdom2:
if the man can bribe the lawyer , what makes you think he wouldnt go the extra mile even if there is a certificate. these days are ways to protect the future of your children , if you dont trust your extended family.

It is called Trust.

tatiana009:
I've heard of cases where it's the man collecting Alimony even though it's rare so the laws is there for both parties it's just that it favours more the party that isn't as rich as the other

It is not just rare BUT EXTREMELY RARE

It is indirect discrimination

MadCow1:
You miss the point of my future ex lover Sweetlemon.

The court or church marriage isn't meant to stop infidelity or abuse but to protect the woman under the law and grant her access to her rights like alimony and more under the law just I case the Nigga starts acting up later.

No need to thank God, thank me.

What is Alimony and Child Support?

Alimony and child support are divorce settlements where the man pays his wife the bulk of his monthly salary because the law asked him too

It gives women the power to mentally, financially and emotionally frustrate their husbands and ex-husbands throughout the rest of their lives

It makes men incapable of having another 'normal' family

It makes it a crime to be a 'man'

It allows ex-wives to sit their fat lazy asses at home all day because they were mainly dependant on their husbands' income while they were married and are now incapable of getting jobs

It provides ex-husbands and husbands a perfect motive to murder their wives.



And yet it has not stop any man from engaging in activities that are grounds for divorce


In today's world, a divorce settlement is concerned with the protection of women not the man because he is a man

Sweetlemon:
I agree with you. The government needs to do something about it for the sake of those who see no need for more than one ceremony. There is really a need for documents.

What motivated me to start this thread is a lady I know of currently crying her heart out right now. Her then struggling bf only did traditional wedding and postponed the white till further notice giving the excuse of finance. She moved into his house, only too happy to get a hubby just before clocking 30. The guy got an offer abroad but because they weren't legally married, he couldn't take her along. All advise that she should tell the guy to do court wedding of nothing more than 40k fell on deaf ears (court payments plus small refreshment for like 5 witnesses). She was hopeful that he will come back to do the white/court wedding at "his own pace" . Ok nau, the guy left. Little by little, he stopped calling her.

Then all of a sudden, she heard he was in town........ for his wedding! When her family confronted him, he said he was married to her traditionally and he was allowed to have as many wives as he wished under tradition she was given a choice to accept it or leave. Meanwhile he did white wedding with his second wife o! They signed documents. They have both since gone back abroad leaving his first wife high and dry without the dignity of any proceeding. As in it was like an ordinary unceremonious break-up btw a boyfriend and girlfriend. God forbid!

What a pity!

However would you like me to start counting women who were wedded legally and still got dumped and maltreated.

Court marriage is for 'those' women and NOT WOMEN

Sweetlemon:
I guess you are female.

Take my advise and get an official document. Thank me later.

Court marriage or no court marriage, it won't hinder an irresponsible man from shying away from his responsibilities, abusing his wife and from engaging in extramarital affairs.