₦airaland Forum

Spirit04:
1. He didn't commit any perjury they've submitted all his academic records.
2. INEC followed their guidelines. Court already ruled that only INEC can make decisions to safeguard results. INEC said you people were trying to hack their site and upload fake results which is why they waited until it was safe.
Besides the results have been uploaded so I don't know what you are complaining about.
3. Results being blurred on IREV is irrelevant. IREV copies are just synonymous to photocopies. If you collect certificate from your school and photocopy it but the photocopy came out blury it doesn't invalidate the original certificate that your school gave you or what they have on record.
You people are just playing with yourselves. The case is ridiculous, it will be dismissed and both Obi and Atiku will be fined a minimum of 50m for playing with judges and wasting everybody's time. I'm 100% certain. There's no way they won't pay fine

pquaver:
How can original be clear and u do photocopy sometimes, it wont be clear? See question person wey dey reason dey ask..

BlueRayDick:
Some of these protests and knee jerk reactions are just comical to say the least.

The ruling party conducted an election which they invited independent observers to come witness....The observers draw up report based on what they observed happened during the election and now same ruling party is having protesters matching up and down the capital in a bid to reject the EU observer's report. No be juju be that ?

So as una don convince una self say what happened was a "free and fair election", una still get mission to erase the memory of the observers as to what happened and replace it ur own version of what happened ?

https://www.nairaland.com/7755086/heavy-security-pro-tinubu-protesters-storm

Lotanna2:
Continue ranting childishly kid

Spirit04:
They will dismiss the case and fine both Obi and Atiku 50m each. I don't know what evidence you're talking about don't allow people to toil with your brain forever. The case is just ridiculous and defy any form of common sense and logic. They have zero chance of winning

wolesmile:
Mark my words...

Obi and Atiku will be fined for wasting the time of the tribunal. They're yet to prove anything till date.
Obi will appeal and lose.
Obi will, with his tactical brainwashing attitude on his unsuspecting followers, strive to remain relevant till 2027. That one will even be worse.
Obi is not a presidency material.
Obi is a BOY!!!

Lotanna2:
Peter failed to present concrete evidence

IconicR:
Oya we are waiting for judgement, judgement that you all will still fault

IconicR:
He did not win anything, there's no way he'll win . You all are so naive about Nigeria politics

helinues:
Smartly?

Should Obi and smartness be in the statement?

001Lagos:
Tinubu has been reduced to a laughing stock by the people that he called to defend him in court ..

Tinubu is a joke 😂🤣😂🤣

aswani:
Switruth,

I don't understand your response in the context of my message.

If the information I have posted is false, please regal us with the correct information.

garfield1:
Oga, guidelines cannot be used to nullify elections.
Secondly,rigging could have happened under any transmission whether electronic or manual.it is now left for you to prove it and show how it denied you victory substantially.did lp do that? NO.they are only assuming.
Lp only dumped physical result sheets in court.they failed to display or showcase the actual forms with irregularities,mutilations or blurriness.they only showed 18,000 blurred irev results.blurred results are different from mutilated results.blurred means unclear,mutilated means clear but with a lot of changes

ImperialYoruba:
Irev is a public service. So INEC gave commitment, promising transparency with the result. The result is a utility for public consumption. In such arrangements the commitment is treated as a service level . If Irev is not available they failed SLA (service level agreement). This does not mean the collated data at source lost validity.

By the way, what is the data? It is an ink stamped ballot paper. That is the data itself.

Is this what they put in Irev? NO.

Ink-stamped ballot papers, classified by party logo are counted at each polling unit and recorded on a form. The form is then endorsed by each party agent present. Over 176,000 polling units forwarded their endorsed forms to INEC. After adding all the reports on the forms to obtain result for each party and candidate the outcome is shared.

As part of its process improvement, INEC wants the collation of these reports and outcomes to be shared with public (Irev) in real time. This part of their process failed. Does this mean the ink-stamped ballots are no longer valid?

Validity & integrity of the data should not be faulted because INEC missed SLA.

TrebleChamp:
Another ban loading 😂😂😂

garfield1:
You are quoting from a mere guideline which is inferior.the electoral act has given inec the power to transmit anyhow.the supreme court has made server evidence secondary.thats that.apply commonsense and stop this nonsense

ImperialYoruba:
Irev result showed to him are blurry. Result used to declare winner is EC8 and BVAS, not irev.

Infact, you can take irev offline and integrity of result of the election is still intact.

The only way you can change the integrity is to manipulate EC8 and BVAS.

Petition should have focused on the integrity of the BVAS and EC8, not on irev.

garfield1:
Read the full sttaement of justice agim about third hand evidence

DOptical:
Use brain na.

Both has the same content on them.

One recently issued from the school. The other is an old one issued from the school years ago. Both has same content on it.

garfield1:
Yes to an extent.it is useful in the absence of manual results

garfield1:
Read osun judgment again by justice agim.it is oyetola vs adeleke supra 2023 per jsc agim.

garfield1:
The camera of the bvas could be faulty,bad handling by inec staff,bad weather,bad flashlight.when photocopying documents,don't some copies come out blurry? Does that mean forgery? Forgery is when something is mutilated or erased.why has obi not displayed mutilated documents

garfield1:
The supreme court interpreted it in osun

garfield1:
Oga,that is not what is being argued.yiu guys always misunderstand issues.atiku is saying his name in his degree is different from his other documents and that his transcripts belong to a female and his nysc was forged.he never said his bsc was fake.

nihilistjnr:
Ogbeni we know how you move, own it.



When you thought Chicago State University disowned Tinubu's certificate, the supposed word of the uni was good enough



But when someone presents a result slip with somebody else's name literally encoded in it, you're calling for an independent review of JAMB Systems before the girl can be called guilty?

If you just own your tribalism, you would look less foolish...not a lot less foolish, but less foolish all the same.

OasisX:


.....if you like keep wailing forever, wetin concern me?!

OasisX:


.... you're aware of it but you would rather stick to craps Hundeyin is feeding you folks? LOL!

Democracy is in danger, Judiciary is compromised would be anthem soon on this board.

seunmsg:
They are blurry only on IREV. The real form EC8A results for the 18k units are not blurry. They are very clear and they were used in collating the results. Results were not collated on IREV.

seunmsg:
For people like you to view from home.

OasisX:
The academic records from the Chicago State University, 12 documents in all, were certified on June 28, 2023 by Jamar C. Orr, the Associate General Counsel, Office of the Legal Affairs, Chicago State University.

https://community.thenationonlineng.net/forum/breaking-tinubu-tenders-academic-records-from-chicago-state-unive?xg_source=twitter

Its damn hard to be associated with that movement and still have your brain functioning well as a sensible human.